Unmanned Aerial Survey of Fallen Trees in a Deciduous Broadleaved Forest in Eastern Japan

Abstract

Since fallen trees are a key factor in biodiversity and biogeochemical cycling, information about their spatial distribution is of use in determining species distribution and nutrient and carbon cycling in forest ecosystems. Ground-based surveys are both time consuming and labour intensive. Remote-sensing technology can reduce these costs. Here, we used high-spatial-resolution aerial photographs (0.5–1.0 cm per pixel) taken from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to survey fallen trees in a deciduous broadleaved forest in eastern Japan. In nine sub-plots we found a total of 44 fallen trees by ground survey. From the aerial photographs, we identified 80% to 90% of fallen trees that were >30 cm in diameter or >10 m in length, but missed many that were narrower or shorter. This failure may be due to the similarity of fallen trees to trunks and branches of standing trees or masking by standing trees. Views of the same point from different angles may improve the detection rate because they would provide more opportunity to detect fallen trees hidden by standing trees. Our results suggest that UAV surveys will make it possible to monitor the spatial and temporal variations in forest structure and function at lower cost.

About the Authors:

Tomoharu Inoue

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan

Shin Nagai

Affiliation: Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan

Satoshi Yamashita

Affiliation: Department of Forest Entomology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Hadi Fadaei

Affiliation: Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan

Reiichiro Ishii

Affiliation: Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan

Kimiko Okabe

Affiliation: Department of Forest Entomology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Hisatomo Taki

Affiliation: Department of Forest Entomology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

Yoshiaki Honda

Affiliation: Center of Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Koji Kajiwara

Affiliation: Center of Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

Rikie Suzuki

Affiliation: Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan

Introduction

Fallen trees are an ecologically relevant indicator of forest biodiversity [1], since they provide habitat for many species, such as small animals (e.g., birds, mammals, and insects) and fungi [2]–[4]. In addition, the decomposition of fallen trees is an important mechanism driving biogeochemical cycles such as nutrient and carbon cycling [5]–[6]. Thus, information about their spatial distribution is of use in indicating species distribution, biodiversity, and biogeochemical cycles in forest ecosystems [7]–[8]. Fallen trees are typically assessed by field surveys [9]. However, because field surveys are time consuming and labour intensive [10], it is expensive to assess the spatial distribution of fallen trees over a wide area. One way to reduce costs is to use remote-sensing technologies such as airborne and satellite imagery (e.g., [10]–[14]). For example, some studies have utilized the remote-sensing technologies for assessment of post-hurricane forest damage (e.g., [15]–[16]).

Recent advances in the technology of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have made UAVs ideal for remote sensing [17]–[20]. Equipped with sensors such as digital cameras, UAVs can gather aerial photographs with fine spatial and temporal resolution [20]. They also have greater flexibility in flying height and schedule and lower operating costs than manned aircraft [18], [19], [21]. For these reasons, aerial surveys using UAVs have been suggested for low-cost ecological research (e.g., vegetation monitoring and wildlife surveys) [19], [20], [22]–[26].

In this study, we photographed a deciduous broadleaved forest from a UAV, compared the positions of fallen trees identified in the images by eye with those recorded on the ground, and compared the number of the fallen trees detected between the original images and an orthorectified mosaic. The purpose of this study was to show the applicability and limits of this technique.

Materials and Methods

Study site

The study was conducted in a 300-m × 200-m plot in the Ogawa Forest Reserve (OFR) in Kitaibaraki, Ibaraki, Japan (36°56′10″N, 140°35′18″E, 650–700 m above sea level; Figs. 1, 2). The forest was dominated by deciduous broadleaved trees such as oak (Quercus serrata) and beech (Fagus japonica and F. crenata) [27], with a patchy distribution of dwarf bamboos on the forest floor [28]. The OFR is described in detail by Nakashizuka and Matsumoto [29]. This study was conducted including a national forest under the permission of the Ibaraki district forest office of the Forestry Agency in Japan.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 1. Location of the Ogawa Forest Reserve (OFR).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 2. OFR plot (grey area). Yellow squares mark nine sub-plots for ground survey.

Circles indicate UAV photograph points. Circle colour indicates flight altitude.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g002

Collection of low-altitude aerial photographs from a UAV

On 29 November 2011, when the trees were bare, we flew a UAV (RMAX-G1 helicopter, Yamaha-Motor Co. Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan; Fig. 3; a model commonly used in Japan (e.g., [30]–[32])) over the OFR plot at 30 to 70 m above the ground in a north–south orientation at 3 m s^–1. A consumer-grade digital camera with a 35-mm lens (EOS Kiss X5, Canon, Tokyo, Japan; image sensor 14.9 mm × 22.3 mm) mounted beneath the UAV pointing straight down took images (5184 × 3456 pixels) every 5 s. The UAV was also equipped with a global positioning system (GPS) detector that recorded altitude, latitude, and longitude every 0.1 s. The GPS position with the timestamp closest to that of each photograph was used as the position of the UAV.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 3. UAV (RMAX-G1) equipped with a digital camera (EOS KISS X5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g003

Generation of a digital elevation model (DEM)

The UAV was also equipped with a laser range finder (LRF; SkEyesBOX MP-1, SkEyes Unlimited Corp., Washington, PA, USA), which assembled a 3D point cloud. We divided the plot (300 m × 200 m) into 1-m × 1-m cells, and the lowest elevation in each cell was used in the creation of a digital elevation model (DEM) of the site.

Orthorectification and mosaic of aerial photographs

The aerial photographs were orthorectified according to the DEM and the position (longitude and latitude) and attitude (pitch, roll, and heading) of the UAV, and assembled into one mosaic image with the help of “tie points” in overlapping photographs.

Ground survey

On 31 May 2012 in nine 10-m × 10-m sub-plots (Fig. 2), ground observers recorded the position, stem diameters (each end and midpoint) and length of all fallen trees with a diameter of >5 cm. The ground survey was conducted in leafy season because it was easier to check the tree species in the study site when there were leaves on the trees, as opposed to a leaf-off season.

Detection of fallen trees in aerial photographs

Fallen trees were identified by eye in the original aerial photographs on a computer monitor. Positions were compared with those of fallen trees mapped in the ground survey and those identified by eye in the orthorectified mosaic.

Results

The OFR plot was covered by 211 aerial photographs (Fig. 2) with a spatial resolution of 0.5 to 1.0 cm per pixel. Since the trees were bare in late November, fallen trees were visible (Fig. 4). A DEM of the plot was generated from a cloud of 5445612 points (Fig. 5). The DEM showed a valley with an elevation range of 640 m (in the south) to 720 m (in the north). From the DEM and the position of the UAV, an orthorectified mosaic image was generated (Fig. 6).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 4. Close-up image of part of the forest floor.

Two fallen trees are detectable.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 5. Digital elevation model (DEM) of the OFR plot.

This DEM was used for orthorectification of the aerial photographs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g005

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 6. Fallen trees (yellow circles) detected by eye in the orthorectified mosaic.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g006

In the ground survey, we found a total of 44 fallen trees in the sub-plots (Table S1). By eye, however, we identified only 11 fallen trees in the sub-plots on the original images (Table S1). We identified 80% to 90% of fallen trees which were >30 cm in diameter or >10 m in length, but few that were thinner or shorter (Tables 1, 2). Over the whole plot, we detected 244 fallen trees on the original photographs and 209 on the orthorectified mosaic (Fig. 6).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Relationship of maximum diameter between ground-surveyed and visually identified fallen trees.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.t001

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Relationship between lengths of ground-surveyed and visually identified fallen trees.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.t002

Discussion

Because fallen trees are generally defined as being >2.5 cm in diameter [2], we assumed that the high spatial resolution of our aerial photographs (0.5–1.0 cm per pixel) would allow us to detect them. However, our results suggest difficulty in identifying narrow or short fallen trees (Tables 1, 2). This failure may be due to the similarity of fallen trees to trunks and branches of standing trees, and masking of fallen trees by the branches of standing trees and forest floor vegetation. Hodgson et al., who surveyed marine mammals by UAV in Australia, reported the usefulness of overlaps between photographs for detecting animals that are masked by sun glitter [24]. For a similar reason, views of the same point from different angles may provide more opportunity to detect fallen trees hidden by standing trees (Fig. 7). The memory capacity of the camera [24] will determine the balance between coverage and overlap. The optimal degree of overlap will also depend on flying speed, flight altitude, and camera specifications (e.g., frames per second).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Figure 7. Example of overlapping images of the same point taken from different angles.

In this example, the visual detection of three fallen trees from the forward- and backward-looking images may be difficult owing to masking by tree branches (within red boxes). The fallen trees are clearly visible in the nadir-looking image (yellow arrows).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.g007

Another factor contributing to the poor rate of visual identification of fallen trees might be ambiguity in colour. One of the clues we used in detecting fallen trees was the colour of mosses growing on them. Trees with mosses are easy to detect visually, but freshly fallen trees with no mosses might be confused with tree branches or fallen leaves.

The orthorectification and mosaicking of aerial photographs according to the DEM require much labour and time, even for experts, and can also require specialized and expensive software. However, we identified fewer fallen trees from the orthorectified mosaic than from the original photographs. Thus, non-orthorectified photographs of the same point from different angles would allow better identification of fallen trees, at no additional cost, than orthorectified mosaics.

Conclusions

We showed the applicability of aerial photographs captured from a UAV for the detection of large fallen trees in a deciduous broadleaved forest in eastern Japan. Because much tree death is episodic and irregular [33], high-frequency monitoring at multiple points is necessary for the detection of newly fallen trees and for the understanding of species distribution, biodiversity, and nutrient and carbon cycling in forest ecosystems. UAVs now permit high-frequency monitoring at low cost. This approach has great potential for forest ecology, especially for measuring temporal and spatial variations in forest structure and functioning. Furthermore, as UAVs are advancing and the payload of them is increasing, new sensors for forest monitoring on an UAV will become more common in the future [26]. Installation of a multi-angle photographing system, like a PRISM (Panchromatic Remote-sensing Instrument for Stereo Mapping) on-board the Japanese satellite ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite), on an UAV would potentially help to find more opportunity for detection of fallen trees hidden by standing trees and it may increase the accuracy of fallen tree identification.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table S1.

List of the diameters and lengths of fallen trees in the sub-plots.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the administrators of the OFR site of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI) for their cooperation during the field data collection. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and editor for their helpful and constructive comments.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RS SY KK HT SN RI HF KO YH. Performed the experiments: RS SY KK HT SN RI HF KO YH. Analyzed the data: KK RS TI SN HF. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: TI SN RS.

Citation: Inoue T, Nagai S, Yamashita S, Fadaei H, Ishii R, Okabe K, et al. (2014) Unmanned Aerial Survey of Fallen Trees in a Deciduous Broadleaved Forest in Eastern Japan. PLoS ONE 9(10): e109881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109881

References

1. Biała K, Condé S, Delbaere B, Jones-Walters L, Torre-Marín A (2012) Streamlining European biodiversity indicators 2020: Building a future on lessons learnt from the SEBI 2010 process. EEA Tech Rep No.11/2012. doi: 10.2800/55751.

2. Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, et al. (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15: 133–302

3. Bunnell FL, Houde I (2010) Down wood and biodiversity – implications to forest practices. Environ Rev 18: 397–421

4. Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG (2012) Biodiversity in dead wood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

5. Herrmann S, Prescott CE (2008) Mass loss and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in three Rocky Mountain coniferous forests: 21 year results. Can J For Res 38: 125–132

6. Ohtsuka T, Shizu Y, Hirota M, Yashiro Y, Shugang J, et al. (2014) Role of coarse woody debris in the carbon cycle of Takayama forest, central Japan. Ecol Res 29: 91–101

7. Edman M, Jonsson BG (2001) Spatial pattern of downed logs and wood-decaying fungi in an old-growth Picea abies forest. J Veg Sci 12(5): 609–620

8. Wu JB, Guan DX, Han SJ, Zhang M, Jin C (2005) Ecological functions of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystem. J For Res 16: 247–252

9. Ståhl G, Ringvall A, Fridman J (2001) Assessment of coarse woody debris: A methodological overview. Ecol Bull 49: 57–70.

10. Bütler R, Schlaepfer R (2004) Spruce snag quantification by coupling colour infrared aerial photos and a GIS. For Ecol Manage 195: 325–339

11. Meentemeyer RK, Rank NE, Shoemaker DA, Oneal CB, Wickland AC, et al. (2007) Impact of sudden oak death on tree mortality in the Big Sur ecoregion of California. Biol Invasions 10: 1243–1255

12. Chambers JQ, Fisher JI, Zeng H, Chapman EL, Baker DB, et al. (2007) Hurricane Katrina’s carbon footprint on U.S. Gulf Coast forests. Science 318: 1107

13. Kupfer JA, Myers AT, McLane SE, Melton GN (2008) Patterns of forest damage in a southern Mississippi landscape caused by Hurricane Katrina. Ecosystems 11: 45–60

14. Pasher J, King DJ (2009) Mapping dead wood distribution in a temperate hardwood forest using high resolution airborne imagery. For Ecol Manage 258: 1536–1548

15. Wang F, Xu YJ (2010) Comparison of remote sensing change detection techniques for assessing hurricane damage to forests. EnvironMonit Assess 162: 311–326

16. Wang W, Qu JJ, Hao X, Liu Y, Stanturf JA (2010) Post-hurricane forest damage assessment using satellite remote sensing. Agric For Meteorol 150: 122–132

17. Valavanis KP (ed) (2007) Advances in unmanned aerial vehicles: State of the art and the road to autonomy. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

18. Watts AC, Perry JH, Smith SE, Burgess MA, Wilkinson BE, et al. (2010) Small unmanned aircraft systems for low-altitude aerial surveys. J Wildl Manag 7: 1614–1619

19. Watts AC, Ambrosia VG, Hinkley EA (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: Classification and considerations of use. Remote Sens 4: 1671–1692

20. Anderson K, Gaston KJ (2013) Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front Ecol Environ 11: 138–146

21. Rango A, Laliberte A, Herrick JE, Winters C, Havstad K, et al. (2009) Unmanned aerial vehicle-based remote sensing for rangeland assessment, monitoring, and management. J Appl Remote Sens 3: 033542

22. Koh LP, Wich SA (2012) Dawn of drone ecology: low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Trop Conserv Sci 5: 121–132.

23. Sardà-Palomera F, Bota G, Viñolo C, Pallarés O, Sazatornil V, et al. (2012) Fine-scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems. Ibis 154: 177–183

24. Hodgson A, Kelly N, Peel D (2013) Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for surveying marine fauna: a dugong case study. PLoS One 8(11): e79556

25. Vermeulen C, Lejeune P, Lisein J, Sawadogo P, Bouché P (2013) Unmanned aerial survey of elephants. PLoS One 8(2): e54700

26. Getzin S, Nuske RS, Wiegand K (2014) Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to quantify spatial gap patterns in forests. Remote Sens 6: 6988–7004

27. Masaki T, Suzuki W, Niiyama K, Iida S, Tanaka H, et al. (1992) Community structure of a species-rich temperate forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. Vegetatio 98: 97–111

28. Nakashizuka T, Iida S, Tanaka H, Shibata M, Abe S, et al. (1992) Community dynamics of Ogawa Forest Reserve, a species rich deciduous forest, central Japan. Vegetatio 103: 105–112

29. Nakashizuka T, Matsumoto Y (eds.) (2002) Diversity and interaction in a temperate forest community: Ogawa Forest Reserve of Japan. Ecological Studies vol. 158, Springer, Tokyo.

30. Kaneko T, Koyama T, Yasuda A, Takeo M, Yanagisawa T, et al. (2011) Low-altitude remote sensing of volcanoes using an unmanned autonomous helicopter: an example of aeromagnetic observation at Izu-Oshima volcano, Japan. Int J Remote Sens 32: 1491–1504

31. Koyama T, Kaneko T, Ohminato T, Yanagisawa T, Watanabe A, et al. (2013) An aeromagnetic survey of Shinmoe-dake volcano, Kirishima, Japan, after the 2011 eruption using an unmanned autonomous helicopter. Earth Planets Sp 65: 657–666

32. Sanada Y, Kondo A, Sugita T, Nishizawa Y, Yuuki Y, et al. (2014) Radiation monitoring using an unmanned helicopter in the evacuation zone around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Explor Geophys 45: 3–7

33. Franklin JF, Shugart HH, Harmon ME (1987) Tree death as an ecological process: the causes, consequences, and variability of tree mortality. BioScience 37(8): 550–556