Identification of SUMO activating enzyme 1 inhibitors utilizing virtual screening approach

Abstract

Doc number: P37

From: 9th German Conference on Chemoinformatics Fulda, Germany 10-12 November 2013

Author details 1-Zhang Initiative Research Unit, Institute laboratories, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
2-Chemical Genetics Laboratory/Chemical Genomics Research Group, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan

Supplemental Information:
Title: 9th German Conference on Chemoinformatics
Note: Meeting abstracts

Sumoylation is a post-translational modification affecting diverse cellular processes including DNA replication and repair, chromosome packing and dynamics, genome integrity, nuclear transport, signal transduction and cell proliferation [1]. Sumoylation involves the covalent attachment of a small ubiquitin like modifier (SUMO) protein to [straight epsilon]-amino group of lysine residues in specific target proteins via a sequential action of an activating enzyme E1 (SUMO E1), a conjugating enzyme E2 and a ligase E3. Among the sumoylation proteins, SUMO E1 is responsible for the activation of SUMO in the first step of the sumoylation cascade [2]. SUMO E1 is linked to many human diseases including cancer and thus making it a potential therapeutic target [3]. However, only a few inhibitors were reported up to now that includes three natural products, semi-synthetic protein inhibitors and one AMP mimic [4-6]. Here in this research, the combination of structure based virtual screening and in vitro sumoylation assay was used to identify potential small molecule inhibitors of SUMO E1 that could be used in chemical biology and therapeutic studies. Our virtual screening protocol involves the fast docking of a small molecule library to rigid protein followed by redocking of top hits using a method that incorporates both ligand and protein flexibility. Subsequently, the top ranking compounds were prioritized using molecular dynamics simulation based binding free energy calculation. The result of biological assay and subsequent similarity search resulted in the identification of two classes of small molecules that shared biaryl urea scaffold. Both of these chemical classes displayed moderate inhibitory potency against SUMO E1. The most potent compound of each class inhibited the in vitro sumoylation with an IC₅₀ of 11.1 and 13.4 μM. These compounds inhibit sumoylation by blocking the formation of SUMO-E1 thioester intermediate. Our study presents starting points for the development of novel therapeutic agents against various diseases targeting SUMO E1.

References

[1] Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F, Concepts in sumoylation: a decade onIn Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,2007,8:947-956.

[2] Lois LM, Lima CD, Structures of the SUMO E1 provide mechanistic insights into SUMO activation and E2 recruitment to E1In EMBO J,2005,24:439-451.

[3] Kessler JD, Kahle KT, A SUMOylation-Dependent Transcriptional Subprogram Is Required for Myc-Driven TumorigenesisIn Science,2012,335:348-353.

[4] Fukuda I, Ito A, Ginkgolic acid inhibits protein SUMOylation by blocking formation of the E1-SUMO intermediateIn Chem Biol,2009,16:133-140.

[5] Lu X, Olsen SK, Designed semisynthetic protein inhibitors of Ub/Ubl E1 activating enzymesIn J Am Chem Soc,2010,132:1748-1749.

[6] Soucy TA, An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancerIn Nature,2009,458:732-736.