Limited Impact of Passive Non-Neutralizing Antibody Immunization in Acute SIV Infection on Viremia Control in Rhesus Macaques

Abstract

Background

Antiviral antibodies, especially those with neutralizing activity against the incoming strain, are potentially important immunological effectors to control human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. While neutralizing activity appears to be central in sterile protection against HIV infection, the entity of inhibitory mechanisms via HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-specific antibodies remains elusive. The recent HIV vaccine trial RV144 and studies in nonhuman primate models have indicated controversial protective efficacy of HIV/SIV-specific non-neutralizing binding antibodies (non-NAbs). While reports on HIV-specific non-NAbs have demonstrated virus inhibitory activity in vitro, whether non-NAbs could also alter the pathogenic course of established SIV replication in vivo, likewise via neutralizing antibody (NAb) administration, has been unclear. Here, we performed post-infection passive immunization of SIV-infected rhesus macaques with polyclonal SIV-specific, antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition (ADCVI)-competent non-NAbs.

Methods and Findings

Ten lots of polyclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) were prepared from plasma of ten chronically SIVmac239-infected, NAb-negative rhesus macaques, respectively. Their binding capacity to whole SIVmac239 virions showed a propensity similar to ADCVI activity. A cocktail of three non-NAb lots showing high virion-binding capacity and ADCVI activity was administered to rhesus macaques at day 7 post-SIVmac239 challenge. This resulted in an infection course comparable with control animals, with no significant difference in set point plasma viral loads or immune parameters.

Conclusions

Despite virus-specific suppressive activity of the non-NAbs having been observed in vitro, their passive immunization post-infection did not result in SIV control in vivo. Virion binding and ADCVI activity with lack of virus neutralizing activity were indicated to be insufficient for antibody-triggered non-sterile SIV control. More diverse effector functions or sophisticated localization may be required for non-NAbs to impact HIV/SIV replication in vivo.

About the Authors:

Taku Nakane

Affiliations AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Takushi Nomura

Affiliations AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Shoi Shi

Affiliations AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Midori Nakamura

Affiliations AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Taeko K. Naruse

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Pathogenesis, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Akinori Kimura

Affiliation: Department of Molecular Pathogenesis, Medical Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan

Tetsuro Matano

Contributed equally to this work with: Tetsuro Matano, Hiroyuki Yamamoto

* E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] (HY)

Affiliations AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Hiroyuki Yamamoto

Contributed equally to this work with: Tetsuro Matano, Hiroyuki Yamamoto

* E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] (HY)

Affiliation: AIDS Research Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan

Introduction

Development of a successful vaccine is crucial for global human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) control. A recent clinical trial in Thailand has shown partial efficacy of an HIV vaccine regimen, RV144 [1]. Further analyses have suggested possible contribution of virus-binding antibodies to the protection from HIV infection [2,3]. Thus, understanding of the effect of virus-binding, non-neutralizing antibody (non-NAb) responses on the course of HIV/SIV infection may serve as one step for vaccine development.

In contrast to the constrained emergence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), non-NAbs are commonly induced in both the acute and chronic phase of HIV/SIV infection [4–6]. They are known to exhibit in vitro suppressive effects against virus replication, such as ADCC (antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity) and ADCVI (antibody-dependent cell-mediated virus inhibition) [7–10]. While several reports have suggested inverse correlation between such effector functions and viral loads in HIV-infected individuals [5,6] and vaccinated SIV-infected macaques [11–14], the precise influence of non-NAb responses on viral replication control remains undetermined. Passive immunization studies in nonhuman primate AIDS models have shown partial protection from mucosal virus challenge by mucosal pre-challenge non-NAb infusion, suggesting limited protective efficacy of locally-distributed non-NAb responses [15,16]. In the present study, we focused on the effect of systemic distribution of non-NAbs on established primary viral infection, which is another practical vaccine correlate.

Passive immunization of polyclonal neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), which does not exclude coexistence of non-NAbs, has partially provided protective activity in nonhuman primate AIDS models [17–19]. Additionally, we have reported SIV control in vivo by post-infection administration of polyclonal NAbs, in which enhanced antigen presentation and subsequent augmented T-cell responses likely accounted for the control [20,21]. Since non-NAbs are potentially capable of supporting these suggested mechanisms, the protective activity of non-NAbs by themselves against established primary infection is important to be assessed. Here, we examined the effect of passive non-NAb immunization at day 7 post-challenge on primary SIVmac239 replication in rhesus macaques. Despite the virion-binding and ADCVI activity of non-NAbs having been confirmed in vitro, passive immunization of non-NAbs did not result in control of SIV replication in vivo.

Methods

Ethics Statement

Animal experiments were carried out in National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBP) after approval by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of NIBP in accordance with the guidelines for animal experiments at NIBP and National Institute of Infectious Diseases. To prevent viral transmission, animals were housed in individual cages allowing them to make sight and sound contact with one another, where the temperature was kept at 25 oC with light for 12 hours per day. Animals were fed with apples and commercial monkey diet (Type CMK-2, Clea Japan, Inc.). Blood collection, vaccination, and SIV challenge were performed under ketamine anesthesia. Three of eleven macaques, R10-001, R10-004, and R06-029, were euthanized during the observation period in the SIV challenge experiment of this study. Two of them (R10-004 and R06-029) were euthanized (at 7-10 months) after the minimum observation period required for this study (6 months) because of the limitation of available cage numbers. One macaque R10-001 was euthanized (at 9 months) at the endpoint for euthanasia, which was determined by typical signs of AIDS including reduction in peripheral CD4+ T-cell counts (less than 200 cells/µl), 10% loss of body weight, diarrhea, and general weakness. At euthanasia, animals were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital under ketamine anesthesia, and then, whole blood was collected from left ventricle.

Analysis of Virus-Specific Neutralizing Responses

Heat-inactivated plasma or purified antibodies were prepared in quadruplicate and mixed with 10 TCID50 (50 percent tissue culture infective dose) of SIVmac239 [22]. In each mixture, 5 µl of diluted sample was incubated with 5 µl of virus. After 45 min incubation at room temperature, each 10 µl mixture was added into 5 x 104 HSC-F cells (macaque T cell line) [23] per well in 96-well plates. Day 10 culture supernatants were harvested and progeny virus production was examined by determining the supernatant reverse transcriptase activity to confirm the absence of neutralizing activity at 1:2.

Whole virus ELISA and immunoblotting.

SIV virions used for the antigen were prepared by infecting HSC-F cells with SIVmac239 at MOI 0.01. Day 7 supernatant was collected and virus particles were purified by centrifugation at 35,000 rpm, 75 min on 20% sucrose in a SW41 rotor (Beckman Coulter), followed by 35,000 rpm, 75 min on 20%-60% sucrose in a SW55 rotor (Beckman Coulter) and 35,000 rpm, 75 min on 20% sucrose in a SW41 rotor. Precipitated SIV virions were diluted in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and used to coat 96-Well Assay Plates (Becton Dickinson) at a concentration of 100 ng/ml p27 (0.1 ml per well) by overnight incubation at 4 °C. Wells were washed with PBS and blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS. Purified anti-SIV immunoglobulin G (IgG) serially diluted in PBS (0.1 ml per well) were incubated for 2 hr at 37 °C. Plates were washed with PBS and virion-bound antibodies were detected with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-monkey IgG (H+L) (Bethyl Laboratory) and SureBlue TMB 1-Component Microwell Peroxidase Substrate (KPL). SIV-specific IgG activity in the purified IgG and plasma samples were detected using a Western blotting system for detection of SIVmac251 antigens (ZeptoMetrix) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Samples from animals (R02-006, R04-011, R04-014, and R06-005) with rapid AIDS progression showed lower antibody reactivity.

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated virus inhibition (ADCVI) assay.

HSC-F cells (1 x 105) serving as MHC-mismatched targets were infected with SIVmac239 at MOI 0.001. After adsorption for 6 hr, cells were washed twice with medium and serially-diluted anti-SIV or control antibodies (1.0 or 0.1 mg/ml) were added to the target cells with 4 x 105 effector cells, rhesus peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), at an E:T ratio of 4:1 in round-bottomed 96-well plates. Wells of target cells without antibodies or effector cells were set as negative controls. After 7 days of culture, supernatants were collected and measured for their Gag p27 concentrations by ELISA (ABL). The percentage of virus inhibition deriving from ADCVI was calculated as follows: % inhibition = 100x (1 - [p27p/p27c]); where p27p and p27c are the average p27 concentrations in wells with anti-SIV and control antibodies, respectively. Experiments were performed twice in duplicate.

