Association of Genetic Markers in the BCL-2 Family of Apoptosis-Related Genes with Endometrial Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population

Abstract

Background

In vitro studies have demonstrated the role of the BCL-2 family of genes in endometrial carcinogenesis. The role of genetic variants in BCL-2 genes and their interactions with non-genetic factors in the development of endometrial cancer has not been investigated in epidemiological studies.

Patients and Methods

We examined the relationship between BCL-2 gene family variants and endometrial cancer risk among 1,028 patients and 1,922 age-matched community controls from Shanghai, China. We also investigated possible interactions between genetic variants and established risk factors (demographic, lifestyle and clinical). Individuals were genotyped for 86 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the BCL2, BAX, BAD and BAK1 genes.

Results

Significant associations with endometrial cancer risk were found for 9 SNPs in the BCL2 gene (P trend<0.05 for all). For SNPs rs17759659 and rs7243091 (minor allele for both: G), the associations were independent. The odds ratio was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.04–1.53) for women with AG genotype for the SNP rs17759659 and 1.82 (95% CI: 1.21–2.73) for women with the GG genotype for the SNP rs7243091. No interaction between these two SNPs and established non-genetic risk factors of endometrial cancer was noticed.

Conclusion

Genetic polymorphisms in the BCL2 gene may be associated with the risk of endometrial cancer in Chinese women.

About the Authors:

Tsogzolmaa Dorjgochoo

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Yong-Bing Xiang

Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China

Jirong Long

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Jiajun Shi

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Sandra Deming

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Wang-Hong Xu

Current address: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China

Hui Cai

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Jiarong Cheng

Affiliation: Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China

Qiuyin Cai

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Wei Zheng

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Xiao-Ou Shu

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

Introduction

Apoptosis is a selective process for deleting cells, which is an essential physiological process required for tissue size regulation and morphogenesis [1]. In mammalian cells, apoptosis is induced by two distinct signaling pathways: extrinsic or death receptor and intrinsic or mitochondrial [1], [2]. Proteins of the BCL-2 family have been identified as essential components of the mitochondrial pathway. Members of the BCL-2 family may promote or inhibit apoptosis by synthesizing anti-apoptotic (i.e., BCL2, BCL-Xl) or pro-apoptotic (i.e., BAX, BAK, BAD, BID, BCL-Xs) proteins [1]–[3]. Because of the cyclical pattern of BCL2 expression in the normal endometrium during the menstrual cycle [4], [5], it has been suggested that the BCL2 gene may be the most hormone-dependent member of the BCL-2 family of genes [4], [6].

BCL-2-family proteins play a crucial role in carcinogenesis. The pro-apoptotic BAX, BAK and BAD genes are believed to oppose cell carcinogenesis, while the BCL2 gene can promote cancer cell growth by blocking apoptosis [7], [8]. Over expression of the anti-apoptotic BCL2 gene has been observed in various human cancer tissues, including breast, colon, thyroid and endometrial carcinomas [7]–[10]. The relationship between the BCL-2 family of genes and endometrial cancer came to light mainly through in vitro studies of human tissue samples [6], [11], [12]. Over expression of BCL2 slows down cell growth and very high expression can promote cell death, while lower BCL2 expression can be a sign of inhibition of apoptosis in human breast and endometrial carcinoma tissues [13], [14]. Studies have also shown that BCL2 expression differs by degree of tumor aggressiveness and differentiation [13]–[15], and BCL2 expression has been shown to be very low or absent in higher grade carcinomas compared with lower grade carcinomas [14]. It has been postulated that BCL2 expression may be suppressed during cancer progression [12], [16]. Thus, BCL2 expression could be a valuable predictor of cancer progression and prognosis [17]–[19].

Only a few observational studies have investigated the relation of genetic variants in the BCL-2-gene family, particularly the BCL2 gene, with susceptibility to myeloid leukemia, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, esophageal cancer and prostate cancer [20]–[23]. The results suggest that the BCL-2 family of genes play an important role in cancer development. To date, no genetic association studies have been published on the role of BCL-2-gene family variants in the development of endometrial cancer. We investigated whether genetic variants in the BCL-2-family genes BAD, BAX, BCL2 or BAK1 are associated with endometrial cancer risk. Furthermore, we examined whether variants in these genes modify the effect of established non-genetic risk factors for endometrial cancer by using data from the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Genetics Study (SECGS).

