Inspiratory High Frequency Airway Oscillation Attenuates Resistive Loaded Dyspnea and Modulates Respiratory Function in Young Healthy Individuals

Abstract

Direct chest-wall percussion can reduce breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and respiratory function may be improved, in health and disease, by respiratory muscle training (RMT). We tested whether high-frequency airway oscillation (HFAO), a novel form of airflow oscillation generation can modulate induced dyspnoea and respiratory strength and/or patterns following 5 weeks of HFAO training (n = 20) compared to a SHAM-RMT (conventional flow-resistive RMT) device (n = 15) in healthy volunteers (13 males; aged 20–36 yrs). HFAO causes oscillations with peak-to-peak amplitude of 1 cm H2O, whereas the SHAM-RMT device was identical but created no pressure oscillation. Respiratory function, dyspnoea and ventilation during 3 minutes of spontaneous resting ventilation, 1 minute of maximal voluntary hyperventilation and 1 minute breathing against a moderate inspiratory resistance, were compared PRE and POST 5-weeks of training (2×30 breaths at 70% peak flow, 5 days a week). Training significantly reduced NRS dyspnoea scores during resistive loaded ventilation, both in the HFAO (p = 0.003) and SHAM-RMT (p = 0.005) groups. Maximum inspiratory static pressure (cm H2O) was significantly increased by HFAO training (vs. PRE; p<0.001). Maximum inspiratory dynamic pressure was increased by training in both the HFAO (vs. PRE; p<0.001) and SHAM-RMT (vs. PRE; p = 0.021) groups. Peak inspiratory flow rate (L.s−1) achieved during the maximum inspiratory dynamic pressure manoeuvre increased significantly POST (vs. PRE; p = 0.001) in the HFAO group only. HFAO reduced inspiratory resistive loading–induced dyspnoea and augments static and dynamic maximal respiratory manoeuvre performance in excess of flow-resistive IMT (SHAM-RMT) in healthy individuals without the respiratory discomfort associated with RMT.

About the Authors:

Theresa Morris

Affiliation: Centre of Human & Aerospace Physiological Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

David Paul Sumners

Affiliation: Applied Science, Engineering, Science and the Built Environment, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom

David Andrew Green

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Centre of Human & Aerospace Physiological Sciences, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom

Introduction

Respiratory function is not typically seen as a limitation to activity or exercise performance in healthy individuals, although blood flow re-distribution from skeletal muscles has been suggested during near maximal workloads [1]. Activity limitation is however a feature of respiratory pathology such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (e.g. see review: [2]). Compromised respiratory function (e.g. inspiratory muscle weakness; [3]) can reduce exercise tolerance, via the generation of dyspnoea [4] and the promotion of respiratory fatigue [5].

Dyspnoeic perception is a vital constituent of respiratory-induced activity limitation [6], which processes multiple dimensions: sensations of work/effort, tightness, and air hunger/unsatisfied inspiration in addition to sensory–perceptual experience, affective distress, or symptom/disease impact or burden domains that may co-exist [7]. The experience of dyspnoea can be produced when there is elevated work of breathing [8] presumably via a combination of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary afferent receptors (see [7]) and cortical motor command or corollary discharge [9] that is perceived as uncomfortable or unpleasant [10] [11] [12].

COPD is specifically associated with increased respiratory work (41) and skeletal neuromuscular weakness [13]. Such mechanisms can perpetuate a viscous cycle of functional decline (for review see [14]). Experimental elevation of the perception of breathing effort/work can be reproduced via external resistive or elastic loads [15] by volitional hyperpnoea [16], or neuromuscular blockade [17].

Respiratory muscle training (RMT) and specific inspiratory muscle training (IMT) via flow (nonlinear) resistive loading [18], or pressure-threshold loading [19] [20] has been proposed to improve respiratory function, in health and disease (e.g. [21]). IMT has been shown to increase inspiratory muscle strength, endurance, and relieve exercise-induced dyspnoea [22] [23] [24] in normal healthy individuals [19]. Various training regimes have been employed with high force-low flow IMT eliciting increased force generation (i.e. maximum inspiratory pressure) [25] [26], whereas low force-high flow training eliciting greater flow augmentation [18].

In COPD, unsupervised inspiratory resistive or threshold training at 30% of maximal static respiratory muscle strength (MIP), evoked inspiratory muscle strength, endurance and dyspnoea score improvements [27], [28]. Structural changes such as diaphragmatic thickening [22], [29], and/or increased external intercostal muscle type II fibre size [30] have been noted after only 5 weeks of IMT. However, RMT suitability as a therapy, particularly in those whom are stable remains in question [3], [31]–[33] with unpleasant exaggeration of acute dyspnoea during IMT leading to poor adherence [34] that limits clinical utility.

Short-term tendon or muscle vibration (2–20 s) has been shown to augment skeletal muscle force [35], [36], discharge rates of motor units [37] and primary afferents [38]–[40] whilst modulating spindle afferent feedback [40]. Furthermore, repeated exposure to targeted and whole body vibration (WBV) during muscle contractions, can improve strength [41] and flexibility [42], [43]. Interestingly, WBV has been shown to induce hyperventilation [44], whereas, direct chest-wall percussion can reduce breathlessness in respiratory-limited subjects [45]. However, no device for delivering inspiratory chest wall vibration is available.

High-frequency airway oscillation (HFAO), a novel form of respiratory vibratory stimulation has been shown, following a 10 breath exposure, to increase tidal and dynamic inspiratory mouth pressures (MAXMP) and peak inspiratory flow (PIF) [46], due to inspiratory neural drive augmentation (see review [47]). Intriguingly, neural drive changes to the respiratory accessory muscles [48] have been implicated in the development of acute dyspnoea and COPD [49], [50]. Indeed, vibration-induced augmentation of afferent feedback from the parasternal intercostal muscle spindles using vibration, reduces breathlessness in COPD [35], [45], [51]–[53], that may also, by lowering central neural drive for a given output force, represent improved respiratory mechanical efficiency [54], [55]. However, the timing and site of application of a vibratory stimulus appear important but whose optimal characteristics and form of delivery are unknown [7].

Given the augmentation of voluntary respiratory performance (reflective of increased respiratory output for maximal respiratory drive) seen in response to acute HFAO [46], it potentially offers a high flow/low force method of respiratory training without the unpleasant sensations associated with conventional forms of IMT (high force/low flow). Furthermore, given the fact HFAO appears to modulate respiratory control in a manner different to external respiratory resistance alone [56], we sought to investigate whether HFAO training has an effect upon respiratory function compared to flow-resistive RMT (SHAM-RMT device; that provides similar resistance but no oscillations) thereby addressing the common issue of uncontrolled trials [57] and possibility of placebo effects [58]. The effect of 5-weeks of training was compared during spontaneous, inspiratory resistive loaded (to model restricted respiratory flow i.e. COPD) and voluntary hyperventilatory (to reflect volitional respiratory muscle recruitment capacity) breathing, in young healthy individuals.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Thirty-seven healthy volunteers (non-smokers, free from respiratory disorders; 13 males; aged 20–36 yrs.) gave written informed consent to participate in this blinded training study, approved by the King’s College London (Biomedical Sciences, Medicine, Dentistry and Natural & Mathematical Sciences) ethics committee. One subject was removed from the HFAO group as they trained with a faulty aerosure™ and another from the SHAM-RMT group due to a valve leak during the POST testing session. Hence, 20 participants (6 male, mean [±SD] age 24.2±1.8 yrs.; 170.6±8.9 cm; 68.9±12.6 kg; BMI: 23.5±2.3 kg/m2) were assigned to the High Frequency Oscillation (HFAO) training group and 15 participants (9 male, age 26.3±3.9 yrs.; 173.4±9.1 cm; 74.7±15.2 kg; 24.7±3.5 kg/m2) to the sham (SHAM-RMT) control training group. Participants were all recreationally active, were instructed to adhere to their usual activity regimen and not to engage in strenuous exercise the day before testing.

Study Design

Respiratory function assessment was performed identically, PRE and POST a 5-week training period, with participants tested at the same time of day to minimise any diurnal variability. Participants were asked to refrain from consuming alcohol for 24 hours and caffeine for 3 hours prior to testing in addition to being at least 2 hours post-prandial. Following PRE testing, participants were blindly provided with either a fully functional HFAO (aerosure™ V1; Actegy Ltd, Ascot, UK), or SHAM-RMT device. The HFAO device incorporated a rotating (25 Hz) valve that momentarily restricts airflow causing it to oscillate with a peak-to-peak amplitude of 1 cm H2O, whilst providing a background resistance (during both inspiration and expiration) to flow of 21 cm H2O·L−1·s−1. The SHAM-RMT group received a visually and operatively identical HFAO device, except that it was fitted with a shortened rotating valve that did not occlude airflow, and thus created no pressure oscillation, whilst providing a background resistance of 20 cm H2O·L−1·s−1.

Testing Procedures

Participants sat up straight in a comfortable but firm chair throughout testing, breathing through a mouth piece with a nose clip on. Lung volumes (Inspiratory Capacity, IC; Inspiratory Vital Capacity; IVC, Expiratory Vital Capacity; EVC, Expiratory Residual Volume; ERV) were calculated from maximal inspiratory and expiratory manoeuvres (LSTPD; Fleisch pneumotachograph No. 4, Lausanne, Switzerland; P.K. Morgan Digital Integrator, Morgan, UK) according to the ATS/ETS guidelines [59]. In addition, maximal forced expirations: forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (LSTPD; Vitalograph™ spirometer; Buckingham, UK) were recorded.

Participants also performed maximal dynamic inhalations from a point of maximal exhalation in which peak inspiratory flow (PIF; L·s−1), peak inspiratory mouth pressure (MAXMP; cmH2O), and maximal inspiratory volume (LSTPD) were determined. Maximal static inspiratory mouth pressure (MIP) was recorded against a bung restricting airflow (2 mm open port to prevent the participants developing elevated Buccal pressure) after a maximal exhalation. During both the MAXMP and MIP manoeuvres participants were instructed to fully expire, and then take a rapid maximal inspiration and hold for approximately 4 seconds before the mouth piece was removed and they relaxed.

Breath-by-breath respiratory parameters; inspiratory flow (L·s−1STPD; Fleisch pneumotachograph No. 4, Lausanne, Switzerland), inspiratory volume (LSTPD; Morgan digital integrator, Morgan, UK), inspiratory mouth pressure (cm H2O; DP45-32 pressure transducer, Validyne, California, USA) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2; mmHg; Servomex™ 1440 fast response Gas Analyser, Servomex™, Crowborough, UK) via polyethylene tubing from a vent located close to the mouth piece and Oxygen saturation at the ear (Ohmeda Pulse Oximeter, USA) were recorded during 3 challenge periods. The challenges were: 3 minutes of spontaneous resting ventilation (SRV), 1 minute breathing against an inspiratory resistance of 34 cm H2O·L−1·s−1 (Resistance loaded ventilation; RLV) provided by a narrow bore (3 mm) tubing bore (length; 100 mm), and 1 minute of maximal voluntary hyperventilation (MVH). Each challenge was followed by at least 3 minutes of recovery prior to the next phase in order to negate carry-over effects.

In the final seconds of the RLV challenge dyspnoea as indicated by ‘difficulty in breathing’ in the sensory–perceptual domain was recorded by pointing at an 11-point numeric scale (0–10) [60]. It was established that during resting spontaneous breathing was associated with a score of zero in each participant. 0 was anchored as no sensation and 10 as impossible to breathe. NRS scores were also recorded using the device allocated to that subject prior to (PRE) and following training (POST). Participant’s general wellbeing was assessed with the General Health Questionnaire, SF-12 and Modified Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaires (PAR-Q) before each testing session to ensure the absence of gross health status differences.

