Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Historical Background
- Persistence of the Culture of Honor
- Experiment 1
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Results and Discussion
- Emotional Reactions
- Projective Hostility
- Word completion
- Face ratings
- Scenario completions
- Insult Prime Scenario
- Experiment 2
- Physiological Measure of Stress
- Physiological Measure of Preparedness for Future Aggression
- Desire of the Participant to Demonstrate Toughness
- Interpretation of Ambiguous Stimuli
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Assays
- Results
- Emotion Ratings
- Cortisol Levels
- Testosterone Levels
- Shock Levels
- Ambiguous Insult Scenarios
- Discussion
- Experiment 3
- Perceived Effect of the Insult on One's Masculine Status
- Aggressive Behavior in a Challenge Situation After the Insult
- Dominance Behavior in Subsequent Encounters After the Insult
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Results
- “Chicken” Game
- Encounter With the Evaluator
- Damage to Reputation
- Masculine Protest Questionnaires
- Demographic Variables
- Discussion
- General Discussion
- Appendix A
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Three experiments examined how norms characteristic of a “culture of honor” manifest themselves in the cognitions, emotions, behaviors, and physiological reactions of southern White males. Participants were University of Michigan students who grew up in the North or South. In 3 experiments, they were insulted by a confederate who bumped into the participant and called him an “asshole.” Compared with northerners—who were relatively unaffected by the insult—southerners were (a) more likely to think their masculine reputation was threatened, (b) more upset (as shown by a rise in cortisol levels), (c) more physiologically primed for aggression (as shown by a rise in testosterone levels), (d) more cognitively primed for aggression, and (e) more likely to engage in aggressive and dominant behavior. Findings highlight the insult–aggression cycle in cultures of honor, in which insults diminish a man's reputation and he tries to restore his status by aggressive or violent behavior.
Approximately 20, 000–25,000 Americans will die in homicides this year, and tens of thousands more will be injured in stabbings or gunfights that could have ended in death. In about half of the homicides for which police can find a cause, the triggering incident seems argument- or conflict-related (Fox & Pierce, 1987); and, in many of these cases, this triggering incident might be classified as “trivial” in origin, arising from a dispute over a small amount of money, an...





