ARTICLE
Received 9 May 2014 | Accepted 17 Oct 2014 | Published 27 Nov 2014
Quantum properties of optical modes are typically assessed by observing their photon statistics or the distribution of their quadratures. Both particle- and wave-like behaviours deliver important information and each may be used as a resource in quantum-enhanced technologies. Weak-eld homodyne (WFH) detection provides a scheme that combines the wave- and particle-like descriptions. Here we show that it is possible to observe a wave-like property such as the optical coherence across Fock basis states in the detection statistics derived from discrete photon counting. We experimentally demonstrate these correlations using two WHF detectors on each mode of two classes of two-mode entangled states. Furthermore, we theoretically describe the response of WHF detection on a two-mode squeezed state in the context of generalized Bell inequalities. Our work demonstrates the potential of this technique as a tool for hybrid continuous/discrete-variable protocols on a phenomenon that explicitly combines both approaches.
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584
Observing optical coherence across Fock layers with weak-eld homodyne detectors
Gaia Donati1, Tim J. Bartley1, Xian-Min Jin1,2, Mihai-Dorian Vidrighin1,3, Animesh Datta1, Marco Barbieri1,4 & Ian A. Walmsley1
1 Clarendon Laboratory, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK. 2 Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China. 3 QOLS, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BW, UK. 4 Dipartimento di Scienze, Universit degli Studi Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Rome, Italy. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to G.D. (email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5584 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584
Quantum correlations play a central role in our understanding of fundamental quantum physics and represent a key resource for quantum technologies14. Progress in
quantum information science has followed an increasingly thorough understanding of how such correlations manifest themselves and how they can be successfully generated, manipulated and characterized5. In quantum optical systems, these correlations appear in either properties of the elds, such as quadrature entanglement, or at the level of individual quanta, that is, photons. Access and control over such correlations are key to applications in quantum information science; however, how the complementary mode and particle correlations precisely act as a resource is still a subject of debate6. The capability of studying the correlations in a regime traversing mode and particle aspects is thus necessary for clarifying the origin of quantum enhancement.
When a coherent superposition of many photons occupies a single mode, a wave-like description of the quantum state in terms of continuous variables (that is, the values of the quadratures) of the electromagnetic eld is the standard approach7. The canonical technique for measuring such light elds is strong-eld homodyne detection, which directly probes the quadratures of a eld and can provide a full reconstruction of its quantum state8. On the other hand, particle-like properties can be directly accessed with a range of photodetectors, a notable example being photon-number-resolving detectors (PNRDs)912, and suitable techniques for the reconstruction of the photon statistics13,14. However, such photon counters are intrinsically insensitive to phase, and thus cannot access any coherence between modes. Weak-eld homodyne (WFH) has been proposed as a measurement technique bridging wave- and particle-like descriptions1521. As in standard homodyne, a local oscillator (LO) provides phase sensitivity, while the photon statistics are accessed by number-resolving detectors. The main difference is that WFH makes use of a classical reference whose mean photon number is of a similar order as that of the probed signal; this allows for the combination of the homodyne technique with PNRDs based on photon counting modules.
In this paper, we employ WFH detection to investigate coherence between different photon-number basis states (Fock layers) across two-mode entangled states. Our detection scheme accesses this manifestation of optical coherence directly, without the need for resource-intensive full state tomography. We demonstrate the oscillations of an array of multi-photon coincidence counts when a split single-photon state (SSPS) and a two-mode squeezed state (TMSS) are interfered with a weak LO. Our experiment can be regarded as a rst step towards the quantitative study of the nonlocal properties of multi-mode quantum states with multi-outcome measurements by non-Gaussian detectors. To this end, we theoretically study a violation
of Bell inequalities that can be achieved for low numbers of detected photons under ideal conditions.
ResultsExperiment. The WFH setup is depicted in Fig. 1a. A signal is mixed on a beam splitter with a local oscillator, described by the coherent state |aeifS, which establishes a phase reference. One or both output modes from the beam splitter are then detected using PNRDs. The method is termed weak-eld since the intensity of the LO is comparable to that of the signal. This differs from strong-eld homodyne in which the coherent state is many orders of magnitude more intense than the signal, and the outputs are detected by linear photodiodes.
To understand how WFH can detect coherence across Fock layers, consider the detection of m photons. These can originate from any Fock term |kS in the signal together with m k
photons from the LO; if the complex coefcients of the terms {|kS} have well-dened relative phases, then these result in a modulation of the detection probability p(m) as the phase of the LO is varied. For a two-mode state, the relevant phases are the ones between joint detection events coming from terms in the signal of the form |k1S|k2S. Consequently, coherence across such events can be observed in the modulation of joint detection probabilities.
We use the layout shown in Fig. 1b to study the coherence between Fock layers across the two modes of a split single photon and a squeezed vacuum state. To maximize the passive phase stability of our setup, we adopt a compact design in which the LO and the signal are collinear and occupy two orthogonal polarizations of a single spatial mode. Our PNRDs are time-multiplexed detectors (TMDs) that split an incoming beam into two spatial and four temporal modes, thereby resolving up to eight photons probabilistically using two avalanche photodiodes10,22. Specically, the TMDs allow us to decompose the intensity of the interference patterns resulting from each output mode into its constituent photon components. In this way, we can probe pair-wise correlations between the individual Fock layers as we build up a joint detection statistics matrix, every row and column representing the number of clicks in each detected mode. The click statistics gives us access to higher-order Fock states (kZ1), although this detection scheme is not fully equivalent to a number-resolving detector23.
A split single-photon state may be written as
jCiSSPS
1
2
p j0iA j1iB j1iA j0iB
; 1
which describes a single photon in a coherent superposition of modes A and B (see Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 1 for further details on the experimental layout). The results of our investigation for the SSPS are reported in Fig. 3.
LO
Signal
PNRD
PNRD
[afii9825] [afii9825]e i[p10]
GPR
PBS
PNRD
[p10]
BS
.
.
HWP
[afii9852] [afii9852]
[p10]
Figure 1 | Layout of the WFH detector. (a) The general scheme relies on the interference between a signal and a LO of similar intensity for different settings of the phase f. Either one or both outputs are measured with PNRDs. (b) Our experimental implementation adopts a collinear conguration in which the signal j ci and the LO have orthogonal polarizations. For this reason, the beam splitter in a is replaced by a half-wave
plate (HWP) and a PBS that realize interference in polarization. The phase setting of the LO is controlled by means of a geometric phase rotator (GPR), which consists of a quarter-wave plate (QWP), a HWP and a second QWP. The rotation of the HWP (with both QWP xed at 45) applies a phase shift to the coherent state. A TMD records click events on the transmitted output mode.
WFH
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5584 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 ARTICLE
The red dots show the experimental probabilities P(m, m0) of the joint detection of m clicks in mode A and m0 clicks in mode B. Each P(m, m0) term is a function of the difference between the phase settings of the weak LOs, f( ) fA fB, since a single
photon has no phase per se24,25. Our count rates are such that we only consider events where m, m0r2; detection outcomes greater than this level are negligible. The blue lines are predictions from a model that accounts for the following imperfections in our experiment: non-unit efciency of the detectors; modulation of the reectivities of the beam splitters preceding the TMDs when varying the LO phases (due to the geometric phase rotators depicted in Fig. 1bsee Methods and Supplementary Fig. 2). We
also include imperfections in the production of the single-photon states26, and we thus write
r0 w0 j0ih0j w1 j1ih1j 1 w0 w1j2ih2j; 2 where w0 and w1 are coefcients taken between 0 and 1 that weight the zero- and one-photon contributions to the input state. We experimentally determine these parameters from the photon statistics of the initial state (see Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Note 2).
The experimental curves show oscillations in the coincidence counts: these are evident in the P(1, 1), P(2, 1) and P(1, 2) terms, as also predicted by the theory. What is most striking about the observed oscillatory behaviour is the fact that it is displayed by terms P(m, m0) for which m m041, yet it is determined by the
coherence between the terms |0SA|1SB and |1SA|0SB (see equation (1)), which do not contain more than one photon each. Ideally, any additional photon detected must therefore come from the LOs, hence the SSPS is responsible for the coherent oscillations observed in the considered joint detection probabilities. In practice, we observe good qualitative agreement between the experimental data and our theoretical description. Indeed, we are able to account for all the main features of a 3-by-3 array of multi-photon counts with one model that has no free parameters; detection efciencies and the weights in equation (2) are experimentally determined. We attribute the residual discrepancies to two main factors: imperfect mode matching between the LOs and the signal modes and variations of the laser power during the few-hour-long acquisition.