Training Protocol

Participants were asked to breathe through their (HFAO or SHAM-RMT) device, with approximately 70% of their maximal inspiratory peak flow (determined and practised in the PRE testing session), 60 times per day (in 2 sets of 30 breaths), 5 days per week, for 5 consecutive weeks. All training was conducted in their own time, away from the laboratory. Each participant received a rubber mouthpiece, nose clip, user manual and were carefully instructed on how to use and care for the device they were given. In order to encourage compliance participants were provided with a daily training diary and received a weekly phone call or text message and were asked to inform the investigator of any problems encountered during the training as soon as possible.

Data Analysis

All data apart from that from the vitalograph, questionnaire and dyspnoea ratings were sampled via an A-D converter (Powerlab, ADInstruments Ltd, Oxford, UK) at 200 Hz and stored with LabChart software (ADInstruments Ltd, Oxford, UK). Stored challenge data files were converted to Spike (v.6, Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK) and analysed using bespoke offline scripts. Mean (±SEM) values were calculated for the respiratory parameters recorded during the final 2 minutes of SRV and the entire 1 minute of RES and MVH. The greatest achieved values were used for all lung function measures having performed each manoeuvre on at least 3 occasions. All physiological parameters were normally distributed (Kolmogorov-Smirnov 1-sample t-test; SPSS v16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), hence 2-way ANOVAs (time-by-group) were performed to investigate the effect of 5-weeks of training (time effect) with the interaction (time*group) effect indicative of differential responses (PRE vs. POST) in the HFAO and SHAM-RMT groups. Post-hoc t-tests were performed for each group where time or interaction effects were noted to determine the location of effect (PRE vs. POST). If group effects were noted, post-hoc independent samples t-tests were performed on PRE or POST intervention (SHAM-RMT vs. HFAO) data. Dyspnoea scores in response to RVH were compared PRE vs. POST 5-weeks training for each group with a Mann-Whitney U test. To investigate if the increase in maximal respiratory muscle performance was responsible for the reductions in dyspnoea, linear regression analysis was conducted between maximal static (MIP) and dynamic (MAXMP) respiratory performance, peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and HFAO-induced reduction in breathlessness. In all cases statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results

The only significant demographic difference between groups was the greater proportion of males allocated to the HFAO group (χ2 = 4.263, p = 0.039). Each participant reported compliance with the training protocol whilst stating overall physical activity was unchanged for the duration of the study. None of the participants were aware there was a control group and all returned for their allotted post-testing session without comment.

Lung Volumes

There were no significant changes in IC, IVC, EVC or ERV following 5-weeks training in either group (Table 1). Training produced a small, albeit statistically significant reduction in FVC (LSTPD) [F(1,31) = 7.266; p = 0.011] across the groups (time effect). However, an interaction effect [F(1,31) = 4.014, p = 0.054] trend highlighted a significant reduction in the SHAM-RMT (p<0.001), but not the HFAO group. Similarly, a significant reduction in FEV1 (LSTPD) was noted across groups following training [F(1,31) = 13.946, p = 0.001]. A significant interaction effect: [F(1,31) = 7.737; p = 0.009] was located by post-hoc testing to a reduction in the SHAM-RMT (p = 0.004) group. SHAM-RMT FVC and FEV1 reductions combined to render FEV1/FVC (%) unchanged, as was expiratory peak flow (L.s−1) in either group (Table 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Mean (±SEM) lung function PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.t001

Respiratory Muscle Strength

MIP values were significantly lower in the HFAO group PRE (vs. SHAM-RMT; p = 0.037) but not different POST training. Hence, 5-weeks of training significantly increased MIP (cm H2O)[F(1,31) = 12.564; p = 0.001], in the HFAO group only (Figure 1; −108.96 v −111.41, Pre v Post, SHAM; −96.56 v −108.04, PRE v POST, HFAO; interaction effect [F(1,31) = 5.277; p = 0.029]). MAXMP (cm H2O) was increased by training [F(1,31) = 21.272; p = 0.001] in both the HFAO (vs. PRE; p<0.001) and SHAM-RMT (vs. PRE; p = 0.021) (Figure 2) groups.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Mean (±SEM) Maximal Static Inspiratory Pressure (MIP; cm H2O), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

* Indicates significant difference PRE vs. POST for that group (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Mean (±SEM) Maximal Dynamic Inspiratory Pressure (MAXMP; cm H2O), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

* Indicates significant difference PRE vs. POST for that group whilst the solid bar indicates significant difference at PRE (SHAM-RMT vs. HFAO) (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.g002

Peak inspiratory flow rate (PIF; L.s−1) was significantly lower in the HFAO group PRE (vs. SHAM-RMT; p = 0.016) but there was no difference POST training. PIF achieved during the MAXMP manoeuvre did not increase significantly across groups. However, an interaction effect [F(1,31) = 11.625; p = 0.002] highlighted an increase POST (vs. PRE; p = 0.001) in the HFAO group, contrasting with a non-significant decrease in the SHAM-RMT group (Figure 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. Mean (±SEM) Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF; L.s−1), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

* Indicates significant difference PRE vs. POST for that group (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.g003

Spontaneous Resting Ventilation (SRV)

Spontaneous resting expiratory time (TE; s) and respiratory frequency (fR: min−1), were unchanged. In contrast, inspiratory time (TI; s) had a tendency to shorten following training (PRE vs. POST) [F(1,31) = 4.008; p = 0.054](Table 2). TI shortening was limited to the HFAO group (p = 0.017), rendering SHAM-RMT significantly longer POST (p = 0.044). Mean peak inspiratory mouth pressure (Peak IMP; mmHg) was reduced following training [F(1,31) = 10.133; p = 0.003] albeit significant only in the SHAM-RMT group (vs. PRE; p = 0.005) (interaction effect; [F(1,31) = 3.816; p = 0.006]). In fact, peak IMP both PRE (vs. SHAM-RMT; p = 0.004) and POST (p<0.001) were significantly greater in the HFAO group.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Mean (±SEM) breath-by-breath parameters during spontaneous resting ventilation (SRV), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.t002

Significant increments of resting peak inspiratory flow (PIF; LSTPD.s−1) were observed, across both groups [F(1,31) = 6.602; p = 0.015], but post-hoc tests revealed that these achieved statistical significance in the SHAM-RMT group only (vs. PRE; p = 0.018). Spontaneous tidal volume (VT; mLSTPD) was significantly increased in the SHAM-RMT group (p = 0.003), whilst remaining unchanged in the HFAO group (interaction effect; [F(1,31) = 4.051; p = 0.053]). In contrast, minute ventilation (VI; LSTPD.min−1) significantly increased over time [F(1,31) = 4.431, p = 0.044], although only significant in the SHAM-RMT group (p = 0.015).

Voluntary Hyperventilation (VHV)

TI, TE and fR were unchanged during VHV in either group following training. Peak IMP [F(1,31) = 11.335; p = 0.002] was augmented across groups, being significant POST (vs. PRE) for both HFAO (p = 0.019) and SHAM-RMT (p = 0.048) (Table 3). The SHAM-RMT group had significantly greater Peak IMP, both PRE (p = 0.050) and POST (p = 0.002). PIF was significantly augmented (interaction: [F(1,31) = 5.180; p = 0.030] in the HFAO group only (p = 0.032), with HFAO PIF significantly lower PRE (p = 0.003) but not POST. 5-weeks of training induced increments in VT [F(1,31) = 5.053; p = 0.032] and VI [F(1,31) = 4.511; p = 0.042] rendering HFAO group values that were lower PRE (p = 0.009 and p = 0.014 respectively) but not different POST.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Mean (±SEM) breath-by-breath respiratory parameters during voluntary hyperventilation (VHV), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.t003

Resistive Loaded Ventilation (RLV)

Inspiratory resistive loaded TI, TE, fR, were unchanged in either group following 5–weeks training (Table 4). Peak IMP was significantly augmented across both groups [F(1,31) = 5.725; p = 0.023] following training, but post-hoc individual group testing was non-significant. Significant increments in PIF [F(1,31) = 11.796, p = 0.002] were observed in the SHAM-RMT (p = 0.002) group only (interaction effect; [F(1,31) = 11.146; p = 0.002]).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Mean (±SEM) breath-by-breath respiratory parameters during resistive loaded ventilation (RLV), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.t004

VT increased only in the SHAM-RMT group (interaction effect; [F(1,31) = 6.840; p = 0.014]), whilst remaining unchanged in the HFAO group. This contributed to (group effect; [F(1,31) = 7.094; p = 0.012]) SHAM-RMT being significantly greater than HFAO POST training (p = 0.002). VI increased across the groups [F(1,31) = 11.759; p = 0.002], however an interaction effect [F(1,31) = 11.146; p = 0.002] and post-hoc testing indicated increments were only in the SHAM-RMT group (p = 0.002). Oxygen saturation was unchanged (97% ±2) with respect to SRV (98% ±2).

Subjective Respiratory Function - Dyspnoea

NRS dyspnoea scores during inspiratory resistance loading were significantly reduced, both in the HFAO (p = 0.003) and SHAM-RMT (p = 0.005) groups following training (Figure 4). NRS scores of 0 were declared during HFAO and SHAM-RMT use PRE, during and POST training. There was no correlation between improvements in MIP, MAXMP or PIF and reduced dyspnoea.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Mean (±SEM) Dyspnoea during Resistive Loaded Ventilation (RLV; NRS Score; 0–10), PRE and POST 5 weeks of training in the SHAM-RMT and HFAO groups.

* Indicates significant difference PRE vs. POST for that group (p<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291.g004

Discussion

The main findings of this study were that 5-weeks high-frequency airway oscillation (HFAO) training caused a significant reduction in dyspnoea during an inspiratory resistive loaded challenge and significant increase in peak inspiratory airflow (PIF) during a maximal inhalation. This was accompanied by an augmentation in both maximal dynamic (MAXMP) and static inspiratory pressure development (MIP) but only a strong tendency towards increased peak mouth pressure development during maximal voluntary hyperventilation. HFAO training had no effect upon ventilation during spontaneous nor during an inspiratory resistive loading challenge. Some of the effects seen following HFAO training were also observed after SHAM-RMT training highlighting the need for appropriate placebo control groups.

Both HFAO and SHAM-RMT training relieved dyspnoea during an inspiratory resistive-loaded challenge, albeit the former was slightly greater. A reduction of 1 on a 0–10 NRS (or its equivalent on other ratings scales e.g. visual analogue [61], BORG [62], Likert-like [63] scales is functionally significant [64] in excess of the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) irrespective of the cause of dyspnoea [65]–[67].

IMT has been shown to reduce dyspnoea, although the mechanism(s) by which this is achieved is unclear [28]. Reduction may reflect improved respiratory muscle efficiency [68] and/or augmented inspiratory muscle force generation capacity that would lower efferent drive required for a given VI [54], [69]. Presumably this would attenuate corollary discharge to the respiratory sensory areas [70], thereby limiting dyspnoea [71], [72]. IMT may also reduce accessory respiratory muscle recruitment, which appears to enhance dyspnoeic sensations more strongly than elevated diaphragmatic activation [68].

Unfortunately, this study did not measure respiratory EMG [48] and thus cannot assess changes in activity nor estimate diaphragmatic/accessory respiratory muscle balance [73]. In addition, measurement of lung volume and thoracic-abdominal motions with magnetometry might inform whether length-tension diaphragmatic advantages are elicited [74] which may reduce the work of breathing, dyspnoea [75], inependent of vagal-induced modulation [76] and changes in alveolar/arterial blood gas levels [77]. However, regression analysis revealed that the relief of dyspnoea during RLV was unrelated to increase in performance during maximal respiratory maneuvers, suggesting that the mechansisms behind reduced dyspnoea and improved respiratory strength differ. This counters the hypothesis that increased force generating capacity lowers corollary discharge [78] for a given ventilatory load, but mirrors the variable relationship between FEV1 and dyspnoea in provocated asthma [79].

Respiratory vibration appears to have phase-specific effects as in-phase chest wall vibration during inspiration relieved breathlessness [45], whereas out of phase vibration increased breathlessness [51] in COPD. Thus, muscle spindle reflex activation modifies the cortico-spinal respiratory controller input-output relationship – reducing central respiratory drive [80]–[82] and may underlie HFAO–induced dyspnoea relief and acute maximal respiratory augmentation [46]. Such an effect would be particularly advantageous in COPD patients as neural respiratory drive is elevated and appears related to disease severity [48] and has been suggested as a potential approach for intractable dyspnoea [83]. However, this would contradict data showing no supraspinal effect of canine rib vibration [84]. In fact the role of chest wall mechanoreceptor feedback in providing relief is equivocal [85]. Further, because respiratory muscle EMG was not recorded in this study, it is difficult to speculate on whether the pressure oscillations in the air column are large enough to be detected by respiratory muscle spindles or other chest wall receptors. Unpublished pilot respiratory EMG data from our lab shows harmonics around the primary oscillatory frequency suggestive of the possibility of a role for chest wall afferents.

Whether vibration-induced reductions in breathlessness are due to attenuated central respiratory drive remains to be determined, however changes in neural respiratory drive might explain the increase in ventilation (flow and pressures) observed post training. However, such effects were seen in both groups during the voluntary hyperventilation challenge. Unfortunately, dyspnoea was not recorded and isocapnia not maintained (although subjects oxygen saturation did not deviate from normal levels [∼98%]). Thus inhibitory drive [86] may have masked differential respiratory muscle performance augmentation and/or changes in feedback produced by both training stimuli such as lower lactate production seen following IMT [87], [88], attributed to increased inspiratory muscle oxidative [89] and lactate transport capacity.

HFAO-induced increments in PIF during maximal inspiratory manoeuvres suggests that performance improvements were not due to large airway bronchoconstriction, but rather that there could be airway stretch receptor mediated bronchodilation [90]–[92] that may be beneficial for airway restrictive conditions such as asthma and COPD [93]. In contrast, SHAM-RMT training saw a non-significant reduction in PIF despite an increase in MAXmp which could indicate airway narrowing and increased resistance to flow [94] which is supported by the reduction in FEV1 and FVC in the SHAM-RMT group.

MAXmp was significantly increased following HFAO, consistent with it being a high flow/low force training stimulus. SHAM-RMT also significantly increased MAXmp but to a lesser extent, which may relate to the fact that the resistance provided is a flow-resistive form of RMT shown to increase respiratory muscle strength [58], [95]. The augmentation of MIP following HFAO training is comparable to other forms of IMT such as pressure-threshold training [58] but was not anticipated as HFAO is a high flow/low force mode of respiratory training. Such findings suggest that HFAO offers a broad stimulus sufficient to activate adaptive pathways that could involve improved neuromuscular recruitment, despite IMT demonstrating specificity analogous to skeletal muscle training [96]. The preservation of such effects post training was not tested but presumably is similar to the reversibility of IMT effects seen in healthy [96] and COPD patients [97], [98].

Whilst as expected HFAO had no effect on lung function in young healthy individuals, the SHAM-RMT group demonstrated a reduction in FVC and FEV1 that could relate to increased airway resistance [99], [100] as suggested by the increase in MAXmp and reduction in PIF. However, other forms of IMT have either demonstrated no change [101] or an increase in lung function both in healthy participants and cystic fibrosis patients [102]. Whereas, the flutter expiratory mucus clearance device augmented forced vital capacity in healthy older individuals [103] suggestive that high frequency expiratory oscillations may augment respiratory performance. Increasing expiratory muscle strength could assist in reducing COPD hyperinflation [104] and strengthen cough, which may facilitate sputum expectoration [105]. Thus, HFAO might be beneficial without the promotion of dynamic hyperinflation.

In conclusion, high-frequency airway oscillation augments static and dynamic maximal respiratory manoeuvre performance in a manner comparable with conventional pressure-threshold or flow-resistive inspiratory muscle training and reduces inspiratory resistive loading–induced dyspnoea in healthy individuals without respiratory discomfort associated with training exposure. HFAO may assist elucidation of the mechanisms underlying dyspnoea and assist definition of optimal vibration characteristics for its relief.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Lindsey Marjoram for her willing assistance and the patience of our participants.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TM DPS DAG. Performed the experiments: TM DPS DAG. Analyzed the data: TM DPS DAG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TM DPS DAG. Wrote the paper: TM DPS DAG.

Citation: Morris T, Sumners DP, Green DA (2014) Inspiratory High Frequency Airway Oscillation Attenuates Resistive Loaded Dyspnea and Modulates Respiratory Function in Young Healthy Individuals. PLoS ONE 9(3): e91291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091291

References

1. Guenette JA, Sheel AW (2007) Physiological consequences of a high work of breathing during heavy exercise in humans. Journal of science and medicine in sport/Sports Medicine Australia 10: 341–50

2. O'Donnell DE, Ora J, Webb KA, Laveneziana P, Jensen D (2009) Mechanisms of activity-related dyspnea in pulmonary diseases. Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 167: 116–32

3. Decramer M (2009) Response of the respiratory muscles to rehabilitation in COPD. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 107: 971–6

4. O'Donnell DE, Webb KA (2008) The major limitation to exercise performance in COPD is dynamic hyperinflation. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 105: 753–5 discussion 755–7

5. Witt JD, Guenette JA, Rupert JL, McKenzie DC, Sheel AW (2007) Inspiratory muscle training attenuates the human respiratory muscle metaboreflex. The Journal of physiology 584: 1019–28

6. Braido F, Baiardini I, Menoni S, Bagnasco A, Balbi F, et al. (2011) Disability in COPD and its relationship to clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Current medical research and opinion 27: 981–6

7. Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, Banzett RB, Manning HL, et al. (2012) An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 185: 435–52

8. Gandevia S, Macefield G (1989) Projection of low-threshold afferents from human intercostal muscles to the cerebral cortex. Respiration Physiology 77: 203–14.

9. el-Manshawi A, Killian KJ, Summers E, Jones NL (1986) Breathlessness during exercise with and without resistive loading. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 61: 896–905.

10. Widdicombe J (2009) Lung afferent activity: Implications for respiratory sensation. Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 167: 2–8

11. Lee L (2009) Respiratory sensations evoked by activation of bronchopulmonary C-fibers. Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 167: 26–35

12. Undem B, Nassenstein C (2009) Airway nerves and dyspnea associated with inflammatory airway disease. Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 167: 36–44

13. Wouters EF (2002) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 5: Systemic effects of COPD. Thorax 57: 1067–1070

14. Calverley PM (2006) Exercise and dyspnoea in COPD. European Respiratory Review 15: 72–79

15. Simon P, Schwartzstein R, Weiss J, Lahive K, Fencl V, et al. (1989) Distinguishable sensations of breathlessness induced in normal volunteers. The American review of respiratory disease 140: 1021–7

16. Killian K, Gandevia S, Summers E, Campbell E (1984) Effect of increased lung volume on perception of breathlessness, effort, and tension. Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology 57: 686–91.

17. Moosavi S, Topulos G, Hafer A, Lansing R, Adams L, et al. (2000) Acute partial paralysis alters perceptions of air hunger, work and effort at constant P(CO(2)) and V(E). Respiration Physiology 122: 45–60.

18. O'Kroy J, Coast J (1993) Effects of flow and resistive training on respiratory muscle endurance and strength. Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases 60: 279–83.

19. McConnell AK, Griffiths LA (2010) Acute cardiorespiratory responses to inspiratory pressure threshold loading. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 42: 1696–703

20. Reid WD, Samrai B (1995) Respiratory muscle training for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Physical therapy 75: 996–1005.

21. Geddes EL, O'Brien K, Reid WD, Brooks D, Crowe J (2008) Inspiratory muscle training in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an update of a systematic review. Respiratory Medicine 102: 1715–29

22. Downey AE, Chenoweth LM, Townsend DK, Ranum JD, Ferguson CS, et al. (2007) Effects of inspiratory muscle training on exercise responses in normoxia and hypoxia. Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 156: 137–146.

23. Edwards AM, Cooke CB (2004) Oxygen uptake kinetics and maximal aerobic power are unaffected by inspiratory muscle training in healthy subjects where time to exhaustion is extended. European Journal of Applied Physiology 93: 139–44

24. Volianitis S, McConnell A, Koutedakis Y, McNaughton L, Backx K, et al. (2001) Inspiratory muscle training improves rowing performance. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 33: 803–9.

25. Bailey SJ, Romer LM, Kelly J, Wilkerson DP, DiMenna FJ, et al. (2010) Inspiratory muscle training enhances pulmonary O(2) uptake kinetics and high-intensity exercise tolerance in humans. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 109: 457–68

26. McConnell AK, Romer LM (2004) Respiratory muscle training in healthy humans: resolving the controversy. International journal of sports medicine 25: 284–93

27. Nield M (1999) Inspiratory muscle training protocol using a pressure threshold device: effect on dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 80: 100–2.

28. Gosselink R, de Vos} J, van den Heuvel SP, Segers J, Decramer M, et al. (2011) Impact of inspiratory muscle training in patients with COPD: what is the evidence? The European respiratory journal : official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology 37: 416–25

29. Enright SJ, Unnithan VB, Heward C, Withnall L, Davies DH (2006) Effect of High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training on Lung Volumes, Diaphragm Thickness, and Exercise. 86: 345–354.

30. Ramirez-Sarmiento A, Orozco-Levi M, Guell R, Barreiro E, Hernandez N, et al. (2002) Inspiratory muscle training in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: structural adaptation and physiologic outcomes. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 166: 1491–7

31. Ries A, Bauldoff G, Carlin B, Casaburi R, Emery C, et al. (2007) Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 131: 4S–42S

32. Nici L, Donner C, Wouters E, Zuwallack R, Ambrosino N, et al. (2006) American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 173: 1390–413

33. Ambrosino N, Casaburi R, Ford G, Goldstein R, Morgan MD, et al. (2008) Developing concepts in the pulmonary rehabilitation of COPD. Respiratory Medicine 102 Suppl 1S17–26

34. Turner LA, Mickleborough TD, McConnell AK, Stager JM, Tecklenburg-Lund S, et al. (2011) Effect of inspiratory muscle training on exercise tolerance in asthmatic individuals. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 43: 2031–8

35. Homma I, Eklund G, Hagbarth KE (1978) Respiration in Man Affected by Tvr Contractions Elicited in Inspiratory and Expiratory Intercostal Muscles. Respiration Physiology 35: 335–348

36. Bongiovanni LG, Hagbarth KE (1990) Tonic vibration reflexes elicited during fatigue from maximal voluntary contractions in man. The Journal of physiology 423: 1–14.

37. Griffin L, Garland SJ, Ivanova T, Gossen ER (2001) Muscle vibration sustains motor unit firing rate during submaximal isometric fatigue in humans. The Journal of physiology 535: 929–36.

38. Burke D, Hagbarth K (1976) The responses of human muscle spindle endings to vibration of non-contracting muscles. The Journal of physiology 261: 673–693.

39. HUFSCHMIDT H (1958) [Is a special reflex series produced by muscle vibration]. Pflügers Archiv: European journal of physiology 267: 508–16.

40. Marsden C, Meadows J, Hodgson H (1969) Observations on the reflex response to muscle vibration in man and its voluntary control. Brain : a journal of neurology 92: 829–46.

41. Delecluse C, Roelants M, Verschueren S (2003) Strength increase after whole-body vibration compared with resistance training. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 35: 1033–41

42. Gerodimos V, Zafeiridis A, Karatrantou K, Vasilopoulou T, Chanou K, et al. (2010) The acute effects of different whole-body vibration amplitudes and frequencies on flexibility and vertical jumping performance. Journal of science and medicine in sport/Sports Medicine Australia 13: 438–43

43. Wilcock IM, Whatman C, Harris N, Keogh JW (2009) Vibration training: could it enhance the strength, power, or speed of athletes? Journal of strength and conditioning research/National Strength & Conditioning Association 23: 593–603

44. Lamb TW, Tenney SM (2012) Nature of vibration hyperventilation. Nature of vibration hyperventilation’: 404–410.

45. Fujie T, Tojo N, Inase N, Nara N, Homma I, et al. (2002) Effect of chest wall vibration on dyspnea during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 130: 305–16.

46. Sumners DP, Green DA, Mileva KN, Bowtell JL (2008) Increases in inspiratory neural drive in response to rapid oscillating airflow braking forces (vibration). Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 160: 350–2

47. Mitchell GS, Johnson SM (2003) Neuroplasticity in respiratory motor control. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 94: 358–74

48. Jolley CJ, Luo Y, Steier J, Reilly C, Seymour J, et al. (2009) Neural respiratory drive in healthy subjects and in COPD. The European respiratory journal: official journal of the European Society for Clinical Respiratory Physiology 33: 289–97

49. de Troyer A, Peche R, Yernault J, Estenne M (1994) Neck muscle activity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 150: 41–7

50. Gandevia S, Leeper J, McKenzie D, Troyer A (1996) Discharge frequencies of parasternal intercostal and scalene motor units during breathing in normal and COPD subjects. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 153: 622–8

51. Sibuya M, Yamada M, Kanamaru A, Tanaka K, Suzuki H, et al. (1994) Effect of chest wall vibration on dyspnea in patients with chronic respiratory disease. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 149: 1235–40

52. Cristiano LM, Schwartzstein RM (1997) Effect of chest wall vibration on dyspnea during hypercapnia and exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 155: 1552–1559.

53. Nakayama H, Shibuya M, Yamada M, Suzuki H, Arakawa M, et al. (1998) In-phase chest wall vibration decreases dyspnea during arm elevation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) 37: 831–5.

54. Redline S, Gottfried SB, Altose MD (1991) Effects of changes in inspiratory muscle strength on the sensation of respiratory force. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 70: 240–5.

55. Huang CH, Martin AD, Davenport PW (2009) Effects of inspiratory strength training on the detection of inspiratory loads. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 34: 17–26

56. Sumners DP, Hunter SP, Green (2009) Respiratory modulation in response to high-frequency airway occlusion delivered during inspiration or expiration. European journal of applied.

57. Bailey CD, Wagland R, Dabbour R, Caress A, Smith J, et al. (2010) An integrative review of systematic reviews related to the management of breathlessness in respiratory illnesses. BMC pulmonary medicine 10: 63

58. Sonetti DA, Wetter TJ, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA (2001) Effects of respiratory muscle training versus placebo on endurance exercise performance. Respiration Physiology 127: 185–99.

59. Miller M, Crapo R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, et al. (2005) General considerations for lung function testing. The European respiratory journal 26: 153–61

60. Gift AG, Narsavage G (1998) Validity of the numeric rating scale as a measure of dyspnea. American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses 7: 200–4.

61. Gift AG (1989) Validation of a vertical visual analogue scale as a measure of clinical dyspnea. Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses 14: 323–5.

62. Borg GA (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 14: 377–81.

63. Guyatt GH, Townsend M, Berman LB, Keller JL (1987) A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. Journal of chronic diseases 40: 1129–33.

64. Oxberry SG, Bland JM, Clark AL, Cleland JG, Johnson MJ (2012) Minimally clinically important difference in chronic breathlessness: every little helps. American Heart Journal 164: 229–35

65. Mahler DA, Witek TJ (2005) The MCID of the Transition Dyspnea Index is a Total Score of One Unit. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2: 99–103

66. Sloan JA (2005) Assessing the minimally clinically significant difference: scientific considerations, challenges and solutions. Copd 2: 57–62.

67. Ries AL (2005) Minimally Clinically Important Difference for the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, Borg Scale, and Visual Analog Scale. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2: 105–110

68. Breslin EH (1990) Correlations between dyspnea, diaphragm and sternomastoid recruitment during inspiratory resistance breathing in normal subjects. CHEST Journal 98: 298

69. Kellerman BA, Martin AD, Davenport PW (2000) Inspiratory strengthening effect on resistive load detection and magnitude estimation. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 32: 1859–67.

70. Evans KC (2010) Cortico-limbic circuitry and the airways: Insights from functional neuroimaging of respiratory afferents and efferents. Biological psychology 84: 13–25

71. McConnell AK, Romer LM (2004) Dyspnoea in health and obstructive pulmonary disease : the role of respiratory muscle function and training. Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) 34: 117–32.

72. Moosavi SH, Banzett RB, Butler JP (2004) Time course of air hunger mirrors the biphasic ventilatory response to hypoxia. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 97: 2098–103

73. Grimby G, Bunn J, Mead J (2012) Relative contribution of rib cage and abdomen to ventilation during exercise. Relative contribution to ventilation during of rib cage and abdomen: 159–166.

74. Smith J, Mead J (1986) Three degree of freedom description of movement of the human chest wall. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 60: 928–34.

75. Manning H, Shea S, Schwartzstein R, Lansing R, Brown R, et al. (1992) Reduced tidal volume increases “air hunger” at fixed PCO2 in ventilated quadriplegics. Respiration Physiology 90: 19–30.

76. Eldridge FL, Chen Z (1992) Respiratory-associated rhythmic firing of midbrain neurons is modulated by vagal input. Respiration Physiology 90: 31–46.

77. Flume PA, Eldridge FL, Edwards LJ, Houser LM (1994) The Fowler breathholding study revisited: continuous rating of respiratory sensation. Respiration Physiology 95: 53–66.

78. Gandevia SC (1987) Roles for perceived voluntary motor commands in motor control. Trends in Neurosciences 10: 81–85

79. Marks G, Yates D, Sist M, Ceyhan B, Campos M, et al. (1996) Respiratory sensation during bronchial challenge testing with methacholine, sodium metabisulphite, and adenosine monophosphate. Thorax 51: 793–8.

80. Bolser DC, Lindsey BG, Shannon R (1988) Respiratory pattern changes produced by intercostal muscle/rib vibration. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 64: 2458–62.

81. Nishino T, Iiyori N, Isono S, Shinozuka N, Taguchi N, et al. (2009) THAM improves an experimentally induced severe dyspnea. Journal of pain and symptom management 37: 212–9

82. Bolser DC, Lindsey BG, Shannon R (1987) Medullary Inspiratory Activity - Influence of Intercostal Tendon Organs and Muscle-Spindle Endings. Journal of Applied Physiology 62: 1046–1056.

83. Nishino T, Ide T, Sudo T, Sato J (2000) Inhaled furosemide greatly alleviates the sensation of experimentally induced dyspnea. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 161: 1963–7

84. Leduc D, De Troyer A (2003) Mechanical effect of muscle spindles in the canine external intercostal muscles. The Journal of physiology.

85. Butler J, Anand A, Crawford M, Glanville A, McKenzie D, et al. (2001) Changes in respiratory sensations induced by lobeline after human bilateral lung transplantation. The Journal of physiology 534: 583–93.

86. Bongianni F, Fontana GA, Mutolo D, Pantaleo T (1996) Effects of central chemical drive on poststimulatory respiratory depression of laryngeal origin in the adult cat. Brain research bulletin 39: 267–73.

87. Brown PI, Sharpe GR, Johnson MA (2008) Inspiratory muscle training reduces blood lactate concentration during volitional hyperpnoea. European Journal of Applied Physiology 104: 111–7

88. Verges S, Renggli AS, Notter DA, Spengler CM (2009) Effects of different respiratory muscle training regimes on fatigue-related variables during volitional hyperpnoea. Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 169: 282–90

89. Turner LA, Tecklenburg-Lund SL, Chapman RF, Stager JM, Wilhite DP, et al. (2012) Inspiratory muscle training lowers the oxygen cost of voluntary hyperpnea. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 112: 127–34

90. Coon RL (1993) Reflex bronchodilation produced by phasic ventilation of the lungs. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 74: 811–6.

91. Man GC, Teo KK, Kappagoda CT, Man SF (1990) Reflex changes in tracheal smooth muscle tone during high-frequency oscillation. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) 68: 714–9.

92. NADEL JA, TIERNEY DF (1961) Effect of a previous deep inspiration on airway resistance in man. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY 16: 717–9.

93. Diba C, King GG, Berend N, Salome CM (2011) Improved respiratory system conductance following bronchodilator predicts reduced exertional. Respiratory Medicine 105: 1345–1351

94. How SC, McConnell AK, Taylor BJ, Romer LM (2007) Acute and chronic responses of the upper airway to inspiratory loading in healthy awake humans: an MRI study. Respiratory physiology \& neurobiology 157: 270–80

95. Koppers RJ, Vos PJ, Folgering HT (2006) Tube breathing as a new potential method to perform respiratory muscle training: safety in healthy volunteers. Respiratory Medicine 100: 714–20

96. Romer LM, McConnell AK (2003) Specificity and reversibility of inspiratory muscle training. Medicine and science in sports and exercise 35: 237–44

97. Beckerman M, Magadle R, Weiner M, Weiner P (2005) The effects of 1 year of specific inspiratory muscle training in patients with COPD. Chest 128: 3177–82

98. Weiner P, Magadle R, Beckerman M, Weiner M, Berar-Yanay N (2004) Maintenance of inspiratory muscle training in COPD patients: one year follow-up. European Respiratory Journal 23: 61–65

99. Kaminsky DA (2012) What does airway resistance tell us about lung function? Respiratory care 57: 85–96 discussion 96–9

100. Mahut B, Peiffer C, Bokov P, Delclaux C, Beydon N (2011) Use of specific airway resistance to assess bronchodilator response in children. Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) 16: 666–71

101. Romer LM, McConnell AK, Jones DA (2002) Effects of inspiratory muscle training upon recovery time during high intensity, repetitive sprint activity. International journal of sports medicine 23: 353–60

102. Enright S, Chatham K, Ionescu AA, Unnithan VB, Shale DJ (2004) Inspiratory muscle training improves lung function and exercise capacity in adults with cystic fibrosis. Chest 126: 405–11

103. Wang Q, Zhang X, Li Q (2010) Effects of a flutter mucus-clearance device on pulmonary function test results in healthy people 85 years and older in China. Respiratory care 55: 1449–52.

104. Weiner P (2003) Comparison of Specific Expiratory, Inspiratory, and Combined Muscle Training Programs in COPD*. CHEST Journal 124: 1357

105. Gosselink R, Kovacs L, Ketelaer P, Carton H, Decramer M (2000) Respiratory muscle weakness and respiratory muscle training in severely disabled multiple sclerosis patients. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 81: 747–51.