It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Perception is subject to ongoing alterations by learning and top-down influences. Although abundant studies have shown modulation of perception by attention, motivation, content and context, there is an unresolved controversy whether these examples provide true evidence that perception is penetrable by cognition. Here we show that tactile perception assessed as spatial discrimination can be instantaneously and systematically altered merely by the semantic content during hypnotic suggestions. To study neurophysiological correlates, we recorded EEG and SEPs. We found that the suggestion “your index finger becomes bigger” led to improved tactile discrimination, while the suggestion “your index finger becomes smaller” led to impaired discrimination. A hypnosis without semantic suggestions had no effect but caused a reduction of phase-locking synchronization of the beta frequency band between medial frontal cortex and the finger representation in somatosensory cortex. Late SEP components (P80–N140 complex) implicated in attentional processes were altered by the semantic contents, but processing of afferent inputs in SI remained unaltered. These data provide evidence that the psychophysically observed modifiability of tactile perception by semantic contents is not simply due to altered perception-based judgments, but instead is a consequence of modified perceptual processes which change the perceptual experience.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Neurology, BG-Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)
2 Klaipėda University, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Klaipeda, Lithuania (GRID:grid.14329.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1011 2418)
3 Ruhr-University Bochum, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL Universitätsklinikum Bochum, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)
4 Ruhr University Bochum, Institute of Philosophy II, Bochum, Germany (GRID:grid.5570.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0490 981X)