Adaptive space-time-frequency-coded UWB system for wireless body area network

Abstract

Wireless body area networks (WBAN) emerge as one of the main research streams for future wireless communications. One of the candidates for the WBAN physical layer is multiband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing ultra-wideband (MB-OFDM UWB) technology. However, despite its high data rate feature, it performs poorly in the very dispersive WBAN channel. To improve its performance, this paper proposes two novel mechanisms. First, the space-time-frequency coding (STFC) is introduced into MB-OFDM UWB system in order to enhance the diversity order, resulting in a substantial improvement in the average error performance compared to the conventional MB-OFDM UWB system. Nevertheless, the performance is very sensitive to the body orientation towards the transmitter due to the body shadowing effect. Secondly, to improve further the performance of the proposed STFC MB-OFDM UWB system in all body directions, we propose an adaptive scheme that changes the modulation, STFC coding rate, and constellation power. Simulations confirm that an additional improvement in the order of 1 to 3 dB is achieved by the adaptive system. This improvement practically means a possible 12.5% to 50% reduction of the power consumption, which may also result in smaller size of WBAN devices.

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications

and Networking (2015) 2015:36

DOI 10.1186/s13638-014-0235-8

RESEARCH Open Access

Adaptive space-time-frequency-coded UWB system for wireless body area network

Miftadi Sudjai*, Le Chung Tran and Farzad Safaei

Abstract

Wireless body area networks (WBAN) emerge as one of the main research streams for future wireless communications. One of the candidates for the WBAN physical layer is multiband orthogonal frequency division multiplexing ultra-wideband (MB-OFDM UWB) technology. However, despite its high data rate feature, it performs poorly in the very dispersive WBAN channel. To improve its performance, this paper proposes two novel mechanisms. First, the space-time-frequency coding (STFC) is introduced into MB-OFDM UWB system in order to enhance the diversity order, resulting in a substantial improvement in the average error performance compared to the conventional MB-OFDM UWB system. Nevertheless, the performance is very sensitive to the body orientation towards the transmitter due to the body shadowing effect. Secondly, to improve further the performance of the proposed STFC MB-OFDM UWB system in all body directions, we propose an adaptive scheme that changes the modulation, STFC coding rate, and constellation power. Simulations confirm that an additional improvement in the order of 1 to 3 dB is achieved by the adaptive system. This improvement practically means a possible 12.5% to 50% reduction of the power consumption, which may also result in smaller size of WBAN devices.

Keywords: Adaptive system; MB-OFDM UWB; Space-time-frequency codes; WBAN

1 Introduction

There have been active engagements in the wireless body area network (WBAN) research in recent years.One of the key factors for the emergence of WBANs is the development of advanced, tiny-sized, lightweight, and extremely low power implantable and wearable sensors [1]. In addition, body centric radio propagation measurement campaigns and WBAN channel modelling have been robustly fostering research activities on WBAN technologies and standards. In particular, WBAN is capable of alleviating the hurdle and inflexibility of cable-connected devices for, e.g., real-time monitoring of health conditions, via various implantable and wearable wireless sensors.

WBAN itself is a network of sensors or communicating devices placed in, on, or off the body to monitor physiological activities and motions and communicate the data between those devices and/or to external devices.Numerous research publications and proposals of WBAN have been put forward, e.g., [1] and [2]. In order to

harmonize the development of WBAN, IEEE set up a technical group TG6 within 802.15 to standardize the WBAN in November 2007. IEEE 802.15 TG6 released the WBAN standard in February 2012 that includes the impulse radio ultra wideband (IR-UWB) as its physical layer [3]. Prior to this standard, IEEE also released the WBAN channel models that defined four different channel conditions, i.e., CM1 to CM4, in which CM4 models the body-to-external link [2].

Another competing technology for a short range, very high data-rate communication is multi band orthogonal frequency division multiplexing ultra-wideband (MBOFDM UWB), endorsed by the WiMedia Alliance [4,5]. It combines the capability of OFDM to flatten the response of dispersive, frequency selective channels of UWB, while maintaining the benefit of high capacity of UWB. It is designed to operate at up to 1 Gbps, at low cost and with low power consumption.

Meanwhile, multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technology is proven to be able to significantly increase the wireless system capacity for the same total transmission power [6]. Its fundamental mechanism lies on the use of space-time coding (STC) [6-9]. In STCs, signals are

* Correspondence: mailto:[email protected]

Web End [email protected] School of Electrical, Computer, and Telecommunications Engineering (SECTE), University of Wollongong, Northfield Avenue, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia

2015 Sudjai et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0

Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 2 of 11

coded both in spatial and temporal domains, for example, using the Alamouti code [9] or other similar codes [7-9]. Alamouti code is designed for frequency flat fading and is capable of providing full rate and full diversity for up to two Tx and two Rx antennas. As a result, it enhances the diversity order and improves the link quality and capacity.

However, its direct application for a very dispersive UWB WBAN channel may not be suitable. Therefore, in order to attain higher data rates and capitalize on the rich dispersion of UWB WBAN channels, further addition of the frequency domain processing in STC can be deployed. So, the process becomes space-time-frequency coding (STFC). Readers may refer to [10-17] for more details about STFCs and its comparison with STC. It is intuitive that a STFC MB-OFDM UWB system may provide better link performance and higher data rate and system capacity. Hence, in [18], we proposed the combination of STFC and MB-OFDM UWB, referred to as the STFC MB-OFDM UWB, as an improved physical layer for WBAN.

Radio propagation in, on, and surrounding a human body is greatly affected by environment, posture, activities, and human tissue [19-24]. Numerous measurement campaigns on body centric propagations have been conducted to characterize the body centric channel, including UWB channels in the frequency bands of 3.1 to 10.6 GHz. Takada et al. show that the body centric channel varies according to the type of antennas, the position and orientation of antennas with respect to the body, the posture and motion of the body, and the variation of the human body itself [19]. Wang et al. suggest that the body shadowing is a prominent factor in short-range body-centric communications [20]. The effect of locations of on-body devices, body size as well as the movement of the body is investigated in [21-24]. Finally, the aforementioned IEEE 802.15 TG6 in [2] has summarized and proposed four channel models CM1 to CM4 for UWB WBAN channels, which comprise seven scenarios. CM1 considers implant-to-implant link for medical information and communication science (MICS). CM2 determines implant-to-body surface and implant-to-external links operating in the same frequency band as CM1. CM3 considers body-to-body link, while CM4 considers body-to-external link. Both CM3 and CM4 are proposed to operate in UWBs. Due to our focus on the UWB WBAN system, we will only consider CM3 and CM4 in this paper.

It is important to highlight the main differences between UWB channel models for wireless personal area networks (WPANs) [25,26] and the aforementioned UWB WBAN channel. The WPAN channel models are based on the Saleh-Valenzuela model and do not consider the effect of human body, while the UWB WBAN channel models do. It is clearly shown in [2] that due to

the shadowing effect of human body, the UWB WBAN channel produces a larger amplitude standard deviation and a much greater exponential decay factor compared to the UWB WPAN channel. Moreover, varies significantly for different body directions with respect to the transmitter in the case of CM4 over the UWB WBAN channel. To the best of our knowledge, the performance analysis of a STFC MB-OFDM UWB system implemented in the WBAN channels has not been deeply explored. Thus, in [18] as previously mentioned, we present the performance analysis of STFC MB-OFDM UWB in CM3 and CM4 WBAN channels using the Alamouti code. One important observation drawn from this work is that the average error performance differs significantly in different body directions, i.e., the direction of the receiver placed on the surface of the body with respect to (w.r.t) the transmitter. This is due to the effects of line-of-sight (LOS), partial LOS, and body shadowing. These facts lead to the idea of adding an adaptive scheme to WBAN systems, in order to further improve their performance in all body directions.

Adaptive techniques have been employed for numerous systems and applications [27-31]. For instance, Czylwik proposed an adaptive modulation for individual subcarriers of an OFDM system [27]. Keller and Hanzo investigated adaptive OFDM with the focus on the trade-off between the performance and throughput [28]. They also presented a number of adaptive OFDM techniques and their performances [29]. In [30], the authors examined a unified adaptive modulation scheme for a general communication system where the data rate, transmitted power, and instantaneous BER are varied to maximize spectral efficiency. A cross layer adaptive modulation to minimize the transmission energy in wireless sensor networks is proposed in [31]. However, an adaptive scheme for the WBAN physical layer has not been examined. Henceforth, this paper proposes for the first time a body direction-based adaptive algorithm for STFC MB-OFDM UWB WBAN, in order to improve the average BER performance and/or reduce the power consumption of the body-to-external link for WBAN applications [32]. The core idea is that a combination of different digital modulation schemes (binary phase shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK)), powers of signal constellations, and different rate STFCs is adaptively selected, depending on the body direction w.r.t. the transmitter. The adaption is carried out by the measurement of angles of the body w.r.t. the transmitter, e.g., by utilize a magnetic sensor [33]. The angle information is then fed back to the transmitter via a simple feedback loop to vary its modulation, STFC coding rate, and constellation power. We demonstrate that an additional improvement in the order of 1 to 3 dB can be achieved with this scheme. The improvement practically means a possible 12.5% to

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 3 of 11

50% further reduction of the total transmitted power, compared to the non-adaptive system. In other words, the adaptive scheme can significantly reduce the power consumption and dimension of WBAN devices.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 reviews the UWB WBAN channel models. Section 3 analyzes the proposed system model, including the adaptive algorithm and its decoding complexity. Simulation results and analyses are presented in Section 4. Section 5 concludes the paper.

1.1 Review of IEEE UWB WBAN channel models Yazdandoost and Sayrafian presented the final document of the IEEE 802.15 TG6 channel modelling subcommittee, providing channel models to be used in body area networks [2]. The channel models are used as a common platform for evaluating the performance of the physical layer from various proposals and measurement campaigns.

