It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The XBB.1.5 variant of SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly achieved global dominance and exhibits a high growth advantage over previous variants. Preliminary reports suggest that the success of XBB.1.5 stems from mutations within its spike glycoprotein, causing immune evasion and enhanced receptor binding. We present receptor binding studies that demonstrate retention of binding contacts with the human ACE2 receptor and a striking decrease in binding to mouse ACE2 due to the revertant R493Q mutation. Despite extensive evasion of antibody binding, we highlight a region on the XBB.1.5 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) that is recognized by serum antibodies from a donor with hybrid immunity, collected prior to the emergence of the XBB.1.5 variant. T cell assays reveal high frequencies of XBB.1.5 spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells amongst donors with hybrid immunity, with the CD4+ T cells skewed towards a Th1 cell phenotype and having attenuated effector cytokine secretion as compared to ancestral spike protein-specific cells. Thus, while the XBB.1.5 variant has retained efficient human receptor binding and gained antigenic alterations, it remains susceptible to recognition by T cells induced via vaccination and previous infection.
New variants of SARS-CoV-2 virus can evolve such that antibodies that recognised previous versions are not able to recognise newer versions. Here the authors characterise antibody binding to the XBB.1.5 variant and how antibodies and T cells from persons infected with earlier versions of SARS-CoV-2 are able to recognise and/or bind to the XBB.1.5 spike protein.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of British Columbia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830)
2 University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine and BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830)
3 University of British Columbia, Department of Medicine and BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830); University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X); University of Melbourne, Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, Parkville, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
4 University of British Columbia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Vancouver, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2288 9830); Gandeeva Therapeutics, Inc., Burnaby, Canada (GRID:grid.17091.3e)