Results in treatment of distal femur fractures using polyaxial locking plate

Abstract

Indications and techniques of locked plate fixation for the treatment of challenging fractures continue to evolve. As design variant of classic locked plates, the polyaxial locked plate has the ability to alter the screw angle and thereby, enhance fracture fixation. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results in 89 patients with 90 fractures of the distal femur treated, between June 2006 and November 2011, with such a polyaxial locked plating system (Polyax(TM) Locked Plating System, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA). Seventy-seven fractures formed the report of this study. These cases were followed up until complete fracture healing or for a mean time of 77 weeks. At the time of last follow-up, 58 of 77 fractures (75.3 %) progressed to union without complication and radiographic healing occurred at a mean time of 16.3 weeks. Complications occurred in ten fractures that did not affect the healing and in nine fractures that showed delayed or non-union. The mean American Knee Society Score at the time of final follow-up was 83 for the Knee Score and 71.1 for the Functional Score. In conclusion, there is a high union rate for complex distal femoral fractures associated with a good clinical outcome in this series.

Strat Traum Limb Recon (2014) 9:1318 DOI 10.1007/s11751-013-0182-7

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Results in treatment of distal femur fractures using polyaxial locking plate

R. Pascarella C. Bettuzzi G. Bosco

D. Leonetti S. Dess P. Forte L. Amendola

Received: 11 July 2012 / Accepted: 10 December 2013 / Published online: 21 December 2013 The Author(s) 2013. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Abstract Indications and techniques of locked plate xation for the treatment of challenging fractures continue to evolve. As design variant of classic locked plates, the polyaxial locked plate has the ability to alter the screw angle and thereby, enhance fracture xation. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results in 89 patients with 90 fractures of the distal femur treated, between June 2006 and November 2011, with such a polyaxial locked plating system (PolyaxTM Locked Plating System, DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA). Seventy-seven fractures formed the report of this study. These cases were followed up until complete fracture healing or for a mean time of 77 weeks. At the time of last follow-up, 58 of 77 fractures (75.3 %) progressed to union without complication and radiographic healing occurred at a mean time of 16.3 weeks. Complications occurred in ten fractures that did not affect the healing and in nine fractures that showed delayed or non-union. The mean American Knee Society Score at the time of nal follow-up was 83 for the Knee Score and 71.1 for the Functional Score. In conclusion, there is a high union rate for complex distal femoral fractures associated with a good clinical outcome in this series.

Keywords Distal femur Fracture xation Polyaxial

locked plate Clinical outcome Radiographic outcome

Introduction

Angle-stable locked plates have been used successfully for distal femoral fractures where the new design imparts a higher

degree of stability and provides better protection against primary and secondary losses of reduction [19]. First-generation locked plates had xed-angle threaded holes allowing a stable periarticular xation but with all holes in the plate holding the screws at the same angle. This xed angle was disadvantageous for some types of fracture of the distal femur, e.g. in screw placement around prostheses in peri-prosthetic fractures [1013].

To minimise these problems, different polyaxial locking plates have been introduced, extending the concept of polyaxial screws of spinal xation systems [14]. These plates allow many options in screw angulation enhancing the possibility of fracture xation. This versatility allows for a stable osteosynthesis of highly comminuted or osteoporotic fractures. Several technologies exist to obtain variable axis locking such as self-locking bushings or screws with two components where a cap locks the screw in a chosen direction.

An important issue is the reliability of the polyaxial plate in biomechanical performance. Recent studies [15] reveal no signicant difference when compared with traditional plates with no failures in the interface between screw and plate when different polyaxial plates were analysed. There are a few reports [12] of clinical experience with polyaxial implants, and early observation conrms good performance and complication rates similar to rst-generation xed-angle plates.

The aim of this study was to assess the results of a series of distal femur fractures treated at our institution with the PolyaxTM Locked Plating System.

Materials and methods

Between June 2006 and November 2011, 89 patients with a total of 90 fractures of the distal femur were included in

R. Pascarella C. Bettuzzi G. Bosco D. Leonetti S. Dess

P. Forte L. Amendola (&)

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italye-mail: [email protected]

123

14 Strat Traum Limb Recon (2014) 9:1318

this observational study and treated with open reduction and internal xation with the PolyaxTM Locked Plating System (DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA). All clinical and radiological data were recorded from the beginning of the study period in a specically built database. All patients gave their informed consent for surgery, and the study was authorised by the local ethical committee. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki as revised in 2000.

The group included 35 male and 54 female patients. The mean age at the time of the fracture was 62 years (range 1696). Anteroposterior and lateral view radiographs of the knee were obtained to establish the fracture pattern, classication and pre-operative planning. The distal femoral fractures were classied according to the AO system: there were ve type 32A1, one type 32A3, four type 32B1, two type 32C1, two type 32C3, ten type 33A1, eight type 33A2, twelve type 33A3, one type 33B1, three type 33B2, one type 33B3, four type 33C1, twenty-eight type 33C2 and nine 33C3.

Twenty-six (29.2 %) were polytrauma patients (ISS [ 17). Periprosthetic femur fractures occurred in 13 cases (9 hips and 4 knees), and four patients presented with a fracture after intramedullary nailing of the proximal femur. There were 67 closed (74.4 %) and 23 open fractures (25.5 %): nine type 1, eight type 2 and six type 3 according to Gustilo and Anderson classication [16]. Open fractures were treated with intravenous antibiotics, tetanus prophylaxis, emergency debridement and external xation or plating according to Gustilo soft-tissue injury type within 68 h.

The timing of denitive surgery depended on the soft-tissue conditions. Eighteen patients with severe soft-tissue swelling and skin blistering were treated with temporary short-term external xation and then underwent delayed open reduction and internal xation. This staged procedure was performed in four cases of closed fractures for multiply injured patients and in 14 cases of open fractures (two type 1, six type 2, six type 3 according to Gustilo and Anderson classication) [16]. The mean time of delay for open reduction and xation was 21 days (range 745 days).

The surgical procedure was performed by the same team of experienced surgeons. In 19 cases with bone loss, a synthetic (4 cases) or homograft (15 cases) was used. An allograft cortical strut was used in 11 fractures in order to improve stability on the medial side of the metaphyseal bone loss.

Routine post-operative radiographs were performed and analysed. Malalignment was dened as the presence of more than ve degrees of angulation in any plane.

All patients had physical (compression stockings, calf or foot pumps) and pharmacologic prophylaxis for prevention

of venous thromboembolism. Post-operative rehabilitation consisted of isometric quadriceps strengthening, continuous passive motion of the knee and ambulation with crutches and no weight bearing for 810 weeks. Then, gradual weight bearing was allowed when there was evidence of progressing union on X-rays.

All patients were routinely followed in the outpatient clinic; radiological and clinical examinations (1, 2, 3, 6 months after surgery and then yearly) were conducted and the following noted: time to union, loss of reduction, hardware failure (loosening or breakage) and local or systemic complications.

Union was dened as bridging of three of the four cortices and disappearance of the fracture line on the plain radiographs for a patient who was able to bear full weight [17]. There are several published denitions of non-union, but none is universally accepted. According to Rodriguez-Merchan [18], we dene non-union as a fracture that did not heal within 8 months and required second surgery. To assess loss of reduction and hardware failure, the radio-graphs at the latest follow-up were compared with the rst post-operative ones. Patients were assessed using the Knee Society clinical rating system subdivided into a Knee Score (AKSS) based on three main clinical parameters (pain, joint stability and range of movement) and a Functional Scores (AKFS) based on the patients perception of general knee function in specic activities (walking ability and ascending/descending stairs) [19]. This dual rating system eliminates the problem of declining Knee Scores associated with increasing age or other medical conditions. A score between 85 and 100 points is considered excellent; 7084, good; 6069, fair; and \60, poor.

Results

Six patients were lost to follow-up prior to fracture union (four of them were foreigners who returned to their countries), four elderly patients (age [85 years) died for other medical problems before fracture union and three poly-trauma patients died within 1 month after surgery from multi-organ failure. Therefore, 76 patients (with 77 fractures) were included in this report. They were followed up until complete fracture healing and for a minimum of 24 weeks (range 24230) with mean follow-up of 77 weeks. At the time of last follow-up, 58 of 77 fractures(75.3 %) united without complication (Table 1, group a): radiographic healing occurred at a mean time of16.3 weeks (range 1224 weeks). Only one intraoperative complication occurred in our series (1.3 %) which did not lead to a delayed union (Table 1, group b); during fracture reduction, a dislocation of the nearby knee prosthesis increased surgery time and required post-operative

123

Strat Traum Limb Recon (2014) 9:1318 15

Table 1 Summary of the results

Group No of fracture (%)

Complication

(a) Union without complication 58 (75.3 %)

(b) Union with intraoperative complication

1 (1.3 %) 1 Knee prosthesis dislocation

(c) Union with late postoperative complication

9 (11.7 %) 2 Bone deformity/ stiff knee

5 Soft-tissue irritation

2 Stiff knee

(d) Complications of bone healing

9 (11.7 %) 1 Deep infection

1 Fracture

7 Non-union(9.1 %) Fig. 1 Female 86 years. a Insufcient plate length to x a distal femur fracture in a patient with a hip prosthesis. b Fracture occurred between the stem and plate; this was treated by a longer plate and cortical strut graft

immobilization. Eight patients with nine fractures (11.7 %) also had post-operative complications that had effect on healing (Table 1, group c).

One of these patients had mental health illness and had sustained bilateral distal femur fractures from self-injury. This was treated with temporary external xation followed by open reduction and internal xation. Ten weeks after surgery, complete loosening of the hardware was observed in the right femur due to plate malpositioning and required implant removal. It was then managed by cast immobilization for 6 weeks. The fractures nally healed with a signicant bone deformity on the right side and stiff knees in both lower limbs. This bedridden patient did not require other surgical procedures.

Five patients who reported pain and tissue irritation after fracture union underwent hardware removal with a corresponding decrease in symptoms except for one case with patello-femoral joint pain. Two patients underwent arthrolysis and quadricepsplasty for stiff knee problems after which a nal range of motion was recorded as complete extension to 90 degrees of knee exion.

Nine fractures (11.7 %) developed complications of bone healing (Table 1, group d): one deep infection, one fracture near the plate and seven with aseptic non-union.

One deep infection developed in our series despite a high percentage of open and high-energy injuries. This 76-year-old patient with a closed fracture (33-C2), affected by insulin-dependent diabetes and a severe peripheral neuropathy, had an early post-operative deep infection and opted for an above-the-knee amputation instead of limb salvage.

Another patient with a hip prosthesis presented a peri-prosthetic fracture because of a plate of insufcient length was used to x the fracture. He underwent revision surgery with a longer plate and a cortical strut graft to augment xation (Fig. 1a, b).

Non-union (Fig. 2a) occurred in seven patients(9.1 %). Four patients were treated at 36 weeks after the rst surgery with homoplastic cortical bone graft opposite to a new plate (Fig. 2b). In all cases, the rst implant was well xed at the time of removal with no evidence of screw loosening, toggle or loss of distal xation. Three of these patients healed after about 4 months after revision surgery (Fig. 2c). The fourth patient, a heavy smoker, underwent further surgery for persistence of non-union.

Two patients were treated with cancellous autograft 32 weeks after the rst surgery. Both cases healed at about3.5 months after second surgery (Fig. 3a, b). Another patient, in whom post-operative X-rays showed plate malpositioning, had with symptomatic severe knee pain. Subsequent image studies indicated insufcient healing progression with bone deformity. The clinical evaluation suggested a lesion of medial collateral ligament. This patient underwent conversion to an arthroplasty with a rotating hinge prosthesis about 6 months later.

Excluding the nine patients who did not heal after rst surgery and the patient with the history of mental health illness, the remaining 66 patients were assessed for outcome using the Knee Society clinical rating system and with X-rays at a mean follow-up of 77 weeks. The mean Knee Score at the time of the latest follow-up was 83 points (range 57100), and the mean Functional Score was 71.1 points (range 20100).

Being an observational study, it was not possible to determine pre-operative or other factors linked to healing and clinical outcome; this was due to the large number of variables examined about patient injury and treatment leading to a very heterogeneous sample.

123

16 Strat Traum Limb Recon (2014) 9:1318

Fig. 2 Male 46 years. a Non-union in a complex distal femur fracture. b Post-operative X-ray after revision surgery using homoplastic cortical strut and a new plate. c 1.5 years after second surgery with the AP view radiograph showing fracture healing

Fig. 3 Male 46 years. a AP view before second surgery shows a non-union. b Radiograph at last follow-up shows fracture healing

Eleven of these 66 fractures (16.7 %) had femoral malalignment of \10 (especially in varus) at post-operatively X-ray. At last follow-up, no loss reduction and fair clinical results were reported except in one patient with knee pain who underwent removal of hardware 13 months after surgery.

Discussion

Distal femoral fractures are challenging injuries despite improvements of xation techniques and plate designs. Some authors [20, 21] have demonstrated the ability of locked plates to absorb more energy before failure compared with angled blade plates or retrograde intramedullary nails, thereby having a lower incidence of loss of xation. Although no agreement exists on management of complex distal femoral fractures, the results reported by several authors [1, 2, 46, 8, 11, 22] suggest modern locking plates

represent an advance for xing different fracture patterns in this region. These include either high-energy fractures with severe bone comminution that may be further complicated through open injury, fractures in older people with poor bone quality and periprosthetic fractures.

The disadvantages of rst-generation locked plates include the uniaxial screw trajectories. These screws trajectories cannot account for differences in femoral anatomy, fracture patterns or variations in plate positioning. In recent studies, biomechanical characteristics of a polyaxial system were analysed in comparison with uniaxial rst-generation locking plates [15]. Despite the large forces applied, there were no failures of the polyaxial screwplate interface and screw angle did not reduce the overall strength of these constructs, hence lending support to the biomechanical effectiveness of polyaxial plate designs under axial loading.

This observational study reports the experience with the PolyaxTM Locked Plating System (DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) for treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures. Intraoperative advantages with variable axis screws [12, 23] include the possibility to reduce the effects of obstacles to adequate periarticular xation. Such devices allow maximal periarticular fragment xation through use of multiple screws or by the option to spread screws in a remote segment.

Clinical experience with this new type of locking construct is not widespread, and only a reports are available in the literature [12, 22]. Haidukewych et al. [12] reported a series of 56 periarticular knee fractures (including only 25 in the distal femur) treated by using the Polyax plate; fracture healing was achieved in 94 % of the cases with satisfactory clinical outcomes for most of patients. Other previously published studies of fractures of the distal femur treated with different kinds of locked plate [6, 8, 2429]

123

Strat Traum Limb Recon (2014) 9:1318 17

Table 2 Non-union of distal femur fractures treated with locking plates in different studies

Study No. of fractures % Non-unions

Fankhauser et al. [24] 30 0

Gaines et al. [25] 109 8

Kayali et al. [26] 27 0

Kregor et al. [6] 103 2

Markmiller et al. [27] 20 10

Schandelmaier et al. [8] 54 2

Schutz et al. [28] 52 4 Vallier et al. [29] 46 9

Current study 77 9.1

also demonstrated non-union rates similar to those in the current study (Table 2).

Our results are comparable to recent published series. This observational study has several limitations but most importantly is heterogeneity in the sample; there is a large number of differing variables in patient, injury characteristics and treatment pathways that make determination of factors that inuence healing and clinical outcome difcult. There is, in addition, a lack of a control group.

Conclusion

The results of this observational study indicate that a polyaxial locking plate offers clinical and radiographic outcomes similar to those treated with xed-trajectory locking plates but with greater xation versatility. The system provides a high degree of angular and axial stability in a series of complex distal femoral fractures.

Conict of interest The authors declare that they have no conict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript and no funds were received in support of this work. No benets in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

References

1. Cole PA, Zlowodzky M, Kregor PJ (2004) Treatment of proximal tibia fractures using the less invasive stabilization system (LISS): surgical experience and early clinical results in 77 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:528535

2. Collinge CA, Sanders RW (2000) Percutaneous plating in the lower extremity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:211216

3. Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tsch-erne H (1999) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does

percutaneous platin disrupt femoral blood supply less than traditional technique? J Orthop Trauma 13:4014064. Frigg R, Appenzeller A, Christensen R, Frenk A, Gilbert S, Schavan R (2001) The development of distal femur less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Injury 32(Suppl 3):2431

5. Jazrawi LM, Kummer FJ, Simon JA et al (2000) New technique for treatment of unstable distal femur fractures by locked double-plating: case report and biomechanical evaluation. J Trauma 48:8792

6. Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA (2004) Treatment of distal femur fracture using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:509520

7. Kregor PJ (2002) Distal femur fracture with complex articular involvement: management by articular exposure and submuscular xation. Orthop Clin North Am 33:153175

8. Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B, Grun OA, Krettek C (2001) Distal femoral fracture and LISS stabilization. Injury 32(Suppl 3):5563

9. Stover M (2001) Distal femoral fractures: current treatment, results and problems. Injury 32(Suppl 3):4854

10. Althausen PL, Lee MA, Finkemeier CG, Meehan JP, Rodrigo JJ (2003) Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods. J Arthroplasty 18:834839

11. Bong MR, Egol KA, Koval KJ et al (2002) Comparison of the LISS and retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for xation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:876881

12. Haidukewych G, Sems SA, Huebner D, Horwitz D, Levy B (2007) Results of polyaxial locked-plate xation of periarticular fractures of the knee. J Bone J Surg 89:614620

13. Haidukewych GJ (2004) Innovations in locking plate technology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:205212

14. Richter M, Wilke HJ, Kluger P, Claes L, Puhl W (1999) Bio-mechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal xation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two estabilished internal xation system. Spine 24:207212

15. Otto RJ, Berton RM, Bledsoe GJ (2009) Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a xed-angled locking plate for internal xation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23:645652

16. Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevenction of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-ve open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone J Surg Am 58:453458

17. Gupta RK, Rohilla RK, Sangwan K, Singh V, Walia S (2010) Locking plate xation in distal metaphyseal tibial fractures: series of 79 patients. Int Orthop 34(8):12851290

18. Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Gomez-Castresana F (2004) Internal xation of nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 419:1320

19. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:1314

20. Koval KJ, Hoehl JJ, Kummer FJ (1997) Distal femoral xation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate and the 95-degree blade plate. J Orthop Trauma 11:521524

21. Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Williamson S (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for internal xation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18:494502

22. Smith TO, Hedges C, MacNair R, Schankat K, Wimhurst JA (2009) The clinical and radiological outcomes of the LISS plate for distal femoral fractures: a systematic review. Injury 40(10): 10491063

123

18 Strat Traum Limb Recon (2014) 9:1318

23. Wilkens KJ, Curtiss S, Lee MA (2008) Polyaxial locking plate xation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison. J Orthop Trauma 22:624628

24. Fankhauser F, Gruber G, Schippinger G et al (2004) Minimal-invasive treatment of distal femoral fractures with the LISS (less invasive stabilization system): a prospective study of 30 fractures with a follow up of 20 months. Acta Orthop Scand 75:5660

25. Gaines RJ, Sanders R, Sagi HC, Haidukewych GJ (2008) Titanium versus stainless steel locked plates for distal femur fractures: is there any difference? OTA abstract. Paper Number 55

26. Kayali C, Agus H, Turgut A (2007) Successful results of minimally invasive surgery for comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures with LISS: comparative study of multiply injured and isolated femoral fractures. J Orthop Sci 12(5):458465

27. Markmiller M, Konrad G, Sudkamp N (2004) Femur-LISS and distal femoral nail for xation of distal femoral fractures: are there differences in outcome and complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:252257

28. Schutz M, Muller M, Regazzoni P et al (2005) Use of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) in patients with distal fem-oral (AO33) fractures: a prospective multicenter study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:102108

29. Vallier HA, Hennessey TA, Sontich JK, Patterson BM (2006) Failure of LCP condylar plate xation in the distal part of the femur: a report of 6 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:846853

123