Human Papillomavirus Infection in HIV-1 Infected Women in Catalonia (Spain): Implications for Prevention of Cervical Cancer

Abstract

Background

High-risk human Papillomavirus infection is a necessary factor for cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer. In HIV-1-infected women, HPV infection is more prevalent and a higher risk of cervical cancer has been identified. We aimed to calculate the prevalence of infection by HR-HPV, determine the factors associated with this infection and abnormal cytology findings and to describe the history of cervical cancer screening in HIV-1-infected women.

Methods

We enrolled 479 HIV-1–infected women from the PISCIS cohort. Each patient underwent a gynecological check-up, PAP smear, HPV AND Hybrid capture, HPV genotyping, and colposcopy and biopsy, if necessary. We applied questionnaires to obtain information on sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and cervical screening variables. We present a cross-sectional analysis.

Results

Median age was 42 years. The prevalence of HR-HPV infection was 33.2% and that of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) was 3.8%. The most common genotypes were 16(23%), 53(20.3%), and 52(16.2%). The factor associated with HR-HPV infection was age <30 years (odds ratio[OR],2.5; 95%confidence interval[CI],1.1–5.6). The factors associated with the presence of HSIL or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) were CD4T-lymphocyte count <200cells/mm3 versus >500cells/mm3 (OR,8.4; 95%CI,3.7–19.2), HIV-1 viral load >10,000copies/mL versus <400copies/mL (OR,2.1; 95%CI,1.0–4.4), and use of oral contraceptives (OR,2.0; 95%CI,1.0–3.9). Sixty percent of HIV-1–infected women had had one Pap smear within the last 2 years.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of HPV infection and cervical lesions in the HIV-1–infected population in Catalonia, as well as the low coverage and frequency of screening in this group, means that better preventive efforts are necessary and should include vaccination against HPV, better accessibility to screening programs, training of health care professionals, and specific health education for HIV-1–infected women.

About the Authors:

Valeria Stuardo

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Centre d'Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Agència Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPC), Generalitat de Catalunya, Badalona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain, Escuela de Salud Pública (ESP), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile

Cristina Agustí

Affiliations Centre d'Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Agència Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPC), Generalitat de Catalunya, Badalona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

José Manuel Godinez

Affiliations Unit of Infections and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology – ICO-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, Red Temática de Investigación Coorporativa en Cáncer (RTICC), Barcelona, Spain

Alexandra Montoliu

Affiliations Centre d'Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Agència Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPC), Generalitat de Catalunya, Badalona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

Aureli Torné

Affiliation: Hospital Clínico - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

Antoni Tarrats

Affiliation: Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain

Carmen Alcalde

Affiliation: Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain

Dolores Martín

Affiliation: Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Eulalia Fernández-Montoli

Affiliation: Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Cristina Vanrell

Affiliation: Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Josefa Solé

Affiliation: Hospital de Mataró, Mataró, Spain

Yolanda Canet

Affiliation: Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain

José Manuel Marqueta

Affiliation: Hospital de Palamós, Palamós, Spain

Jadiyettu Mohamed

Affiliation: Hospital General de L'Hospitalet, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Isabel Cuenca

Affiliation: Hospital Comarcal del Alt Penedès, Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain

Montserrat Lonca

Affiliation: Hospital Clínico - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

Guillem Sirera

Affiliation: Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain

Elena Ferrer

Affiliation: Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Pere Domingo

Affiliation: Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Belen Lloveras

Affiliations Unit of Infections and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology – ICO-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Josep María Miro

Affiliation: Hospital Clínico - Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

Silvia De Sanjosé

Affiliations Unit of Infections and Cancer, Catalan Institute of Oncology – ICO-Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

Jordi Casabona

Affiliations Centre d'Estudis Epidemiològics sobre les Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual i Sida de Catalunya (CEEISCAT), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO), Agència Salut Pública de Catalunya (ASPC), Generalitat de Catalunya, Badalona, Spain, Departament de Pediatria, d'Obstetrícia i Ginecologia i de Medicina Preventiva i de Salut Pública, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

Introduction

High-risk human papillomavirus infection (HR-HPV) is a prerequisite for the development of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Several epidemiological and molecular studies have established a causal association between HPV and ICC [1], [2].

ICC accounts for 9.8% of all human cancers, and every year 500,000 new cases are diagnosed throughout the world. Around 280,000 of these women die, and at least 80% of these deaths occur in developing countries [3]. HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58 cause more than 90.0% of all cases of ICC [4].

Spain has one of the highest prevalences of HIV-1 infection in Western and Central Europe [5]. In 2006 in Catalonia, 32,932 individuals aged 15 to 64 years were infected by HIV-1. The percentage of cases of AIDS diagnosed in women increased from 14.2% in 1986 to 21.9% in 2008. ICC was the defining disease in 4.9% of women diagnosed with AIDS during 1994–2008 [6].

In Spain, the annual incidence of ICC in women of all ages is 6.3 per 100,000 inhabitants and mortality is 1.9 per 100,000 inhabitants. In young women (15 to 44 years), the incidence of ICC is 6.6 per 100,000, making it the second most common cancer after breast cancer [7].

HIV-1–infected women are more susceptible to developing HPV infection and SIL [8], [9]. In Catalonia, the prevalence of HPV infection in HIV-1–positive women exceeds 40%, much higher than the 10% observed in the general population [10]. Similarly, several studies have confirmed that, in Catalonia, the incidence of ICC in HIV-1–infected women is high, with an incidence ratio of 18.5 between HIV-1–infected women and HIV-negative women aged between 20 and 49 years [11], [12].

Several authors have discussed the question of whether the high prevalence of HPV infection and ICC in HIV-1–infected women varies depending on the effectiveness of cervical screening programs [13], [14].

With the aim of studying the association between HIV-1 infection and HR-HPV in our setting, we selected a subcohort of HIV-1–infected women from the PISCIS cohort (Project for Electronic Clinical-Epidemiologic Follow-up of HIV-1 Infection and AIDS). The objectives of the present study were to estimate the prevalence of HR-HPV infection and SIL and associated factors, to describe clinical-epidemiologic characteristics, and examine the history of cervical cancer screening in this population.

Methods

Design

The present study was designed as a cohort of HIV positive women from 9 hospitals included in PISCIS cohort. The presented manuscript only shows a cross-sectional analysis of base line data obtained during the first visit of the participating women to the gynecologist. The recruitment period was from September 2007 to March 2009

Study population

The study population was an opportunistic sample taken from patients included in the PISCIS cohort [15]. The study included a non-discriminatory inclusion, according to degree of immunosuppression, evolution of HIV infection and treatment. All women seeking medical attention at the HIV Unit during the study period were offered to participate. Patients who did not agree to participate were excluded. The participants were referred once or twice per year to the gynecology service of the hospital where they were assisted.

Nine centers from Catalonia were responsible for recruiting and following the women who participated in this study. The hospitals were Hospital Clínico-IDIBAPS (Barcelona), Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge (Hospitalet de Llobregat), Hospital de Mataró (Mataró), Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí (Sabadell), Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol (Badalona), Hospital General de L'Hospitalet (Hospitalet de Llobregat), Hospital de Palamós (Palamós), Hospital Comarcal del Alt Penedès (Vilafranca del Penedès), and Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona).

With an alpha error of 0.05, a hypothetical prevalence of HPV of 45%, and a power of 80% for an odds ratio greater than or equal to 1.9 in the risk factors study, the necessary sample size was calculated to be approximately 500 women. The sample n = 500 considered an oversizing of 10% for attrition (losses) of the sample, the power of 80% was considered for the original sample without oversizing.

The ethics committees of the participating hospitals approved the study and patients gave their signed informed consent to participate. A total of 479 HIV-1–infected patients were recruited during the study period.

Data collection instruments: questionnaires

Recruitment was carried out by internists who invited the patient to participate in the project and obtained the informed consent, they derived the recruited women to the gynecologist participating in the study and communicated to the coordinating center the number of women who had been recruited for the study.

The study was very well accepted among the women participating in the PISCIS Cohort and only 2 women refused to participate.

At the first visit, a clinical-epidemiologic questionnaire consisting of 40 questions to obtain information on sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and cervical screening variables, was administered by the gynecologist. In addition, the questionnaire included 9 questions on screening history; these 9 questions were completed by the gynecologist from medical records.

Collection and analysis of biological samples

All the patients on the first visit underwent a gynecological check-up and two biological samples were obtained: a first sample was taken for a conventional or liquid cytology test (PAP smear) for subsequent processing at the hospital. A second sample was taken to determine the presence of HPV DNA using a second-generation hybrid capture assay (Digene HC2 DNA test, QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, California, USA) and to genotype the virus (LINEAR ARRAY HPV Genotyping Test, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA). The second group of samples was processed at the HPV laboratory of the Cancer and Infections Unit (Catalan Oncologic Institute, Barcelona, Spain). The frequency of the follow-up visits and treatment depended on the results of the diagnostic tests: patients with normal cytology results and negative HPV DNA results had a follow-up visit at 12 months. Patients with an abnormal cytology result or positive HR-HPV, or both underwent colposcopy. Irrespective of the results of colposcopy, patients attended a follow-up visit at 6 months. In cases of an abnormal colposcopy result, a cervical biopsy was performed according to the internal procedures of each hospital. All those patients with cervical lesions were treated according to care protocols.

The HC2 technique identifies HPV DNA using in vitro hybridization with specific RNA probes and can detect 13 types of HR-HPV (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68).

Genotyping by Linear Array amplifies and detects a fragment of HPV DNA. The PGMY09/11 primer set targets a 450-bp region of the HPV L1 gene and can identify 37 types of HPV with a low, high, and probable oncogenic risk (6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 40, 42, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 61, 62, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 81, 82, 83, 84, IS39, and Cp6108).

HIV data

In order to cross the HIV and HPV co infection data of women participating in the study, data from HIV infection history (CD4 (cells/mm3), CV (copies/mL), treatment, etc.) of each patient were retrieved from the PISCIS Cohort databases this information was taken from the medical records. The data of CD4 and VL measures included in the analysis was the obtained closer to the date of the first visits to the gynecologist in the study of each patient, the latest CD4 and VL that were in medical records.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were described using the median (interquartile range [IQR]); qualitative variables were described using percentages. Groups were compared using the Pearson χ2 test; when the expected frequencies were less than 5, the Fisher exact test was applied. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify possible factors associated with HR-HPV infection and the presence of abnormal cytology findings (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL] and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL]). The measure of association used was the odds ratio (OR), and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0.

Results

Of the 11,374 patients comprising the PISCIS cohort, 2,519 (22.1%) were women. The population of the present study comprised 479 HIV-1–infected women (19% of the total number of women in PISCIS).

Table 1 shows the main sociodemographic, behavioral, clinical, and history of cervical cancer screening variables. The median age of the participants was 42 years. The main route of transmission of HIV-1 was heterosexual relations (75.2%). Of all participating women, 66 (13.8%) were not in treatment and 413 (86.2%) were in treatment. From those in treatment, 383 (92.7%) were on HAART. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was defined as a regimen composed of at least 3 antiretroviral drugs. The median CD4 T-lymphocyte count was 480 cells/mm3 (IQR, 331–702) and the median viral load was 50 copies/mL (IQR, 40–584). Median time on treatment was 90 months (IQR, 43–132), and the median time from diagnosis of HIV-1 infection documented in the medical records was 119 months (IQR, 59–191)

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Main sociodemographic, behavioral, and clinical characteristics of the study population (n = 479).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.t001

With regard to history of cervical cancer screening, 11% of the number of women infected by HIV-1 had never had a Pap smear, only 60.0% had had one Pap smear within the last 2 years, and 50.6% reported a frequency of annual screening.

Of the 479 patients comprising the study sample, 159 (33.2%) had a positive result by HC2. The prevalence of infection by HR-HPV according to age group is shown in Figure 1; prevalence was higher among younger women and there was an increase after 50 years.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Prevalence curve of HR-HPV infection by age group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.g001

Genotyping was performed on all patients who were HPV (HR) positive by HC2 (n = 159). Genotyping results were obtained for 148 (93.0%) patients, 11 (7%) were other values 0.

Thirty two (21.6%) women with genotyping results had only one type of HPV, 116 (78.4%) women presented multiple infections. Most of them had between 2 and 4 different types of HPV. (60.1%) The distribution of genotypes is shown in Table 2. HPV16 only appeared as a single genotype causing infection in 5 cases (3,4%). In the remaining cases appeared in combination with other genotypes (Table 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Prevalence single and multiple infections of HPV types in HIV positive women and HPV 16 distribution.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.t002

The most prevalent types of HR-HPV and probable HR-HPV, including single and multiple infections, were HPV 16 (23%, n = 34), 53 (20.3%, n = 30), and 52 (16.2%, n = 24) (Figure 2). The most prevalent LR-HPV types were HPV 42 (13.5%), HPV 62 and 84 with 12.8% and 11.5% respectively.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. HR-HPV and provable HR-HPV* types-specific prevalence in HIV-1 positive women.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.g002

The results of the Pap smear were as follows: atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), 7.9% (n = 38); LSIL, 13.8% (n = 66); and HSIL, 3.8% (n = 18). Pap smear revealed that 84.8% and 100% of patients with LSIL and HSIL respectively had HR-HPV. Similarly, 34.2% of patients with ASC-US and 20.2% of patients with a normal cytology result had HR-HPV. The most prevalent HR- HPV and probable HR-HPV types in HSIL, including single and multiple infections, were 16 and 53 (37.5% each) and 52 (31.3%), the most prevalent LR-HPV types in HSIL were Cp6108 (37.5%), HPV 84 and 81 (25% each) and HPV IS36 y 67 (18.8% each)

The main differential characteristics in HIV-1–infected patients according to the result of HC2 and cytology are shown in Table 3. Most women with HR-HPV (82.3%) had their first sexual intercourse at age 18 or earlier, and 61.0% of coinfected women had taken oral contraceptives for more than 10 years. As for CD4 T-lymphocyte count, 45.0% of coinfected women had 200–500 cells/mm3; most women (64.7%) had a viral load of <400 copies/mL and 48.5% had taken antiretroviral treatment for <60 months.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Main differential characteristics of the study population according to the results of HC2 and Pap smear.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.t003

The only factor associated with HR-HPV infection was age: women under 30 years had an OR of having HR-HPV infection that was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.1–5.6) times greater than that of women aged >40 (Table 4). The factors associated with a cytology finding of LSIL or HSIL were CD4 T-lymphocyte count <200 cells/mm3 versus >500 cells/mm3 (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 3.7–19.2), viral load >10,000 copies/mL versus <400 copies/mL (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0–4.4), and use of oral contraceptives (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0–3.9) (Table 5).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Multivariate analysis† of the characteristics associated with high-risk HPV infection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.t004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 5. Multivariate analysis† of the characteristics associated with an abnormal cytology (low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755.t005

Discussion

Our study is the first multicenter study performed in Catalonia to provide data on the prevalence of HR-HPV infection, cervical lesions, and the distribution of high-risk genotypes present in the HIV-1–infected population. We also report data on history of cervical cancer screening.

In HIV-1–infected women, viral persistence is greater and clearance of HPV infection is lower than in immunocompetent women; therefore, the prevalence of HPV infection observed in this population is greater than in the general population, and the risk of progression to high-grade lesions and cancer is also greater [16], [17], [18]. We found prevalence of HR-HPV infection of 33.2%. Although this prevalence is much higher than that observed in general population in Spain (>10%) [19] but is lower than that found in other Spanish studies involving HIV-1–infected women, which show a prevalence >40% [20], [10]. This discrepancy with other studies in HIV women performed in Spain could be explained because the prevalence of HPV varies with age and the median age in our population was higher (42 years) and/or differences in the detection technique.

In the present study, 78.4% of HIV-1–infected women had multiple infections. Irrespective of the technique used to detect HPV DNA, these data are consistent with the results of several studies showing that HIV-1–infected women not only have a greater prevalence of HR-HPV infection, but that they are also infected by a wider variety of types HPV than immunocompetent women [9], [21].

As HIV-1 and HPV are both transmitted through sexual relations and share risk factors for acquisition associated with sexual practices, it is difficult to address the infections separately. The diversity of genotypes and the high prevalence of multiple infections in HIV-1–infected women can be explained more by the effects of HIV-1–induced immunosuppression (modulation of the immune response to HPV, local immunity, and genetic instability) [22] than by risky sexual behavior [23], [24].

Consistent with the results of previous studies in Spain [9], [10], the most prevalent genotypes found in the present study were 16 (23%), 53 (20.3%), and 52 (16.2%).

Infection by HR-HPV is necessary for the development of SIL and ICC [1]. The prevalence of SIL is consistently higher in HIV-1–infected women than in HIV-1–negative women [9], [16].

When we analyzed the distribution of HPV in HSIL, we found a high prevalence of multiple infections, together with the presence of HPV genotypes with lower oncogenic potential. This is probably because in HIV-1–infected women, whose immune systems are weakened, these types of HPV are more likely to evade the immune system and persist in preneoplasic lesions [16], [17], [18].

According Darwich L et al. [25] there is a high prevalence of HPV 16 and 18 in cervical cancers in HIV positive and negative women in Barcelona. In ICC the HPV 18 was significantly more prevalent in HIV-positive women as opposed to HIV-negative women (14% vs 1%). Our study shows a high prevalence of HPV 16 and 53 in HSIL (37.5% each) in HIV positive women, HPV 18 has a prevalence of 12.5%.

Unlike the general population, HIV positive women have a wide range of genotypes in both HSIL and LSIL, probably by the characteristics of sexual behavior and the reactivation of latent infections, which can encourage infection by different HPV types. Taken into account the high prevalence observed of HPV 16 and 18, it is important to consider anti-HPV vaccination as a primary preventive measure in HIV positive women. Studies evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in HIV-infected women are in progress and are certainly needed.

Differences in the capacity to evade the immune system have been observed among different HPV types. It has been shown that the infection by HPV 16 would not depend as much on immune status, whereas infection by other less prevalent types would, as these could be enhanced by suppression of the quality of the immune response [26]. The presence of multiple types of HPV in HIV-1–infected women in our study could be associated with a greater risk of cervical lesions, although we would need to evaluate follow-up data and thus establish the contribution of genotypes with a low oncogenic potential to the development of HSIL and ICC in this group.

Data from the questionnaires and the clinical records show that 75.2% of women participating in the present study became infected by HIV-1 as a result of heterosexual relations. The high level of promiscuity in the study population—most participating women had their first sexual intercourse before age 18 and the proportion of monogamous relationships was low—could explain why the most common variables associated both with HR-HPV infection and with the presence of abnormal cytology findings were not significant in this study.

The prevalence of HPV infection decreases with age [27]. Younger women present a higher prevalence of infection, due to the characteristics of their cervical epithelium and sexual behavior. We observed that the pattern of infection by age in HIV-1–infected women seems to follow a curve very similar to that observed in the general population, although with a higher intensity, namely, younger women had a higher prevalence and risk of infection by HR-HPV (Figure 1). We also observed an increase in the prevalence of infection in the upper age range; this observation has also been made in other populations and may be due to several factors, such as changes in sexual behavior in middle-aged women, high rates of persistence of HPV, or a weakened immune system [28], [29].

The relationship between antiretroviral therapy and the natural history of HPV infection remains controversial. Whereas some studies have not found a clear association between antiretroviral therapy and the reduction in the prevalence of cervical lesions and HPV infection [8], [30], others point to the contrary in women who receive antiretroviral therapy [31], [32]. In the present study, we found a clear association between immune status of HIV-1–infected women and detection of HR-HPV and abnormal cytology findings: 25.6% of women with an abnormal cytology finding had a CD4 T-lymphocyte count <200 cells/mm3 compared with 6.1% of women with a normal cytology result. A similar association was found for detection of HR-HPV and shorter time of treatment. However, these differences only persisted in the multivariate analysis for abnormal cytology findings but not for detection of HR-HPV—due to the existence of confounders such as age or sexual behavior, also these women might have a poorer follow up in general—and significance disappeared in the multivariate analysis. In any case, longitudinal studies would be necessary to ascertain whether immune reconstitution induced by antiretroviral therapy has an effect on the development and progression of cervical lesions in this group, as well as on the incidence and persistence of HR-HPV infection.

The Catalonian Cervical Cancer Screening Protocol recommends that HIV-1–infected women undergo 2 Pap smear separated by an interval of 6 months or 1 Pap smear with colposcopy. In addition, women should have an annual Pap smear, or more frequent Pap smears if their CD4 T-lymphocyte count is <500 cells/mm3 or cytology findings are abnormal. The present study revealed inadequate coverage and frequency of cervical cancer screening in HIV-1–infected women: 60.0% had a Pap smear within the last 2 years and 50.6% reported a frequency of annual screening. The data showed an inadequate screening in HIV positive women. It is necessary to design and to implement specific protocols addressed to vulnerable populations.

Taking into account an estimated incidence of HSIL in the Spanish general population of 10 per 100,000 inhabitants, we would expect to find 0.047 cases of HSIL in 479 women, thus confirming the finding that 18 cases of HSIL in our study sample (n = 479) is much higher than expected in women from the general population who receive regular gynecological care. These findings are consistent with the high incidence of ICC found in HIV-1–infected women in Catalonia [11], [12].

Our study has some limitations. The prevalence of HR-HPV infection was determined based on the sensitivity level set in HC2 for detection of high-risk types, and this limit has been clinically validated in several randomized clinical trials. Higher sensitivity limits or broader-spectrum primers could have revealed more cases of HPV infection. However, these limitations did not affect the objectives of the study: the wide scientific evidence available shows that HR-HPV are the most important types of HPV at an epidemiological level, since they cause more than 99% of cases of ICC in both the general population and the HIV-1–infected population. It has to be taken into account that the cohort included a non-discriminatory sample, according to degree of immunosuppression, evolution of HIV infection and treatment, as a consequence, the population of women with recent infection with HIV was not represented in our study. The sample included only women who had a prolonged history of infection (median, 119 months). In addition, many were taking HAART (92.7%) and the median age was high (42 years). These findings could represent an underestimation of HR-HPV infection and of cervical lesions in this population. On the other hand, the sample was not representative of the total HIV infected population in Catalonia, however, when we contrast our data with the AIDS registry of Catalonia, the clinical epidemiological characteristics did not differ, moreover, the sample came from 9 hospitals that account for 80% of HIV patients in Catalonia.

Finally, we retrieved the data closer to the date of 1st visit to the gynecologist for each patient (at inclusion of patients in the study), which means, the latest CD4 and VL who were in medical records. The time frame was not defined, however, over 80% of records corresponding to the last six months, both CD4 and VL.

In conclusion, we confirmed the high prevalence of HR-HPV infection and cervical lesions in HIV-1–positive patients. HPV16 was the most prevalent type. The most important determinant of HR-HPV infection was age less than 30 years. More abnormal cytology findings were recorded in women with a poorer immune status. Coverage and frequency of cervical cancer screening in HIV-1–infected women in Catalonia is suboptimal, especially considering the high-risk nature of this population. Optimizing prevention of ICC is a priority in these patients.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all members of the HPV-PISCIS Study Group and to those who cooperate to made this study possible: Rafael Muñoz, Miguel Melgares, Joellen Klaustermeier, Mónica Olivera, María López-Diéguez, María Jesús Sánchez, Miriam Redondo, Cristina Tural, Gemma Navarro, Marta Navarro, Luis Force, Isabel García, Nuria Pons, Carmen Oses, Angels Masabeu, Manuel Guadarrama, Ma Antonia Sambeat, Montse Macià. Nursing, Medical and administrative staff from the Internal Medicine and Gynecology Services of the participating hospitals, among others: Ma Gracia Mateo, Ma del Mar Gutierrez, Irene Fernández, Jessica Muñoz, Angels Fontanet, Ma del Carmen Cabeza, Esteve Muntada, Noemí Romero and all the HIV-1–infected women who agreed to participate in the study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VS CA JC. Performed the experiments: A. Torné A. Tarrats CA DM EFM CV JS YC J.M. Marqueta JM IC ML GS EF PD. Analyzed the data: VS AM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JMG BL. Wrote the paper: VS CA. Were part of the writing committee: SDS JC J.M. Miró A. Torné.

Citation: Stuardo V, Agustí C, Godinez JM, Montoliu A, Torné A, Tarrats A, et al. (2012) Human Papillomavirus Infection in HIV-1 Infected Women in Catalonia (Spain): Implications for Prevention of Cervical Cancer. PLoS ONE 7(10): e47755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047755

References

1. Zur hausen H (2002) Papillomavirus and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nature Reviews Cancer 2: 342–350.

2. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, et al. (1999) Human papilloma virus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 189: 12–9.

3. Bosch FX, Muñoz N (2002) The etiology of cervical cancer. Virus Res 89: 183–190.

4. De Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, Geraets DT, Klaustermeier JE, et al. (2010) Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol. Nov 11 (11) 1048–1056.

5. Programa Conjunto de las Naciones Unidas sobre el VIH/SIDA (ONUSIDA 2007).

6. Sistema Integrado de Vigilancia Epidemiológica del SIDA/VIH/ITS en Catalunya (SIVES 2008): Informe bianual. Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament de Salut.

7. GLOBOCAN 2008 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). World Health Organization (WHO).

8. De Sanjosé S, Palefsky J (2002) Cervical and anal HPV infections in HIV-1 positive women and men. Virus Res 89 (2) 201–11.

9. Clifford GM, Gonçalves MA, Franceschi S (2006) HPV and HIV Study Group. Human papillomavirus types among women infected with HIV: a meta-analysis. AIDS 20 (18) 2337–44.

10. Videla S, Darwich L, Cañadas MP, Paredes R, Tarrats A, et al. (2009) Epidemiological data of different human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical specimens of HIV-1-infected women without history of cervical pathology. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 50 (2) 168–75.

11. Mayans MV, Maguire A, Miret M, Casabona J (1999) Disproportionate high incidence of invasive cervical cancer as an AIDS-indicative disease among young women in Catalonia, Spain. Sex Transm Dis 26 (9) 500–3.

12. Galceran J, Marcos-Gragera R, Soler M, Romaguera A, Ameijide A, et al. (2007) Cancer incidence in AIDS patients in Catalonia, Spain. Eur J Cancer 43 (6) 1085–91.

13. Heard I (2009) Prevention of cervical cancer in women with HIV. Curr Opin HIV AIDS 4 (1) 68–73.

14. Franceschi S, Jaffe H (2007) Cervical cancer screening of women living with HIV infection: a must in the era of antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis 45 (4) 510–3.

15. Jaén A, Casabona J, Esteve A, Miró JM, Tural C, et al. (2005) Clinical-epidemiological characteristics and antiretroviral treatment trends in a cohort of HIV infected patients. The PISCIS Project Med Clin (Barc) 124 (14) 525–31.

16. Ahdieh L, Muñoz A, Vlahov D, Trimble CL, Timpson LA, et al. (2000) Cervical neoplasia and repeated positivity of human papillomavirus infection in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive and -seronegative women. Am J Epidemiol 151 (12) 1148–57.

17. Sun XW, Kuhn L, Ellerbrock TV, Chiasson MA, Bush TJ, et al. (1997) Human papillomavirus infection in women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. N Engl J Med 337 (19) 1343–9.

18. Berrébi A, Badiou W, Duclusaud A (2008) Frequency, persistence and recurrence of HPV lesions of the uterine cervix in HIV-1-seropositive women. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36 (5) 521–4.

19. Castellsagué X, Iftner T, Roura E, Vidart JA, Kjaer SK, et al. (2012) CLEOPATRE Spain Study Group. Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus infection of the cervix in Spain: the CLEOPATRE study. J Med Virol 84 (6) 947–56.

20. Grinsztejn B, Veloso VG, Levi JE, Velasque L, Luz PM, et al. (2008) Factors associated with increased prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of HIV-1-infected Brazilian women. Int J Infect Dis 13 (1) 72–80.

21. Temmerman M, Tyndall MW, Kidula N, Claeys P, Muchiri L, et al. (1999) Risk factors for human papillomavirus and cervical precancerous lesions, and the role of concurrent HIV-1 infection. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65 (2) 171–81.

22. Palefsky J (2006) Biology of HPV in HIV infection. Adv Dent Res 19 (1) 99–105.

23. Broker TR, Jin G, Croom-Rivers A, Bragg SM, Richardson M, et al. (2001) Viral latency-the papillomavirus model. Dev Biol (Basel) 106: 443–51.

24. Strickler HD, Burk RD, Fazzari M, Anastos K, Minkoff H, et al. (2005) Natural history and possible reactivation of human papillomavirus in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women. J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (8) 577–86.

25. Darwich L, Cañadas MP, Sirera G, Alameda F, Forcada P, et al. (2011) Human papillomavirus genotype distribution and human papillomavirus 16 and human papillomavirus 18 genomic integration in invasive and in situ cervical carcinoma in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21 (8) 1486–90.

26. Strickler HD, Palefsky JM, Shah KV, Anastos K, Klein RS, et al. (2003) Human papillomavirus type 16 and immune status in human immunodeficiency virus-seropositive women. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (14) 1062–71.

27. Cuschieri KS, Cubie HA, Whitley MW, Seagar AL, Arends MJ, et al. (2004) Multiple high risk HPV infections are common in cervical neoplasia and young women in a cervical screening population. J Clin Pathol 57 (1) 68–72.

28. Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Ferrer E, Bosch FX, et al. (2010) Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: meta-analysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. J Infect Dis 202 (12) 1789–99.

29. De Sanjose S, Cortés X, Méndez C, Puig-Tintore L, Torné A, et al. (2008) Age at sexual initiation and number of sexual partners in the female Spanish population Results from the AFRODITA survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 140 (2) 234–40.

30. Chin-Hong PV, Palefsky JM (2002) Natural history and clinical management of anal human papillomavirus disease in men and women infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis 35 (9) 1127–34.

31. Heard I, Tassie JM, Kazatchkine MD, Orth G (2002) Highly active antiretroviral therapy enhances regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-1-seropositive women. AIDS 16 (13) 1799–802.

32. Minkoff H, Zhong Y, Burk RD, Palefsky JM, Xue X, et al. (2010) Influence of adherent and effective antiretroviral therapy use on human papillomavirus infection and squamous intraepithelial lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-positive women. J Infect Dis 201 (5) 681–90.