It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Coexistence of ecologically similar species can be maintained by partitioning along one or more niche axes. Three-dimensional structural complexity is central to facilitating resource partitioning between many forest species, but is underrepresented in field-based studies. We examined resource selection by sympatric northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina), a threatened species under the US Endangered Species Act, and nonnative barred owls (S. varia) in western Oregon, USA to explore the relative importance of canopy heterogeneity, vertical complexity of forest, and abiotic features to resource selection and identify potential differences that may facilitate long-term coexistence. We predicted that within home range selection of understory densities, measured with airborne lidar, would differ between species based on proportional differences in arboreal and terrestrial prey taken by each owl species. We used discrete choice models and telemetry data from 41 spotted owls and 38 barred owls monitored during 2007–2009 and 2012–2015. Our results suggested that while both species used tall canopy areas more often than low canopy areas, spotted owls were more commonly found in areas with lower tree cover, more developed understory, and steeper slopes. This is the first evidence of fine-scale partitioning based on structural forest properties by northern spotted owls and barred owls.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis Forestry Sciences Lab, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.497403.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9388 540X)
2 USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis Forestry Sciences Lab, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.497403.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9388 540X); Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969)
3 US Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.2865.9) (ISNI:0000000121546924)
4 University of Washington, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000000122986657)
5 National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Anacortes, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33)