The Relationship between Salivary Beta-2 Microglobulin and Uremia Intensity in Men with Chronic Renal Failure

Headnote

Received: 22/Jan/2012, Accepted: 3/Sep/2012

Abstract

Objective: This study defines the relationship between salivary beta-2 microglobulin (ß2-M) and intensity of uremia in male patients diagnosed with chronic renal failure (CRF).

Materials and Methods: In total of 42 males were enrolled in a case-control study. There were 21 cases of CRF and 21 control cases. We collected 10cc of saliva plus 5 cc of blood from all patients to determine ß2-M, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine (Cr) levels.

Results: There was a correlation between the level of serum BUN and salivary urea in controls and patients, which was statistically significant for controls (p=0.028).The correlation between serum and salivary Cr was 0.195 in controls (p=0.398) and 0.598 in patients (p=0.006), which was statistically significant in patients. The correlation between serum and saliva was 0.133 (p=0.566) in controls and 0.078 (p=0.737) in patients, which was not statistically significant. The correlation between serum BUN and ß2-M was 0.168 (p=0.469) in the control group and 0.629 (p=0.002) in patients, which was statistically significant in patients. The correlation between serum Cr and ß2-M was 0.110 (p=0.635) in the control group and 0.678 (p=0.001) in patients, which was statistically significant in patients. The correlation between serum BUN and salivary ß2-M was 0.093 (p=0.0690) in controls and 0.152 (p=0.152) in patients, which was not statistically significant. The correlation between serum Cr and salivary ß2-M was 0.072 (p=0.070) in the control group and 0.286 (p=0.209) in patients, which was not statistically significant in either group. Conclusion: The results of the study indicated that salivary ß2-M cannot be used as a noninvasive indicator to detect the severity of renal failure.

Keywords: Chronic Renal Failure, Beta 2-Microglobulin, Uremia, Saliva

Cell Journal(Yakhteh), Vol 14, No 4, Winter 2013, Pages: 276-281

Citation: Vahedi M, Malekzadeh H, Haybar H, Soltanian AR, Abdollahzadeh Sh, YoosefiH, Seyedian M, Yazdanpanah L, Abrotan S, Shapanpour Fooladi M, Ghasemi M. The relationship between salivary beta-2 microglobulin and uremia intensity in men with chronic renal failure. Cell J. 2013; 14(4): 276-281.

Introduction

Kidneys excrete approximately 1.5 to 2.5 l of urine per day. Although the removal of toxic and waste products from the blood remains their major role, the kidneys are also essential for the production of hormones such as vitamin D, erythropoietin, and for the modulation of salt and water. Normal renal function can be maintained until approximately 50% of the nephrons per kidney are destroyed (1). Chronic renal failure (CRF) is the end result of a wide array of pathologic processes that reduce the total number of functioning nephrons to the point where dialysis or transplantation is necessary for survival. Uremic syndrome refers to the final stages of progressive renal insufficiency and results from functional derangements of many organ systems, although the prominence of specific symptoms may vary from patient to patient. Glomerulonephritis has been considered to be a leading cause of CRF, but due to progress in the prevention and treatment of this disease in recent years, diabetic nephropathy and hypertensive nephropathy are now the main causes (2). Two groups of symptoms are present in patients with uremic syndrome: symptoms referable to deranged renal excretory and regulatory function (fluid volume, electrolyte abnormalities, acid-base imbalance, retention of nitrogenous waste, and anemia) and a group of clinical symptoms that affect the cardiovascular, neuromuscular, gastrointestinal, immunologic, hematologic, metabolic, and dermatologic systems (1). The most common symptoms of renal failure include changes in urinary albumin-to-creatinine (Cr) ratio and an increase in the glomerular filtration rate, which leads to oral manifestation and disorders related to impaired renal function. The eruption of teeth may be delayed in children with renal failure (3, 4). In a study conducted in Brazil, 83% of patients onhemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation had oral disease and 87% had dental plaque (5).

Beta-2 microglobulin (ß2-M) is a toxic substance found in the serum and saliva of patients with CRF. Accumulation of this protein may lead to amyloidosis, which is characterized by the progressive deterioration of joints resulting from deposits of amyloid fibers in joint areas as well as skeletal-muscle tissues (2-6). The presence of amyloidosis is seen in patients with 6-10 year history of dialysis (7). ß2-M shows an increase in parallel with the development of CRF, leading to a decrease renal disease, the serum level of ß2-M is between 20-50 mg/l (8). The normal level of this protein in the serum of healthy people is within 0-2.4 mg/l, and in the saliva of healthy people it is within 0-0.38 mg/l (9). Elevations in ß2-M may be seen in disorders such as multiple myeloma, Sjogren syndrome, and some cancers (10). ß2-M control is considered to be an important parameter for the evaluation of patients diagnosed with CRF or who are on hemodialysis. The normal level of BUN is 8-18 mg/dl, of serum Cr (11) it is 0.6-1.2 mg/dl, and of urea in saliva (12) it is 1.66-7.5 Mmol/l.

CRF can give rise to a wide spectrum of oral manifestations, including increased accumulation of plaque, gingivitis, bleeding gums, ammonia breath adore, candidiasis, glossitis, loss of trabeculation, loss of the laminadura, loose teeth, jaw bone demineralization, nonspecific lesions, and delayed tooth eruption. Hemodialysis treatment can decrease the severity of oral manifestations caused by renal failure. Tomas et al. (13) have conducted a study on changes in the salivary composition of patients with renal failure. The results of the study revealed that salivary composition in patients with CRF was conditioned by the stage of renal failure. World wide, the number of patients affected by oral manifestations will increase due to the increased prevalence of renal failure (4, 14).There have been several reports on the changes of salivary flow in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD), but oral and dental aspects of renal disease are not yet clear and more investigations are required (4, 15, 16). The present study attempts to understand the relationship between salivary ß2-M and intensity of uremia in patients with chronic renal disease.

Materials and Methods

There were 42 males enrolled in this case-control study of which 21 were diagnosed with CRF and 21 were assigned to a control group. The research was conducted in the Nephrology Department of Shahid Beheshti Teaching Hospital in Hamedan, Iran. CRF pre-dialysis patients glomerular filtration rate (GFR between 15-90 ml/min) had no other evidence of systemic disease. In addition, there were no drugs affecting the oral mucosa and saliva like medications for psychiatric disorders and blood pressure lowering drugs. The control group wasselected from among healthy volunteer donors who continuously referred to the Blood Transfusion Organization. Both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and body weight. All were nonsmokers. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Study was approved by Hamadan Medical Science University Ethics Committee.

All participants fasted overnight after which nonstimulated saliva samples were collected. The participants refrained from speaking during the saliva collection period. To prevent changes in salivary composition during the 24-hour period, participants were instructed not to eat, drink, or use a toothbrush, toothpaste, or mouthwash for 2 hours before sample collection. Saliva was collected by spitting into a test tube for 5 minutes after participants washed and rinsed their mouths. Saliva (10 cc) and venous samples (5 cc) were collected from research participants and delivered to the laboratory to determine serum and salivary ß2-M, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and Cr levels. The MININEPH HUMAN Kit with an autoanalyzer (Binding Site Co., UK) was used to measure ß2-M levels by the nephrometric method. In this study, the amount of urea and Cr in saliva and blood samples was measured using the Pars Azmun Kit (Iran).

To measure serum ß2-M, samples were diluted 1:40 and then placed in a spectrometer or autoanalyzer for 180 seconds. Obtained results were interpreted with the instrument. To measure salivary ß2-M protein, saliva samples were diluted 1.5 times after which the remainder of the process was performed in the same manner as for the measurement of serum ß2-M levels. GFR was calculated as follows:

...

Patients were divided into four groups: i. GRF ≥ 90 ml/min, ii. GFR between 60-90 ml/min, iii. GFR between 30-60 ml/min and iv. GFR between 15-30 ml/min. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to calculate the correlation between salivary and serum markers. Independent t test compared the mean of each variable. Data were imported to SPSS version 15.

Results

The mean age of patients diagnosed with CRF was 33.81 ± 6.45 years and of healthy people it was 49.48 ± 19.8 years. The mean weight of patients with CRF was 83.09 ± 11.2 kg and of controls, it was 67.29 ± 12.56 a similar age and weight range in both groups. The highest cause of renal failure was diabetes in 12 (57.7%) cases, followed by high blood pressure (28.6%), chronic glomerulonephritis (9.6%), and systemic lupus erythematosus (4.8%).

Table 1 shows the means in both healthy controls and patients of serum and saliva ß2-M, urea, and Cr. Table 2 shows the comparison of these two markers in blood and saliva in both groups. There was a correlation between serum BUN level and salivary urea in both controls and patients which was statistically significant in the control group (p=0.028). The correlation between serum and salivary Cr was 0.195 (p=0.398) in controls and 0.598 (p=0.006) in CRF patients, which was statistically significant for patients. The relationship between serum ß2-M and salivary levels was 0.133 (p=0.566) in the control group and 0.078 (p=0.737) for CRF patients, which was not statistically significant. The correlation between serum BUN and ß2-M was 0.168 (p=0.469) in controls and 0.629 (p=0.002) in patients, which was statistically significant inpatients. The correlation between serum Cr and ß2-M was 0.110 (p=0.635) in the control group and 0.678 (p=0.001) for CRF patients, which was statistically significant. The correlation between serum BUN and salivary ß2-M levels was 0.093 (p=0.0690) in controls and 0.152 (p=0.152) for patients, which was not statistically significant. The correlation between serum Cr and salivary ß2-M was 0.072 (p=0.070) in controls and 0.286 (p=0.209) in patients, which was not statistically significant.

Discussion

In the present study there was no significant difference between salivary ß2-M and urea levels serum, Cr and BUN) in CRF patients. In this study, 12 out of 21 CRF patients were diagnosed with diabetes. These results were consistent with those reported by Proctor et al. (3), Erturul et al. (4), and Afshar et al. (17). The median age in healthy subjects was 49.4 years and in CRF was 33.8 years. The median age in patients with chronic renal disease in a study conducted by Afshar et al. (17) was 51.6 ± 17 years, which was consistent with the current study. The average value of salivary urea concentration was 44.048 Mmol/l in patients, which approximated the results reported by Haag et al. (14). Normal salivary urea levels are within the range of 1.66-7.5 Mmol/l in healthy human subjects as defined by Chung et al. (18). In our study the mean salivary urea was found to be 20.33 among healthy human subjects and was higher than reported by Chung et al. (24). No significant difference was found between the present and a previous study conducted by Borhan Mojabi et al. (19) regarding mean salivary urea (20.33 vs. 14.85 Mmol/l) levels. According to Tomas et al. (25), the mean salivary urea in healthy human subjects was 7.56 Mmol/l and, in patients with progressive chronic kidney disease it was 17.03 Mmol/land in patients with non-progressive chronic kidney disease it was 26.28 Mmol/l.

In the current study, the mean Cr concentration in saliva of healthy human subjects was measured at 0.838 µmol/l, while it was reported as 0.3250 µmol/l in patients with stage I CRF, 0.4333 µmol/l (stage II CRF), 0.5875 µmol/l (stage III CRF), and 1.1625 µmol/l (stage IV CRF). In a study carried out by Tomas et al. (13) in 2008, the salivary Cr level in healthy human subjects was 0.08 µmol/l, in patients with progressive CRF it was 0.211 µmol/l and in non-progressive CRF patients the level was 0.784 µmol/l.

Vesterinen et al. (20) in 2010 found that high levels of urea and Cr in CRF patients led to poor oral health. In the present study, the median level of salivary ß2-M in healthy human subjects was 0.9226 mg/l, and in patients it was 1.25 mg/l (stage I CRF), 0.9333 mg/l (stage II CRF), 2.1875 mg/l (stage III CRF), and 2.3125 mg/l (stage IV CRF). The median serum ß2-M level in controls was 1 mg/l, and inpatients it was 3.4 mg/l (stage I CRF), 3.2333 mg/l (stage II CRF), 6.4875 mg/l (stage III CRF), and 6.6625 mg/l (stage IV CRF). In a study conducted by Michelis et al. (21) the median level of salivary ß2-M in healthy human subjects was 0.9 mg/l and in patients with advanced renal failure it was 1.0 mg/l. The results of the present trial concerning salivary ß2-M agreed with the Michelis et al. (21) study. The results of our study were compatible with results reported by Akalin et al. (22) who studied ß2-M levels in serum and saliva of patients with juvenile periodontitis (JP) and healthy human subjects. Their results showed that the level was higher in serum of patients with JP compared to healthy subjects, but showed no difference in saliva levels. This marker possibly plays a role as a systemic factor in the development of this disease. In another study conducted by Crisp et al. (9), the researchers found that salivary ß2-M in healthy human subjects was between 0-0.38 mg/l. Significant differences between our study and the Crisp et al. study might be the result of differences in laboratory techniques.

In the present study, we used the MININEPH HUMAN Kit and Pars Azmun Kit instead of an immunoassay kit for nephelometric measurements. Crisp et al. (9) reported a median serum ß2-M level in healthy human subjects of 1.2 mg/l and in patients with advanced renal failure the level was 9.5 mg/l. In another study conducted by Regina et al. (23) in 2007, they found that patients who developed CRF had higher serum ß2-M levels, and these levels were elevated in patients on hemodialysis.

In a study conducted by Mehal et al. (24) the predialysis serum ß2-M level was 46.7 ± 3.9 mg/l. However the duration of dialysis had no effect on ß2-M levels. The reason for this marked difference in serum ß2-M levels between our study and the previous one carried out by Mehal et al. (24)was because we did not include hemodialysis patients in our study. In a study conducted by Sapvander et al. (25) the ß2-M concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. The median serum BUN in healthy human subjects was 21.667 mg/dl, in patients with CRF it was 22 results of their study reveal that urinary urea levels in patients with advanced renal failure are in agreement with mean values of those in the present study in patients diagnosed with stages I and II CRF. In a study by Bayraktar et al. (26) the mean serum Cr in the control group was 1.00048 mg/dl and in CRF patients it was 1.6 mg/dl (stage I), 1.4 mg/dl (stage II), 2.037 mg/dl (stage III), and 4.225 mg/dl (stage IV). Serum Cr levels in patients with CRF and acute renal failure treated with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis was 55 and 142 mg/dl respectively which was a significant difference with the control group. By excluding dialysis patients, there was a significant difference between the results of our study and those published by Bayraktar et al. (26). In a study by Tomas et al. (17) the Cr level in the control group was 80.53 ± 13.54 µmol/ land in patients with advanced and early renal failure the levels were 211.32 ± 221.00 and 784 ± 213.35 µmol/l, respectively which agreed with our study. Showing rise in Cr levels in patients with advanced renal failure compared to control group.

Conclusion

There wasno significant relationship between salivary ß2-M and serum urea and Cr levels in this study, therefore salivary ß2-M cannot be used as a non-invasive indicator to detect the intensity of uremia in patients with chronic renal disease. According to the results of this study, it seems logical to detect uremia intensity using serum ß2-M. We suggest that since the salivary ß2-M concentration is affected by a number of factors, including oral hygiene and drug therapy, further studies are strongly recommended. We also recommend to examine salivary ß2-M concentration in ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis.

Acknowledgments

This paper is a part of a thesis by Hossein Malekzadeh. Financial support was provided by Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran. There is no conflict of interest in this article.

References

References

1. Greenberge Ms, Glick M, Ship JA.Burket's oral medicine. 11st ed. Philadelfia: BC Decker; 2008; 202-204.

2. Nash TE, Weller PF. Harrison principle of internal medicine. 15th ed. New York: Macgraw Hill; 2001; 115-119.

3. Proctor R, kumer N, Stein A, Moles D, Porter S. Oral and dental aspects of Chronic renal failure. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(3):199-208.

4. Ertugrul F, Elbek-Cubukçu C, Sabah E, Mir S. The oral health status of children undergoing hemodialysis treatment. Turk J Pediatr. 2003; 45(2): 108-113.

5. Souza CM, Braosi AP, Luczyszyn SM, Casagrande RW, Pecoits-Filho R, Riella MC, et al. Oral health in Brazilian patients with chronic renal disease. Rev Med Chil. 2008; 136(6): 741-746.

6. lameire N, Vanholder R, Desmet R. Uremic toxins and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Suppl. 2001; 78: S292-297.

7. Drueke TB. Beta 2-microglobuline and amyloidosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15 Suppl 1: 17-24.

8. Drüeke TB, Massy ZA. Beta 2-microglobulin. Semin Dial. 2009; 22 (4): 378-380.

9. Crisp AJ, Coughlan RJ, Mackintosh D, Clark B, Panayi GS. Beta 2-microglobulin plasma levels reflect disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1983; 10(6): 954-956.

10. Randoux C, Gillery P, Georges N, Lavaud S, Chanard J. Filtration of native and glycatedbeta 2-microglobulin by charged and neutral dialysis membrane. Kidney Int. 2001; 60(4): 1571-1577.

11. James W, Donald A. Dental management of the medically compromised patient. 7th ed. Minneapolis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008: 401-404.

12. Cardoso EM, Arregger AL, Tumilasci OR, Elbert A, Contreras LN. Assessment of salivary urea as a less invasive alternative to serum determinations. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009; 69(3): 330-334.

13. Tomás I, Marinho JS, Limeres J, Santos MJ, Araújo L, Diz P. Changesin salivary composition in patients with renal failure. Arch Oral Biol. 2008; 53(6): 528-532.

14. Vychytil A, Haag-Weber M. Iron status and iron supplementation in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int Suppl. 1999; 69: S71-78.

15. Kaya M, Cermik TF, Ustün F, Sen S, Berkarda S. Salivary function in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. Ann Nucl Med. 2002; 16(2): 117-120.

16. Saito A, Gejyo F Current clinical aspects of dialysis-related amyloidosis in chronic dialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial. 2006; 10(4): 316-320.

17. Afshar R, Sanavi S, Salimi J. Epidemiology of chronic renal failure in Iran: a four year single-center experience. Saudi J kidney Dis Transpl. 2007; 18 (2): 191-194.

18. Chuang SF, Sung JM, Kuo SC, Huang JJ, Lee SY. Oral and dental manifestation in diabetic and nondiabetic uremic patients receiving hemodialysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99(6): 689-695.

19. Borhan Mojabi K, MosallaiesS, Torkaman M. Oral manifestions and salivary alternation in patients with end stage renal disease. JQUMS. 2006; 10(2): 17-20.

20. Vesterinen M, Ruokonen H, Furuholm J, Honkanen E, Meurman JH. Clinical questionnaire study of oral health care and symptoms in diabetic vs. non-diabetic predialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16(2): 559-563.

21. Michelis R, Sela S, Kristal B. Intravenous iron-gluconate during haemodialysis modifies plasma beta 2-microglobulin properties and levels. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 20(9): 1963-1969.

22. Akalin FA, Bulut S, Yavuzyilmaz E. beta 2-Microglobulin levels in serum and saliva of patients with juvenile periodontitis. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent. 1993; 35(4): 230-234.

23. Michelis R, Sela S, Ben-Zvi I, Nagler RM. Salivary beta 2-macroglobulin analysis in chronic kidney disease and hemodialyzed patients. Blood Purif. 2007; 25(5-6): 505-509.

24. Dixit MP, Cabansag MR, Piscitelli J, Greifer I, Silverstein DM. Serum beta2-microglobulin and immunoglobulin levels in young hemodialysis patients. Pediatr Nephrol. 1999; 13(2): 139-142.

25. van der Geest SA, Markusse HM, Swaak AJ. Beta 2 microglobulin measurements in saliva of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: influence of flow. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993; 52(6): 461-463.

26. Bayraktar G, Kurtulus I, Kazancioglu R, Bayramgurler I, Cintan S, Bural C, et al. Oral health and inflammation in patients with end-stage renal failure. Perit Dial Int. 2009; 29(4): 472-479.