It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recent seismic tomography unveiled complex mantle plume structures diverging from the originally proposed single, narrow, and vertically-oriented plume conduits, which necessitates new perspectives on the mechanism of hotspot motion. While several recent endeavours have focused on Pacific hotspots’ motion, knowledge of others remains limited. Here we constrain the motions of the Kerguelen hotspot within the Indian Ocean by obtaining robust 40Ar/39Ar ages for the Ninetyeast Ridge, Earth’s longest linear volcanic ridge. These data indicate varying volcanic progression rates along the ridge, contrasting to a constant rate as previously documented. Combined with constraints on the Indian Plate motion and seafloor spreading, we reveal four periods of motions of the hotspot caused by its interactions with the Indian–Antarctic spreading ridge. This suggests that mantle plume lateral flows are susceptible to changes in shallow mantle convection due to the existence of horizontal ponding zones and vertical conduits, especially in the shallow asthenosphere.
The Ninetyeast Ridge is the world’s longest linear volcanic feature. 40Ar/39Ar ages show that the > 5000 km-long ridge was generated by a moving hotspot and reveal the hotspot’s interaction with a spreading ridge during the opening of the Indian Ocean.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 China University of Petroleum, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411519.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5174); China University of Petroleum, College of Geosciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411519.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5174); Curtin University, Western Australian Argon Isotope Facility, John de Laeter Centre, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1032.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0375 4078)
2 Curtin University, Timescales of Mineral Systems Group, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1032.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0375 4078)
3 Curtin University, Western Australian Argon Isotope Facility, John de Laeter Centre, School of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1032.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0375 4078)
4 Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development, Uppsala, Sweden (GRID:grid.8993.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9457)
5 The University of Queensland, School of the Environment, St. Lucia, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
6 University of Houston, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Houston, USA (GRID:grid.266436.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1569 9707)