Content area

Abstract

A major reduction in global deforestation is needed to mitigate climate change and biodiversity loss. Recent private sector commitments aim to eliminate deforestation from a company’s operations or supply chain, but they fall short on several fronts. Company pledges vary in the degree to which they include time-bound interventions with clear definitions and criteria to achieve verifiable outcomes. Zero-deforestation policies by companies may be insufficient to achieve broader impact on their own due to leakage, lack of transparency and traceability, selective adoption and smallholder marginalization. Public–private policy mixes are needed to increase the effectiveness of supply-chain initiatives that aim to reduce deforestation. We review current supply-chain initiatives, their effectiveness, and the challenges they face, and go on to identify knowledge gaps for complementary public–private policies.

Details

Title
The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation
Author
Lambin, Eric F 1 ; Gibbs, Holly K 2 ; Heilmayr, Robert 3 ; Carlson, Kimberly M 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Fleck, Leonardo C 5 ; Garrett, Rachael D 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Yann le Polain de Waroux 7 ; McDermott, Constance L 8 ; McLaughlin, David 9 ; Newton, Peter 10   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Nolte, Christoph 6 ; Pacheco, Pablo 11   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Rausch, Lisa L 12   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Streck, Charlotte 13 ; Thorlakson, Tannis 14 ; Walker, Nathalie F 15 

 School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Georges Lemaître Earth and Climate Research Centre, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 
 Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE), Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 
 Environmental Studies Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA 
 Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI, USA 
 Environmental Conservation Program, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA 
 Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA 
 Institute for the Study of International Development & Department of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
 Environmental Change Institute, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 
 World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC, USA 
10  Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA 
11  Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor Barat, Indonesia 
12  Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE), Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 
13  Climate Focus, Washington, DC, USA 
14  Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 
15  National Wildlife Federation, National Advocacy Center, Washington, DC, USA 
Pages
109-116
Publication year
2018
Publication date
Feb 2018
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
ISSN
1758678X
e-ISSN
17586798
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
1992989664
Copyright
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 2018