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

The study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of participating institutes, i.e., the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States; and the Shanghai Cancer Institute, Shanghai, China; Shanghai, China. All participants provided written, informed consent.

Study population and data collection

The SECGS uses resources from two studies and includes subjects who participated in the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study (SECS) and control subjects who participated in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study (SBCS, Phase 1). Both the SECS and SBCS are population-based, case-control studies conducted in Shanghai, China between 1996 and 2003, which used nearly identical study protocols. Details of the study designs for these two studies have been described in detail elsewhere [24], [25]. Briefly, 1,208 cases aged 30–69 years newly diagnosed with endometrial cancer were identified through the population-based Shanghai Cancer Registry between January 1997 and December 2003. Cancer diagnoses were confirmed by pathologists. Controls were randomly selected from the general population using the Shanghai Resident Registry and age-frequency matched to cancer cases. The current study includes 1,000 controls from the SECS and additional 922 cancer-free controls from the SBCS.

Study participants were interviewed to obtain detailed information on demographics, lifestyle habits, dietary intakes and supplement use, menstrual and reproductive history, hormone use, disease history, weight history and family history of any cancer. Anthropometric measurements, including weight, height and circumferences of the waist and hips, were taken by the interviewers. Menopause was defined as the cessation of the menstrual period for at least 12 months before the reference date (diagnosis date for cases and interview date for controls), excluding lapses caused by pregnancy, breastfeeding or estrogen hormone use. Body mass index (BMI, weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, kg/m2) and waist-to-hip circumference ratio (WHR) were calculated by using measured anthropometrics as described previously [26], [27].

SNP selection, identification and genotyping

Haplotype-tagging SNPs (tagSNPs) in BCL-2-family genes were selected from the Han Chinese data of the International HapMap Project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) by using the Tagger program [28]. tagSNPs were selected based on the following criteria: 1) genotype call rate ≥95%, 2) minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥0.05, 3) located within a region starting 5 Kb upstream of the transcription start site and ending 5 Kb downstream of the stop codon of each gene and 4) linkage disequilibrium (LD) of r2≥0.9. SNPs with a known or potential function were all included. Genotyping was conducted at the Vanderbilt Microarray Shared Resource. As a quality control (QC) procedure, we included 39 blinded duplicate samples and 12 HapMap DNA samples in the genotyping. The average consistency rate for these samples was 99.6%. The laboratory staff members were blinded to the case-control status and identity of all samples. A total of 86 SNPs in BCl-2-family genes (72 SNPs in BCL2, 4 SNPs in BAD, 5 SNPs in BAX, and 5 SNPs in BAK1) were included in the study, with an average call rate of 99.8%.

Statistical analyses

We used SAS software (version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc.) for the statistical analyses. Demographic, lifestyle and clinical factors were compared between cases and controls by using the χ2 test for categorical variables and a t-test for continuous variables. Calculation of allele frequencies and testing for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) were based on control data. LD between polymorphisms in the BCL2, BAD, BAX, and BAK1 genes was assessed using HaploView, version 4.2 software [29]. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate the associations of the score of established risk factors with endometrial cancer risk and associations of cancer risk with genotypes [i.e., homozygous (AA) for the major allele, heterozygous (Aa) and homozygous (aa) for the minor allele] under additive, dominant and recessive genetic models. Age (continuous) and education (categorical) were adjusted for in all analyses. Additional adjustment for menopausal status, family history of endometrial cancer in first-degree relatives and BMI did not alter the gene-disease associations.

We derived risk scores for established risk factors for endometrial cancer based on previous literature [30]–[34] and their relative importance in our population (Table 1). Menopausal status was highly correlated with age, and smoking and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use were not significantly associated with endometrial cancer risk in this population; thus, these factors were not included in the risk score calculation for established risk factors. As shown in Table 1, we assigned a numeric score (e.g., 0, 1, 2) to each category of the 9 risk factors that were associated with endometrial cancer in our population based on their contribution to total risk; these included age (years, <45 = 0; 45–54 = 1, ≥55 = 2); BMI (<18.5 = 0, 18.5–22.9 = 1, 23.0–27.4 = 2, ≥27.5 = 3); parity (nulliparous = 2, 1 = 1, ≥2 = 0), menstruation span (years: <28.0 = 0, 28.0–31.9 = 1; 32.0–35.1 = 2; ≥35.2 = 3), use of oral contraceptives (OC; never = 1, ever = 0), regular physical activity (never = 1, ever = 0), alcohol consumption (never = 1, ever = 0), history of diabetes or hypertension (no = 0, yes = 1) and history of endometrial or colorectal cancer in first-degree relatives (no = 0, yes = 1). For alcohol consumption and OC use we switched the scores (ever = 0 and never = 1), since these are protective factors for endometrial cancer risk based on the literature [30]–[34]. Menstruation span was calculated based on the difference between ages at menopause and menarche with consideration of pregnancy-related variables (breastfeeding and pregnancy history) and was categorized based on the quartile distribution among controls. BMI was categorized based on the World Health Organization (WHO) BMI cut-off points for Asian populations. For each participant, the sum of scores for all risk factors was calculated. Summary scores ranged from 0 to 14 and were used for the current analysis. We evaluated associations between endometrial cancer risk and scored established risk factors as continuous or categorical variables (based on tertile and median distributions among controls).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Associations of endometrial cancer with established risk factors, the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Genetics Study (SECGS), 1996 to 2003.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060915.t001

In addition, we examined the effect of two independent SNPs on associations between scored established risk factors and endometrial cancer in the stratified analysis by genotype. Tests for trend were performed by entering the categorical variables as continuous parameters in the models. Multiplicative interactions between scored risk factors and genotype subgroups were assessed by comparing the difference of the log likelihoods between models with the main effects and models with both the main effects and the interaction terms. We used the Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test to check the logistic regression models. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and a P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. P-values presented in this paper were not corrected for multiple tests. None of the associations for the 86 SNPs tested would reach statistical significance (5.8*10−4), if the Bonferroni correction were applied.

Results

Table 1 presents associations of the established risk factors with endometrial cancer risk in our study population. Cases were older than controls (mean age: 54.8 vs. 50.8 P<0.01). Associations for most factors presented in the Table 1 were in agreement with prior published literature. The frequency of alcohol consumption was low in our population (3.1% for cases and 4.9% for controls) and was inversely associated with endometrial cancer risk. No apparent association was identified between HRT use or cigarette smoking and cancer risk, but the rate of exposure for these factors was very low.

Associations of non-genetic risk scores with endometrial cancer risk are presented in Table 2. When analyzed as a continuous variable, the OR was 1.65 (95% CI: 1.56–1.75) for each increment in the risk score. When risk scores were categorized into tertiles, women who were in the highest tertile had 8.83-fold (95% CI: 6.44–12.1) higher endometrial cancer risk (P trend <0.01) compared with women who were in the lowest tertile. Risk estimates increased 3.76-fold among women with a risk score ≥7 (median range) compared with women whose risk score was <7.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Associations of risk scores for established risk factors with endometrial cancer risk, the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Genetics Study (SECGS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060915.t002

Nine of the 72 SNPs in the BCL2 gene (rs12961976, rs17759659, rs2170294, rs4941195, rs4987768, rs7230177, rs7231901, rs7243091 and rs9807663) had a statistically significant association with endometrial cancer risk (P<0.05, Table 3), all of which are intronic to BCL2. These 9 SNPs lie in 4 haplotype blocks in the BCL2 genomic region and r2 values were high (>0.8) between seven of these SNPs (data not shown). SNP rs17759659 was in LD (r2 of 0.825) with SNPs rs10460159, rs11663788 and rs6810, which are in predicted miRNA binding sites. Overall, only 2 SNPs, rs17759659 and rs7243091, (r2<0.3) were found to be independent of each other and were both associated with risk of endometrial cancer, even after adjusting for each other in the model. The minor alleles (G) of both rs17759659 and rs7243091 were associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer (for rs17759659, OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04–1.53 for women with the GA genotype; for rs7243091, OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.21–2.73 for women with the GG genotype). None of the SNPs in the BAD, BAX or BAK1 genes were associated with risk.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Association of genetic variants in BCL-2-family genes with endometrial cancer risk among 1,028 cases and 1,922 controls, the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Genetics Study (SECGS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060915.t003

We further evaluated whether SNPs rs7243091 or rs17759659 have a modifying effect on associations between the score of established risk factors and endometrial cancer risk (Table 4). We found no evidence that these two SNPs modify the association of non-genetic risk factors with endometrial cancer (P for interaction  = 0.87 for rs7243091 and 0.62 for rs17759659).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Effects of BCL2 gene variants on associations between risk scores for established risk factors and endometrial cancer risk, the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Genetics Study (SECGS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060915.t004