An analogous experiment is conducted on a TMSS (see Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3 for further details on the experimental layout). This state is archetypal of a quantum resource with
2 2
APD
2
WFH
SSPS
2
HW T
A A
B B
WFH
TMSS
HWP
PBS
WP
HW
BS
HWP
WP
S
1
1
PBS
PBS
WFH
WFH
PDC
PDC
Figure 2 | Probing correlations across optical modes with WFH. (a) A single photon is produced by a heralded source based on parametric downconversion. We then split the single-photon state to generate |CSSSPS
across two separate spatial modes (A and B), both probed by the WFH detectors described in Fig. 1b. (b) The same downconversion source produces the squeezed vacuum state whose two modes are also probed by WFH detectors.
5 104
() (rad)
0.95
0.03
4
P(0,0)
P(1,0)
P(2,0)
0.94
3
0 1
0.02 0 1
0 1
() (rad)
() (rad)
0.035
1
103 105
106
2
P(0,1)
0.03
0.025
P(1,1)
0.5
P (2,1)
1
0.02
0.015 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 1
() (rad)
() (rad)
() (rad)
104
105
1
4
P(0,2)
P(1,2)
1
P(2,2)
0.5
3
2 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 1
() (rad)
() (rad)
() (rad)
Figure 3 | Joint counting statistics for the SSPS. Correlations between the responses of two WFH detectors as a function of the phase difference F( ) f( )/4 (where F( ) is determined by the settings of the half-wave plates in the phase rotators). We recall that P(m, m0) is associated to the
joint detection probability of m photons on mode A and m0 photons on mode B. The red dots are measured probabilities, with uncertainties determined by a Monte Carlo routine under the assumption of a Poissonian distribution for the raw counts. The blue theoretical curves are obtained from amodel that includes the main imperfections in the setup. The dashed curves correspond to an input state with the experimentally determined weights w0 0.161 and w1 0.669. The uncertainties s0 0.011 on w0 and s1 0.029 on w1 are estimated by a Monte Carlo routine; the dotted curves show the
results given by the theoretical model with (w0 s0, w1 s1) and (w0 s0, w1 s1), respectively. The quantum efciencies of the detectors, ZA 0.072
and ZB 0.064, are experimentally estimated with the Klyshko method44,45. The intensities of the two local oscillators are |aA| 0.510 and |aB| 0.585.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5584 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584
0.968
0.018
2.5
104
105
0.966
P(0,0)
0.964
P (1,0)
0.016
P(2,0)
2
0.962
0.014
1.5
0 2
0 2
0 2
(+) (rad)
(+) (rad)
(+) (rad)
104
104 105 106
15
P (1,1)
0.02
3
P(0,1)
10
0.018
P(2,1)
2
5
0.016 0 2
1
0 2
0 2
(+) (rad) (+) (rad) (+) (rad)
4
3
3
P (0,2)
P (1,2)
2
1
2
P(2,2)
1
1 0 2
0 2
0 0 2
(+) (rad)
(+) (rad)
(+) (rad)
Figure 4 | Joint counting statistics for the TMSS. Correlations between the responses of two WFH detectors as a function of the phase sum F() f( )/4 (where F() is determined by the settings of the half-wave plates in the phase rotators). We recall that P(m, m0) is associated to
the joint detection probability of m photons on mode A and m0 photons on mode B. The red dots are measured probabilities, with uncertainties determined by a Monte Carlo routine under the assumption of a Poissonian distribution for the raw counts. The blue theoretical curves are obtained from a model that includes the main imperfections in the setup. The dashed curves correspond to an input state with the experimentally determined squeezing parameter l 0.295 and weight P 0.04 for the additional noise term. The uncertainty s 0.016 on l is estimated by a Monte Carlo
routine; the dotted curves show the results given by the theoretical model with ls. The experimental quantum efciencies of the detectors are ZA
0.132 and ZB 0.155 (estimated with the Klyshko method). The intensities of the two local oscillators are |aA| 0.365 and |aB| 0.347.
0.0
IM
2.5
M
2.0
A
A
A
TM
MSS
TM
MSS
B M
M
1.5
B
[afii9826]
TMSS
1.0
+
0.5
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 M
Figure 5 | Generalized Bell inequalities with WFH. (a) In the ideal case, the two modes of a TMSS are interfered with two weak LOs; PNRDs monitor all four outputs. We x the number of detected photons to M on each side and label the various detection events recorded by the PNRDs according to how the M particles distribute themselves on the two output modes: G, M G, G E and M G E (b) The plot shows the values taken
by the quantity IM (see equation (5)) when the number of detected photons M on each side varies between two and eight. The bound for IM predicted by local realism is two for all values of M, hence we see that no violation of a generalized Bell inequality is possible beyond M 5.
well-known correlations between its Fock layers. The expression for a TMSS reads
jCiTMSS
1 l2
p X
1
n0
ln jniA jniB; 3
where the real squeezing parameter l governs the photon distribution across the photon-number basis states. Here, we pump our source with moderate parametric gain to generate signicant higher-order Fock layers in the two-mode state27. The
expected phase dependence of {P(m, m0)} for a TMSS was shown to be f( ) fA fB (ref. 28). The TMSS has a phase
dependence arising from that of the pump; in a conventional strong homodyne setup this would dene which quadratures are squeezed. In our case, the same effect is manifested in the phase dependence of the click patterns; hence, appropriate phase locking was necessary (see Methods).
The results obtained for the TMSS are illustrated in Fig. 4. Once again, we observe good qualitative agreement between our data and the predictions from a theoretical model that includes the same imperfections as for the single-photon case. Here the input state can be modelled as
r 1 pjCiTMSShCj pj0; 1ih0; 1j; 4
where the extra term is a rst-order approximation of noise in a squeezed thermal state. This asymmetry across the modes is justied by the experimentally recorded g(2) for the parametric downconversion source: we nd g2A 1:98 0:04 and g2B
1:92 0:04 for the two marginals, to be compared with g(2) 2
for an ideal thermal state. The lower value of g2B motivates the addition of the noise term on output mode B. The quoted values of g(2) also suggest that additional (and undesired) Schmidt modes might be responsible for the presence of photons in modes correlated to undetected modes29. As for the case of the SSPS, imperfect mode matching between the LOs and the signal modes and variations of the laser power during the data acquisition are recognized as the main causes of the residual departures of the experimental curves from the expected behaviour in Fig. 4.
As a general remark applying to both classes of studied states, we note that our numerical models depend strongly
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5584 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 ARTICLE
on the detection efciencies (see Supplementary Figs 4 and 5). In this sense, the more pronounced discrepancies in Figs 3 and 4, such as that in the P(0, 2) terms, may be due to noise affecting our estimation of these parameters. More details on the theoretical model for both the SSPS and the TMSS can be found in Supplementary Notes 1 and 2.
Generalized Bell inequalities for WFH detection. Correlations such as those revealed in our experiment need to be understood in relation to canonical criteria for non-classicality, for instance the violation of a Bell inequality, to assess their role as possible quantum resources30. The ability to access and discriminate higher photon numbers leads us to refer to generalized, higher-dimensional Bell inequalities31, which we study theoretically in the context of our experiment with a TMSS.
To this end, let us consider the scenario depicted in Fig. 5. Each mode of a TMSS is analysed by means of a WFH detector; here all four outputs are monitored by perfect PNRDs. We take into account the Fock layers that lead to the detection of M photons on each side: the detected photons are split among the two output ports of the polarizing beam splitters (PBSs) (that is, the photons are either transmitted or reected) according to the convention indicated in Fig. 5a. Specically, we consider measurements with D M 1 possible results, distinguished according to the
number of photons G detected on the transmitted arm of each PBS. We are thus interested in the probabilities associated with joint detection events comprising outcomes (on each output arm, on both sides) differing by E (the outcomes being taken modulo
D). {a, a0} and {b, b0} denote the LO settings on side A and side B, respectively. The relevant probabilities are combined into the expression
IM X
M 1
2 1 P a; b; E
P a0; b; E 1
1
2E M
5
where the local realistic bound is |IM|r2 (ref. 31). We note that the case M 1 corresponds to the standard CHSH inequality
that was experimentally tested in ref. 17. Additional details on how to compute IM for the specic layout that we consider are provided in Supplementary Note 3, Supplementary Figs 6 and 7.
We run a numerical search for values of M ranging from 2 to 8 to nd the set of parameters {l, a, a0, b, b0} that determine the highest violation of these generalized Bell inequalities. Our results are shown in Fig. 5b: no violation of equation (5) is found beyond M 5. This behaviour comes from the fact that the maximal
violation of equation (5) (that is, the attainment of the maximum value allowed by quantum mechanics) relies on a particular structure for the entangled state32. Notably, a TMSS is specied solely by the squeezing parameter l: this means that there are not enough degrees of freedom to tune to obtain the required form for the input state. This restriction becomes more severe as the dimensionality of the system increases, to the point that no violation of local realism can be inferred despite the use of an entangled resource such as a TMSS. Hence the decrease in the violation stems from the Gaussian character of the TMSS, which xes the functional shape of the oscillation curves simultaneously for all Fock layers.
DiscussionWe have shown how WFH can be used to deconstruct phase-dependent measurements on two-mode entangled states into
their constituent Fock layers. The ability to operate devices at the interface of wave and particle regimes opens up new possibilities for quantum information processing33. Thus, our work provides a new insight on such resources within the broader investigations on hybrid continuous/discrete-variable coding3438.
As a complement, we have also studied the theory of the violation of generalized Bell inequalities using an ideal WFH setup. These tests shed light on how the transition from non-Gaussian to Gaussian measurements occurs. Such transition is achieved in the context of WFH detection as an increase in the LO strength. In fact, this study may also be interpreted in the more general framework of Gaussian versus non-Gaussian measurements, where it is well-known that the outcomes of a Gaussian measurement on a Gaussian quantum state can be explained by a local realistic model. For this reason, strong-eld homodyne detection on a TMSS cannot be used to violate a Bell inequality39,40. On the other hand, weak-eld homodyne is an example of non-Gaussian measurement, as attested by its Wigner function. Consequently, we expect that the outcomes of WFH detection on an entangled Gaussian state cannot be described by a local realistic model17,41,42; however, this breaks for moderately high photon numbers.
On the experimental side, further developments for the observation of the violation of higher-dimensional Bell inequalities demand detectors with higher quantum efciency43. These are not only necessary for achieving signicant counting statistics, but also to prevent one Fock layer to be affected from higher-order contributions. Encouraging results have been obtained in this direction with cryogenic detectors.
Methods
Source of quantum states. A pulsed Ti:Sapphire laser (repetition rate 256 kHz, central wavelength lIR 830 nm and bandwidth DlIRC30 nm) is doubled in a
nonlinear crystal (b-barium borate). The second-harmonic beam (lUV 415 nm)
pumps a type-II parametric downconversion process in a nonlinear crystal (potassium dihydrogen phosphate) to produce a two-mode vacuum-squeezed state. The source is designed to generate spectrally uncorrelated modes based on group velocity mismatch inside the birefringent medium27. Daughter photons have orthogonal polarizations and different spectral widths (DlVC12 nm, DlHC6 nm).
The same source generates the SSPS and the TMSS depending on the ultraviolet pump beam brightness.
WFH detection. The detection system that we adopt in our experiment is realized with a collinear geometry to ensure passive phase stability. Each mode in equations(1) and (3) is superposed with a LO of orthogonal polarization at a PBS. This delivers a common spatial mode at the output but orthogonal polarizations for the signal to be probed and the weak coherent beam. Interference is then realized by a half-wave plate and an additional PBS. The relative phase between the horizontal and vertical polarizations can be adjusted by means of a geometric phase rotator (GPRsee Fig. 1b), which is composed of a quarter-wave plate (QWP), a half-wave plate and a second QWP. The axis of the rst QWP is set to 45 to transform the input linear polarizations into circular ones. The rotation of the HWP by an angle f/4 results in a phase shift equal to f between left- and right-circular polarizations.
The initial linear polarizations are then recovered by setting the second QWP to 45. The successful calibration of the full device relies on the characterization of each element (including the PBS), particularly of the QWPs. When the GPR is correctly calibrated power uctuations around 3% are recorded, while imperfections in the calibration of one of its constituents can lead to uctuations in power above 10% (see Supplementary Fig. 2). Finally, the output state is analysed with a TMD: this consists of two bre-based cascaded MachZehnder interferometers that split the incoming state over two spatial modes and four distinct time bins. Time-resolved clicks from avalanche photodiodes monitoring the two transmitted modes are thus registered.
Active phase stabilization. To actively lock the phase set by the GPRs, we use an ancillary laser beam (from a continuous-wave HeNe laser, l0 633 nm), which
back-propagates through the interferometer. The classical interference pattern that we obtain when the ancillary beam reproduces correctly the signal and LO optical paths constitutes the signal recorded by a photodiode connected to a PID device (SRS SIM960 Analog PID Controller).
E0
P a0; b0; E P a; b0; E
P a; b; E 1
P a0; b; E P a0; b0; E 1
P a; b0; E 1
;
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5584 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584
References
1. Schrdinger, E. Die gegenwartige Situation in der Quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften 23, 844849 (1935).
2. Wiseman, H. M., Jones, S. J. & Doherty, A. C. Steering, entanglement, nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007).
3. Modi, K., Brodutch, A., Cable, H., Paterek, T. & Vedral, V. The classical-quantum boundary for correlations: discord and related measures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 16551707 (2012).
4. Silva, I. A. et al. Measuring bipartite quantum correlations of an unknown state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 140501 (2013).
5. Baumgratz, T., Cramer, M. & Plenio, M. B. Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).
6. Demkowicz-Dobrzaski, R., Jarzyna, M. & Kolodyski, J. Quantum limits in optical interferometry. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7703v2
Web End =http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.7703v2 (2014).
7. Braunstein, S. L. & Van Loock, P. Quantum information with continuous variables. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 513577 (2005).
8. Lvovsky, A. I. & Raymer, M. G. Continuous-variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299332 (2009).
9. Divochiy, A. et al. Superconducting nanowire photon-number-resolving detector at telecommunication wavelengths. Nat. Photonics 2, 302306 (2008).
10. Achilles, D. et al. Photon-number-resolving detection using time-multiplexing.J. Mod. Opt. 51, 14991515 (2009).11. Jahanmirinejad, S. et al. Photon-number resolving detector based on a series array of superconducting nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 072602 (2012).12. Calkins, B. et al. High quantum-efciency photon-number-resolving detector for photonic on-chip information processing. Opt. Express 21, 2265722670 (2013).
13. Zambra, G. et al. Experimental reconstruction of photon statistics without photon counting. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 063602 (2005).
14. Allevi, A., Olivares, S. & Bondani, M. Measuring high-order photon-number correlations in experiments with multimode pulsed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 85, 063835 (2012).
15. Wallentowitz, S. & Vogel, W. Unbalanced homodyning for quantum state measurements. Phys. Rev. A. 53, 4528 (1996).
16. Banaszek, K., Radzewicz, C., Wdkiewicz, K. & Krasiski, J. S. Direct measurement of the Wigner function by photon counting. Phys. Rev. A 60, 674 (1999).
17. Kuzmich, A., Walmsley, I. A. & Mandel, L. Violation of Bells inequality by a generalized Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen state using homodyne detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1349 (2000).
18. Resch, K. J., Lundeen, J. S. & Steinberg, A. M. Quantum state preparation and conditional coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 113601 (2002).
19. Puentes, G. et al. Bridging particle and wave sensitivity in a congurable detector of positive operator-valued measures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 080404 (2009).
20. Laiho, K., Cassemiro, K. N., Gross, D. & Silberhorn, C. Probing the negative Wigner function of a pulsed single photon point by point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 253603 (2010).
21. Zhang, L. et al. Mapping coherence in measurement via full quantum tomography of a hybrid optical detector. Nat. Photonics 6, 364368 (2012).
22. Lundeen, J. S. et al. Tomography of quantum detectors. Nat. Phys. 5, 2730 (2009).
23. Sperling, J., Vogel, W. & Agarwal, G. S. Sub-binomial light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 093601 (2012).
24. Babichev, S. A., Brezger, B. & Lvovsky, A. I. Remote preparation of a single-mode photonic qubit by measuring eld quadrature noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 047903 (2004).
25. Morin, O. et al. Witnessing trustworthy single-photon entanglement with local homodyne measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 130401 (2013).
26. Bartley, T. J. et al. Multiphoton state engineering by heralded interference between single photons and coherent states. Phys. Rev. A 86, 043820 (2012).
27. Mosley, P. J. et al. Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 133601 (2008).
28. Blandino, R. et al. Homodyne estimation of Gaussian quantum discord. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 180402 (2012).
29. Mosley, P. J., Lundeen, J. S., Smith, B. J. & Walmsley, I. A. Conditional preparation of single photons using parametric downconversion: a recipe for purity. New J. Phys. 10, 093011 (2008).
30. Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V. & Wehner, S. Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419478 (2014).
31. Collins, D., Gisin, N., Linder, N., Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002).
32. Acn, A., Durt, T., Gisin, N. & Latorre, J. I. Quantum nonlocality in two three-level systems. Phys. Rev. A 65, 052325 (2001).
33. Kiesel, T., Vogel, W., Hage, B. & Schnabel, R. Entangled qubits in a non-Gaussian quantum state. Phys. Rev. A 83, 062319 (2011).
34. Ourjoumtsev, A., Ferreyrol, F., Tualle-Brouri, R. & Grangier, P. Preparation of non-local superpositions of quasi-classical light states. Nat. Phys 5, 189192 (2009).
35. Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S. et al. Optical continuous-variable qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 053602 (2010).
36. Neergaard-Nielsen, J. S., Eto, Y., Lee, C.-W., Jeong, H. & Sasaki, M. Quantum tele-amplication with a continuous-variable superposition state. Nat. Photonics 7, 439443 (2013).
37. Jeong, H. et al. Generation of hybrid entanglement of light. Nat. Photonics 8, 564569 (2014).
38. Morin, O. et al. Remote creation of hybrid entanglement between particle-like and wave-like optical qubits. Nat. Photonics 8, 570574 (2014).
39. Gilchrist, A., Deuar, P. & Reid, M. D. Contradiction of quantum mechanics with local hidden variables for quadrature phase amplitude measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3169 (1998).
40. Garca-Patrn, R. et al. Proposal for a loophole-free Bell test using homodyne detection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 130409 (2004).
41. Bjrk, G., Jonsson, P. & Snchez-Soto, L. L. Single-particle nonlocality and entanglement with the vacuum. Phys. Rev. A 64, 042106 (2001).
42. Hessmo, B., Usachev, P., Heydari, H. & Bjrk, G. Experimental demonstration of single photon nonlocality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 180401 (2004).
43. Eisaman, M. D., Fan, J., Migdall, A. & Polyakov, S. V. Single-photon sources and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011).
44. Klyshko, D. N. Observable signs of nonclassical light. Phys. Lett. A 213, 715 (1996).
45. Achilles, D., Silberhorn, C. & Walmsley, I. A. Direct, loss-tolerant characterization of nonclassical photon statistics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 043602 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to J. Spring and A. Eckstein for helping with the detection setup, and thank L. Zhang, B. Smith, M.S. Kim and M. Paternostro for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the EPSRC (EP/K034480/1, EP/H03031X/1, EP/H000178/1), the EC project SIQS and the Royal Society. X.-M.J. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11374211) and an EC Marie Curie fellowship (PIIF-GA-2011-300820). A.D. is supported by the EPSRC (EP/K04057X/1).
Author contributions
G.D. performed the experiments and, with assistance from A.D., M.B. and M.-D.V., analysed the data and investigated the application of WFH to generalized Bell inequalities. G.D. and T.J.B., with assistance from M.B., X.-M.J. and M.-D.V., designed the experimental layout. T.J.B., M.B. and I.A.W. conceived the experiment. G.D., T.J.B., A.D. and M.B. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors. All authors agree to the contents of the article.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interest.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Donati, G. et al. Observing optical coherence across Fock layers with weak-eld homodyne detectors. Nat. Commun. 5:5584 doi: 10.1038/ncomms6584 (2014).
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5584 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6584 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
& 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Nov 2014
Abstract
Quantum properties of optical modes are typically assessed by observing their photon statistics or the distribution of their quadratures. Both particle- and wave-like behaviours deliver important information and each may be used as a resource in quantum-enhanced technologies. Weak-field homodyne (WFH) detection provides a scheme that combines the wave- and particle-like descriptions. Here we show that it is possible to observe a wave-like property such as the optical coherence across Fock basis states in the detection statistics derived from discrete photon counting. We experimentally demonstrate these correlations using two WHF detectors on each mode of two classes of two-mode entangled states. Furthermore, we theoretically describe the response of WHF detection on a two-mode squeezed state in the context of generalized Bell inequalities. Our work demonstrates the potential of this technique as a tool for hybrid continuous/discrete-variable protocols on a phenomenon that explicitly combines both approaches.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer