Content area

Abstract

In this response to Muis et al. (2006), I draw on the writings of Dewey to explore three critical questions. The first question is what is gained or what is lost when the study of epistemology moves from philosophy to psychology and eventually to educational practice? The second asks whether the primary question under examination should be if students' beliefs about knowledge or knowing differ by domains or why they may differ? Finally, what are the implications of the generality or specificity of students' epistemic beliefs for educational practice?[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Details

Title
What Would Dewey Say? Channeling Dewey on the Issue of Specificity of Epistemic Beliefs: A Response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006)
Author
Alexander, Patricia A
Pages
55-65
Publication year
2006
Publication date
Mar 2006
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
ISSN
1040726X
e-ISSN
1573336X
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
758467501
Copyright
Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006