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate genetic variants in the BCL-2 family of genes together with the quantified effect of established risk factors on endometrial cancer risk. Common genetic variants in the BCL-2-family genes BCL2, BAD, BAX and BAK1 were comprehensively evaluated for associations with endometrial cancer risk. Nine of the 72 SNPs examined in the BCL2 gene, rs12961976, rs17759659, rs2170294, rs4941195, rs4987768, rs7230177, rs7231901, rs7243091 and rs9807663, had a statistically significantly association with endometrial cancer risk and two SNPs, rs17759659 and rs7243091, (r2<0.3) were found to be independent of each other and were both associated with risk of endometrial cancer. The 9 disease-associated SNPs in the intronic region of BCL2 do not appear to alter amino acids, so their relationship to the underlying biology of endometrial cancer remains unclear. We also found that a risk score created based on established endometrial cancer-risk factors [32]–[34], including age, BMI, parity, menstrual span, physical activity, OC use, alcohol consumption, history of diabetes and hypertension and history of endometrial and colorectal cancers in first-degree relatives, was highly predictive of endometrial cancer risk in our study population. However, risk score associations with endometrial cancer were not appreciably modified by SNPs rs7243091 or rs17759659.

Despite the limited observational data on the relationship between BCL-2-gene family polymorphisms and endometrial cancer, our findings on the associations between genetic variants in the BCL2 gene and endometrial cancer risk are consistent with findings from previous human tumor tissue studies, which have clearly demonstrated a role for members of the BCL-2 family of genes, particularly the BCL2 and BAX genes, in endometrial carcinoma [11], [12], [14]–[16]. Most such studies have found low or no expression of BCL2 in endometrial carcinoma [14], [17], [18], although the evidence was not entirely consistent [14]. Laboratory studies have also demonstrated that BCL2 gene expression is related to the degree of aggressiveness and differentiation in endometrial carcinoma [6], [14]. For example, Vaskivuo et al. observed low levels of BCL2 expression in grade I endometrial carcinomas and very low levels or no BCL2 expression in grade II and III endometrial carcinomas, respectively [14], suggesting that the BCL2 g ene is a valuable predictor of disease progression [15].

It has also been suggested that BCL2 may be the most hormone-dependent member of the BCL-2 family of genes and that BCL2 expression patterns in the normal endometrium may vary depending on the menstrual cycle phase or hormonal environment [4], [5]. This cyclical pattern of BCL2 expression decreased or disappeared after administration of levonogestrel, a synthetic progestogen used in some hormonal contraceptives [35], and BCL2 was over expressed in the anti-progestin-treated endometrium [36], demonstrating that exogenous steroid hormones affect BCL2 expression in the human endometrium. However, in our study, we found no modifiable effect of two independent SNPs within the BCL2 gene on associations between non-genetic factors, including hormonal factors, and endometrial cancer risk. These results may be due to the size of our sample not being large enough to detect such interactions or the studied SNPs may not be causally linked to BCL2 gene function. Further studies with a larger sample size, comprehensive evaluation of the genetic variants and, preferably, a direct measurement of estrogen levels are needed to understand the role of BCL2 in endometrial carcinogenesis.

Our study has several strengths, including use of a population-based sample, a relatively large sample size, a genetically homogeneous population, high response rates at recruitment (82.8% for cases and 74.4% [the SECS] and 90.3% [the SBCS] for controls), and histopathology-confirmed case status, all of which help to limit selection and misclassification biases. Detailed information on reproductive and lifestyle factors, medical history, and measured anthropometrics were collected by trained interviewers. No epidemiologic study has yet simultaneously evaluated a large number of polymorphisms in several apoptosis-related genes in the BCL-2 family with endometrial cancer risk. In addition, we also evaluated the potential interactions between established risk factors and genetic markers. Limitations of this study should also be considered when interpreting the results. First, this study evaluated 86 SNPs, and none of the associations would reach statistical significance (5.8*10−4), if the Bonferroni correction were applied, probably due to the small sample size. Second, our study is the first systematic study of genetic associations between BCL-2-family genes and endometrial cancer risk, and the findings need to be replicated in an independent cohort of endometrial cancer patients. Last, the lack of a direct measurement of estrogen hormone levels prevented us from investigating the potential role of BCL-2-family genes in the context of hormone exposure.

In summary, we found that two independent SNPs in the BCL2 gene were associated with endometrial cancer risk among Chinese women. However, we found little evidence that these polymorphisms modify the association of established risk factors with endometrial cancer. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to elucidate the role of gene-environment interactions in endometrial cancer development.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Fan Jin for her contributions to the implementation of the study in Shanghai, Ms. Regina Courtney and Dr. Shawn Levy for their contributions to the genotyping, Ms. Bethanie Rammer and Mrs. Jacqueline Stern for editing and preparing the manuscript, Dr. Xiaoyan Wu for her assistance in data quality checking, and the study participants and research staff of the SECS and the SBCS.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: QC WZ XOS. Analyzed the data: TD JS HC JL XOS. Wrote the paper: TD XOS JS SD YBX WHX JC QC WZ. Enrolled participants: YBX WHX XOS.

Citation: Dorjgochoo T, Xiang Y-B, Long J, Shi J, Deming S, Xu W-H, et al. (2013) Association of Genetic Markers in the BCL-2 Family of Apoptosis-Related Genes with Endometrial Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population. PLoS ONE 8(4): e60915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060915

References

1. Antonsson B, Martinou JC (2000) The Bcl-2 protein family. Exp Cell Res 256: 50–57.

2. Chao DT, Korsmeyer SJ (1998) BCL-2 family: regulators of cell death. Annu Rev Immunol 16: 395–419.

3. Green DR (1998) Apoptosis. Death deceiver. Nature 396: 629–630.

4. Gompel A, Sabourin JC, Martin A, Yaneva H, Audouin J, et al. (1994) Bcl-2 expression in normal endometrium during the menstrual cycle. Am J Pathol 144: 1195–1202.

5. Otsuki Y, Misaki O, Sugimoto O, Ito Y, Tsujimoto Y, et al. (1994) Cyclic bcl-2 gene expression in human uterine endometrium during menstrual cycle. Lancet 344: 28–29.

6. Bozdogan O, Atasoy P, Erekul S, Bozdogan N, Bayram M (2002) Apoptosis-related proteins and steroid hormone receptors in normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic endometrium. Int J Gynecol Pathol 21: 375–382.

7. Bukholm IK, Nesland JM (2000) Protein expression of p53, p21 (WAF1/CIP1), bcl-2, Bax, cyclin D1 and pRb in human colon carcinomas. Virchows Arch 436: 224–228.

8. Linjawi A, Kontogiannea M, Halwani F, Edwardes M, Meterissian S (2004) Prognostic significance of p53, bcl-2, and Bax expression in early breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg 198: 83–90.

9. Pappa G, Lichtenberg M, Iori R, Barillari J, Bartsch H, et al. (2006) Comparison of growth inhibition profiles and mechanisms of apoptosis induction in human colon cancer cell lines by isothiocyanates and indoles from Brassicaceae. Mutat Res 599: 76–87.

10. Soda G, Antonaci A, Bosco D, Nardoni S, Melis M (1999) Expression of bcl-2, c-erbB-2, p53, and p21 (waf1-cip1) protein in thyroid carcinomas. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 18: 363–367.

11. Kokawa K, Shikone T, Otani T, Nishiyama R, Ishii Y, et al. (2001) Apoptosis and the expression of Bax and Bcl-2 in hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma of the uterine endometrium. Hum Reprod 16: 2211–2218.

12. Mozzetti S, Ferrandina G, Marone M, D'Ingiullo F, Fruscella E, et al. (2000) Expression of bcl-2, bax-xL, and bcl-xS in endometrial and cervical tissues. Cancer Detect Prev 24: 536–541.

13. Fernandez Y, Gu B, Martinez A, Torregrosa A, Sierra A (2002) Inhibition of apoptosis in human breast cancer cells: role in tumor progression to the metastatic state. Int J Cancer 101: 317–326.

14. Vaskivuo TE, Stenback F, Tapanainen JS (2002) Apoptosis and apoptosis-related factors Bcl-2, Bax, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and NF-kappaB in human endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Cancer 95: 1463–1471.

15. Geisler JP, Geisler HE, Wiemann MC, Zhou Z, Miller GA, et al. (1998) Lack of bcl-2 persistence: an independent prognostic indicator of poor prognosis in endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 71: 305–307.

16. Niemann TH, Trgovac TL, McGaughy VR, Vaccarello L (1996) bcl-2 expression in endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 63: 318–322.

17. Peiro G, Diebold J, Baretton GB, Kimmig R, Lohrs U (2001) Cellular apoptosis susceptibility gene expression in endometrial carcinoma: correlation with Bcl-2, Bax, and caspase-3 expression and outcome. Int J Gynecol Pathol 20: 359–367.

18. Porichi O, Nikolaidou ME, Apostolaki A, Tserkezoglou A, Arnogiannaki N, et al. (2009) BCL-2, BAX and P53 expression profiles in endometrial carcinoma as studied by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Anticancer Res 29: 3977–3982.

19. Saegusa M, Okayasu I (1997) Bcl-2 is closely correlated with favorable prognostic factors and inversely associated with p53 protein accumulation in endometrial carcinomas: immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction/loss of heterozygosity findings. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 123: 429–434.

20. Chen K, Hu Z, Wang LE, Sturgis EM, El-Naggar AK, et al. (2007) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms at the TP53-binding or responsive promoter regions of BAX and BCL2 genes and risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Carcinogenesis 28: 2008–2012.

21. Hirata H, Hinoda Y, Kikuno N, Suehiro Y, Shahryari V, et al. (2009) Bcl2 -938C/A polymorphism carries increased risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 181: 1907–1912.

22. Jain M, Kumar S, Lal P, Tiwari A, Ghoshal UC, et al. (2007) Role of BCL2 (ala43thr), CCND1 (G870A) and FAS (A-670G) polymorphisms in modulating the risk of developing esophageal cancer. Cancer Detect Prev 31: 225–232.

23. Moon JH, Sohn SK, Lee MH, Jang JH, Kim K, et al. (2010) BCL2 gene polymorphism could predict the treatment outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Leuk Res 34: 166–172.

24. Gao YT, Shu XO, Dai Q, Potter JD, Brinton LA, et al. (2000) Association of menstrual and reproductive factors with breast cancer risk: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Int J Cancer 87: 295–300.

25. Xu WH, Shrubsole MJ, Xiang YB, Cai Q, Zhao GM, et al. (2007) Dietary folate intake, MTHFR genetic polymorphisms, and the risk of endometrial cancer among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16: 281–287.

26. Dorjgochoo T, Shrubsole MJ, Shu XO, Lu W, Ruan Z, et al. (2008) Vitamin supplement use and risk for breast cancer: the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111: 269–278.

27. Xu HL, Xu WH, Cai Q, Feng M, Long J, et al. (2009) Polymorphisms and haplotypes in the caspase-3, caspase-7, and caspase-8 genes and risk for endometrial cancer: a population-based, case-control study in a Chinese population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18: 2114–2122.

28. Cai H, Xiang YB, Qu S, Long J, Cai Q, et al. (2011) Association of genetic polymorphisms in cell-cycle control genes and susceptibility to endometrial cancer among chinese women. Am J Epidemiol 173: 1263–1271.

29. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263–265.

30. Loerbroks A, Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA (2007) Alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and endometrial cancer risk: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Causes Control 18: 551–560.

31. Parazzini F, La VC, D'Avanzo B, Moroni S, Chatenoud L, et al. (1995) Alcohol and endometrial cancer risk: findings from an Italian case-control study. Nutr Cancer 23: 55–62.

32. Lindemann K, Vatten LJ, Ellstrom-Engh M, Eskild A (2008) Body mass, diabetes and smoking, and endometrial cancer risk: a follow-up study. Br J Cancer 98: 1582–1585.

33. Parazzini F, Negri E, La VC, Benzi G, Chiaffarino F, et al. (1998) Role of reproductive factors on the risk of endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer 76: 784–786.

34. Potischman N, Hoover RN, Brinton LA, Siiteri P, Dorgan JF, et al. (1996) Case-control study of endogenous steroid hormones and endometrial cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1127–1135.

35. Maruo T, Laoag-Fernandez JB, Pakarinen P, Murakoshi H, Spitz IM, et al. (2001) Effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on proliferation and apoptosis in the endometrium. Hum Reprod 16: 2103–2018.

36. Critchley HO, Tong S, Cameron ST, Drudy TA, Kelly RW, et al. (1996) Regulation of bcl-2 gene family members in human endometrium by antiprogestin administration in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 115: 389–395.