About the Authors:
Jennifer L. Lockridge
Contributed equally to this work with: Jennifer L. Lockridge, Xiuxu Chen
Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Xiuxu Chen
Contributed equally to this work with: Jennifer L. Lockridge, Xiuxu Chen
Current address: Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America
Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Ying Zhou
Affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Deepika Rajesh
Current address: Cellular Dynamics International, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Drew A. Roenneburg
Affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Subramanya Hegde
Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Sarah Gerdts
Current address: Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Tan-Yun Cheng
Affiliation: Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
Regan J. Anderson
Affiliation: Carbohydrate Chemistry Team, Industrial Research Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
Gavin F. Painter
Affiliation: Carbohydrate Chemistry Team, Industrial Research Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
D. Branch Moody
Affiliation: Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
William J. Burlingham
Affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Jenny E. Gumperz
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
Introduction
CD1 molecules are a family of β2-microglobulin-associated transmembrane glycoproteins that have a structure resembling class I molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) [1]. There are five different CD1 isoforms, called CD1a, b, c, d and e, each of which is encoded by a distinct gene [2]. Of these, CD1a-d have been shown to present antigens at the cell surface for recognition by T cells, while CD1e is expressed intracellularly and contributes to antigen loading and processing [3]. In contrast to MHC-encoded antigen presenting molecules, CD1 molecules are specialized for binding lipid-containing antigens. Antigen binding to CD1 molecules is thought to occur mainly in intracellular compartments, and since CD1a and CD1b clearly follow different intracellular trafficking routes than CD1c and CD1d, it is thought that different CD1 isoforms may access distinct types of antigens. Additionally, CD1 isoforms are differentially expressed on antigen presenting cell (APC) types, with CD1d expressed broadly by myeloid APCs and B cells, and CD1a, CD1b, and CD1c showing more restricted patterns of expression [1]. As a result of these differences, different CD1 isoforms may carry out divergent antigen presenting functions.
T cells that are restricted by CD1a, CD1b, or CD1c have been implicated in human immune responses to mycobacterial infections (M. tuberculosis and M. leprae) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], and have been shown to recognize specific mycobacterial antigens including the lipid mycolic acid [9], glycolipids such as lipoarabinomannan, glucose monomycolate, and mannosyl-β-1-phosphomycoketides [10], [11], [12], [13], as well as lipopeptides such as the didehydroxymycobactins [14]. CD1-restricted T cells that recognized phosphatidylethanolamine derived from pollen appeared to be present in increased frequencies in allergic individuals [15], suggesting that the CD1 system may also contribute to allergic responses. Additionally, the CD1 system may play a role in human autoimmune diseases, since CD1b-restricted T cells recognizing self glycolipids such as gangliosides and sulfatide were isolated from multiple sclerosis patients [16], and autoreactive CD1c-restricted T cells from lupus patients were found to promote IgG secretion by B cells [17]. Thus, these data suggest that CD1a-, CD1b-, and CD1c-restricted T cells are involved in a variety of human diseases. However, progress in understanding the role of these T cells in immune responses in vivo has been limited by the lack of a good animal model.
CD1 genes have been detected in all mammalian species analyzed to date, and orthologues have even been identified in birds [18], [19]. However, not all of the CD1 isoforms are expressed in all species, and in some cases CD1 genes have been duplicated, resulting in several variants of the same isoform. Thus, while humans possess one of each of the five CD1 isoforms, this is not the rule. For example, mice and rats have lost the CD1A, B, C, and E genes and have duplicated the CD1D gene, while guinea pigs express multiple variants of CD1B and C, and rabbits and sheep have lost CD1C [18]. Because of these species differences, small animal models that mimic the pattern of CD1 expression found in humans have been lacking, and most in vivo analyses have focused on CD1d, which is the isoform that is present in mice.
The CD1d isoform is responsible for selecting a specialized T lymphocyte population called invariant Natural Killer T (iNKT) cells [1]. Murine and human iNKT cells utilize homologous TCRs, show a striking ability to recognize the same microbial glycolipid antigens, and have similar functional properties, including the ability to rapidly produce both Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Analyses of the in vivo functions of NKT cells using murine model systems have demonstrated that this subset has a potent ability to modulate immune function, and can markedly impact the outcome of anti-microbial, anti-viral, and anti-tumor responses, as well as ameliorating or preventing the progression of autoimmune diseases. These observations have generated considerable enthusiasm for the possibility that glycolipid antigens that stimulate iNKT cells could be used as therapeutic agents to treat human diseases [20], [21].
However, there are also important differences between humans and mice in regards to the iNKT cell compartment. One of the major differences is that human iNKT cells appear to be present at approximately 100-fold lower frequencies than murine iNKT cells [22], [23], and therefore it is not clear that human iNKT cells will have as potent immunological impacts as those observed in laboratory mice. Another important factor is that murine and human CD1d molecules show differences in intracellular trafficking, which may result in antigen presentation differences [3]. This may be reflected in the differences between murine and human iNKT cells in their requirements for activation by endogenous antigens. Whereas the activation of murine iNKT cells by endogenous ligands requires CD1d molecules to traffic through the endosomal system [24], [25], we have found that human iNKT cells appear to be equivalently activated by wild-type CD1d molecules that undergo endosomal trafficking and mutant CD1d molecules that do not [26]. Moreover, current data suggest that humans lack a glycolipid called isoglobotrihexosylceramide (iGb3) that is thought to endogenously activate murine NKT cells [27], [28]. On the other hand, many human NKT cells recognize an endogenous mammalian lipid called lyso-phosphatidylcholine (LPC) [29], but it is not yet clear whether murine iNKT cells recognize this antigen. Thus, although mice clearly provide an extremely valuable in vivo model of iNKT cell function, the successful development of glycolipids as therapeutic agents that activate iNKT cells to modulate human immune responses in specific ways may require a system that permits in vivo analysis of the human CD1d pathway.
Results
Human hematopoietic cell engraftment
To generate ‘humanized’ mice we followed an approach that has been described previously [30], in which 6–8 week old NOD/Prkdcscid/γcnull (NSG) mice are sub-lethally irradiated, then fragments of autologous human fetal liver and fetal thymus are implanted next to each other under the kidney capsule, and concurrently, CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells purified from the fetal liver are injected intravenously (Figure 1A). The human CD34+ cells colonize the murine bone marrow and undergo hematopoiesis, giving rise to a variety of human leukocyte populations that occupy peripheral lymphoid sites such as the spleen, liver, and lymph nodes. The fragments of human fetal thymic tissue, which are about 1 mm3 when they are implanted, expand in size and develop into a vascularized organoid that shows a lobular organization typical of thymus (Figure 1B). In contrast, the human fetal liver fragment becomes undetectable by 8–10 weeks post-engraftment.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 1. Immune reconstitution of engrafted mice.
A) Schematic representation of the protocol used to engraft mice with human cells and tissues. B) A photograph taken from the abdominal side shows an engrafted human thymic organoid growing on the lateral superior surface of a murine left kidney. Histological analysis of the thymic tissue shows a lobular organization with cortical and medullary areas. The medullary area shown at 20× magnification on the right includes several bodies that closely resemble the Hassall's corpuscles found in human thymus. C) Blood samples from engrafted mice were taken at the indicated times and analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of the total blood leukocytes expressing human CD45. D) Flow cytometric analysis of cells isolated from spleen (top panels) and liver (bottom panels) of engrafted mice. The samples were first gated on the human CD45+ subset, and then gated by forward and side scatter to focus on lymphocytic cells (left panels) or myeloid cells (right panels).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g001
We have found that the frequency of human hematopoietic cells (i.e. human CD45+) in the blood of the mice increases steadily for about the first 10–12 weeks after engraftment, and thereafter the levels remain comparatively constant [31]. Although there is mouse-to-mouse variation in the degree of human chimerism, blood samples from our humanized mice typically contained 20–70% (mean 53%) human CD45+ cells by 12–14 weeks post-engraftment (Figure 1C). Analysis of human cells isolated from spleen or livers of mice 12 or more weeks post-engraftment consistently demonstrated the presence of T cells (CD3+), B cells (CD19+), macrophages or monocytic cells (CD14+), and CD11c+ cells that were negative for CD14 (Figure 1D). Thus, we were able to obtain successful reconstitution of multiple lineages of human hematopoietic cells within NSG mice.
Analysis of the human thymic organoid
Murine CD1d-restricted NKT cells have been found to be positively selected by CD1d molecules that are expressed on other thymocytes (i.e. developing T cells), and to be negatively selected by thymic dendritic cells [32], [33]. Therefore, we examined the thymic organoids of engrafted (“hu-NSG”) mice for evidence that the development of human CD1-restricted T cells might be supported. Histological analysis of thymic organoid sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin showed densely packed cortical zones surrounding somewhat less densely packed medullary areas (Figure 1B). Towards the center of the medullary areas, eosinophilic concentric circle-like structures were visible that closely resemble the Hassall's corpuscles found in human thymus (Figure 1B). Flow cytometric analysis of cells isolated from the human thymic organoid revealed clear expression of human CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, and CD1d on most CD3+ cells (Figure 2A). The CD1+ T cells were mainly double positive for the co-receptors CD4 and CD8 (Figure 2A), as is characteristic of cortical thymocytes. Immunohistochemical analysis of the thymic organoid for human CD1a expression revealed positive staining on small round lymphocytic cells packing the outer cortical areas, while most of the small round lymphocytic cells in the inner medullary areas appeared negative for CD1a (Figure 2B). However, there were some larger cells present in the medullary areas that showed intense staining for CD1a, and these tended to be localized near the edges of the Hassall's corpuscles (Figure 2B). These results suggest that that there are two distinct types of CD1+ cells within the engrafted human thymic organoid: developing thymocytes localizing mainly to the cortical areas, and larger cells in the medullary areas that may be dendritic cells (DCs). Based on this analysis, we would expect that human CD1-restricted T cells can be both positively and negatively selected in the engrafted thymic organoid.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 2. Expression of human CD1 molecules in the engrafted thymic organoid.
A) Flow cytometric analysis of human CD3+ cells from the thymic organoid. Top row: staining with antibodies specific for the indicated CD1 molecules is shown by the filled histograms, open histograms show staining by isotype-matched negative control antibodies. Bottom row: contour plots showing CD4 and CD8 staining of the CD1-positive populations. B) Immunohistological analysis of the engrafted thymic organoid at 40× magnification, using an antibody against human CD1a, with DAB chromogenic development (brown color) and hematoxylin counterstaining of nuclei (blue color).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g002
Peripheral expression of human CD1 molecules
We next evaluated the expression of human CD1 molecules in peripheral tissues of engrafted mice. Human CD1a, CD1b, and CD1c molecules are most prominently expressed on myeloid DC lineages, although a fraction of B lymphocytes are typically positive for CD1c. Spleen cells from hu-NSG mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for co-expression of CD1 molecules and lineage markers characteristic of myeloid antigen presenting cells and B cells. Human cells within the myeloid gate that were positive for CD11c (a marker of DCs) showed only very little positive staining for CD1a or CD1b, but a substantial fraction were typically positive for CD1c (Figure 3A). CD1c expression was observed on both CD14+ (i.e. monocytes and macrophages) and CD14− myeloid cells (e.g. DCs). Additionally, a substantial fraction of the CD19+ lymphocytes typically stained positively for CD1c (Figure 3A). CD1c expression on B cells appeared limited to those that co-expressed CD20, a phenotype that is characteristic of mature B cells.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 3. Expression of human CD1 molecules in peripheral tissues.
A and B) Flow cytometric analysis of splenocytes for CD1a, CD1b,CD1c, and CD1d. The samples were first gated on the human CD45+ subset, and then gated by forward and side scatter to focus on myeloid or lymphoid cells. C) Histological analysis of CD1a expression in spleen, liver, and lung sections from engrafted mice (bottom row) or human tissue samples (top row). CD1a expression is visualized by DAB staining (brown colored cells). The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, producing blue staining of cell nuclei. All images are shown at 40× magnification.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g003
Human CD1d molecules are constitutively expressed at low cell surface levels by monocytes, macrophages, myeloid DCs, and B lymphocytes [34]. Consistent with this, human CD14+ cells in the engrafted mice appeared uniformly positive for CD1d, and a small fraction of the CD14− myeloid cells (possibly myeloid DCs) also expressed high levels of CD1d (Figure 3B). Moreover, B cells in the engrafted mice appeared nearly uniformly positive for CD1d, with very low cell surface expression levels (Figure 3B). These patterns of CD1a, b, c, and d expression closely resemble what we have observed in similar flow cytometric analyses of mononuclear cells freshly isolated from human blood (data not shown).
To further assess the presence of CD1+ APCs in peripheral tissues of engrafted mice, we performed immunohistochemical staining for CD1a on sections of spleen, liver, lung, and skin. Some of the hu-NSG spleen sections analyzed showed isolated cells that stained positively for CD1a, and similarly rare positive staining for CD1a was observed in adult human spleen sections (Figure 3C). Multiple cells staining positively for CD1a could be observed in liver sections from the hu-NSG mice and in sections of adult human liver, suggesting that CD1a+ APCs might be more abundant in this tissue (Figure 3C). We also observed CD1a+ cells in lung sections analyzed from the hu-NSG mice, although they appeared less abundant than those in adult human lung sections (Figure 3C). We were not able to identify CD1a+ cells in skin sections from the hu-NSG mice (data not shown), although CD1a+ Langerhans cells are typically prominently expressed in human skin. Together, these results indicate that CD1+ APCs are present at major sites of immunological activity of engrafted mice, including spleen, liver, and lung, although they may be largely lacking in the skin.
Presentation of glycolipid antigens
To investigate CD1-mediated antigen presentation by APCs from hu-NSG mice, we isolated cells from spleen or liver and tested their ability to stimulate antigen-dependent cytokine secretion by previously established and characterized human CD1-restricted T cell lines. To test for antigen presentation by CD1a, we used transfected JRT.3 cells expressing a TCR (CD8-2) that has been found to specifically recognize didehydroxymycobactin (DDM) presented by CD1a [14]. We observed marked human IFN-γ production when CD8-2 transfected JRT.3 cells were incubated with spleen cells from an engrafted mouse, however, the cytokine response was not increased by addition of the DDM antigen (Figure 4A, left panel). In contrast, liver mononuclear cells stimulated only modest IFN-γ production from the transfected JRT.3 cells in the absence of DDM, and addition of the antigen resulted in enhanced cytokine secretion (Figure 4A, right panel). Thus, APCs from the liver of hu-NSG mice appeared to be able to perform CD1a-mediated antigen presenting functions, but it was not clear whether splenic APCs shared this ability.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 4. Analysis of CD1-mediated antigen presentation.
Mononuclear cells from spleen or liver were used to stimulate cytokine secretion by human CD1-restricted T cell lines in the presence of specific cognate antigens. Black squares show cytokine secretion detected from incubation of human T cells with spleen or liver cells from engrafted mice in the presence of the glycolipid antigen concentrations indicated on the x-axis; grey squares show cytokine secretion detected from T cells incubated with APCs in the absence of glycolipid antigen; and white squares show the results from T cells incubated alone. The squares represent the mean cytokines values from 2–4 replicate analyses with error bars showing standard deviations. A) CD1a-mediated antigen presentation was tested using a cell line called CD8-2 and the antigen didehydroxymycobactin (DDM). B) CD1b-mediated antigen presentation was tested using a cell line called LDN5 and the antigen glucose monomycolate (GMM). C) CD1c-mediated antigen presentation was tested using a cell line called CD8-1 and the antigen mannosylphosphomycoketide (MPM). D) CD1d-mediated antigen presentation was tested using an iNKT cell line called J24L.17 and the antigen α-galacosylceramide (α-GalCer). Results are representative of 2–3 independent experiments.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g004
A CD1b-restricted human T cell line called LDN5, which specifically recognizes the mycobacterial lipid glucose monomycolate (GMM) [11], was used to evaluate CD1b-mediated antigen presenting function. Co-incubation of LDN5 cells with splenocytes or liver cells from hu-NSG mice resulted in some IFN-γ production in the absence of added antigen, but there were clear dose-dependent increases in IFN-γ secretion in response to GMM (Figure 4B). Notably, the form of GMM used for these studies contains a long (80 carbon) acyl chain, and has been shown to require internalization into endocytic compartments for loading into CD1b molecules before it can be presented at the cell surface [35]. Thus, these results suggest both spleen and liver contained cells capable of internalizing and presenting a glycolipid antigen via CD1b.
CD1c-mediated antigen presentation was tested using the CD8-1 human T cell line, which recognizes a microbial lipid called mannosylphosphomycoketide (MPM) and also responds to structurally related mammalian lipids called mannosylphosphodolichols [7]. Similar to the results for CD1a-mediated antigen presentation, we found that co-incubation of the CD8-1 cells with hu-NSG splenocytes resulted in marked IFN-γ secretion, and there was little evidence of enhanced responses in the presence of added MPM (Figure 4C, left panel). However, when CD8-1 cells were incubated with liver mononuclear cells from hu-NSG mice there was only modest cytokine production in the absence of added antigen, and clear dose-dependent increases were observed in response to added MPM (Figure 4C, right panel). From these results, it seems that APCs in hu-NSG liver can present added glycolipid antigens via CD1c. However, it is not clear whether the comparatively abundant CD1c+ cells we detected in our flow cytometric analyses of hu-NSG spleen samples (see Figure 3A) are also able to present an exogenous glycolipid.
Finally, we used a human invariant NKT cell clone to investigate CD1d-mediated antigen presentation. Human iNKT cells respond to the synthetic glycolipid α-GalCer as a strong TCR agonist [36], but they typically also show detectable cytokine production in response to CD1d+ APCs in the absence of added antigens, which is thought to be due to recognition of endogenous CD1d ligands such as lyso-phosphatidylcholine [29]. Similar to the autoreactive responses of human iNKT cells to human CD1d+ APCs that we have observed previously, there was clearly detectable cytokine production when human iNKT cell clones were co-incubated with either spleen or liver cells from hu-NSG mice in the absence of added antigens (Figure 4D). The addition of α-GalCer stimulated increased cytokine production from co-cultures of hu-NSG spleen or liver cells with human iNKT cell clones (Figure 4D), indicating it was presented by CD1d+ APCs. Notably, the cytokine production was blocked by addition of an antibody that is specific for human CD1d and blocks iNKT cell responses to this antigen presenting molecule, but does not block their responses to murine CD1d (Figures S1 and S2). Together these results suggest that the main route of α-GalCer presentation was through human CD1d molecules. However, it important to note that murine CD1d is not ablated in these mice, and therefore it is possible that CD1d-restricted responses could also be mediated by murine APCs in this system. We also observed enhanced cytokine secretion from the addition of GalGalCer to the co-cultures of human iNKT cells with hu-NSG liver mononuclear cells (Figure S3). GalGalCer is a form of α-GalCer that requires intracellular processing in order to be recognized by iNKT cells [37], and thus this finding indicates that hu-NSG APCs are able to internalize an exogenous glycolipid and trim off excess sugars before presenting it via CD1d.
Detection and analysis of CD1-restricted T cells
Previous analyses have indicated that a significant fraction of human CD1a-, CD1b-, and CD1c-restricted T cells resemble iNKT cells in that they are able to become activated in a CD1-dependent manner in the absence of foreign antigens [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. To test for the presence of such T cells in hu-NSG mice, we performed IFN-γ ELISpot analyses using CD1-transfected K562 myelo-monocytic cells as APCs. Hu-NSG splenocytes were incubated in ELISpot wells with CD1a-, CD1b-, CD1c-, or CD1d-transfected K562 cells, or with untransfected (CD1-negative) K562 cells. K562 cells were used for these analyses because they are negative for MHC class I and II molecules, and therefore these APCs would be unlikely to stimulate an allo-response by MHC-restricted T cells [42]. The untransfected K562 cells stimulated IFN-γ spot numbers that were close to background levels (i.e. splenocytes without any added APCs). In contrast, the CD1a-, CD1b-, and CD1d-transfected K562 cells consistently stimulated greater numbers of spots (Figure 5A). In some cases, the CD1c-transfected K562 cells also stimulated elevated numbers of spots, but this was not sufficiently consistent to attain statistical significance (Figure 5A). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from healthy adult human donors showed a similar pattern of ELISpot results in response to the CD1-transfected K562 cells (Figure 5B). Moreover, we observed similar responses to the CD1-transfected K562 cells by liver mononuclear cells from engrafted mice (data not shown). Thus, the hu-NSG mice appear to possess IFN-γ producing lymphocytes that respond to CD1 molecules loaded with cellular ligands.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 5. Analysis of CD1-restricted T cell responses.
A) Splenocytes from engrafted mice were combined with human K562 antigen presenting cells transfected with the indicated CD1 molecules, or with the untransfected K562 parental cell line (“UT”), and the frequencies of IFN-γ producing cells were estimated by ELISpot analysis. Each symbol represents the mean number of spots from 3 or 4 replicate analyses of the splenocytes from one engrafted mouse. The data were statistically analyzed using a one-tailed Wilcoxon paired t-test, yielding the p values shown below the x-axis labels for each CD1 transfectant compared to the untransfected parental cell line. B) Results from a similar analysis using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) purified from healthy adult human donors.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g005
In our analyses of CD1-mediated antigen presentation by splenocytes from hu-NSG mice, we did not observe significantly increased IFN-γ secretion by splenocytes that were treated with α-GalCer compared to untreated splenocytes (Figure S4), raising the question of whether iNKT cells are present in the engrafted mice. Therefore, to specifically investigate the frequency of CD1d-restricted iNKT cells, we used CD1d tetramers loaded with α-GalCer. By flow cytometric analysis we observed T cells that stained specifically with α-GalCer loaded CD1d tetramer, whereas there was little or no staining using a vehicle treated control tetramer (Figure 6A). The frequency of CD1d tetramer+ T cells varied substantially among the hu-NSG mice tested, but the mean and the range appeared similar to that observed in PBMC samples of healthy human donors (Figure 6B). Notably, whereas commonly used laboratory strains of mice have substantially elevated frequencies of iNKT cells in the liver compared to the spleen [43], the hu-NSG mice typically showed similar frequencies of tetramer positive cells in the spleen and liver (Figure 6C). This lack of iNKT cell enrichment in the liver is similar to what has been observed in previous analyses of primary human liver samples [44], [45], [46].
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 6. Detection of iNKT cells.
A) Flow cytometric analysis of splenocytes from an engrafted mouse using fluorescently labeled human CD1d tetramer (y-axis) and an antibody against human CD3 (x-axis). The left plot shows staining using vehicle treated CD1d tetramer, and the right plot shows α-GalCer loaded CD1d tetramer. B) Percentages of CD1d tetramer-positive cells detected from splenocytes of 10 engrafted mice, compared to PBMCs from 15 healthy adult human donors. The medians for each data group are as follows: spleen cells from hu-NSG mice, tetramer+vehicle = 0.0039%, tetramer+α-GalCer = 0.048%; human PBMCs, CD1d tetramer+vehicle = 0.0041%, CD1d tetramer+α-GalCer = 0.0745%. C) Analysis of the splenocytes and liver mononuclear cells from 4 engrafted mice for human cells stained by CD3 and α-GalCer loaded CD1d tetramer.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g006
To investigate the TCR usage of CD1d-restricted NKT cells from hu-NSG mice, we sorted T cells stained by the α-GalCer loaded CD1d tetramer and expanded them in vitro. CD1d tetramer-positive and -negative T cells were sorted separately, and expanded by exposure to PHA and irradiated allogeneic human feeder cells in the presence of recombinant IL-2. Flow cytometric analysis of the expanded cells indicated that the CD1d tetramer-positive cells used Vα24 and Vβ11 TCR chains, whereas the tetramer-negative T cell line sorted in parallel showed little or no staining for these TCR chains (Figure 7A). The CD1d tetramer-positive cells secreted cytokines in response to CD1d-transfected APCs that were pulsed with α-GalCer, but did not respond to the untransfected parental cell line, and the cytokine secretion was blocked by an anti-CD1d antibody (Figure 7B). DNA sequence analysis confirmed that the TCRα chain of the CD1d tetramer-positive cells was Vα24, and demonstrated that it was rearranged to Jα18 using the same canonical rearrangement found in human iNKT cells (Figure 7C, top). Analysis of the TCRβ chain identified a single dominant sequence consisting of Vβ11 rearranged to Jβ2.7, with a unique sequence at the V-J junctional region that is suggestive of N-region diversification (Figure 7C, bottom). Thus, the hu-NSG mice possess human CD1d-restricted T cells that utilize the canonical TCRa chain paired with Vβ11, and that recognize α-GalCer presented by CD1d.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 7. Analysis of hu-NSG NKT cells.
CD1d tetramer-positive and -negative T cells were flow cytometrically sorted from an engrafted mouse and expanded in vitro. A) Flow cytometric analysis of the expanded cells (tetramer-positive top row, tetramer-negative bottom row). Filled histograms show staining with fluorescently labeled anti-CD3, α-GalCer loaded human CD1d tetramer, anti-Vα24, and anti-Vβ11 antibodies, respectively. Open histograms show staining with vehicle treated CD1d tetramer or isotype-matched negative control antibodies. B) Cytokine secretion by the tetramer-positive and -negative cell lines in response to CD1d-transfected or untransfected (UT) APCs in the presence of α-GalCer. Open bars indicate assays that were performed in the presence of an anti-CD1d blocking antibody, and filled bars show assays performed in the presence of an isotype matched negative control antibody. C) Predicted amino acid sequences of the junctional regions of the TCRα and β chains from hu-NSG tetramer-positive T cells compared to those of NKT cell clones previously derived from the human tissues shown in parentheses. Dashes indicate identity with the consensus sequences shown at the bottom.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g007
Activation of NKT cells in vivo
Injection of α-GalCer into common strains of laboratory mice results in rapidly detectable immunological activation that is characterized by elevated levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 in the serum that correlate with the frequency of iNKT cells [43]. To test the effects of in vivo administration of α-GalCer in this model, hu-NSG mice were injected intraperitoneally with 3 µg of α-GalCer or an equivalent amount of vehicle alone. Blood samples were taken from the mice at 2–4 or 24–48 hours post-injection, and the plasma was analyzed for human IFN-γ and IL-4 by ELISA. The median IFN-γ concentration of samples from the vehicle treated mice was 95 pg/ml, with about a third of the samples having IFN-γ values that were near or below the limit of detection for the ELISA (Figure 8A, left plot). In contrast, only one sample from the 2–4 hour post α-GalCer injection time point was below the limit of detection of the ELISA, and the median IFN-γ concentration was 240 pg/ml (Figure 8A, left plot). Although the amount of IFN-γ from the α-GalCer treated mice was only 2–3 fold greater than that of the vehicle treated mice, a Mann-Whitney test indicated that the difference is statistically significant (p<0.009). The median IFN-γ detected from the 24–48 hours post α-GalCer injection samples was 155 pg/ml, and statistical analyses indicated that this was not significantly elevated compared to the vehicle treated mice (Figure 8A, left plot). By comparison, when we incubated samples of 0.5 million human PBMCs in vitro in 0.2 mL of culture medium containing either α-GalCer or vehicle, we detected a median IFN-γ concentration of 50 pg/ml for the vehicle treated and 255 pg/ml for the α-GalCer treated samples (Figure 8A, right plot). Interestingly, whereas we were not able to detect any increased IL-4 in the culture supernatants from human PBMCs incubated in vitro with α-GalCer compared to vehicle (Figure 8B, right plot), we observed a significant increase in the amount of IL-4 detected from blood samples of hu-NSG mice taken at 2–4 hours post α-GalCer injection compared to those of vehicle treated mice (Figure 8B, left plot). These results demonstrate that treatment with α-GalCer induces a rapid biological response in vivo in the hu-NSG mice, with systemic cytokine levels apparently becoming elevated in the first few hours after treatment and then receding to baseline levels within 24–48 hours. Analysis of plasma samples from α-GalCer or vehicle treated mice that were taken at 48-hours post-injection showed no difference in levels of the liver transaminases AST and ALT (Figure 8C), suggesting that the liver injury that has been observed in laboratory mice following α-GalCer treatment is much less significant in this model [47].
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure 8. Activation of NKT cells in vivo.
A) The plot on the left shows results from engrafted mice that were injected intraperitoneally with 3 µg α-GalCer or with an equivalent amount of vehicle alone. Blood samples were collected at 2–4 and 24–48 hours after injection and analyzed for human IFN-γ by ELISA. Each symbol represents the mean of 3 replicates. The P value shown on the plot was calculated using a one-tailed unpaired t test. The plot on the right shows results from human PBMC samples that were incubated in vitro with α-GalCer or vehicle alone. Supernatants were collected after 48 hours and analyzed for IFN-γ by ELISA. The P value shown on the right plot was calculated using a one-tailed paired t test. B) Results from the same experiments analyzed for human IL-4 by ELISA. C) Heparinized plasma samples taken at 48-hours post injection were analyzed for enzyme activity of the liver transaminases AST and ALT, which serve as biomarkers of liver injury. The plot shows the enzyme activities detected from samples from mice that were treated with vehicle (open squares) or with α-GalCer (filled squares). There are no significant differences between the groups.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.g008
Discussion
Great progress has been made using murine model systems to understand the development and function of CD1d-restricted iNKT cells, however, it remains unclear whether human iNKT cells are identical to their murine counterparts. Additionally, little is known about the development and in vivo function of T cells that are restricted by other CD1 molecules. The analyses presented here demonstrate that immunodeficient mice that are transplanted with human tissues (hematopoietic stem cells, fetal thymus, and fetal liver) develop a functional human CD1 antigen presenting system in the periphery and acquire human iNKT cells with a canonical TCR rearrangement. Additionally, our findings suggest that the development of other human CD1-restricted T cells is supported. Thus, these mice provide a very promising model system for further investigating specific aspects of the development and functions of human CD1-restricted T cells in vivo.
In this model system NSG mice are engrafted with human tissues when they are six to eight weeks old. At this age the murine thymus appears to have atrophied and disappeared (presumably because the mice do not produce their own T cells). In any case, we are not able to detect a murine thymus even after engraftment of the human hematopoietic stem cells (data not shown). Therefore, it is not clear whether any of the developing human T cells in this model are selected on murine antigen presenting molecules. However, it is clear that the transplanted human fetal thymic tissue increases in size and persists as a long-lasting thymic organoid. We show here for the first time that there is prominent expression of CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, and CD1d molecules by human T cells in this thymic organoid. In our histological analyses, we observed that there were two distinct CD1a+ cell types in the thymic organoid: abundant small, round lymphocytic cells that appear to be cortical thymocytes, and less abundant, larger cells in the medullary area that may be DCs. An interesting possibility is that these two populations are involved in different aspects of thymic selection of CD1-restricted T cells. Whereas MHC-restricted T cells are positively selected by MHC molecules expressed on thymic epithelial cells in the thymic cortex, murine CD1d-restricted NKT cells have been shown to be positively selected in the thymic cortex by CD4 and CD8 double positive thymocytes [32]. Thus, we would expect that the CD1+ cortical thymocytes present in the human thymic organoid might mediate positive selection of CD1a-, CD1b-, CD1c-, or CD1d-restricted human T cells. Moreover, since negative selection of murine NKT cells appears to be mediated by DCs of hematopoietic origin [33], we would hypothesize that the CD1a+ DC-like cells we observed in the medullary regions of the human thymic organoid might play a role in negative selection.
We also found expression of CD1 molecules by human cells in peripheral tissues of engrafted mice. CD1c and CD1d were clearly detectable on myeloid cell types that were present in the spleen (see Figure 3) and in the liver (data not shown), and these CD1 molecules were also expressed by B lymphocytes (Figure 3). Splenocytes expressing CD1a or CD1b appeared infrequent by flow cytometric analysis, but by histological analysis we were able to detect rare cells that stained positively for CD1a in the spleen, as well as somewhat more abundant CD1a+ cells in liver and lung sections. Functional analyses demonstrated that liver mononuclear cells from engrafted mice were able present specific glycolipid antigens to CD1a-, CD1b-, CD1c-, or CD1d-restricted human T cells. Spleen cells were able to present glycolipid antigens to CD1b- and CD1d-restricted T cells, but the CD1a- and CD1c-restricted T cells we tested showed a high response to the splenocytes alone (without added antigen) and it was difficult to see enhanced activation in response to added antigen. Thus, the splenic APCs may stimulate responses by some CD1-resticted T cells that are not dependent on the addition of foreign antigens. It is not clear whether this is due to presentation of endogenous antigens by the relevant CD1 molecules, or whether this is due to some sort of cross-reactivity by the human T cell lines tested here for murine antigen presenting molecules. We favor the first explanation, since the antigen-independent responses were not apparent using the liver APCs (which would also be expected to contain cells expressing murine antigen presenting molecules), however, further studies will be required to determine whether xeno-presentation is a factor.
Our ELISpot analyses revealed that there are cells in the spleens of engrafted mice that produce IFN-γ in a CD1-dependent manner without requiring addition of foreign glycolipids, suggesting the presence of CD1-restricted T cells that respond to endogenous antigens. This is similar to previous observations of CD1-restricted cells from human tissue samples that are not dependent on the addition of foreign antigens [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]. Flow cytometric analyses using human CD1d tetramers revealed a T cell population that was specifically stained by α-GalCer loaded tetramer, and analysis of a cell line derived from the tetramer-stained population demonstrated the use of a canonically rearranged TCR. Whereas murine iNKT cells comprise about 1–5% of splenic T cells and 10–30% in the liver, the iNKT cell subset generally comprised about 0.1% of the total human T cells in the spleens of the engrafted mice, and the frequency did not appear to be enriched in the liver. The iNKT cell frequencies we observed in the hu-NSG mice and their lack of enrichment in the liver are consistent with iNKT cell frequencies observed in previous analyses of human tissues [22], [44], [45], [46], and this therefore appears to constitute an important difference between humans and commonly used strains of laboratory mice. Given the differences in iNKT cell frequency between the hu-NSG mice and laboratory strains, it is perhaps not surprising that injection of α-GalCer resulted in only modest increases in IFN-γ and IL-4 levels in the blood of engrafted mice, and did not appear to produce elevated levels of transaminase enzymes that are indicative of damage to the liver. Nevertheless, our data indicate that there is a rapid cytokine response to α-GalCer in vivo in the engrafted mice, which suggests that these mice will be a valuable tool for investigating the impact of glycolipid antigens in a human immune context.
The CD1 system has a number of key advantages from the perspective of developing new methods of therapeutic immune modulation: the antigens utilized by the CD1 system are highly conserved molecules that may reduce the chances of pathogen escape through mutation, also there is very little allelic polymorphism in the human CD1 system, and finally, CD1-restricted T cells seem to temporally bridge the innate and adaptive immune systems during immune activation and therefore they may occupy a very powerful functional niche. Although humanized mouse models are not without concerns, for example, batch to batch variations, heterogeneity of engraftment within batches, and the possibility of artifacts due to the chimeric nature of the immune system, our results suggest that the hu-NSG mouse model described here will be an extremely useful tool for studying the thymic development and peripheral function of human CD1-restricted T cells in vivo. Moreover these mice provide a highly novel opportunity to study the role of the CD1 system in vivo during immune responses to human specific pathogens such as Epstein-Barr virus, HIV, and Dengue.
Materials and Methods
Generation of humanized mice
Research involving mice was performed in accordance with a protocol that was approved by the University of Wisconsin's Animal Care and Use Committee, and in accordance with a protocol approved by the University of Wisconsin's Institutional Review Board. NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid IL2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ mice (abbreviated as NOD/SCID/γcnull or “NSG” mice) were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (stock #005557). At 6–8 weeks old, mice were conditioned with sub-lethal (2.5 Gy) whole-body irradiation, and within 4 hours were surgically implanted under the kidney capsule with fragments (approximately 1 mm3) of human fetal thymus and liver (14–22 weeks gestation). Immediately following this surgery, the mice were given an intravenous injection (4×105/mouse) of CD34+ cells isolated from autologous fetal liver tissue that was processed and stored in X-vivo 15 serum free culture medium (Cambrex Biosciences Walkersville, MD). The CD34+ cells were prepared by gently disrupting the liver tissue by cutting it into small pieces and repeatedly pipetting up and down, then filtering the resulting cell suspension through a 70 µm mesh, and purifying the mononuclear cells by Ficoll-Paque density gradient separation (GE Healthsciences). CD34+ cells were then isolated by magnetic sorting (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The purity of the injected CD34+ cells was determined by flow cytometric analysis to be at least 80–90%, with less than 0.5% contamination of CD3+ cells. The drinking water for the mice was supplemented with 0.17–0.25 mg/ml Enrofloxacin (Bayer Healthcare, KS) for 10 days post surgery to prevent infections.
Flow cytometric analysis
Antibodies used to detect specific human markers were as follows: pan CD45 (clone HI30); CD4 (clone RPA-T4 or OKT4); CD8α (clone RPA-T8); CD14 (clone M5E2); CD19 (clone HIB19); CD11c (clone S-HCL-3); CD123 (clone 9F5); pan HLA class I (clone W6/32); pan HLA class II (clone LN3); CD1a (clone OKT6); CD1b (clone BCD1b3.1); CD1c (clone BDCA-1); CD1d (clone CD1d42); CD3 (clone SPVT-3b); Vα24 (clone C15B12); Vβ11 (clone C21D2). Negative control antibodies were clone P3 (IgG1) and clone UPC10 (IgG2a). For flow cytometric analysis, tissues (i.e. bone marrow, spleen, liver, blood, thymic organoid) were collected from mice 12–20 weeks after implantation of human cells. Human tissue samples used as controls (i.e. blood and spleen) were collected in accordance with a protocol approved by the University of Wisconsin Minimal Risk IRB. Single cell suspensions were prepared from solid tissues by gentle homogenization followed by filtration through a 0.45 µm strainer. Samples were subject to ACK lysis to remove red blood cells, or mononuclear cells were purified by density gradient centrifugation. The samples were blocked with human and murine serum, and then incubated on ice for 30 minutes with 10 µg/ml specific antibodies in FACS buffer (1 mg/ml PBS/BSA) containing 10 µg/ml 4′, 6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) or propidium iodide (PI). The samples were washed with FACS buffer, then resuspended and analyzed on a Becton Dickenson LSRII or a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. Data were analyzed using Flowjo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR).
Histologic analysis
Tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections from liver, spleen, lung, lymph node and thymic organoid were de-paraffinized and rehydrated with water for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining or immunohistochemistry. Antigen retrieval was performed using rodent decloaker (Biocare Medical), followed by incubation with a mouse monoclonal against human CD1a (clone CD1a007, Biocare Medical). Antibody labeling was detected and visualized by the Mouse-on-Mouse Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-Polymer Kit with diamionbenzidine (DAB) development (Biocare Medical).
Antigen presentation analyses
Spleen and liver tissues were collected from mice 12–20 weeks after implantation of human cells, and single cell suspensions were prepared. The samples were tested for stimulation of human CD1-restricted cell lines in the presence or absence of purified or synthetic lipid antigens. Assays were carried out in 96-well round bottom plates in 200 µl culture medium (RPMI 1640, 10% Bovine Calf Serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 µg/ml each of penicillin and streptomycin), using 5×104/well hu-NSG cells and an equal number of human T cells. After 16 hours incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator, culture supernatants were collected and tested for cytokine concentration using commercially available ELISA reagents. Human T cell lines used were as follows: CD8-2, a CD1a-restricted T cell line [48]; LDN5, a CD1b-restricted T cell line [11]; CD8-1, a CD1c-restricted T cell line [48]; and J24L.17, J3N.5, or Jc2.4, human CD1d-restricted NKT cell clones, [36], [49]. Human T cell lines were cultured in T cell medium (RPMI 1640 medium, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 µg/ml each of penicillin and streptomycin, 10% FBS, 5% bovine calf serum, 5% human AB serum from Gemini Bio-Products, and 400 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 from Chiron), with periodic re-stimulation by irradiated allogeneic feeder cells and PHA.
Lipid antigens
For stimulation of the CD1a-restricted CD8-2 line, a fraction enriched for the lipopeptide didehydroxymycobactin (DDM) was purified from M. tuberculosis [14]. For stimulation of the CD1b-restricted LDN5 line, a long chain form of glucose monomycolate (GMM C80) was purified from M. phlei [11]. For stimulation of the CD1c-restricted CD8-1 line, a synthetic preparation of mannosyl-β1-phosphomycoketide (MPM C32) was used [50]. For in vitro analyses of CD1d-restricted NKT cells, α-GalCer was prepared as described [51]. CD1a-, CD1b-, and CD1c-restricted T cell lipid antigens were stored in organic solvents at −20°C, and prior to use were transferred to glass vials and dried down under nitrogen gas, then resuspended in culture medium and sonicated in a heated water bath. α-GalCer was dissolved in DMSO at 100 µg/ml, and this solution was sonicated then diluted into culture medium prior to use. For in vivo injection, α-GalCer was synthesized by coupling 2,3,4,6-tetra-(O-trimethylsilyl)-D-galactosyl iodide with a sphingosine acceptor containing azide functionality, and the resulting compound was modified by azide-reduction, N-acylation and deprotection of benzyl-protected hydroxyl groups. The α-GalCer was dissolved in a vehicle solution containing 0.5% Tween 20, 5.7% sucrose, and 0.75% histidine.
ELISpot analyses of CD1-restricted T cell frequency
Mononuclear cells were prepared from hu-NSG spleen or liver, or from human peripheral blood. Human blood was collected with written consent from volunteer donors, in accordance with a protocol approved by the University of Wisconsin's Minimal Risk Institutional Review Board. The samples were incubated with untransfected human K562 myelomonocytic cells [52] or with K562 cells that were transfected with human CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, or CD1d, at a 1∶1 ratio (200,000 cells per well total) in serum-free medium (CELLect medium, MP Biomedicals, Inc.) in 96-well PVDF membrane plates (Whatman) coated with anti-human IFN-γ mAb (clone NIB42 from Biolegend). The cells were incubated for 48 hr at 37°C and 5% CO2. Secreted IFN-γ was detected using biotinylated anti-human IFN-γ mAb (clone M701B from Thermo Scientific), and revealed by development with streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase and BCIP/NBT chromogenic substrate. Spots were quantitated using AID 5.0 software.
Generation of CD1d-restricted T cell line
Hu-NSG spleen was sterilely harvested and mononuclear cells were purified by density gradient centrifugation. The cells were then stained with sterile fluorescently labeled antibodies against human CD3 and CD19, and with human CD1d tetramer loaded with α-GalCer. Between 50 and 75 tetramer-positive human T cells were flow cytometrically sorted into a well of a 96-well tissue culture plate and cultured with irradiated allogeneic human PBMCs in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 µg/ml penicillin and streptomycin, 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 5% bovine calf serum (Hyclone), 3% human AB serum (Atlanta Biologicals), PHA (Sigma) and 400 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 (Chiron).
TCR sequence analysis
Total RNA was prepared from approximately 1–5×106 CD1d-restricted T cells using Trizol (Invitrogen), and 1 µg was used for preparation of cDNA using commercially available reagents (Roche). DNA sequences spanning the junctional regions of the TCRα and β chains were amplified by PCR using forward primers that sit down in the Vα24 or Vβ11 gene segments (5′-AAGATACTGGGAGAGGTCCTGTTTC-3′ or 5′-CCAGGAATGGAACTACACCTCATC-3′, respectively), and reverse primers that sit down in the TCRα or β constant domains (5′-GAATAATGCTGTTGTTGAAGGCG-3′ or 5′-TTGACAGCGGAAGTGGTTGC-3′, respectively). The resulting PCR products were purified by spin column or agarose gel extraction (QIAquick from QIAGEN), and were sequenced using the same primers that were used for amplification.
Supporting Information
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Figure S1.
Cytokine production from previously established human iNKT cell clones (Jc25., Jc2.8, JJ2.7) in response to spleen cells from an engrafted mouse treated with α-GalCer is blocked by addition of the CD1d42 anti-human CD1d monoclonal antibody, but not by an isotype-matched negative control antibody.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.s001
(TIF)
Figure S2.
The CD1d42 antibody blocks iNKT cell responses to human but not murine CD1d. Untransfected P815 cells (no CD1d), P815 cells transfected with murine CD1d, and P815 cells transfected with human CD1d were treated with α-GalCer and incubated with a human iNKT cell clone (Jc2.5) in the presence of the anti-CD1d antibody CD1d42 (black bars) or an isotype control mAb (grey bars).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.s002
(TIF)
Figure S3.
CD1d-mediated antigen presentation by liver cells from engrafted mice was tested using the human iNKT cell clone J24L.17 and a glycolipid called GalGalCer, which requires glycosidic cleavage of the terminal galactose sugar in order to be recognized by iNKT cells.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.s003
(TIF)
Figure S4.
Splenocytes from an engrafted mouse show no significant responses to antigens used for evaluation of CD1-mediated antigen presentation to human T cell lines.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701.s004
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Gurdyal S. Besra (University of Birmingham) for kindly providing the α-GalCer lipid preparation that was used for in vitro analyses.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: JLL XC DR WJB JEG. Performed the experiments: JLL XC YZ DR DAR SH SG. Analyzed the data: JLL XC JEG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: T-YC RJA GFP DBM. Wrote the paper: JEG.
Citation: Lockridge JL, Chen X, Zhou Y, Rajesh D, Roenneburg DA, Hegde S, et al. (2011) Analysis of the CD1 Antigen Presenting System in Humanized SCID Mice. PLoS ONE 6(6): e21701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021701
1. Brigl M, Brenner MB (2004) CD1: Antigen Presentation and T Cell Function. Annu Rev Immunol 22: 817–890.M. BriglMB Brenner2004CD1: Antigen Presentation and T Cell Function.Annu Rev Immunol22817890
2. Martin LH, Calabi F, Milstein C (1986) Isolation of CD1 genes: a family of major histocompatibility complex-related differentiation antigens. PNAS 83: 9154–9158.LH MartinF. CalabiC. Milstein1986Isolation of CD1 genes: a family of major histocompatibility complex-related differentiation antigens.PNAS8391549158
3. Gumperz JE (2006) The ins and outs of CD1 molecules: bringing lipids under immunological surveillance. Traffic 7: 2–13.JE Gumperz2006The ins and outs of CD1 molecules: bringing lipids under immunological surveillance.Traffic7213
4. Sieling PA, Jullien D, Dahlem M, Tedder TF, Rea TH, et al. (1999) CD1 expression by dendritic cells in human leprosy lesions: correlation with effective host immunity. J Immunol 162: 1851–1858.PA SielingD. JullienM. DahlemTF TedderTH Rea1999CD1 expression by dendritic cells in human leprosy lesions: correlation with effective host immunity.J Immunol16218511858
5. Sieling PA, Ochoa MT, Jullien D, Leslie DS, Sabet S, et al. (2000) Evidence for human CD4+ T cells in the CD1-restricted repertoire: derivation of mycobacteria-reactive T cells from leprosy lesions. J Immunol 164: 4790–4796.PA SielingMT OchoaD. JullienDS LeslieS. Sabet2000Evidence for human CD4+ T cells in the CD1-restricted repertoire: derivation of mycobacteria-reactive T cells from leprosy lesions.J Immunol16447904796
6. Moody DB, Guy MR, Grant E, Cheng TY, Brenner MB, et al. (2000) CD1b-mediated T cell recognition of a glycolipid antigen generated from mycobacterial lipid and host carbohydrate during infection. J Exp Med 192: 965–976.DB MoodyMR GuyE. GrantTY ChengMB Brenner2000CD1b-mediated T cell recognition of a glycolipid antigen generated from mycobacterial lipid and host carbohydrate during infection.J Exp Med192965976
7. Moody DB, Ulrichs T, Muhlecker W, Young DC, Gurcha SS, et al. (2000) CD1c-mediated T-cell recognition of isoprenoid glycolipids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Nature 404: 884–888.DB MoodyT. UlrichsW. MuhleckerDC YoungSS Gurcha2000CD1c-mediated T-cell recognition of isoprenoid glycolipids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Nature404884888
8. Ulrichs T, Moody DB, Grant E, Kaufmann SH, Porcelli SA (2003) T-cell responses to CD1-presented lipid antigens in humans with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infect Immun 71: 3076–3087.T. UlrichsDB MoodyE. GrantSH KaufmannSA Porcelli2003T-cell responses to CD1-presented lipid antigens in humans with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.Infect Immun7130763087
9. Beckman EM, Porcelli SA, Morita CT, Behar SM, Furlong ST, et al. (1994) Recognition of a lipid antigen by CD1-restricted alpha beta+ T cells. Nature 372: 691–694.EM BeckmanSA PorcelliCT MoritaSM BeharST Furlong1994Recognition of a lipid antigen by CD1-restricted alpha beta+ T cells.Nature372691694
10. Sieling PA, Chatterjee D, Porcelli SA, Prigozy TI, Mazzaccaro RJ, et al. (1995) CD1-restricted T cell recognition of microbial lipoglycan antigens. Science 269: 227–230.PA SielingD. ChatterjeeSA PorcelliTI PrigozyRJ Mazzaccaro1995CD1-restricted T cell recognition of microbial lipoglycan antigens.Science269227230
11. Moody DB, Reinhold BB, Guy MR, Beckman EM, Frederique DE, et al. (1997) Structural requirements for glycolipid antigen recognition by CD1b-restricted T cells. Science 278: 283–286.DB MoodyBB ReinholdMR GuyEM BeckmanDE Frederique1997Structural requirements for glycolipid antigen recognition by CD1b-restricted T cells.Science278283286
12. Gilleron M, Stenger S, Mazorra Z, Wittke F, Mariotti S, et al. (2004) Diacylated sulfoglycolipids are novel mycobacterial antigens stimulating CD1-restricted T cells during infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med 199: 649–659.M. GilleronS. StengerZ. MazorraF. WittkeS. Mariotti2004Diacylated sulfoglycolipids are novel mycobacterial antigens stimulating CD1-restricted T cells during infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.J Exp Med199649659
13. Matsunaga I, Bhatt A, Young DC, Cheng TY, Eyles SJ, et al. (2004) Mycobacterium tuberculosis pks12 produces a novel polyketide presented by CD1c to T cells. J Exp Med 200: 1559–1569.I. MatsunagaA. BhattDC YoungTY ChengSJ Eyles2004Mycobacterium tuberculosis pks12 produces a novel polyketide presented by CD1c to T cells.J Exp Med20015591569
14. Moody DB, Young DC, Cheng TY, Rosat JP, Roura-Mir C, et al. (2004) T cell activation by lipopeptide antigens. Science 303: 527–531.DB MoodyDC YoungTY ChengJP RosatC. Roura-Mir2004T cell activation by lipopeptide antigens.Science303527531
15. Spinozzi F, Porcelli SA (2007) Recognition of lipids from pollens by CD1-restricted T cells. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 27: 79–92.F. SpinozziSA Porcelli2007Recognition of lipids from pollens by CD1-restricted T cells.Immunol Allergy Clin North Am277992
16. Shamshiev A, Donda A, Carena I, Mori L, Kappos L, et al. (1999) Self glycolipids as T-cell autoantigens. Eur J Immunol 29: 1667–1675.A. ShamshievA. DondaI. CarenaL. MoriL. Kappos1999Self glycolipids as T-cell autoantigens.Eur J Immunol2916671675
17. Sieling PA, Porcelli SA, Duong BT, Spada F, Bloom BR, et al. (2000) Human double-negative T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus provide help for IgG and are restricted by CD1c. J Immunol 165: 5338–5344.PA SielingSA PorcelliBT DuongF. SpadaBR Bloom2000Human double-negative T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus provide help for IgG and are restricted by CD1c.J Immunol16553385344
18. Dascher CC, Brenner MB (2003) Evolutionary constraints on CD1 structure: insights from comparative genomic analysis. Trends Immunol 24: 412–418.CC DascherMB Brenner2003Evolutionary constraints on CD1 structure: insights from comparative genomic analysis.Trends Immunol24412418
19. Miller MM, Wang C, Parisini E, Coletta RD, Goto RM, et al. (2005) Characterization of two avian MHC-like genes reveals an ancient origin of the CD1 family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 8674–8679.MM MillerC. WangE. ParisiniRD ColettaRM Goto2005Characterization of two avian MHC-like genes reveals an ancient origin of the CD1 family.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A10286748679
20. Van Kaer L (2007) NKT cells: T lymphocytes with innate effector functions. Curr Opin Immunol 19: 354–364.L. Van Kaer2007NKT cells: T lymphocytes with innate effector functions.Curr Opin Immunol19354364
21. Yu KO, Porcelli SA (2005) The diverse functions of CD1d-restricted NKT cells and their potential for immunotherapy. Immunol Lett 100: 42–55.KO YuSA Porcelli2005The diverse functions of CD1d-restricted NKT cells and their potential for immunotherapy.Immunol Lett1004255
22. Gumperz JE, Miyake S, Yamamura T, Brenner MB (2002) Functionally Distinct Subsets of CD1d-restricted Natural Killer T Cells Revealed by CD1d Tetramer Staining. J Exp Med 195: 625–636.JE GumperzS. MiyakeT. YamamuraMB Brenner2002Functionally Distinct Subsets of CD1d-restricted Natural Killer T Cells Revealed by CD1d Tetramer Staining.J Exp Med195625636
23. Matsuda JL, Naidenko OV, Gapin L, Nakayama T, Taniguchi M, et al. (2000) Tracking the response of natural killer T cells to a glycolipid antigen using CD1d tetramers. J Exp Med 192: 741–754.JL MatsudaOV NaidenkoL. GapinT. NakayamaM. Taniguchi2000Tracking the response of natural killer T cells to a glycolipid antigen using CD1d tetramers.J Exp Med192741754
24. Chiu YH, Jayawardena J, Weiss A, Lee D, Park SH, et al. (1999) Distinct subsets of CD1d-restricted T cells recognize self-antigens loaded in different cellular compartments. J Exp Med 189: 103–110.YH ChiuJ. JayawardenaA. WeissD. LeeSH Park1999Distinct subsets of CD1d-restricted T cells recognize self-antigens loaded in different cellular compartments.J Exp Med189103110
25. Chiu YH, Park SH, Benlagha K, Forestier C, Jayawardena-Wolf J, et al. (2002) Multiple defects in antigen presentation and T cell development by mice expressing cytoplasmic tail-truncated CD1d. Nat Immunol 3: 55–60.YH ChiuSH ParkK. BenlaghaC. ForestierJ. Jayawardena-Wolf2002Multiple defects in antigen presentation and T cell development by mice expressing cytoplasmic tail-truncated CD1d.Nat Immunol35560
26. Chen X, Wang X, Keaton JM, Reddington F, Illarionov PA, et al. (2007) Distinct endosomal trafficking requirements for presentation of autoantigens and exogenous lipids by human CD1d molecules. J Immunol 178: 6181–6190.X. ChenX. WangJM KeatonF. ReddingtonPA Illarionov2007Distinct endosomal trafficking requirements for presentation of autoantigens and exogenous lipids by human CD1d molecules.J Immunol17861816190
27. Christiansen D, Milland J, Mouhtouris E, Vaughan H, Pellicci DG, et al. (2008) Humans lack iGb3 due to the absence of functional iGb3-synthase: implications for NKT cell development and transplantation. PLoS Biol 6: e172.D. ChristiansenJ. MillandE. MouhtourisH. VaughanDG Pellicci2008Humans lack iGb3 due to the absence of functional iGb3-synthase: implications for NKT cell development and transplantation.PLoS Biol6e172
28. Zhou D, Mattner J, Cantu C 3rd, Schrantz N, Yin N, et al. (2004) Lysosomal glycosphingolipid recognition by NKT cells. Science 306: 1786–1789.D. ZhouJ. MattnerC. Cantu 3rdN. SchrantzN. Yin2004Lysosomal glycosphingolipid recognition by NKT cells.Science30617861789
29. Fox LM, Cox DG, Lockridge JL, Wang X, Chen X, et al. (2009) Recognition of lyso-phospholipids by human natural killer T lymphocytes. PLoS Biol 7: e1000228.LM FoxDG CoxJL LockridgeX. WangX. Chen2009Recognition of lyso-phospholipids by human natural killer T lymphocytes.PLoS Biol7e1000228
30. Lan P, Tonomura N, Shimizu A, Wang S, Yang YG (2006) Reconstitution of a functional human immune system in immunodeficient mice through combined human fetal thymus/liver and CD34+ cell transplantation. Blood 108: 487–492.P. LanN. TonomuraA. ShimizuS. WangYG Yang2006Reconstitution of a functional human immune system in immunodeficient mice through combined human fetal thymus/liver and CD34+ cell transplantation.Blood108487492
31. Rajesh D, Zhou Y, Jankowska-Gan E, Roenneburg DA, Dart ML, et al. (2010) Th1 and Th17 immunocompetence in humanized NOD/SCID/IL2rgammanull mice. Hum Immunol 71: 551–559.D. RajeshY. ZhouE. Jankowska-GanDA RoenneburgML Dart2010Th1 and Th17 immunocompetence in humanized NOD/SCID/IL2rgammanull mice.Hum Immunol71551559
32. Wei DG, Lee H, Park SH, Beaudoin L, Teyton L, et al. (2005) Expansion and long-range differentiation of the NKT cell lineage in mice expressing CD1d exclusively on cortical thymocytes. J Exp Med 202: 239–248.DG WeiH. LeeSH ParkL. BeaudoinL. Teyton2005Expansion and long-range differentiation of the NKT cell lineage in mice expressing CD1d exclusively on cortical thymocytes.J Exp Med202239248
33. Chun T, Page MJ, Gapin L, Matsuda JL, Xu H, et al. (2003) CD1d-expressing dendritic cells but not thymic epithelial cells can mediate negative selection of NKT cells. J Exp Med 197: 907–918.T. ChunMJ PageL. GapinJL MatsudaH. Xu2003CD1d-expressing dendritic cells but not thymic epithelial cells can mediate negative selection of NKT cells.J Exp Med197907918
34. Exley M, Garcia J, Wilson SB, Spada F, Gerdes D, et al. (2000) CD1d structure and regulation on human thymocytes, peripheral blood T cells, B cells and monocytes. Immunology 100: 37–47.M. ExleyJ. GarciaSB WilsonF. SpadaD. Gerdes2000CD1d structure and regulation on human thymocytes, peripheral blood T cells, B cells and monocytes.Immunology1003747
35. Moody DB, Briken V, Cheng TY, Roura-Mir C, Guy MR, et al. (2002) Lipid length controls antigen entry into endosomal and nonendosomal pathways for CD1b presentation. Nat Immunol 3: 435–442.DB MoodyV. BrikenTY ChengC. Roura-MirMR Guy2002Lipid length controls antigen entry into endosomal and nonendosomal pathways for CD1b presentation.Nat Immunol3435442
36. Wang X, Chen X, Rodenkirch L, Simonson W, Wernimont S, et al. (2008) Natural killer T-cell autoreactivity leads to a specialized activation state. Blood 112: 4128–4138.X. WangX. ChenL. RodenkirchW. SimonsonS. Wernimont2008Natural killer T-cell autoreactivity leads to a specialized activation state.Blood11241284138
37. Prigozy TI, Naidenko O, Qasba P, Elewaut D, Brossay L, et al. (2001) Glycolipid antigen processing for presentation by CD1d molecules. Science 291: 664–667.TI PrigozyO. NaidenkoP. QasbaD. ElewautL. Brossay2001Glycolipid antigen processing for presentation by CD1d molecules.Science291664667
38. Porcelli S, Brenner MB, Greenstein JL, Balk SP, Terhorst C, et al. (1989) Recognition of cluster of differentiation 1 antigens by human CD4-CD8-cytolytic T lymphocytes. Nature 341: 447–450.S. PorcelliMB BrennerJL GreensteinSP BalkC. Terhorst1989Recognition of cluster of differentiation 1 antigens by human CD4-CD8-cytolytic T lymphocytes.Nature341447450
39. Spada FM, Grant EP, Peters PJ, Sugita M, Melian A, et al. (2000) Self-recognition of CD1 by gamma/delta T cells: Implications for innate immunity. J Exp Med 191: 937–948.FM SpadaEP GrantPJ PetersM. SugitaA. Melian2000Self-recognition of CD1 by gamma/delta T cells: Implications for innate immunity.J Exp Med191937948
40. Vincent MS, Xiong X, Grant EP, Peng W, Brenner MB (2005) CD1a-, b-, and c-restricted TCRs recognize both self and foreign antigens. J Immunol 175: 6344–6351.MS VincentX. XiongEP GrantW. PengMB Brenner2005CD1a-, b-, and c-restricted TCRs recognize both self and foreign antigens.J Immunol17563446351
41. de Lalla C, Lepore M, Piccolo FM, Rinaldi A, Scelfo A, et al. (2011) High-frequency and adaptive-like dynamics of human CD1 self-reactive T cells. Eur J Immunol 41: 602–610.C. de LallaM. LeporeFM PiccoloA. RinaldiA. Scelfo2011High-frequency and adaptive-like dynamics of human CD1 self-reactive T cells.Eur J Immunol41602610
42. de Jong A, Pena-Cruz V, Cheng TY, Clark RA, Van Rhijn I, et al. (2010) CD1a-autoreactive T cells are a normal component of the human alphabeta T cell repertoire. Nat Immunol 11: 1102–1109.A. de JongV. Pena-CruzTY ChengRA ClarkI. Van Rhijn2010CD1a-autoreactive T cells are a normal component of the human alphabeta T cell repertoire.Nat Immunol1111021109
43. Rymarchyk SL, Lowenstein H, Mayette J, Foster SR, Damby DE, et al. (2008) Widespread natural variation in murine natural killer T-cell number and function. Immunology 125: 331–343.SL RymarchykH. LowensteinJ. MayetteSR FosterDE Damby2008Widespread natural variation in murine natural killer T-cell number and function.Immunology125331343
44. Kenna T, O'Brien M, Hogan AE, Exley MA, Porcelli SA, et al. (2007) CD1 expression and CD1-restricted T cell activity in normal and tumour-bearing human liver. Cancer Immunol Immunother 56: 563–572.T. KennaM. O'BrienAE HoganMA ExleySA Porcelli2007CD1 expression and CD1-restricted T cell activity in normal and tumour-bearing human liver.Cancer Immunol Immunother56563572
45. Durante-Mangoni E, Wang R, Shaulov A, He Q, Nasser I, et al. (2004) Hepatic CD1d expression in hepatitis C virus infection and recognition by resident proinflammatory CD1d-reactive T cells. J Immunol 173: 2159–2166.E. Durante-MangoniR. WangA. ShaulovQ. HeI. Nasser2004Hepatic CD1d expression in hepatitis C virus infection and recognition by resident proinflammatory CD1d-reactive T cells.J Immunol17321592166
46. Kita H, Naidenko OV, Kronenberg M, Ansari AA, Rogers P, et al. (2002) Quantitation and phenotypic analysis of natural killer T cells in primary biliary cirrhosis using a human CD1d tetramer. Gastroenterology 123: 1031–1043.H. KitaOV NaidenkoM. KronenbergAA AnsariP. Rogers2002Quantitation and phenotypic analysis of natural killer T cells in primary biliary cirrhosis using a human CD1d tetramer.Gastroenterology12310311043
47. Osman Y, Kawamura T, Naito T, Takeda K, Van Kaer L, et al. (2000) Activation of hepatic NKT cells and subsequent liver injury following administration of alpha-galactosylceramide. Eur J Immunol 30: 1919–1928.Y. OsmanT. KawamuraT. NaitoK. TakedaL. Van Kaer2000Activation of hepatic NKT cells and subsequent liver injury following administration of alpha-galactosylceramide.Eur J Immunol3019191928
48. Rosat JP, Grant EP, Beckman EM, Dascher CC, Sieling PA, et al. (1999) CD1-restricted microbial lipid antigen-specific recognition found in the CD8+ alpha beta T cell pool. J Immunol 162: 366–371.JP RosatEP GrantEM BeckmanCC DascherPA Sieling1999CD1-restricted microbial lipid antigen-specific recognition found in the CD8+ alpha beta T cell pool.J Immunol162366371
49. Brigl M, Bry L, Kent SC, Gumperz JE, Brenner MB (2003) Mechanism of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cell activation during microbial infection. Nat Immunol 4: 1230–1237.M. BriglL. BrySC KentJE GumperzMB Brenner2003Mechanism of CD1d-restricted natural killer T cell activation during microbial infection.Nat Immunol412301237
50. de Jong A, Arce EC, Cheng TY, van Summeren RP, Feringa BL, et al. (2007) CD1c presentation of synthetic glycolipid antigens with foreign alkyl branching motifs. Chem Biol 14: 1232–1242.A. de JongEC ArceTY ChengRP van SummerenBL Feringa2007CD1c presentation of synthetic glycolipid antigens with foreign alkyl branching motifs.Chem Biol1412321242
51. Yu KO, Im JS, Molano A, Dutronc Y, Illarionov PA, et al. (2005) Modulation of CD1d-restricted NKT cell responses by using N-acyl variants of alpha-galactosylceramides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 3383–3388.KO YuJS ImA. MolanoY. DutroncPA Illarionov2005Modulation of CD1d-restricted NKT cell responses by using N-acyl variants of alpha-galactosylceramides.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A10233833388
52. Lozzio BB, Lozzio CB (1979) Properties and usefulness of the original K-562 human myelogenous leukemia cell line. Leuk Res 3: 363–370.BB LozzioCB Lozzio1979Properties and usefulness of the original K-562 human myelogenous leukemia cell line.Leuk Res3363370
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2011 Lockridge et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
CD1 molecules are glycoproteins that present lipids and glycolipids for recognition by T cells. CD1-dependent immune activation has been implicated in a wide range of immune responses, however, our understanding of the role of this pathway in human disease remains limited because of species differences between humans and other mammals: whereas humans express five different CD1 gene products (CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, CD1d, and CD1e), muroid rodents express only one CD1 isoform (CD1d). Here we report that immune deficient mice engrafted with human fetal thymus, liver, and CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells develop a functional human CD1 compartment. CD1a, b, c, and d isoforms were highly expressed by human thymocytes, and CD1a+ cells with a dendritic morphology were present in the thymic medulla. CD1+ cells were also detected in spleen, liver, and lungs. APCs from spleen and liver were capable of presenting bacterial glycolipids to human CD1-restricted T cells. ELISpot analyses of splenocytes demonstrated the presence of CD1-reactive IFN-γ producing cells. CD1d tetramer staining directly identified human iNKT cells in spleen and liver samples from engrafted mice, and injection of the glycolipid antigen α-GalCer resulted in rapid elevation of human IFN-γ and IL-4 levels in the blood indicating that the human iNKT cells are biologically active in vivo. Together, these results demonstrate that the human CD1 system is present and functionally competent in this humanized mouse model. Thus, this system provides a new opportunity to study the role of CD1-related immune activation in infections to human-specific pathogens.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer