(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)
Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan 1 and Nancy Zhao 1 and Laurie Mereu 1 and Peter A. Senior 1 and Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan 2
1, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, B139 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada
2, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada
Received 16 March 2014; Accepted 1 April 2014; 28 April 2014
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
There are some errors on page 2 with the cut-off score for MCI based on MoCA score.
Under Methodology, in the last paragraph--5th line, there is an error, "A MoCA score of 26 or less is considered as MCI" which should read as "A MoCA score of less than 26 (25 or less) is considered as MCI." Under Statistical Analysis--line 9, there is another error, scores "...4;26" which should be "<26," and, in Tables 3 and 4, the error is "total score (...4;26)" which should be "(<26)."
Table 3: Abnormal scores on different domains of MoCA in both middle-aged (50-64 years) and elderly (...5;65 years) patients with and without MCI by the European consortium criteria.
Abnormal score on domains | European consortium criteria | P value | |
MCI present ( n = 15 ) | MCI absent ( n = 15 ) | ||
Total score (<26) | 7 (46.7%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0.04 |
Visuo spatial | 8 (53.3%) | 6 (40%) | 0.46 |
Language | 8 (53.3%) | 4 (26.7%) | 0.14 |
Attention and calculation | 6 (40%) | 2 (13.3%) | 0.22* |
Abstraction | 6 (40%) | 3 (20%) | 0.43* |
Memory | 13 (86.7%) | 10 (66.1%) | 0.39* |
Orientation | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | -- |
Clock drawing | 6 (40%) | 2 (13.3%) | 0.22 |
With discrete variable, the differences in the proportions were tested by chi-square tests except that *Fisher's exact test was used to test the differences in the attention and calculation, abstraction, and memory.
Table 4: Abnormal scores on different domains of MoCA in the middle-aged (50-64 years) patients with and without MCI by the European consortium criteria.
Abnormal score on MoCA | European consortium criteria | P value* | |
MCI present ( n = 11 ) | MCI absent ( n = 11 ) | ||
Total score (<26) | 4 (36.4%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0.31 |
Visuo spatial | 4 (36.4%) | 3 (27.3%) | 1.00 |
Language | 5 (45.5%) | 6 (54.6%) | 1.00 |
Attention and calculation | 4 (36.4%) | 1 (9.1%) | 0.31 |
Abstraction | 6 (54.6%) | 3 (27.3%) | 0.39 |
Memory | 10 (90.9%) | 7 (63.6%) | 0.31 |
Orientation | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | -- |
Clock drawing | 3 (27.2%) | 2 (18.2%) | 1.0 |
* The differences in the proportions were tested by Fisher's exact test.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2014 Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan et al. Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.) Kannayiram Alagiakrishnan 1 and Nancy Zhao 1 and Laurie Mereu 1 and Peter A. Senior 1 and Ambikaipakan Senthilselvan 2 1, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta Hospital, B139 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada 2, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada Received 16 March 2014; Accepted 1 April 2014; 28 April 2014 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer