It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The larger frame of this study contributes to the literature that examines how educators negotiate, contest, appropriate, and reconstruct federal and state-level policy in their classrooms. More specifically, the study contributes to the field of language education policy, and in particular to how educators make sense of, and implement, English Language Development (ELD) Standards. I focus on WIDA ELD Standards, as they are currently in use in 42 U.S. states, territories, and federal agencies as well as more than 500 international schools throughout the world. The literature review identifies a problem for standards-based education systems using the 2012 WIDA Standards Framework: various reports show that they are not sufficiently user-friendly in their design to be meaningfully operationalized by educators designing curriculum in practice, leaving many to either ignore them altogether or to ask for additional help from standards-setting organizations and state departments of education, and requiring a locally-created “extra layer” to be used. This study focuses on how one such locally-created “extra-layer,” the Next Generation English-as-a-Second-Language Project and its Collaboration Tool, might facilitate processes to promote the simultaneous development of language and content, a central aspect of the WIDA ELD standards. I approach this study through a critical democratic theoretical framework coupled with a conceptual framework that sees policy as a social practice of power. Together, these frameworks open up spaces to consider how educators maneuver power to creatively and intentionally engage with policy in their classrooms.
Findings indicate that educators would feel better supported in operationalizing WIDA ELD standards if they further specified language functions, features, forms, and genres from the context of disciplinary learning, and if they were presented in a more streamlined, actionable, and user-friendly way. Ultimately, the study underscores the importance of developing greater authentic dialogue and genuine democratic practices in policymaking, and underscores the importance of reflective spaces that support educators in unpacking sociocultural, sociohistorical, and sociopolitical aspects of education and the world surrounding it.
Implications of this study can inform policy processes, educator preparation programs, professional development offerings, and the design of future language development standards and related tools.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer