Content area
Full Text
Contents
- Abstract
- Point 1: Resilience Is Different From Recovery
- The Grief Work Assumption
- Trauma Interventions and Critical Incident Debriefing
- Point 2: Resilience Is Common
- Resilience to Loss
- Resilience to Violent and Life-Threatening Events
- Point 3: There Are Multiple and Sometimes Unexpected Pathways to Resilience
- Hardiness
- Self-Enhancement
- Repressive Coping
- Positive Emotion and Laughter
- Toward a Broader Conceptualization of Stress Responding
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Many people are exposed to loss or potentially traumatic events at some point in their lives, and yet they continue to have positive emotional experiences and show only minor and transient disruptions in their ability to function. Unfortunately, because much of psychology’s knowledge about how adults cope with loss or trauma has come from individuals who sought treatment or exhibited great distress, loss and trauma theorists have often viewed this type of resilience as either rare or pathological. The author challenges these assumptions by reviewing evidence that resilience represents a distinct trajectory from the process of recovery, that resilience in the face of loss or potential trauma is more common than is often believed, and that there are multiple and sometimes unexpected pathways to resilience.
Most people are exposed to at least one violent or life-threatening situation during the course of their lives (Ozer, Best, Lipsey, & Weiss, 2003). As people progress through the life cycle, they are also increasingly confronted with the deaths of close friends and relatives. Not everyone copes with these potentially disturbing events in the same way. Some people experience acute distress from which they are unable to recover. Others suffer less intensely and for a much shorter period of time. Some people seem to recover quickly but then begin to experience unexpected health problems or difficulties concentrating or enjoying life the way they used to. However, large numbers of people manage to endure the temporary upheaval of loss or potentially traumatic events remarkably well, with no apparent disruption in their ability to function at work or in close relationships, and seem to move on to new challenges with apparent ease. This article is devoted to the latter group and to the question of resilience in the face of loss or potentially traumatic events.
The importance of protective psychological factors...