Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- Norm Violations and the Experience of Betrayal
- Forgiveness of Betrayal
- Commitment and Forgiveness
- Research Overview
- Study 1
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Reliability and validity of measures
- Results and Discussion
- Manipulation check
- Effects of commitment prime and participant sex
- Are the effects of the commitment prime mediated by subjective commitment?
- Ruling out alternative explanations
- Study 2
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Measuring severity of betrayal
- Reliability and validity of measures
- Content of betrayal incidents
- Results and Discussion
- Effects of commitment level, time, and participant sex
- Are associations with commitment mediated by mental events?
- Ruling out alternative explanations
- Study 3
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Reliability and validity of measures
- Content of betrayal incidents
- Results and Discussion
- Analysis strategy
- Effects of commitment level
- Are associations with commitment mediated by mental events?
- Why does commitment promote forgiveness?
- Ruling out alternative explanations
- General Discussion
- Why Do Victims Forgive?
- How Do Victims Forgive?
- Sex Differences in Reactions to Betrayal
- Broader Implications
- Limitations and Directions for Future Research
- Conclusions
Figures and Tables
Abstract
This work complements existing research regarding the forgiveness process by highlighting the role of commitment in motivating forgiveness. On the basis of an interdependence-theoretic analysis, the authors suggest that (a) victims' self-oriented reactions to betrayal are antithetical to forgiveness, favoring impulses such as grudge and vengeance, and (b) forgiveness rests on prorelationship motivation, one cause of which is strong commitment. A priming experiment, a cross-sectional survey study, and an interaction record study revealed evidence of associations (or causal effects) of commitment with forgiveness. The commitment-forgiveness association appearred to rest on intent to persist rather than long-term orientation or psychological attachment. In addition, the commitment-forgiveness association was mediated by cognitive interpretations of betrayal incidents; evidence for mediation by emotional reactions was inconsistent.
Although close partners often treat one another in a positive and considerate manner, negative interactions are nearly inevitable. Such interactions result from a variety of causes, including incompatible preferences, external sources of stress, and extrarelationship temptation. We suggest that the violation of a relationship-relevant norm—or betrayal of one's partner—constitutes one of the more serious threats to a relationship, and we propose that the resolution of betrayal incidents is not easy. Indeed, forgiveness of betrayal arguably is one of the more...





