It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The successful irruption of AI-based technology in our daily lives has led to a growing educational, social, and political interest in training citizens in AI. Education systems now need to train students at the K-12 level to live in a society where they must interact with AI. Thus, AI literacy is a pedagogical and cognitive challenge at the K-12 level. This study aimed to understand how AI is being integrated into K-12 education worldwide. We conducted a search process following the systematic literature review method using Scopus. 179 documents were reviewed, and two broad groups of AI literacy approaches were identified, namely learning experience and theoretical perspective. The first group covered experiences in learning technical, conceptual and applied skills in a particular domain of interest. The second group revealed that significant efforts are being made to design models that frame AI literacy proposals. There were hardly any experiences that assessed whether students understood AI concepts after the learning experience. Little attention has been paid to the undesirable consequences of an indiscriminate and insufficiently thought-out application of AI. A competency framework is required to guide the didactic proposals designed by educational institutions and define a curriculum reflecting the sequence and academic continuity, which should be modular, personalized and adjusted to the conditions of the schools. Finally, AI literacy can be leveraged to enhance the learning of disciplinary core subjects by integrating AI into the teaching process of those subjects, provided the curriculum is co-designed with teachers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of Santiago de Compostela, Pedagogy and Didactics Department, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645)
2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645); Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes (CiTIUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645)
3 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Electrónica e Computación, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645)
4 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Intelixentes (CiTIUS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain (GRID:grid.11794.3a) (ISNI:0000000109410645)