Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- A Brief History of Research on Personality and Academic Performance
- Academic Performance
- Why Should Personality Be Related to Academic Performance?
- Relationships of Individual FFM Dimensions With Academic Performance
- Potential Moderators of Academic Performance–Personality Correlations
- Method
- Sample
- Coding
- Statistical Corrections
- Results
- Discussion
- Academic Level
- Age
- Interaction of Age and Academic Level
- Limitations
- Conclusion
Figures and Tables
Abstract
This article reports a meta-analysis of personality–academic performance relationships, based on the 5-factor model, in which cumulative sample sizes ranged to over 70,000. Most analyzed studies came from the tertiary level of education, but there were similar aggregate samples from secondary and tertiary education. There was a comparatively smaller sample derived from studies at the primary level. Academic performance was found to correlate significantly with Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness. Where tested, correlations between Conscientiousness and academic performance were largely independent of intelligence. When secondary academic performance was controlled for, Conscientiousness added as much to the prediction of tertiary academic performance as did intelligence. Strong evidence was found for moderators of correlations. Academic level (primary, secondary, or tertiary), average age of participant, and the interaction between academic level and age significantly moderated correlations with academic performance. Possible explanations for these moderator effects are discussed, and recommendations for future research are provided.
Research on personality and its relationships to important personal, social, and economic constructs is as vibrant and influential as ever (Funder, 2001), and such research has been credited with prompting many of the major advances in fields such as organizational behavior (Hough, 2001). Much of this contribution can be linked directly to theoretical and statistical reviews of the role of personality, such as the pivotal meta-analyses of correlations between personality and work performance (Barrick & Mount, 1991; Hough, Eaton, Dunnette, Kamp, & McCloy, 1990). Such integrations of research have allowed researchers to assess the major features of these relationships and have provided guidance for future studies. It is therefore surprising that, to date, there has been no comparable review of the relationship between personality and academic performance. This article reports on an attempt to provide just such an exhaustive statistical review.





