Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- PHASE 1: ESTABLISHING RELIABILITY OF LANGUAGE USE
- Text Analysis Procedures
- Language Composition
- Psychological Processes
- Relativity
- Current Concerns
- Reliability Studies
- Method
- Participants and Procedure
- Sample 1: Daily diaries by inpatients in an addiction treatment center
- Sample 2: Daily class assignments by Taos summer school students
- Sample 3: Published abstracts by prominent social psychologists
- Results
- Discussion
- PHASE 2: EXPLORING THE FACTOR STRUCTURE OF LANGUAGE USE
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Results
- Factor Analyses for the Original Samples
- Congruence of Factor Analyses for Confirmatory Sample
- PHASE 3: VALIDITY STUDIES
- Language Use and Measures of Motivation
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Criteria for motive-relevant behavior
- Classroom behavior
- Motive coding
- Results and Discussion
- Language Use, Traits, and Demographic Variables
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Results
- Correlations With the Five-Factor Personality Dimensions
- Correlations With Other Demographic, Health, and Individual-Differences Variables
- Predicting Illness-Related Behaviors With LIWC and Five-Factor Models
- Discussion and Summary of Validity Results
- GENERAL DISCUSSION
- Appendix A
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Can language use reflect personality style? Studies examined the reliability, factor structure, and validity of written language using a word-based, computerized text analysis program. Daily diaries from 15 substance abuse inpatients, daily writing assignments from 35 students, and journal abstracts from 40 social psychologists demonstrated good internal consistency for over 36 language dimensions. Analyses of the best 15 language dimensions from essays by 838 students yielded 4 factors that replicated across written samples from another 381 students. Finally, linguistic profiles from writing samples were compared with Thematic Apperception Test coding, self-reports, and behavioral measures from 79 students and with self-reports of a 5-factor measure and health markers from more than 1,200 students. Despite modest effect sizes, the data suggest that linguistic style is an independent and meaningful way of exploring personality.
That people differ in the ways they talk and write is hardly a novel observation. Even when the content of the message is the same, individuals express themselves verbally with their own distinctive styles. As with spoken language, written language is also unique from person to person. Teachers and researchers can often decipher the identity of students when grading their exams or can determine the reviewers of their manuscripts simply by the words...





