Content area
Full Text
Contents
- Abstract
- Major Life Goals in Terms of Agency and Communion
- The Interplay of Traits and Goals in Theories of Personality
- The FFT
- The NST
- The Present Study
- Method
- Participants and Procedure
- Measures
- Big Five dimensions of personality
- Communion and Agency goals
- Analyses
- Univariate analyses
- Cross-sectional multivariate analyses
- Longitudinal multivariate analyses
- Results
- Bivariate Phenotypic Correlations Between Traits and Goals
- Univariate Biometric Analyses
- Cross-Sectional Multivariate Biometric Analyses
- Longitudinal Multivariate Biometric Analyses
- Discussion
- Refining the Phenotypic Picture
- How Heritable Are Major Life Goals?
- Are There Unique Genetic Effects on Major Life Goals?
- Are There Common Environmental Effects on the Big Five and Major Life Goals?
- Are There Cross-Time Effects Between the Big Five and Major Life Goals?
- Limitations and Future Directions
- Conclusions
Figures and Tables
Abstract
Modern personality theories differ in their assumptions about the structure and etiology of the interplay between personality traits and motivational constructs. The present study examined the genetic and environmental sources of the interplay between the Big Five and major life goals concurrently and across time in order to provide a more decisive evaluation of the conflicting assumptions stated in the five-factor theory as opposed to socioanalytic conceptions. Traits and goals were assessed twice across a 5-year period in a sample of 217 identical and 112 fraternal twin pairs from the Bielefeld Longitudinal Study of Adult Twins. About 30% of the variance in agency and communion life goals was genetic; the remaining variance was due to nonshared environmental effects, whereas shared environmental effects were negligible. Both heritable and environmental variance in goals could partly be accounted for by genetic and nonshared environmental effects on personality traits. Across time, we revealed reciprocal genetic and environmental effects between traits and life goals. In sum, our findings yield partial support for both of the 2 competing personality theories, suggesting a readjusted picture of the interplay between traits and goals.
Emphasizing that there is more to personality than traits, Roberts and Robins (2000) posed the question, “What is the conceptual relation between personality traits and goals?” (p. 1286). Interested in the origins, development, and functioning of the constituting units of the personality system, they called for a stronger integration...