The channel models are drawn from three possible types of nodes, namely implant nodes, body surface nodes, and external nodes. Implant nodes are implanted below the skin or inside the human body. Body surface nodes are placed on the surface of the human skin or at most 2 cm away, and external nodes are placed between a few centimeters and up to 5 m away from the body. Figure 1 shows the possible communication links between the nodes and the defined channel models CM1 to CM4. CM1 defines an implant-to-implant link (scenario 1, denote S1) operating in the MICS band (402 to 405 MHz). CM2 determines implant-to-body surface (S2) and implant-to-external (S3) links, operating in the same band as CM1. CM3 defines a body surface-to-body surface link for both LOS (S4) and non-line-of-sight (NLOS) (S5) scenarios. CM3 is intended to operate in seven different bands, including the UWB band (3.1 to10.6 GHz). CM4 determines a body surface-to-external link for both LOS (S6) and NLOS (S7). It is applied to three different frequency bands, including the UWB band. In this work, we only consider CM3 and CM4 for the UWB band.

1.2 Review of CM3 channel modelThe CM3 for the UWB band is derived from a measurement campaign in a hospital room environment. The channel response is characterized by a power delay profile (PDP) as follows [2]:

h t

XL1l0al exp jl t tl 1

10 log10 al

p tl tl1 exp tltl1

j

p L

j j2

0;l0

010 log10 exp tl

S l 0

LL exp

L

L!

where l is the path amplitude, tl is the path arrival time, and l is the phase for the lth path with an uniform distribution over [0, 2], respectively. L is the number of arrival paths with average

L. (t) is the Dirac function, is an exponential decay with a Rician factor 0, S is a

normally distributed random variable with zero-mean and standard deviation of S, and is the path arrival rate. The parameters of CM3 are presented in Table 1.

1.3 Review of CM4 channel modelThe CM4 model is based on office environment measurements in which the Tx antenna is fixed near to the wall, while the Rx antenna is placed at different positions on the human body. The effect of ground is considered in measurements. The channel response is characterized by the following PDP [2]

h t

XL1m0m tm 2

where

j j2 oe

m

k 1 m

m

k k

ln10 10

lognormal 0;

; o d=c; and e

m is the amplitude of each path; m, m = 1, , L 1, is the path arrival time; L is the number of the arrival paths modelled as a Poisson random variable with the mean

Table 1 Parameters of CM3 channel [2]

Main parameter Corresponding parameter Values al 0 4.60 dB

59.7S 5.02 dB tl 1

= 1.85 ns L L 38.1

Figure 1 Communication links and channel models.

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 4 of 11

value of 400, 0 is the path loss; k is the K-factor (NLOS), d is the Tx-Rx distance, and c is the velocity of light.

The parameters of CM4 also depend on the direction of body toward the Tx antenna and listed in Table 2.

From Table 2, the worst link is corresponding to the 270 body direction, rather than 180, which may be rather counter-intuitive, and the channel behaviors of the 90 and 270 are significantly different. This might possibly be due to the different surrounding environments of the 90 and 270 directions during the measurement. This observation will be reflected in our simulation results.

1.4 System model1.4.1 STFC MB-OFDM UWB WBAN system with simple adaptive schemeFigure 2 depicts our proposed STFC MIMO-OFDM UWB system with M-Tx antennas, N-Rx antennas, and a simple adaptive scheme. The data stream d(n) undergoes convolutional coding and interleaving, before being mapped to symbols. The body direction estimator measures the orientation of the body w.r.t. the transmitter. The angular information is then fed back to the transmitter via a simple feedback loop in order to adjust its modulation, constellation power, and STFC coding rate accordingly. The adaptive modulation block selects either QPSK or BPSK, while the power control block adjusts the constellation power based on certain rules as detailed in the next section. For a fair comparison, those parameters are adaptively varied in a way that the average total power and total data rate over all four body directions are exactly the same as those in a non-adaptive system. The stream of modulated symbols is then converted by a serial-to-parallel (S/P) block into the symbol blocks (or vectors)

x x1; x2; ; xNfft

T, where Nfft is the fast Fourier trans

form (FFT)/inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) size.

The adaptive STFC block creates a space-time-frequency code with either a full rate or a 3/2-rate. For the full rate, it uses the Alamouti code [6] to convert the two consecutive symbol blocks, denoted as x1 and x2 , into a STFC block as follows:

X xt;m

T M

Figure 2 STFC MB-OFDM UWB system with simple adaptive

scheme.

where x1 and x2 are symbol vectors transmitted from the first and the second antenna at a given time slot, respectively. ( )* denotes complex conjugate. For 3/2-rate STFC, three symbol vectors are encoded following the Sezginer-Sari code [7]:

X xt;m

2

664

2 a x2

b x3

2

b x3

p c x 2

T M

d x 3

2

3

775

a x1

p

p c x 1

d x 3

2

p

4

where a, b, c, and d are complex-valued parameters. Here, we use the optimal parameters a c 2

p and

as determined in [7].

We denote the matrix X in the general form as X

xt;m

T M, where the index t indicates the time slot and

m indicates the mth Tx antenna. Each of the symbol vectors in the matrix X is then converted into an Nfft-point

MB- OFDM symbol by the IFFT block, resulting in the STFC code matrix XOFDM whose elements are the Nfft-

point IFFT of the corresponding symbol vectors xt;m in

X. Hence, the transmitted matrix of STFC MB-OFDM symbols is:

XOFDM xOFDM;t;m

b d 1 j

p

=4

7

T M IFFT xt;m

T M 5

The actual transmitted matrix is denoted as XZP whose elements are the Nfft-length vectors xOFDM;t;m in

XOFDM appended with the 37 samples zero-padded suffix (ZPS), denoted as xZP;t;m. ZPS is used here instead

of cyclic prefix (CP) due to the fact that adding CP to an OFDM symbol will introduce redundancy into the transmitted signal. The CP produces correlation in the transmitted signal, which results in ripples in the average power spectral density (PSD) of MB-OFDM UWB system that could be as high as 1.5 dB [14]. This

x1 x2

x 2 x 1

3

Table 2 Parameters of CM4 channel [2]

Body direction (ns) k (k (dB)) (dB) 0 44.6364 5.111 (22.2) 7.30 90 54.2868 4.348 (18.8) 7.08 180 53.4186 3.638 (15.8) 7.03 270 83.9635 3.983 (17.3) 7.19

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 5 of 11

matrix, and N nt;n

problem might force power back off at the MB-OFDM UWB transmitter, hence reducing the transmission range. When a ZPS is used, ripples in the PSD can be reduced significantly, thus the power back off problem at the transmitter can be mitigated and the system can achieve the maximum possible range. So, the transmitted signal becomes:

XZP xZP;t;m

T M 6

The channels between M-Tx and N-Rx antennas are defined as the channel matrix H:

H

T N the matrix of noise. Then,

we can rewrite (9) as:

R X H N 11

where () denotes the operation which is similar to the normal matrix multiplication, except that each element in R is determined by (9). Thus, the detected

vectors are decided by the following maximum likelihood (ML) rule:

xt;m

n o

arg min

xt;m

RXH2F 12

Since the matrix X preserves its orthogonality in the similar manner as in a conventional STBC MIMO system, the STFC MB-OFDM UWB system can also employ a simple linear decoding process [14,15]. For simplicity, we can omit the time index t. Hence, in the 2I1O (2-input 1-output, i.e., by using two Tx antennas and one Rx antenna) configuration with M-PSK modulation, we have the following decoding metrics:

x1 arg min

xCN

D

2

4

3

5

h1;1

hM;1

f g

h1;N

hM;N

7

where

hm;n is the channel coefficient vector between the mth Tx antenna, for m = 1, 2, , M, and the nth Rx antenna, n = 1, 2, , N, containing L multipaths. The distribution and parameters of

hm;n are determined by Equation 1 and Table 1.

The received signal at the nth Rx antenna during the tth transmitted OFDM symbol duration is computed as:

rt;n

XMm1 xZP;t;m hm;n

h 1 r1

h2 r 2

x2F

nt;n 8

where (*) denotes the linear convolution, xZP;t;m is the

MB-OFDM symbol including ZPS transmitted from the mth Tx antenna, and

nt;n is the zero mean additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) vector. The ZPS is removed by an overlap-and-add-operation (OAAO) prior to the FFT operation. After performing OAAO, the received signal can be written as:

rOFDM;t;n

XMm1 xOFDM;t;m hm;n nt;n 9

where denotes circular convolution. After the FFT block, the output signals of the STFC decoder are calculated as:

rt;n

13

where ND is the number of data subcarriers (ND = 100, according to the standard [4]), and CND denotes the ND-

dimensional complex space of the transmitted vector x. For the 2I2O (2-input 2-output, i.e., by using two Tx antennas and two Rx antenna) configuration, the decoding metrics are:

x1 arg min

xCND

h 11 r11

x2 arg min

xCN

D

h 2 r1 h1 r 2

x2F

h i

2 F

x

h21 r 21

h 12 r12

h22 r 22

:2

x2 arg min

xCN

D

h i

2 F

h 22 r12 h12 r 22

x

h 21 r11 h11 r 21

:2

XMm1 xt;m hm;n nt;n 10

where () denotes the Hardamard product between the vectors, rt;n FFT rOFDM;t;n

rm;n;1 ; ; rm;n;Nfft

T

14

More importantly, each data point in an MB-OFDM symbol can be decoded separately rather than jointly[14], thus the decoding process is significantly simplified. In particular, the decoding metrics of each data at the kth subcarrier (k = 1, , ND) in the MB-OFDM symbols for the 2I1O configuration are:

~x1;k arg min

x1;kC

1;kr1;k 2;kr 2;k

,

xt;m is original modulation symbols, hm;n FFT

hmn

m;n;1 ; ; m;n;Nf f t

T

, and nt;n FFT

~x2;k arg min

2

x1;k

nt;n

:

Denote

R rt;n

T N to be the matrix of the received signals

2

15

x1;k

after FFT, H

M N to be the channel response

x2;kC

2;kr1;k 1;kr 2;k

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 6 of 11

Similarly, for the 2I2O configuration, the decoding metrics are:

~x1;k arg min

x1;kC

X2n1 1;n;kr1;n;k 2;n;kr 2;n;k

" #

2

x1;k

" #

16

For the 3/2-rate STFC, we follow the decoding process mentioned in [7]. Generalization for the case of M-Tx and N-Rx antennas is straightforward.

1.5 Adaptive selection algorithmAs mentioned previously, adaptive modulation and coding schemes have not been examined for WBANs using STFC MB-OFDM UWB technology, though they have been intensively researched for other systems. This section proposes for the first time a simple-but-efficient adaptive modulation and space-time-frequency coding scheme for such a system. The adaptive scheme is controlled by the measurement of the angular direction of the body. Depending on which region among the three regions shown in Figure 3 the current body direction belongs to, the corresponding 2-bit angular information is fed back to the transmitter to select a suitable combination of its modulation, STFC coding rate, and constellation power. It is noted that the three regions in Figure 3 have been derived based on our observations that the

best channel behavior is corresponding to the 0 direction, while the 90 and 180 directions possess relatively close error performances, and the worst channel behavior is the 270 direction.

Either QPSK or BPSK is used for modulation. We use two different STFC coding rates, namely coding rate 1 which uses the Alamouti full rate code, and coding rate 3/2 which uses the Sezginer-Sari 3/2 rate code. The normalized transmitted constellation power may take one of the three values 0.5, 1, and 1.5. The selection of the adaptive scheme is done in a way that the average data rate and total transmitted power over all main four directions of the body are maintained exactly equal to those in a non-adaptive system (rate 1 STFC, constellation power 1, and QPSK modulation for all four directions) for a fair comparison. This is done as follows.

1. Data rate constraint: the lowest density signal constellation (BPSK) is used for the worst link (270) in order to improve the system error performance over this direction. A higher density constellation (QPSK) is used for all other three directions. The highest rate STFC (rate 3/2) is selected for the best link (0) while the rate 1 STFC is selected for all three remaining directions. Thus, the average spectrum efficiency over the four main directions is maintained at2 bits/s/Hz which is exactly the same as that in the non-adaptive system.

2. Power constraint: the normalized power of oneis selected for the signal constellations (QPSK) for the 90 and 180 directions, similar to that in the non-adaptive system, while the highest power level (1.5) is selected for the best link (0) to compensate for the possible performance degradation caused by the highest STFC coding rate (3/2) chosen for this direction. The above power allocation leaves the power of 0.5 for the BPSK signal constellation in the 270 direction. Thus, the total transmitted power over allfour main directions is exactly the same as thatin the non-adaptive system.

The core idea behind the proposed algorithm is that the best channel conveys the most information with the most power allocated while the worse link carries the least information. Hence, we define three sets of adaptive schemes (see Figure 3). Set 1 is aimed to take advantage of the best channel link by maximizing the capacity, i.e., by using the QPSK modulation, STFC code rate 3/2, and normalized power Tx 1.5. Set 2 uses QPSK, STFC code rate 1, and power Tx 1, and set 3 uses BPSK, STFC code rate 1, and power

~x2;k arg min

x2;kC

X2n1 2;n;kr1;n;k1;n;kr 2;n;k

2

x2;k

Figure 3 Angular direction boundaries for adaptive decision.

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 7 of 11

Tx 0.5. The proposed algorithm is summarized as follows:

1.6 Decoding complexityLet P be the constellation size of the P-PSK modulator used in sets 1 and 2 (here, we used QPSK, so P is equal to 4). As a result, the constellation size of the BPSK modulator used in set 3 is P/2. The decoding process of set 1 with QPSK and 3/2 rate STFC is as follows: the decoder firstly has to determine ~x3 from four possible symbols in QPSK, prior to decoding ~x1 and ~x2 symbols. Then, ~x1 and ~x2 are decoded independently, given ~x3 is known, for every QPSK constellation. Hence, the ML decoding complexity is the decoding complexity of ~x3 ,

which is in the order of P, added with the complexity of two independent decoding processes of ~x1 and ~x2 given ~x3 is known, which is equal to 2P. Thus, the overall decoding complexity is in the order of 3P, which is consistent with the analysis in [7]. Set 2 uses a QPSK modulator with the full rate Alamouti code as the STFC. The symbols ~x1 and ~x2 are decoded independently for every constellation, leading to a 2P-decoding complexity. Set 3 uses the full rate Alamouti code in which ~x1 and ~x2 symbols are decoded independently for every BPSK constellation point. Therefore, the ML decoding complexity in set 3 is 2 P2 P:

There are four possible body directions with three possible adaptive schemes. If the four body directions are

assumed to be equiprobable, i.e., the probability of each possible direction is 0.25, with the note that set 2 is used for two body directions, the overall complexity of the ML decoding process in the proposed adaptive scheme is 0.25(3P) + 0.5(2P) + 0.25(P) or 2P, beside the body direction estimation. It can be inferred that the ML decoding complexity in our adaptive approach is in the order of P or O(P). It is obvious that the complexity of this adaptive system only linearly increases with respect to the number of signal constellations, thanks to relatively simple decoding processes.

For the body direction estimation, a simple direction sensor, e.g., by using a giant magneto resistance (GMR) thin film sensor chip [33], can be used. It is a robust magnetic sensor, which is capable to provide 360-angular measurements. The measured body direction is not fed back directly to the transmitter. Instead, depending on which region among the three pre-defined regions shown in Figure 3 this body direction belongs to, 2-bit angular information will be fed back to the transmitter to indicate this region in order for the transmitter to select the corresponding combination of modulation, STFC structure, and constellation power. In other words, the proposed adaptive scheme could be implemented with only minor increase in system complexity.

1.7 Performance evaluationsThe performance of a STFC MB-OFDM UWB system with and without the adaptive scheme will be examined in comparison with a conventional MB-OFDM UWB system in WBAN channel. The performance in terms of BER is assessed for three different configurations, i.e., single-input single-output (SISO), 2I1O, and 2I2O, assuming perfect channel state estimations be available at the receiver. The total transmitted power from all Tx antennas is kept equal at all times in all configurations, in order to fairly compare their performances. Channel coefficients are assumed to be constant during two consecutive OFDM symbols, i.e., during each STFC block, but random between consecutive STFC blocks. Other simulation parameters are listed in Table 3.

The performances of the proposed STFC MB-OFDM UWB and of the conventional (SISO) MB-OFDM UWB system for the CM3 WBAN channel, with the QPSK modulation, are compared in Figure 4. The average transmitted powers are kept the same for both systems, by scaling down the symbol power in the STFC MB-OFDM UWB by a factor of 2. Figure 4 shows that the improvement of at least 5 and 10 dB can be achieved at BER = 104 in the

2I1O and 2I2O STFC MB-OFDM UWB systems, respectively, compared to the conventional MB-OFDM. Thus, the proposed STFC MB-OFDM UWB provides superior performance over the conventional MB-OFDM, thanks to the higher diversity order introduced by the STFC [14].

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 8 of 11

Table 3 Simulation parameters

Parameters Value FFT and IFFT size Nfft 128

Number of ZPS NZPS 37

Convolutional coder (K = 7) rate One-halfConvolutional decoder and mode Viterbi, hard Interleaver/de-interleaver Column-wise written, row-wise read Average number of paths in CM3 38Average number of paths in CM4 400Body directions 0, 90, 180, 270

Figure 5 compares the performance of the proposed STFC MB-OFDM UWB WBAN system in CM3, using BPSK, QPSK, and 8PSK modulations, for both MIMO configurations. It clearly shows that the system can achieve a good BER performance from a reasonably low Eb/N0 range in both MIMO configurations, even if we use 8PSK modulation. For example, a BER of 104 can

be attained at Eb/N0 = 4.8 dB for 2I2O-QPSK, 8.5 dB for 2I2O-8PSK, 10.2 dB for 2I1O-QPSK, and 14 dB for 2I1O-8PSK. Beside the diversity order introduced by STFC, the reason for this good performance is that the length of zero-padded suffix NZPS = 37 is close enough

to the mean number of multipaths in CM3, i.e.,

L 38

(cf. Table 1). Therefore, the system experiences frequency flat fading channels. Significant improvement of at least 6 dB is shown in 2I2O, compared to 2I1O at BER = 104. In addition, the system performance improves by 2 to 4 dB, if we employ lower level M-PSK modulations. In particular, BPSK and QPSK modulations provide 6 and 4 dB better performances compared to 8PSK, respectively. As a result, BPSK and QPSK are of

particular interest and are used as the two main modulation constellations in our proposed adaptive scheme.

The effect of body directions to the system performance in the CM4 channel is depicted in Figure 6. In this simulation, we use the IEEE 802.15 TG6 WBAN channel model [2]. According to [2], which is based on an extensive measurement campaign in the office environment for medical applications, different orientation angles of the body cause different channel behaviors due to the possible change of propagation environment and the effect of body shadowing. This channel model reveals that the channel characteristics are worst in the 270 direction and that the channel parameters of the 90 and 270 angles are different. These facts might be because of the surrounding environments varied and/or the asymmetric radiation patterns of the antennas used in the campaign.

Figure 5 Performance of STFC MB-OFDM in CM3 WBAN channel

with various M-PSK modulations.

Figure 4 Performance comparison between STFC MB-OFDM

and conventional MB-OFDM in CM3 WBAN channel.

Figure 6 Performance of STFC MB-OFDM in CM4 WBAN channel

for various body directions with Q-PSK modulation.

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 9 of 11

The performance comparison in Figure 6 reveals a significant degradation in the BER performance when the receiver (on the body) turns away from the transmitter. The front body (0 direction) has a LOS component, which results in the best performance compared to other directions. The back of the body (180 direction) suffers from a body shadowing effect, and the receiver only receives NLOS multipath signals. Nonetheless, the performance is still reasonably good, particularly with the 2I2O configuration, compared to the 270 direction. Its performance degrades 3.5 dB at BER = 103, compared to the front body. The 270 direction experiences the worst performance, and its performance is different from the performance of the 90 direction. This observation is consistent with the parameters of CM4 mentioned in Section 2.2. The average BER performance for each MIMO configuration shown by the dash-dotted curves in Figure 6 is calculated over four body directions. They are used as the benchmark for comparison with the adaptive system.

Figure 6 also shows the presence of error floors, where further increasing Eb/N0 does not bring about a significant improvement. This is due to the fact that the ZPS is much shorter than the channel length in the very dispersive CM4 channel. Thus, the inter-symbol interference (ISI) cannot be overcome completely. The residual ISI is still large enough to neutralize the performance. This is the reason why the MB-OFDM technique has been proposed where consecutive MB-OFDM symbols are transmitted over different radio frequencies (RF), thus avoiding the residual ISI. For simplicity, simulations are run here in the baseband rather than in the RF band, thus the error floors can be observed. In other words, the performance provided in the paper works as the lower bound for the improvement that could be provided by the proposed system.

It is worth to note that while the particular level of performance improvement achieved by the proposed adaptive approach might vary should a different channel model be used, the overall idea of the proposed approach (probably with slight modifications) could be still valid for other channel models.

To further improve the performance of the proposed STFC UWB WBANs, the proposed adaptive modulation and space-time-frequency coding scheme is implemented. Figure 7 shows the improvement gained by the adaptive scheme, compared to the non-adaptive one, in both 2I1O and 2I2O configurations. The average BER of the adaptive scheme shown by a circled solid line is consistently better than that of the non-adaptive one by about 1 to 2 dB in a 2I1O configuration and about 1 to 3 dB in a 2I2O configuration in the medium-to-high SNR region. If we compare the average BER of the adaptive scheme with the BER of the worst scenario (270 direction) in the non-adaptive one (cf. square-marked curves in Figure 6), the improvement is significantly higher, i.e., 5.5 dB at BER 5 102 in the 2I1O configuration and 6 dB at BER 4 104 in the 2I2O case. Comparing to the BER of the best link (0 direction, cross-marked curves in Figure 6) of the non-adaptive system in both MIMO configurations, as expected, the averaged BER of the adaptive scheme is slightly worse. This is because the adaptive system selects the highest STFC coding rate (3/2) for the 0 direction in order to maximize the capacity, with a price of minor performance degradation compared to the best performance scenario in the non-adaptive case.

It is noted that the aforementioned average BER improvements are achieved without any increase of the total transmitted power or any sacrifice of the data rate. In other words, an improvement in the order of 1 to 3 dB means a possible reduction of 12.5% to 50% of the total transmitted power, while maintaining the same

A B

Figure 7 Performances of adaptive scheme in CM4 WBAN channel (A) 2I1O configuration and (B) 2I2O configuration.

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 10 of 11

BER performance and data rate as in the non-adaptive STFC MB-OFDM UWB system. Due to the fact that power is the main constraint in WBAN applications [1], this power saving will significantly reduce the total power consumption of a WBAN system and/or reduces the dimension of WBAN devices.

2 Conclusions

This paper proposes a STFC MB-OFDM UWB system as an alternative high data-rate physical layer for a WBAN system. The results confirm that the proposed system can achieve significantly better BER performances, compared to the conventional MB-OFDM system. To improve the performance of STFC MB-OFDM UWB systems further, a simple body direction-based adaptive modulation and coding scheme is proposed. This adaptive scheme brings about an additional improvement in the order of 1 to 3 dB. Those improvements practically mean a possible 12.5% to 50% reduction of the total transmitted power, hence reducing the dimension of WBAN devices and prolonging their battery life. We conclude that, with the price of slightly increased complexity, the proposed systems could be an effective solution to achieve a power saving and better average BER performance for WBAN applications without sacrificing the data rate. Our future work will focus on the adaptive scheme driven by the measured signal quality in the receiver.

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AcknowledgementsThe first author is grateful to the AusAID that provides financial support through the Australian Development Scholarship (ADS) scheme. The authors also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for insightful feedbacks.

Received: 5 January 2014 Accepted: 24 December 2014

References1. M Chen, S Gozalez, A Vasilakos, H Cao, VCM Leung, Body area networks: a survey. J. Mobile Netw. App. 16(2), 171193 (2010)

2. KY Yazdandoost, K Sayrafian-Pour, Channel model for body area network (BAN). IEEE 802.15 Working Group Document, IEEE P802.15-08-0780-12-0006, 2010

3. IEEE Computer Society, IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks-part 15.6: wireless body area networks (IEEE, New York, 2012)

4. WiMedia Alliance, Multiband OFDM physical layer specification.(Final Deliverable 1.5, Aug 2009), http://www.wimedia.org/en/docs/10003r02WM_CRB-WiMedia_PHY_Spec_1.5.pdf

Web End =http://www.wimedia.org/en/docs/ http://www.wimedia.org/en/docs/10003r02WM_CRB-WiMedia_PHY_Spec_1.5.pdf

Web End =10003r02WM_CRB-WiMedia_PHY_Spec_1.5.pdf . accessed 25 Sep 2011

5. WP Siriwongpairat, W Su, M Olfat, KJR Liu, Multiband-OFDM MIMO coding framework for UWB communication systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 54(1), 214224 (2006)

6. SM Alamouti, A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 16(8), 14511458 (1998)

7. S Sezginer, H Sari, A high-rate full-diversity 2 2 space-time code with simple maximum likelihood decoding (Paper presented at the International Symposium on Signal Proceesing and Information Technology, IEEE, Giza, 2007), pp. 11321136

8. LC Tran, J Seberry, BJ Wysocki, TA Wysocki, T Xia, Y Zhao, Two new complex orthogonal space-time codes for 8 transmit antennas. IEE Electron. Lett. 40(1), 5556 (2004)

9. LC Tran, A Mertins, TA Wysocki, Quasi-orthogonal space-time-frequency codes in MB-OFDM UWB. Elsevier J. Comput. Electric. Engin.36(4), 766774 (2010)

10. LC Tran, A Mertins, E Dutkiewicz, X Huang, Space-time-frequency codes in MB-OFDM UWB communications: advanced order-8 STFC and its performance (Paper presented at the International Symposium on Communication and Information Technology, IEEE, Sydney, 2007), pp. 380385

11. AF Molisch, MZ Win, JH Winters, Space-time-frequency (STF) coding for MIMO-OFDM systems. IEEE Commun. Lett. 6(9), 370372 (2002)

12. M Fozunbal, SW McLaughlin, RW Schafer, On space-time frequency coding over MIMO-OFDM systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 4(1), 320331 (2005)

13. LC Tran, TA Wysocki, A Mertins, J Seberry, Complex Orthogonal Space-Time Processing in Wireless Communications (Springer, New York, 2006)

14. LC Tran, A Mertins, Space-time-frequency code implementation in MB-OFDM UWB communications: design criteria and performance. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 8(2), 701713 (2009)

15. TH Tan, KC Lin, Performance of space-time block coded MB-OFDM UWB systems (Paper presented at the Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference, IEEE, Moncton, 2006), pp. 323327

16. Q Yang, KS Kwak, Outage performance of STBC MB-OFDM UWB. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 63(8), 685688 (2008)

17. LC Tran, A Mertins, E Dutkiewicz, X Huang, Unitary differential space-time-frequency codes for MB-OFDM UWB (Paper presented at the International Symposium on Communication and Information Technology, IEEE, Incheon, 2009), pp. 11611166

18. M Sudjai, LC Tran, F Safaei, Performance analysis of STFC MB-OFDM UWB in WBAN channels (Paper presented at the International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, IEEE, Sydney, 2012), pp. 17041709

19. J Takada, T Aoyagi, K Takizawa, N Katayama, T Kobayashi, KY Yazdandoost, HB Li, R Kohno, Static propagation and channel models in body area. Euro-cost 2100 TD(08), 639 (2008)

20. Y Wang, IB Bonev, JO Nielsen, IZ Kovacs, GF Pedersen, Characterization of the indoor multiantenna body-to-body radio channel. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57(4), 972979 (2009). doi:10.1109/TAP.2009.2014580

21. QH Abbasi, MM Khan, A Alomainy, Y Hao, Characterization and modelling of ultra wideband radio links for optimum performance of body area network in health care applications (Paper presented at the International Workshop on Antenna Technology, IEEE, Hong Kong, 2011), pp. 206209

22. QH Abbasi, A Sani, A Alomainy, Y Hao, Experimental characterization and statistical analysis of the pseudo-dynamic ultra wideband on-body radio channel. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett 10, 748751 (2011)

23. QH Abbasi, MM Khan, A Alomainy, Y Hao, Radio channel characterization and OFDM-based ultra wideband system modelling for body-centric wireless networks (Paper presented at the International Conference on Body Sensor Networks, IEEE, Dallas, 2011), pp. 8994

24. MM Khan, QH Abbasi, A Alomainy, Y Hao, Investigation of body shape variations effect on the ultra-wideband on-body radio propagation channel (Paper presented at the International Conference on Electromagnetic in Advance Applications, IEEE, Torino, 2011), pp. 11281131

25. J Foerster, Channel modeling sub-committee report final. IEEE 802.15 Working Group document, IEEE P802.15-02/490r1-SG3a, Oct 2005

26. S Morosi, T Bianchi, F Gei, Frequency domain multiuser receivers for an IEEE 802.15.4a short range communication network. Trans. Emerg. Telecom. Tech 24(6), 545551 (2013). doi:10.1002/ett.2597

27. A Czylwik, Adaptive OFDM for wideband radio channel, vol. 1(Paper presented at the Global Telecommunication Conference, IEEE, London, 1996), pp. 713718

28. T Keller, L Hanzo, Adaptive modulation techniques for duplex OFDM transmission. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Tech. 49(5), 18931906 (2000)

29. T Keller, L Hanzo, Adaptive multicarrier modulation: a convenient superframework for time-frequency processing in wireless communication. Proc. IEEE 88(5), 611640 (2000)

30. ST Chung, AJ Goldsmith, Degrees of freedom in adaptive modulation: a unified view. IEEE Trans. Commun. 49(9), 15611571 (2001)

Sudjai et al. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking (2015) 2015:36 Page 11 of 11

31. J Garzas, CB Calzon, AG Armada, An energy-efficient adaptive modulation suitable for wireless sensor networks with SER and throughput constraints. EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw. 2007, 17 (2007)

32. M Sudjai, LC Tran, F Safaei, A simple adaptive STFC MB-OFDM UWB system for WBAN applications (Paper presented at the International Symposium on Communication and Information Technology, IEEE, Surat Thani, 2013),pp. 6065

33. CPO Treutler, Magnetic sensors for automotive applications. Elsevier J. Sens. Actuator A Phys 91(12), 26 (2001). doi:10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00621-5

Submit your manuscript to a journal and benet from:

7 Convenient online submission7 Rigorous peer review7 Immediate publication on acceptance7 Open access: articles freely available online 7 High visibility within the eld7 Retaining the copyright to your article

Submit your next manuscript at 7 springeropen.com