Content area
Full text
Contents
- Abstract
- The Clark and Hatfield (1989) Studies: A Review
- A Major Confound in Clark and Hatfield (1989)
- Perspectives on the Gender Differences in Clark and Hatfield (1989)
- Socialized Gender Differences in the Perception of Risk
- Pleasure Theory
- Sexual Strategies Theory (SST)
- Methodological Approach
- The Current Research
- Study 1: Are Female Proposers Perceived Differently Than Male Proposers?
- Study 1a
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Materials
- Scenario
- Likelihood of acceptance of the sexual offer
- Perceived personality traits of the proposer
- Interest in a short-term relationship
- Results and Discussion
- Offer acceptance
- Are male proposers perceived more negatively than female proposers?
- Study 1b
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Materials
- Scenario
- Personality traits of the proposer
- Results and Discussion
- Offer acceptance
- Are male proposers perceived more negatively than female proposers?
- Study 1c
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Materials
- Scenario
- Personality traits of the proposer
- Results and Discussion
- Are male proposers perceived more negatively than female proposers?
- Study 1d
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Results and Discussion
- Study 2: Can Gender Differences in Casual Sex Acceptance Be Eliminated?
- Study 2a
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Measures
- Scenario development
- Scenario
- Measures
- Results and Discussion
- Reactions to relationships with proposers of varying levels of attractiveness
- Gender comparisons in reaction to famous vs. unfamiliar proposers
- Gender comparisons in reactions to the attractive proposers
- Gender comparisons in reactions to the unattractive proposers
- Specific comparisons between conditions
- Perceived personality traits of proposers
- Study 2b
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Materials
- Scenario development
- Scenario
- Measures
- Results and Discussion
- Reactions to different relationships with proposers of varying levels of attractiveness
- Gender comparisons in reaction to familiar vs. unfamiliar proposers
- Gender comparisons in reactions to the attractive proposers
- Gender comparisons in reactions to the unattractive proposers
- Specific comparisons between conditions
- Study 2c
- Method
- Participants and procedure
- Measures
- Results
- Study 2d
- Method
- Participants, procedure, and materials
- Results and Discussion
- Study 3: What Factors Predict Acceptance of the CHSP?
- Method
- Participants, procedure, and measures
- Results and Discussion
- Predicting acceptance of the casual sex offer
- Predicting desire for a short-term relationship
- Summary
- Mediational analyses
- Study 4: What Factors Predict Acceptance of an Actual Casual Sex Offer?
- Method
- Participants
- Procedure
- Acceptance of the sexual offer
- Measures
- Results and Discussion
- Offer acceptance
- Are male proposers perceived more negatively than female proposers?
- Predicting acceptance of the casual sex offer
- Mediational...