Low Muscle Strength Is Associated with Metabolic Risk Factors in Colombian Children: The ACFIES Study

Abstract

Purpose

In youth, poor cardiorespiratory and muscular strength are associated with elevated metabolic risk factors. However, studies examining associations between strength and risk factors have been done exclusively in high income countries, and largely in Caucasian cohorts. The aim of this study was to assess these interactions in schoolchildren in Colombia, a middle income Latin American country.

Methods

We measured body mass index, body composition, handgrip strength (HG), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and metabolic risk factors in 669 low-middle socioeconomic status Colombian schoolchildren (mean age 11.52±1.13, 47% female). Associations between HG, CRF and metabolic risk factors were evaluated.

Results

HG and CRF were inversely associated with blood pressure, HOMA index and a composite metabolic risk score (p<0.001 for all) and HG was also inversely associated with triglycerides and C-reactive protein (CRP) (both p<0.05). Associations between HG and risk factors were marginally weakened after adjusting for CRF, while associations between CRF and these factors were substantially weakened after adjusting for HG. Linear regression analyses showed inverse associations between HG and systolic BP (β = −0.101; p = 0.047), diastolic BP (β = −0.241; p> = 0.001), HOMA (β = −0.164; p = 0.005), triglycerides (β = −0.583; p = 0.026) and CRP (β = −0.183; p = 0.037) but not glucose (p = 0.698) or HDL cholesterol (p = 0.132). The odds ratios for having clustered risk in the weakest quartile compared with the strongest quartile were 3.0 (95% confidence interval: 1.81–4.95).

Conclusions

In Colombian schoolchildren both poorer handgrip strength/kg body mass and cardiorespiratory fitness were associated with a worse metabolic risk profile. Associations were stronger and more consistent between handgrip and risk factors than between cardiorespiratory fitness and these risk factors. Our findings indicate the addition of handgrip dynamometry to non-invasive youth health surveillance programs would improve the accuracy of the assessment of cardio-metabolic health.

About the Authors:

Daniel Dylan Cohen

Affiliations Dirección de Investigaciones, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia, Facultad de la Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

Diego Gómez-Arbeláez

Affiliations Dirección de Investigaciones, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia, Facultad de la Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

Paul Anthony Camacho

Affiliation: Dirección de Investigaciones, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia

Sandra Pinzon

Affiliation: Facultad de la Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

Claudia Hormiga

Affiliation: Dirección de Investigaciones, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia

Juanita Trejos-Suarez

Affiliation: Facultad de la Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

John Duperly

Affiliation: Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia

Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Dirección de Investigaciones, Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander (FOSCAL), Floridablanca, Santander, Colombia, Facultad de la Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Santander, Colombia

Introduction

In youth, poor performance in measures of cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness are associated with elevated clustered metabolic risk and cardiovascular risk factors such as triglycerides, HOMA index and inflammatory markers [1]–[4]. Fitness tracks from youth into adulthood [5], where both low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscular strength are associated with elevated risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease and total mortality [6]. Evidence that both of these components of fitness are declining in children internationally [7], [8] is therefore worrying from a public health perspective. Based on associations with health and the feasibility of implementing these measures on a large scale in schools [9], [10], it is argued that the assessment of CRF and muscular strength should be included as part of health monitoring in youth [11]. Nonetheless, to justify their inclusion in surveillance efforts, particularly in countries where resources are limited, these tests must be validated as markers of CV risk in diverse populations. While associations between CRF and CV risk factors have been evaluated in youth from both high- and low-middle income countries [1]–[4], [12], [13], studies examining interactions between muscular strength and risk factors have been done exclusively in high income countries, and largely in Caucasian cohorts [14]. There is a need to also assess these associations in low-middle income countries, where there is a larger and more rapidly increasing burden of non-communicable disease [15].

The primary aim of this study was to assess relationships between muscular strength, CRF and cardio-metabolic health profile in schoolchildren in Colombia, a middle income Latin American country.

Materials and Methods

Study Population

During the 2011–2012 school year, we conducted the cross-sectional component of the ACFIES study (Association between Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Muscular Strength and Body Composition with Metabolic Risk Factors in Colombian Children). The sample comprised 669 low-middle socioeconomic status (SES 1–3 on a scale of 1–6 defined by the Colombian government) schoolchildren (aged 8 to 14 years, 47% female) enrolled in public elementary and high schools (grades 5 and 6) in the city of Bucaramanga, Colombia.

Ethics Statement

The health research ethics board of the Ophthalmological Foundation of Santander approved all study procedures. The children expressed their interest in participating in the study, and parents or legal guardians gave written informed consent before the children were included in the study.

Measures

Body weight was measured in underwear and no shoes, using electronic scales (Tanita BC544, Tokyo, Japan). Height was measured using a mechanical stadiometer platform (Seca 274, Hamburg, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing body weight (kg) by height squared (cm2). Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest using a tape measure (Ohaus 8004-MA, NJ, USA). Body composition was estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis (Tanita BC544, Tokyo, Japan). Blood pressure was assessed after a period of sitting using an automatic oscillometric device (Omron HEM 757 CAN, Hoofddorp, Holland) with a pediatric cuff. Sexual maturation was determined by stage of secondary sexual development by a physician following the methodology described by Tanner and Whitehouse [16].

Blood samples of 20 ml were taken from the antecubital vein between 07∶00 and 09∶00 am after an overnight fast. Participants were asked not to do any prolonged exercise in the previous 24 hours. The tests were processed in the laboratory of the School of Bacteriology, University of Santander. The glucose and lipid profile were assessed using a routine colorimetric method (BTS-303 Biosystem photometric, Barcelona, Spain). hsCRP was quantified using a turbid metric test (SPINREACT, Spain). Insulin levels were determined using an insulin microplate ELISA test (Monobind, USA).

Metabolic Risk

We calculated a continuous composite metabolic risk score (MRS) by summing standardized residuals (z-score) by age and sex for HOMA score, waist circumference, TG, HDL-c, and systolic blood pressure. These variables are used as criteria for the metabolic syndrome in adults [17] and youth [18]. For calculation of odds ratio for elevated metabolic risk score - “clustered risk” - was defined as 1 SD above the age and sex specific mean, a cut-point used previously in similar studies in youth [1], [2].

Physical Fitness and Physical Activity

Aerobic Capacity was evaluated in groups using a maximum incremental indirect field test [19], as previously reported [20]. In brief, the test requires participants to run “shuttles” back and forth between two lines 20 m apart, in time with an audible “bleep” signal starting at an initial speed of 8.0 km.h–1, a speed which is a brisk walk or slow jog for most children. After one minute of shuttles at this pace the audible signal changes to alert participants to the beginning of the next “level” and an increase in speed. Participants were encouraged to run for as long as possible, but allowed to ‘drop out’ of the test at any time if they felt unable to continue or to maintain the pace. They were also told that their test would be terminated if they failed to reach the line in time for the bleep on two consecutive shuttles.

Muscular strength was measured with a Takei analogue handgrip dynamometer (Takei T.K.K.5001 Grip A Dynamometer, Takei Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd. Niigata-City, Japan). Pupils were given a brief demonstration and verbal instructions for the test and if necessary the dynamometer was adjusted according to the child’s hand size. The test was done in the standing position with the wrist in the neutral position and the elbow extended children were given verbal encouragement to ‘squeeze as hard as possible’ and apply maximal effort for at least 2 seconds. Two trials were allowed in each limb and the highest score recorded as peak grip strength (kg). To account for differences in body size, peak grip strength was divided by body mass and HG/kg was used in further analysis. Children also completed the PAQ-C physical activity questionnaire, a 7-day recall tool which provides an estimate of overall physical activity based on self-reported sporting activities, school lunchtimes, physical education classes as well as after school and weekend activity and has reasonable validity in this age group [21].

Statistical Analysis

Analysis of the variables and measures studied was done using STATA (version 11.2, StataCorp 2009. Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP). Means and SD by sex for anthropometric variables, fitness and blood measures were calculated. For analysis of difference by sex, student t test or Mann Whitney test were used for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables. We estimated the partial correlations between handgrip strength or cardiorespiratory fitness and individual CV and metabolic risk factors and MRS, adjusted for sex, age and pubertal stage. To assess the independence of the associations between the two types of fitness and metabolic risk factors we adjusted handgrip strength for CRF in a second model and in a third model, CRF was adjusted for handgrip strength. To evaluate differences in metabolic risk across quartiles of handgrip ANOVA was used with analysis of linear trend using Kruskal–Wallis tests. We further examined the association between handgrip strength and individual risk factors and MRS using robust multiple linear regression with HG adjusted for age, sex, maturation and CRF in all participants and then separately in children dichotomized by %body fat. We divided participants into normal fat (1st and 2nd third of % body fat) and high fat (upper 3rd of body fat %) groups. Robust logistic regression was then used to estimate odds ratios for risk of having clustered metabolic risk according to quartile of handgrip strength in the whole group and then in boys and girls separately.

Results

Descriptive statistics for girls and boys are shown in table 1. Absolute handgrip strength was not significantly difference between boy and girls but boys had significantly higher scores in handgrip/kg body mass (p = 0.003), cardiorespiratory fitness (p<0.001) and self-report physical activity level (p<0.001). Girls had significantly higher % body fat but boys had significantly higher WC (p = 0.005), BMI and significantly fewer were classified as normal weight (p = 0.041). The prevalence of overweight and obesity did not differ by sex. Boys had significantly higher SBP (p<0.012), girls had significantly higher Insulin (p<0.001), HOMA Index (p<0.002) and triglycerides (p = 0.048) but composite metabolic risk score was not significantly different (p = 0.708). There was no significant difference in anthropometric or fitness variables between the 546 children with blood measures compared to the 123 who did not.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Characteristics of population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.t001

Partial correlations between handgrip strength (HG), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and CVD risk factors are shown in Table 2. In model 1, adjusted for age, sex and maturation status and physical activity both HG and CRF were inversely associated with BP, HOMA index and metabolic risk score (p<0.001 for all associations). HG but not CRF was also inversely associated with triglycerides and CRP (both p<0.05). After additionally adjusting for CRF (model 2), associations between HG and individuals markers and metabolic risk score (MRS) were only marginally weakened and all remained significant (p<0.001 for DBP and MRS; p<0.05 for all other associations). Associations between CRF and DBP, HOMA and MRS were substantially weakened after adjusting for HG (model 3) but remained significant (p<0.05 for all). Due to the stronger and more robust associations between HG and metabolic risk compared to CRF in the partial correlations, further exploration of interactions were conducted with HG only. Individual risk factors and MRS across age and sex-specific HG quartiles are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. We found significant negative linear trends for HG and triglycerides (p<0.001), HOMA index (p<0.001), SBP (p = 0.027) and DBP (p<0.001) and MRS (p<0.001), a marginally non-significant (p = 0.065) trend for CRP and there was no association with HDL-C (p = 0.917).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Metabolic risk factors according to quartile of handgrip strength in 8–14 year old children (n = 536).

Quartile 4 is the highest HG category. Handgrip quartiles are age and sex specific handgrip/kg body mass. Linear trend evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Metabolic risk score according to quartile of handgrip strength in 8–14 year old children (n = 536).

Quartile 4 is the highest HG category. Handgrip quartiles are age and sex specific handgrip/kg body mass. Linear trend evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis test. Metabolic risk score is summed standardized residuals (z-score) by age and sex for HOMA score, waist circumference, TG, HDL-c, and systolic blood pressure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Partial correlations between handgrip or cardiorespiratory fitness and risk factors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.t002

Interactions between Handgrip Strength, Body Composition and Risk Factors

Linear regression analyses with HG adjusted for age, sex, pubertal stage and CRF (Table 3) revealed inverse associations with SBP (β = −0.101; p = 0.047), DBP (β = −0.241; p<0.001), HOMA (β = −0.164; p = 0.005), triglycerides (β = −0.583; p = 0.026), CRP (β = −0.183; p = 0.037) and MRS (β = −10.34; p<0.001) but not glucose (p = 0.698) or HDL cholesterol (p = 0.132). The same regression analysis was applied to the group dichotomized into normal or high % body fat groups. In the high fat group, HG was inversely associated with HOMA index (p = 0.027), CRP (p = 0.011), SBP (p = 0.022) and DBP (p = 0.004) and MRS (p<0.001), but there were no significant associations between HG and risk factors in the normal fat group.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Association between handgrip strength/kg body mass and metabolic risk factors in 8–14 year old children.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.t003

We then examined the risk of having clustered metabolic risk across quartiles of HG in the weakest fourth (quartile 1) compared with the reference highest strength quartile (quartile 4). The odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, sex, and maturation status (Figure 3, Panel A) was 3.0 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.81–4.95) in Q1 compared with Q4, a trend little affected by adjusting for CRF, OR 2.43 (CI 1.41–4.17). After further adjusting for % body fat category (Figure 3, Panel B), the odds ratio for clustered risk in the weakest quartile compared with the strongest (referent) quartile was no longer significant both in CRF-unadjusted OR 1.58 (CI 0.87–2.86) and CRF-adjusted OR 1.45 (CI 0.78–2.69), models. We performed the same regression on the boys and girls separately (Figure 4) and found elevated risk of clustered metabolic risk OR 2.69 (CI 1.1–6.68) in boys (Panel A) in Q1 compared with Q4 but not in girls (panel B) OR 0.97 (CI 0.42–2.22). Again, neither of these trends were substantially affected by adjusting for CRF; in boys OR 2.55 (CI 0.99–6.54) or in girls OR 0.91 (CI 0.38–2.14).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. Handgrip strength quartiles and risk of clustered metabolic risk in 8–14 year old children (n = 536).

Quartile 4 is highest handgrip strength category (used as referent). Handgrip quartiles are age and sex specific handgrip/kg body mass unadjusted (grey bars) or adjusted for cardiorespiratory fitness (white bars). Clustered risk is defined as 1 SD above the age and sex specific mean. Panel A: Adjusted for Odds ratios (95% CI) for clustered metabolic risk by HG across quartiles in 8–14 year olds (n = 546) age, sex, and maturation status. Panel B: Additionally adjusted for % body fat category.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.g003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Handgrip strength quartiles and risk of clustered metabolic risk in 8–14 year old girls (Panel A, n = 306) and boys (Panel B, n = 330).

Quartile 4 is highest handgrip strength category (used as referent). Adjusted for age, maturation status and % body fat category (grey bars) and additionally for cardiorespiratory fitness (white bars). Clustered risk is defined as 1 SD above the age and sex specific mean.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150.g004

Discussion

The present study examined interactions between field measures of muscular strength (handgrip strength) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and metabolic risk factors in Colombian schoolchildren. Handgrip strength (HG) was inversely associated with triglycerides and C-reactive protein, DBP, HOMA index and metabolic risk score and remained so after adjusting for CRF. CRF was also inversely associated with HOMA index, DBP and metabolic risk score but these associations were substantially weakened after adjusting for HG. Youth in the lowest strength quartile were at three times as likely to have elevated metabolic risk than those in the highest strength quartile.

To our knowledge the present study is the first to examine interactions between metabolic risk and both muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness in Latin American children or in a pediatric population of a low to middle income country per se. This may explain why although our findings broadly confirm previous data in European youth [1]–[4] in showing that both muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with better cardio-metabolic health; there is a notable difference. We observed stronger associations between HG and cardio-metabolic risk factors than between CRF and these markers, the opposite of the pattern reported in European youth. Partial correlations between HG and risk factors such as HOMA and triglycerides were very similar to these studies [1], [2] but they additionally found inverse associations between CRF and triglycerides and total Cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol, which we did not observe. Moreover, in contrast with our analysis these studies found that adjusting for HG did not substantially weaken relationships between CRF and metabolic risk.

We found negative linear trends across HG-z score quartiles for triglycerides, HOMA index and DBP, CRP and SBP and adjusted for sex, age, maturation and CRF. Regression analysis in the whole group showed inverse associations between HG/kg and SBP, DBP, HOMA index, triglycerides, CRP and metabolic risk score. However, in regression analysis with the group divided by % body fat, associations between HG/kg and HOMA index, CRP, DBP and metabolic risk score were only found in the children and adolescents with higher % body fat (Table 3). This observation is somewhat consistent with previous studies in European schoolchildren in which adiposity was defined by BMI. Ruiz et al [23] found an association between low HG and higher CRP in overweight/obese children but not in the normal weight and Steene-Johannssen et al [2] found a stronger association between strength and metabolic risk in the overweight compared to normal weight.

The similar methodology, age group and sample size as in the previous studies in European children suggest that ethnic and/or regional differences may be underlie the discrepant findings regarding the strength of associations between CRF versus HG and metabolic risk. Indeed, interactions between ethnicity, region and cardiovascular risk factors have been reported in 10–11 year old children [24], [25], but interactions with physical fitness have not been examined. While interactions between muscle strength, CRF and risk factors have not been previously reported in Latin American children, Bergmann et al. [12] did observe strong inverse relationships between CRF and several metabolic risk factors in Brazilian schoolchildren. These associations appear to be more consistent with those reported in the European studies than that of the present study, but the inclusion of private as well as public schoolchildren in the study also suggests that the sample was of higher social status than the present sample. Perhaps the greater associations between muscle strength and metabolic risk compared to CRF may relate more to the poorer social conditions of our sample rather than regional or ethnic differences. Indeed, in a sample of rural 7–15 year olds in Mozambique, a low income country, dos Santos et al. [13] found no association between CRF and a composite metabolic syndrome score. Lower birth weight, a marker of poorer intra-uterine conditions, and inadequate current nutritional status are both more prevalent in lower socio-economic status communities within low-middle income countries such as Colombia. Low birth weight is associated with lower muscle strength and muscle mass [26] and with alterations in muscle morphology [27] but not with independent deficits in CRF [28] or mitochondrial capacity [29]. Indeed, lower birth-weight was associated with significantly lower HG but higher aerobic fitness in Brazilian children [30]. Low birth weight is also associated with impaired PI3/Akt signalling pathway in skeletal muscle, affecting both with insulin resistance and deficits muscle mass/performance and providing a potential link between the two [31].

In Colombian schoolchildren of similar social status as the present sample, Arsenault et al. [32] found that poorer current micronutrient status was associated with worse performance in the standing long jump, a measure of lower body strength. In Brazilian adolescents from an area with low-middle human development index, 64.6% achieved expected standards for CRF, while only 1.5% attained standards for muscle strength/endurance performance [33]. Amongst 4–6 year old Senegalese children, chronic under-nutrition was associated with significantly lower handgrip strength, but endurance test performance did not differ according to chronic nutritional status [34]. Therefore, both poor current or early life nutrition appear to be more consistently associated with persistent deficits in muscle mass and performance than in CRF, which in turn may contribute to the stronger relative diagnostic value of HG in populations such as the present.

In a sub-analysis of the 28% of the present sample for whom birth weight data was available (N = 213), there does appear to be a stronger association between HG/kg and metabolic risk in the low birth weight schoolchildren (<2800 gm at full term; N = 27, r = −0.599, p = 0.002) than in those with normal birth weight (>2800 gm at full term; N = 186, r = −0.383, p<0.001). However, further research is needed to confirm this exploratory analysis in a larger sample and to evaluate interactions between fitness and metabolic risk score in normal versus low birth weight youth or adults. We did not undertake a complete assessment of current nutritional status, but we do have measures of both albumin and ferritin in the majority of the current sample (N = 526). Partial correlations between HG/kg and metabolic risk score were significant across tertiles of serum albumin (T1: r = −0.406, p<0.001; T2: r = −0.400, p<0.001; T3: r = −0.285, p<0.001) and serum ferritin (T1: r = −0.286, p<0.001; T2: r = −0.391, p<0.001; T3: r = −0.408, p<0.001), with little variation in r values. While it does not appear that current nutritional status modulates the association between HG and metabolic risk, studies with a more comprehensive evaluation of current nutritional status are needed to more robustly evaluate this hypothesis. International studies that include populations from developed and developing countries are needed to further examine interactions between region/ethnicity, birth weight, nutritional status, fitness and cardio-metabolic risk factors.

Potential Mechanisms

The mechanisms underlying the association between muscular strength and cardio-metabolic risk in children remain to be established [2]. These benefits may be mediated by associations between strength and CRF [6] or physical activity [35], both well established as factors associated with better cardio-metabolic health [36]. We also found a moderate correlation between CRF and HG/kg (r = 0.42, p<0.001). However, partial correlations between HG/kg and metabolic risk (Table 2) were only marginally affected by adjusting for CRF, suggesting that in the present population the pathways mediating this association are independent from CRF. Physical activity levels does not appear mediate explain findings as HG/kg was not associated with PAQ score (r = 0.071, p = 0.07). This is consistent with a previous study, which found no association between HG/kg and objectively measured moderate-vigorous PA [37]. However, it is also plausible that HG is associated with participation in specific sub-types of physical activity or sports that we did not quantify.

A potential explanation for the inverse association between strength and HOMA index in particular, relates to HG/kg a marker of muscle mass. However, while muscle mass was reported to be an independent predictor of insulin sensitivity in normal weight Indian men [38], Lee et al found no association between the two variables in obese boys [39]. Moreover, we found that while raw HG was strongly associated with lean body mass (0.7, p<0.001) HG/kg was not. HG/kg was however positively associated with % lean mass (r = 0.6, p<0.001) (and inversely with % body fat), suggesting that the cardio-metabolic benefits of HG/kg might relate to its association with body composition, rather than muscle mass per se. Indeed, in girls adjusting for % body fat category eliminated the elevated risk of clustered metabolic risk associated with low HG/kg (Figure 3, Panel A). However, this was not the case in boys (Figure 3, Panel B), for whom the cardio-metabolic benefits associated with adequate HG/kg are not explained by its associations with body composition. Further work is needed to define the mechanisms by which HG/kg is associated with lower metabolic risk.

Limitations

Due to the cross-sectional nature of our study, we cannot infer a causal association between low strength and cardio-metabolic risk. Strength training however has been shown to improve components of metabolic risk such as insulin sensitivity [40], [41] in overweight youth, although equivalent studies in normal weight youth or low-middle income populations are lacking. Another potential weakness of our study is that the evaluation of fitness using indirect field measures rather than with “gold standard” laboratory measures such as one repetition maximum strength testing or assessment of VO2 max for CRF. Nonetheless, the field measures we used are reliable and valid [42], were used in previous studies of these interactions [1]–[3] and have the advantage that they can feasibly be implemented on a large scale in schools [10], [20]. Finally, our sample included only social classes one to three on a scale of one to six (one is the lowest) and our findings might not be generalizable to middle-upper class Colombian schoolchildren. Nonetheless, over 85% of Colombians are in social classes 1–3, and is therefore representative of the social conditions under which the large majority of youth in the country live [43].

Conclusions

Surveillance of chronic NCD risk factors is justified on the basis that trends in modifiable risk factors can predict future disease patterns [15]. Low strength in adolescence associated with poorer current cardio-metabolic health, predicts higher cardiovascular risk in young adulthood [44] and CV and total mortality in adulthood [45]. Based on evidence such as this, it is argued that fitness measures should be included in European youth health surveillance [11]. Our findings suggest that in Latin American children the accuracy of the classification of cardio-metabolic risk profile in non-invasive health surveillance would also be enhanced by inclusion of HG assessment.

The greater diagnostic value of strength compared to cardiorespiratory fitness in this sample deserves attention and should be confirmed in similar populations. Future research should also aim to evaluate whether a greater emphasis on physical activity that develops strength is warranted for youth in low-middle income countries.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the ACFIES children and the parents and teachers at the INEM Custodio Garcia Rovira, without whom this study would not have been possible. We would also like to thank Schools of Bacteriology, Nursing and Physiotherapy of the University of Santander (UDES), for their participation in data collection. DG-A is grateful to the Colombian Department of Science, Technology and Innovation (Colciencias) as a recipient of their “Young Researcher” grant to support his work. DDC is grateful to Dr. Bill Bukowski for travel support.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DDC PL-J DG-A CH JD. Performed the experiments: SP DG-A. Analyzed the data: PAC DC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JT-S. Wrote the paper: DDC PL-J.

Citation: Cohen DD, Gómez-Arbeláez D, Camacho PA, Pinzon S, Hormiga C, Trejos-Suarez J, et al. (2014) Low Muscle Strength Is Associated with Metabolic Risk Factors in Colombian Children: The ACFIES Study. PLoS ONE 9(4): e93150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093150

References

1. Artero EG, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Espana-Romero V, Vicente-Rodriguez G, et al. (2011) Muscular and cardiorespiratory fitness are independently associated with metabolic risk in adolescents: the HELENA study. Pediatric Diabetes. 12: 704–12.

2. Steene-Johannessen J, Anderssen SA, Kolle E, Andersen LB (2009) Low muscle fitness is associated with metabolic risk in youth. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 41: 1361–7.

3. Martinez-Gomez D, Gomez-Martinez S, Ruiz JR, Diaz LE, Ortega FB, et al. (2012) Objectively-measured and self-reported physical activity and fitness in relation to inflammatory markers in European adolescents: the HELENA Study. Atherosclerosis 221: 260–7.

4. Benson AC, Torode ME, Singh MA (2006) Muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with higher insulin sensitivity in children and adolescents. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity 1: 222–31.

5. Trudeau F, Shephard RJ, Arsenault F, Laurencelle L (2003) Tracking of physical fitness from childhood to adulthood. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology. 28: 257–71.

6. Ruiz JR, Sui X, Lobelo F, Morrow JR Jr, Jackson AW, et al. (2008) Association between muscular strength and mortality in men: prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 337: a439.

7. Tomkinson GR, Olds TS (2007) Secular changes in pediatric aerobic fitness test performance: the global picture. Medicine and Sport Science. 50: 46–66.

8. Tremblay MS, Shields M, Laviolette M, Craig CL, Janssen I, et al. (2010) Fitness of Canadian children and youth: results from the 2007–2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Reports. 21: 7–20.

9. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, España-Romero V, Artero EG, Ortega FB, et al. (2011) Field-based fitness assessment in young people: the ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for children and adolescents. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 45: 518–24.

10. Cohen DD, Voss C, Taylor MJ, Stasinopoulos DM, Delextrat A, et al. (2010) Handgrip strength in English schoolchildren. Acta Paediatrica. 99: 1065–72.

11. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M (2008) Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. International Journal of Obesity (London). 32: 1–11.

12. Bergmann GG, Bergmann ML, Hallal PC (2013) Independent and Combined Associations of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Fatness with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Brazilian Youth. Journal of Physical Activity & Health. Jan 30. [Epub ahead of print].

13. dos Santos FK, Gomes TN, Damasceno A, Prista A, Eisenmann J, et al. (2013) Physical activity, fitness and the metabolic syndrome in rural youths from Mozambique. Annals of Human Biology. 40: 15–22.

14. Artero EG, Lee DC, Lavie CJ, España-Romero V, Sui X, et al. (2012) Effects of muscular strength on cardiovascular risk factors and prognosis. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention. 32: 351–8.

15. Ng N, Van Minh H, Juvekar S, Razzaque A, Huu Bich T, et al. (2009) Using the INDEPTH HDSS to build capacity for chronic non-communicable disease risk factor surveillance in low and middle-income countries. Global Health Action. s1: 17–18.

16. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH (1976) Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 51: 170–179.

17. Alberti KG, Zimmet P, Shaw J (2005) IDF Epidemiology Task Force Consensus Group (2005) The metabolic syndrome–a new worldwide definition. Lancet. 366: 1059–62.

18. Zimmet P, Alberti G, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, et al. (2007) The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Lancet. 369: 2059–61.

19. Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J (1988) The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. Journal of Sports Sciences. 6: 93–101.

20. Sandercock GRH, Voss C, Cohen D, Taylor MJ, Stasinopoulos DM (2012) Centile curves and normative values for the twenty metre shuttle-run test in English schoolchildren. Journal of Sports Sciences. 30: 679–87.

21. Janz KF, Lutuchy EM, Wenthe P, Levy SM (2008) Measuring activity in children and adolescents using self-report: PAQ-C and PAQ-A. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 40: 767–72.

22. Barlow SE (2007) Expert Committee (2007) Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 120 Suppl 4S164–92.

23. Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Wärnberg J, Moreno LA, Carrero JJ, et al. (2008) Inflammatory proteins and muscle strength in adolescents: the Avena study. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. 162: 462–8.

24. Whincup PH, Gilg JA, Papacosta O, Seymour C, Miller GJ, et al. (2002) Early evidence of ethnic differences in cardiovascular risk: cross sectional comparison of British South Asian and white children. British Medical Journal. 324: 635.

25. Nightingale CM, Krishnaveni GV, Rudnicka AR, Owen CG, Veena SR, et al. (2012) Cardiometabolic risk markers in Indian children: comparison with UK Indian and white European children. PLoS One. 7: e36236.

26. Dodds R, Denison HJ, Ntani G, Cooper R, Cooper C, et al. (2012) Birth weight and muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 16: 609–15.

27. Jensen CB, Storgaard H, Madsbad S, Richter EA, Vaag AA (2007) Altered skeletal muscle fiber composition and size precede whole-body insulin resistance in young men with low birth weight. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 92: 1530–4.

28. Ridgway CL, Brage S, Anderssen S, Sardinha LB, Andersen LB, et al. (2011) Fat-free mass mediates the association between birth weight and aerobic fitness in youth. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. 6: e590–6.

29. Brøns C, Jensen CB, Storgaard H, Alibegovic A, Jacobsen S, et al. (2008) Mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle is normal and unrelated to insulin action in young men born with low birth weight. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 93: 3885–92.

30. Moura-Dos-Santos M, Wellington-Barros J, Brito-Almeida M, Manhães-de-Castro R, Maia J, et al. (2013) Permanent deficits in handgrip strength and running speed performance in low birth weight children. American Journal of Human Biology. 25: 58–62.

31. Jensen CB, Martin-Gronert MS, Storgaard H, Madsbad S, Vaag A, et al. (2008) Altered PI3-kinase/Akt signalling in skeletal muscle of young men with low birth weight. PLoS One. 3: e3738.

32. Arsenault JE, Mora-Plazas M, Forero Y, Lopez-Arana S, Jáuregui G, et al.. (2011) Micronutrient and anthropometric status indicators are associated with physical fitness in Colombian schoolchildren. British Journal of Nutrition. 1: 1–12. [Epub ahead of print].

33. Petroski EL, da Silva AF, Rodrigues AB, Pelegrini A (2011) [Health-related physical fitness in Brazilian adolescents from areas having a medium/low Human Development Index]. Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 13: 219–28.

34. Bénéfice E, Fouére T, Malina RM (1999) Early nutritional history and motor performance of Senegalese children, 4–6 years of age. Annals of Human Biology. 26: 443–55.

35. Aadahl M, Beyer N, Linneberg A, Thuesen BH, Jørgensen T (2011) Grip strength and lower limb extension power in 19–72-year-old Danish men and women: the Health 2006 study. BMJ Open. 1: e000192.

36. Fogelholm M (2010) Physical activity, fitness and fatness: relations to mortality, morbidity and disease risk factors. A systematic review. Obesity Reviews. 11: 202–21.

37. Martinez-Gomez D, Welk GJ, Puertollano MA, Del-Campo J, Moya JM, et al. (2011) Associations of physical activity with muscular fitness in adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 21: 310–7.

38. Unni US, Ramakrishnan G, Raj T, Kishore RP, Thomas T, et al. (2009) Muscle mass and functional correlates of insulin sensitivity in lean young Indian men. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 63: 1206–12.

39. Lee S, Kim Y, White DA, Kuk JL, Arslanian S (2012) Relationships between insulin sensitivity, skeletal muscle mass and muscle quality in obese adolescent boys. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 66: 1366–8.

40. Davis JN, Gyllenhammer LE, Vanni AA, Meija M, Tung A, et al. (2011) Startup circuit training program reduces metabolic risk in Latino adolescents. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 43: 2195–203.

41. Shaibi GQ, Cruz ML, Ball GD, Weigensberg MJ, Salem GJ, et al. (2006) Effects of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in overweight Latino adolescent males. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 38: 1208–15.

42. Ruiz JR, Castro-Piñero J, España-Romero V, Artero EG, Ortega FB, et al. (2010) Field-based fitness assessment in young people: the ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for children and adolescents. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 45: 518–24.

43. CONPES (Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social República de Colombia, Departamento Nacional de Planeación) (2005) Plan de acción para la focalización de los subsidios para servicios públicos domiciliarios. Documento:3386 Available: http://www.dane.gov.co/files/dig/CONPES_3386_oct2005_Focaliz_subsidios_servicios_publicos.pdf. Accessed 2013 Aug 17.

44. Grøntved A, Ried-Larsen M, Møller NC, Kristensen PL, Froberg K, et al. Muscle strength in youth and cardiovascular risk in young adulthood (the European Youth Heart Study). British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013 Mar 23.

45. Ortega FB, Silventoinen K, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F (2012) Muscular strength in male adolescents and premature death: cohort study of one million participants. British Medical Journal. 345: e7279.s.