Author details 1-U.S. Geological Survey, 2329 W. Orton Circle, Salt Lake City, UT 84119, USA
2-U.S. Geological Survey, 3215 Marine Street, Suite E-127, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
3-U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, MS 963, Denver, CO 80225, USA
Introduction
The chemical quality of snowfall deposited in high-elevation areas in the Rocky Mountain region can be affected by energy generation and associated population growth [1-2]. High elevation areas in the Wind River Range (WRR) of Wyoming (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) exceed 4 km above sea level and are adjacent to areas of accelerating energy development [3]. For example, over 3,000 natural gas wells are being installed in the Green River Basin, directly west of the WRR. Full development of the Jonah gas field could result in the production of 1,480 metric tons/yr of NOx and 25.7 metric tons/yr of SO2 [3].
Figure 1
Location of NADP/NTN and ice-coring sites in Wind River Range, Wyoming
Location of NADP/NTN and ice-coring sites in Wind River Range, Wyoming .
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Thin soils and dilute surface-water systems in high-elevation areas have limited capacities to buffer increased acidity associated with the airborne contaminants of NOx and SO2 . Trends in precipitation chemistry at NADP/NTN sites in the western United States have indicated an increase in total N deposition and a decrease in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition from 1981-1998 [4]. In addition to monitoring trends in N and S deposition, the isotopic composition of snow, firn, and ice has been used to differentiate natural and anthropogenic solute sources. Stable isotope ratios of sulfur in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , expressed as δ34 S, were monitored in bulk snowpack samples collected from a network of 52 high-elevation sites in the Rocky Mountains from 1993 to 1999 [5]. The δ34 S values indicated that snowpack S in high-elevation areas is primarily derived from anthropogenic sources [5].
Changes in δ34 S values in firn and ice-core samples have been used to reconstruct changes in sulfate sources to central Asia, Greenland, and Antarctica. The variation in δ34 S values in a firn core from central Asia allowed for the identification of S derived from marine evaporites (+15 [per thousand]) during high dust deposition events and anthropogenic emissions (+5.4 [per thousand]) [6]. Preindustrial δ34 S signatures in Greenland ice cores were comprised of marine biogenic emissions, continental dust sources, background volcanism, and continental biota [7]. Beginning in 1870 A.D., δ34 S signatures in the ice-core samples indicated anthropogenic S sources.
In Antarctica, shallow firn cores collected from the South Pole contained δ34 S values that were used to confirm and contrast the different S isotopic signals between the low-latitude Agunge volcanic eruption in 1963 and background marine biogenic sulfate [8]. Composited ice-core samples representing coastal and plateau regions on the Antarctic ice sheet were found to have similar δ34 S values over the past 1,100 years, indicative of no temporal change in influencing sources of S [9]. Values of δ34 S in two ice cores from east Antarctica over the complete glacial/interglacial cycle were significantly lighter than previous measurements of δ34 S from the South Pole [10]. A likely mechanism for the observed isotopic difference was Rayleigh-type fractionation as S species are oxidized and transported toward the East Antarctic Plateau [10]. Measurements of δ34 S values in an ice core collected from west Antarctica were found to be a mixture of marine and volcanic S sources during the time period from 1935-1976. [11].
Stable isotopes have also been used to gain a better understanding of N sources in atmospheric deposition. Historical records of the isotopic composition of N2 O in trapped gases (ice cores) from Greenland and interstitial air (snowpack) from the South Pole have been used to differentiate between natural and anthropogenic sources [12]. The δ15 N value of atmospheric N2 O has dropped by 1.7 [per thousand] during the 20th century, likely due to increasing agricultural activities [12]. In support of these measurements, simulations of N2 O(g) have indicated a -1.8 [per thousand] shift in δ15 N over the last two centuries, primarily due to anthropogenic influences [13]. The δ15 N of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in wet deposition from 33 sites in the northeastern United States was strongly correlated with the location of coal-fired powerplants [14]. Ice-core samples from Greenland indicated decreasing δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) values with increasing [figure omitted; refer to PDF] concentrations; however, more information is needed to confirm this trend and differentiate source area vs. post-depositional processes during the firn-to-ice transition [15]. A more recent ice-core record from Greenland, spanning deposition from 1718 to 2006, revealed a clear trend of decreasing δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) values from 11 [per thousand] (pre-industrial) to -1 [per thousand] (~1996-2006) [16].
Although previous studies have shown that δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) values of snow and ice samples have excellent potential for providing information on [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources, post-depositional changes in the concentration and isotopic composition of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] needs to be considered [17-18]. Year-round measurement of δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) values in snow pits from Dome C, Antarctica, indicated strong enrichment relative to atmospheric [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and loss of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] mass from the snow surface due to UV-photolysis [17]. In contrast to the Antarctica results, a similar study in Greenland [18] indicated minimal influence of photolysis on the isotopic composition of δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) in firn and ice. One possible reason for the different research results between the two studies may be the higher snow accumulation rates at the Greenland study site [18]. Higher rates of snow accumulation were found to mitigate the magnitude of post-depositional processing and loss of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in the snowpack [19].
Glaciers present in the high elevation regions of the WRR, Wyoming, present a unique opportunity to couple short-term (1980 to present) NADP/NTN data (sites WY06 and WY98) trends in the chemistry of atmospheric deposition with similar and longer term data preserved in glacial ice from the nearby UFG (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). The UFG is the only glacier within the continental U.S. where ice cores have been documented to contain paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatological records [20-27]. Characteristics present at UFG conducive to preserving paleonvironmental signals include: (1) ice-coring site altitudes that exceed 4 km above sea level (ASL) to minimize meltwater modification of the snow and ice chemistry and (2) large ice thicknesses (ranging from 60 to 172 m in the upper half of the glacier) to provide long-term paleoenvironmental records.
Ice cores exceeding 160 m in length were recovered from UFG in 1991 and 1998 [23-24]. The 1991 ice core was estimated to contain 250 years of record as determined from carbon-14 dating of an insect leg recovered from near the bottom of the core [23]. This length of record was subsequently confirmed by a higher-resolution chronology established with continuous electrical conductivity measurements [26]. On the basis of these data, ice at the bottom of UFG in proximity to the 1991 and 1998 drilling sites was likely deposited as snow prior to 1710 AD.
The overall objective of this paper is to demonstrate the effectiveness of using the isotopic composition and concentration of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in ice-core samples collected from the UFG to supplement and extend existing NADP/NTN records. Specific objectives are to: (1) determine atmospheric deposition sources since the late 1940s by determining the isotopic values of δ34 S ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) and δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) in ice-core samples; (2) reconstruct changes in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] wet deposition rates from ice-core samples representative of snow deposited from the early-1950s to early-1990s; and (3) couple the results from objectives 1 and 2 with existing NADP/NTN deposition records and NOX /SO2 emission records to identify processes controlling long-term trends in the loading of S and N at high-elevation sites.
Methods
Field
Ice cores were collected from UFG in 1991 and 1998 using a thermal drill as described in [23]. The ice cores were collected in 1- and 2-m segments. On-site processing of the cores included visual inspection, logging, and density determinations by personnel wearing Tyvek suits and powder-free Latex gloves. The cores were sealed in polyethylene bags, placed in plastic core tubes, and stored in snow vaults until removal from the site to a freezer truck via a 10-minute helicopter flight. The UFG ice cores are currently archived at the National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL) in Lakewood, Colorado.
Laboratory
Ice-core samples were melted according to strict protocols [21] to minimize sample contamination. Ice cores were subsampled using a bandsaw frequently cleaned with ethanol in cold room laboratories at NICL. Multiple core sections from each interval were composited in order to obtain sufficient S and N mass for isotopic analyses. The surface ice from each subsample was scraped away with a stainless steel microtome. Each ice sample was thoroughly rinsed with ultrapure (18.0 megaohm) deionized water and placed in a prerinsed and covered plastic container. Each sample was allowed to melt at room temperature for one hour (or until approximately 15 mL of meltwater had accumulated). After this initial melt period the sample was rinsed in the accumulated meltwater, and the melt was discarded. The remaining sample was allowed to melt in the covered plastic container at room temperature.
For S isotopic analysis, meltwater volumes corresponding to 90-100 micrograms of sulfate (0.5-6 L) were evaporated to dryness within covered canisters flushed by dry nitrogen. The samples were transferred from 4-L Pyrex beakers to smaller Savillex beakers when they had been reduced to about 100 mL. Drydown salts were redissolved in a few mL of deionized water which was pipetted into tin capsules and evaporated a few hundred microliters at a time. One to 2 mg of powdered V2 O5 was added and the capsules were pinched closed.
Filled capsules were combusted in an elemental analyzer to produce SO2 for analysis by isotope ratio monitoring using a Micromass Optima [28]. The elemental analyzer-mass spectrometer system was standardized using reference materials previously calibrated against IAEA-SO-5 and NBS 127 assuming δ34 S values for them of -34.05 and 21.1 [per thousand], respectively [29]. To evaluate accuracy, synthetic Ca2+ -Na+ -K+ solutions were prepared with reagents of known isotopic composition and then dried and analyzed. Sodium-dominated solutions gave δ34 S values indistinguishable from the reagents used to prepare them; however, solutions with Na+ :Ca2+ ratios equivalent to the UFG samples were about 1 [per thousand] low. The cause of this inaccuracy is uncertain. No attempt was made to correct the UFG measurements for a possible similar inaccuracy. The S isotopic compositions are reported in δ-notation relative to Vienna Canon Diablo troilite. Reproducibility for triplicate analysis of sample ISO-1 was ±0.4 [per thousand] (one standard deviation).
For N isotopic analysis, meltwater volumes corresponding to 1.2 micrograms of nitrate (6-80 mL) were evaporated to <5 mL by the same method used for sulfur. Nitrous oxide (N2 O) was produced by the denitrifier method using the Pseudomonas chlororaphis bacterium (ATCC 43928) [30-31], and the isotope ratios were measured using a ThermoFinnigan Delta Plus XL equipped with an autosampler and gas bench device. To calibrate the measurements and correct for media blanks, aliquots of the reference materials USGS32 KNO3 (δ15 N = 180 [per thousand]), USGS34 KNO3 (δ15 N = -1.8 [per thousand]), and USGS35 NaNO3 (δ15 N = 2.7 [per thousand]) were analyzed along with the unknowns.
Because the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in UFG samples is atmospheric in origin, it is likely to contain excess 17 O (commonly expressed as values of Δ17 O greater than zero) [32]. For single bacterium experiments like those carried out in this study, excess 17 O leads to δ15 N results that are erroneously high by 1 [per thousand] per 18.8 [per thousand] increase in Δ17 O [33]. Our δ15 N determinations for USGS35, which has a Δ17 O value of 21.1 [per thousand], showed an error corresponding to 1 [per thousand] per 18.3 [per thousand] increase in Δ17 O. The highest Δ17 O values that have been observed to date in modern and ancient atmospheric nitrate are 39 and 20 [per thousand], respectively [34-36], and the results of a global model for the modern atmosphere suggest that Δ17 O of atmospheric nitrate is unlikely to exceed about 30 [per thousand] in the western United States [37]. If the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in UFG samples has Δ17 O values of 30 [per thousand] or lower, the error in our δ15 N results is no more than 1.6 [per thousand]. The N isotopic compositions are reported in δ-notation relative to atmospheric N2(g) . Reproducibility for triplicate analysis of USGS34 was ±0.27[per thousand] (one standard deviation).
After filtration with 0.45 μm disposable polysulfone filters, a modified ion chromatography procedure for low ionic strength samples was used for the analysis of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] [38]. A Dionex DX-120 was configured with a 250 μL loop to increase instrument sensitivity. Ten percent of each sample batch consisted of quality control standards. Seven-point calibration curves covering the range of solutes being measured were run daily. Each batch contained sets of blanks (18.2 megaohm deionized water) and a series of USGS standard water reference samples (SRWS) at intervals of approximately every 10 ice-core samples. SRWS and blanks were monitored during sample runs. If the SRWS were not within 10% of expected values or the blanks were above detection limits, the sample run results were rejected and repeated.
All chemical data from the ice-core analyses can be found in additional file 1.
Additional file 1
Supporting data . Isotopic and anion data used in the study
Click here for file
Results and Discussion
Ice-core chronology
Tritium, chloride-36, and carbon-14 age-dating methods [23-39] were combined with the timing of major volcanic eruption signals that were evident in the core [26] to establish an ice-core chronology. The polynomial fit for the age-depth profile in the ice core [26] was determined to be
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
where D is depth below glacier surface, in m. This age-depth profile is in excellent agreement with known time horizons in the ice core that include (1) 1963 tritium and 1958 chloride-36 peaks from above-ground nuclear testing; (2) 1883 Krakatau volcanic eruption; (3) 1815 Tambora volcanic eruption; and (4) 1729 (± 95 years) carbon-14 age date of an insect leg entrapped in the ice (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ).
Figure 2
Plot of reported volcanic events and isotopic age dates used to generate a polynomial fit for an age-depth profile of the Upper Fremont Glacier ice core collected in 1991 [26], Wind River Range, Wyoming
Plot of reported volcanic events and isotopic age dates used to generate a polynomial fit for an age-depth profile of the Upper Fremont Glacier ice core collected in 1991 [26], Wind River Range, Wyoming . A slightly modified age-depth profile was developed for the 1998 ice core (DH-98-4) to account for the additional snow deposited between 1991 and 1998.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Variation of δ34 S in ice
Seven composite ice-core samples and one snow sample collected from UFG were analyzed for δ34 S (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). The ice-core samples represent a time period from approximately 1946 to 1988 and δ34 S values in the ice ranged from 5.1 to 8.1 [per thousand]. Sulfate in snow and corresponding glacier ice can be derived from a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources such as sea-salt aerosols, biogenic emissions, entrained dust particles, fossil fuel combustion, and metal smelting. Volcanic eruptions can also provide an intermittent short-term source of atmospheric [figure omitted; refer to PDF] . The highest δ34 S value in the UFG ice-core samples was associated with snow deposited primarily during 1980, coinciding with the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, Washington, during May 1980. Comparison of the δ34 S value in the ice core (8.1 [per thousand]) with a mean δ34 S value of volcanic ash from the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens (8.3 [per thousand]) [40] indicates a similar isotopic composition. Corresponding geochemical signatures of the 1980 Mt. St. Helens volcanic eruption in the UFG ice-core samples include elevated Hg concentrations [27] and elevated electrical conductivity, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] , and Cl- [26]. Ice samples collected from a 1980 deposition horizon on Knifepoint Glacier, approximately 4 km southwest of UFG, contained ash material that had morphology and chemical composition similar to Mt. St. Helens ash [20].
Figure 3
Comparison of δ34 S in ice-core and snow samples collected from Upper Fremont Glacier with δ34 S values of potential sulfate sources to the Wind River Range, Wyoming
Comparison of δ34 S in ice-core and snow samples collected from Upper Fremont Glacier with δ34 S values of potential sulfate sources to the Wind River Range, Wyoming . Data for comparisons compiled from [5-45].
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Except for the elevated δ34 S value in the layer corresponding to atmospheric deposition from Mt. St. Helens, the remaining δ34 S values in the ice-core samples ranged from 5.1 to 6.8 [per thousand] (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). The δ34 S values in the UFG ice core were substantially enriched relative to biogenic [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources (-2.4 [per thousand]) [41] and massive sulfide deposits in Arizona (0 [per thousand]) [42]. The δ34 S values of massive sulfide deposits were assumed to be representative of smelter emissions associated with ore processing in Arizona and New Mexico [5]. Marine aerosols, which have a δ34 S value of +20 [per thousand] [5], could not be a large source of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] to UFG due to the much lighter δ34 S isotopic values found in the ice.
The WRR and UFG are in close proximity to large expanses of arid and semi-arid lands composed of soils, sedimentary rocks, and dry lakebeds containing gypsum and anhydrite [5]. Therefore, dry deposition of dust on the surface of UFG during the summer and dust solute sources associated with snow deposition could comprise a large natural [figure omitted; refer to PDF] source and corresponding isotopic signal. Marine and non-marine evaporites have δ34 S values that range from +9 to +33 [per thousand] [43] and are much heavier relative to δ34 S values found in UFG ice-core samples (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). Median δ34 S values of water soluble [figure omitted; refer to PDF] from dry lake beds in arid regions of the southwestern US are +7.5 [per thousand] [44], slightly enriched relative to non-volcanic δ34 S values in the UFG ice core. Based on the isotopic composition of snowpack [figure omitted; refer to PDF] samples collected from high-elevation sites in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado from 1993 to 1999, it was concluded that soils and lakebeds were not dominant [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources [5]. The mean δ34 S of snow collected from Wyoming during 1993-1999 had the same δ34 S as a snow sample collected from the surface of UFG in 2001 (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). This suggests that soils and lakebeds are not dominant [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources; however, two of the δ34 S samples (mid-1960s and mid-1970s) may reflect contributions from lake-bed sulfate.
Coal from southern Wyoming, commonly used in electricity-producing power plants in close proximity to UFG, has a mean δ34 S composition of 5.1 [per thousand] for organic S [45], similar in isotopic composition to the δ34 S values in ice-core samples from UFG (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). Assuming limited isotopic fractionation during coal combustion, the δ34 S isotopic composition in the ice-core samples indicates that coal-fired powerplant emissions could be a dominant source of S deposition to high-elevation areas of the WRR. Based on U.S. emissions data compiled for 1998, electric utilities contributed the majority of SO2 emissions, representing 68% of total national SO2 emissions [46]. Coal combustion comprised over 90% of electric utility emissions on a national scale.
Variation of δ15 N in ice
Seven composite ice-core samples representing the time period of deposition from 1951 to 1988 were collected from UFG and analyzed for δ15 N in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). The δ15 N values in the ice were all negative and had similar isotopic composition, ranging from -5.9 to -3.2 [per thousand]. Nitrate in snow and corresponding glacier ice can be derived from a variety of natural (lightning, biogenic soil processes, and wildfires) and anthropogenic sources (generation of electricity, industrial processes, and vehicle exhaust) [14]. The mean δ15 N value in the UFG ice-core samples (-4.0 [per thousand], n = 7) was equal to the mean δ15 N value of six archived precipitation samples collected during 2000 at NADP/NTN site WY98 (C. Kendall, U.S. Geological Survey, written commun., 2008). The similarity in mean δ15 N values between the ice-core and NADP samples suggests similar [figure omitted; refer to PDF] source(s).
Figure 4
Comparison of δ15 N in ice-core samples collected from Upper Fremont Glacier with δ15 N values of potential nitrate sources and site-specific data collected from Wyoming NADP/NTN site WY98
Comparison of δ15 N in ice-core samples collected from Upper Fremont Glacier with δ15 N values of potential nitrate sources and site-specific data collected from Wyoming NADP/NTN site WY98 . Data for comparisons compiled from [47-50], and C. Kendall, USGS, written commun., 2008.
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Ice-core δ15 N values were compared with δ15 N values from potential NOX sources from previously published data (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). Although δ15 N values from coal deposits in the western U.S. were not available, ice-core δ15 N values were substantially lighter than δ15 N values of NOX from coal-fired powerplants in South Africa [47], simulated lightning [48], or kerogen in North American coal deposits [49]. Ice-core δ15 N values were significantly enriched relative to soil-released biogenic NO values [50]. The δ15 N of the ice-core samples all fall within the δ15 N values expected from vehicle emissions [47-50]. Based on national NOX emission data compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [46], on- and off-road vehicle emissions comprised 53% of NOX emissions during 1998 as opposed to electrical generation (25%) and industrial combustion (12%). Data compiled for the western United States indicate that on- and off-road mobile sources comprise 67% of the anthropogenic NOx emissions, with stationary sources comprising only 22% of the anthropogenic NOx emissions [51]. Based on the comparisons of the tightly constrained UFG ice-core δ15 N values with existing end-member data, it appears likely that vehicular NOX emissions may have a large impact on [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources in snowfall deposited in the WRR of Wyoming.
The ice-core results conflict with a recent study in the more densely populated eastern United States where it was found that NOx emissions from stationary sources were strongly correlated with spatial variation of δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) in wet deposition [14]. One possible reason for the observed discrepancy with the ice-core results could be the lower number of stationary NOx sources in the western United States to support the lower population density. Additional δ15 N values of NOX emissions from regional biogenic sources, as well as natural gas production facilities and coal-fired power plants in the western U.S. are needed to better assess [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources.
Reconstruction of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition
In addition to the S and N isotope data, the ice-core samples were used to provide an archive of annual [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition amounts that could be used to qualitatively extend the NADP/NTN records to the early-1950s. Dissolved (0.45 μm) [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] concentrations from the 1998 ice-core samples (site DH-98-4) were used in combination with the average ice-core density value of 0.90 g/cm3 (n = 12) to calculate deposition masses in kilograms/hectare (kg/ha). The age of each ice-core sample from site DH-98-4 was determined from the modified age-depth profile developed for the 1991 ice core to account for the additional snow deposited between 1991 and 1998. Once an age was assigned to each ice-core sample, the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] masses from the same year were summed to represent an annual deposition mass that could be directly compared to the NADP/NTN deposition data from sites WY06 and WY98 [52]. Annual [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] masses in kg/ha were calculated for snow deposited on UFG from 1951 through 1993 (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ).
Figure 5
Nitrate (A) and sulfate (B) annual wet deposition at NADP/NTN sites WY06 and WY98 and total deposition calculated from ice core DH-98-4 compared to total U.S. emissions of NOx (A) and SO2 (B) from 1950 to 1998 [46]
Nitrate (A) and sulfate (B) annual wet deposition at NADP/NTN sites WY06 and WY98 and total deposition calculated from ice core DH-98-4 compared to total U.S. emissions of NOx (A) and SO2 (B) from 1950 to 1998 [46].
[figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Comparison of the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] wet deposition data from the NADP/NTN sites to UFG data suggests that [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition in the WRR may have been less prior to 1980 (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). During the time period of overlapping [figure omitted; refer to PDF] data there is some general agreement between UFG and NADP/NTN annual deposition masses (i.e. 1985, 1988, 1992, 1993, and 1994). Other years of overlapping data indicate substantially less annual [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition from the ice-core record relative to NADP/NTN sites WY06 and WY98 (i.e. 1982, 1983, 1984, 1990, and 1991).
A number of reasons may explain the time periods when [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition rates recorded in the UFG ice core were different than the measured deposition rates at the NADP/NTN sites. At 4,000 m ASL, the UFG ice-coring site is subject to wind erosion of previously deposited snow and the corresponding [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition mass. An on-site snow depth sensor on UFG was used in combination with snow-density measurements to document significant snow removal by wind events after deposition [25]. Data collected on UFG during 1999-2000 indicated that the snow removal events were less during the spring, likely due to warmer air temperatures, resulting in higher-density snowfall. At an elevation of 4 km ASL, UFG is subject to free tropospheric and sometimes stratospheric air, increasing the likelihood of receiving atmospheric deposition from hemispheric sources relative to the lower elevation NADP/NTN sites. The NOx produced from the oxidation of nitrous oxide in the stratosphere should contain a δ15 N of ~ 19 [per thousand] [35], which is significantly enriched relative to the δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) values observed in the UFG ice-core samples (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ).
Post-depositional elution of solutes from the snowpack deposited on UFG could also contribute to lower [figure omitted; refer to PDF] masses relative to similar time periods at the NADP/NTN sites. However, chemical and isotopic analyses of ice from both cores indicate the low-resolution preservation of historical records of environmental change, including above-ground nuclear weapons testing, air temperature, volcanic eruptions, and the chemical quality of atmospheric deposition such as sub-μg/L concentrations of atmospheric mercury [20-27].
The deposition data from UFG (1951 through 1993) indicates an increasing trend in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition until approximately 1980 (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). Beginning in 1980, both the NADP/NTN (1980 to 2006) sites and the UFG data indicate slightly decreasing to stable [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition. During the time period of overlapping [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition data from both UFG and NADP/NTN sites, there is only one year where similar deposition masses occur (1986). All remaining years of overlapping data indicate substantially less annual [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition from the ice-core record relative to the NADP/NTN sites. Similar processes controlling [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition also are likely affecting the annual [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition rates on UFG relative to the NADP/NTN sites.
The annual [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition data from UFG was compared with total U.S. emissions of NOX and SO2 from 1950 to 1998 (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) as compiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Although this comparison does not address the overall higher NOX and SO2 emissions in the eastern U.S. relative to Wyoming deposition rates, it does provide a historical perspective on the initiation of the NADP/NTN program relative to total emission amounts. The effect of sharply increasing NOX and SO2 emissions from 1950 to the mid-1970s occurred before the beginning of the NADP/NTN program; however, the UFG ice-core samples provide a record of the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition effects during this time of increasing emissions (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ). Although post-depositional elution processes may have decreased the total [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] masses, the trends in deposition from 1950 to the mid-1970s appear to reflect the sharply increasing U.S. emissions data during this same time period. The NADP/NTN program sites in Wyoming were initiated after the peak national SO2 emissions in 1973 and substantially smaller annual NOX emissions after 1978. The decrease in U.S. SO2 emissions after the early-1970s is not reflected by the UFG ice-core data (figure [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ).
Given the observed increase in [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition in the UFG ice-core samples since the mid-1940s, it is unclear why no distinctive temporal trend in the isotopic composition is observed during the same time period. This may suggest that most of the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition to the WRR since the mid-1940s has been dominated by anthropogenic inputs from a common source and any increases in deposition amounts contain similar isotopic signatures. Additional reasons for the lack of an isotopic trend could include: (1) limited period of record starting after the existence of anthropogenic inputs; (2) large sample composites for isotope samples covering multiple years of deposition that mask finer scale trends evident in the [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition data; (3) varying deposition amounts from local, regional, and global sources; and (4) isotopic fractionation from postdepositional processes in the firn and ice. Additional studies are needed to assess the impact of postdepostional processes on the preservation of δ34 S ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) and δ15 N ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) values at the UFG coring site. Recent work at the Summit site, Greenland, found a potentially minimal influence of photolysis on the isotopic composition of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in firn and ice, in part due to high accumulation rates [18].
Isotopic analyses from other sections of the UFG ice core (including pre-industrial) would provide additional insight into the existence of isotopic trends. Unfortunately, the low concentration of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] combined with an insufficient amount of ice-core samples representing atmospheric deposition prior to ~ 1945 does not allow for sufficient sample mass to support S and N isotopic analyses. Despite this short-coming, results from these ice-core data provide insight to the long-term wet deposition of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] in pristine areas of the western United States that were previously not available.
Summary
Glaciers in the WRR present a unique opportunity to couple short-term (1980 to present) NADP/NTN data trends in the chemistry of atmospheric deposition with longer-term data, including stable isotope data, preserved in glacial ice. The δ34 S values in seven ice-core samples representing snowfall deposited from approximately 1946 to 1988 were similar, ranging from 5.1 to 8.1 [per thousand]. The highest δ34 S value in the UFG ice-core samples was associated with snow deposited primarily during 1980 and coincident with the eruption of Mt. St. Helens, Washington, during May 1980. The measured δ34 S value of 8.1 [per thousand] in the ice core was in close agreement with the mean δ34 S value of 8.3 [per thousand] of volcanic ash from the 1980 eruption. The remaining δ34 S values from ice-core samples were substantially enriched relative to biogenic [figure omitted; refer to PDF] sources and slightly depleted relative to δ34 S values of water-soluble [figure omitted; refer to PDF] from dry lake beds in arid regions of the southwestern United States. Coal used in power plants in close proximity to UFG was similar in δ34 S isotopic composition suggesting that power plant emissions may be a dominant source of S deposition to the WRR.
The mean δ15 N value in the UFG ice-core samples (-4.0 [per thousand], n = 7) was equal to the mean δ15 N value of six archived precipitation samples collected during 2000 at NADP/NTN site WY98, suggesting similar [figure omitted; refer to PDF] source(s). Ice-core δ15 N values were substantially depleted relative to δ15 N values of NOX from coal-fired powerplants, North American kerogen deposits, or simulated lightning and were substantially enriched relative to soil-released N. The ice-core samples were similar in isotopic composition to δ15 N values measured from vehicle emissions. This similarity in isotopic composition is consistent with NOX emission data compiled for the U.S. during 1998 that indicates vehicle emissions as the dominant source of NOX .
Comparison of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] wet deposition data from the NADP/NTN sites to UFG data suggests an increasing trend in annual deposition from 1950 to the installation of the NADP/NTN sites in western Wyoming during the early-1980s. Post-depositional elution processes may have decreased the total [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] masses preserved in UFG ice-core samples; however, the ice-core deposition data reflect the sharply increasing U.S. emissions from 1950 to the mid-1970s. Integration of the UFG ice-core data with the existing NADP/NTN data provides a longer-term, yet more qualitative, historical perspective on atmospheric deposition in the WRR.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
DN conceived the study, designed and coordinated study execution, assisted with sample processing, and drafted the manuscript. PS assisted in the design and execution of the study, assisted with sample processing, carried out the anion analyses, and assisted with the interpretation of the data. CJ carried out the isotopic analyses and provided assistance in drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
Use of brand names in this article is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the USGS. Funding for this study was provided by the USGS and National Atmospheric Deposition/National Trends Network. Analytical assistance by Craig A. Stricker and Cayce A. Gulbransen during the isotopic analyses is greatly appreciated. The sharing of isotopic data derived from monitoring sites in Wyoming by Carol Kendall is gratefully acknowledged. The manuscript was improved substantially from technical reviews by Philip Gardner and Anthony Ranalli (U.S. Geological Survey), Tyler Cruickshank (Utah Department of Environmental Quality), and two anonymous reviewers.
[1] Fenn M, Haeuber R, Tonnesen G, Baron J, Grossman-Clarke S, Hope D, Jaffe D, Copeland S, Geiser L, Rueth H, Sickman J, Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United StatesIn BioScience,2003,53:391-403.
[2] Ingersoll G, Mast M, Nanus L, Handran H, Manthorne D, Hultstrand D, Rocky Mountain snowpack chemistry at selected sitesIn US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1045,200715
[3] , Bureau of Land Management: Jonah infill drilling project, final Environmental Impact Statement Note: accessed February 2011.
[4] Nilles M, Conley B, Changes in the chemistry of precipitation in the United States, 1981-1998In Water Air Soil Pollut,2001,130:409-414.
[5] Mast M, Turk J, Ingersoll G, Clow D, Kester C, Use of stable isotopes to identify sources of sulfate in Rocky Mountain snowpacksIn Atmos Environ,2001,35:3303-3313.
[6] Kruetz K, Sholkovitz E, Major element, rare earth element, and sulfur isotopic composition of a high elevation firn core: Sources and transport of mineral dust in central AsiaIn Geochem Geophys Geosyst 1,2000 Note: Paper number 2000GC000082.
[7] Patris N, Delmas R, Legrand M, Angelis M, Ferron F, Stievenard M, Jouzel J, First sulfur isotope measurements in central Greenland ice cores along the preindustrial and industrial periodsIn J Geophys Res,2002,107:4115-4120.
[8] Patris D, Delmas R, Jouzel J, Isotopic signatures of sulfur in shallow Antarctic ice coresIn J Geophys Res,2002,105:7071-7078.
[9] Jonsell U, Hansson M, Morth C, Torssander P, Sulfur isotopic signals in two shallow ice cores from Dronning Maud Land, AntarcticaIn Tellus,2005,57B:341-350.
[10] Alexander B, Thiemens M, Farquhar J, Kaufman A, Savarino J, Delmas R, East Antarctic ice core sulfur isotope measurements over a complete glacial-interglacial cycleIn J Geophys Res,2003,108:4786-4793.
[11] Pruett L, Kruetz K, Wadleigh M, Mayewski P, Kurbatov A, Sulfur isotopic measurements from a West Antarctic ice core: Implications for sulfate source and transportIn Ann Glac,2004,39:161-168.
[12] Sowers T, Rodebaugh A, Yoshida N, Toyoda S, Extending records of the isotopic composition of the atmospheric N2 O back to 1800 A.D. from air trapped in snow at the South Pole and the Greenland Ice Sheet Project II ice coreIn Global Biogeochem Cycles,2002,16:1129-1138.
[13] Rahn T, Wahlen M, A reassessment of the global isotopic budget of atmospheric nitrous oxideIn Global Biogeochem Cycles,2000,14:537-543.
[14] Elliott E, Kendall C, Wankel S, Burns D, Boyer E, Harlin K, Bain D, Butler T, Nitrogen isotopes as indicators of NOx source contributions to atmospheric nitrate deposition across the midwestern and northeastern United StatesIn Environ Sci Technol,2007,41:7661-7667.
[15] Freyer H, Kobel K, Delmas R, Kley D, Legrand M, First results of 15 N/14 N ratios in nitrate from alpine and polar coresIn Tellus Ser B,1996,48B:93-105.
[16] Hastings M, Jarvis J, Steig E, Anthropogenic impacts on nitrogen isotopes of ice-core nitrateIn Science,2009,324:1288
[17] Frey M, Savarino J, Morin S, Erbland J, Martins J, Photolysis imprint in the nitrate stable isotope signal in snow and atmosphere of East Antarctica and implications for reactive nitrogen cyclingIn Atmos Chem,2009,9:8681-8696.
[18] Jarvis J, Hastings M, Steig E, Kunasek S, Isotopic ratios in gas-phase HNO3 at Summit, GreenlandIn J Geophys Res,2009,114:17301-17314.
[19] Rothlisberger R, Hutterli M, Wolff E, Mulvaney R, Fischer H, Bigler M, Goto-Azuma K, Hansson M, Ruth U, Siggaard-Andersen M, Steffensen J, Nitrate in Greenland and Antarctica ice cores: a detailed description of postdepositional processesIn Ann Glaciol,2002,35:209-216.
[20] Naftz D, Rice J, Ranville J, Glacial-ice composition--A potential long-term record of the chemistry of atmospheric deposition, Wind River Range, WyomingIn Water Resour Res,1991,27:1231-1238.
[21] Naftz D, Ice-core records of the chemical quality of atmospheric deposition and climate from mid-latitude glaciers, Wind River Range, WyomingIn Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado,1993 Note: Ph.D. thesis
[22] Naftz D, Schuster P, Reddy M, Assessment of spatial variability of major-ion concentrations and δ18 O values in surface snow, Upper Fremont Glacier, Wyoming, U.S.AIn Nordic Hydrology,1994,25:371-388.
[23] Naftz D, Klusman R, Michel R, Schuster P, Reddy M, Taylor H, Yanosky T, McConnaughey E, Little Ice Age evidence from a south-central North American ice core, U.S.AIn Arct Alp Res,1996,28:35-41.
[24] Naftz D, Susong D, Schuster P, Cecil L, Dettinger M, Michel R, Kendall C, Ice-core evidence of rapid air temperature increases since 1960 in alpine areas of the Wind River Range, Wyoming, United StatesIn J Geophys Res,2002,107:4171-4186.
[25] Naftz D, Susong D, Cecil L, Schuster P, Variations between δ18 O in recently deposited snow and onsite air temperature, Upper Fremont Glacier, WyomingIn Earth Paleoenvironments: Records Preserved in Mid- and Low-Latitude Glaciers Edited by: Cecil L, Green J, Thompson L Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York,2004,9:217-234.
[26] Schuster P, White D, Naftz D, Cecil L, Chronological refinement of an ice core record at upper Fremont Glacier in south central North AmericaIn J Geophys Res,2000,105:4657-4666.
[27] Schuster P, Krabbenhoft D, Naftz D, Cecil L, Olson M, Dewild J, Susong D, Green J, Atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270 years: A glacial ice core of natural and anthropogenic sourcesIn Environ Sci Technol,2002,36:2303-2310.
[28] Giesemann A, Jager H, Norman A, Krouse H, Brand W, On-line sulfur isotope determination using an elemental analyzer coupled to a mass spectrometerIn Anal Chem,1994,66:2816-2819.
[29] Coplen T, Hopple J, Bohlke J, Peiser H, Rieder S, Krouse H, Rosman K, Ding T, Vocke R, Revesz K, Lamberty A, Taylor P, De Bievre P, Compilation of minimum and maximum isotope ratios of selected elements in naturally occurring terrestrial materials and reagents,200298 Note: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4222
[30] Sigman D, Casciotti K, Andreani M, Barford C, Galanter M, Bohlke J, A bacterial method for the nitrogen isotopic analysis of nitrate in seawater and freshwaterIn Anal Chem,2001,73:4145-4153.
[31] Casciotti K, Sigman D, Hastings M, Bohlke J, Hikert A, Measurement of the oxygen isotopic composition of nitrate in seawater and freshwater using the denitrifier methodIn Anal Chem,2002,74:4905-4912.
[32] Michalski G, Scott Z, Kabiling M, Thiemens M, First measurements and modeling of δ17 O in atmospheric nitrateIn Geophys Res Lett,2003,30:1870-1873.
[33] Coplen T, Bohlke J, Casciotti K, Using dual-bacterial denitrification to improve δ15 N determinations of nitrates containing mass-independent 17 OIn Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom,2004,18:245-250.
[34] Michalski G, Bohlke J, Thiemens M, Long term atmospheric deposition as the source of nitrate and other salts in the Atacama Desert, Chile: New evidence from mass-independent oxygen isotopic compositionsIn Geochim Cosmochim Acta,2004,68:4023-4038.
[35] Savarino J, Kaiser J, Morin S, Sigman D, Thiemens T, Nitrogen and oxygen isotopic constraints on the origin of atmospheric nitrate in coastal AntarcticaIn Atmos Chem Phys,2007,7:1925-1945.
[36] Morin S, Savarino J, Frey M, Yan N, Bekki S, Bottenheim J, Martins J, Tracing the origin and fate of NOx in the Arctic atmosphere using stable isotopes in nitrateIn Science,2008,322:730-732.
[37] Alexander B, Hastings M, Allman D, Dachs J, Thornton J, Kunasek S, Quantifying atmospheric nitrate formation pathways based on a global model of the oxygen isotopic composition (Δ17 O) of atmospheric nitrateIn Atmos Chem Phys,2007,9:5043-56.
[38] Fishman M, Friedman L, Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments545 Note: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations 1989, Book 5, Chap. A1
[39] Cecil L, Vogt S, Identification of bomb-produced chlorine-36 in mid-latitude glacial ice of North AmericaIn Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B,1997,123:287-289.
[40] Bindeman I, Eiler J, Wing B, Farquhar J, Rare sulfur and triple oxygen isotope geochemistry of volcanogenic sulfate aerosolsIn Geochim Cosmochim Acta,2007,71:2326-2343.
[41] Nriagu J, Holdway D, Coker R, Biogenic sulfur and the acidity of rainfall in remote areas of CanadaIn Science,1987,237:1189-1192.
[42] Eastoe C, Bustin M, Hurlbut D, Orr R, Sulfur isotopes in Early Proterozoic volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits - new data from Arizona and implications for ocean chemistryIn Precambrian Res,1990,46:353-364.
[43] Claypool G, Holser W, Kaplan I, Sakai H, Zak I, The age curves of sulfur and oxygen isotopes in marine sulfate and their mutual interpretationIn Chem Geol,1980,28:199-260.
[44] Schlesinger W, Peterjohn W, Ion and sulfate-isotope ratios in arid soils subject to wind erosion in the southwestern USAIn Soil Sci Soc Am J,1988,52:54-58.
[45] Hackley C, Anderson T, Sulfur isotopic variations in low-sulfur coals from the Rocky Mountain regionIn Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1986,50:1703-1713.
[46] , National air pollutant emission trends, 1900 - 1998 Research Triangle Park, NC,2000 Note: EPA-454/R-00-002,
[47] Heaton T, 15 N/14 N ratios of NOx from vehicle engines and coal-fired power stationsIn Tellus Ser B,1990,42B:304-307.
[48] Hoering T, The isotopic composition of ammonia and nitrate ion in rainIn Geochim Cosmochim Acta,1957,12:7-102.
[49] Boudou J, Schimmelmann A, Ader M, Mastalerz M, Sebilo M, Léon G, Organic nitrogen chemistry during low-grade metamorphismIn Geochim Cosmochim Acta,2008,72:1199-1221.
[50] Li D, Wang X, Nitrogen isotopic signature of soil-released nitric oxide (NO) after fertilizer applicationIn Atmos Envrion,2008,42:4747-4754.
[51] Fenn M, Haeuber R, Tonnesen G, Baron J, Grossman-Clarke S, Hope D, Jaffe D, Copeland S, Geiser L, Rueth H, Sickman J, Nitrogen emissions, deposition, and monitoring in the western United StatesIn BioScience,2003,53:391-403.
[52] , National Atmospheric Deposition Program: NADP/NTN wet deposition data for Wyoming Note: accessed February 2011.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2011 Naftz et al; licensee Chemistry Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Abstract: Ice-core samples from Upper Fremont Glacier (UFG), Wyoming, were used as proxy records for the chemical composition of atmospheric deposition. Results of analysis of the ice-core samples for stable isotopes of nitrogen (δ15 N, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) and sulfur (δ34 S, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), as well as [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] deposition rates from the late-1940s thru the early-1990s, were used to enhance and extend existing National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NADP/NTN) data in western Wyoming. The most enriched δ34 S value in the UFG ice-core samples coincided with snow deposited during the 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens, Washington. The remaining δ34 S values were similar to the isotopic composition of coal from southern Wyoming. The δ15 N values in ice-core samples representing a similar period of snow deposition were negative, ranging from -5.9 to -3.2 [per thousand] and all fall within the δ15 N values expected from vehicle emissions. Ice-core nitrate and sulfate deposition data reflect the sharply increasing U.S. emissions data from 1950 to the mid-1970s.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer