Content area

Abstract

This study explored children's preferences for 13 computer software programs and field-tested the relationship of developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) ratings of early childhood computer software programs to actual child selection. Participants were 19 4-year-olds. The Haugland and Shade (1990) evaluation instrument was used to assign DAP ratings to the software programs; children were then video- and audiotaped at the computers over one semester. Results showed: (1) some positive relationships between highly rated programs and children's preferences; (2) features identified in Haugland and Shade (1992), such as age-appropriateness, open-endedness, child-controlled or process-oriented, were present in the frequently selected programs, but some developmentally inappropriate software programs were preferred by children; (3) children preferred the software that provided the opportunity to interact, and interactions were the defining characteristic that motivated selections; and (4) male students chose to visit the computer area more frequently than female students. (Contains 26 references.) (Author/EV)

Details

1007399
Supplemental data
Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 28, 1997).
Title
A Comparison of Child-Tested Early Childhood Education Software with Professional Ratings
Pages
27
Number of pages
27
Publication date
March 28, 1997
Source type
Report
Summary language
English
Language of publication
English
Document type
Report, Speech/Lecture
Subfile
ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE)
Accession number
ED411060
ProQuest document ID
62495854
Document URL
https://www.proquest.com/reports/comparison-child-tested-early-childhood-education/docview/62495854/se-2?accountid=208611
Last updated
2024-04-21
Database
Education Research Index