Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- A Review of Past Research
- Theories of Experimental Disclosure
- Inhibition Theory
- Cognitive-Processing Theory
- Self-Regulation Theory
- Other Theories
- A True Effect?
- When Does It Work, and for Whom?
- Proposed Moderators
- Report Information Variables
- Setting Variables
- Participant Variables
- Methodological Variables
- Treatment Variables
- Hypotheses of Proposed Moderators
- Method
- Literature Search
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
- Coding Procedure
- Calculating Effect Sizes
- Significance Testing
- Coding Reliability
- Ratings of Study Quality
- Results
- The Effects of Experimental Disclosure
- Overall effects
- Psychological health
- Physiological functioning
- Reported health
- Health behaviors
- Subjective impact of the intervention
- General functioning/life outcomes
- Moderating Variables
- Report information variables
- Setting variables
- Participant variables
- Methodological variables
- Treatment variables
- Effect of Study Quality
- Multivariate Analysis of Moderators
- Discussion
- The Overall Effect
- Effects of Outcome Categories
- Moderators of the Effect
- Report information variables
- Setting variables
- Participant variables
- Methodological variables
- Treatment variables
- Applications to Theory
- Disinhibition theory
- Cognitive-processing theory
- Self-regulation theory
- Social integration theory
- Exposure theory
- Conclusions
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Disclosing information, thoughts, and feelings about personal and meaningful topics (experimental disclosure) is purported to have various health and psychological consequences (e.g., J. W. Pennebaker, 1993). Although the results of 2 small meta-analyses (P. G. Frisina, J. C. Borod, & S. J. Lepore, 2004; J. M. Smyth, 1998) suggest that experimental disclosure has a positive and significant effect, both used a fixed effects approach, limiting generalizability. Also, a plethora of studies on experimental disclosure have been completed that were not included in the previous analyses. One hundred forty-six randomized studies of experimental disclosure were collected and included in the present meta-analysis. Results of random effects analyses indicate that experimental disclosure is effective, with a positive and significant average r-effect size of .075. In addition, a number of moderators were identified.
When a person experiences an important life event, the tendency to disclose information about that event has long been considered both normal (Jourard, 1971) and healthy (Alexander, 1950). From negative events, such as the loss of a loved one or interpersonal conflicts, to positive events, such as graduation from college or marriage, most people tend to share details of their emotional experiences with others within days or...





