Content area
Abstract
Classical economists had developed advanced theories of public debt. These theories, however, have received less attention compared with those of value and distribution. Classical theories of national debt at best receive cursory consideration and are only used to offer further justification to modern theories. Smith's discussion of the unproductive role of the state and the Ricardian equivalence theorem are examples that are found routinely in the books of public finance or macroeconomics. As for the ideas of classical economists per se these are considered inappropriate for modern economies and are ignored even in books of history of economic thought. This paper takes issue with this view and argues that the ideas of classical economists on public debt might be more relevant nowadays than is commonly thought. (JEL: B12, B22)[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]