The White Collar Complex Is Involved in Sexual Development of Fusarium graminearum

Abstract

Sexual spores (ascospores) of Fusarium graminearum, a homothallic ascomycetous fungus, are believed to be the primary inocula for epidemics of the diseases caused by this species in cereal crops. Based on the light requirement for the formation of fruiting bodies (perithecia) of F. graminearum under laboratory conditions, we explored whether photoreceptors play an important role in sexual development. Here, we evaluated the roles of three genes encoding putative photoreceptors [a phytochrome gene (FgFph) and two white collar genes (FgWc-1 and FgWc-2)] during sexual development in F. graminearum. For functional analyses, we generated transgenic strains lacking one or two genes from the self-fertile Z3643 strain. Unlike the wild-type (WT) and add-back strains, the single deletion strains (ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2) produced fertile perithecia under constant light on complete medium (CM, an unfavorable medium for sexual development) as well as on carrot agar (a perithecial induction condition). The expression of mating-type (MAT) genes increased significantly in the gene deletion strains compared to the WT under both conditions. Deletion of FgFph had no significant effect on sexual development or MAT gene expression. In contrast, all of the deletion strains examined did not show significant changes in other traits such as hyphal growth, mycotoxin production, and virulence. A split luciferase assay confirmed the in vivo protein-protein interactions among three photoreceptors along with FgLaeA, a global regulator of secondary metabolism and fungal development. Introduction of an intact copy of the A. nidulans LreA and LreB genes, which are homologs of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2, into the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 strains, respectively, failed to repress perithecia formation on CM in the gene deletion strains. Taken together, these results demonstrate that FgWc-1 and FgWc-2, two central components of the blue-light sensing system, negatively regulate sexual development in F. graminearum, which differs from the regulation pattern in A. nidulans.

About the Authors:

Hun Kim

Contributed equally to this work with: Hun Kim, Hee-Kyoung Kim

Affiliation: Research Center for Biobased Chemistry, Division of Convergence Chemistry, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Hee-Kyoung Kim

Contributed equally to this work with: Hun Kim, Hee-Kyoung Kim

Affiliation: Department of Medical Biotechnology, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea

Seunghoon Lee

Affiliation: Department of Medical Biotechnology, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea

Sung-Hwan Yun

* E-mail: [email protected] (SHY)

Affiliation: Department of Medical Biotechnology, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea

Introduction

Fusarium graminearum is an economically important plant pathogen that causes diseases on major cereal crops such as maize, wheat, and barley [1]. Ascospores (sexual spores) produced by this fungus during the winter within a fruiting body (perithecium) on plant debris are discharged into the air under suitable temperature and moisture conditions, which serves as primary inocula for epidemics of the fungal diseases [2, 3]. Thus, the ability of F. graminearum to produce peritheicia and ascospores is essential for the recurrent cycle of plant diseases [4]. Despite the importance of sexual development in F. graminearum, limited information is available regarding the regulation of peritheicia and ascospore formation by environmental cues, although many genes related to various biological and biochemical functions are known to be important for sexual development [5–9].

Sexual development induced under laboratory conditions is highly dependent on media composition, temperature, and light [1]. In particular, light conditions (a combination of cool-white or near-UV lights typically under 12 h-light / 12 h-dark cycles) are required for perithecium formation in F. graminearum [10]. Ascospore release is also stimulated by light in this fungus [4]. Despite the preference for white/UV light, significant perithecia production was still observed in the absence of near UV and blue wavelengths with a red cellophane filter, although F. graminearum cannot form perithecia in the darkness [4, 11]. In contrast to F. graminearum, the darkness is favorable for sexual development of Aspergillus nidulans; blue/visible light inhibited the sexual cycle compared to cultures grown in darkness, although the cultures grown under white light still produced cleistothecia [12]. Together, these observations suggest that fungi including F. graminearum and A. nidulans have evolved intricate molecular mechanisms to detect and respond to light; these mechanisms vary among fungal species [9, 11].

Light is one of the most important environmental factors that regulate numerous biological processes in various organisms such as plants, algae, and bacteria. In fungi, light-responsible processes have also been observed, including circadian rhythm, morphogenesis, reproduction, secondary metabolism, and phototropism [12–17]. With the availability of several fungal genome databases, many photoreceptors have been identified and characterized in fungi, including white collar, vivid, phytochrome, opsin, rhodopsin, and cryptochrome [14, 15, 18]. Of these photoreceptors, homologs of the white collar (Wc) complex, two central components (Wc-1 and Wc-2) of the blue-light sensing system that was initially identified and characterized in Neurospora crassa, have been investigated extensively in fungal species [19, 20]. In particular, Wc-1 homologs in F. fujikuroi and F. oxysporum as well as F. graminearum strain Z3639 have been identified, and the light regulatory mechanisms in these fungal species were investigated [11, 21, 22]. Disrupted mutants of the Wc-1 homolog in Fusarium spp. showed pleiotropic phenotypes in secondary metabolism and asexual development. However, the roles of the photoreceptors in sexual development have not been intensively evaluated in Fusarium spp.

The purpose of this study was to explore whether photoreceptors play an important role in sexual development in F. graminearum based on the fact that light was required for sexual development of this fungus. Using transgenic strains lacking each of the two white-collar genes (FgWc-1 and FgWc-2) and a phytochrome gene (FgFph), we determined the roles of these photoreceptors in the production of perithecia in F. graminearum. Additionally, we examined the photoreactivation, in vivo protein-protein interactions among photoreceptors, and heterologous expression of A. nidulans Wc homologs, LreA and LreB. Taken together, our results provide novel insight into the light-induced regulation of sexual development in the phytopathogenic fungus F. graminearum.

Materials and Methods

Fungal strains and culture conditions

F. graminearum strain Z3643, provided by Dr. Robert L. Bowden (USDA-ARS Plant Science and Entomology Research Unit, Manhattan, KS, USA), was used as the wild-type (WT) strain in this study since its ability to produce fertile perithecia is higher than the other WT strains (e.g., Z3639 and PH-1). The F. graminearum FLTRI6 strain was generated from Z3643 as a luminescent reporter of trichothecene production [9]. The mutant strains derived from Z3643 are listed in Table 1. Complete medium was used for phenotypic observation of fungal growth and pigmentation [1]. Carrot agar and complete agar media were used for sexual development of F. graminearum strains. Conidia induced in carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) medium were inoculated onto complete agar medium for photoreactivation [23]. All strains used in this study were maintained on complete agar media according to The Fusarium Laboratory Manual [1], and were stored in 20% glycerol at −80°C.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. F. graminearum strains used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.t001

Nucleic acid manipulations

To isolate genomic DNA, fungal strains grown in complete broth media for 4 days at 25°C were harvested and lyophilized, as described previously [1]. To measure the expression level of transcripts, total RNA was extracted using the Easy-Spin Total RNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea), and first-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). All PCR primers used in this study were obtained from Bioneer (Chungwon, Korea), which was described in S1 Table. The primers were diluted to 100 μM in sterilized water and stored at −20°C. The sequences used in this study were obtained from the MIPS Fusarium graminearum Genome Database (http://mips.gsf.de/genre/proj/FGDB/) and the Aspergillus Genome Database (AspGD, http://www.aspergillusgenome.org).

Targeted gene deletion, complementation, and fungal transformation

DNA constructs for deletion of FgWc-1 (FGSG_07941), FgWc-2 (FGSG_00710), and FgFph (FGSG_08608) from the F. graminearum WT strain Z3643 were created using a double-joint (DJ) PCR procedure, as described previously [24]. To delete FgWc-1, the 5′- and 3′-flanking regions of FgWc-1 ORF were amplified using the primer pairs Fgwc1–5F/Fgwc1–5R and Fgwc1–3F/Fgwc1–3R, respectively, and were fused to a geneticin resistance gene cassette (gen) amplified from pII99 using the primers Gen-F and Gen-R [25]. The resulting PCR products were used as template for the final PCR to generate the gene deletion, using the primers Fgwc1–5N and Fgwc1–3N. For deletion of FgWc-2 and FgFph, DNA constructs were created using the strategy described above. Protoplasts, transformation, and regeneration of transformants were prepared as described previously [26]. Additionally, for double deletion of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2, we generated a knock-out construct through which the 5′- and 3′-flanking regions of FgWc-2 ORF were fused to the hygromycin resistance gene cassette (hyg) amplified from pBCATPH, as described previously [24, 27]. The resulting constructs were transformed into the deletion strain FgWc-1. For the complementation of each deletion mutant, intact copies of each gene were amplified from F. graminearum WT Z3643 using the primers Fgwc1–5N/Fgwc1–3N, Fgwc2–5N/Fgwc2–3N, and FgFphA-5N/FgFphA-3N, respectively, which were co-transformed with pBCATPH, including the hyg gene.

To generate a F. graminearum strain expressing LreA of the A. nidulans WT strain A4 (provided by Dr. Suhn-Kee Chae, Paichai University, Korea), the LreA coding region, which was amplified from cDNA of the A4 strain using the primers AnLreA-F and AnLreA-R, was fused to the 5′- and 3′-flanking regions of FgWc-1 ORF and amplified using the primers Fgwc1–5F/Fgwc1-rev5 5R and Fgwc1-for3/Fgwc1–3R, respectively. The resulting PCR products were co-transformed into the protoplast of the FgWc-1–deleted strain with pBCATPH. To create a F. graminearum strain expressing LreB, we used the same strategy described above.

Protein-protein interactions using the split luciferase assay

For protein-protein interactions using split luciferase complementation, the coding regions of each gene, which were amplified from cDNA of the Z3643 strain, were cloned into the SalI site of the DNA plasmid pFNLuc and pFCLuc using the In-FusionH HD Cloning Kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA), as described previously [28]. To explore interactions between FgWc-1 and FgWc-2, the coding regions of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 were introduced into pFNLuc and pFCLuc, respectively. pFNLuc includes an N-terminal fragment of FLuc and gen, and pFCLuc carries a C-terminal fragment of FLuc and hyg. The DNA plasmids pFNLuc (including FgWc-1) and pFCLuc (including FgWc-2) were added to protoplasts of the WT Z3643 strain, and the transformants were selected based on resistance to both antibiotics (hygromycin and geneticin). Luciferase activity was measured in the cell lysates of the transformants grown in complete liquid medium for 3 days, as described previously [28]. As a positive control, we included the transgenic F. graminearum GZFNCS-1 strain showing high luciferase activity driven by in vivo protein interactions between Fbp1 (FGSG_02095) and Skp1 (FGSG_06922) fused to NLuc and CLuc, respectively [28]. The Z3643 strain carrying no plasmid was used as a negative control, showing the similar level of luminescent activity to transgenic wild-type strains carrying empty vectors expressing only nLuc (pFNLuc) and/or cLuc (pFCLuc) [28].

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis

qPCR was performed using SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Each reaction contained 10 μl of SYBR green Supermix, 500 nM of forward and reverse primers, cDNA template, and nuclease-free water to a final volume of 20 μl. PCR cycling conditions were 40 cycles of 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, and 15 sec at 95°C, followed by a final cycle of 1 min at 60°C. Experiments were repeated twice with three replicates. Expression levels were calculated using the comparative Ct method (Applied Biosystems). The EF1A gene (FGSG_08811) was used as an endogenous control for normalization.

Self-fertility assay

Aerial mycelia of cultures grown on either carrot or complete agar medium for 5 days were removed with 700 μl of 2.5% Tween 60 solution; perithecium formation was then induced. The plates were incubated for 7 days under constant light. Perithecia were dissected on glass slides in a drop of 20% glycerol, and asci were flattened under a coverslip. Asci rosettes and ascospores were observed using an image analysis system consisting of a microscope (Leica DM 2000, Wetzlar, Germany) with an attached digital camera (Leica DFC 550).

Photoreactivation

One microliter of conidial suspension (10⁵ conidia/ml) from cultures grown in CMC liquid media was point-inoculated onto complete agar medium. The plates were exposed to UV light (30 W in m²; Sankyo Denki, Kanagawa, Japan) for 6 min and then allowed to recover in darkness or under constant white light provided by conventional 40-W fluorescent bulbs (Wooree Lighting, Ansan, Korea) for 3 days. Photoreactivation was determined by comparing survival of cultures grown in light versus dark after UV exposure.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was performed twice with three replicates, and Tukey’s test was performed to examine the significant differences (P < 0.05) among the mean values of the samples.

Results

Photoreceptor FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph of Fusarium graminearum

For functional analyses, we characterized the putative photoreceptors FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph of F. graminearum chosen based on their homology to known functional photoreceptors in other species. BLAST analysis of the F. graminearum genome to the N. crassa White collar-1(Wc-1) revealed an ortholog (FGSG_07941), the amino acid sequence of which is 1,035 residues and shows 69% identity to N. crassa Wc-1. FgWc-1 is predicted to contain a polyglutamine (poly-Q) region at the N terminus, a light, oxygen, voltage (LOV) domain, a per-ARNT-sim (PAS)-Fold domain, a PAS domain, and a zinc-finger (ZnF) DNA-binding domain (S1A Fig.). FgWc-2 (FGSG_00710) encodes a 483-amino-acid (aa) protein annotated as a zinc-finger protein (White collar-2), and contains a PAS domain and a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain (S1B Fig.). FgFph (FGSG_08608) is also predicted to encode a 1,538-aa protein annotated as a phytochrome. This protein contains all predicted features of a functional phytochrome such as the N-terminal sensory region GAF (cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases) and the C-terminal output domains, composed of the histidine kinase, ATPase, and response regulatory domains for signal transmission (S1C Fig.). Based on sequence homology, comparative analysis with photoreceptor homologs in other fungi showed that FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph were highly conserved within species of the subphylum Pezizomycotina of the Ascomycota than in the phyla Oomycota, Basidiomycota, and the subphylum Saccharomycotina (S1 Fig.). qPCR analysis revealed that these three genes were constitutively expressed under both light and dark conditions, indicating that they did not show stage-specific expression. Furthermore, the effect of deletion of one gene on the expression of the other was not so dramatic except for continuous down-regulations of FgWc-1 in the FgWc-2-deletion strain (S2 Fig.).

Targeted deletion and complementation of FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph in F. graminearum

To functionally characterize the role of the photoreceptors in F. graminearum, FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph were deleted from the genomes of the Z3643 or FLTRI6 strain via double-crossover approaches, in which the predicted coding region of each gene was replaced with a geneticin resistance cassette (S3 Fig.). Each deletion mutant was complemented by introducing the WT allele with pBCATPH carrying the hyg gene. Additionally, we generated a FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 double-deletion strain (designated ΔFgWc-1/2), in which FgWc-2 of strain ΔFgWc-1 was replaced with the hyg cassette. All strains created in this study were confirmed by PCR (S3 Fig.). For phenotypic analyses, strains deleted in each gene were selected and named ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgFph. Compared with the WT strain, deletion and complementation strains were phenotypically indistinguishable in terms of radial growth, hyphal morphology, and pigmentation regardless of the presence of light when cultured on a variety of growth media (data not shown). In addition, these deletion strains showed no significant changes in trichothecene production, response to various stresses (S4A and S5 Figs), or virulence towards host plants (data not shown). However, ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 showed more aerial mycelia when grown under constant light (Fig. 1), and ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-1/2 exhibited reduced conidiation on complete medium compared to WT (with ∼3.2- and ∼5.4-fold-changes, respectively) (S4B Fig.). Based on these observations, FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph did not severely affect in hypahl growth, secondary metabolism, stress response, or virulence compared to WT, unlike the photoreceptors previously characterized in other fungal species.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Mycelial growth of F. graminearum strains on complete medium.

Cultures were grown in constant light (upper panel) and darkness (lower panel) for 6 days. Photographs were taken on the tops of the plates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.g001

Impairment of photoreactivation by deletion of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2

Photoreactivation is a light-dependent process in which photolyases utilize light energy to repair UV-induced DNA damage [29]. To investigate whether photoreactivation requires the photoreceptors FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph, we evaluated the survival of F. graminearum strains on complete agar medium, which allowed recovery under constant light or darkness after UV exposure. WT Z3643 grew robustly on complete agar medium under constant light after UV exposure (Fig. 2); however, it was unable to grow in darkness (data not shown), suggesting that photoreactivation occurs in F. graminearum. In contrast, the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 strains did not survive under both constant light and dark after UV exposure (Fig. 2). The complemented strains Wc-1c and Wc-2c showed restored growth under constant light, similar to the WT, indicating that FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 are required for photoreactivation (Fig. 2). However, unlike ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2, the ΔFgFph strain exhibited robust growth during 3 days of recovery under constant light, indicating that deletion of FgFph had no effect on photoreactivation (Fig. 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Photoreactivation of F. graminearum strains.

Spore suspension (10⁶/ml) of each strain was point-inoculated onto complete agar medium, and exposed to UV light for 6 min. After incubation for 3 days with constant light, the colony diameter was measured from all strains. The experiments were performed with three biological replications.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.g002

Deletion of FgWc-1 or FgWc-2 affects sexual development

To explore the effect of deletion of photoreceptor genes on self-fertility in F. graminearum, fungal cultures were grown on carrot agar under constant white light to induce sexual development. All strains including ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgFph produced abundant mature perithecia on carrot agar after perithecial induction (Fig. 3A). When measuring the expression of mating type genes (MAT1-1-1 and MAT1-2-1), master regulators of sexual development, and PKS3 (required for perithecium pigmentation) by qPCR, we found that the MAT transcript accumulations in the ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgWc-1/2 strains were two- to three-fold higher than those in the WT strain; no significant change in expression of PKS3 was detected (Fig. 3B). We also explored the effect of gene deletions on sexual development on complete agar plates, a culture condition unfavorable for perithecia formation in F. graminearum. The ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgWc-1/2 strains produced abundant amounts of fertile perithecia carrying ascospores on complete agar media 7 days after perithecial induction, whereas the WT, Wc-1c, Wc-2c, and ΔFgFph strains produced no perithecia at all (Fig. 3C), suggesting that FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 played a negative role in the regulation of sexual development in F. graminearum. qPCR analysis confirmed upregulation of MAT genes on complete medium, as shown on carrot agar (Fig. 3D). However, deletion of FgFph caused no obvious developmental and physical phenotypes, consistent with the observations in N. crassa and Cryptococcus neoformans [30,31].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Perithecium formation and gene expression associated with sexual development.

(A) Strains grown on carrot agar media were self-fertilized. Photographs were taken 7 days after sexual induction. Z3643, WT strain; FgWc-1, FgWc-1 deletion mutant; FgWc-2, FgWc-2 deletion mutant; FgFph, FgFph deletion mutant; FgWc-1/2, FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 double deletion mutant; Wc-1c, complemented strain of FgWc-1; Wc-2c, complemented strain of FgWc-2; Fphc, complemented strain of FgFph. The size bar indicates 500 μm. (B) Relative transcript levels for MAT1-1-1, MAT1-2-1 and PKS3. Transcript levels of the genes in each strain were analyzed using qPCR. Total RNAs were extracted from the 5-day-old cultures on carrot agar after perithecial induction. (C) Perithecium formation of F. graminearum strains on complete agar medium. Photographs were taken 7 days after sexual induction. Dissecting the perithecia showed the asci and ascospores of each strain (inset boxes). (D) Relative transcript levels of MAT1-1-1 and MAT1-2-1 from 1- and 4-day-old cultures on complete agar medium after perithecial induction. DAI, day after induction of sexual development.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.g003

Complementation of the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 strains with A. nidulans LreA and LreB, respectively

In contrast to F. graminearum, constant darkness is known to be favorable for sexual development of A. nidulans. Homologs of the Wc genes (LreA and LreB) in A. nidulans are known to be involved in sexual development. These Wc proteins of A. nidulans also contain functional domains such as LOV, PAS, and ZnF DNA-binding domains, but LreA protein lacks the N-terminal poly-Q stretches found in FgWc-1 (Fig. 4A). To examine the effects of A. nidulans LreA and LreB on phenotypic recovery in the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 strains, the cDNA fragment of an intact copy of LreA and LreB was inserted into the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 genomes (Fig. 4B), respectively. The resulting strains were designated Wc-1c^LreA and Wc-2c^LreB, respectively, and confirmed by PCR. The expected PCR products were amplified from the Wc-1c^LreA (5.1- and 3.8-kb fragments) and Wc-2c^LreB (3.5- and 2.3-kb fragments) strains. A 0.2-kb PCR fragment was also amplified from the LreA or LreB coding region of the transgenic strains (Fig. 4B). Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR revealed that both LreA and LreB were expressed in the Wc-1c^LreA and Wc-2c^LreB strains as much as were FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 in the WT strain (data not shown). Both Wc-1c^LreA and Wc-2c^LreB strains showed phenotypes similar to the WT strain. However, these strains produced fertile perithecia at levels similar to the recipient strains ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 on complete agar medium. In contrast, the Wc-1c and Wc-2c strains, which carried the native FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 copies, respectively, did not produce perithecia, as described above (Fig. 4C).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. Integration of A. nidulans LreA and LreB into F. graminearum strains.

(A) Comparison of Wc-1 and Wc-2 homologs between A. nidulans and F. graminearum. P-Q, a poly-glutamine region; LOV, a light, oxygen, voltage domain; PAS, a per-ARNT-sim Fold domain; PAC, a subset of PAS fold domain; ZnF, a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain. These domains were predicted using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). (B) Integration of LreA and LreB into ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2, respectively. Left panel shows a schematic representation of the homologous gene recombination strategy used to generate strain Wc-1c^LreA and Wc-2c^LreB. The right panel shows the PCR results, where cDNA of LreA (upper) and LreB (lower) was inserted into the deleted position of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 in F. graminearum, respectively. (C) Perithecium formation of F. graminearum strains on complete agar medium. Photographs were taken 7 days after sexual induction. Z3643, WT strain; Wc-1c, complemented strain of FgWc-1; Wc-2c, complemented strain of FgWc-2; Wc-1c^LreA, integrated strain of LreA into ΔFgWc-1; Wc-2c^LreB, integrated strain of LreB into ΔFgWc-2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.g004

Protein interactions among photoreceptors, FgLaeA and FgVeA

Previously, Kim et al. (2013) reported that a transgenic strain lacking FgLaeA, a component of the FgVeA protein complex, exhibited early onset of both MAT gene expression and perithecia formation compared to the wild-type strain of F. graminearum [11]. Our observation that perithecia formation of the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 strains was de-repressed on complete medium suggested that FgWc-1 and/or FgWc-2 were interconnected with FgLaeA (e.g., protein interactions) to control sexual development in F. graminearum, as shown in A. nidulans [12]. To explore in vivo interactions among these proteins, we employed the split luciferase complementation assay, a sensitive and efficient method of monitoring protein-protein interactions in filamentous ascomycetes [28]. For this assay, we generated plasmid vectors carrying the entire coding region of FgLaeA fused to a DNA region encoding an N-terminal fragment of luciferase (pFNLuc-FgLaeA) and the FgWc-1 coding region fused to a C-terminal fragment (pFCLuc-Wc1), respectively. Both vectors were co-transformed into the genome of Z3643, resulting in a transgenic strain designated LW1. Other strains generated in this study for protein-protein interactions were described in Table 1. All fungal transformants co-expressing both of the fused proteins examined (for the interactions FgLaeA-FgWc-1, FgLaeA-FgWc-2, and FgLaeA-FgFph) exhibited luminescent activities under both constant light and dark conditions (Fig. 5A).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. in vivo protein-protein interactions using a split luciferase assay.

(A) Luminescent activity in fungal cell lysates. All parentheses indicate the interaction of two proteins. Strain GZFNCS-1 was used as a positive control, showing an interaction between Fbp1 and Skp1; Z3643 containing no vectors was used as a negative control. n.d., not detected. (B) A proposed model for the interaction of photoreceptors, which interacted with FgLaeA in F. graminearum WT Z3643 strain, based on the split luciferase assay. Solid and dotted lines indicate positive and negative roles of proteins, respectively, for sexual development in F. graminearum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.g005

Although FgLaeA interacts with all photoreceptors regardless of light conditions, the luciferase activity in most fungal cultures grown under constant light was higher than that of those cultured in darkness, suggesting that the protein interactions examined are stronger under light than dark conditions (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, we found that FgLaeA interacted more strongly with FgFph than Wc proteins. In addition, FgVeA, the other member of the FgVeA complex, interacted with FgFph (Fig. 5A). Of the interactions among photoreceptors, we observed that the luminescence signal from the interaction between FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 was similar to the positive control (GZFNCS-1), particularly under constant light conditions (Fig. 5A), which is consistent with Wc-1 and Wc-2 of N. crassa physically interacting to form the heterodimeric white-collar complex. In addition, we detected luminescence signals in the fungal transformants for the interaction between FgFph and FgWc-1, but not FgFph and FgWc-2, indicating that FgFph exclusively interacts with FgWc-1 of the two FgWc proteins.

Based on the luciferase intensities determined in this work and our previous study [9], we proposed an interaction model for the photoreceptors and the FgVeA complex (consisting of FgLaeA, FgVeA, and FgVelB) (Fig. 5B).

Discussion

Light is a critical component that regulates numerous biological processes in various organisms, including fungi [14]. Since most known fungal responses to light are mediated by blue light (although other wavelengths can have an effect), the molecular function of white-collar genes encoding the blue-light photoreceptor in several fungal species, such as N. crassa and Aspergillus spp., have been investigated extensively [12, 16, 31, 32]. Several fungal species share the same repertoire of photoreceptors, although functional differences have been reported [11, 16, 33, 34, 35, 36]. Furthermore, different light-responsible phenotypes have been observed by different strains within the same fungal species [37]. In this regard, it is possible that phenotypes of the ΔFgWc-1and ΔFgWc-2 strains derived from the WT Z3643 strain differed from those of the same gene-deleted mutants generated from the other WT Z3639 strain of F. graminearum. Previously, Kim et al. (2014) reported that the deletion of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 in F. graminearum strain Z3639 affected secondary metabolism and fungal development under constant white light and/or darkness [11]. The mutants showed impaired carotenoid biosynthesis and photoreactivation, whereas the production of reddish pigments, trichothecenes and conidia was de-repressed compared with the WT strain [11]. Whereas, we observed no phenotypic differences in pigmentation, or trichothecene production among the ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, ΔFgFph, and WT Z3643 strain. However, impairment of the photoreactivation mechanism in ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 was consistent with that in F. graminearum Z3639, F. oxysporum, Cercospora zeae-maydis, and Bipolaris oryzae, in which the disruption of Wc-1 homologs results in defects in photoreactivation [16, 22, 38].

Since light is required for sexual development of the homothallic fungus F. graminearum, we explored whether photoreceptors regulate sexual development. Note that the effect of FgWc-1 and FgWc-2 deletion on sexual development in F. graminearum strain Z3639 was unclear [11]. The Z3639 deletion strains showed delayed perithecial maturity compared to the WT on carrot agar, but maturity reached the WT level at 10 days after sexual induction [1, 11]. Here, we characterized the genes encoding white collar and phytochrome photoreceptors of F. graminearum WT Z3643 strain, and further investigated self-fertility through gene deletions. We found that deletions of FgWc-1 or FgWc-2 induced the formation of mature perithecia, even under conditions unfavorable for sexual development. Comparison of sexual development by white collar deletion strains derived from WT Z3643 and Z3639 strains in this study showed that the mutants from Z3643 exhibit more de-repression of perithecium formation than that of the mutants from Z3639 (S6 Fig.). Reduced conidiation in ΔFgWc-2 and ΔFgWc-1/2 compared to WT, unlike in the case of the same gene deletion strains of Z3639 [11], also supports the de-repression of perithecium formation in these deletion strains since the repression of asexual development is required for perithecial induction in F. graminarum [5]. Somewhat surprisingly, the mutants derived from Z3639 exclusively exhibit de-repression of conidiation, which is consistent with the previous results (S6 Fig.) [11]. These results suggest that different strains of F. graminearum are likely to possess different development behaviors. Recently, it has been reported that the absence of FgLaeA, a global regulator of secondary metabolism and fungal development, enhanced sexual development of F. graminearum Z3643 with increased MAT transcript levels [9]. Together, these observations were suggestive of coordination(s) between white collar proteins and FgLaeA, such as protein-protein interactions. To evaluate this hypothesis, we performed in vivo protein-protein interaction assays using split luciferase complementation, and found that FgLaeA interacts with FgWc-1 and FgWc-2, as well as FgFph; however, FgFph did not play a role in sexual development in F. graminearum. Our results suggest that, in response to light signals, the photoreceptor complex (FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph) along with FgLaeA, a member of the FgVeA complex, acts a negative regulator for perithecia formation during an early stage of sexual development in F. graminearum. In contrast, the negative effect of deletion of FgVeA or FgVelB, which are also members of the FgVeA complex, on perithecia formation in F. graminearum [5] is suggestive of other regulatory pathways in which the photoreceptors (probably along with FgVeA and FgVelB) positively control sexual development through interacting with FgLaeA (and possibly with FgWc-1 and FgWc-2) (Fig. 5) as a bridge. In this regard, note that MAT genes were down-regulated in the ΔFgVelB strain [5]. Therefore, the protein-protein interactions presented in the model (Fig. 5) may not occur for a single regulatory pathway in fungal cells; instead, interactions of different combinations of proteins may be required to control sexual development in response to light and other environmental cues. It is possible that the photoreceptors both activate and repress sexual development in conjunction with different partners (e.g., members of the FgVeA complex), in which a key regulatory pathway would be chromatin remodeling in F. graminearum.

One of the differences between F. graminearum and A. nidulans is the effect of light on sexual development [9]. In A. nidulans, cleistothecial formation is slightly inhibited by light and occurs preferentially in the dark. In the dark, deletions of the LreA and LreB genes, which encode Wc proteins, caused 70% and 30% reductions in cleistothecial formation, respectively [12]. However, these mutants did not undergo sexual development under white-light conditions. This suggests that LreA and LreB act as positive regulators of the sexual cycle in A. nidulans [12]. In contrast, light is required for sexual development of F. graminearum, in which the formation of perithecia occurs only in light and is completely inhibited in darkness [11]. Furthermore, our observation of de-repression of sexual development in the ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 strains supports the opposite features of the regulation of sexual development between F. graminearum and A. nidulans. Based on the finding that LreA and LreB act as activators of sexual development in A. nidulans, we explored whether LreA was able to complement the phenotypic changes in the ΔFgWc-1 strain. We also examined changes in the phenotypes associated with sexual development in the resulting F. graminearum strains under either constant light or darkness. Considering that LreA and LreB function as activators in sexual development regardless of light and darkness conditions, we expected that the resulting strains, Wc-1c^LreA and Wc-2c^LreB, would produce perithecia on either complete or carrot agar medium in darkness. However, our results showed that Wc-1c^LreA and Wc-2c^LreB produced mature perithecia on complete medium only under constant light, but did not enter the sexual stage in darkness. The Wc-1c and Wc-2c strains, which carried a native F. graminearum gene, were restored to the WT, which did not produce perithecia on complete agar under constant light or darkness. There are two possible explanations for these observations: 1) although LreA and LreB function as activators in sexual development of A. nidulans, their activity may be repressed in the darkness through the action of other photoreceptors or regulatory proteins in signaling pathways governing the sexual development of F. graminearum [11,12,39], or 2) unlike the protein interaction model in A. nidulans where FphA physically interacts with LreB [12], our results showed that FgFph interacts with FgWc-1 in F. graminearum, suggestive of differential regulatory pathways for sexual development. Although the Wc proteins as blue-light photoreceptors are conserved in the fungal genome, functional differences likely exist among fungal species. Thus, the exact relationship between F. graminearum and A. nidulans sexual development remains unclear.

In this study, we generated white collar FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and phytochrome FgFph deletion strains derived from the F. graminearum Z3643 strain. We observed no apparent phenotypes related to hypha growth or other traits in the gene deletion deletions. However, ΔFgWc-1 and ΔFgWc-2 enhanced sexual development of F. graminearum, which produced abundant mature perithecia under conditions unfavorable for the induction of sexual stages. In addition, we investigated the in vivo protein-protein interactions among photoreceptors and FgLaeA, and performed functional comparisons between A. nidulans and F. graminearum sexual development by means of the white collar genes. Our results provide novel insights into the complex signaling pathways governing sexual development in F. graminearum.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Fig. Distribution of photoreceptor homologs in fungi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Relative transcript levels of FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph in the wild-type Z3643, ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgFph strains under dark and light conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Strategies for deletion of FgWc-1, FgWc-2, and FgFph in F. graminearum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Trichothecene production (A) and conidiation (B) of ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgFph strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s004

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Relative sensitivities of the ΔFgWc-1, ΔFgWc-2, and ΔFgFph strains to Congo red (A) and H₂O₂ (B).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s005

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Comparison of white collar deletion strains derived from F. graminearum Z3643 and Z3639 strains, respectively, in sexual development (A and B) and conidiation (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s006

(PDF)

S1 Table. Primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293.s007

(PDF)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: HK HKK SHY. Performed the experiments: HK HKK SL. Analyzed the data: HK HKK. Wrote the paper: HK HKK SHY.

Citation: Kim H, Kim H-K, Lee S, Yun S-H (2015) The White Collar Complex Is Involved in Sexual Development of Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120293

References

1. Leslie JF, Summerell BA. The Fusarium laboratory manual. Iowa: Blackwell Pub; 2006.

2. Sutton JC. Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Can J Plant Pathol. 1982;4: 195–209.

3. Guenther JC, Trail F. The development and differentiation of Gibberella zeae (anamorph: Fusarium graminearum) during colonization of wheat. Mycologia. 2005;97: 229–237. pmid:16389974

4. Trail F, Xu H, Loranger R, Gadoury D. Physiological and environmental aspects of ascospore discharge in Gibberella zeae (anamorph: Fusarium graminearum). Mycologia. 2002;94: 181–189. pmid:21156487

5. Lee J, Myong K, Kim J-E, Kim H-K, Yun S-H, Lee Y-W. FgVelB globally regulates sexual reproduction, mycotoxin production and pathogenicity in the cereal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Microbiology. 2012;158: 1723–1733. pmid:22516221

6. Hou Z, Xue C, Peng Y, Katan T, Kistler HC, Xu JR. A mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (MGV1) in Fusarium graminearum is required for female fertility, heterokaryon formation, and plant infection. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002;15: 1119–1127. pmid:12423017

7. Urban M, Mott E, Farley T, Hammond-Kosack K. The Fusarium graminearum MAP1 gene is essential for pathogenicity and development of perithecia. Mol Plant Pathol. 2003; 4: 347–359. pmid:20569395

8. Yu H-Y, Seo J-A, Kim J-E, Han K-H, Shim W-B, Yun S-H, et al. Functional analyses of heterotrimeric G protein Gα and Gβ subunits in Gibberella zeae. Microbiology. 2008;154: 392–401. pmid:18227243

9. Kim H-K, Lee S, Jo S-M, McCormick SP, Butchko RAE, Proctor RH, et al. Functional roles of FgLaeA in controlling secondary metabolism, sexual development, and virulence in Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One 2013;8: e68441. pmid:23874628

10. Tschanz AT, Horst RK, Nelson PE. The effect of environment on sexual reproduction of Gibberella zeae. Mycologia. 1976;68: 327–340

11. Kim H, Son H, Lee Y-W. Effects of light on secondary metabolism and fungal development of Fusarium graminearum. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;116: 380–389.

12. Purschwitz J, Müller S, Kastner C, Schöser M, Haas H, Espeso EA, et al. Functional and physical interaction of blue- and red-light sensors in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Biol. 2008;18: 255–259. pmid:18291652

13. Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Circadian rhythms, photobiology and functional genomics in Neurospora. In: Esser K, Brown AJP, editors. The mycota XIII, fungal genomics. Germany: Springer; 2006. pp. 53−74.

14. Corrochano LM, Avalos J. Light Sensing. In: Borkovich K, Ebbole DJ, editors. Cellular and molecular biology of filamentous fungi. Washington DC: ASM Press; 2010. pp. 417−441.

15. Avalos J, Estrada AF. Regulation by light in Fusarium. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010; 47: 930−938. pmid:20460165

16. Kim H, Ridenour JB, Dunkle LD, Bluhm BH. Regulation of stomatal tropism and infection by light in Cercospora zeae-maydis: evidence for coordinated host/pathogen responses to photoperiod? PLoS Pathog 2011;7: e1002113. pmid:21829344

17. Fuller KK, Ringelberg CS, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. The fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus regulates growth, metabolism, and stress resistance in response to light. mBio. 2013; 4: e00142−13. pmid:23532976

18. Corrochano LM. Fungal photoreceptors: sensory molecules for fungal development and behaviour. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2007; 6: 725–736. pmid:17609765

19. Ballario P, Vittorioso P, Magrelli A, Talora C, Cabibbo A, Macino G. White collar-1, a central regulator of blue light responses in Neurospora, is a zinc finger protein. EMBO J. 1996;15: 1650−1657. pmid:8612589

20. Linden H, Macino G. White collar 2, a partner in blue-light signal transduction, controlling expression of light-regulated genes in Neurospora crassa. EMBO J. 1997;16: 98−109. pmid:9009271

21. Estrada AF, Avalos J. The White Collar protein WcoA of Fusarium fujikuroi is not essential for photocarotenogenesis, but is involved in the regulation of secondary metabolism and conidiation. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008; 45: 705−718. pmid:18203635

22. Ruiz-Roldan MC, Garre V, Guarro J, Marine M, Roncero MI. Role of the white collar 1 photoreceptor in carotenogenesis, UV resistance, hydrophobicity, and virulence of Fusarium oxysporum. Eukaryot Cell. 2008;7: 1227−1230. pmid:18503005

23. Cappellini RA, Peterson JL. Macroconidium formation in submerged cultures by a non-sporulating strain of Gibberella zeae. Mycologia. 1965;57: 962–966.

24. Yu JH, Hamari Z, Han KH, Seo JA, Reyes-Dominguez Y, Scazzocchio C. Doublejoint PCR: a PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004; 41: 973–981. pmid:15465386

25. Namiki F, Matsunaga M, Okuda M, Inoue I, Nishi K, Fujita Y, et al. Mutation of an arginine biosynthesis gene causes reduced pathogenicity in Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2001; 14: 580–584. pmid:11310747

26. Lee T, Han Y-K, Kim K-H, Yun S-H, Lee Y-W. Tri13 and Tri7 determine deoxynivalenol- and nivalenol-producing chemotypes of Gibberella zeae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68: 2148–2154. pmid:11976083

27. Yun S-H. Molecular genetics and manipulation of pathogenicity and mating determinants in Mycosphaerella zeae-maydis and Cochliobolus heterostrophus. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University. 1998.

28. Kim HK, Cho EJ, Jo S, Sung BR, Lee S, Yun SH. A split luciferase complementation assay for studying in vivo protein-protein interactions in filamentous ascomycetes. Curr Genet. 2012;58: 179–189. pmid:22531843

29. Thoma F. Light and dark in chromatin repair: repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair. EMBO J. 1999;18: 6585−6598. pmid:10581233

30. Froehlich AC, Noh B, Vierstra RD, Loros J, Dunlap JC. Genetic and molecular analysis of phytochromes from the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4: 2140−52. pmid:16339731

31. Idnurm A, Heitman J. Light controls growth and development via a conserved pathway in the fungal kingdom. PLoS Biol. 2005;3: e95. pmid:15760278

32. Linden H. Ballario P, Macino G. Blue light regulation in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol. 1997;22: 141−150. pmid:9454641

33. Ambra R, Grimaldi B, Zamboni S, Filetici P, Macino G, Ballario P. Photomorphogenesis in the hypogeous fungus Tuber borchii: isolation and characterization of Tbwc-1, the homologue of the blue-light photoreceptor of Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41: 688−697. pmid:15275664

34. Casas-Flores S, Rios-Momberg M, Bibbins M, Ponce-Noyola P, Herrera-Estrella A. BLR-1 and BLR-2, key regulatory elements of photoconidiation and mycelial growth in Trichoderma atroviride. Microbiology. 2004;150: 3561−3569. pmid:15528646

35. Cheng P, He Q, Yang Y, Wang L, Liu Y. Functional conservation of light, oxygen, or voltage domains in light sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100: 5938−5943. pmid:12719523

36. Kim S, Singh P, Park J, Park S, Friedman A, Zheng T, et al. Genetic and molecular characterization of a blue light photoreceptor MGWC-1 in Magnaporth oryzae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2011;48: 400−407. pmid:21241815

37. Yang T, Dong C. Photo morphogenesis and photo response of the blue-light receptor gene Cmwc-1 in different strains of Cordyceps militaris. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014.352:190−197. pmid:24484244

38. Kihara J, Moriwaki A, Tanaka N, Ueno M, Arase S. Characterization of the BLR1 gene encoding a putative blue-light regulator in the phytopathogenic fungus Bipolaris oryzae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007;266: 110−118. pmid:17233721

39. Kim H, Ridenour JB, Dunkle LD, Bluhm BH. Regulation of pathogenesis by light in Cercospora zeae-maydis: an updated perspective. Plant Pathol J. 2011;27: 103−109.

40. O’Donnell K, Kistler HC, Tacke BK, Casper HH. Gene genealogies reveal global phylogeographic structure and reproductive isolation among lineages of Fusarium graminearum, the fungus causing wheat scab. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97: 7905–7910. pmid:10869425