Antibody preparation.

Ten lots of IgG solutions were prepared from ten chronically SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaques without detectable SIVmac239-specific NAb responses, respectively. IgG was purified from the plasma after heat-inactivation and filtration by Protein G Sepharose 4 Fast Flow (Amersham) and concentrated by Amicon Ultra 4, MW50000 (Millipore) to 30 mg/ml. Purified IgG solutions were confirmed negative for SIVmac239-specific neutralizing activity. Three lots prepared from three macaques (R06-007, R01-009, and R03-005) were mixed to obtain the IgG inoculums for passive non-NAb immunization. Five lots of IgG solutions were also prepared from five chronically SIVmac239-infected rhesus macaques with detectable SIVmac239-specific NAb responses, respectively. Control IgG (CAb) was prepared from pooled plasma of non-infected rhesus macaques.

Animal experiments.

Burmese rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were challenged intravenously with 1,000 TCID50 of SIVmac239. For passive immunization, animals were intravenously administered with 300 mg of anti-SIV non-NAb IgG or control IgG at day 7 post-challenge. The determination of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) haplotypes was based on the family study in combination with the reference strand-mediated conformation analysis (RSCA) of Mamu-A and Mamu-B genes and detection of major Mamu-A and Mamu-B alleles by cloning the reverse transcription (RT)-PCR products as described previously [24–27]. Data on control macaques R10-005, R10-008, and R10-001 have previously been reported [28].

Measurement of virus-specific T-cell responses.

Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were measured by flow-cytometric analysis of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) induction as described previously [29]. PBMCs were cocultured with autologous herpesvirus papio-immortalized B-lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCLs) pulsed with overlapping peptide pools spanning the SIVmac239 Gag, Pol, Vif, Vpx, Vpr, Tat, Rev, Env, and Nef amino acid sequence. Intracellular IFN-γ staining was performed using CytofixCytoperm kit (Becton Dickinson). Fluorescein isothiocianate-conjugated anti-human CD4, Peridinin chlorophyll protein-conjugated anti-human CD8, allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-human CD3 and phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human IFN-γ antibodies (Becton Dickinson) were used. Specific T-cell levels were calculated by subtracting non-specific IFN-γ+ T-cell frequencies from those after SIV-specific stimulation. Specific T-cell levels less than 100 cells per million PBMCs are considered negative.

Sequencing.

Viral RNAs were extracted using High Pure Viral RNA kit (Roche Diagnostics) from macaque plasma obtained at around 1 year after challenge. Fragments of cDNAs encoding SIVmac239 Env were amplified by nested RT-PCR from plasma RNAs and subjected to direct sequencing by using dye terminator chemistry and an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Predominant non-synonymous mutations were determined.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed by Prism software version 4.03 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Comparison of viral loads, peripheral blood CD4+ T-cell counts, peripheral blood central memory CD4+ T-cell frequencies, and the number of non-synonymous mutations in Env-coding regions between non-NAb-infused and control animals was performed by nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test with significance levels set at p < 0.05.

Results

In vitro virion binding and ADCVI activity of SIV-specific non-NAbs

Ten lots of polyclonal IgG were prepared from plasma of ten chronically SIVmac239-infected, NAb-negative rhesus macaques, respectively. SIVmac239-binding capacity was screened by whole virus ELISA using virions purified from culture supernatants of SIVmac239-infected HSC-F cells (a macaque T-cell line) (Figure 1). The measured absorbance was proportionate with Env gp120 and Gag p27 reactivity examined by immunoblotting (Figure 2). Polyclonal IgG lots from three macaques (R06-007, R01-009, and R03-005) with intermediate to high virion-binding capacity, although what percentage of IgGs was SIV-specific are unknown, were pooled and further used as a non-NAb cocktail for passive immunization, whose virion-binding characteristics were also confirmed (Figure 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Binding properties of IgGs to SIV virions.

Polyclonal IgGs purified from macaque plasma were subjected to whole virus ELISA using purified SIVmac239 virions as the antigen. Results on ten IgG lots derived from ten macaques without detectable neutralizing activity (non-NAbs; black lines), five with neutralizing activity (NAbs; red), and a control IgG (CAb; green) are shown in the left panel. Results on the non-NAb cocktail and three non-NAb lots composing the cocktail are in the right. The dotted line represents background absorbance. Time points of plasma sampling are shown in parentheses following the macaque IDs. A representative result, means and SDs of duplicate samples, from two experiments is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Binding properties of IgGs to SIV antigens.

The non-NAb cocktail, ten non-NAb IgG lots derived from ten macaques, and CAb were subjected to immunoblotting (ZeptoMetrix). A representative result from two experiments is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453.g002

To examine the in vitro virus-suppressive activity of the non-NAb cocktail, ADCVI activity was evaluated using PBMCs as effectors and MHC-mismatched macaque HSC-F cells as infected targets (Figure 3). IgG lots with high virion-binding capacity showed high ADCVI activity, whereas those from macaques R04-011 and R06-005 with limited reactivity in ELISA and western blot exhibited low ADCVI activity. These results suggest that ADCVI activity is proportionate with overall virion binding. The non-NAb cocktail exerted more than 97% inhibitory activity even at 0.1 mg/ml IgG concentration. A 1.0 mg/ml IgG concentration approximates an estimated in vivo antibody concentration immediately after passive immunization (300 mg IgG in 300 ml body fluid), implying that the observed ADCVI activity is likely to occur in vivo after passive immunization.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. ADCVI activity of the non-NAb cocktail and non-NAb IgG lots.

The reduction in SIV p27 concentration in the supernatant from SIV-infected cell culture with non-NAbs compared to that without antibodies is shown. A representative result, means of duplicate samples, from two experiments is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453.g003

In Vivo Effect of Non-NAb Passive Immunization in SIV Infection

Having confirmed the in vitro anti-viral property of the non-NAb cocktail, we performed the post-infection passive immunization. Five rhesus macaques were challenged intravenously with SIVmac239 followed by passive immunization with the non-NAb cocktail (300 mg IgG) at day 7 post-challenge. When we previously passively immunized rhesus macaques with polyclonal antibodies having anti-SIV neutralizing activity by this regimen (300 mg IgG i.v. at day 7), enhanced virus uptake by DCs, subsequent augmentation of SIV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses, enhancement of in vitro virus-suppressive activity in CD8+ cells, and set-point viremia control were observed [20,21]. The current passive immunization experiment contrasts this previous report by infusion of polyclonal antibodies with comparable SIV virion-binding capacity and ADCVI activity without anti-SIV neutralizing activity. The moment of passive immunization (day 7) also recapitulates the first time frame to detect anti-HIV/SIV antibodies after infection [30,31]. Six animals consisting of two without passive immunization and four with control IgG infusion at day 7 after SIVmac239 challenge were used as controls.

To examine the abundance of non-NAbs after infusion and de novo virus-specific antibody induction, plasma reactivity against SIV antigens was measured by immunoblotting (Table 1). SIV Env-specific antibodies were detected at week 1.5 post-infection exclusively in the non-NAb-infused animals. High reactivity in plasma in these animals resided up to week 3 post-infection. De novo induction of SIV-specific antibodies was comparably observed in both the non-NAb-infused and control groups from week 5 to week 12 post-infection. Collectively, the passive non-NAb immunization resulted in systemic distribution of SIV Env-specific antibodies around peak infection.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Passive non-NAb immunization in SIV infection.

Upper panel: plasma viral loads after SIVmac239 challenge (SIV RNA copies/ml in plasma) in two unimmunized (green lines), four control IgG-immunized (blue), and five non-NAb-immunized macaques (black). Viral loads were determined as described previously [25]. The lower limit of detection is approximately 4 x 102 copies/ml. MHC-I haplotypes determined in individual animals are shown in parentheses as follows: B, haplotype 90-120-Ib; E, 90-010-Ie; J, 90-088-Ij; P, 89-002-Ip; W, 89-075-Iw. Lower panel: peripheral CD4+ T-cell counts after SIVmac239 challenge. No significant difference in viral loads or CD4+ T-cell counts was observed between non-NAb-immunized and control animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453.g004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 5. SIV antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses.

SIV Gag-, Pol-, Vif-, Vpx/Vpr-, Tat-, Rev-, Nef-, and Env-specific CD8+ T-cell responses were measured by detection of antigen-specific IFN-γ induction using PBMCs at weeks 26-30 post-challenge.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453.g005

macaques regimensa plasma antibody responsesb

wk 1 wk 1.5 wk 3 wk 5 wk 12

R10-002 - - - - + ++++

R10-005 - - - - + ++++

R10-008 CAb - - - ++ ++++

R08-014 CAb - - + ++ ++++

R10-001 CAb - - - + +

R10-006 CAb - - - + ++++

R10-007 non-NAb - +++ ++ ++ ++++

R10-003 non-NAb - ++++ ++ ++ ++++

R10-004 non-NAb - +++ ++ + ++++

R06-006 non-NAb - ++++ ++ + ++++

R06-029 non-NAb - +++ ++ ++ ++++

Table 1. SIV-specific antibody responses in plasma after SIV infection.

CSV

Download CSV

All five macaques infused with the non-NAbs failed to contain set-point viremia, similar to the six control animals (Figure 4). The non-NAb-infused and control groups exhibited comparable peak and set-point viral loads without significant difference. No significant difference in total CD4+ T-cell counts was found throughout the course between these two groups (Figure 4). Peripheral CD95+CD28+ central memory CD4+ T-cell counts at week 12 were also comparable between these two groups (data not shown).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 6. Predominant nonsynonymous env mutations.

Viral cDNAs encoding Env were amplified from plasma RNAs obtained at 7-9 months (R10-001, R10-004, and R06-029) or 12 months (other animals) and subjected to sequencing analysis. Amino acid substitutions are shown. The asterisk (*) represents a deletion and the double asterisk (**) represents coexistence of multiple deletion patterns.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453.g006

Considering our previous study of NAb-triggered SIV control and facilitation of T-cell responses [20,21], we examined SIV antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in the chronic phase (Figure 5). Neither the responses to individual antigens nor the summation presented significant difference. Finally, to assess possible selective pressure on SIV by the passive non-NAb immunization, predominant nonsynonymous env mutations in the early phase (at week 12, data not shown) and in the chronic phase were determined (Figure 6). Analysis at week 12 showed only one or two mutations, which were mostly observed also in the chronic phase. Mutations specific for the non-NAb-infused group, such as signs of ADCVI-induced escape [32], were not detected. A slight increase in predominant mutations in the Env V1-coding region was observed in the non-NAb-infused group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08 by Mann–Whitney U test). Thus, the passive non-NAb immunization at day 7 post-challenge showed no significant impact on SIV replication in vivo.

Discussion

Whether augmentation of ADCVI without virus neutralizing activity may influence SIV replication control in vivo was a major interest in this study. Our results indicate that passive non-NAb immunization does not influence primary SIV replication when administered at early post-infection. In agreement with the limited protective effect observed when non-NAbs were administered locally on mucosa before virus challenge [16], systemic distribution of non-NAbs post-infection did not correlate with suppression of SIV replication, despite antiviral activity of the non-NAbs observed in vitro.

For assessment of antibody binding affinity to antigens on virions, we utilized purified SIV virions instead of recombinant Env proteins [33] as the antigen for ELISA under detergent-free conditions. Virion-binding characteristics of antibodies showed a similar trend with ADCVI activity, as seen in other studies [13]. However, the non-NAb infusion did not result in SIV control in vivo, which consequently proposes the following notions.

First, this study indicates that augmentation of non-NAb-derived virus-suppressive activity does not alter SIV control course once infection is achieved. While previous studies on immunized macaques indicated inverse correlation between ADCC or ADCVI activity at virus challenge and acute plasma viremia [11–14], the degree of non-NAb contribution by itself was not clear since vaccination elicited multiple immune responses. In other reports, intracutaneously infused non-NAbs did not exert protection in neonatal macaques [15] and mucosal non-NAbs showed limited protective activity [16]. In coherence, even massive systemic distribution of non-NAbs at peak infection did not impact viral replication in the present study. Thus, antiviral non-NAb responses do not suffice for counteracting establishment of set-point viremia, although these responses may partially influence viral replication in the chronic phase, as indicated by a previous report showing that CD20 depletion in chronic SIV infection can result in accelerated viremia and disease course [34], similar to rapid progressors [35]. Taken together, our results suggest that non-NAbs may withhold a limited role in impeding virus spread in vivo in HIV/SIV infections, unlike in other chronic viral infection models [36].

Second, this study indicates the requirement of neutralizing activity of antibody for the suppression of primary SIV replication by passive NAb immunization post-infection, as observed in our previous study [20]. The NAb-triggered SIV control has been suggested to be attributed to antibody-mediated virion uptake by DCs and enhanced T-cell priming [21], which can also occur in the non-NAb-infused animals. Thus, the control failure in non-NAb-infused macaques implies that augmentation of antigen presentation alone may be insufficient for primary SIV control and that reduction of infectious virus burden and CD4+ T-cell preservation is important for any immune augmentation [20,37,38].

In conclusion, the post-infection passive non-NAb immunization did not result in primary SIV control in a rhesus macaque AIDS model. Our results suggest that virion binding and ADCVI activity with lack of virus neutralizing activity in the acute phase are insufficient for giving an impact on primary HIV/SIV replication. Further sophistication of local and targeted induction of functional non-NAb responses may be required to impact HIV/SIV replication in vivo.

Acknowledgments

We thank F. Ono, K. Hanari, K. Komatsuzaki, A. Hiyaoka, K. Oto, H. Akari, and Y. Yasutomi for assistance in animal experiments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: T. Nakane TM HY. Performed the experiments: T. Nakane T. Nomura SS MN. Analyzed the data: T. Nakane TM HY. Wrote the manuscript: T. Nakane TM HY. Performed MHC-I typing: TKN AK.

Citation: Nakane T, Nomura T, Shi S, Nakamura M, Naruse TK, Kimura A, et al. (2013) Limited Impact of Passive Non-Neutralizing Antibody Immunization in Acute SIV Infection on Viremia Control in Rhesus Macaques. PLoS ONE 8(9): e73453. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073453

References

1. Rerks-Ngarm S, Pitisuttithum P, Nitayaphan S, Kaewkungwal J, Chiu J et al. (2009) Vaccination with ALVAC and AIDSVAX to prevent HIV-1 infection in Thailand. N Engl J Med 361: 2209–2220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0908492. PubMed: 19843557.

2. Haynes BF, Gilbert PB, McElrath MJ, Zolla-Pazner S, Tomaras GD et al. (2012) Immune-correlates analysis of an HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trial. N Engl J Med 366: 1275–1286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113425. PubMed: 22475592.

3. Rolland M, Edlefsen PT, Larsen BB, Tovanabutra S, Sanders-Buell E et al. (2012) Increased HIV-1 vaccine efficacy against viruses with genetic signatures in Env V2. Nature 490: 417–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11519. PubMed: 22960785.

4. Asmal M, Sun Y, Lane S, Yeh W, Schmidt SD et al. (2011) Antibody-dependent cell-mediated viral inhibition emerges after simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac251 infection of rhesus monkeys coincident with gp140-binding antibodies and is effective against neutralization-resistant viruses. J Virol 85: 5465–5475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00313-11. PubMed: 21450829.

5. Forthal DN, Landucci G, Daar ES (2001) Antibody from patients with acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection inhibits primary strains of HIV type 1 in the presence of natural-killer effector cells. J Virol 75: 6953–6961. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.15.6953-6961.2001. PubMed: 11435575.

6. Forthal DN, Landucci G, Keenan B (2001) Relationship between antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, plasma HIV type 1 RNA, and CD4+ lymphocyte count. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir 17: 553–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/08892220151126661. PubMed: 11350669.

7. Holl V, Hemmerter S, Burrer R, Schmidt S, Bohbot A et al. (2004) Involvement of Fc gamma R I (CD64) in the mechanism of HIV-1 inhibition by polyclonal IgG purified from infected patients in cultured monocyte-derived macrophages. J Immunol 173: 6274-6283. PubMed: 15528366.

8. Holl V, Peressin M, Schmidt S, Decoville T, Zolla-Pazner S et al. (2006) Efficient inhibition of HIV-1 replication in human immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells by purified anti-HIV-1 IgG without induction of maturation. Blood 107: 4466–4474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-08-3490. PubMed: 16469871.

9. Holl V, Peressin M, Decoville T, Schmidt S, Zolla-Pazner S et al. (2006) Nonneutralizing antibodies are able to inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication in macrophages and immature dendritic cells. J Virol 80: 6177–6181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02625-05. PubMed: 16731957.

10. Hessell AJ, Hangartner L, Hunter M, Havenith CEG, Beurskens FJ et al. (2007) Fc receptor but not complement binding is important in antibody protection against HIV. Nature 449: 101–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06106. PubMed: 17805298.

11. Hidajat R, Xiao P, Zhou Q, Venzon D, Summers LE et al. (2008) Correlation of vaccine-elicited systemic and mucosal nonneutralizing antibody activities with reduced acute viremia following intrarectal simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac251 challenge of rhesus macaques. J Virol 83: 791–801. PubMed: 18971271.

12. Florese RH, Demberg T, Xiao P, Kuller L, Larsen K et al. (2009) Contribution of nonneutralizing vaccine-elicited antibody activities to improved protective efficacy in rhesus macaques immunized with Tat/Env compared with multigenic vaccines. J Immunol 182: 3718–3727. doi:https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0803115. PubMed: 19265150.

13. Xiao P, Zhao J, Patterson LJ, Brocca-Cofano E, Venzon D et al. (2010) Multiple vaccine-elicited nonneutralizing antienvelope antibody activities contribute to protective efficacy by reducing both acute and chronic viremia following simian/human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P challenge in rhesus macaques. J Virol 84: 7161–7173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00410-10. PubMed: 20444898.

14. Barouch DH, Liu J, Li H, Maxfield LF, Abbink P et al. (2012) Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. Nature 482: 89–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10766. PubMed: 22217938.

15. Florese RH, van Rompay KKA, Aldrich K, Forthal DN, Landucci G et al. (2006) Evaluation of passively transferred, nonneutralizing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity-mediating IgG in protection of neonatal rhesus macaques against oral SIVmac251 challenge. J Immunol 177: 4028–4036. PubMed: 16951366.

16. Burton DR, Hessell AJ, Keele BF, Klasse PJ, Ketas TA et al. (2011) Limited or no protection by weakly or nonneutralizing antibodies against vaginal SHIV challenge of macaques compared with a strongly neutralizing antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 11181–11186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103012108. PubMed: 21690411.

17. Haigwood NL, Watson A, Sutton WF, McClure J, Lewis A et al. (1996) Passive immune globulin therapy in the SIV/macaque model: early intervention can alter disease profile. Immunol Lett 51: 107–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2478(96)02563-1. PubMed: 8811353.

18. Mascola JR, Lewis MG, Stiegler G, Harris D, VanCott TC et al. (1999) Protection of macaques against pathogenic simian/human immunodeficiency virus 89.6PD by passive transfer of neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 73: 4009–4018. PubMed: 10196297.

19. Nishimura Y, Igarashi T, Haigwood NL, Sadjadpour R, Donau OK et al. (2003) Transfer of neutralizing IgG to macaques 6 h but not 24 h after SHIV infection confers sterilizing protection: implications for HIV-1 vaccine development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 15131–15136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2436476100. PubMed: 14627745.

20. Yamamoto H, Kawada M, Takeda A, Igarashi H, Matano T (2007) Post-infection immunodeficiency virus control by neutralizing antibodies. PLOS ONE 2: e540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000540. PubMed: 17579714.

21. Yamamoto T, Iwamoto N, Yamamoto H, Tsukamoto T, Kuwano T et al. (2009) Polyfunctional CD4+ T-cell induction in neutralizing antibody-triggered control of simian immunodeficiency virus infection. J Virol 83: 5514–5524. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00145-09. PubMed: 19297503.

22. Kestler HW III, Ringler DJ, Mori K, Panicali DL, Sehgal PK et al. (1991) Importance of the nef gene for maintenance of high virus loads and for development of AIDS. Cell 65: 651-662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90097-I. PubMed: 2032289.

23. Akari H, Mori K, Terao K, Otani I, Fukasawa M et al. (1996) In vitro immortalization of old world monkey T lymphocytes with herpesvirus Saimiri: its susceptibility to infection with simian immunodeficiency viruses. Virology 218: 382-388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0207. PubMed: 8610465.

24. Argüello JR, Little AM, Bohan E, Goldman JM, Marsh SG et al. (1998) High resolution HLA class I typing by reference strand mediated conformation analysis (RSCA). Tissue Antigens 52: 57–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.1998.tb03024.x. PubMed: 9714475.

25. Matano T, Kobayashi M, Igarashi H, Takeda A, Nakamura H et al. (2004) Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-based control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication in a preclinical AIDS vaccine trial. J Exp Med 199: 1709–1718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20040432. PubMed: 15210746.

26. Tanaka-Takahashi Y, Yasunami M, Naruse T, Hinohara K, Matano T et al. (2007) Reference strand-mediated conformation analysis-based typing of multiple alleles in the rhesus macaque MHC class I Mamu-A and Mamu-B loci. Electrophoresis 28: 918-924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200600586. PubMed: 17309048.

27. Naruse TK, Chen Z, Yanagida R, Yamashita T, Saito Y et al. (2010) Diversity of MHC class I genes in Burmese-origin rhesus macaques. Immunogenetics 62: 601-611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-010-0462-z. PubMed: 20640416.

28. Nomura T, Yamamoto H, Shiino T, Takahashi N, Nakane T et al. (2012) Association of major histocompatibility complex class I haplotypes with disease progression after simian immunodeficiency virus challenge in Burmese rhesus macaques. J Virol 86: 6481–6490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.07077-11. PubMed: 22491464.

29. Iwamoto N, Tsukamoto T, Kawada M, Takeda A, Yamamoto H et al. (2010) Broadening of CD8+ cell responses in vaccine-based simian immunodeficiency virus controllers. AIDS 24: 2777-2787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283402206. PubMed: 21045637.

30. Tomaras GD, Yates NL, Liu P, Qin L, Fouda GG et al. (2008) Initial B-cell responses to transmitted human immunodeficiency virus type 1: virion-binding immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies followed by plasma anti-gp41 antibodies with ineffective control of initial viremia. J Virol 82: 12449–12463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01708-08. PubMed: 18842730.

31. Schäfer F, Kewenig S, Stolte N, Stahl-Hennig C, Stallmach A et al. (2002) Lack of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) specific IgA response in the intestine of SIV infected rhesus macaques. Gut 50: 608–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.50.5.608. PubMed: 11950804.

32. Chung AW, Isitman G, Navis M, Kramski M, Center RJ et al. (2011) Immune escape from HIV-specific antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 7505–7510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016048108. PubMed: 21502492.

33. Barnett SW, Lu S, Srivastava I, Cherpelis S, Gettie A et al. (2001) The ability of an oligomeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope antigen to elicit neutralizing antibodies against primary HIV-1 isolates is improved following partial deletion of the second hypervariable region. J Virol 75: 5526–5540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.12.5526-5540.2001. PubMed: 11356960.

34. Miller CJ, Genescà M, Abel K, Montefiori D, Forthal D et al. (2007) Antiviral antibodies are necessary for control of simian immunodeficiency virus replication. J Virol 81: 5024–5035. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02444-06. PubMed: 17329327.

35. Hirsch VM, Santra S, Goldstein S, Plishka R, Buckler-White A et al. (2004) Immune failure in the absence of profound CD4+ T-lymphocyte depletion in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rapid progressor macaques. J Virol 78: 275–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.1.275-284.2004. PubMed: 14671109.

36. Bergthaler A, Flatz L, Verschoor A, Hegazy AN, Holdener M et al. (2009) Impaired antibody response causes persistence of prototypic T cell-contained virus. PLOS Biol 7: e1000080. PubMed: 19355789.

37. Haigwood NL, Montefiori DC, Sutton WF, McClure J, Watson AJ et al. (2004) Passive immunotherapy in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques accelerates the development of neutralizing antibodies. J Virol 78: 5983–5995. doi:https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.11.5983-5995.2004. PubMed: 15140996.

38. Ng CT, Jaworski JP, Jayaraman P, Sutton WF, Delio P et al. (2010) Passive neutralizing antibody controls SHIV viremia and enhances B cell responses in infant macaques. Nat Med 16: 1117–1119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2233. PubMed: 20890292.