Complete Suppression of the Gut Microbiome Prevents Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Abstract

The hypothesis that elimination of facultative and strict anaerobic microorganisms from the gastro-intestinal tract by antimicrobial drugs in the period of time around allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) prevents acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), was examined in a cohort of 112 children grafted between 1989 and 2002 for hematological malignancies. All patients received T-cell replete marrow from human leukocyte antigens (HLA) matched sibling donors under identical transplantation conditions. To eliminate microorganisms from the gastro-intestinal tract, total gastro-intestinal decontamination (GID) was applied by high doses of non-absorbable antimicrobial drugs while the graft recipient was maintained in strict protective isolation. About half of the children (51%) proved to be successfully decontaminated, and about half (49%) unsuccessfully. One recipient got acute GVHD in the first group and 8 in the second group (p = 0.013). The degree of success of total GID was decisive for the occurrence of acute GVHD, irrespective of the presence of other risk factors such as higher age of recipient and/or donor, female donor for male recipient and carriership or reactivation of herpesviruses. Our results demonstrate that successful total GID of the graft recipient prevents moderate to severe acute GVHD. We suppose that substantial translocation of gastro-intestinal microorganisms or parts of these, functioning as microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMP's), triggering macrophages/dendritic cells via pattern recognizing receptors (PRR's) is prohibited. As a consequence the initiation and progression of an inflammatory process leading to acute GVHD is inhibited.

About the Authors:

Jaak M. Vossen

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Harry F. L. Guiot

Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Arjan C. Lankester

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Ann C. T. M. Vossen

Affiliation: Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Robbert G. M. Bredius

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Ron Wolterbeek

Affiliation: Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Hanny D. J. Bakker

Affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Peter J. Heidt

Affiliations Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Rijswijk, The Netherlands

Introduction

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Despite more efficient prevention, e.g. by optimizing human leukocyte antigens (HLA) matching between donor and recipient with high-resolution DNA typing and by improved pharmacological prophylaxis, e.g. with methotrexate (MTX) together with cyclosporin A (CsA), the frequency of ≥ grade II acute GVHD remains between 20 and 30% in children following a T-cell replete allogeneic BMT for a hematological malignancy [1]–[3]. T cell depletion of the graft is an efficient method to avoid the occurrence of acute GVHD; the reverse effect of such graft manipulation is a delayed immune recovery, with a greater risk of opportunistic infections and of relapse of the malignancy. As an alternative for T cell depletion, evidence has been provided in both laboratory animals and humans that complete suppression of the intestinal microorganisms by antimicrobial drugs reduces the occurrence of acute GVHD, besides preventing endogenous bacterial and fungal infections in the immediate post-BMT period [4]–[8].

Acute GVHD is considered a succession of inflammation and donor T-cell activation [9]. The assumed initiators of the inflammatory reaction are whole microorganisms or parts of bacteria and yeasts which may translocate through the mucosal barrier of the intestinal tract as a result of increased permeability after myelo-ablative conditioning of the graft recipient. Based on animal experiments and our earlier retrospective study, we initiated the present study, the aim of which was to evaluate whether successful complete suppression of the intestinal tract microorganisms of the host using total gastro-intestinal decontamination (GID) during the period between the start of conditioning until about one month after allogeneic BMT prevented acute GVHD. For that purpose we analyzed a homogeneous cohort of children with a hematological malignancy who consecutively received a T-cell replete BMT from an HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD) following myelo-ablative conditioning. Also the possible relation between bacterial and fungal infections post-BMT, as well as of the seropositivity for and infection with DNA-viruses and the occurrence of acute GVHD was investigated.

Patients and Methods

Patients

All patients were treated according to the protocols and guidelines of the Dutch Childhood Leukemia Study Group (DCLSG) which were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center. Written consent for participation in the DCLSG protocols was obtained from the parents or guardians. Co-consent was obtained from patients ≥12 years of age.

The study cohort consisted of 119 children with a hematological malignancy who were transplanted consecutively with T-cell replete bone marrow from a MSD in the period from January 1^st, 1989 to January 1^st, 2002. All patients were similarly treated in strict protective isolation and received non-absorbable antimicrobial drugs orally for total GID (see below), the effect of which was controlled by careful microbiological surveillance. The patients were homogeneous with respect to conditioning, composition of the graft and pharmacological GVHD prophylaxis.

Seven patients were excluded from evaluation, either because of insufficient microbiological data (n = 2) or because they died before 50 days after BMT due to other causes than GVHD (n = 5) (see further). The total number of evaluable cases thus was 112. The characteristics of these patients are given in Table 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Characteristics of the BMT recipients and donors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.t001

BMT procedure

All children were pretreated with a myelo-ablative conditioning regimen according to the then current guidelines of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). This consisted of a combination of chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg IV, total dose, with the addition of cytosin-arabinoside or VP-16 in some cases) and TBI (unfractionated, 7 Gy×1, 7.5 Gy×1, 8 Gy×1 or 6 Gy×2, according to age) in children above 2 years of age; younger children were given busulfan (20 mg/kg orally, total dose) or busulfex (16 mg/kg IV, total dose) instead of TBI, and cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg IV, total dose). They received a T-cell replete bone marrow graft from a MSD.

GVHD prophylaxis consisted of MTX-short course (10 mg/kg/day IV at days +1, +3 and +6 (and in some cases +11) plus CsA (2 mg/kg/day IV until engraftment, and 6 mg/kg/day orally thereafter until 180 days after BMT) in all patients.

Gnotobiotic measures and antimicrobial drugs

All graft recipients were nursed in a strict protective environment from 2 weeks before until about 1 month after BMT, using either a laminar down-flow isolator or an ultra- clean room in combination with aseptic nursing techniques and sterilization of food, beverages and all other items brought into the isolation facility, as described before [10]. During consolidation or maintenance chemotherapy for leukemia before admission, most children were given antimicrobials for selective suppression of potentially pathogenic.

Enterobacteriaceae and yeasts (selective GID) and co-trimoxazole for Pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis. After entering the strict protective isolation facility an inventory of the potentially pathogenic microorganisms, colonizing the skin, nose, throat and gut was made, after which the graft recipients received high doses of non-absorbable antimicrobial drugs orally for the non-selective i.e. total suppression of the gastro- intestinal microorganisms (total GID), from day -10 until day +30 (in some later cases ≥+20) after BMT. The combinations of antimicrobial drugs, administered per os were, besides amphotericin B (2000 mg dd), gentamycin (800 mg dd) plus cefaloridin (2000 mg dd), from 1988 to August 1993 for patients ≥20 kg body weight [11]. Thereafter, first- generation cephalosporins were no longer available and were replaced by second- generation cephalosporins i.e. cefuroxime or ceftriaxone IV in therapeutical dosage or by vancomycin per os (1000 mg dd). From 1995 onwards piperacillin/tazobactam was given per os (900 mg dd) for patients ≥20 kg body weight. The daily doses were divided over 3 to 4 gifts per day. For patients <20 kg body weight half of the daily doses was administered. After discontinuing total GID, recontamination was done by per oral administration of Biogarde (starter culture for dairy products containing.

Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus termophilus strains; kindly supplied by Cargill Texturizing Solutions, Deutschland GmbH, Bönen, Germany) and an exclusively anaerobic human intestinal donor flora [12], during 5 days. Ganciclovir or foscarnet was only administered pre-emptively when CMV pp65- antigenemia was detected. Documented infections were treated with appropriate antimicrobial drugs. No systemic antimicrobial drugs were given prophylactically until discharge, after which co-trimoxazole prophylaxis was restarted.

Microbiological surveillance and documentation of infections

Swabs from nose, throat and (if indicated) skin, and samples from stool were taken twice weekly during the period from 10 days before until 30 days after BMT. The target microorganisms were all facultative anaerobic and strictly anaerobic microorganisms of the gastro-intestinal tract. Therefore, routine bacteriological and mycological cultures from the swabs were performed, and semi-quantitative cultures from the stool samples were made using a serial 1∶10 dilution in brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth, followed by inoculating the dilutions on selective media to isolate and identify facultative anaerobic gut microorganisms, serving as indicators for the effect of GID, i.e. Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus faecalis and Candida spp. The detection limit of this technique was estimated to be 102 miroorganisms/g feces [13]. Also other facultative anaerobic bacteria e.g. Pseudomonas spp., coagulase-positive and -negative staphylococci and yeasts, mostly contaminating the intestinal tract, were traced.

Strictly anaerobic bacteria were not cultured as a routine. In order to get an impression of their presence and heterogeneity in the feces, Gram stains were made of all fecal samples and investigated microscopically.

Bacteremia and severe bacterial and fungal organ infections were defined as the combination of signs and symptoms of an infection plus a positive culture of potentially pathogenic bacteria or yeasts using routine microbiological laboratory techniques; for the detection of fungal lesions in organs high-resolution CT (HR-CT) scan was used.

The serostatus of the Herpesviridae at the time of BMT was determined in graft recipients and donors by serology for HSV, VZV, CMV and EBV using standard techniques, i.e. HSV IgG and VZV IgG (until 1998) by immunofluorescence, for CMV, EBV and VZV IgG (from 1998) by ELISA. The serostatus was not routinely investigated pre-BMT for HHV-6 and adenoviruses (HAdV) because of the universal presence of these viruses in the human population. In order to trace infection/reactivation of these DNA-viruses, and to allow for pre-emptive treatment with antiviral drugs, following diagnostic tests were done in the recipient at regular intervals. Pp 65-antigenemia in blood leucocytes was determined weekly in case of CMV-seropositivity of either recipient or donor; ≥1 pp 65-positive leucocytes per 50.000 blood leucocytes was the criterium of CMV-infection [14], as was the isolation of the virus from a throat swab or urine culture. HAdV infection was defined as a positive culture of feces, throat swab or urine taken once in 1-2 weeks during the observation period [15]. EBV infection was diagnosed by the detection of EBV antigens in blood lymphocytes in cases with suspicious signs and symptoms such as fever, lymph node swelling and hepato-splenomegaly [16]. Real-time PCR to detect the above-mentioned DNA-viruses and determine their load in blood samples was not yet routinely available during the study period of 1989 to 2002. HSV- or VZV-disease was confirmed by culture of a sample taken from a typical lesion of a mucous membrane or the skin.

Variables evaluated

The primary goal of this study was to judge whether successful suppression of the intestinal microorganisms by total GID reduced the occurrence of acute GVHD, diagnosed and graded according to standard criteria [17], in the T-cell replete BMT setting. To evaluate the efficacy of total GID, the minimum number of fecal samples to be investigated during the period between day – 10 and +30 had to be 5, of which at least 2 samples had to be obtained before the day of BMT (day 0), and at least 3 after day 0. In 2 cases less than 5 samples were obtained during that period; they were excluded from evaluation (see before). Total GID was considered successful when in the critical period from 10 days before until 30 days after BMT none of the bacterial or fungal species, as mentioned before, could be cultered in ≥3 stool samples [8]. Additional goals of this study were to trace the possible effect on the occurrence of acute GVHD of microbiologically documented severe infections, i.e. bacteremia, fungemia and severe organ infections, taking place between BMT and 50 days after BMT, and of the serological status for Herpesviridae of the host and the donor before BMT. Also the possible coherence of infections/reactivations with CMV, EBV and HAdV and of HSV- and VZV-disease with acute GVHD was investigated.

Moreover, other variables, known from clinical studies to possibly affect the occurrence of acute GVHD, such as age of donor and recipient and female donor for male recipient [18] were included in the evaluation.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out by the IBM-SPSS 20 statistical package. P-values less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank tests were used for categorical predictors. The occurrence of acute GVHD and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) after transplantation were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests. For OS, death was the event of interest, and for RFS, relapse of the malignancy or death. Five-year survival rates for OS and RFS were compared with the Z-test for normal distributions. Possibly confounding variables such as age of donor and recipient and female donor for male recipient within the two groups (successful vs. unsuccessful) of total GID, were compared with median tests and χ² tests. The evaluation cut-off point was January 1^st, 2003. The median follow- up of survivors was 3.90 years (range 0.16–13.73).

Results

Success or failure of total GID

The median number of stool samples, investigated microbiologically during the period of −10 to +30 days, was 9 (range 5–13) per individual patient. Total GID was successful, according to the criteria described in the methods, in 57/112 (51%) graft recipients and was a failure in 55/112 (49%) graft recipients. The microorganisms that caused these failures were Candida spp. (n = 32), coagulase negative staphylococci (n = 7), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 5), and a combination of 2 of these microorganisms (n = 9); in 2 patients Pseudomonas spp. persisted together with one or more of the formerly mentioned microorganisms. Systemic treatment with fluconazole, or an other azole-drug, for the elimination of persisting Candida spp. from the gastro-intestinal tract was only effective in a quarter of the colonized graft recipients.

Relation between effectiveness of total GID and occurrence of acute GVHD

The number of graft recipients that developed acute GVHD after BMT was very low, i.e. _9/112 (8%). Eight children developed grade I GVHD according to the criteria of Przepiorka et al. (17), i.e. only involvement of the skin. One patient got grade II (skin stage 2, gut stage 1, and liver stage 2). None of the patients died as a result of acute GVHD. The cumulative probability of acute GVHD in relation to the success or failure of total GID is shown in Figure 1.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Frequency of acute GVHD (any grade) following BMT in successfully and not successfully decontaminated children with hematologic malignancy (p = 0.013).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.g001

Successful total GID resulted in significantly less acute GVHD (p = 0.013; log-rank test). The only case with grade II GVHD occurred in the group of patients with unsuccessful total GID.

Severe bacterial and fungal infections and possible relation with occurrence of acute GVHD

A total of 12 severe infections were observed in 9 graft recipients; 6 patients had one infectious episode and 3 patients experienced 2 infectious episodes (see Table 2). When restricting the documentation of infections to the period of total GID and strict protective isolation, i.e. from day 10 before to day 30 after BMT, the number of infections was 9, of which 6 occurred in patients with a failure of total GID and 3 in patients with successful total GID. In one patient from whom a coagulase negative Staphylococcus was isolated from the blood, the total GID was a failure due to the persistence of this microorganism in the stool. In the other cases with a severe infection the causative microorganism could be cultured once or more from one of the sampling sites within the period between BMT and 30 days after BMT with the exception of Bacillus cereus which was only cultured from the blood once. None of the severe infections was lethal. One out of 4 patients with failed total GID and severe infection got grade I acute GVHD versus none out of 5 with successful total GID and a severe infection. Altogether, no correlation was found between severe bacterial and fungal infections and the occurrence of acute GvHD.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Severe bacterial and fungal infections after BMT and relation to acute GVHD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.t002

HSV, VZV, CMV and EBV serostatus in recipients and donors before BMT and infection/reactivation of DNA-viruses, or disease with DNA-viruses after BMT in relation to occurrence of acute GVHD

The serological status for HSV, VZV, CMV and EBV of graft recipients and their donors is given in Table 3. There is no correlation between the negative serostatus of the BMT couples versus other serostatus combinations and the occurrence of acute GVHD. Also seropositivity for increasing numbers of herpesvirus types, both in the graft recipient and the donor, did not augment the risk for acute GVHD (Figure 2). As far as could be observed all infections were reactivations of DNA-viruses carried by the host. EBV-related disease did not occur in this patient population. The other DNA- viruses reactivated (CMV, HAdV) or caused disease (HSV, VZV) 44 times during the observation period from BMT to day 50 after BMT (Table S1). Because some patients suffered from more than one virus reactivation or disease, the total number of cases was 39. Of these 39 patients, 5 got acute GVHD versus 4 out of 73 cases without virus reactivation (p = 0.173; χ² test). Thus, reactivation of or disease with endogenous DNA-viruses was not associated with an increased risk for acute GVHD.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. Frequency of acute GVHD (any grade) in relation to serostatus for herpesviruses of donor (A) and recipient (B) following BMT (p = 0.404 and p = 0.706, respectively).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. HSV-, VZV-, CMV- and EBV- serological status of donor and recipient before BMT and relation to acute GVhD at day 50 post BMT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.t003

Other transplant-related variables possibly influencing the occurrence of acute GVHD

Transplant-related variables found in different studies to affect the occurrence and severity of acute GVHD adversely are increasing age of donor and recipient and female donor for male recipient [18]. Also in this study, using univariate analysis and χ² test, a significant lower frequency of acute GVHD was found in younger patients than in older patients, and a significant higher frequency of acute GVHD occurred in the combination female donor to male recipient versus other combinations (Table S2). These variables may confound the results of the success or failure of total GID on the occurrence of GVHD. Because the number of events (9 acute GVHD in 112 cases) was too small for multivariate analysis, the potential for confounding was assessed by comparing the distribution of these variables over the two total GID groups, i.e. successful versus unsuccessful, using a non- parametrical test (independent samples median test) for the variable age and the Pearson's χ² test for the variable sex of donor and recipient (Table 4). No statistically significant difference of the distribution of possibly confounding variables over the two total GID groups was found.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. Distribution of possibly confounding transplant-related variables within two subgroups of patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.t004

Transplant-related mortality, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS)

Five patients died shortly after BMT, i.e. between day +18 and +43 post-BMT. The causes of death were lethal Stevens-Johnson syndrome (n = 1), capillary leakage + veno- occlusive disease (VOD) (n = 3) and invasive aspergillosis (n = 1). They were excluded from evaluation of the effect of total GID on acute GVHD. The RFS and OS were evaluated in the 112 graft recipients included in this study: 48 patients relapsed of their disease before January 1^st, 2003; 47 patients died, 43 as a result of recurrence of their disease and 4 due to transplantation related problems other than GVHD. RFS at 5 years post-BMT was 52.3% for successfully decontaminated patients and 61.3% for not successfully decontaminated patients (p = 0.356; Z-test for normal distributions), and OS at 5 years post-BMT was 52.4%, respectively 63.1% (p = 0.267; Z-test for normal distributions).

Discussion

Absence or elimination of the intestinal microorganisms prevents infections and acute GVHD, even in histoincompatible transplants. This was documented in germfree and decontaminated mouse models, [4], [5], [19], a beagle model [6] and a rhesus monkey model [7]. The first studies of the possible effect of GID in man were performed in children (retrospective) [20] and adults (prospective) [21], transplanted for severe aplastic anemia. GID had a clear beneficial effect on the frequency of acute GVHD in these patients. From retrospective studies by the Essen BMT-group [22] and our group [8] suppression of the strictly anaerobic gut microorganisms together with the facultative anaerobic gut microorganisms, i.e. total GID, was superior in reducing acute GVHD as compared to selective GID, leaving many strictly anaerobic strains intact. The Seattle BMT-group did not succeed in reproducing such a beneficial effect when grafting adult patients with leukemia [23], but compliance with oral non-absorbable antimicrobial drugs was low and the effect of GID on the quality and quantity of the intestinal microorganisms was not investigated. The Essen BMT-group compared in a prospective open-label study two regimens of antibiotics for decontamination of adult BMT patients with a hematological malignancy. They found significantly less ≥ grade II acute GVHD in the patients whose strictly anaerobic gut flora was also suppressed, besides the facultative anaerobic gut flora [24].

The study described here is a retrospective evaluation of the effect of successful versus unsuccessful GID on the occurrence of acute GVHD in a homogeneous cohort of children, consecutively treated with an allogeneic T-cell replete BMT for a hematological malignancy. The division into two arms to be compared was done ex post on grounds of success or failure of total GID. Our data demonstrate that successful suppression of facultative and strictly anaerobic bacteria, and yeasts in the gut prevents the occurrence of acute GVHD. It supports our long-standing hypothesis that the most prominent role in initiating the process leading to acute GVHD is played by intestinal bacteria and yeasts or their components [11], which translocate following damage of the intestinal barrier caused by the conditioning [25]–[28]. These components are recognized as microbial-associated molecular patterns (MAMP's) by pattern recognizing receptors (PRR's) (e.g. TLR's) on macrophages/DC's and initiate an inflammatory process in the gut [29]–[31].

In our setting of BMT under gnotobiotic conditions, i.e. total GID in strict protective isolation, severe infections with bacteria and yeasts are rare [8]. No relationship was found between severe infections and the occurrence of acute GVHD. Literature data on a possible relationship between carriage of herpesviruses by donor or recipient and the occurrence and severity of acute GVHD, are ambiguous [32]–[35].

Although there is some indication of a relationship between seropositvity for an increasing number of herpes virus types and more acute GVHD (see Figures 2A and 2B), and strikingly, the absence of acute GVHD in either seronegative donors or recipients, the differences are not significant. Despite that the question may be raised whether the relationship between increasing age and increasing frequency of GVHD [18], as also found in this study, is not merely a reflection of an amplified stage of T-cell priming by an accumulating carriership of DNA-viruses, associated with increased alloreactivity [36]. Reports on a possible relation between virus infections/reactivations and acute GVHD are controversial [37], [38]. Some persistent DNA- viruses reactivate and may cause disease early, i.e. within 50 days after T-cell replete BMT, e.g. HHV6, HSV and to some extent CMV. Others, e.g. CMV and VZV do so later. HAdV and EBV do not cause disease in the T-cell replete BMT setting, when no serotherapy is used [15], [16]. With the restriction that we did not use RT-PCR technology routinely in our patient population, a causative relationship between virus infections/reactivations and acute GVHD was not found in this study. The opposite seems to be the case: viral infections/reactivations and disease occur at the nadir of immune competence, including during GVHD and its treatment [39].

In conclusion, our study supports the hypothesis that successful suppression of the intestinal microbiome of the bone marrow graft recipient from 10 days before until 30 days after BMT prevents the occurrence of ≥ grade II GVHD. Our results indicate that even unsuccessful total GID may have a beneficial effect on the occurrence of acute GVHD. This should be further investigated with the recently developed molecular biological technology to study the composition of the intestinal microbiome.

Figure 3 depicts the chain of events that will result in the destruction of epithelial cells, defined as acute GVHD. It is adapted, as a result of our findings, to the circle of phases according to Ferrara cs. [9]. The fixed sequential events are: 1) translocation of microbial components in the gastro-intestinal tract following damage (conditioning), 2) inflammation with secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages/DC's, 3) activation of lymphocytes (proliferation, production of cytokines) and 4) recognition and destruction of target cells by donor-derived T lymphocytes. In our opinion peptidoglycans, present in the cell wall of strictly anaerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria and yeasts, are the obvious instigators of the process [40]. Following translocation through the gut epithelium, the barrier function of which has been damaged by the conditioning, their MAMP's are recognized by receptors on macrophages/DC's and they stimulate these cells to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. There is no evidence from experimental data that LPS plays a role in triggering GVHD; LPS rather amplifies GVHD by increasing cytokine release [41]. Daily oral feeding of different (increasing) dosages of endotoxin to germfree mouse recipients of H2-incompatible bone marrow cells from the day of transplantation until day 30 after transplantation did not result in GVHD (P.J. Heidt, unpublished observation), while also systemic administration of endotoxin to recipients in a murine model of BMT did not aggravate the process of GVHD [41]. Polymorphisms of PRR's and intracellular molecules recognizing microbial determinants such as Toll-like receptors (TLR's) and NOD-like receptors (NLR's) may modulate the severity of the inflammation, as described in GVHD [42]–[44] and in other inflammatory intestinal diseases.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. Schematic representation of sequential events, cells and products concerned with acute GVHD following allogeneic BMT.

DC, EC, MC,MØ, SC: dendritic cell, epithelial cell, microfold cell, macrophage, stem cell. IFN, IL, TGF, TNF: interferon, interleukin, T-cell growth factor, tumor necrosis factor. MAMPS, MHC, PRR: microbial-associated molecular patterns, major histocompatibility complex, pattern recognizing receptor.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.g003

Figure 3 also shows the possible preventive or therapeutical measures that may be taken to reduce the risk of occurrence or worsening of acute GVHD. When leaving T cells in the graft, which has an advantage for immune recovery, and possibly suppresses recurring leukemia, total GID seems the most powerful measure because it may prevent, in a harmless way, the ignition of the inflammatory process leading to GVHD. Spacing TBI and BMT may reduce GVHD mortality as shown in experimental H2-incompatible mouse models [45]. Also tempering of the inflammation, e.g. by blockade of IL-1 or TNF-α may theoretically be effective in controlling acute GVHD [46], but pre-emptive use of IL-1 antagonist in a prospective randomized clinical trial did not show an advantage over placebo [47] and probably needs further adjustments.

Suppression of the intestinal microbiome seems to be an independent factor in GVHD prophylaxis, irrespective of any other possible risk factors, including selection of the donor on the basis of age, sex and serostatus of persistent viruses. Further studies of the intestinal microbiome, e.g. with ribosomal DNA sequencing [48], may throw more light on relevant microbial substances for the ignition of the GVHD process.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table S1.

Infection with HSV, VZV, CMV and HAdV after BMT and relation to acute GVHD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.s001

(DOCX)

Table S2.

Relationship between possibly confounding transplant-related variables and acute GVHD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contribution of the nurses and other staff members of the pediatric HSC Transplant Center Leiden. They are grateful for the skillful contribution of Y. van der Kwast, secretary, H Oudshoorn, microbiological technician, and for the artwork (figures) of H.J. van Westbroek.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JMV PJH. Performed the experiments: JMV PJH HFLG ACL ACTMV RGMB. Analyzed the data: RW HDJB. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: JMV PJH ACL ACTMV RGMB.

Citation: Vossen JM, Guiot HFL, Lankester AC, Vossen ACTM, Bredius RGM, Wolterbeek R, et al. (2014) Complete Suppression of the Gut Microbiome Prevents Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation. PLoS ONE 9(9): e105706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105706

References

1. Leung WH, Turner V, Richardson SL, Benaim E, Hale G, et al. (2001) Effect of HLA class I or class II incompatibility in pediatric marrow transplantation from unrelated and related donors. Human Immunol 62: 399–407.

2. Martin P, Bleyzac N, Souillet G, Galambrun C, Bertrand Y, et al. (2003) Clinical and pharmacological risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease after paediatric bone marrow transplantation from matched-sibling or unrelated donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 32: 881–887.

3. Auletta JJ, Cooke KR (2009) Bone marrow transplantation: new approaches to immunosuppression and management of acute graft-versus-host disease. Curr Opin Pediatr 21: 30–38.

4. Jones JM, Wilson R, Bealmear PM (1971) Mortality and gross pathology of secondary disease in germfree mouse radiation chimeras by modification of the intestinal microflora. Radiat Res 45: 577–580.

5. van Bekkum DW, Roodenburg J, Heidt PJ, van der Waaij D (1974) Mitigation of secondary disease of allogeneic mouse radiation chimeras by modification of the intestinal microflora. J Natl Cancer Inst 52: 401–404.

6. Vriesendorp HM, Heidt PJ, Zurcher C (1981) Gastrointestinal decontamination of dogs treated with total body irradiation and bone marrow transplantation. Exp Hematol 9: 904–916.

7. Heidt PJ, Wagemaker G, Timmermans CPJ, de Groot CW, van Bekkum DW (1996) Influence of gastrointestinal decontamination on graft-versus-host disease in rhesus monkeys after (partially) mismatched allogeneic bone marow transplantation. Microecol Ther 22: 89–106.

8. Vossen JM, Heidt PJ, van den Berg H, Gerritsen EJ, Hermans J, et al. (1990) Prevention of infection and graft-versus-host disease by suppression of intestinal microflora in children treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 9: 14–23.

9. Ferrara JL, Levine JE, Reddy P, Holler E (2009) Graft-versus-host disease. Lancet 373: 1550–1561.

10. Vossen JM, van der Waaij D (1972) Reverse isolation in bone marrow transplantation: ultra-clean room compared with laminar flow technique. I. Isolation systems. Rev Eur Etud Clin Biol 17: 457–461.

11. Vossen J, Heidt P (1990) Gnotobiotic measure for the prevention of acute graft-vs.-host disease. In: Burakoff S, Ferarra J, Deeg H, Atkinson K, editors. Graft-vs.-host disease: Immunology, pathophysiology and treatment. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 403–413.

12. Heidt P, van der Waaij D, Vossen J, Hendriks W (1981) Recontamination following antibiotic decontamination: restoration of colonization resistance. Microecol Ther 11: 71–82.

13. Blom M, Meyer A, Gerner-Smidt P, Gaarslev K, Espersen F (1999) Evaluation of Statens Serum Institut enteric medium for detection of enteric pathogens. J Clin Microbiol 37: 2312–2316.

14. Kalpoe JS, Kroes ACM, de Jong MD, Schinkel J, de Brouwer CS, et al. (2004) Validation of clinical application of cytomegalovirus plasma DNA load measurement and definition of treatment criteria by analysis of correlation to antigen detection. J Clin Microbiol 42: 1498–1504.

15. van Tol MJ, Kroes AC, Schinkel J, Dinkelaar W, Claas EC, et al. (2005) Adenovirus infection in paediatric stem cell transplant recipients: increased risk in young children with a delayed immune recovery. Bone Marrow Transplant 36: 39–50.

16. Gerritsen E, Stam E, Hermans J, van den Berg H, Haraldsson A, et al. (1996) Risk factors for developing EBV-related B cell lymphoproliferative disorders (BLPD) after non-HLA-identical BMT in children. Bone Marrow Transplant 18: 377–382.

17. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann H, Beatty P, et al. (1995) 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 15: 825–828.

18. Gale R, Bortin M, van Bekkum D, Biggs J, Dicke K, et al. (1987) Risk factors for acute graft-versus-host disease. Br J Haematol 67: 397–406.

19. Heit H, Wilson R, Fliedner T, Kohne E (1973) Mortality of secondary disease in antibiotic treated mouse radiation chimeras. In: Heneghan J, editor. Germfree research: biological effects of gnotobiotic environments. New York: Academic Press pp. 477–483.

20. Vossen J, Heidt P, Guiot H, Dooren L (1981) Prevention of acute graft versus host disease in clinical bone marrow transplantation: complete versus selective intestinal decontamination. In: Sasaki S, Osawa A, Hashimoto K, editors. Recent advances in germfree research. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. pp. 573–577.

21. Storb R, Prentice RL, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Appelbaum F, et al. (1983) Graft-versus-host disease and survival in patients with aplastic anemia treated by marrow grafts from HLA-identical siblings. Beneficial effect of a protective environment. N Engl J Med 308: 302–307.

22. Beelen D, Haralambie E, Brandt H, Linzenmeier G, Müller K, et al. (1992) Evidence that sustained growth suppression of intestinal anaerobic bacteria reduces the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease after sibling marrow transplantation. Blood 80: 2668–2676.

23. Storb R, Thomas ED (1985) Graft-versus-host disease in dog and man: the Seattle experience. Immunol Rev 88: 215–238.

24. Beelen D, Elmaagacli A, Müller K, Hirche H, Schaefer U (1999) Influence of intestinal bacterial decontamination using metronidazole and ciprofloxacin or ciprofloxacin aloneon the development of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies: final results and long-term-follow-up of an open-label prospective randomized trial. Blood 10: 3267–3275.

25. Alexander J, Boyce S, Babcock G, Gianotti L, Peck M, et al. (1990) The process of microbial translocation. Ann Surg 212: 496–510.

26. Fegan C, Poynton CH, Whittaker JA (1990) The gut mucosal barrier in bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 5: 373–377.

27. Nejdfors P, Ekelund M, Weström B, Willén R, Jeppsson B (2000) Intestinal permeability in humans is increased after radiation therapy. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 1582–1588.

28. Johansson J, Ekman T (2007) Gut toxicity during hemopoietic stem cell transplantation may predict acute graft-versus-host disease severity in patients. Dig Dis Sci 52: 2340–2345.

29. Medzhitov R (2007) Recognition of microorganisms and activations of the immune response. Nature 449: 819–826.

30. Penack O, Holler E, van den Brink MR (2010) Graft-versus-host disease: regulation by microbe-associated molecules and innate immune receptors. Blood 115: 1865–1872.

31. Murphy S, Nguyen VH (2011) Role of gut microbiota in graft-versus-host disease. Leuk Lymphoma 52: 1844–1856.

32. Gratama JW, Zwaan FE, Stijnen T, Weijers TF, Weiland HT, et al. (1987) Herpes-virus immunity and acute graft-versus-host disease. Lancet 1: 471–474.

33. Boström L, Ringdén O, Sundberg B, Linde A, Tollemar J, et al. (1988) Pretransplant herpesvirus serology and acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 46: 548–545.

34. Broers AE, van Der Holt R, van Esser JW, Gratama JW, Henzen-Logmans S, et al. (2000) Increased transplant-related morbidity and mortality in CMV-seropositive patients despite highly effective prevention of CMV disease after allogeneic T-cell-depleted stem cell transplantation. Blood 95: 2240–2245.

35. Ljungman P, Brand R, Einsele H, Frassoni F, Niederwieser D, et al. (2003) Donor CMV serologic status and outcome of CMV-seropositive recipients after unrelated donor stem cell transplantation: an EBMT megafile analysis. Blood 102: 4255–4260.

36. D'Orsogna LJ, Roelen DL, Doxiadis, II, Claas FH (2010) Alloreactivity from human viral specific memory T-cells. Transpl Immunol 23: 149–155.

37. Wang LR, Dong LJ, Zhang MJ, Lu DP (2008) Correlations of human herpesvirus 6B and CMV infection with acute GVHD in recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 42: 673–677.

38. Cantoni N, Hirsch HH, Khanna N, Gerull S, Buser A, et al. (2010) Evidence for a bidirectional relationship between cytomegalovirus replication and acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 1309–1314.

39. Maltezou H, Kafetzis D, Abisaid D, Mantzouranis E, Chan K, et al. (2000) Viral infections in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19: 307–312.

40. Kaneko T, Goldman W, Mellroth P, Steiner H, Fukase K, et al. (2004) Monomeric and polymeric Gram-negative peptidoglycan but not purified LPS stimulate the Drosophila IMD pathway. Immunity 20: 637–649.

41. Lampert IA, Moore RH, Huby R, Cohen J (1988) Observations on the role of endotoxin in graft-versus-host disease. Prog Clin Biol Res 272: 351–359.

42. Imado T, Iwasaki T, Kitano S, Satake A, Kuroiwa T, et al. (2010) The protective role of host Toll-like receptor-4 in acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 90: 1063–1070.

43. Sivula J, Cordova ZM, Tuimala J, Jaatinen T, Partanen J, et al. (2012) Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms confer susceptibility to graft-versus-host disease in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Scand J Immunol 76: 336–341.

44. van der Velden WJ, Blijlevens NM, Maas FM, Schaap NP, Jansen JH, et al. (2009) NOD2 polymorphisms predict severe acute graft-versus-host and treatment-related mortality in T-cell-depleted haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 44: 243–248.

45. Xun C, Tsuchida M, Thompson J (1997) Delaying transplantation after total body irradiation is a simple and effective way to reduce acute graft-versus-host disease mortality after major H2 incompatible transplantation. Transplantation 64: 297–302.

46. McCarthy PL Jr, Williams L, Harris-Bacile M, Yen J, Przepiorka D, et al. (1996) A clinical phase I/II study of recombinant human interleukin-1 receptor in glucocorticoid-resistant graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 62: 626–631.

47. Antin J, Weisdorf D, Neuberg D, Nicklow R, Clouthier S, et al. (2002) Interleukin-1 blockade does not prevent acute graft-versust-host disease: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 100: 3479–3482.

48. Jenq R, Ubeda C, Taur Y, Menezes C, Khanin R, et al. (2012) Regulation of intestinal inflammation by microbiota following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Exp Med 209: 903–911.