ARTICLE
Received 10 Jul 2013 | Accepted 18 Feb 2014 | Published 17 Mar 2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465
MTSS1 is a metastasis driver in a subset of human melanomas
Kirsten D. Mertz1,*,w, Gaurav Pathria1,*, Christine Wagner1,*, Juha Saarikangas2,w, Andrea Sboner3, Julia Romanov1, Melanie Gschaider1, Florian Lenz4, Friederike Neumann4, Wolfgang Schreiner4, Maria Nemethova5, Alexander Glassmann6,w, Pekka Lappalainen2, Georg Stingl1, J. Victor Small5, Dieter Fink7, Lynda Chin8 & Stephan N. Wagner1,9
In cancers with a highly altered genome, distinct genetic alterations drive subsets rather than the majority of individual tumours. Here we use a sequential search across human tumour samples for transcript outlier data points with associated gene copy number variations that correlate with patients survival to identify genes with pro-invasive functionality. Employing loss and gain of function approaches in vitro and in vivo, we show that one such gene, MTSS1, promotes the ability of melanocytic cells to metastasize and engages actin dynamics via Rho-GTPases and colin in this process. Indeed, high MTSS1 expression denes a subgroup of primary melanomas with unfavourable prognosis. These data underscore the biological, clinical and potential therapeutic implications of molecular subsets within genetically complex cancers.
1 Division of Immunology, Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DIAID), Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
2 Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland. 3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York 10021, USA. 4 Section for Biosimulation and Bioinformatics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria. 5 Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1030 Vienna, Austria. 6 Institute of Anatomy, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany. 7 Institute for Laboratory Animal Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University for Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria. 8 Department of Genomic Medicine and Institute for Applied Cancer Science, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. 9 Center for Molecular Medicine (CeMM), Austrian Academy of Sciences, 1090 Vienna, Austria. * These authors contributed equally to this work. w Present addresses: Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Institute of Pathology,
Liestal, Switzerland (K.D.M.); Institute of Biochemistry, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland (J.S.); Life Science Inkubator GmbH, 53175 Bonn, Germany (A.G.). Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.N.W. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465
The hallmarks of cancer cell biology including metastasis are conferred by genetic or epigenetic modications of the tumour genome1. In some cancers with low mutational
complexity, distinct molecular alterations may persist or may be selected for during the course of tumour progression resulting in their high frequency in a given tumour type. The deduced clinical implications can be enormous as documented by the recent therapeutic progress that often relies on attacking the most frequent dominant genetic driver itself or the induced signalling pathway downstream, for example, in chronic myeloid leukemia2.
On the other hand, clinical, transcriptomic and genetic data36 have documented an extensive molecular and cellular heterogeneity of several other cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma. This molecular diversity may segregate heavily mutagenized cancers57 into different genetic subtypes with distinct cell biology, clinical behaviour and therapeutic response8,9. In melanoma, several diverse genetic driver alterations, including aberrant gene amplications as well as mutations, have been identied so far5,6,912. Specic targeting of some of these alterations led to remarkable therapeutic responses10,13, but is frequently followed by early activation of diverse resistance mechanisms1416, again reecting the high molecular diversity of this tumour. In addition, a signicant proportion of (untreated) melanomas are still left without validated somatic driver alterations. Within heavily mutagenized cancer types, these observations therefore advocate a search for protumorigenic and prometastatic genetic alterations acquired by a subset rather than by the majority of individual tumour samples.
Based on frequency and/or uniform distribution of data, conventional frequentist statistics-based approaches are prone to miss genetic alterations that drive tumour subsets. Instead, we subjected tissue-based transcriptomic data to a mathematical algorithm that specically detects outlier data points and subsequently integrated this information with annotated data on chromosomal copy number gain and patients disease outcome. This computational approach was followed by a genetic in vitro screen for cell migration and invasion, assuming that proinvasive genomic alterations are more likely to promote metastasis, the most important prognostic factor for melanoma patients. This integrated gene expression outlier approach identied genes with documented biological function in melanoma and predicted candidate drivers of the disease. An outlier gene satisfying this selection algorithm encoded MTSS1 (MIM, KIAA0429), a regulator of actin and plasma membrane dynamics. Employing gene knockdown and overexpression approaches, we demonstrate here the ability of MTSS1 to promote tumour growth, migration and metastasis of human melanocytic cells.
ResultsIdentication of MTSS1 by an integrated approach. The integrated gene expression outlier approach (INDEGO) is inspired by basic principles of the computational copy number and expression algorithm (CONEXIC)17 that integrates matched copy number and gene expression data from tumour samples to detect biologically relevant gene expression in cancer. INDEGO is based on the following assumptions: (i) in cancers with a highly altered genome, distinct genomic alterations drive subsets rather than the majority of individual tumours; (ii) abnormal (outlier) gene expression signatures could be associated with the presence of genetic driver alterations17; (iii) recurrent non-random copy number alterations can be indicative of the presence of genetic driver alterations5,7,12 (iv) driver alterations should have a signicant impact on the clinical course of the disease, and(v) the ability to invade the surrounding extracellular matrix
allows cancer cells to enter the invasion-metastasis cascade, the most frequent cause of cancer-associated patient mortality18.We used INDEGO for a sequential score-guided search across human melanoma samples for transcript outlier data points with associated gene copy number variations that are best correlated with patients disease outcome to identify genes that are subsequently screened for functionality in a surrogate assay for cell migration and invasion (Fig. 1).
We dene an outlier data point as an observation outside the interquartile range of its distribution within a given data set. An outlier detector algorithm (for details see Methods) was used to detect these data points in our previously generated cDNA-microarray expression data set (GEO accession no. GSE8401) from primary human melanoma samples19. Here, we focused on data points above the upper quartile of distribution (1,541 outlier probe sets, Fig. 1; Supplementary Data 1) given the loss-of-function design in the following genetic screening assay. This list of outliers was subsequently intersected with a list of genes residing in recurrent copy number gains (GEO accession no. GSE7606) of the same tissue samples20 leading to a list of 107 outliers with copy number gain in a subset of melanoma samples (Fig. 1; Supplementary Data 2). While genes located in a region of genetic copy gain or loss are indistinguishable in copy number,
Gene expression profiling
Gene probe sets analysed in tissue samples of primary melanomas (n=22,283)
Outlier selectionOutlier detector (OD)-based identification of upregulated gene probe sets (n=1,541)
Intergration with copy number data cGH analysis to identify tissue samples containing outlier gene probe sets with copy number gain (n=107)
Clinical significance Wilcoxon testing for expression-survival association in primary melanomas (n=7)
Functional genetic screenGenetic interference to assess proinvasive functionality in melanoma cells (n=6)
Figure 1 | The integrated gene expression outlier approach and functional genetic screen for proinvasive activity. Flowchart depicting the multi-tier selection approach for identication of prognosis-relevant proinvasion candidate genes in cancer subsets.
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 ARTICLE
gene expression patterns permit correlation analyses with a distinct phenotype17. To prioritize genes of potential clinical relevance, we used patients survival data obtained from annotated clinical data (Supplementary Table 1) and, by Wilcoxon rank-sum testing, found transcripts of 7 (EIF3H, PDP1, FZD6, MTSS1, LAMP1, SHC1 and SSR2; Po0.05 for each,
Table 1) of the 107 outliers to be differentially expressed between primary tissues from melanoma patients who subsequently died from the disease and those who did not (Supplementary Table 1). These seven genes were further subjected to a genetic screen in a transwell invasion assay into Matrigel, which simulates extracellular matrix21. RNA interference with six (FDZ6, MTSS1, LAMP1, SHC1, EIF3H and SSR2) of these genes in highly invasive human A375 melanoma cells reduced invasion, with four genes (MTSS1, LAMP1, SHC1 and SSR2) showing a reduction by 450% (Fig. 2a). Two of these genes have an already proposed or documented role in melanoma cell biology with SHC1 acting on RAS signalling22 and LAMP1 being implicated in melanoma metastasis23, thus supporting the potential biological signicance of the applied selection approach. As we were particularly interested in the identication of drivers of the disease and, in contrast to SSR2an endoplasmic reticulum translocon component24, MTSS1s property (MIM, KIAA0429) to regulate actin and plasma membrane dynamics via interaction with actin25,26 provided a potential link to the phenotype in the invasion assay screen, we decided to study the contribution of MTSS1 to melanoma cell biology in more detail.
The probe set 203037_s_at corresponding to MTSS1 showed an outlier prole in four out of 31 (13%) primary human melanoma samples (Fig. 2b, upper panel). From these 31 tumours, array comparative genomic hybridization (cGH) data were available for 25 tumours (80%) comprising three of the four samples with outlier expression. Two of these three samples showed a log2 copy number gain of the corresponding gene locus (8q24.13). When we additionally analysed human melanoma metastases, we observed an outlier prole for this probe set in 7 out of 52 (13%) samples (Fig. 2b, lower panel), suggesting high expression levels of MTSS1 throughout the metastatic cascade at least in a subset of tumours. In addition, a Cox proportional hazards model analysis showed a statistically signicant negative association of MTSS1 transcript levels with survival of primary melanoma patients (P 0.02; HR 3.734, 95% CI: 1.21711.455).
Finally, in a transwell invasion assay with Matrigel, RNA interference with MTSS1 expression through two additional siRNAs signicantly reduced the number of invading human A375 melanoma cells (Fig. 2c).
Microarray expression data were further conrmed by an additional quantitative real-time (q-RT)-PCR-based analysis of MTSS1 transcript levels in an independent cohort of additional
20 human metastatic melanoma samples (Supplementary Fig. 1a) and a panel of 20 different human melanoma cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 1b), where we observed a similar differential gene expression prole. Notably, this expression pattern was also portrayed at the protein level in human melanoma cell lines (Supplementary Fig. 1c).
MTSS1, melanocytic cell migration, invasion and metastasis. We next examined whether MTSS1 enhances the motility of human melanocytic cells by assaying the requirement of MTSS1 for maintaining migration and invasion in cell lines established from human primary melanoma in vitro and the ability of MTSS1 to enhance migration in immortalized human melanocytes in vitro.
As expected from the data of the initial genetic screen (Fig. 2a), we observed that RNA interference with MTSS1 expression attenuated the ability of human A375 melanoma cells to reconstitute the cell monolayer in an in vitro scratch assay (Fig. 3a). Similar results were obtained with human melanoma cell lines WM983A and UACC-257 (Supplementary Fig. 2), which also contain high levels of MTSS1 (Supplementary Fig. 1c). We next examined the motility of human melanoma cell line UACC-257 cells by time-lapse video microscopy upon siRNA-mediated interference with MTSS1 expression (Supplementary Movie 1). These cells exhibited oscillating, disoriented movement as compared with control-treated cells, resulting in a reduced net displacement dened as the distance between the starting and the end points of a cell track (Supplementary Fig. 3).
To further analyse the requirement of MTSS1 for directional cell migration and invasion, we again assayed the highly invasive A375 melanoma cells in a transwell invasion assay for their invasive ability through Matrigel. Here, the signicantly reduced number of invading cells upon interference with MTSS1 expression could be completely rescued by simultaneous transfection of melanoma cells with a wild-type MTSS1, but not an empty-vector cDNA (Fig. 3b; bars r, a and b). Subsequent gain-of-function assays were performed in HMEL cells (PMEL/ hTERT/CDK4(R24C)/p53DD), a TERT-immortalized primary human melanocyte line genetically engineered to ectopically express BRAFV600E and an established cell model to study the contribution of genetic alterations to early stages of melanoma development on a low mutational background11,2729. The BRAFV600E background was chosen because of its high frequency in melanoma and any lack of evidence for a preferential association of MTSS1s copy number gain (cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics; http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/index.do
Web End =http://www.cbioportal.org/ http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/index.do
Web End =public-portal/index.do ) or functionality (Supplementary Fig. 4) with another, that is, activated NRAS background. HMEL cells
Table 1 | Integrated outlier genes with prognosis-associated expression.
Probe ID Gene name (aliases) P value (Wilcoxon rank-sum test)
Function
201592_at EIF3H (eIF3-gamma, eIF3-p40) 0.025 Component of eIF-3 complex; plays a role in translation 203987_at FZD6 (Hfz6, FZ-6) 0.025 Negative regulator of canonical Wnt/b-Catenin; promotes the expression of the non-canonical Wnt signalling members 203037_s_at MTSS1 (MIM, KIAA0429) 0.027 Modulates actin-cytoskeletal machinery through interaction with several proteins
201469_s_at SHC1 (SHCA, p66) 0.029 Encodes three isoforms; two smaller isoforms function as adaptors for
Ras activation downstream of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase activation 201551_s_at LAMP1 (CD107a, LGP120) 0.035 Member of the family of membrane glycoproteins that present carbohydrate ligands to selectins218273_s_at PDP1 (PPM2C, PDH) 0.041 Positively regulates the activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex 200652_at SSR2 (TRAPB, SSR-beta) 0.045 Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane receptor that is involved in protein translocation across the ER membrane
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465
NS***
*
a
***
*****
b
150
Relative mRNA levels
Primary melanomas: outliers (n=4)
Melanoma metastases: outliers (n=7)
150
600
*
Ct.siRNA
si-FDZ6 si-MTSS1 si-LAMP1 si-SHC1 si-EIF3H si-PDP1 si-SSR2
% Cells invaded
Relative MTSS1
mRNA levels
100
400
400
50
0
100
50
0
0
c
Membrane pore Cell
si-MTSS1 no. 2 si-MTSS1 no. 3
800
Ct.siRNA
Relative MTSS1
mRNA levels
200
200
0
Ct.siRNA
600
+
Ct.siRNA
+
+
si-MTSS1 no. 2
***
95 kDa
95 kDa
MTSS1
MTSS1
100 ***
si-MTSS1
no. 2
55 kDa
55 kDa
-Tubulin
-Tubulin
% Cells invaded
+
Ct.siRNA si-MTSS1 no. 3
si-MTSS1
no. 3
50
0
Figure 2 | Functional screen for proinvasion genes. (a) Left, qRT-PCR to determine mRNA levels of the indicated genes 48 h after RNA interference in human A375 melanoma cells. Relative mRNA levels are shown as percent of control-treated cells (Ct.siRNA). Error bars represents.d. calculated from duplicates. Right, invasive potential of human A375 melanoma cells upon RNA interference with expression of the indicated genes as determined in a Matrigel invasion assay. The assay was performed in duplicates. Each bar represents the mean of 12 random microscopic eldss.d. Data were compared with control-treated cells (Ct.siRNA) using the two-tailed Students t-test, *Pr0.05, **Pr0.01, ***Pr0.001, NS: not signicant. (b) MTSS1 transcript levels in human primary and metastatic melanoma samples as obtained from cDNA microarray analysis. Upper panel, primary melanoma (blue, n 31) and
lower panel, metastatic melanoma tissue samples (yellow, n 52) plotted along relative MTSS1 transcript levels. Checkered bars represent tissue
samples with an outlier expression prole. Arrowheads indicate tissues samples with an underlying copy number gain. (c) Left, invasive potential of human A375 melanoma cells analysed 48 h after RNA interference with control (Ct.siRNA) and additional MTSS1 siRNAs. Bars represent means.d. of three replicates. Relative invasion into Matrigel compared by the two-tailed Students t-test, ***Pr0.001. Arrows highlight membrane pores and cells.
Right, immunoblots show MTSS1 knockdown.
expressed low levels of MTSS1 (Supplementary Fig. 5) and, upon stable ectopic expression of MTSS1, showed a signicant increase in the number of migrating cells in a transwell migration assay without induction of cell proliferation (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 6).
As tumour cell migration also requires adhesion to selected extracellular substrates, we also analysed the initial process of cellmatrix interactions, that is, cell spreading30. Using bronectin as a surrogate for extracellular matrix, we performed MTSS1 RNA interference in human A375 and WM983A cells followed by an analysis of their spreading potential31. While control cells showed spreading within 45 min after seeding, MTSS1 interference signicantly compromised cell spreading at the same time-point (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 7). Together, these observations demonstrate a promigratory and proinvasive role of MTSS1 in human melanocytic cells in vitro.
Promigratory and proinvasive activities are both important prerequisites for tumour progression and metastasis in vivo. Since a gain-of-function (gene overexpression) approach would more closely mimic the clinical scenario, we tested the ability of ectopically expressed MTSS1 to drive distal metastasis in an established cell system to study melanoma metastasis in vivo, namely 1205Lu melanoma cells, a cell line that expresses virtually undetectable levels of MTSS1 (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 5) and shows weak distal metastasis from skin tumour sites to the
lung28. As ndings at necropsy may fail to detect small and/or anatomically inconspicuous lesions32, we used luciferase-based, noninvasive bioluminescence imaging-guided detection of metastasis followed by histological evaluation. To this end, we stably introduced rey luciferase 2 into ectopic MTSS1- or empty vector-expressing 1205Lu cells (Fig. 4a). Cells (1.0 106)
were implanted subcutaneously into the ank of athymic nude Foxn1nu mice. Animals were followed up for 910 weeks, a time point at which in our model control tumours developed necrotic cores. At this time, we observed a similar tumour penetrance in both cohorts (n 9 out of 9 in each cohort, mean tumour
volumes.e.m: 0.710.13 103 mm3 (empty vector controls)
versus 0.700.04 103 mm3 (ectopic MTSS1 ), P 0.94, two-
tailed Students t-test). Animals were examined for metastasis by luciferin-based whole-body in vivo imaging33 followed by ex vivo imaging of individual organs representing major metastatic sites of melanoma (lymph nodes and distal organ systems such as lung, liver, and so on). Organs suspicious for the presence of metastasis as indicated by imaging were subsequently subjected to whole-organ histological evaluation for metastasis (Fig. 4b). Consistent with its promigratory and proinvasive activity in vitro, seven of nine animals (78%) bearing ectopic MTSS1-expressing melanomas in the subcutaneous sites developed spontaneous micro- and macrometastasis exclusively to the lung, whereas only three of nine animals (33%) in the control cohort harboured metastatic lesions, again exclusively in the lung.
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 ARTICLE
a b
**
NS
NS pEGFP-N1 (N1)
N1+si-MTSS1 no. 2 Wt-MTSS1 + si-MTSS1 no. 2 I-BARmut + si-MTSS1 no. 2
WH2mut + si-MTSS1 no. 2
0 h
24 h 48 h
no. 3Ct.siRNA
**
100
si-MTSS1
no. 2
% Cells invaded
50
si-MTSS1
0 r a b c d
Empty-vector Ct.siRNA si-MTSS1 no. 2 si-MTSS1 no. 3
** **
80
c d
MTSS1+
*
250
Empty-vector
MTSS1
Number of migrated cells
% Spread cells
20
0
60
40
MTSS1
95 kDa -
55 kDa - -Tubulin
200
150
100
50
0
Figure 3 | MTSS1 promotes melanocytic cell motility. (a) In vitro scratch assay with human A375 melanoma cells 48 h after interference with MTSS1 expression by the indicated set of siRNAs. Images were acquired at 0, 24 and 48 h time points after scratching. Scale bar, 350 mm. (b) Representative experiment to rescue the invasive potential of human A375 melanoma cells into Matrigel by expression of wild-type (wt) and mutated (I-BARmut,
WH2mut) MTSS1 isoforms after RNA interference with MTSS1 expression for 48 h. Relative invasion into Matrigel for 20 h as compared with expression of empty-vector (pEGFP-N1) alone by the two-tailed Students t-test, **Pr0.01, NS: not signicant. Bars correspond to means.d. of triplicate data points.
(c) Left, immunoblotting for MTSS1 in HMEL cells stably expressing ectopic MTSS1 or control empty-vector. Right, migration of empty-vector and ectopic MTSS1-expressing HMEL cells through bronectin-coated culture inserts for 20 h in the presence of PDGF. The assay was performed in triplicate. Bars represent the mean of ve random microscopic eldss.d. Data were compared using the two-tailed Students t-test, **Pr0.01. (d) Cell-spreading assay with human A375 melanoma cells for 45 min on bronectin after 48 h RNA interference with MTSS1 expression as determined by the percentage spread of total cells. Bars represent means.d. from three independent experiments. Data were compared with control-treated cells (Ct.siRNA)using the two-tailed Students t-test, *Pr0.05, **Pr0.01.
Altogether, these in vitro and in vivo complementary gain- and loss-of-function data advocate MTSS1 as a bona de metastasis driver in human melanoma.
MTSS1 and tumour growth. As bona de drivers of melanoma cell migration/invasion and metastasis can also be oncogenic28, we next assayed the requirement of MTSS1 for maintaining the tumorigenic phenotype of established human melanoma cell lines in vitro and the ability of MTSS1 to induce tumour growth of immortalized human melanocytes in vivo.
When using anchorage-independent in vitro growth as a surrogate for a tumorigenic phenotype, RNA interference with MTSS1 expression in human UACC-257 melanoma cells signicantly reduced growth in a 1-week soft agar colony formation assay (Fig. 5a). As ectopic MTSS1 doesnt further increase the a priori high protumorigenic activity of late-stage 1205Lu human melanoma cells (established from lung metastasis) (see Fig. 4b, bottom panel), we utilized HMEL cells to evaluate the tumorigenic capacity of MTSS1 at early stages of melanoma development. Notably, stable ectopic expression of MTSS1 (see Fig. 3c) signicantly promoted the in vivo growth of HMEL xenografts in athymic nude Foxn1nu mice (Fig. 5b).
Altogether, these complementary loss and gain of function data suggest MTSS1 to be required for tumour growth of established
human melanoma cells and to be capable of promoting robust tumorigenicity in immortalized human melanocytic cells.
MTSS1-driven cell motility and colin activity. MTSS1 senses and generates membrane curvature through its N-terminal I-BAR domain (inverse Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs domain, also known as IRSp53/MIM homology domain or I-BAR/IMD) and interacts with actin monomers through its C-terminal WASP homology 2 (WH2) domain26,34,35. Furthermore, studies by the group ofL. M. Machesky demonstrated that MTSS1 mediates activation of Rac via its I-BAR domain36,37. Rac is a Rho-family GTPase that recruits the WiskottAldrich Syndrome Protein (WASP) family member WAVE to the cell membrane, leading to activation of the Arp2/3 complex and the initiation of actin branching to drive the formation of lamellipodial protrusions and cell motility38. Using a transwell invasion assay through Matrigel, we investigated the relative requirement of the MTSS1-I-BAR and the MTSS1-WH2 domains for the invasive ability of human melanoma cells. Based on the previous observation that the reduced invasion of human A375 melanoma cells upon interference with MTSS1 expression could be rescued by transfection with a wild-type MTSS1 cDNA (Fig. 3b, bars r, a and b), we assayed the contribution of these two domains in reconstitution experiments with corresponding cDNAs carrying loss-of-function mutations39. While the
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465
b
Empty-vector
MTSS1+
LN, cervical Liver
Lung
Kidney, Spleen, Heart
a
*
6
MTSS1
Effective signal intensity
(arbitrary units)
8
LN, axillary
4
95 kDa -
Empty-vector
MTSS1
55 kDa -
2
-Tubulin
LN, inguinal
Cells1205Lu + Empty-vector 1205Lu + MTSS1
Tumour penetrance 9/99/9
In vivo metastasis 3/9 (33%)7/9 (78%)
0
Figure 4 | MTSS1 promotes in vivo metastasis. (a) Immunoblotting for MTSS1 in human 1205Lu melanoma cells stably expressing ectopic MTSS1 cDNA or control empty-vector. (b) Left, representative image of luciferase-based in vivo detection of metastasis from subcutaneous tumours of 1205Lu melanoma cells ectopically expressing MTSS1. The bioluminescence signal is shown here at week 9, the intensity of the signal, measured as photon ux, is shown as a color scale. Middle, ex vivo imaging of individual organs representing known frequent metastatic sites of melanoma. Right, representative H&E lung histology obtained by serial sectioning through the whole organ. Scale bar, 125 mm. Bottom, tumour penetrance and in vivo metastasis of empty-vector- and ectopic MTSS1-expressing human 1205Lu melanoma cells. Extreme right, mean metastatic tumour load in animals with empty-vector- versus ectopic
MTSS1-expressing cells (measured as photon ux (photons s 1 cm 2 steradian 1) within the ROI). Error bars represent means.e.m.; *Pr0.05 (two-tailed Students t-test).
95 kDa -
a
****
100
Ct.siRNA
si-MTSS1 no. 1
Optical density
(% of Ct.sRNA treatment)
Ct.siRNA
si-MTSS1 no.1
Ct,siRNA si-MTSS1 no. 1
50
MTSS1
55 kDa -
-Tubulin
0
b
Empty-vector (n=47)
MTSS1+ (n=20)
80
Tumour-free survival
100
40
60
P < 0.0001
15
20
0
10Weeks after injection
0
5
20
25
Figure 5 | MTSS1 exerts protumorigenic activity. (a) Left, immunoblotting for MTSS1 in human UACC-257 melanoma cells after RNA interference with MTSS1 expression through the indicated siRNA. Right, short-term soft agar colony formation to assay anchorage-independent growth via AlamarBlue staining. Bars represent mean optical densitys.d. of three replicates. Data were compared using the two-tailed Students t-test, ****Pr0.0001.
(b) KaplanMeier tumour-free survival analysis for xenograft assays in athymic nude mice subcutaneously injected with empty-vector- or ectopic MTSS1-expressing HMEL cells in Matrigel. Data were compared using the Log-rank test.
actin-binding WH2 mutant showed at least a partial increase of invading melanoma cell numbers, the I-BAR mutant barely rescued cell invasion above levels obtained with an empty vector control (Fig. 3b, bars c and d). These data support an indispensability of the I-BAR domain for the proinvasive activity of MTSS1 in human melanoma cells.
When expressed in melanoma cells, GFP-labelled MTSS1 showed a distinct localization at the cell periphery in addition to the diffuse cytoplasmic distribution previously reported in
NIH3T3 cells35. A signicant fraction of MTSS1 was localized at the front tips of the protruding lamellipodia, but not at the retracting side of the cell, and within lopodial plasma membrane protrusions enriched with Ena/VASP, a protein capping lopodia40 (Fig. 6a), a distribution prole resembling that of actin lament assembly protein colin4042. Unphosphorylated active colin associates with actin laments in cell membrane protrusions where it drives actin dynamics by depolymerizing and severing ADP-bound actin laments to regenerate the pool of
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 ARTICLE
a
b
100
*
***
Number of migrated cells
80
60
40
20
NS
0 Empty-vector MTSS1+
si-Cofilin
Ct.siRNA
c d
GTPyS
MTSS1
RhoA
+
+
+
+ Empty-vector
MTSS1+
+
+
+
+ GDP
17 kDa -
p-Cofilin
Rac-GTP
RhoA-GTP
17 kDa - 17 kDa -
95 kDa -
17 kDa -
17 kDa - 17 kDa - 17 kDa -
Cofilin
Total-Rac Total-Rho
40
100
80 60 40 20
0
100
p-Cofilin/cofilin level
(arbitrary units)
Rac-GTP/Rac levels
(arbitrary units)
100
30
80 60 40 20
0
Rho-GTP/Rho levels
(arbitrary units)
80 60 40 20
0
OD (arbitrary units)
20
10
0 GTPyS GDP
RhoA-GTP RhoA-GTP-
bound MTSS1
Empty-vector
MTSS1
Figure 6 | MTSS1 interacts with Rho-colin signalling pathways. (a) B16 melanoma cell transiently expressing EGFP-MTSS1 (green) together with mCherry-VASP (red). MTSS1 localized in the cytoplasm along with VASP (yellow, overlay of EGFP-MTSS1 and mCherry-VASP), and along the cell periphery of the protruding (white arrow) but not the retracting (yellow arrow) front. Inset, the protruding front of another melanoma cell depicting EGFP-MTSS1 localization in lopodial extensions identied by mCherry-VASP at their tips (cyan arrow). A representative picture is shown from a series of slides. Scale bar, 5 mm. (b) Migration of empty-vector and ectopic MTSS1-expressing HMEL cells through bronectin-coated culture inserts for 20 h after RNA interference with colin expression for 48 h. Bars represent the mean of ve random microscopic elds s.d. from three replicates. Data were compared with control-treated cells (Ct.siRNA) using the two-tailed Students t-test, *Pr0.05, ***Pr0.001, NS: not signicant. (c) Left panel, immunoblotting for phospho(Ser3)-colin and colin levels in empty-vector and ectopic MTSS1-expressing HMEL cells in the presence of bronectin (10 mg ml 1). Middle panel, pull-down fractions from a Rac activity assay immunoblotted for active (Rac-GTP) and total Rac. Right panel, pull-down fractions from a RhoA activity assay immunoblotted for active (Rho-GTP) and total Rho. Bottom panel, corresponding densitometric plots. (d) Upper panel, pull-down fractions from a Rho activity assay with ectopic MTSS1-expressing HMEL cells in the presence of excess GTPgS or GDP and immunoblotted for MTSS1 and RhoA.
Lower panel, densitometric quantication of the immunoblots.
actin monomers for new rounds of assembly at lament barbed ends43. Furthermore, the severing activity of colin is important for generation of the branched actin lament network that drives invasion and metastasis of cancer cells44.
To establish a causal relationship between colin activity and MTSS1-driven migration of human melanocytic cells, we rst assayed whether colin silencing would abolish the enhanced migration observed in HMEL cells ectopically expressing MTSS1. While siRNA-mediated interference with colin expression in empty vector control HMEL cells did not affect the number of migrated cells, HMEL cells stably expressing MTSS1 showed reduction of migrated cells almost to the level observed in control cells (Fig. 6b). Consistently, ectopic expression of MTSS1 in HMEL cells reduced the cellular levels of phospho(Ser3)-colin (Fig. 6c, left panel), a phenomenon also observed in human Lu1205 melanoma cells (Supplementary Fig. 8a). Conversely,
siRNA-mediated interference with MTSS1 expression induced phospho(Ser3)-colin levels in HMEL as well as in human A375 melanoma cells (Supplementary Fig. 8b), thus complementing our observations from gain-of-function assays.
The known ability of active Rac to phosphorylate colin through a sequential activation of p21-activated protein kinase (PAK) and LIM domain kinase (LIMK)45 and the observed indispensability of the Rac-interacting I-BAR domain for MTSS1s pro-invasive ability (Fig. 3b) pointed towards a MTSS1RacColin wiring. We therefore investigated a possible modulation of Rac activity through MTSS1. While ectopic expression of MTSS1 in HMEL cells markedly subdued the levels of p(Ser3)-colin (Fig. 6c, left panel), GTP-bound Rac levels showed only a subtle drop (Fig. 6c, middle panel). Even though this observation does not categorically exclude a functional coherence between Rac activity and phospho-colin
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465
levels, it prompted us to study the contribution of other established signalling pathways. In addition to the RacPAK LIMK axis, the RhoA-Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK)-LIMK signalling cascade regulates colin phosphorylation and activation to diminish cell migration43,46. First, suppression of inactive phospho(Ser3)-colin levels upon pharmacological inhibition of ROCK conrmed an intact RhoA-ROCK-LIMK-colin signalling in human A375 melanoma cells (Supplementary Fig. 8c). More importantly, upon ectopic expression of MTSS1, HMEL cells exhibited lower levels of active GTP-bound Rho (Fig. 6c, right panel), correlating well with the reduced cellular levels of phosphorylated colin. To garner a further mechanistic understanding of the interplay between RhoA and MTSS1, we investigated a potential interaction between the two proteins in HMEL cells stably expressing ectopic MTSS1 and observed in a pulldown for active-RhoA, a co-precipitation of MTSS1 at levels commensurate to that of active-RhoA (Fig. 6d). These results speak for an engagement between RhoA and MTSS1 in human melanocytic cells and further substantiate the functional role of MTSS1 in melanocytic cell motility.
DiscussionMetastatic melanoma is a highly aggressive disease with an eventually fatal outcome. Considering the extensive molecular and cellular heterogeneity of this tumour, we applied in this study a sequential explorative approach specically designed to identify biologically and clinically relevant genetic alterations that drive subsets rather than the majority of tumour samples within a given cancer type. The identication of genes with documented impact on melanoma biology along with potentially proinvasive drivers of the disease demonstrates the strength of the chosen approach as well as its complementarity to previous searches within the majority of tumour sample sets28.
MTSS1 combines protumorigenic and proinvasive activities in melanocytic cells and thus seems to belong to the recently described group of oncogenic metastasis drivers in melanoma28. Consistent with the hypothesis that this kind of biological information can inherently be carried already in the genome of early-stage melanomas28,47,48, we observed an outlier expression pattern of MTSS1 to coincide with the presence of a copy number alteration at 8q24.13 in a subgroup of primary melanoma samples. The 8q24.13 gene locus seems to carry a certain degree of susceptibility to genetic alterations as it has been identied as a papillomavirus integration site in cervical carcinoma49, a translocation site in patients with genetic disorders such as the 22q11.21 deletion syndrome50 and a site of copy number gain in cancers of prostate51, gastroesophageal junction52 and breast53. Initial expressionphenotype association studies showed a downregulated or lost expression of MTSS1 in cancer cells of bladder54,55 and prostate56. These data were subsequently challenged by several other studies that showed a rather preserved and at times even increased expression of MTSS1 in human tumour cell lines from bladder, breast and prostate37 as well as individual tissue samples from cancers of head and neck36, esophagus57, breast58, liver59 and medulloblastomas60. These observations could be suggestive for the presence of a similar (MTSS1-driven) molecular subtype in cancers other than melanoma, a hypothesis further strongly supported by large-scale, integrated cancer genomic data sets that describe MTSS1 copy number gain in at least a subgroup of tumour samples from almost all analysed cancer types (in 34 of 38 studies (cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics; http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/index.do
Web End =http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/ http://www.cbioportal.org/public-portal/index.do
Web End =index.do , as of Oct 2013). While biochemical data provide a profound basis for a proinvasive activity of MTSS1 (refs 25,26,37), there are contrasting observations regarding the protumorigenic
and promigratory functionality of MTSS1 in individual cancer sublines within58 and between individual reports36,37,58. So far, however, rigorous evaluations of MTSS1s requirement for in vivo migration and metastasis of cancer cells have been lacking. Together with our data, these observations encourage a more detailed functional evaluation of MTSS1 in individual cancer cell contexts and underscore the potential value of the integrated gene expression outlier approach for the identication of further molecular subsets in melanoma and other cancer types.
In addition to its direct interaction and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton through its I-BAR domain, another promigra-tory mechanism has most recently been ascribed to MTSS1 in Drosophila, namely orchestration of directional migration through impairment of endocytosis of ligands for receptor tyrosine kinases EGF- and PDGF/VEGF-like-receptors61. There, live-imaging experiments revealed that an absence of MTSS1 is associated with impaired directional migration in response to EGF and PDGF. We share this latter observation in loss-of-function experiments and further support it by gain-of-function experiments in human melanocytic cells proposing MTSS1-driven directional migration as a cross-species conserved mechanism.
Both Rac-PAK-LIMK and RhoA-ROCK-LIMK signalling tracts have been shown to regulate colin activity45,46 and our results propose MTSS1-associated regulation of colin activity to utilize both of these signalling modules. Physical interaction between MTSS1 and Rac has been documented earlier; to the best of our knowledge, however, RhoA-MTSS1 engagement has previously not been reported. While these data are supported by observations from other cell lines where ectopic expression of MTSS1 or its I-BAR domain results in reduction of stress bers35, a hallmark phenotype for RhoA inactivation62, they do not exclude additional indirect Rac and RhoA regulation through MTSS1 by affecting the geometry or lipid distribution of the leading edge plasma membrane through its I-BAR domain26 or by altering the structure of the actin cytoskeleton through its interactions with cortactin or Daam1 formin63,64. It is also interesting to note that in contrast to earlier reports about MTSS1 to activate Rac37, but consistent with Racs dispensability for I-BAR-induced lopodia formation34, we observed a reduction of Rac activity in HMEL cells upon MTSS1 expression. In addition to the use of different cell systems, the contextual role of extracellular cues such as bronectin as used in our study could be a critical determinant of modulation of Rac activity by MTSS1.
The latter observations demand caution to extrapolating a similar functionality of MTSS1 across diverse cancer types. In addition to overexpression, the interplay of MTSS1 with other components of the cytoskeletal machinery to confer cell mobility is subject to a high degree of regulation. This includes (i) the extent of alternative splicing leading to the expression of MTSS1-isoforms composed of different functional domains60, (ii) the degree of expression of, substitution by and/or competition with other BAR domain protein family members and lipid-binding proteins65 that interfere with binding of MTSS1 to its substrates such as Cortactin61,63, (iii) the level of competition with other actin-binding adaptor molecules such as N-WASP for binding to active actin monomers63 and (iv) presumably the expression of MTSS1s substrates in different cellular contexts.
In conclusion, we report a molecular subtype of human melanoma and, consistent with the concept of oncogenic metastasis drivers in early-stage melanoma28, demonstrate a protumorigenic, promigratory and prometastatic role of MTSS1 in human melanocytic cells. The presence of this genetic alteration already in primary melanoma tissues could allow early detection of patients with an unfavourable prognosis presumably due to an increased risk of metastasis. Our data further advocate interference with both Rac-PAK-LIMK and
8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 ARTICLE
RhoA-ROCK-LIMK signalling as one mode of action of MTSS1, which may help to guide the development of an early, precise and pathology-adjusted therapeutic intervention.
Methods
Plasmids. The constructs for retroviral transduction were cloned using the Gateway system (Invitrogen). For generating the gateway entry clone the MTSS1 sequence was amplied from a plasmid DNA construct harbouring murine MTSS1 cDNA (Gene Bank NM_144800), using the following primers, forward: 50-Ggggac aagtttgtacaaaaaagcaggctccgaggctgtgatcgagaagg- 30 and reverse: 50 -Ggggaccactttgtac aagaaagctgggtctaagagaagcgcggtgc- 30. The forward primer was designed to enable N-terminal Strep HA-Tag fusion when using the destination vector pfMIG-gw (kindly provided by F. Grebien, Center for Molecular Medicine, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austria).
Enhanced green uorescent protein (EGFP) fusions of wild-type mouse MTSS1 were generated by cloning the MTSS1 cDNA into the pEGFP-C3 vector (Clontech) using the BsrGI restriction site. MTSS1 mutants, IMDmut (K146A, K149A, K150A) and WH2mut (K746A, K747A), have been generated previously34,35. Transient transfections into human melanoma cells were performed using Lipofectamine (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Antibodies. The following antibodies were used: human MTSS1 (2G9) (dilution, 1:1,000) from Abnova; MTSS1 (P549) (dilution, 1:1,000), phospho(S3)-colin (dilution, 1:1,000), colin (clone D3F9) (dilution, 1:1,000) from Cell Signaling Technology; Rac1 (Clone 102) (dilution, 1:1,000) from BD Pharmingen, Rho (1:1,000) from Thermo Scientic and a-Tubulin (DM1A) (dilution, 1:1,000) from
Calbiochem.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR. Total cellular RNA was extracted using TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturers protocol, and 1 mg per sample was subjected to reverse transcription, using
Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). TaqMan gene expression assays for MTSS1 and Ubiquitin C were ordered from Applied Biosystems (MTSS1: Hs00207341_m1, Hs01036424_m1, UBC: Hs00824723_m1, EIF3H: Hs00186779_m1, PDP1: Hs01081518_s1, SSR2: Hs00162346_m1, Actin: Hs99999903_m1). A StepOne Plus qT-PCR System was used for amplication(2 min 50 C; 10 min 95 C; 40 cycles: 15 s 95 C, 1 min 60 C) and detection. Reverse transcription negative controls were always included. For relative quantication of gene expression, the 2 DDCT method was used.
Analysis of transcript proles. Microarray probe intensity data were previously generated from 83 fresh primary and metastatic human melanoma tissue samples19. Data are accessible through GEO Series accession no. GSE8401. Data were read from Affymetrix CEL les and processed with the Genespring GX11.5 software (Agilent Technologies Inc.). To obtain a reasonable number of data points for individual transcripts, only probe sets showing Z80% p-calls in the primary tumour sample set (n 6,904) were used for further calculation. The outlier
detector algorithm denes an outlier as any observation outside the range:(Q1 k(Q3 Q1), Q3 k(Q3 Q1)) for constant k 1 with Q1 and Q3 as the lower
and upper quartiles, respectively. A tumour subset was conned to at least 7.5% and not more than 20% (36 out of 31) tissue samples. Consequently, we specied candidate outlier probe sets by expression signals outside the previously dened range present in at least 7.5% and not more than 20% tissue samples. As we used a loss-of-function design in the following screening assay, we selected outliers above the upper quartile of distribution.
Array cGH data analysis. Array cGH proles of most transcript-proled human tissue samples (25 out of 31, 80%) are part of a reported series of 101 fresh primary and metastatic human melanoma, melanocytic nevi and normal skin tissue samples20 and are available online at GEO under super-series accession no. GSE7606. Microarray and cGH probe set IDs were mapped with the db2db-tool (http:/ biodbnet.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/db/db2db.php). We set up a list of candidate outliers for each individual tumour sample and intersected this list with a list of genes residing in recurrent copy number gains as dened by a log2 ratio Z0.4 signal amplication event20 from the same tissue sample. Candidate outliers qualied as integrated outliers only, if present in the intersection of at least one tissue sample (that is, at least 16% of samples within a potential tumour subset, for denition of a tumour subset see above). Given the previous selection for upregulated outliers (see above), we focused on copy number gains in this analysis.
Patient groups comparison and survival times analysis. Transcriptomic data were annotated with clinical information including a follow-up ranging from 5147 months (Supplementary Table 1). For these studies already published cGH, gene expression and clinical data were utilized19,20. The corresponding samples were collected from 1992 to 2001 as a part of the diagnostic workup or therapeutic strategy. The research was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Essen and granted an exemption. Informed written patient consent
was obtained for all tissues in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Comparison of patients groups for transcript levels was done individually with each integrated outlier by Wilcoxon testing. Since we analysed upregulated outliers, one-sided testing was performed with a signicance level set to Po0.05. Integrated outliers were subsequently ranked as to
P values to prioritize for further experimental validation. To evaluate the association of expression levels with survival times of primary melanoma patients, the Cox proportional hazards model66 with the pre-specied endpoint (death from disease), the time from rst diagnosis to documented death and censored time values (time from rst diagnosis to last clinical visit) for surviving patients were used. The PHREG procedure of the SAS System V9.2 (SAS Institute Inc.) was used for statistical computations and the signicance level for model results was set to Po0.05.
Cell culture and genetically modied cell lines. All cell lines were maintained in RPMI containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). Ectopic MTSS1-expressing- and empty vector-HMEL cells are immortalized human PMEL/hTERT/CDK4(R24C)/ p53DD/BRAF(V600E) melanocytes11 genetically modied to ectopically express MTSS1 or the corresponding empty vector alone. Ectopic MTSS1-expressing or empty vector 1205Lu cells are human 1205Lu melanoma cells (obtained from the American Type Culture Collection) genetically modied to ectopically express MTSS1 or the corresponding empty vector alone. For retrovirus production, 293-GP cells were transfected with 6 mg of the N-Strep-HA-MTSS1-IRES-GFP/
pfMIG-gw construct (for plasmids, see below) together with 1 mg of pVSV-G using Polyfect transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturers instructions. After 1216 h, the supernatant was replaced by fresh medium and virus production allowed for 24 h. Virus containing supernatant was ltered and used directly for the transduction of human cells. After three passages, cell lines were tested for green uorescent protein (GFP) and transgene expression using ow cytometric analysis and western blotting. An almost pure population (498%)
of transduced cells was obtained by FACS-based sorting of GFP-positive cells.
siRNA transfections. Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) targeting human MTSS1 s18916 (no. 1), 21918 (no. 2), 138403 (no. 3), FDZ6 (s729), SHC1 (s21811), LAMP1 (s8082), EIF3H (s16507), PDP1 (s29328), SSR2 (s13481), colin (s2937) and respective control nontarget siRNA no. 2 (Ct.) and Silencer Negative Control no. 1 siRNAs were purchased from Ambion (Applied Biosystems). Please see Supplementary Table 2 for the corresponding siRNA sequences. Transient siRNA transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instruction.
Western blotting and pulldown assays. Total protein was extracted in Laemmli buffer, fractionated by SDS polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-P PVDF membranes (Millipore) by semidry electro-transblotting (Hoefer Scientic). After blocking with 5% non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad), the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, overnight at 4 C. Depending on the primary antibody used membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat-anti-mouse or goat-anti rabbit antibody (1:40,000; BioRad) for 1 h at 20 C. Membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat-anti-mouse antibody (1:40,000; BioRad) for 1 h at20 C. Protein signal was visualized using the ECL detection system (Pierce) according to the manufacturers instructions. The full blots corresponding to the most important western blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9.
Pulldown of active Rho was performed using Active Rho Pull-Down and Detection Kit (Thermo Scientic) according to the manufacturers instructions. Briey, cells were lysed for 5 min on ice using 25 mM TrisCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% NP-40 and 5% glycerol followed by centrifugation at 16,000 g at 4 C for 15 min. GST-Rhodekin-RBD was bound to Glutathione Resin and incubated with 500 mg protein lysate for 1 h at 4 C with gentle rocking followed by three washing steps to remove unbound proteins. Captured proteins were solubilized in SDS sample buffer and heated to 95 C for 5 min before electrophoresis.
For GTPgS or GDP treatment lysates were incubated with GTPgS at a nal concentration of 0.1 mM or GDP at a nal concentration of 1 mM at 30 C for 15 min with agitation. To terminate the reaction the samples were placed on ice and MgCl2 to a nal concentration of 60 mM was added.
Fluorescence microscopy. Melanoma cells were transiently transfected with EGFP-wtMTSS1 cDNA together with mCherry-VASP cDNA construct. Cells were grown overnight and plated on bronectin-coated glass coverslips. For image acquisition, an Axiovert 200M inverted microscope (Zeiss) was used, equipped with a rear-illuminated CCD camera (Roper, 16 mm px 1) controlled by Meta-
Morph 7.5 software (Molecular Devices).
Anchorage-independent growth. Soft agar colony formation was assessed in triplicates in a uorescence-based 1-week assay. Briey, 96-well plates coated with bottom agarose prepared with 0.5% agarose in RPMI plus 10% FCS. Twenty-four hours after transfection with siRNA, 2 103 cells per well were added in top agar
prepared with 0.4% agarose in RPMI plus 10% FCS and subsequently covered with
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 9
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465
RPMI plus 10% FCS and penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). After 7-day incubation, colonies were stained with AlamarBlue (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers instructions and uorescence read with excitation at 530 nm and emission at 590 nm using a multiwell plate reader.
In vitro scratch assay. siRNA-transfected melanoma cells were allowed to grow to conuence (usually 48 h post transfection). Subsequently, a pipette tip was used to scratch the cell monolayer. The cell monolayer was washed and re-fed with fresh medium plus 10% FCS and thymidine (Sigma-Aldrich). Immediately following scratching (0 h) and after incubation of cells at 37 C for 24, 36 and 48 h, phase-contrast images ( 10 eld) of the scratch were photographed digitally with an
Olympus BH-2 inverted phase contrast microscope ( 4 objective), equipped with
an E-330 digital camera (Olympus).
Invasion and transwell migration assays. Invasion assays were performed 48 h after siRNA transfections using BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chambers with 24-well plate format and 8-mm pore size (BD Biosciences), as per manufacturers instructions. Control inserts without Matrigel were used to account for seeding differences. Cells were added to the upper chamber in serum-free DMEM with thymidine (2 104 cells in 500 ml). The lower chamber contained DMEM con
taining 10% FCS. Following an incubation for 20 h at 37 C at 5% CO2, membranes were xed and stained using the Kwik-Diff Staining kit (Thermo Fisher Scientic) according to the manufacturers instructions followed by counting of cells at the bottom surface. In each experiment, 912 randomly selected elds at a 10 or 20 magnication were counted. For transwell migration assays, cells were serum-starved overnight. Following trypsin treatment, washing in RPMI and incubation at 37 C for 3060 min, 4 103 cells in 500 ml RPMI were plated per
8-mm pore-sized cell culture insert (BD Biosciences) coated with 10 mg ml 1 FN. The lower chamber contained 750 ml RPMI plus 20 ng ml 1 PDGF. Incubation and cell counting were performed as described for the invasion assay.
Cell spreading assay. Forty-eight hours post siRNA treatment, cells were allowed to spread at 37 C for 45 min31. Cells attached to coverslips were stained with Alexa Fluor 488 phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) and visualized using an Axiovert 200M microscope (Zeiss)67. Unspread cells were dened as round phase-bright cells, whereas spread cells were dened as elongated or attened phase-dull cells with extended membrane protrusions and a total diameter more than twice the diameter of the nucleus. In each experiment, at least 3 15 cells were counted.
Time-lapse imaging. Briey, UACC-257 melanoma cells were transfected with Ct. or MTSS1 siRNA no. 3. Additional controls included untreated as well as Lipofectamine-treated UACC-257 cells. Twenty-four hours post transfection, cells were seeded at a density of 3 1042.4 105 cells per cm2 in 24-well plates and cultured
in RPMI plus 10% FCS for 24 h. Thereafter, the cluster plates were transferred to a heated (37 C), gassed (5% CO2) and humidied chamber tted onto an inverted microscope (Leica DM IRE2 HC Fluo) with a motorized cross-stage (Maerzhaeuser). Images of each well were recorded every 10 min over the next 36 h using a
10 objective ( 10/0.22 LMC / 7.8 100 objective, Leica) with a digital
camera (Leica DFC350FX). Recordings were stored with the FW4000 database software (Leica). All image processing was performed using ImageJ software (NIH; http://rsb. 106 info.nih.gov/ij/
Web End =http://rsb. 106 info.nih.gov/ij/ )68. For recording and analysing the cell path, ImageJ plug-in MTrackJ was used (http://www.imagescience.org/meijering/software/mtrackj/
Web End =http://www.imagescience.org/meijering/software/ http://www.imagescience.org/meijering/software/mtrackj/
Web End =mtrackj/ ). Each kind of treatment and cell density was followed in three independent time-lapse movies.
(3H)-Thymidine incorporation. A total of 2,000 cells per well were plated in the 96-well format and cultured for 6 days. On day 6 3H-Thymidine (New England Nuclear) was added at a nal concentration of 2 mCi ml 1. After 20 h incubation the cells were harvested using Tomtec harvester (HVD Life Sciences) and counted using a beta-scintillation counter (HVD Life Sciences).
In vivo tumour assays. All experiments were performed in female, 68 weeks, athymic nude Foxn1nu mice (Harlan-Winkelmann) with the approval and following the guidelines of the Animal Research Committee of the Medical University of Vienna and the Austrian Ministry of Science and Research. For xenograft tumorigenicity studies, 3.0 106 cells (in 200 ml of 7 mg ml 1 Matrigel,
BD #354234) were injected subcutaneously into the anks of mice and tumour growth monitored on a regular basis.
For in vivo imaging of xenograft metastasis studies, we rst generated ectopic MTSS1- and control empty vector 1205Lu melanoma cells stably expressing rey luciferase 2 (FLuc2). The vector pLB-U-FLuc2 was generated by Invitrogen Gateway cloning reaction of pE-FLuc2 (entry vector) and pLB-U-DEST (destination vector) according to the manufacturers protocol (Gateway Clonase II Enzyme Mix, Invitrogen). The entry vector pE-FLuc2 was created by replacing eGFP of pE-eGFP with the NcoI and XbaI FLuc2 fragment of pGL4.10-Basic (Promega). pE-eGFP was generated by cloning the eGFP fragment from pFUGW into pENTR-A1 via BamHI and EcoRI sites. To create pLB-U-DEST, several
subcloning vectors were generated. pFUBW was created by cloning a PCR product of the blasticidin cassette of pLentiDest6 (Invitrogen) into pFUGW, replacing eGFP using BamHI and EcoRI sites. Subsequently, the gateway cassette from pGW2for was excised with NheI and XbaI and cloned upstream of the blasticidin cassette of pFUBW into the NheI site to created pLB-U-DEST. pGW2for was created by cloning a PCR product of the gateway cassette into pBluescript(II)-KS( ) (Stratagene). pLB-U-FLuc2 was introduced into melanoma cells by
retroviral transduction and transduced cells selected against blasticidin. Luciferase activity was conrmed in vitro with the Xenogen IVIS 50 imaging system (Caliper Life Sciences) by the addition of 0.03 mg of D-Luciferin to serially diluted cell numbers. Ectopic MTSS1- and empty vector 1205Lu melanoma cells showed equal cell proliferation before xenografting.
For in vivo imaging, briey, 1.0 106 cells were implanted subcutaneously into
the ank of mice and bioluminescent imaging was performed once a week 10 min after i.p. injection of 100 ml D-Luciferin (15 mg ml 1 in PBS) using the Xenogen
IVIS 50 in vivo imaging system33. Animals were anaesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (80 mg per kg) and xylazine (10 mg per kg) and were placed in the supine position. At the end of the experiment, imaging was performed by injection of 200 ml of D-Luciferin and removal of the primary tumour to minimize metastasis-unrelated signals. Binning was set to high sensitivity (HS(8)), eld of view to 15 15 cm and exposure time to 5 min. Thereafter, organs were excised
from each mouse and individually subjected to ex vivo imaging. Analysis was performed using LivingImage software (Caliper) by measurement of photon ux (measured in photons s 1 cm 2steradian 1) with a region of interest (ROI)
drawn around bioluminescence signals. For lung metastasis, an ROI was used encompassing the thorax of the mouse. For determination of the fold increase above background, average background measurements were obtained using the same ROI on a corresponding region from control mice.
For histological conrmation of detected bioluminescence signals, individual organs were collected immediately after ex vivo imaging in formalin and embedded in parafn. Serial sections of 5 mm in thickness were taken every 50 mm through the whole organ and stained with hematoxilin & eosin (Merck).
Statistical methods. Statistical signicance between two groups was assessed by the two-tailed Students t-test. GraphPad Prism 5 software (Graphpad) was used for to perform all statistical calculations as well as to generate KaplanMeier curves for in vivo experiments and to calculate the respective Log-rank testing.
References
1. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646674 (2011).
2. Jabbour, E. & Kantarjian, H. Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2012 update on diagnosis, monitoring, and management. Am. J. Hematol. 87, 10371045 (2012).
3. Beroukhim, R. et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463, 899905 (2010).
4. Lin, W. M. et al. Modeling genomic diversity and tumor dependency in malignant melanoma. Cancer Res. 68, 664673 (2008).
5. Berger, M. F. et al. Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations. Nature 485, 502506 (2012).
6. Hodis, E. et al. A landscape of driver mutations in melanoma. Cell 150, 251263 (2012).
7. Pleasance, E. D. et al. A comprehensive catalogue of somatic mutations from a human cancer genome. Nature 463, 191196 (2010).
8. Moran, C. Importance of molecular features of non-small cell lung cancer for choice of treatment. Am. J. Pathol. 178, 19401948 (2011).
9. Vidwans, S. J. et al. A melanoma molecular disease model. PLoS One 6, e18257 (2011).
10. Hodi, F. S. et al. Major response to imatinib mesylate in KIT-mutated melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 20462051 (2008).
11. Garraway, L. A. et al. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplied in malignant melanoma. Nature 436, 117122 (2005).
12. Curtin, J. A. et al. Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. New Engl.J. Med. 353, 21352147 (2005).13. Flaherty, K. T. et al. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. New Engl. J. Med. 363, 809819 (2010).
14. Wagle, N. et al. Dissecting therapeutic resistance to RAF inhibition in melanoma by tumor genomic proling. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 30853096 (2011).
15. Shi, H. et al. Melanoma whole-exome sequencing identies (V600E)B-RAF amplication-mediated acquired B-RAF inhibitor resistance. Nat. Commun. 3, 724 (2012).
16. Solit, D. B. & Rosen, N. Resistance to BRAF inhibition in melanomas. New Engl. J. Med. 364, 772774 (2011).
17. Akavia, U. D. et al. An integrated approach to uncover drivers of cancer. Cell 143, 10051017 (2010).
18. Valastyan, S. & Weinberg, R. A. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell 147, 275292 (2011).
10 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 ARTICLE
19. Xu, L. et al. Gene expression changes in an animal melanoma model correlate with aggressiveness of human melanoma metastases. Mol. Cancer Res. 6, 760 769 (2008).
20. Kabbarah, O. et al. Integrative genome comparison of primary and metastatic melanomas. PLoS One 5, e10770 (2010).
21. Kozlowski, J. M., Hart, I. R., Fidler, I. J. & Hanna, N. A human melanoma line heterogeneous with respect to metastatic capacity in athymic nude mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 72, 913917 (1984).
22. Liu, B. A. et al. SRC Homology 2 Domain Binding Sites in Insulin, IGF-1 and FGF receptor mediated signaling networks reveal an extensive potential interactome. Cell Commun. Signal 10, 27 (2012).
23. Krishnan, V., Bane, S. M., Kawle, P. D., Naresh, K. N. & Kalraiya, R. D. Altered melanoma cell surface glycosylation mediates organ specic adhesion and metastasis via lectin receptors on the lung vascular endothelium. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 22, 1124 (2005).
24. Fons, R. D., Bogert, B. A. & Hegde, R. S. Substrate-specic function of the translocon-associated protein complex during translocation across the ER membrane. J. Cell Biol. 160, 529539 (2003).
25. Machesky, L. M. & Johnston, S. A. MIM: a multifunctional scaffold protein.J. Mol. Med. 85, 569576 (2007).26. Saarikangas, J. et al. Molecular mechanisms of membrane deformation by I-BAR domain proteins. Curr. Biol. 19, 95107 (2009).
27. Kim, M. et al. Comparative oncogenomics identies NEDD9 as a melanoma metastasis gene. Cell 125, 12691281 (2006).
28. Scott, K. L. et al. Proinvasion metastasis drivers in early-stage melanoma are oncogenes. Cancer Cell 20, 92103 (2011).
29. Van Raamsdonk, C. D. et al. Frequent somatic mutations of GNAQ in uveal melanoma and blue naevi. Nature 457, 599602 (2009).
30. Hynes, R. O. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell 69, 1125 (1992).
31. Richardson, A., Malik, R. K., Hildebrand, J. D. & Parsons, J. T. Inhibition of cell spreading by expression of the C-terminal domain of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is rescued by coexpression of Src or catalytically inactive FAK: a role for paxillin tyrosine phosphorylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 69066914 (1997).
32. Minn, A. J. et al. Distinct organ-specic metastatic potential of individual breast cancer cells and primary tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 4455 (2005).33. Lim, E. et al. Monitoring tumor metastases and osteolytic lesions with bioluminescence and micro CT imaging. J. Vis. Exp. 50, e2775 (2011).
34. Mattila, P. K. et al. Missing-in-metastasis and IRSp53 deform PI(4,5)P2-rich membranes by an inverse BAR domain-like mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 176, 953964 (2007).
35. Mattila, P. K., Salminen, M., Yamashiro, T. & Lappalainen, P. Mouse MIM, a tissue-specic regulator of cytoskeletal dynamics, interacts with ATP-actin monomers through its C-terminal WH2 domain. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 84528459 (2003).
36. Dawson, J. C., Timpson, P., Kalna, G. & Machesky, L. M. Mtss1 regulates epidermal growth factor signaling in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Oncogene 31, 17811793 (2012).
37. Bompard, G., Sharp, S. J., Freiss, G. & Machesky, L. M. Involvement of Rac in actin cytoskeleton rearrangements induced by MIM-B. J. Cell Sci. 118, 5393 5403 (2005).
38. Ridley, A. J. Life at the leading edge. Cell 145, 10121022 (2011).39. Saarikangas, J. et al. Missing-in-metastasis MIM/MTSS1 promotes actin assembly at intercellular junctions and is required for integrity of kidney epithelia. J. Cell Sci. 124, 12451255 (2011).
40. Breitsprecher, D. et al. Molecular mechanism of Ena/VASP-mediated actinlament elongation. EMBO J. 30, 456467 (2011).
41. Kiuchi, T., Ohashi, K., Kurita, S. & Mizuno, K. Colin promotes stimulus-induced lamellipodium formation by generating an abundant supply of actin monomers. J. Cell Biol. 177, 465476 (2007).
42. Lai, F. P. et al. Arp2/3 complex interactions and actin network turnover in lamellipodia. EMBO J. 27, 982992 (2008).
43. Bernstein, B. W. & Bamburg, J. R. ADF/colin: a functional node in cell biology. Trends Cell Biol. 20, 187195 (2010).
44. Wang, W., Eddy, R. & Condeelis, J. The colin pathway in breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 429440 (2007).
45. Yang, N. et al. Colin phosphorylation by LIM-kinase 1 and its role in Rac-mediated actin reorganization. Nature 393, 809812 (1998).
46. Maekawa, M. et al. Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 285, 895898 (1999).
47. Ramaswamy, S., Ross, K. N., Lander, E. S. & Golub, T. R. A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nat. Genet. 33, 4954 (2003).
48. Gschaider, M. et al. An attempt at a molecular prediction of metastasis in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. PLoS One 7, e49865 (2012).49. Ferber, M. J. et al. Preferential integration of human papillomavirus type 18 near the c-myc locus in cervical carcinoma. Oncogene 22, 72337242 (2003).
50. Gotter, A. L. et al. A palindrome-driven complex rearrangement of 22q11.2 and 8q24.1 elucidated using novel technologies. Genome Res. 17, 470481 (2007).
51. van Duin, M. et al. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of chromosome arm 8q: evaluation of genetic progression markers for prostate cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 44, 438449 (2005).
52. van Duin, M. et al. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of chromosome 8q: evaluation of putative progression markers for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 118, 130137 (2007).
53. Horlings, H. M. et al. Integration of DNA copy number alterations and prognostic gene expression signatures in breast cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 651663 (2010).
54. Nixdorf, S. et al. Expression and regulation of MIM (Missing In Metastasis), a novel putative metastasis suppressor gene, and MIM-B, in bladder cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 215, 209220 (2004).
55. Lee, Y. G., Macoska, J. A., Korenchuk, S. & Pienta, K. J. MIM, a potential metastasis suppressor gene in bladder cancer. Neoplasia 4, 291294 (2002).
56. Loberg, R. D., Logothetis, C. J., Keller, E. T. & Pienta, K. J. Pathogenesis and treatment of prostate cancer bone metastases: targeting the lethal phenotype. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 82328241 (2005).
57. Xie, F. et al. The impact of Metastasis Suppressor-1, MTSS1, on oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its clinical signicance. J. Transl. Med. 9, 95 (2011).
58. Parr, C. & Jiang, W. G. Metastasis suppressor 1 (MTSS1) demonstrates prognostic value and anti-metastatic properties in breast cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 45, 16731683 (2009).
59. Ma, S., Guan, X. Y., Lee, T. K. & Chan, K. W. Clinicopathological signicance of missing in metastasis B expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 38, 12011206 (2007).
60. Glassmann, A. et al. Developmental expression and differentiation-related neuron-specic splicing of metastasis suppressor 1 (Mtss1) in normal and transformed cerebellar cells. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 111 (2007).
61. Quinones, G. A., Jin, J. & Oro, A. E. I-BAR protein antagonism of endocytosis mediates directional sensing during guided cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 189, 353 367 (2010).
62. Ridley, A. J. & Hall, A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress bers in response to growth factors. Cell 70, 389399 (1992).
63. Lin, J. et al. Differential regulation of cortactin and N-WASP-mediated actin polymerization by missing in metastasis (MIM) protein. Oncogene 24, 2059 2066 (2005).
64. Liu, W. et al. MIM regulates vertebrate neural tube closure. Development 138, 20352047 (2011).
65. Quinones, G. A. & Oro, A. E. BAR domain competition during directional cellular migration. Cell Cycle 9, 25222528 (2010).
66. Cox, D. R. Regression models and life-tables. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 34, 187220 (1972).67. Auinger, S. & Small, J. V. Correlated light and electron microscopy of the actin cytoskeleton. Methods Cell Biol. 88, 257272 (2007).
68. Hecker, D., Kappler, J., Glassmann, A., Schilling, K. & Alt, W. Image analysis of time-lapse movies--a precision control guided approach to correct motion artefacts. J. Neurosci. Methods 172, 6773 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr Meenhard Herlyn for valuable discussions, Dr Peter Brader and Dr Martin Krk for conceptual contributions to in vivo imaging, Baerbel Reininger for assistance in FACS-based cell sorting and Dr Herbert Strobl for support in retroviral transduction of melanocytic cells. This work was supported by the FWF-Austrian Science Fund (project L590-B12 to S.N.W.), the Cancer Society of Finland (to P.L.) and the GBPM graduate school (to J.S.). J.V.S. was supported by the FWF-Austrian Science Fund (project P21292-B09) and the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF, project MA09-004).
Author contributions
K.D.M., G.P., C.W. and S.N.W. performed project and experimental planning, experimental work, data interpretation and manuscript writing. J.S. and P.L. performed experimental work and were involved in manuscript preparation. A.S., M.G., F.L., F.N. and W.S. were involved in the bioinformatic and statistical aspects of the manuscript. J.R., M.N., A.G. and D.F. performed experimental work. J.V.S. performed experimental planning and data interpretation. G.S. and L.C. were involved in experimental planning and manuscript writing. S.N.W. supervised all aspects of the research.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Mertz, K. D. et al. MTSS1 is a metastasis driver in a subset of human melanomas. Nat. Commun. 5:3465 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4465 (2014).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3465 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4465 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 11
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2014
Abstract
In cancers with a highly altered genome, distinct genetic alterations drive subsets rather than the majority of individual tumours. Here we use a sequential search across human tumour samples for transcript outlier data points with associated gene copy number variations that correlate with patient's survival to identify genes with pro-invasive functionality. Employing loss and gain of function approaches in vitro and in vivo, we show that one such gene, MTSS1, promotes the ability of melanocytic cells to metastasize and engages actin dynamics via Rho-GTPases and cofilin in this process. Indeed, high MTSS1 expression defines a subgroup of primary melanomas with unfavourable prognosis. These data underscore the biological, clinical and potential therapeutic implications of molecular subsets within genetically complex cancers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer