[[missing key: loading-pdf-error]] [[missing key: loading-pdf-link]]
Abstract
In a global economy with intense competition, companies face tremendous pressure to become more innovation-driven. With the development of information technologies, many companies are seeking to incorporate novel IT-based approaches in their business practices, such as evaluating emerging technologies, generating ideas for new products and services, etc. Motivated by this phenomenon, I explore in my dissertation how companies can take advantage of two new techniques: information preference markets (I-PREFS) and firm-sponsored online brainstorming (FOB).
My dissertation consists of six chapters. Chapter 1 gives an introduction of the whole dissertation. Chapter 2 focuses on how companies can use information preference markets (I-PREFS) to rank and evaluate emerging technologies. This research is a joint work with our partner company who finds its current evaluation process expensive, inflexible, and incapable to handle a large number of emerging technologies. We develop two preference markets to evaluate 17 emerging technologies. Our result shows that extra participation-based play money helps motivate participation, boost preference aggregation in terms of converging prices, and improve consistence of preference market with an independent expert panel.
Chapter 3 extends the research of I-PREFS by examining whether participants reveal their true information. Using a series of controlled laboratory experiments, we are able to identify participants' revealed preference. Our results show that most participants reveal their preference consistently. We also find that I-PREFS and post-market survey are much closer to the expert panel's ranking.
Chapter 4 explores how companies can use firm-sponsored online brainstorming (FOB) to harness external publics' innovative knowledge. Since most FOBs are voluntary electronic brainstorming settings, FOB sponsors need a better understanding of key factors that influence participants' contributing activities and active duration. Guided by related literature, we established a theoretical framework and developed a series of hypotheses. Using data collected from Dell IdeaStorm, we find that peer feedback and sponsoring firm feedback do influence participants' contribution but at different levels. In addition, sponsoring firm responsiveness is a key factor in both motivating and retaining participants Chapter 5 summarizes several other empirical analyses on FOB. Chapter 6 concludes the dissertation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





