Full text
Figure 1. Typical components required to develop a companion diagnostic, separate from drug development. This is not applicable to laboratory-developed 'home brew'tests, such as the CCR5 tropism assay.
(Figure omitted. See article PDF.)
Figure 2. Proposed codevelopment of pharmaceuticals and companion diagnostics. Pharma: Pharmaceutical; PMA: Prospective meta-analysis.
(Figure omitted. See article PDF.)
Figure 3. Challenges associated with the codevelopment of companion diagnostics.
(Figure omitted. See article PDF.)
Figure 4. The traditional roles biopharmaceutical companies play in personalized medicine, if a contract research organization is used. CRO: Contract research organizations.
(Figure omitted. See article PDF.)
Figure 5. Various services offered by an integrated partner, with all services housed within one organization.
(Figure omitted. See article PDF.)
The goal of personalized medicine, to effectively customize diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease to one's genetic composition, is one that has been known and sought for many years. Increasingly, molecular companion diagnostics based on one's inherited or somatic biomarkers are desired to ensure the effective, safe development and application of a personalized drug. This has been reflected in several recent guidance documents from regulatory organizations worldwide, and in a number of instances, the use of a companion diagnostic has been required or recommended prior to administration of a personalized therapeutic.
There have been a number of successes in personalized medicine, but not as many as one might expect based on the historical level of interest [1]. Proposed regulatory documents have attempted to address this shortfall, and in doing so have identified the drug-diagnostic codevelopment process as critical to the success of personalized medicine. Unfortunately, the codevelopment process poses several challenges. Potential barriers are: a relatively low probability of success after a scientific discovery is made; navigating various development objectives for different drugs, targeting appropriate markets and users; the lack of clear regulatory and policy guidance; and partnership challenges between research and diagnostic cultures. Consequently, pharmaceutical and diagnostic companies may be less motivated to invest the substantial amount of time and resources needed to create a successful personalized therapeutic.
The promise & power of personalized medicine
The field of personalized medicine evolved from the discipline of pharmacogenetics, essentially expanding upon the goal of identifying the right treatment, at the right dose, for the right disease/patient [2,3]. Utilizing a stratified approach...
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





