Abstract: Limited access to quality and quantity electricity has remained an unresolved scourge in Nigeria. The ravage cuts across all electric energy utilization sectors in the nation most especially in the residential sector. This study highlights the sources of electric power supply, utilization features and effects of electricity deficits in Obantoko residents. A total of 124 households interviewed were selected using systematic random sampling techniques. This comprises of room(s), flat and duplex apartment inhabitants. The findings showed that despite the national grid connection, a significant number of households own and operate generators due to electricity shortfalls in the area. This essentially hamper domestic activities in various homes. The effects on several households includes interruption of work, home discomfort, consequential effect on performance, increase expenditure, undue wastage, stress due to manual/mechanical household works and enjoyment/pleasure disruption. The salvaging role of private generators as an alternative source of power supply does not seem to significantly address the problem of electric power insufficiency in Nigeria as it poses its own challenges. There is therefore the need for improvement of the public source of power supply and adoption of other private alternative sources of electricity supply that have reduced operating cost and health implication
Keywords: Electricity, Household, Energy, Consumption, Source
1. INTRODUCTION
Electricity has over the decade become extensively used in all areas of human endeavour viz administrative, industrial, commercial, and residential areas. Records of established sections where the involvement of electricity has presumed a norm ranges from homes, health care delivery, social services, industry, education, agriculture through to defense and of course in some nations, transportation [1], Energy supply has become the next important ingredient for living after air and water [2], A considerable number of studies found in literature buttressed that electricity is one of the most important basic necessities for living [3-10], Among industrial, commercial and residential electricity consumption sectors, residential utilizations have been observed to have the highest share of electricity consumption, which also varies with location [11-14], Statistical analysis of electricity consumption (Mega Watts per h) in Nigerian which covers from 1970 - 2004 showed that electricity consumption in the residential sector has consistently dominated other sector from 1978 [15], Ekpo et al., [15] also observed that as residential electricity consumption rises, the industrial sector continues to fall. Domestic activities such as cooking, refrigerating, washing, ironing, lighting, entertainment, air conditioning, pumping of water etc., involves the use of electricity. Of the total electricity consumption in homes, kitchen, laundry appliances, preservation devices, lighting and home electronics are the main electricity users in a household [16], Pelesai and ThankGod, [17] stated that Nigerians increasingly buy electrical appliances to consume the power (energy) produced by different sources such as national power grid, chemical batteries, generators and solar panels. Residential electricity consumption has a number of varying factors contributing to the quantity of electricity used by each household, such as Income, price of electricity, degree__oL_urbanization and population variables (18-24). Other factors such as household size, age distribution of home residents, and climatic condition of an area also contribute to the household's electricity consumption [25-29, 15]. Suie et al., [30], added that the substantial energy utilization witnessed in household sector is caused by considerable energy loss attributable to the use of incandescent lamp.
2. CONSUMPTION CHARACTERISTIC OF ELECTRICITY IN HOMES
Residential electricity consumption has remained among the numerous sectors that contribute to the top hierarchy of electric power usage. The number of equipment and appliances own by a household differs significantly from that of another as well as in their respective utilization characteristics [31]. Individual household demand for electricity is a service derived demand from using different number of appliances and equipment [15, 31]. Appraisal of residential electricity consumption showed that almost half of household electricity is used for lighting, television, radio, air conditioning, refrigeration, ironing, and so on. With the rapid advancements in technological innovations alongside the growth in the domestic electric appliance industry, there seems to be no complete domestic task that does not involve the use of an electrically operated device in one way or the other. EPSERP [32] added that a considerable proportion of residential electricity consumed in Nigeria is by women through household chores and other non residential activities. The involvement of electricity in domestic chores has unreserved advantages in saving time, reduction of stress and energy conservation compared to the manual/mechanical processes. Middle and high-income consumers in urban areas together make up substantial residential electricity consumers. This consumer-class typically uses several household appliances and items that consumes much electric power, such as fridges, air conditioners, electric cookers, water heaters coupled with substantial amounts of light in their homes, [33], Where the large remaining residential consumers use electric power for lighting, [33], Over time, as the number of households grows, lifestyle change, more electric appliances are acquired [33, 15]. It is expected that the quantity of electricity generated will also change to keep up with the load. Odularu and Okonkwo [34] found out that as the real gross domestic product grows so do electricity consumption. Typical challenges with residential electricity is its continuous demand and usage, much of which is in the morning and evening hours, besides the other less consumption periods of the day. Thereby posing some kind difficulties in the provision of electricity in the residential sector, [33],
2.1. Quality and quantity of accessible electricity in the nigeria
The power sector of the Nigeria is marked by its erratic nature, frequent interruption, total blackout, insufficient power supply, etc. Power outages for about 26 days per month, which last eight hours per day experienced in Nigeria, is relatively worse than the regional and world average records, [35], 9% sales lost due to these disruptions and an average of about 97.1% of ownership and operation of private generators by business firms located in Nigeria explain the severity of power problems in the nation [11, 35], Wastage challenges encountered between the generation and distribution points, especially where installed capacities are far below transmitted plays pivotal role in the quantity and quality of accessible power in Nigeria [36, 37], Kazeem, [38] echoed that Nigeria has one of the highest transmission losses in the world with a record of 35% loss. The recent daily electricity loss recorded is about 2,993.7 megawatts (MW) [39], There has been several plans and projections to address the power insufficiency in the country, unfortunately the nation has never met any of her past energy demand projections. Electric power transmission and distribution losses in Nigeria covering 1971 - 2010 showed that Nigeria had her highest loss value of 49.27% of the output in 1981 and the lowest in 2009 with a value of 5.87% of the output. While the power transmission and distribution loss in kilowatt hour is 8.085 billion kWh in 2002 for maximum and a minimum value of 0.25 billion kWh in 1971 [40], Different administrations in Nigeria had witnessed this inadequate power generation and distribution challenges [41]. According to ECN, [42] several billion dollars of public investment has in the past decade gone into electricity generation and transmission capacity expansion, unfortunately the outcome contrasts sharply with the extremely frequent electric power interruption and voltage variation. Popoola et al. [43] revealed that the quality of electricity in Nigeria is below 10%. This meager supply of electricity in Nigeria as against the ever increasing demand of same has been a great challenge to the nation. World Bank and some foreign organizations report on countries with electricity access deficit, revealed that Nigeria is the second worst in electricity shortage. The report stated that 82.4 million out of the nation's population of 160 million people lack access to electricity [44], It was estimated that the supply shortfall is about 80% of the country's potential electricity demand [45], The total Installed capacity from both thermal and hydro electricity generating plants in Nigeria in 1999 was 5,860 MW and an available capacity of 5,400 MW while the effective capacity was about 1600 MW. Ten years after (2009) the total installed capacity of the generating plants rose to 7,876 MW out of which about 4,000 MW constituted available capacity and effective average daily generated capacity below 2,700 MW. In 2012 a peak of 4,517 MW was attained which latter dropped to 3,443 MW in 2013 [46], The recent installed capacity is about 10,000 MW within which available capacity of 6,668.6 MW was generated, where effective capacity of 3,400 MW or so is actually generated daily [39]. The challenges of electricity in Nigeria could be put as an outcome of technology, poor maintenance culture, old and insufficient installations, infrastructural decay, vandalism of electrical installations, fire incidents, poor funding, low tariffs, huge debts owed the electricity industry, irregularity of stream flow, power loss experienced from generation to distribution points, distance of generation point to the distribution and inaccurate forecast of electricity consumption determinants and patterns especially from its regional perspective [13, 26, 34, 37, 39, 47-50],
2.2. Power supply potentials in NIGERIA
Nigeria as a nation is enormously endowed with large quantity of non-renewable and renewable primary sources of energy which if properly and substantially harnessed will achieve stability in energy supply to the nation. The country has an estimated natural gas reserve of 185 trillion cubic feet, 35 billion barrels of crude oil and 2.75 billion metric tones of coal reserves [37, 41, 51-54], According to Uzoma, [41] Nigeria is capable of producing an estimated total exploitable large-scale hydropower potential of 36,000 GWh of electricity annually. The daily electrical energy obtainable from the sun in Nigeria expressed in barrel is equivalent to 4.66 million barrels of oil per day [55], Other energy resources available for boasting electricity in Nigeria includes wind energy 2.0 - 4.0 m/s, biomass 144 million tons/year and wave and tidal energy 150,000 TJ/ (16.6 x 106 toe/yr) [52], All these massive primary energy resources for the generation of electricity in the country nothwithsanding, Nigeria currently depends on gas-fired thermal and hydropower stations for electricity generation [56-59], As a consequence, we creating a very wide gap between the electricity generated and the demand in the nation.
2.3. Prevalence of generators in residential sector
Erratic power supply and prolonged power outages experienced in the nation has grossly encouraged a significant percentage of residential and other non-residential electricity consumers to seek alternative sources of power supply [34, 60], In the event of power outages, private generating plants aid continuation of important electrical appliances where halting will severely affects activities [3], A large number of households, especially those residing in urban areas, though the figure is uncertain, rely on generators for their electricity needs. Estimated figures from the Global Business Intelligence in 2011 revealed that Nigerians spent about four hundred and fifty five million dollars on generators [39], The wide spread substitution of private for public provision of electricity explains why the residential electricity consuming class has taken over the electricity consumption leadership in Nigeria. Power interruption challenges for residential consumers are associated with some latent variables such as inconveniences, interference, disruption of housekeeping or leisure activities. Odularu and Okonkwo, [34] reiterated that electricity is necessary for the realization of uninterrupted comfort. The appalling part of owning and operating private generators includes its relative high operation cost, considerable power insufficiency and the accompanied health issue.
2.4. Power shortage: a conventionality or peculiarity
Electricity demand and supply mismatch is a widespread challenging issue. Most nations of the world strive to establish an efficient and effective power sector that will meet up with the ever increasing energy demand in various nations. Although power shortage is predominantly in developing countries, all nations of the world encounters electric power transmission and distribution losses, challenges which also affect the available electric power in these nations. Among different nations of the world, the United States tops the 2010 electric power transmission and distribution losses chart with a value of 260.999 billion kWh, where Nigeria occupies the fourty-fifth position with a value of 4.497 billion kWh. Electric power sector of West African countries are charaterized by low performance, limited access to electricity and endemic electric power shortages [45], Nigeria, Benin, Ghana, Mali, Togo, and Guinea rely significantly on hydroelectricity for power generation [33, 45] which severely affects the power generation in these nations during drought. The power demand in nations like Burkina Faso prompted seeks of electricity importation from neighboring countries [33], Senegal, Mali and Guinea suffered several years of frequent electricity disruptions owing to insufficient electricity generation capacities as well as low reliability of generating plants [45]. Senegal which mainly generates its own electricity from oil, has experienced frequent power plant outages because of low reliability and fuel procurement difficulties encountered. Outside Africa, India is the worst in electricity deficit as 306 million of Indian population had no access to electricity [43], Pakistan continual electricity shortages reached crisis proportions in 2013. The nation recorded light outs for at least 10 hours/day in major cities, and up to 22 hours/day in rural areas [61]. China, which today has excess available capacity to meet current electricity demand has in the past recorded three periods of nationwide power shortages which covers 1978 - 1996, 2003 - 2006 and 2008 [62], World Bank reported that over 50 million citizens of countries like Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Congo DR, India and Nigeria lack access to electricity [43],
2.5. RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND AND CONSUMPTION LITERATURES
A considerable number of studies have identified determinants of electricity demand both in developed and developing countries. Below is the classification of various studies as they correlate: Most of the studied literatures adopted development of models in the determination of electricity demand. These studies considered single or a combination of two or more of these variables; real income, electricity price, population growth, structural changes, climatic conditions, urbanization, efficiency improvement using either univariate cointegration approach, multivariate cointegration approach or bounds testing approach in their various studies [8, 15, 63-76], SocioDemographic factors such as population, urbanization, family size, age distribution, the number of wage earners in the household [15, 77-78], Experimental investigation of residential electricity demand for consumption conducted at the disaggregated level [8, 21, 64, 67, 70, 76, 79, 80-83], Analysis of electricity demand for accurate and substantial projection and policy analysis [36, 52],
3. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
Electricity utilization in a household depends on the available appliances and services in which these appliances are engaged in. it is not unusual to expect variation in the factors influencing the demand of electricity in different households. Electricity, like other utilities used in households, is not consumed directly by individuals. Rather, it is a service instigated demand from the energy required for running and operating various electrical appliances and equipment in the household [31]. In this view this study was designed to identify electricity utilisation features and the effects of power shortage challenges in the residential areas.
4. MATERIALS AND METHOD
This research designed to study electric power accessibility and consumption pattern in Obantoko, Ogun State, Nigeria was conducted from May 1 to July 31, 2013. Obantoko, a developing metropolis located at the out sketch of the ancient city of Abeokuta falls within Abeokuta South and Odeda local government areas of Ogun state [84, 85], The locality is generally characterized by undeveloped large parcels of land that typically separate buildings which are either used as farm lands or dumpsites [86], The building arrangement in this suburb includes linear, clustered and scattered settlement pattern as all is found in different areas with traces of assigned street names in some areas.
A pretested self administered questionnaire was used for data collection. The households in this study were selected using multi-staged random sampling technique with no exclusion criteria. The community was divided into two zones and further broken down into ten districts. Each of the districts was represented in the study. The response for each question on the questionnaire accommodated any member of the household with the empiric information for the home. A total of 124 households visited were considered appropriate for this study. Others were turned down due to refusal of various participated households to respond to the majority of the questions and absence of the person who could respond to most of the questions when visited. The questions included, sources of electricity for the home, duration of usage of various sources of power supply, the activities in which the supplied electric power are engaged in, effects of electricity deficit from public sources in the household and preference of power source among the available sources of electricity supply.
The data collected was analyzed in simple frequency and percentage format using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) 16.0 version and presented in table and charts.
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Obantoko population estimated to be 57,750 people in [85] survey was observed to be experiencing progressive population growth in the last eight years. 62 households representing 50% of the household participants are tenants, 58(46.8%) respondents own and live in their houses while 4(3.2%) household participants live in their family/relative house. The dwelling characteristics of the different households in the area includes room(s) 40(32.3%), flat 64(51.6%) and duplex 18(14.5%) apartments. Almost all the buildings 120(96.8%) are connected to the national grid This number contribute to the national population of less than 40% that are connected to the grid system which, according to Nigerian Energy Policy report, 2003 experience power shortage for over 60% of the time [87], High ownership and operation of private generators 108(87.1%) demonstrated the epileptic state of power supply in the area. The meager electricity supply condition in the area notwithstanding, the vast majority of Obantoko households 82(66.1%) rely on public source of electricity supply as their major source of electricity while generator serves as backup. This was a different case for 44(33.9%) households who observed that generator is their major source of electricity as they mostly engage generators in handling electricity demand services in their homes. This observation agreed with Elendu, [88] that unpredictable supply from national grid cause different households to opt for private source of electricity to ensure supplies in their homes. The predominant use of generator as private source of electricity observed is also in line with Kennedy-Darling et al [89], that generators running on diesel or gasoline are the common form of off-grid electricity supply. Similarly Idiata et ak, [90] found that 60% of the Nigerian population depend on generators for electricity supply. Tyler [92], survey also reported that 96 to 98% private generator ownership among rural firms despite the grid connection. The worst average duration of public electricity witnessed in the last six months were 30 min/day and lhr/day by 24(19.4%) and 20(16.1%) households respectively. There is no household, which observed public power supply above an average of 6hrs/day. This is relatively worse than the national average record of power outages for eight hours per day experienced in the nation [35],
Various views of public electricity supply in Obantoko metropolis varied widely. To 36 households representing 29% of the household participants, electricity supply in the area is fair. While to few 8(6.5%) it is excellent (Table 1).
In compensation for the much inaccessible quantity and quality of electricity in the metropolis, 54 households representing 43.5% household participants always run their generators whereas 40 households representing 32.3% of the household sometimes do. The length of usage recorded among these households ranges from less than one hour (Ihr) to 4 hrs and above. The largest proportion of the households 48(38.7%) use generators for 3 hrs on the daily basis. This was followed by 40(32.3%) households that run their generator for 4 hrs and above every day. Individual household demand for electricity is a service derived demand from using different number of appliances and equipment [15, 32], Figure 2 showed the various activities in which electricity is involved in, in Obantoko households. Among the services obtainable from electric utilities, lighting was the first and has continued to account for significant source of electricity consumption [92], Globally, almost l/5th of total electricity generated is consumed by lighting [93], ECN-UNDP, [94] work also showed that lighting is the second major energy-consuming activities in Nigerian households. The observation made in this study revealed that 21(16.9%) households mostly engage electric energy for illumination (lighting). This supports the report on global consumption that electric lighting accounted for 99% of the total light consumption [93], Electricity utility is also involved in the following three groups of activities namely cooking process 12(9.7%), pumping of water 11(8.9%) and housekeeping 8(6.5% (Figure 1). which in its absence are carried out either manually or manual/mechanically. Access to electric energy and electrically operated equipment reduces excessive workload, drudgery encountered and time involved in repetitive manual or manual/mechanical activities such as, washing clothes, pounding foods, grinding or milling food grains, fetching water etc. it was found in studies that static relaxation imposed on individuals especially women in repetitive tasks and bending involved in very frequent household activities causes shoulder pain, neck pain, and degeneration of spine [95, 96], In [96, 97] it was stated that working with the hands above shoulder height involved in some household chores like pounding is stressful and have the tendency of increasing risk impingement syndrome development.
The quantity and quality of electrical energy reaching the electricity consumers via distribution system in Nigeria is very poor. Various problems such as limited exploitation of power generation technology, inadequate power generation and high power losses faced by the power sector of the nation translate to voltage variations and electricity deficits witnessed in all sectors. Frequent interruption, especially at the peak of crucial activity instigated 26(21%) of the household participants to seek alterative source of power supply. To 46(37.1%) household participants, it is outright power supply outage, 22 households representing 17.7% of household participants use private source of power supply due to the low voltage of the supplied power from the public source. Whereas all the above factors coerced 14(11.3%) household participants into private power usage (Figure 2).
Generally, Ogun State has tropical climate. The mean monthly temperature ranges from 23°C in July to 32°C in February, while the rainy season lasts from March to November, followed by dry season [98], The temperature of the area makes the use of electric fans and air-conditioners essential for space cooling. The services of these space cooling appliances coupled with entertainment equipment enhances good relaxation and comfort 14(11.3%).
The benefits of electricity as found above in numerous household can turn out to be nightmarish in its absence. The erratic power supply in the Obantoko always and sometimes affect the residential activities of 30(24.2%) and 64(51%) of the household participants. In the face electricity outage all electrical appliances stop working, no fan, no air condition, no television, etc. this hinders many domestic activities. The predominant observed variable that electricity deficit effect on Obantoko dwellers is home discomfort 34(27.4%).
Fresh and perishable food products such as fish, meats, fruits, and vegetables can be preserved for several days, weeks or even months by cooling or freezing using refrigerators.
Altering the environmental conditions the food items, disarm and incapacitate the microorganisms which cause off-flavors and odors, slime production, changes in the texture and appearances, and the eventual spoilage of foods [99], Refrigerator use hinderance in Obantoko community results in undue wastage 12(9.7%) in households. Obvious food wastage in Nigeria is depicted in most refuse dumpsite throughout the nation. Researches [100, 101] observed that household waste and refuse dumpsite in Nigeria is characterized by substantial amount of food waste. Ogbonna et al. [101] echoed that food waste constitute 26.6% of total waste generated in a major city in Nigeria. Enj oyment/pleasure disruption 11(8.9%) and Interruption of work 20(16.1%) are other activities found to be affected by electricity deficit in Obantoko.
Frequent operation of private generators in various households constitute nuisance, health concern [3] and observed consequential effect on performance 9(7.3%). Besides the heath the issues, running cost of generator which involves refueling, maintenance and repair directly increases the proportion expenditure that goes to energy utilities in 16(12.9%) household participants. This agreed with Kennedy- Darling et al. [89], that private generators are more expensive to compare with the national power grid (Figure 3).
Among the various sources of electricity supply available for residential consumption, both on grid (national power grid) and off grid (generator, inverter and solar panel) sources, majority of Obantoko residents prefer the public source of electricity supply (national power grid) 84(67.7%) due to its relatively cheap cost, load capacity and health assurance.
6. CONCLUSIONS
The importance of electricity in the residential sector cannot be over emphasized. Virtually all domestic activities in the residential sectors involve the use of electricity. Unfortunately, the much needed electric power supply from the national grid which is also the major source of power supply is marked by its frequent interruption, total blackout, insufficient power and voltage variation. The effect of the electricity deficit in different households includes interruption of work, home discomfort, consequential effect on the performance, increase expenditure, undue wastage, stress due to manual/mechanical household chores and enjoyment/pleasure disrruption. In an attempt to alliviate these challenges private sources of electricity supply are obtained by different households. Among the various sources of private electricity generation technology available, generator was observed to be the predominant alternative source of power use in the community. This in turn presents another set of problems such as insufficient load capacity, health issues, increased demand for electricity and increased energy utilities expenditure. The issue of electricity deficit is a challenge which demands active participation of both the government and her citizens to address. This could be through prompt payment of bills, avoidance of vandalism of electrical installations, electric energy efficiency and conservation practices, on the part of the citizens; ensuring adequate power generation and distribution by exploiting all the available primary sources of electricity generation in the country, adopting healthy maintenance culture and doing away with old dilapidated installations on the part of the government.
REFERENCES
[1.] Olokooba S. M.; Ibrahim I. and Abdulraheem-Mustapha Μ. A.: Noise pollution: A catalyst to climate change and human health catastrophe. Nigerian Journal of Food, Health and Drug Law, Kogi State University, Anyigba, Vol. 3, Iss.l, 23-38, 2010.
[2.] Abayomi, W.: Nigeria's power supply security, 2012. http://www.myndff.com/PolicyDialogue/ Dialogue.aspx?Edition=56.
[3.] Azodo A. P. and Adejuyigbe S. B.: Examination of noise pollution from generators on the residents of Obantoko, Ogun State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Engineering, Sciences and Technology, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 31-41, 2013.
[4.] Bhagavan, M. R.: Reforming the power sector in Africa. African Energy Policy Research Network, 1999.
[5.] Isola, W. A.: Development in the Nigeria electricity sector. In: Nigeria's development in time perspective: Past, Present and future. Ibadan: NES, 2007.
[6.] Louw, D.; Craigwell, R. and Moore, W.: Price reform and household demand for electricity. Eurojournal, Vol. 4,181 - 203, 2008.
[7.] Makoju, Q: Policy options for the attainment of sustainable electricity supply in Nigeria. Bullion, Vol. 264, 21 - 25, 2002.
[8.] Narayan, P. K. and Smyth, R.: The residential demand for electricity in Australia: An application of the bounds testing approach to cointegration. Energy Policy, Vol. 33, 467 - 474, 2005.
[9.] Narayan, P. K.; Smyth, R. and Prasad, A.: Electricity consumption in G7 countries: A panel cointegration analysis of residential demand elasticities. Energy Policy, Vol. 35,4485 - 4494, 2007.
[10.] Tariq, M.; Salman, M.; Nasir, and AnkashaArif,: Residential Demand for Electricity in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, Vol. 4,457-467, 2009,
[11.] Ekpo, U.N.: Public investment and infrastructural development: The case of electric power supply in Nigeria 1970-2004.Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria, 2010.
[12.] Ali-Akpajiak, S.C.A. and Pyke, T.: Measuringpoverty in Nigeria. Oxfam Working Paper, OxfamGB, 274, Oxford, 2003.
[13.] Oseni, J.E. and George, E.O.: The relationship between electricity power and unemployment rates in Nigeria. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, Vol. 22,10-19,2012.
[14.] Central Bank of Nigeria. Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin. CBN Press, Abuja, 2009.
[15.] Ekpo U.O.; Chuku A.C. and Effiong E. L.: The dynamics of electricity demand and consumption in Nigeria: Application of the bounds testing approach current. Research Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 32,43-52, 2011.
[16.] Herath, J.; Gebremedhin, T. and Fletcher, J.: An analysis of residential demand for electricity in south region of the United States. Conference Proceedings, 2011 MCRSA Mid-Continent Regional Science Conference Proceedings, 11-21. 2011. http://www.mcrsa.org/Assets/Documents/ Proceedings/
[17.] Pelesai, A.N. and ThankGod, A.O.: The dynamics of demand and supply of electricity in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, Vol. 33, 2013.
[18.] Adegbulugbe, A.O. and Akinbami, J-F.K.: Urban household energy use patterns in Nigeria. Natural Resource Forum, Vol. 192.125-133,1995.
[19.] Arimah, B. C.: Electricity consumption in Nigeria: A Spatial Analysis. OPEC Review, winter. Vol. 17, 68 - 72,1992.
[20.] Kicking, R.: Electricity consumption in New South Wales. An Application of cointegration techniques to energy modelling and forecasting, 2006.
[21.] Holtedahl, P. and Joutz, F.: Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. Energy Economics, Vol. 26, 201-224, 2004.
[22.] Holtedahl, P; and Jontz, F.L.: Residential electricity demand in Taiwan. Department of Economics, The George Washington University Journal, 3-5, 2000.
[23.] Lin, B.Q.: Electricity demand in the people's republic of china: investment requirement and environmental impact. Economics and Research Department Working Paper Series Number No.37, Asian Development Bank, 2003.
[24.] Zhenmin, F.: Rural household energy consumption with the economic development in China: Stages and characteristics indices. Energy Policy Vol. 2915, 1391-1397, 2001.
[25.] Halvorsen, B. and Larsen, B, Changes in the pattern of household electricity demand over time. Discussion Papers 255, Statistics, Norway, 1999.
[26.] Ubani, O.J.; Umeh, L. And Ugwu, L.N.: Analysis of the electricity consumption in the south - eastgeopolitical region of Nigeria. Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy, 31, 2013.
[27.] Yoo, S.; Lee, J. and Kwak, S.: Estimation of residential electricity demand function in Seoul by correction for sample selection bias. Energy Policy, Vol. 35. 5702 - 5707, 2007.
[28.] Joskow, P.: Retail electricity consumption. The RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 374. 180 - 198, 2008.
[29.] Hondroyannis, G.; Swamy, P.A.; Tavlas, G.S. and Hall, S.G.: Estimation of parameters in the presence of model misspedfication and measurement error. Studies in non -linear dynamics and Econometrics. Vol. 143.1. 20, 2010.
[30.] Suie, B. F.; Ajao, K. R. and Ajimotokan, H. A.: A survey of use of electric lamps and energy consumption in residential buildings in selected estates in florin, Nigeria. Energy Engineering, Vol. 1082. 57-68, 2011.
[31.] Reiss, P.C. and White M.W.: Household electridty demand, revisited. Stanford University Publication, 2002. http://www.stanford.edu/~preiss/demand.pdf
[32.] EPSERP. Nigeria Economic and Power Sector Reform Program.2009 Appraisal Report. Available at http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Project-and-Operations/Nigeria%20%20 The%20Economic%20and%20Power%20Sector%20Reform%20Program%20%28EPSERP%29.pdf
[33.] RCEER. Resource Center for Energy Economics and Regulation.: Guide to Electric Power in Ghana First Edition. Institute of Statistical, Sodal and Economic Research. University of Ghana. 1 -57, 2005.
[34.] Odularu, G.O. and Okonkwo, C.: Does energy consumption contribute to economic performance? Empirical evidence from. Nigeria Journal of Economics and International Finance, Vol. 12, 44-58, 2009.
[35.] Moyo, B.: Do power cuts affect productivity? A case study of Nigerian manufacturing firms.Intemational Business and Economics Research Journal, Vol. 1110,1163-1174,2012.
[36.] Babatunde, M.A. and Shuaibu, M..L: The demand for residential electridty in Nigeria. A bound testing approach. A paper presented at the 2009 Conference of the African Econometric Sodety, 2009.
[37.] Ubi, P.S,; Effiom L,; Okon E.O. and Oduneka A.E.: An econometric analysis of the determinants of electridty supply in Nigeria. International Journal of Business Administration, 34, 2012.
[38.] Kazeem Q: Power sector privatization and the challenge of powering Nigeria Monday, 2013. Retrieved from http://www.workersalternative.com/national-issues/177-ka
[39.] Oketola D. 2014. Power outage drains consumers' purse http://www.punchng.com/feature/power- outage-drains-consumers-purse/
[40.] Index Mimdi.: Nigeria - Electric power transmission and distribution losses, 2013. Retrieved horn http://www.mdexmundi.com/facts/nigeria/electric-power-transmission-and-distribution-losses
[41.] Uzoma, C.C.; Nnaji, C.E. and Nnaji, M.: The role of energy mix in sustainable development of Nigeria.Continental Journal Sodal Sdences, Vol. 51,21-29,2012.
[42.] ECN, Energy Commission of Nigeria.: Renewable energy master plan. Abuja, 2005.
[43.] Popoola, J.J.; Ponnle, A.A. and Ale, T.O.: Reliability worth assessment of electric power utility in Nigeria: residential customer survey results.Assumptin University Journal of Technology, 1 Vol. Iss. 43, 217-224, 2011.
[44.] Tokede, W. and Okonji, C: Nigeria, Second worst in electridty - World Bank Report. Retrieve horn http://www.mydailynewswatchng.com/nigeria-second-worst-inelectridtysupply/June 5, 2013
[45.] Gnansounou, E.: Boosting the electridty sector in West Africa: An integrative vision. International Assodation for Energy Economics, 37- 42, 2008.
[46.] Oketola D.: Power generation drops by 1,074MW 2013. Retrieved from http://www.punchng.com /news/power-generation-drops-by-1074mw/
[47.] Asaolu, T. O. and Oladele, P.O.: Public enterprises and privatisation policy: The Nigerianexperience in Nigerian economy: Essays on economic development ed. Feridun and Akindele, Munich personal RePEc archive, MPRA, 293 - 394, 2006.
[48.] World Bank. Making services work for the poor people. World Development Report 2004. Washington DC: The World Bank and Oxford University Press
[49.] Suie, A.H.: Major factors affecting electridty generation, transmission and distribution in nigeria.International Journal of Engineering and Mathematical Intelligence, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 159 -164, 2010.
[50.] Adenikinju, A.F.: Electric infrastructure failures in Nigeria: A survey-based analysis of the costs and adjustment responses" Energy Policy, Vol. 31,1519-1530, 2003.
[51.] ECN. Energy Commission of Nigeria, National Energy Policy. Abuja. August, 2002.
[52.] Ibitoye, F. and Adenikinju. A.: Future demand for electridty in Nigeria. Applied Energy, Vol. 84, 492-504, 2007.
[53.] Iwayemi, A.: Investment in electridty generation and transmission in Nigeria: Issues and Options.International Assodation for Energy Economics, 37 - 42, 2008.
[54.] Anaekwe, E. N.: Investment opportunity in Nigeria. 2010. Retrieved from www.farriconsultingng.blogspot.com
[55.] Sambo, A.S.: Renewable energy for rural development: the Nigerian perspective. In: ISESCO Sdence and Technology Vision, Vol. 1,12-22, 2005.
[56.] Ayodele, A.S.: Improving and sustaining power electridty supper for sodo-economic development in Nigeria tenth. Abuja: Annual Conference, 1999.
[57.] Sanyaolu, H.A.: Electridty power sector reform in Nigeria: Utilising restructuring and regulatory reform as a means of achieving a more effident and competitive sedor. Thesis CEPMLP, 2008.
[58.] Okoro, O.I. and Chikuni, E.: Power sector reforms in Nigeria: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, Vol. 183, 52-57, 2007.
[59.] Simolowo, O.E. and Oladele, S.: Energy-Cost Analysis of Alternative Sources to Electridty in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Sdence and Technology, Vol. 51,1946-1952, 2012.
[60.] Iwayemi, A.: Nigeria's dual energy problems: Policy Issues and challenges. International Assodation for Energy Economics, Vol. 53,17-21, 2008.
[61.] Walsh, D.; and Masood S.: Pakistan Faces Struggle to Keep Its Lights, 2013. Retrieved horn http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/28/world/asia/pakistan-electridty-shortages-reach-crisis- stage.html?r=0
[62.] Shunkun, Y.; Lisha, Z. and Chen, L.: China Wrestles with Power Shortages, North China Electric Power University, 2013. Retrieved horn http://www.powermag.com/china-wrestles-with-power- shortages/05/01/2013
[63.] Dincer, I. and Dost, S.: Energy and GDP. International Journal Energy Resources, Vol. 21, 153-167, 1997.
[64.] Ziramba, E., 2008.The demand for residential electridty in South Africa. Energy Policy, 36: 3460- 3466.
[65.] Al-Faris, A.R.: The demand for electridty in the GCC countries. Energy Policy, Vol. 30, 117-124, 2002.
[66.] Lin, B.Q.: Electricity demand in the people's Republic of China: Investment requirement and environmental impact. Economics and Research Department Working Paper Series Number No.37.Asian Development Bank, 2003.
[67.] Sa'ad, S.: Electricity demand for South Korean residential sector. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, 5469-5474, 2009.
[68.] Nasr, G.E.; Badr, E.A. and Dibeh, G.: Econometric modelling of electricity consumption in post-war Lebanon. Energy Economics, Vol. 22, 627-640, 2000.
[69.] Beenstock, M.; Goldin, E. and Nabot, D.: The Demand for Electricity in Israel. Energy Economics, Vol. 21, 168-183,1999.
[70.] Donatos, G.S. and Mergos, G.J.: Residential demand for electricity: The case of Greece. Energy Economics, 41-47,1991.
[71.] Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W.J.: Cointegration and error correction representation: Estimation and testing. Econometrica, Vol. 55, 251-276,1987.
[72.] Johansen, S.: Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. Journal Economics Dynamics Control, Vol. 12, 231-254,1988.
[73.] Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics Statistics, Vol. 52, 169-210, 1990.
[74.] Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y. and Smith, R.J.: Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 163, 289-326, 2001.
[75.] Choong, C.K.; Zulkornian, Y. and VenusLiew K.S.: Export-led growth hypothesis in Malaysia: An investigation using bounds tests. Sunway Academic Journal, Vol. 2,13-22, 2005.
[76.] Halidoglu, F.: Residential electricity demand dynamics in Turkey. Energy, Vol. 29,199, 2007.
[77.] Gladhart, P.; Morrison B. and Zuiches, J. Energy and families. East Lansing, Michigan Institute for Family and Child Study. Michigan State University Press, 1986.
[78.] Schipper, L.; Barrlett, S.; Hawk, D. and Vine, E. Linking life styles and energy use a matter of time?. Annual Review of Energy, Vol. 14, 273-320,1989.
[79.] De Vita, G.; Endresen, K.; and Hunt, L.C.: An empirical analysis of energy demand in Namibia. Energy Policy, Vol. 34, 3447-3463, 2006.
[80.] Zachariadis, T.; and Pashourtidou, N.: An Empirical analysis of electricity consumption in Cyprus. Energy Economics, Vol. 29,183-198, 2007.
[81.] Galindo, L.M.: Short- and long-run demand for energy in Mexico: A cointegration approach. Energy Policy, Vol. 33,1179-1185, 2007.
[82.] Filippini, M.; and Pachauri, S.: Elasticities of electricity demand in Urban Indian households. Energy Policy, Vol. 32,429-436, 2004.
[83.] Hunt, L.C.; Judge, G.; and Ninomiya, Y.: Underlying trends and seasonality in UK energy demand: A sectoral analysis. Energy Economics, Vol. 25, 93-118, 2003.
[84.] Taiwo,A.M.; Adeogim, A.O.; Olatunde, K.A. and Adegbite, K.I.: Analysis of groundwater quality of hand-dug wells in peri-urban area of Obantoko, Abeokuta, Nigeria for selected physico-chemical parameters.Padfic Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 121,527- 534, 2011.
[85.] Ufoegbune, G. C.; Orimoloye, A. O.; Enrola, A. O. and Ogimyemi, I. O.: The economics of water supply management in Obantoko area, Abeokuta. Nigeria Journal of Geology and Mining Research. Vol. 36,153-160, 2011.
[86.] Gbadebo, A.M.; Oyedepo, J.A. and Taiwo, A.M.: Variability of Nitrate in Groundwater in Some Parts of Southwestern Nigeria. The Pacific Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 112, 572-584, 2010.
[87.] Okoye, J.K.: Background study on water and energy issues in Nigeria to inform the national consultative conference on dams and development, 2007.
[88.] Elendu, I.C.: Sports tourism as an instrument for Nigeria's development in the 21st century: Challenges and way forward. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol. 44,143 -148, 2013.
[89.] Kennedy-Darling, J.; Hoyt, N.; Murao, K. and Ross, A.: The energy crisis of Nigeria: An overview and implications for the future. The University of Chicago, 2008. Retrieved from http://franke.uchicago.edu/bigproblems/Energy/BP-Energy-Nigeria.pdf
[90.] Idiata, D.J.;Omoruyi, S.O. and Aiwize. E.A.: Sustainable power: Impact of generator driven economy on the environment. Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Science, Vol. 11, 55-61, 2010.
[91.] Tyler, G.: Public and private electricity provision as a barrier to manufacturing competitiveness Africa Region: Findings. World Bank, 2002. Retrieved from < http://www.worldbank.org/afr/findings/english/find221.pdf>
[92.] IEA, Energy Information Administration.2006. International Energy Annual 2006. Retrieved from http://www.eia.doe.gov
[93.] IEA-ECBCS, International Energy Agency - Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems.: Guidebook on energy efficient electric lighting for buildings. Annex 45 - Energy Efficient Electric Lighting for Buildings, 2010.
[94.] ECN-UNDP. Energy Commission of Nigeria and United Nations Development Programme.: Renewable energy master plan: final draft report, 2005. Retrieved from http://www.iceednigeria.org/REMP%20Final%20Report.pdf
[95.] Bridger, R.S.: Introduction to Ergonomics. London: Taylor and Francis, 2008.
[96.] Suthar, N. and Kaushik, V.: Musculoskeletal problems among agricultural female workers. Stud Home Com Sd, Vol. 73.145-149, 2013.
[97.] Weiner, D.L.: Impingement syndrome: A question of mechanics. Rehab Management, 87- 92,1992.
[98.] Cometonigeria.com: Ogun State - "Gateway State", 2011. Retrieved from http://www. cometonigeria.com/search-by-region/south-west/ogun-state/
[99.] Stoecker, W.F.: Industrial Refrigeration Handbook. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. New York, 1998.
[100.] Afon, A. O. and Okewole, A.: Estimating the quantity of solid waste generation in Oyo, Nigeria. Waste Management and Research, Vol. 254,371-379,2007.
[101.] Afon, A. O. 2007. An analysis of solid waste generation in a traditional African dty: the example of Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Environment and Urbanization, Vol. 19 Iss. 2,527-537,
[102.] Ogbonna, D.N.; Amangabara, G.T. and Ekere, T.O.: Urban solid waste generation in Port Harcourt metropolis and its implications for waste management. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 181, 2007.
P.A. AZODO
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, NIGERIA
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara 2014
Abstract
Limited access to quality and quantity electricity has remained an unresolved scourge in Nigeria. The ravage cuts across all electric energy utilization sectors in the nation most especially in the residential sector. This study highlights the sources of electric power supply, utilization features and effects of electricity deficits in Obantoko residents. A total of 124 households interviewed were selected using systematic random sampling techniques. This comprises of room(s), flat and duplex apartment inhabitants. The findings showed that despite the national grid connection, a significant number of households own and operate generators due to electricity shortfalls in the area. This essentially hamper domestic activities in various homes. The effects on several households includes interruption of work, home discomfort, consequential effect on performance, increase expenditure, undue wastage, stress due to manual/mechanical household works and enjoyment/pleasure disruption. The salvaging role of private generators as an alternative source of power supply does not seem to significantly address the problem of electric power insufficiency in Nigeria as it poses its own challenges. There is therefore the need for improvement of the public source of power supply and adoption of other private alternative sources of electricity supply that have reduced operating cost and health implication
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer





