Exosomes as Hedgehog carriers in

Full text

Turn on search term navigation

ARTICLE

Received 31 Jan 2014 | Accepted 22 Oct 2014 | Published 4 Dec 2014

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

Exosomes as Hedgehog carriers in cytoneme-mediated transport and secretion

Ana-Citlali Gradilla1, Esperanza Gonzlez2,*, Irene Seijo1,*, German Andrs1,*, Marcus Bischoff3, Laura Gonzlez-Mendez1, Vanessa Snchez1, Ainhoa Callejo1, Carmen Ibnez1, Milagros Guerra1, Joao Ramalho Ortigao-Farias1, James D. Sutherland2, Monika Gonzlez2, Rosa Barrio2,Juan M. Falcn-Prez2,4,5 & Isabel Guerrero1

The Hedgehog signalling pathway is crucial for development, adult stem cell maintenance, cell migration and axon guidance in a wide range of organisms. During development, the Hh morphogen directs tissue patterning according to a concentration gradient. Lipid modications on Hh are needed to achieve graded distribution, leading to debate about how Hh is transported to target cells despite being membrane-tethered. Cytonemes in the region of Hh signalling have been shown to be essential for gradient formation, but the carrier of the morphogen is yet to be dened. Here we show that Hh and its co-receptor Ihog are in exovesicles transported via cytonemes. These exovesicles present protein markers and other features of exosomes. Moreover, the cell machinery for exosome formation is necessary for normal Hh secretion and graded signalling. We propose Hh transport via exosomes along cytonemes as a signicant mechanism for the restricted distribution of a lipid-modied morphogen.

1 Centro de Biologa Molecular Severo Ochoa (CSIC-UAM), Nicols Cabrera 1, Universidad Autnoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain.

2 CIC bioGUNE, Bizkaia Technology Park, 48160 Derio, Spain. 3 University of St Andrews, Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, North Haugh, St Andrews, Scotland KY16 9ST, UK. 4 IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Spain. 5 Centro de Investigacin Biomdica en Red de Enfermedades Hepticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Bizkaia Technology Park, 48160 Derio, Spain. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.M.F.-P. (email: mailto:[email protected]

Web End [email protected] ) or to I.G. (email: mailto:[email protected]

Web End [email protected] ).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1

ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

The Hh molecule acts as a morphogen to regulate growth and cell fate specication at a distance. In different systems, Hh is secreted from a restricted group of cells

and distributed in a concentration-dependent manner according to distance from the source, resulting in differential activation of target genes1. Thus, Hh production, release, transport and reception must be kept under strict spatial and temporal control to accomplish an activity gradient. Hh gradient formation mechanisms have been studied extensively in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc comprising two cell populations with different adhesion afnities dividing the eld into a posterior(P) and an anterior (A) compartment. The P compartment cells produce Hh, which moves across the A/P compartment border, decreasing in concentration as it spreads away from the border to the A compartment (scheme in Fig.1a). Hh is post-translationally modied by the addition of cholesterol2 and palmitic acid3, which promote Hh association to lipid membranes but are essential for its restricted spreading4, raising the question of how its actual secretion and transfer are achieved. In both the wing disc and the abdominal epidermis of Drosophila, specialized lopodia called cytonemes5 are crucial for establishment of the Hh gradient6. Cytonemes are easily visualized by confocal microscope in the basal part of the wing disc epithelium by expressing the Hh co-receptor Interference hedgehog (Ihog)68, which also labels punctate structures8 with a size of 0.10.6 mm; some of them seem to exceed the cytoneme diameter, suggesting they could be extracellular vesicles (EVs)6. In the chicken limb bud, particles containing SonicHh (SHh) and CDO (vertebrate homologue of Ihog) have also been shown to travel along lopodia-like extensions within the eld of SHh signalling9. Here we characterize these structures and their association with Hh, determining the role of EVs in Hh distribution and gradient formation.

ResultsHedgehog is located in EVs that move towards recipient cells. In the wing disc, Hh punctate structures (endogenous or ectopically expressed Hh-green uorescent protein (GFP)) locate at the plasma membrane both apically and basolaterally (Fig. 1b), and in both P and A compartment cells near the A/P border1 (Fig. 1c). Importantly, these puncta can be partially labelled by extracellular ex vivo staining with anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 1b,c), indicating the presence and the extracellular localization of Hh on their surface. They are more abundant at the basolateral part of the disc epithelium (Fig. 1b,c red and yellow puncta), and distinct from cytoplasmic puncta8 (green puncta in Fig. 1c).

The co-expression of Hh-GFP and Ihog-RFP reveals puncta labelled with both markers in the A compartment, as well as puncta that just contain Hh-GFP probably due to internalization

of Hh-GFP vesicles by the receiving cells (Fig. 1d, see also Supplementary Movie 1). Live imaging of Ihog-RFP puncta in the abdomen, where Hh also acts as a morphogen10, conrms their presence both laterally as well as basolaterally, similar to Hh (Supplementary Movie 2). Dispatched (Disp)11 and Dally-like (Dlp)8, both essential for Hh release8, also co-localize with Ihog-labelled punctate structures and cytonemes (Fig. 1eg). These results indicate that Hh could indeed be transported in EVs together with other pathway components, Ihog, Disp and Dlp, all involved in Hh release. The punctate structures localize to cytonemes in the basal side of the epithelium6, and as ex vivo antibody staining marks both Disp and Hh, these proteins might all be at the surface of EVs (Supplementary Fig. 1G).

To further investigate the EV nature of the puncta, immuno-labelling for Hh in wing discs co-expressing Ihog-RFP and the mammalian EV marker CD63 tagged with GFP12 was performed, revealing a clear co-localization of the three in punctate structures (Fig. 2a). This co-localization was also conrmed by live imaging in the abdominal epidermis of pupae co-expressing CD63-GFP and Ihog-RFP (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Movie 3). Furthermore, immunoprecipitation of the GFP-tagged CD63 shows co-immunoprecipitation of Ihog-RFP and endogenous Hh in vivo (Fig. 2ce), supporting the presence of CD63 in the HhIhog complex observed by confocal imaging and strongly advocating the EV nature of the puncta (Fig. 2a,b).

Detailed observation of movies with CD63-GFP marked puncta shows their association with cytonemes in basal regions, where they move along the cytonemes which point from the P towards the A compartment (Fig. 3a,b and Supplementary Movies 4 and 5). Live imaging of cells expressing either the membrane marker CD4-Tomato or Ihog-RFP also shows punctate structures moving along cytonemes (Fig. 3c,d and Supplementary Movie 6 and 7, see also ref. 6). Interestingly, CD4-Tomato labelling occasionally shows buckling followed by a swelling structure, which might be related to direct shedding of vesicles from the cytoplasmic membrane (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Movie 6), also sporadically observed in puncta labelled with Ihog-RFP (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Movie 7).

Immuno-EM reveals Hh in MVB/EV and plasma membrane. To analyse the distribution of Hh at the ultrastructural level, immunoelectron microscopy (Immuno-EM) was performed on thawed cryosections of wing discs expressing Hh-GFP. Supplementary Fig. 1AF shows correlative light-electron microscopy of the Hh distribution on ultra-thin cryosections cut orthogonal to the ventral/dorsal axis. Immunouorescent Hh staining (Supplementary Fig. 1A) was detected along the whole apical disc lumen and at the basolateral region of the P compartment. At the EM level, apical Hh signal was found

Figure 1 | Hh and key signalling components are present in EVs and cytonemes. (a) Schematic representation of a cross-section of the wing disc showing the expression of Hh in both epithelia; disc proper (DP) and peripodial membrane. (b) Transverse section of a hh.Gal44UAS.Hh-GFPwing disc which has been ex vivo stained with anti-GFP antibody for 1 h at low temperature to avoid Hh-GFP internalization. Note the co-localizationof Hh-GFP and externalized GFP (red) mainly at the basolateral part of the disc epithelium (bottom of image). (c) Confocal sections of a similar hh.Gal44UAS.Hh-GFP wing disc ex vivo stained with anti-GFP antibody. Note that the co-localization of green and red (externalized Hh) is increased in more basolateral sections. The internalized Hh-GFP at the A compartment is in green (white arrow heads). Note also that in the most basal section

Hh puncta appear to be aligned in a beads on a string arrangement, suggesting they associate to cytonemes (see also ref. 6). (d) Ex vivo staining using an anti-GFP antibody in a UAS.Hh-GFP/UAS.Ihog-RFP; hh.Gal4/tubGal80ts wing disc after 24 h at the restrictive temperature. Note the co-localization between Hh and Ihog (arrow heads) in the A compartment and also the presence of externalized Hh at the cellular extensions marked by the Ihog protein. (e) Dlp expression in a tubGal80ts; UAS.Ihoh-YFP/hh.Gal4 wing disc for 24 h. (e) Insets in e showing the co-localization of puncta of Ihog and Dlp (arrow heads) in the A compartment. (f) Ectopic expression of UAS-Ihog-YFP and UAS-Disp using the hh.Gal4; tubGal80ts system for 24 h. (f) Insets in f show the co-localization of puncta of both proteins (arrow heads) in the A compartment. (g) Ex vivo staining using an anti-Disp antibody in a UAS-Disp/UAS-iHo-CFP; hh.Gal4/tubGal80ts wing disc after 24 h at the restrictive temperature. Note the co-localization of Disp, Dlp and Ihog in the A compartment cells (arrow heads) (insets g). Scale bars,10 mm.

2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 ARTICLE

on microvilli membranes (Supplementary Fig. 1B), whereas basolateral staining on Hh-producing cells was mainly detected within multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and lysosomes as well as on the basolateral membranes (Supplementary Fig. 1CE).

Interestingly, Hh staining was also detected on heterogeneous vesicle-like structures (size ranging from 30 to 200 nm) in basolateral extracellular spaces close to the basal lamina (Supplementary Fig. 1F,f). To further explore the extracellular

hh.Gal4 > UAS.HhGFP

HhGFP

P -GFPext

HhGFP

-GFPext

hh.Gal4 > UAS.HhGFP

Lateral

Apical Basal

c Lateral

HhGFP

-GFPext

HhGFP

-GFPext

HhGFP

-GFPext

HhGFP

-GFPext

hh.Gal4 > UAS.HhGFP; UAS.IhogRFP

Lateral Lateral Lateral Basal Basal

IhogRFP

HhGFP

-GFPext IhogRFP

HhGFP -GFPext

-GFPext

IhogRFP

hh.Gal4> UAS.IhogYFP

hh.Gal4 > UAS.DISP ; UAS.IhogYFP

e f

-Dlsp IhogYFP

-Dlp IhogYFP

-Dlsp IhogYFP

-Dlp

IhogYFP

-Disp

IhogYFP

hh.Gal4 >UAS.Disp ; UAS.IhogCFP

g g

-Dispext IhogCFP

-Dlp -Dispext IhogCFP -Dlp

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3

ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

hh.Gal4 > UAS.IhogRFP; UAS.CD63GFP

IhogRFP

CD63GFP

-Hh

20 m

10 m

Merge

CD63GFP

IhogRFP

-Hh

CD63GFP

IP: CD63-GFP + Ihog-RFP

IP control

Input

IP control

Depl.

IP Control

Input

Depl.

Input

kDa

100 70 55

kDa

100

kDa

70 55

WB: -RFP

WB: -GFP WB: -Hh

Figure 2 | Hh and Ihog can complex with the exosome marker CD63 in vivo. (a) Lateral view of a reconstructed z-stack of confocal images from a wing disc expressing the exosome marker UAS.CD63-GFP and UAS.Ihog-RFP under the control of hh.Gal4/tubG80ts after 24 h at the restrictive temperature and immuno-labelled for Hh. Note the co-localization of Ihog-RFP (red) and the endogenous Hh (grey) with the marker CD63-GFP (arrow heads). Scale bar, 20 mm. (b) Live imaging of Drosophila abdomen shows CD63-GFP labelled puncta that co-localizes with puncta also labelled by Ihog-RFP (arrow heads) and that move along the cytoneme (See also Supplementary Movie 3). Scale bar, 10 mm. (ce) Western blots showing co-immunoprecipation of CD63-GFP,

Ihog-RFP and endogenous Hh after a GFP-Trap pull down (Chromoteck) from a high-speed supernatant of homogenized larvae expressing CD63-GFP as control and larvae co-expressing CD63-GFP and Ihog-RFP as expermiental. (c) Immunoprecipitation of CD63-GFP shown for both, the IP control and the experimental IP control (arrowhead). (d) Co-immunoprecipitation of Ihog-RFP revealed by anti-RFP in the experimental IP control (arrow) and not present in the IP control. (e) Co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous Hh revealed (after membrane antibody stripping) by anti-Hh in the experimental IP control (asterisk) and not present in the IP control, probably due to an enrichment effect of the co-expression of Ihog-RFP and CD63-GFP.

distribution of Hh, wing discs expressing Hh-GFP were labelled ex vivo with an anti-GFP antibody before EM processing. As shown in Fig. 4a,b, thawed cryosections labelled with a dual uorescent and electron-dense Fab0fragment probe showed apical staining and a basolateral punctate uorescent pattern at the P compartment, fully consistent with the punctate labelling of external Hh observed at the confocal microscope (Fig. 1). In addition, at the EM level, immunogold staining detected Hh-GFP on apical microvilli membranes (arrows in Fig. 4c, d) as well as on discrete regions of basolateral membranes (arrows in Fig. 4f,j), frequently associated with cell-to-cell contacts (arrows in Fig. 4j). Importantly, signicant Hh labelling was detected on clusters of vesicle-like structures at the basolateral extracellular spaces (arrowheads in Fig. 4g,m,n,p) and some of these vesicles appear also localized in association with cell protrusions (arrowheads in insets Fig. 4g and m). Finally, immuno-EM conrmed the presence of Hh, Ihog and Disp at MVBs and exovesicles (Supplementary Fig. 1GI) in cryosections of wing discs expressing Ihog-CFP and Disp-YFP, respectively. Altogether, these

results support the notion that all these Hh signalling pathway components share the same secretion mechanism in exovesicles at basolateral spaces.

Due to the size of some of these EVs (30150 nm) and their association with MVBs, they could comprise bona de exosomes13, dened as EVs enriched in cholesterol, sphingomyelin, ceramide and components of membrane raft microdomains14. Exosomes originate from MVBs and are released to the extracellular space following fusion with the plasma membrane, containing proteins implicated in trafcking, membrane fusion and signalling15. Hh has been shown to trafc from apical to basolateral plasma membranes68 and this recycling process might actually localize Hh in MVBs. Both processes, Hh release8 and MVB formation, require Rab5, Rab4 and Rab8 function16,17.

Hh-loaded exovesicles in culture cells. Further characterization using Drosophila cultured wing disc cells, Cl8, as well as

4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 ARTICLE

hh.Gal4 >UAS.CD63-GFP

5 m

0 s 14 s 28 s

hh.Gal4 >UAS.CD63-GFP

0 s 37 s 56 s

10 m

hh.Gal4 >UAS.CD4-Tomato

00:00 min 00:41 min 06:49 min 08:33 min

5 m

00:00 min

12:28 min

06:14 min

15:35 min

07:22 min

25:47 min

hh.Gal4 > UAS.Ihog-RFP

10 m

Figure 3 | Punctate structures move along cytonemes in vivo. (a,b) CD63-GFP labels punctate structures that move along cytonemes. Cells of the P compartment are labelled with hh.Gal44UAS.CD63-GFP. (a) Individual frames taken from Supplementary Movie 4. Black arrows indicate puncta.

Fluorescence is depicted using an inverted grey lookup table (LUT). (b) Individual frames taken from Supplementary Movie 5. Arrowheads indicate puncta. Fluorescence is depicted using a grey LUT (left) and a HiLo LUT (right), which highlights the brightest pixels in red. (c) Cytonemes labelled with CD4-Tomato show buckling and swelling. These structures might be related to the shedding of vesicles, which we could observe occasionally (see d). Individual frames taken from Supplementary Movie 6. Cells of the P compartment are labelled with hh.Gal44UAS.CD4-Tomato. Fluorescence is depicted using an inverted grey lookup table. (d) Occasionally, we observe punctate structures shedding from the cytonemes. Individual frames taken from

Supplementary Movie 7. Cytonemes reaching into the A compartment are labelled with hh.Gal44UAS.Ihog-RFP and coloured with a re lookup table. Left panel: overview. Right panels: time sequence of detail indicated in the overview. Note punctate structures, which are located along the cytonemes.

One punctum (white arrows) is budding (cyan arrowheads) and nally shedding from the cytoneme (orange arrowhead).

transfected S2 cells expressing Hh-GFP also show the presence of endogenous Hh or Hh-GFP in EVs. These EVs have exosome-like features based on otation density and protein markers (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 2A,B). Characterization of the vesicular

fraction by isopynic density gradients shows co-fractioning of the Hh protein with membrane (TSG101, Rab11, Rab8 and Syntaxin), and luminal (Hsp70) exosomal-associated proteins18 (Fig. 5b) and the Hh co-receptor Ihog (Supplementary Fig. 2C).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5

ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

a c d

e f

hh.Gal4>UAS.HhGFP

h i j

l m o p

Basal Basal

Figure 4 | Ultrastructural localization of Hh in imaginal discs. Correlative light-electron microscopy of wing discs expressing Hh-GFP. Discs were labelled ex vivo with a rabbit anti-GFP antibody and then xed and processed for cryosectioning. Ultra-thin sections, cut orthogonally to the V/D axis, were incubated with a uorescent (Alexa594) 1.4-nm nanogold-conjugated anti-rabbit Fab probe. Labelled cryosections were rst imaged at the uorescence microscope (a) and then at the transmission electron microscope after silver enhancement of the nanogold signal (bp). At the light microscopylevel (a) uorescent labelling is detected at apical areas and at basolateral regions of the P compartment. At the EM level, apical immunogold labelling (c and d shows the area delimited by a red box in b) decorated microvilli membranes (arrows in d), whereas basolateral signal (fi shows EM images of the area delimited by a blue box in b, while jp shows details of a different disc) is mainly associated with discrete extents of the plasma membrane (arrows in f,i,j) that frequently coincide with cell-to-cell contacts (arrows in j). Also, immunogold labelling is detected in clusters of EV-like structures (arrowheads in g,i,k,m,n,p), some of which are associated with cell protrusions (insets in f (g) and l (m)). A and P compartments as well as apical (Ap) and basolateral (Bs) regions are indicated in a and b. To help the interpretation, apical and basolateral extracellular spaces are depicted in red (c) and blue (f,ip), respectively. a to i correspond to the same wing disc, whereas j to p correspond to a different specimen. LD, lipid droplet. Scale bars, 25 mm (a,b), 5 mm (e), 500 nm (c,h,j,l,o), 200 nm (d,f,i,k,m,n) and 100 nm (g,p).

Previously, it has been described that Hh is associated to lipoproteins (Drosophila apoliproteins; Lipophorins (Lp-I and Lp-II19) for transport12. Lp-II has also been detected in EV preparations in the presence of y extracts (source of Lps in the Drosophila cell culture medium) but Lp-II does not co-fractionate with Hh-containing exosomes (Fig. 5a,b). Moreover, Hh-loaded EVs were able to activate the Ptc::luciferase reporter (Fig. 5c,d), further showing that the Hh protein present in these EVs is functional.

Finally, interfering with proteins involved in the production/ secretion of EVs, TSG101 and Rab27 (refs 2022) in Drosophila wing disc cells (Cl8 cells) leads to a signicant reduction in the levels of Hh protein associated to EVs (Supplementary Fig. 2D). However, in our in vitro model, interference with the ESCRT-independent exosome production protein nSMase does not show a signicant decrease in the Hh levels within EVs (Supplementary Fig. 2D). Together, the results obtained from cell cultured EV analysis support the notion that at least a

6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 ARTICLE

Control Hh-GFP

SN1500

EVs

kDa

250

SN45

SN1500

EVs

SN45

1.05

1.06

1.07

1.08

1.10

1.12

1.15

1.19

1.24

1.25

Density (g ml1)

kDa

Hedgehog (Hh-GFP)

25 25

ApoLII

Syntaxin

Rab11

Hsp70

150 100

Hedgehog (Hh-GFP)

ApoLII

Ubiquitinated proteins

Hsp70

Tsg101

Rab11

Rab8

Syntaxin

Luciferase activity

(relative to mean control)

2.0

1.0

0.0

EVs L3

20 Hedgehog

4.0 n=3 n=3 n=3

EVs Shh

No additives

3.0

Figure 5 | Hedgehog protein is associated to EVs with features of exosomes. (a) A representative western blotting of supernatants (SN1500 and SN45) and EVs obtained from 5 ml of media from mock- (control) or Hh-GFP-transfected Cl8 cells. Similar volume of supernatants (1/350 of the total) and 1/5th of the EVs were applied to the gel. Antibodies against indicated proteins were used as described in Methods. Antibody against Hh showed that Hh is found in EVs, although the Hh-associated to EVs represents less than 10% of the total secreted forms (n 3). (b) EVs from Hh-GFP-transfected cells

were fractionated by continuous sucrose density gradient and equal amounts (1/5th) of the resulting fractions analysed by western blotting. Specic antibodies show the presence of Hh and protein markers of exosomes (Ubiquitinated proteins, Hsp70, TSG101 and Rab11) mapping at similar densities. ApoLII was also tested in the gradient, showing a different pattern along the gradient. (c) Western blot analysis of Hh protein in EVs obtainedfrom untransfected Cl8 cells and extract from larvae stage 3 (L3). (d) Luciferase activity in Cl8 cells transfected with ptcD136-GL3 Firey responsible reporter and incubated without (Control) or with EVs obtained from Cl8 cells. Shh recombinant protein was used as positive inducer. Means.d. of three replicates is shown. Signicance level (Students t-test) **Po0.01.

fraction of functional Hh is secreted in exosome-like vesicles in Drosophila cells.

Exovesicle formation genes are needed for Hh release in vivo. From an in vivo perspective, preliminary observations have shown a reduction of the Hh gradient when blocking EVs formation via RNA interference (RNAi) treatment6. Further, in vivo RNAi screening conrmed the previously observed role of genes involved in EV formation and release, identifying new proteins involved in the graded secretion of Hh via EVs. Five RNAi treatments show an effect on the Hh gradient by the analysis of the Ptc::GFP-Enhancer-Trap expression, a recognized reporter for both, short- and long-range Hh responses: the ESCRT complex components Vps22 (ESCRT-II component) and Vps24 (ESCRT-III component), the ESCRT-independent sorting protein SMase23, the SNARE complex component Ykt6 and the Drosophila homologous for the P4-ATPase (CG31729), TAT-5 in C. elegans shown to regulate the budding of EVs from the plasma membrane (shedding vesicles/ectosomes/ microparticles)24 (Fig. 6ad). All these proteins are involved in EV secretion pathways and Ykt6 has also been shown to be involved in the release of exosomes containing Wingless (Wg)25. In addition, to conrm the requirement of EV formation during Hh signalling, we have quantied the effect of knocking down a fraction of the genes identied over the long-range target Cubitus interruptus (Ci), and a signicant decrease in

activation was also observed (Fig 6A,eh). These experiments then endorse the necessity of the molecular machinery for EV formation and release for both short- as well as long-range Hh signalling.

To further analyse the effect of knocking down EVs production genes over Hh-loaded EVs in vivo, we ectopically expressed Hh-GFP or Ihog-RFP in producing cells, quantifying the visible punctate structures only in the A compartment (Fig. 6il and for methods Supplementary Fig. 3). We tested RNAi treatments with a clear effect in Hh signalling (Fig. 6ah and ref. 6) including the ESCRT-0 protein Hrs26, the accessory ESCRT protein ALiX26, the EV component Anx B11 (ref. 27), the endosomal sorting protein Rab11 implicated in EV targeting28 and the lipid raft component Flo2 also found in EVs29. All RNAi treatments tested result in signicantly fewer Hh-GFP puncta in the A compartment (Fig. 6ik), showing an effect on actual Hh secretion. Similar reduction effects were also observed for Ihog-RFP puncta, conrming again the role of these genes in the regulation of the Hh pathway (Fig. 6k). Moreover, interfering with EV production decreases the externalized levels of endogenous Hh (see Fig 6C,c expressed in levels of ratio change), shown by ex vivo staining after depletion only in the dorsal compartment of the disc, while the ventral part retains the wild-type conditions (Fig. 6m,n). Importantly, all RNAis used did not have a signicant apoptotic effect after treatment (Supplementary Fig. 4A). In addition, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RTPCR) experiments for four of these treatments conrmed

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7

ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

hh.Gal4 >UAS.SMase-RNAi

hh.Gal4 control hh.Gal4 control

hh.Gal4 >UAS.Vps24-RNAi

hh.Gal4 >UAS.Hrs-RNAi

hh.Gal4 >UAS.TSG101-RNAi

a b c e f g

Ptc-Trap::GFP Ptc-Trap::GFP Ptc-Trap::GFP

10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m 10 m

d h

n=12

n=12 n=12 n=12 n=14

n=14 n=14 n=12

n=8 n=8

n=8 n=7

n=9 n=10

Gradient length (m) rel. to wing pouch

0.18

0.16

0.25

0.14

0.20

* *

0.12

** **

0.10

0.15

0.08

0.06

CG31729 RNAi

SMase RNAi

Vps22

RNAi

Vps24

RNAi

Ykt6

Control RNAi

AnxB11

RNAi

SMase

RNAi

Control

Hrs

RNAi

RNAi TSG101

RNAi

Vps22

Vps24

RNAi

Vps4

RNAi

Treatment

hh.Gal4>UAS.HhGFP control

A/P

hh.Gal4>UAS.HhGFP;UAS.AnxB11-RNAi

Hhext -Ptc Hh -Ptc

-Ptc -Ptc

20 m 20 m

20 m

HhGFP

20 m

HhGFP

A/P

20 m

k l

n=12 n=12 n=12

n=13 n=9

n=7 n=7 n=5 n=11 n=10 n=8

n=8 n=10 n=10

n=9 n=10

n=8 n=8

n=10

2000

1000

HhGFP vesicle number (log scale)

IhogRFP vesicle number (log scale)

1000

500

***

200

100

*** **

** ***

***

ALiX RNAi

AnxB11 RNAi

CG31729 RNAi

Control

Flo2 RNAi

Hrs RNAi

Rab11 RNAi

TSG101 RNAi

SMase RNAi

Vps4 RNAi

Ykt6 RNAi

ALiX RNAi

AnxB11 RNAi

Control

Flo2 RNAi

Hrs RNAi

Rab11 RNAi

TSG101 RNAi

Vps4 RNAi

Treatment

ap.Gal4>UAS.GFP Control

ap.Gal4>UAS.GFP; UAS.TSG101-RNAi

m n

n=8 n=15 n=11 n=12 n=10

***

Gray ratio wild type:apterous

1.6

1.4

UAS.GFP

1.2

1.0

-Hhext

Control

Hrs RNAi

Vps22

TSG101 RNAi

Rab11 RNAi

RNAi

-Hhext

Treatment

8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 ARTICLE

process remain obscure and might also be dependent on the ESCRT complex24. In addition, studies have shown a crucial role for cholesterol-rich microdomains of the plasma membrane for shedding vesicle formation32 as well as for biogenesis of exosomes14. In our in vivo experiments, we have observed a decrease in Hh signalling by knocking down Vps22, an ESCRT-II complex component described as dispensable for vesicles derived directly from the plasma membrane33,34, but required for MVB formation35 (reviewed in ref. 36) supporting an MVB fusion origin. However, we have also observed a decrease in signalling and Hh release when interfering with P4-ATPase (CG31729), the Drosophila orthologue of TAT-5 specically involved in the formation of ectosomes in C. elegans24. Thus, as it is difcult to account for the considerable differences between the two types of vesicles, the result of knocking down Vps22 and P4-ATPase together with the EM data and the in vivo imaging indicate that Hh might be released in both ectosomes/microvesicles and exosome-like vesicles. Determining which process might be the main one regulating Hh secretion or whether both processes are linked is a future challenge.

In vitro, functional tests demonstrate that Hh-loaded exovesicles fractionate together with classical exosomal markers (Fig. 5b), and are able to activate Hh-dependent transcription in cell culture (Fig. 5d). Furthermore, interference with genes involved in the formation and release of EVs in vivo has a decreasing effect on the release of Hh to the extracellular space, altering the Hh gradient formation during signalling (Fig. 6). In our experimental model (the Drosophila wing imaginal disc), all RNAi treatments behave similarly, independent of their individual function within the EVs formation pathways. The only exceptions were given by the silencing of ESCRT-I component TSG101 and the ECRT-II component Vps22, which resulted in a signicant accumulation of total Hh in the P compartment (Supplementary Fig. 4C) but still impaired Hh secretion to the A compartment (Fig. 6io), probably due to a simultaneous impairment of the route for Hh degradation as they both play a key role in MVB formation26,35. Differential outputs after downregulation of different EVs formation genes have been reported, including an increment in EVs release (for example, ALiX RNAi)26. However, there is an increasing evidence of the heterogeneous nature of EVs in size, protein content and origin18.Depletion of a gene involved in the formation pathway might either affect EVs release in general or might alter the proportion of the different vesicles formed26. Thus, quantifying the effects over those vesicles containing Hh or Ihog might not detect potentially distinct changes in the distribution of different size vesicles or protein content.

Association of Hh to EVs, and thus membranes, supports the transport mechanism initially proposed by Greco et al.37 for the

Figure 6 | Hh signalling and release in mutant conditions for exosome production genes. (ah) Hh signalling in wing discs expressing RNAi treatments in the P compartment (bd,fh) and control (a,e), visualized in the A compartment using the Ptc-promotor-Trap::GFP reporter (ad) and immunolabelling for the long-range target Ci (eh). Detail shown at the bottom and anterior is to the left. Note in RNAi wing discs (bd,fh), gradients are shorter than in controls (a,e). (d,h) Box plot comparing gradient length expressed as a proportion of wing pouch length, between control discs and treatments for each reporter. (il) Quantication of the number of Hh-GFP (ik) or Ihog-RFP (l) released punctate structures. Reconstruction in Z (lateral view) of wing discs expressing Hh-GFP (i) or co-expressing Hh-GFP and RNAi for AnxB11 (j) under the control of hh.Gal4 and immunostained for the transcription target Ptc (red, also a marker of the A compartment cells), note punctate structures in the A compartment, decrease after RNAi treatment. (k) Boxplot comparing the number of Hh-GFP puncta released for the control (UAS.Hh-GFP) and 10 exosome-related treatments. Note the reduction in the number of puncta. (l) Boxplot comparing the number of Ihog-RFP puncta (anterior compartment) for the control (UAS.Ihog-RFP) and seven treatments related to exosome production. Note the reduction in the number of puncta. (mo) Endogenous externalized Hh levels decrease in mutant conditions for exosome production genes. Ex vivo staining for Hh in wild-type discs (m) or in wing disc expressing RNAi for TSG101 (n) driven by ap.Gal4 with a dorsal expression domain (marked by GFP), leaving the ventral domain in wild-type conditions as an internal control. Note the decrease in uorescence after treatment (m,n). (o) Boxplot showing the ratio between relative intensity of the mean grey value in the dorsal (RNAi treated) versus the ventral compartment (wild type). The ratio is close to 1 in control, while the ratio for all RNAi cases is greater than 1 due to a decrease in the levels of external Hh in treated cells. Signicance levels for pairwise tests (Tukey HSD or Wilcoxon, depending on Normality of data): ***Po0.001, **Po0.01, *Po0.05, Po0.1. Scale bars,10 mm.

the signicant reduction of targeted RNA levels induced by the RNAis expression (Supplementary Fig. 4B).

On the other hand, immunolabelling for total endogenous Hh levels of wing discs expressing the RNAi constructs only in the dorsal compartment, and compared to the wild-type ventral compartment, show no signicant change, excluding potential effects of RNAi treatments over production or degradation of intracellular Hh (Supplementary Fig. 4C). The only exceptions to the latter observation were the RNAi treatment for the ESCRT-I component TSG101 and the ESCRT-II component Vps22, which show signicant accumulation of total Hh on the P compartment (paired t-test, t 5.19, df 7, Po0.01; Supplementary

Fig. 4C,c). However, despite this accumulation, both TSG101 and Vps22 RNAi treatment still lead to a reduction in the extracellular levels of Hh (Fig. 6mo). Thus, taking into account all data from RNAi treatments, EV production is required for the normal release levels of Hh to the extracellular space in the wing disc and consequently for the normal graded signalling pattern.

DiscussionOur previous research showed a requirement for cytonemes extending from Hh producer cells towards receptor cells for Hh gradient formation, while Hh was also observed in punctate structures6. Here we characterized these puncta conrming their EV nature and role during Hh signalling. These Hh-loaded exovesicles are a heterogeneous group, differing in size and potentially in origin. In vivo imaging shows puncta moving along cytonemes, suggesting a route of Hh secretion and restricted dispersion where Hh-containing EVs are transported by cytonemes. Nevertheless, to date, we still do not know the precise mechanism used for Hh release and transport along the cytoneme. Ultrastructural analysis conrmed the presence of Hh in MVBs on the A compartment, supporting an ESCRT dependent route of exovesicle formation and release. Thus, it is possible that MVBs fuse to the plasma membrane-releasing vesicles at the same time as cytonemes are elongating. Alternatively or in addition, smaller vesicles (that may well be small MVBs) appear to be travelling within the cytoneme. However, live imaging of these structures also shows puncta shedding directly from the cytonemes, and these might correspond to membrane-derived vesicles known as shedding vesicles or ectosomes/microvesicles30.

Ectosome EVs were described as bigger than exosomes and more heterogeneous in size, ranging from 200 nm to greater than 1 mm in diameter, and are originated by shedding preceded by the budding of small cytoplasmic protrusions, which then detach by ssion of their stalk30. Although shedding vesicles/ectosomes seem to have a different origin31, the mechanisms of their sorting

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 9

ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

spread of Wg protein; Wg secreted and moved while contained in membrane fragments called argosomes. Vesicular release of SHh has also been described in the determination of leftright asymmetry in vertebrates38. Moreover, Hh has been found in exosomal structures for its apical secretion in C. elegans39. We have found a functional Hh associated to heterogeneous EVs, either originated from MVBs or/and directly shedding from the plasma membrane of cytonemes, and that are essential for Hh gradient formation.

Recent reports also show Wg and Wnt to be released in exosomes at the wing disc, in the zebrash and tissue culture cells21,22,25,40. During patterning of the zebrash neuroectoderm, Wnt8a localizes to the membrane-associated punctate structures in live tissue and these puncta are found on lopodial cellular processes40. In Drosophila, Wg has also been visualized in vivo moving along cellular extensions by Evi-exosomes18 or released as exosomes from MVBs at synaptic terminals22. The release of exosomes and further activation of the Hh pathway in an epithelium might then require a synaptic process with a potential complex association of various proteins. Thus, in vitro experiments with cultured cells might not be able to reproduce the signalling process in an epithelium, leading to the relatively low representation of Hh in exosomes and Hh-dependent transcription activation.

Overall, our results support a route for morphogen transport that involves vesicle transport and secretion along cytonemes to accomplish proper spatially restricted signalling. Still, key unanswered questions regarding the nal transfer or release of morphogens like Hh remain. Supporting a conserved mechanism in vertebrates, SHh and CDO (vertebrate homologue of Ihog) in vesicle-like structures have been observed moving along specialized lopodia in the chick limb bud9. Further elucidation of the origin, structure and function of the EVs implicated in this process as well as the mechanism of their release is likely to be essential to understand Hh cell-cell signalling. However, our results do not totally exclude a potential combinatorial effort with other secretion routes or extracellular forms of Hh, such as lipoprotein particles12,41 or Hh multimers42. Comprehending how signalling molecules like Hh are distributed will improve the knowledge of developmental processes and their role in diseases like cancer, revealing a wider set of mechanisms and genes involved in the regulation of their signalling.

Methods

Fly mutants. A description of mutations, insertions and transgenes (Supplementary Table 1) is available at Fly Base (http://flybase.org/

Web End =http://ybase.org/). Gal80ts, FLP122 (Bloomington Drosophila Stock Centre (BDSC), Indiana, USA; http://flystocks.bio.indiana.edu

Web End =http:// http://flystocks.bio.indiana.edu

Web End =ystocks.bio.indiana.edu ).

Overexpression experiments. Gal4 drivers were: hh.Gal4 (ref. 43), ap.Gal4 (ref. 44), tub.Gal4 (BDSC). The pUAS-transgenes were: UAS.Hh-GFP45, UAS.Ihog-RFP, UAS.Ihog-YFP, UAS.Ihog-CFP7,8, UAS.CD63-GFP12, UAS.CD4-tdTom46 and UAS.eGFP (BDSC).

UAS-RNAi lines targeting TSG101 (35710), ALiX (33417), Hrs (33900), Rab27 (37774), Vps 22 (38289), Vps 24 (38281), aSmase (25283) and Ykt6 (38314) were from BDSC. Flo2 (31525), AnxB11 (29693), Rab11 (108382), P4-ATPase (CG31729) (105987) and Vps4 (105977) were from the IMP Vienna Drosophila RNAi Centre (VDRC; http://stockcenter.vdrc.at

Web End =http://stockcenter.vdrc.at ). Transient expression of UAS constructs using Gal4; TubGal80ts drivers was achieved by maintaining y crosses at 18 C and inactivating Gal80ts at the restrictive temperature (29 C) for thirty hours before dissection.

Immunostaining of imaginal discs. Immunostaining was performed according to standard protocols47,48. Imaginal discs from third instar larvae were xed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/PBS for 20 min at room temperature (RT) and washed in PBT before incubating with PBT 0.2% bovine serum albumin for blocking (1 h at RT) and primary antibody incubations (overnight at 4 C). Incubation with uorescent secondary antibodies (1/200 Jackson laboratories and Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was performed for 2 h at RT for posterior washing and mounting in

media (Vectashield). Antibody dilutions were: rabbit polyclonal anti-Hh (1:800 or 1:500, raised in this work); rat monoclonal anti-Ci48 (1:20 dilution, a gift fromB. Holmgren); rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP antibody (1:500, Molecular Probes, A-6455); and rabbit polyclonal anti-Caspase 3 antibody (1:50 dilution, Asp-175 from Cell Signalling). Ex vivo labelling using anti-GFP antibody is described in ref. 45. Imaginal discs from third instar larvae were dissected on ice, transferred immediately to ice-cold M3 medium containing anti-Hh (1:30 dilution; rabbit antibody raised for this work), anti-GFP (1:50 dilution, rabbit antibody A-6455; Invitrogen) or anti-Disp8 (1:50 dilution, guinea pig antibody), or anti-Dlp (1:5 dilution; mouse antibody, Hybridome bank, Iowa) antibodies and incubated at 4 C for 30 min. The incubation with the primary antibody under these in vivo conditions, without detergents before xation rendered the antibody incapable of penetrating the cells. They were then washed in ice-cold PBS, xed in PBS 4% PFA at 4 C, washed in PBT and incubated with secondary uorescent antibody as above.

In vivo imaging of abdomen. Pupae were lmed through a window in the pupal case for analysis49. The window was made with forceps after attaching the pupa to double-sided adhesive tape. To remove the adhesive, water was used. Mounting between two spacers made of ve bands of Paralm M ensured minimal squashing. The pupa was surrounded by water, placing a coverslip over the sample and closing the open part of the chamber with voltalef oil to ensure oxygen supply. All imaged ies developed into pharate adults and many hatched. Z-stacks of around 40 mm with a step size of 2.5 or 3 mm were recorded every 150180 s using a

Leica SP8 confocal microscope at 241C.49Number (N) of recorded pupae: Supplementary Movies 2 and 7, N 8;

Supplementary Movie 3, N 3; Supplementary Movies 4 and 5, N 9;

Supplementary Movie 6, N 6.

Microscopy and image processing of imaginal discs. Laser scanning confocal microscopes (LSM510 or LSM710 Vertical; Zeiss) were used for confocal uorescence imaging of imaginal discs. ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) was used for image processing and for determining uorescence levels.

Quantication of EVs and Hh levels. Vesicle number (Fig. 6il) was quantied using ImageJ. A rectangular area of 170 75 mm was chosen and allocated in the A

compartment in the vicinity of the P compartment (Supplementary Fig. 3A,B). The edge limit of the P compartment cells was dened by creating a shaped selection after blurring of the projected image (Supplementary Fig. 3A,B); also conrmed by the immunolabelling of the A compartment Ptc expression (SupplementaryFig. 3C). Within the selection a mean lter of one pixel radius was used to smooth the image and remove noise. To remove particles that were of low uorescence intensity, the lower threshold for pixel intensities was set to 60, whereas the upper was kept at 255. Finally, the Analyse Particles tool was used to count puncta within 04.5 pixels of size (Supplementary Fig. 3A,B). Quantications were performed using individual Z slices taken every 1mm. All images were treated identically. For all RNAi treatments, a control for potential cell death due to RNAi treatment was performed by immune-staining with anti-Caspase antibody (see Supplementary Fig. 4A); no signicant increment of cell death due to treatment was detected.

Levels of externalized Hh (Fig. 6mo) and total Hh (Supplementary Fig. 4C) were quantied by determining Mean Grey Value in ImageJ. A rectangular area of approximately 14,400 pixels within the wing pouch on each side of the dorsoventral border marked by GFP expression driven by the ap.Gal4 was used.

Quantication of gradient length. Gradient lengths were determined as described in ref. 6 and expressed as a proportion of wing pouch length (Fig. 6ah).

Quantitative RT-qPCR. The RNAis ability to downregulate target genes in transgenic ies was already tested by the manufacturer (BDSC Trip toolbox stocks). Four RNAi treatments were tested (Supplementary Fig. 4B). Three independent biological replicate assays were produced for TSG101-, Flo2-, Rab11- and control EGFP-RNAi constructs, and six replicates in the case of HRS- and its control EGFP-RNAi. For RNA extraction, Drosophila third instar larvae generally expressing RNAi constructs or not were collected and kept at 80 C. Larval

tissues were homogenized in 500 ml Trizol (Invitrogen), 100 ml Chloroform (Merck). After a 15 min 15,000 g centrifugation at 4 C, the upper phase containing total RNA was collected and precipitated with 250 ml 2,3-propanol (Merck). The dry pellets were resuspended in 40 ml sterile water and stored at 80 C. For

RT-qPCR reaction, RNA concentration was measured using Nanodrop ND-1000 and RNA integrity was conrmed using the Total RNA Analysis ng sensitivity (Eukaryote) assay of the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer. cDNA was generated using Super Script III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix for qRTPCR from Invitrogen (PN 11752250), 800 ng of total RNA were used for each replicate in a nal volume of 20 ul (nal concentration of 40 ng ml 1). qPCR reactions (95 C for 10 min., 40 cycles of 95 C for 15 s and 60 C for 30 s; and 1 cycle of 95 C for 15 s, 60 C for 15 s and 95 C for 15 s) were run on the CFX 384 (Biorad) according to manufacturers instructions. Primers are displayed in Supplementary Table 2.

10 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 ARTICLE

Statistical analysis. All statistical analysis was carried out in R50. Data were tested for normality using ShapiroWilk tests (data were logged for normality where required), and for homogeneity of variance using Bartlett tests.

Models for treatment effects on gradient length. For the Ptc reporter, a KruskalWallis test of gradient length against treatments related to exovesicle production (wild type, UAS-aSmase-RNAi, UAS-Vps22-RNAi, UAS-Vps24-RNAi, UAS-Ykt6-RNAi, UAS-CG31729 (P4-ATPase)-RNAi) (n 65) showed a signicant

treatment effect (w2-test2 34.11, df 5, Po0.001). For the Ci reporter, a Kruskal

Wallis test of gradient length against treatments related to exovesicle production (wild type, UAS-Hrs-RNAi, UAS-Vps22-RNAi, UAS-Vps4-RNAi, UAS-Anxb11-RNAi, UAS-TSG101-RNAi, UAS-Vps24-RNAi, UAS-aSmase-RNAi), (n 87)

showed a signicant treatment effect (w2 36.89, df 7, Po0.001).

Pairwise Wilcoxon tests adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to test for differences between control and each treatment (Fig. 6d,h).

Models for treatment effects on number of EVs released. A KruskalWallis test of the number of Hh-GFP puncta released for control (UAS-Hh-GFP) and10 EV-related treatments (UAS-ALIX-RNAi, UAS-AnxB11-RNAi, UAS-CG31729 (P4-ATPase)-RNAi, UAS-Rab11-RNAi, UAS-Hrs-RNAi, UAS-Vps4-RNAi, UAS-Flo2-RNAi, UAS-TSG10-RNAi, UAS-YKT6-RNAi and UAS-aSmase-RNAi) (n 103) showed a signicant treatment effect (w2 54.67, df 10, Po0.001).

A KruskalWallis test carried out for the number of Ihog-RFP puncta released for control (UAS-Ihog-RFP) and seven treatments related to exosome production (UAS-Alix-RNAi, UAS-TSG101-RNAi, UAS-AnxB11-RNAi, UAS-Rab11-RNAi, UAS-Hrs-RNAi, UAS-Vps4-RNAi, UAS-Flo2-RNAi) (n 76) showed a signicant

treatment effect (w2 31.18, df 7, Po0.001).

Pairwise Wilcoxon tests adjusted for multiple comparisons were used to test for signicant differences between control and each treatment (Fig. 6k,l).

Models for treatment effect on endogenous levels of external Hh. A paired t-test comparing relative uorescence (mean grey values) for wild-type tissue and RNAi-treated tissue (UAS-TSG101-RNAi, UAS-Rab11-RNAi, UAS-Hrs-RNAi, UAS-Vps22-RNAi) (n 56) showed a signicant difference (t 13.18, df 55,

Po0.001). The Ratio WT:ap was tested for difference between RNAi expressing wing discs (ap) and discs without RNAi treatment or Control (WT), using Anova (F4,51 7.79, Po0.001). Tukeys Honest signicant difference tests were used to

test for differences between control and each treatment (Fig 6c,e).

Models for treatment effect on endogenous levels of total Hh. Paired t-tests comparing the relative uorescence (mean grey values) for wild-type tissue and RNAi-treated tissue (UAS-TSG101-RNAi, UAS-Hrs-RNAi, UAS-AnxB11-RNAi, UAS-Flo2-RNAi, UAS-Vps22-RNAi and UAS-CG31729-RNAi (P4-ATPase) (n 49)

showed non-signicant differences, except for TSG101 (t 5.19, df 7,

Po0.01) and Vps22 (t 5.50, df 7, Po0.001) treatments. The Ratio WT:ap

was tested for difference between RNAi expressing wing discs (ap) and discs without RNAi treatment or control (WT), using analysis of variance (F6,42 11.7,

Po0.001). Tukeys Honest signicant difference tests showed that the only signicant differences with control were for TSG101 (Po0.05) and Vps22 (Po0.001;

Supplementary Fig. 4C,c).

Models for treatment effects on target RNA levels. Welch two sample t-tests comparing the normalized values for RNA expression for wild-type tissue and each RNAi-treated tissue (UAS-TSG101-RNAi, UAS-Flo2-RNAi, UAS-Rab11-RNAi, UAS-Hrs-RNAi) showed signicant differences between RNAi expressing larvae and larvae without RNAi treatment or Control (Supplementary Fig. 4B). Values for each treatment are: TSG101 RNAi against Control (n 6; t 3.63, df 3.6,

Po0.05), Flo2 RNAi against Control (n 6; t 9.19, df 2.5, Po0.005), Rab11

RNAi against Control (n 6; t 18.2, df 2, Po0.005), HRS RNAi against

Control (n 12; t 4.08, df 8.3, Po0.005).

Immunoelectron microscopy. Larvae were inverted in PBS and xed in 2% (w/v) PFA and 0.2% (w/v) glutaraldehyde or 4% PFA and 0.05% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) for 2 h at room temperature and kept in 1% (w/v) PFA in PB at 4 C. Subsequently, wing discs were dissected, embedded in 10% (w/v) gelatine and processed for cryosectioning. Discs were cut orthogonal to the ventral/dorsal axis on an EM FCS cryo-ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems) at

120 C. For immunogold labelling, thawed 90-nm thick cryosections were incubated with rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, A-6455; Invitrogen, rabbit anti-Hh (1:150)(6), guinea pig anti-Disp (1:100) antibodies followed by protein A conjugated to 15-nm gold particles (EM Laboratory, Utrecht University, The Netherlands). Sections were stained with a mix of 1.8% methylcellulose and 0.4% uranyl acetate. For double labelling, anti-Disp8 and anti-Hh48 antibodies were detected with goat anti-guinea pig IgG conjugated to 10-nm gold particles and goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to 15-nm gold particles (British Biocell), respectively.

For ex vivo anti-GFP labelling experiments, discs expressing Hh-GFP were labelled with 1:30 dilution anti-rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Life

technologies (Molecular Probes)) as above and reported in ref. 45 and xed with 4% PFA and 0.05% GL in 0.1 M PB (pH 7.4) for 2 h at RT. The discs were processed for cryosectioning as described. Ultra-thin (100 nm) thawed cryosections were incubated with an anti-rabbit Fab0 fragment conjugated to Alexa594 and1.4-nm nanogold (Fluoronanogold, Nanoprobes, New York, USA), mounted with 50% glycerol and visualized with an inverted uorescence microscope (DMI6000, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For EM visualization, nanogold labelling was amplied by silver enhancement according to manufacturers instructions (Nanoprobes). Sections were stained with a mixture of methylcellulose and uranyl acetate and visualized with a JEOL JEM 1010 (Tokyo, Japan) electron microscope at 80 kV. Images were recorded with a 4 4 k CMOS F416 camera from TVIPS

(Gauting, Germany).

Immunoprecipitation. We modied a standard protocol for immunoprecipitation using Drosophila embryos51. Larvae expressing CD63-GFP, Ihog-RFP or co-expressing both under tub.Gal4 were collected and dry frozen in liquid Nitrogen. Fifty frozen larvae for each genotype were homogenized in 1 ml each of C Buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1% Triton, Protease inhibitors cocktail (Roche) and 1 mM PMSF). Extracts were initially claried by centrifugation at 35,000 g for 10 min, followed by two high-speed centrifugations at 35,000 r.p.m. for 10 and 30 min. The supernatant was incubated with GFP-Trap coupled to agarose beads (Chromoteck) for 1 h at 4 C, then washed (5 ) with C Buffer. Immunoprecipitated samples were resuspended in

sample buffer with DTT and subjected to 1 D SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting. Blotted membranes were probed with appropriate antibodies, either to RFP (1:5,000, Abcam) or GFP (1:1,000, Sigma). After antibody stripping (TrisHCL 0.5 M, pH 6.8, 2% SDS and b-mercaptoethanol0.1 M, for 30 min at 60 C) membranes were probed with anti-Hh (rabbit antibody raised for this work 1:5,000). Uncropped western blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5AC.

Cell culture. Drosophila S2 cells stably-expressing full-length Hh fused to GFP (S2::Hh-GFP) were generated using multicistronic vector pAc5-STABLE2-Neo52, and cultured in Schneiders medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 25 C. Cl8 cells were cultured in M3 medium containing 2.5% of FBS, 2.5% y extract, 10 mg ml 1 of insulin and1% penicillin/streptomycin. Transient transfections of Cl8 cells were performed using X-tremeGENE transfection reagent (Roche Applied Science) following manufacturers instructions on 25 million (5 million ml 1) cells and 6 mg of DNA per transfection experiment.

Production and isolation of EVs. Crude preparation of EVs from Hh-GFP transiently transfected Cl8 cells was obtained by collecting 5 ml of EV-depleted media and performing differential centrifugation at 2,000 g and 100,000 g of supernatants after 48 h transfection. Pellets containing crude EVs were resus-pended. For EV production of S2::Hh-GFP and Cl8 cells, 400 million cells were cultured for 48 and 96 h, respectively, in EV-depleted media (2.5 millions ml 1)

and exosomes-enriched EVs secreted into the medium were puried as previously described53; briey, culture supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 2,000 g, 4 C, for 10 min to remove cells. The resultant supernatant was subjected to ltration through 0.22-mm pore lters, followed by ultracentrifugation at 10,000 and 100,000 g for 30 and 60 min, 4 C, respectively. Resulting pellets were washed with PBS and again ultracentrifuged at 100,000 g, 4 C, for 60 min. Final pellets were suspended in PBS and stored at 80 C.

Western blot analysis. A small portion (1/350th) of supernatants obtained after 2,000 and 100,000 g, and 1/5th of the crude EVs preparations or the fractions from the sucrose gradient were analysed by western blotting. Extracts from larvae stage 3 (L3) were prepared as described7. SDS sample buffer was added to samples and incubated for 5 min at 37, 65 and 95 C and separated on 412% pre-casted acrylamide gels (Invitrogen) under non-reducing conditions. Gels were transferred to polyvinylidene diuoride membranes and blocked (5% milk and 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS) for antibody incubation. Chemoluminescent detection of proteins was performed using ECL Prime (Amersham) or Clarity Western ECL substrate (Biorad). Monoclonal antibodies were purchased from vendors indicated: anti-GFP (clones 7.1 and 13.1) from Roche, anti-GFP (clone GFP-20) for co-immunoprecipitation experiments from Sigma, anti-RFP (ab62341) from Abcam, anti-Hsp70 (BRM-22) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (Santa Cruz, CA), anti-TSG101 (4A10) from Abcam, anti-Rab11 (clone 47) and anti-ubiquitin (clone 6C1.17) from BD Biosciences (Mountain View, CA), anti-ApoLII (ref. 54) and anti-Syntaxin (8C3) from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Iowa City, IA). Rabbit polyclonal anti-Hh and anti-Ihog were obtained using the Polyclonal Genomic Antibody TechnologyTM (sdix)55. For anti-Hh production, the immunogen region used comprised the DmHh amino-acids region 80256;as for the anti-Ihog the DmIhog amino-acid region 248488 was used. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody was from GE-Healthcare (Buckinghamshire, UK). Uncropped Western blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 5.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 11

ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649

Fractionation of EVs on continuous sucrose gradient. A continuous 0.252 M sucrose gradient in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) was performed as described in ref. 56. Briey, EVs were placed on the continuous sucrose gradient and submitted to ultracentrifugation for 16 h at 210,000 g, 4 C, in a SW40Ti swinging-bucket rotor. By using an auto densi-ow density gradient fractionator (Labconco, Kansas City, MO, USA), 1 ml fractions were collected from top to bottom and 20 ml of each fraction were reserved for measurement of the refractive index to density determination. Each fraction was diluted with 2 ml of 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) and ultracentrifuged for 1 h at 100,000 g, 4 C, in a TLA-110 rotor. Supernatants were aspirated and pellets were suspended in 25 ml PBS and stored at 80 C.

Gene silencing in Drosophila cultured Cl8 cells. nSMase, TSG101 and Rab27 dsRNAs were synthesized following the protocol used at the Drosophila RNAi Screening Centre (DRSC) in Boston. Briey, DNA templates containing T7 promoters sequence on both ends were obtained from DRSC and were amplied by PCR. These PCR products were used for in vitro transcription reaction, which was carried out for 16 h at 37 C using the T7 Megascript kit from Ambion. After DNaseI (Ambion) digestion to remove the template DNA, dsRNAs were puried using RNAeasy columns (Qiagen). Both PCR-amplied DNA and puried dsRNA products were assessed by gel electrophoreses and absorbance measurements of yield. Cl8 cells were seeded in six-well plates at 2 106 per well in 0.5 ml of FBS-

free medium and 7.5 mg of dsRNA were added and incubated for 1 h, adding 1.5 ml of EV-depleted medium. After 48 h of incubation, a new dose of dsRNA was added and after another 48 h of incubation supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 min to remove cells, then centrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 h, 4 C, in a TLA-110 rotor. The resulting pellets were suspended in 25 ml of PBS and stored at

80 C for subsequent analysis by western blotting.

Luciferase activity assay of Hh EVs on cultured Drosophila cells. Cl8 cells were transfected with ptcD136-GL3 Firey responsible reporter57. After 24 h, cells were lifted and seeded into 96-wells plate, and 8-hours later incubated with 0.2 ng ml 1 of Shh recombinant protein (Sigma) or 1/4th of the crude EVs. After 24 h of treatment, Firey luciferase levels were measured using Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay System (Promega) and the ratio to the control (no EVs added) was calculated to give Hh signalling activity. This was tested in triplicate and signicant differences were tested by a t-student test.

References

1. Briscoe, J. & Therond, P. P. The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 416429 (2013).

2. Porter, J. A., Young, K. E. & Beachy, P. A. Cholesterol modication of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science 274, 255259 (1996).

3. Pepinsky, R. B. et al. Identication of a palmitic acid-modied form of human Sonic hedgehog. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1403714045 (1998).

4. Callejo, A., Torroja, C., Quijada, L. & Guerrero, I. Hedgehog lipid modications are required for Hedgehog stabilization in the extracellular matrix. Development 133, 471483 (2006).

5. Ramirez-Weber, F. A. & Kornberg, T. B. Cytonemes: cellular processes that project to the principal signaling center in Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 97, 599607 (1999).

6. Bischoff, M. et al. Cytonemes are required for the establishment of a normal Hedgehog morphogen gradient in Drosophila epithelia. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 12691281 (2013).

7. Bilioni, A. et al. Balancing Hedgehog, a retention and release equilibrium given by Dally, Ihog, Boi and shifted/DmWif. Dev. Biol. 376, 198212 (2013).

8. Callejo, A. et al. Dispatched mediates Hedgehog basolateral release to form the long-range morphogenetic gradient in the Drosophila wing disk epithelium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1259112598 (2011).

9. Sanders, T. A., Llagostera, E. & Barna, M. Specialized lopodia direct long-range transport of SHH during vertebrate tissue patterning. Nature 497, 628632 (2013).

10. Struhl, G., Barbash, D. A. & Lawrence, P. A. Hedgehog organises the pattern and polarity of epidermal cells in the Drosophila abdomen. Development 124, 21432154 (1997).

11. Burke, R. et al. Dispatched, a novel sterol-sensing domain protein dedicated to the release of cholesterol-modied hedgehog from signaling cells. Cell 99, 803815 (1999).

12. Panakova, D., Sprong, H., Marois, E., Thiele, C. & Eaton, S. Lipoprotein particles are required for Hedgehog and Wingless signalling. Nature 435, 5865 (2005).

13. Simons, M. & Raposo, G. Exosomesvesicular carriers for intercellular communication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 575581 (2009).

14. Subra, C., Laulagnier, K., Perret, B. & Record, M. Exosome lipidomics unravels lipid sorting at the level of multivesicular bodies. Biochimie 89, 205212 (2007).

15. Simpson, R. J., Jensen, S. S. & Lim, J. W. Proteomic proling of exosomes: current perspectives. Proteomics 8, 40834099 (2008).

16. Savina, A., Vidal, M. & Colombo, M. I. The exosome pathway in K562 cells is regulated by Rab11. J. Cell. Sci. 115, 25052515 (2002).

17. Vidal, M. J. & Stahl, P. D. The small GTP-binding proteins Rab4 and ARF are associated with released exosomes during reticulocyte maturation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 60, 261267 (1993).

18. Kalra, H. et al. Vesiclepedia: a compendium for extracellular vesicles with continuous community annotation. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001450 (2012).

19. Palm, W. et al. Secretion and signaling activities of lipoprotein-associated hedgehog and non-sterol-modied hedgehog in ies and mammals. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001505 (2013).

20. van Niel, G. et al. The tetraspanin CD63 regulates ESCRT-independent and -dependent endosomal sorting during melanogenesis. Dev. Cell 21, 708721 (2011).

21. Beckett, K. et al. Drosophila S2 cells secrete wingless on exosome-like vesicles but the wingless gradient forms independently of exosomes. Trafc 14, 8296 (2013).

22. Koles, K. et al. Mechanism of evenness interrupted (Evi)-exosome release at synaptic boutons. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 1682016834 (2012).

23. Trajkovic, K. et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science 319, 12441247 (2008).

24. Wehman, A. M., Poggioli, C., Schweinsberg, P., Grant, B. D. & Nance, J. The P4-ATPase TAT-5 inhibits the budding of extracellular vesicles in C. elegans embryos. Curr. Biol. 21, 19511959 (2011).

25. Gross, J. C., Chaudhary, V., Bartscherer, K. & Boutros, M. Active Wnt proteins are secreted on exosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 10361045 (2012).

26. Colombo, M. et al. Analysis of ESCRT functions in exosome biogenesis, composition and secretion highlights the heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles.J. Cell. Sci. 126, 55535565 (2013).27. Koppen, T. et al. Proteomics analyses of microvesicles released by Drosophila Kc167 and S2 cells. Proteomics 11, 43974410 (2011).

28. Thery, C. et al. Proteomic analysis of dendritic cell-derived exosomes: a secreted subcellular compartment distinct from apoptotic vesicles. J. Immunol. 166, 73097318 (2001).

29. de Gassart, A., Geminard, C., Fevrier, B., Raposo, G. & Vidal, M. Lipid raft-associated protein sorting in exosomes. Blood 102, 43364344 (2003).

30. Muralidharan-Chari, V. et al. ARF6-regulated shedding of tumor cell-derived plasma membrane microvesicles. Curr. Biol. 19, 18751885 (2009).

31. Cocucci, E., Racchetti, G., Podini, P. & Meldolesi, J. Enlargeosome trafc: exocytosis triggered by various signals is followed by endocytosis, membrane shedding or both. Trafc 8, 742757 (2007).

32. Del Conde, I., Shrimpton, C. N., Thiagarajan, P. & Lopez, J. A. Tissue-factor-bearing microvesicles arise from lipid rafts and fuse with activated platelets to initiate coagulation. Blood 106, 16041611 (2005).

33. Jimenez, A. J. et al. ESCRT machinery is required for plasma membrane repair. Science 343, 1247136 (2014).

34. Langelier, C. et al. Human ESCRT-II complex and its role in human immunodeciency virus type 1 release. J. Virol. 80, 94659480 (2006).

35. Teis, D., Saksena, S., Judson, B. L. & Emr, S. D. ESCRT-II coordinates the assembly of ESCRT-III laments for cargo sorting and multivesicular body vesicle formation. EMBO J. 29, 871883 (2010).

36. Henne, W. M., Stenmark, H. & Emr, S. D. Molecular mechanisms of the membrane sculpting ESCRT pathway. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a016766 (2013).

37. Greco, V., Hannus, M. & Eaton, S. Argosomes: a potential vehicle for the spread of morphogens through epithelia. Cell 106, 633645 (2001).

38. Tanaka, Y., Okada, Y. & Hirokawa, N. FGF-induced vesicular release of Sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid in leftward nodal ow is critical for left-right determination. Nature 435, 172177 (2005).

39. Liegeois, S., Benedetto, A., Garnier, J. M., Schwab, Y. & Labouesse, M.

The V0-ATPase mediates apical secretion of exosomes containing Hedgehog-related proteins in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol. 173, 949961 (2006).

40. Luz, M. et al. Dynamic association with donor cell lopodia and lipidmodication are essential features of Wnt8a during patterning of the zebrash neuroectoderm. PLoS ONE 9, e84922 (2014).

41. Eugster, C., Panakova, D., Mahmoud, A. & Eaton, S. Lipoprotein-heparan sulfate interactions in the Hh pathway. Dev. Cell 13, 5771 (2007).

42. Zeng, X. et al. A freely diffusible form of Sonic hedgehog mediates long-range signalling. Nature 411, 716720 (2001).

43. Tanimoto, H., Itoh, S., ten Dijke, P. & Tabata, T. Hedgehog creates a gradient of DPP activity in Drosophila wing imaginal discs. Mol. Cell 5, 5971 (2000).

44. Calleja, M., Moreno, E., Pelaz, S. & Morata, G. Visualization of gene expression in living adult Drosophila. Science 274, 252255 (1996).

45. Torroja, C., Gornkiel, N. & Guerrero, I. Patched controls the Hedgehog gradient by endocytosis in a dynamin-dependent manner, but this internalization does not play a major role in signal transduction. Development 131, 23952408 (2004).

12 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 ARTICLE

46. Han, C., Jan, L. Y. & Jan, Y. N. Enhancer-driven membrane markers for analysis of nonautonomous mechanisms reveal neuron-glia interactions in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 96739678 (2011).

47. Capdevila, J. & Guerrero, I. Targeted expression of the signaling molecule decapentaplegic induces pattern duplications and growth alterations in Drosophila wings. EMBO J. 13, 44594468 (1994).

48. Motzny, C. K. & Holmgren, R. The Drosophila cubitus interruptus protein and its role in the wingless and hedgehog signal transduction pathways. Mech. Dev. 52, 137150 (1995).

49. Bischoff, M. & Cseresnyes, Z. Cell rearrangements, cell divisions and cell death in a migrating epithelial sheet in the abdomen of Drosophila. Dev. 136, 24032411 (2009).

50. R Development Core Team. R A language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011).

51. Hughes, J. R. et al. A microtubule interactome: complexes with roles in cell cycle and mitosis. PLoS Biol. 6, e98 (2008).

52. Gonzalez, M. et al. Generation of stable Drosophila cell lines using multicistronic vectors. Sci. Rep. 1, 75 (2011).

53. Conde-Vancells, J. et al. Characterization and comprehensive proteome proling of exosomes secreted by hepatocytes. J. Proteome Res. 7, 51575166 (2008).

54. Kutty, R. K. et al. Molecular characterization and developmental expression of a retinoid- and fatty acid-binding glycoprotein from Drosophila. A putative lipophorin. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2064120649 (1996).

55. Chambers, R. S. & Johnston, S. A. High-level generation of polyclonal antibodies by genetic immunization. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 10881092 (2003).

56. Thery, C., Amigorena, S., Raposo, G. & Clayton, A. Isolation and characterization of exosomes from cell culture supernatants and biological uids. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 3, Unit 3 22 (2006).

57. Nybakken, K., Vokes, S. A., Lin, T. Y., McMahon, A. P. & Perrimon, N. A genome-wide RNA interference screen in Drosophila melanogaster cells for new components of the Hh signaling pathway. Nat. Genet. 37, 13231332 (2005).

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to M.C. Rodrguez-Navas for technical assistance, to T. Tabata for the a-Hh antibody for Immune-EM studies, B. Holmgren for the a-Ci, S. Eaton for the

UAS-CD63-GFP y line, N. Perrimon for the ptcD136-GL3 Firey responsible reporter and R. Wilson who assisted with statistical analysis and the BDSC and VDRC for stocks.

We also thank the Genomic and the Confocal microscopy facilities of the Centro de Biologa Molecular Severo Ochoa, for skilful technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Consolidation Program (CSD2007-008-25120) to R.B. andI.G., by grants BFU2011-25987 to I.G., BFU2011-25986 to R.B. and AGL2013-48998-C2-2-R to G.A. from the Spanish MICINN, by Marie Curie FP7 (ITN 238186) and by an institutional grant to the CBMSO from the Fundacin Areces to I.G. and by the Departments of Education and Industry of the Basque Government (PI2009-16 and PI2012/42), and the Bizkaia County to R.B. A.-C.G. and J.R.O.-F. were nancially supported by a Marie Curie ITN FP7 contracts, I.S. was nancially supported by a FPI fellowship of the Spanish MICINN, A.C. by fellowships awarded by the JAE-CSIC program (2008-2011), G.A. by a senior researcher AMAROUTO program of the Comunidad Autnoma de Madrid.

Author contributions

A.-C.G. performed Drosophila silencing experiments, the IP assays, imaging and statistical analysis and wrote the manuscript. E.G., L.G.-M., V.S., J.D.S., M.G. and R.B. performed in vitro tissue culture experiments. I.S. performed silencing experiments, immunostaining and confocal images of Drosophila imaginal discs, as well as quantitative RTPCR experiments. A.C., L.G.-M. and C.I. performed immunostaining and confocal images of the Drosophila imaginal discs. G.A. designed and analyzed and M.G. performed the EM experiments. M.B. performed the in vivo movies to visualise exosomes in the Drosophila adult abdomen, created Fig. 3 and commented on the manuscript. J.R.O.-F. collaborated in obtaining and characterized the anti-Hh and anti-Ihog polyclonal antibodies. J.M.F.-P. designed the in vitro tissue culture experiments. I.G. designed and analysed the Drosophila experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =naturecommunications

Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.

Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/

Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/

Web End =reprintsandpermissions/

How to cite this article: Gradilla, A.-C. et al. Exosomes as Hedgehog carriers in cytoneme-mediated transport and secretion. Nat. Commun. 5:5649doi: 10.1038/ncomms6649 (2014).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:5649 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6649 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications

Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 13

Word count: 10860

Show less

Abstract

Translate

The Hedgehog signalling pathway is crucial for development, adult stem cell maintenance, cell migration and axon guidance in a wide range of organisms. During development, the Hh morphogen directs tissue patterning according to a concentration gradient. Lipid modifications on Hh are needed to achieve graded distribution, leading to debate about how Hh is transported to target cells despite being membrane-tethered. Cytonemes in the region of Hh signalling have been shown to be essential for gradient formation, but the carrier of the morphogen is yet to be defined. Here we show that Hh and its co-receptor Ihog are in exovesicles transported via cytonemes. These exovesicles present protein markers and other features of exosomes. Moreover, the cell machinery for exosome formation is necessary for normal Hh secretion and graded signalling. We propose Hh transport via exosomes along cytonemes as a significant mechanism for the restricted distribution of a lipid-modified morphogen.

Details

Title

Exosomes as Hedgehog carriers in cytoneme-mediated transport and secretion

Author

Gradilla, Ana-citlali; González, Esperanza; Seijo, Irene; Andrés, German; Bischoff, Marcus; González-mendez, Laura; Sánchez, Vanessa; Callejo, Ainhoa; Ibáñez, Carmen; Guerra, Milagros; Ortigão-farias, João Ramalho; Sutherland, James D; González, Monika; Barrio, Rosa; Falcón-pérez, Juan M; Guerrero, Isabel

Pages

5649

Publication year

2014

Publication date

Dec 2014

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

e-ISSN

20411723

Source type

Scholarly Journal

Language of publication

English

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6649

ProQuest document ID

1629928991

Exosomes as Hedgehog carriers in cytoneme-mediated transport and secretion

Jump to:

Full text

Abstract

Details

Suggested sources