About the Authors:
Min-Yuan Chia
Contributed equally to this work with: Min-Yuan Chia, Alan Yung-Chih Hu
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Alan Yung-Chih Hu
Contributed equally to this work with: Min-Yuan Chia, Alan Yung-Chih Hu
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Yu-Fen Tseng
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Tsai-Chuan Weng
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Chia-Chun Lai
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Jun-Yang Lin
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Po-Ling Chen
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Ya-Fang Wang
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Sin-Ru Chao
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Jui-Yuan Chang
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Yi-Shiuh Hwang
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Chia-Tsui Yeh
Affiliation: Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
Cheng-Ping Yu
Affiliation: Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
Yee-Chun Chen
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Ih-Jen Su
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Min-Shi Lee
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
Introduction
Avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) viruses emerged as human pathogens in China in early 2013 and 450 laboratory-confirmed human cases, including 165 deaths, have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) by 27 June 2014, including 10, 4 and 1 imported cases detected in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Malaysia, respectively [1]. The cases occurred in an initial wave from February to May 2013 (n = 133), and a second wave of epidemics has reemerged from June 2013 to June 2014 (n = 317) [1]. Laboratory analysis of influenza H7N9 viruses isolated from human, animal and environmental samples during the first and second waves indicates that the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes of the viruses remain similar, and all viruses are antigenically close to A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) virus which was recommended for vaccine development by the WHO. Since much remain unknown about this virus, such as 1) the animal reservoirs in which it is circulating, 2) the main exposures and routes of human transmission, and 3) prevalence of this virus in human and animal populations in endemic areas, it is important to continue strengthening surveillance and national pandemic preparedness including stockpile of antivirals and vaccine development, especially for Asian countries close to China [2–7].
Current seasonal influenza vaccines are mainly manufactured using egg-based technology. However, the egg-based technology could not meet the surging global demand during an influenza pandemic as proved in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic [8]. Therefore, it is desirable to establish cell-based influenza vaccine production platform for pandemic preparedness [9]. Since A/Anhui/1/2013(H7N9)-like viruses were recommended for vaccine development in April 2013, several egg-derived high growth reassortant vaccine viruses have been generated by the WHO reference laboratories. However, the WHO reference laboratories have not generated cell-derived high growth vaccine viruses, which is the critical step to initiate production of cell-based influenza vaccines. In this study, we adapted the egg-derived influenza H7N9 vaccine viruses in mammalian cells to generate cell-derived vaccine viruses, manufactured influenza whole virus vaccines in a microcarrier cell culture system, and evaluate immunogenicity and protection of the vaccine candidates in ferrets. Based on clinical studies of the influenza H5N1 and H7N1 vaccines, whole virus vaccine antigens are more immunogenic in naive populations than split and subunit vaccine antigens [10, 11].
Materials and Methods
Virus, cells, and medium
An egg-derived influenza H7N9 reassortant vaccine virus (NIBRG-268) was generated using reverse genetics by the UK National Institute of Biological Standard and Control (NIBSC) and supplied to National Health Research Institutes (NHRI), Taiwan. The NIBRG-268 virus contains six internal genes of the egg-adapted high-growth A/PR8 virus and two surface protein genes (HA and NA) of A/Anhui/1/2013(H7N9). At NHRI, the NIBRG-268 virus could not grow well initially in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells (∼105 TCID50/ml). Therefore, we serially passed the NIBRG-268 virus in MDCK cells to increase its growth efficiency. MDCK cells (ATCC CCL-34) were purchased from the Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan. MDCK cells were grown using DMEM (GibcoBRL) plus 5% fetal bovine serum (Moregate) to generate master and working cell banks following cGMP guidelines and have been characterized to fulfill the requirements for continuous cell lines used for manufacture of biological products [12–14]. For vaccine production, serum-free medium (OptiPro, Life Technologies) was used for cell growth and OptiPro supplemented with 2 μg/ml of TPCK-trypsin (Sigma) was used for virus replication.
Virus titration
HA titrations were conducted in 96-well microplates using turkey red blood cells (RBC) following the standard technique [15]. Virus infectious titers were measured using the 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) assay based on cytopathic effect and plaque assay based on plaque forming unit (PFU) in MDCK cells [15]. A positive control with pre-specified acceptable range was included for conducting HA, TCID50, and plaque assays.
Production of vaccine antigens in microcarrier-based cell cultures
In general, the regulatory hurdle of inactivated influenza vaccines is lower than that of live-attenuated influenza vaccines. In addition, historical data have shown that inactivated whole virus antigens have been more immunogenic in naïve populations than split and subunit vaccine antigens [10, 11, 16–21]. Therefore, we decided to develop inactivated whole virus as vaccine candidates. Cytodex 1 microcarriers (GE Healthcare) were hydrated, autoclaved, and preconditioned according to the manufacturer’s instructions [12, 13]. When the cells were grown confluent on microcarriers, microcarriers were sampled to count cell density and the vaccine viruses were added to infect cells. Supernatants of virus growth were clarified and inactivated with formaldehyde. Virus inactivation was confirmed with TCID50 and plaque assays. After inactivation and concentration, downstream purification processes comprising of size-exclusion chromatography (Capto Q, GE Healthcare), anion-exchange chromatography (Capto Core, GE Healthcare), and membrane filtration (Hydrosate, GE Healthcare) were used. The HA protein concentrations of purified inactivated vaccine antigens were measured using the standard single radial diffusion (SRD) assay with the standard antigen and antiserum obtained from the US FDA [22].
Electron microscopy analysis
Viral particles were deposited on a carbon-coated 200 mesh copper grid for 1 min at room temperature and then the copper grid was stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid solution for 1 min. The stained grid was dried for 1 day at room temperature and observed under a JEM 1200EX transmission electron microscopy [23].
Vaccine efficacy in ferrets
Four- to six-month-old female ferrets were obtained through a laboratory breeding program at Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center and confirmed to be H7N9 seronegative by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Prior to the animal study, microchip capable of measuring the temperature was implanted beneath the skin between the shoulder blades. Ferrets were numbered and housed separately in animal biosafety level 3 (ABSL3) laboratory with individual temperature control at 22–24°C and 55–60% relative humidity throughout the experiment.
Ferrets were immunized intramuscularly with 2 doses of vaccine antigen at a 2-week interval. Three treatment groups (4 ferrets per group) with vaccines containing different HA and adjuvant dosages were compared, including 1) 300μg Al(OH)3, 2) 1.5μg HA, and 3) 1.5μg HA+300μg Al(OH)3. Solicited local symptoms at injection site were evaluated during the 7 days postvaccination period after each dose of H7N9 vaccine. Sera were collected at days 0 (prevaccination), 14 (post dose 1), and 21 (1 week post dose 2) for measuring HI and neutralizing antibody titers. At Day 28, ferrets were intranasally inoculated with wild-type influenza A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) viruses (107 TCID50/0.5 ml). Clinical signs of body weight and temperature were monitored daily for 7 days post challenge (DPC). At Day 31 (3 DPC) and 35 (7 DPC), two ferrets were sacrificed respectively to collect multiple organs (nasal turbinate, upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, lung, and hilar lymph node) for measuring viral RNA copies by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Live infectious virus titers were further quantified for nasal turbinate and other organs with significant viral RNA copies (>3 log10 RNA copies/mg). In pilot studies, ferrets infected with wild-type influenza A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) viruses did not develop clinical symptoms and only shed viruses in respiratory tract within 7 days post inoculation. Therefore, ferrets were only followed up for 7 days post inoculation in the vaccine protection study.
Real-time RT-PCR
One hundred milligram of tissue sample was homogenized mechanically in DMEM to make a 10% suspension. After vigorous shaking, the samples were centrifuged at 8000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The viral RNA was extracted from supernatants by QIAamp Viral RNA Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Each RNA sample was then reversely transcribed using the Random primer (Bioline) and the HiScript I Reverse Transcripase (Bionovas) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Copy numbers of influenza Matrix (M) gene were determined by a 7500 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) as described previously [6, 24]. Positive and negative reference samples were tested along with the unknown samples and each sample was tested in duplicate.
Pathological examination and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining
All ferrets were sacrificed at designated time points to collect multi organs for viral titer determination and pathological examination. Ferrets were anesthetized by injection with 7.5 mg/kg Zoletil 50 (Virbac) and inhalation with Isoflurane (Panion & Bf Biotech) and euthanized by taking total amount of blood from heart. Tissue specimens form nasal turbinate, upper respiratory tract, lower respiratory tract, lung, and hilar lymph node were collected for further analysis. Excised tissues of ferret organs were stored at −70°C until titration or fixed with 10% phosphate-buffered formalin at room temperature for pathological examination. Tissues were trimmed, dehydrated, embedded, and cut into 5μm-thick sections in procession. One section from each tissue was stained by a standard histochemistry staining procedure with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma), whereas another one was deparaffinized with xyline and rehydrated through a series graded alcohol solutions for standard IHC staining with a mouse anti-nucleoprotein (NP) monoclonal antibody (provided by Animal Technology Institute Taiwan). Detection was performed by UltraVision Quanto detection system HRP DAB (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sections were counterstained in Mayer’s hematoxylin (ScyTeK Laboratories) and mounted by Surgipath micromount medium (Leica Biosystems).
Serological assays
Serum HI antibody titers were measured using turkey red blood cells and 4 HA unit of vaccine virus antigen following WHO’s standard procedures [15]. Serum neutralizing antibody titers were determined using MDCK cells and are expressed as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum that gave 50% neutralization of 100 TCID50 of the vaccine virus following the WHO standard procedures [15]. Starting dilutions are 1:10 in the HI assay and 1:40 in the neutralization assay, so undetectable antibody titers were assigned to 5 and 20, respectively. Seroconversion is defined as conversion from seronegative (antibody titers <10 in the HA assay and <40 in the Nt assay) to seropositive (antibody titers ≥20 in the HA assay and ≥80 in the Nt assay). A positive control serum with pre-specified acceptable range was included for HI and neutralization tests.
Statistical analysis
In HI and neutralization tests, antibody titers were log-transformed to calculate geometric mean titers (GMT) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Differences in HI and neutralization titers were tested for statistical significance by using the unpaired Student t test. For infection study, changes in body temperatures and weights were measured by calculating percentage compared with baseline (prevaccination) in each ferret. A significant change was defined as >5% change and their differences in different treatment groups were tested for statistical significance using the Fisher’s exact test and non-parametric method (Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test).
Ethics statement
All study procedures and animal cares were approved and conducted in accordance with the guidelines and under the supervision of Institutional Committee on Animal Care and Use, Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center (approval # AV-102-27) following the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidebook published by the US Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.
Results
Adaptation of NIBRG-268 in MDCK cells
After first passage in MDCK cells, the NIBRG-268 virus could only grow to about 105 TCID50/ml (NIBRG268-M1). After three passages in MDCK cells, the NIBRG268-M3 virus could reach 107 TCID50/ml and was then used to generate a master virus bank of 400 vials (HA titer 256, infectious virus titers: 3.16x107 TCID50/ml and 2.20x107 PFU/ml) following cGMP guidelines. Comparing nucleotide sequences of eight genes, the NIBRG268-M4 revealed a G/T polymorphism at 505 base of HA gene but NIBRG-M1 only revealed G at the same base. This single base change resulted in a Alanine/Serine polymorphism at 169 amino acid of HA. In addition, two synonymous mutations (C1369T HA gene and C1242T NA gene) are detected. Despite the polymorphism of the amino acid mutation in HA protein, the NIBRG268-M4 was confirmed to maintain similar antigenicity (<4-fold difference) with NIBRG268-egg by measuring HI antibody titers against the post-infection ferret antisera and standard antisera (US FDA lot # H7-Ab-1317). To confirm genetic stability of HA gene, the NIBRG268-M4 viruses were further cultured for 10 passages in MDCK cells. After 10 passages in MDCK cells, HA gene of the NIBRG268-M14 maintained 1 basic amino acid residue in the cleavage site, which is a genetic signature of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses.
Production of vaccine antigens
Using 5 g/L of microcarriers, cells grew to confluence in microcarriers at day 5 or 6 and reached approximately 2×106 cells/ml. After infecting NIBRG268-M4 viruses, virus titers reached approximately 107.5 TCID50/ml at day 3. After purification, the bulk vaccine antigen contained whole virus particles which are similar to the egg-derived virus particles in morphology (Fig. 1).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 1. Electron micrograph (100,000×) of MDCK cell-derived (A) and egg-derived (B) influenza H7N9 virus particles after purification.
Egg-derived influenza H7N9 virus particles were obtained from the US FDA as standard antigens of SRD assay.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793.g001
Immunogenicity in ferrets
Immunization regimens are shown in details in Table 1. Each group contained four ferrets (n = 4) for evaluating HI and neutralization titers at day 0 (prevaccination), day 14 (post dose 1) and day 21 (post dose 2). The GMT and their 95% confidence (95% CI) were calculated for comparison. Without adjuvant, the H7N9 vaccine antigen could not induce antibody responses in ferrets after the first dose of vaccination and only elicited low antibody response after the second vaccination (Table 1). After being adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide, the H7N9 vaccine antigens could induce dose-dependent antibody response after one (HI GMT 48) and two (HI GMT 190) doses of vaccination using the HI assay, which are all significantly higher than that in the control and unadjuvanted groups. Similar results were observed using the neutralization assay (Table 1). Based on WHO surveillance data, the H7N9 viruses which have circulated in China since late 2013 are antigenically similar to A/Anhui/1/2013 strain. Therefore, only A/Anhui-like viruses have been used to generate H7N9 reassortant vaccine viruses and clinical trials using the A/Anhui-like vaccine viruses only evaluated antibody responses to the homologous vaccine viruses [25–27], which is similar to our study.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 1. Immunogenicity of inactivated influenza H7N9 whole virus vaccine in ferrets.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793.t001
Protection in ferrets
No significant side effect and reactogenicity were observed in the three treatment groups during the 7 days postvaccination period after the first and second doses. Within 7 days post challenge, no clinical symptoms could be observed in the three treatment groups. However, two ferrets in the control group developed significant body weight loss (body weight loss: -5.9%, -12.7%, -1.9%, -1.6%) at 3 DPC. In contrast, no ferret in the unadjuvanted (body weight loss: 3.2%, -2.0%, -0.9%, 0.2%) and adjuvanted (body weight loss: -2.9%, 1.3%, -1.2%, 1.9%) groups developed significant body weight loss (P = 0.06, one side Fisher’s exact test; P = 0.04, one side Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test) at 3DPC (Fig. 2). For body temperature change, ferrets in control and unadjuvanted groups revealed mild increase in body temperature change at 2 DPC than that in adjuvanted group. However, no ferret in the three treatment groups had significant temperature increase (defined as temperature increase >5%) (Fig. 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 2. Changes in body temperatures and weights in ferrets within 7 days post challenge (DPC) with wild-type influenza H7N9 virus.
The solid and dotted lines represent changes of body temperatures and weights, respectively. Data are expressed as a percentage of the baseline and the vertical bars represent group standard deviations (mean ± SD). 0–3 DPC: 4 ferrets for each group; 4–7 DPC: 2 ferrets for each group.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793.g002
Regarding virus replication, virus RNA copies in the control group were detected in multiple organs at day 3 post challenge and were more likely to be detected in nasal turbinates at day 7 post challenge. Similar patterns were observed for measuring live virus titers in the control group. In contrast, low virus RNA copies were detected in the unadjuvanted and adjuvanted vaccine groups, but live viruses were only detected in the unadjuvanted group (Table 2). In addition, histopathology and IHC staining in lung tissues of ferrets at 3 DPC were conducted by microscopic examination. Histopathological examination showed that acute inflammatory cells (neutrophils) and cellular debris infiltrated in the bronchioles and alveoli of lungs in the control group. In IHC staining, viral antigen-positive (brown color) cells were also detected in the epithelial cells of bronchioles in the control group. However, viral antigen-positive cells could not be detected in the unadjuvanted and adjuvanted vaccine groups (Fig. 3). Overall, the adjuvanted H7N9 vaccine is highly immunogenic and could reduce virus replication against wild-type influenza H7N9 virus challenge in ferrets.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Fig 3. Histopathological examination and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in lung tissues of ferrets at 3 days post challenge (DPC) with wild-type influenza H7N9 viruses.
Top panel is H&E staining with 100-fold magnification (100×), middle panel is IHC staining with 100×, and bottom panel is IHC staining with 400×. Tissue with brown color indicates viral antigen detected by a mouse anti-NP monoclonal antibody in IHC staining.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793.g003
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 2. Virus titers in vaccinated ferrets at 3 and 7 days post challenge (DPC) with wild-type influenza H7N9 virus.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793.t002
Discussion
Based on online registrations (www.clinicaltrials.gov/) and reports from the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (www.ecdc.europa.eu), as of November 2014 as total of thirteen clinical trials of influenza H7N9 vaccines have been conducted (Table 3). Among them, three clinical trials used egg-derived live-attenuated vaccines, four used egg-derived split vaccines, one used recombinant H7 DNA vaccine, two used inactivated A/Shanghai/2/2013 (H7N9) vaccines, two used recombinant virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines, and one used MDCK cell-based inactivated subunit vaccine, which were all different from our vaccine candidate (MDCK cell-derived inactivated whole virus vaccine). Two clinical studies, including one VLP vaccine and one MDCK-derived subunit vaccine, have been completed and published. The influenza H7N9 VLP vaccine study was conducted in healthy Australian adults and evaluated two doses of VLP vaccine antigens with and without adjuvant. The influenza H7N9 VLP vaccine was not immunogenic at low and high HA dosage level (15 vs. 45μg of HA) without adjuvant (HAI antibody seroconversion rates 5.7% vs. 15.6%) but was highly immunogenic when adjuvanted with saponin-based ISCOMATRIX (60 units) at low and intermediate HA dosage level (5 vs. 15μg of HA) (HAI antibody seroconversion rate 80.6% vs. 64.7%) [26]. Interestingly, the VLP vaccine candidate without adjuvant was highly immunogenic in mice, which is inconsistent with the human study [28]. The MDCK cell-based inactivated subunit vaccine study conducted in healthy US adults evaluated two doses of vaccine with and without adjuvant (MF59). The MDCK cell-based subunit vaccine at 15μg of HA dosage level was not immunogenic without adjuvant but was highly immunogenic when adjuvanted with MF59 (HAI antibody seroconversion rates 8% vs. 85%) [25]. Animal studies of the MDCK cell-derived influenza H7N9 vaccine have not been published and it would be desirable to compare animal and human studies to identify suitable animal models for evaluating pandemic influenza vaccines with different formulations.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Table 3. Clinical trials of influenza H7N9 vaccines until July 2014.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793.t003
It is well documented that ferrets are suitable animals for evaluating pathology and transmission of influenza viruses [6, 29]. However, no standard protocol regarding challenge intervals has been proposed for evaluating immunogenicity and protection of human influenza vaccines in ferrets, which varied significantly in different studies using different formulations [19, 30–32]. The interval between the last vaccination of inactivated influenza vaccines and virus challenge varied from 1 to 4 weeks in different studies [19, 31, 32]. In our study, we selected a 2-week interval for virus challenge and may not exclude the possibility of non-specific innate immune responses contributing to the protection observed in ferrets, which will need further studies to clarify. Besides, it is important to select relevant dosages and formulations for predicting human antibody responses but also no international guidance about the dosage and formulation design is available. In our study, we selected 1/10 of seasonal influenza vaccine dosage (15μg of HA protein) for evaluating MDCK cell-based whole virus antigens adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide in ferrets. Based on antibody responses in our study, immunogenicity of the whole virus vaccine antigens was suboptimal but could be significantly improved when adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide. Further studies of the adjuvanted vaccine candidates with different HA dosages in humans are warranted.
Current egg-based technology could produce about one billion doses of seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines annually but only 500–600 million doses were supplied due to low demand. The egg-based technology requires 6 months to prepare a large amount of embryonated eggs and cannot promptly meet the surging global demand during an influenza pandemic [9]. This was illustrated in the 2009 H1N1 pandemic where only 22% of expected doses were supplied within the first 6 months after the pandemic was declared [8]. Moreover, egg-based manufacturing capacity could be vulnerable during pandemics caused by highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIV) which could kill hens rapidly. Therefore, vaccine production using cell-based technology is becoming an attractive alternative. Our study supports the feasibility of manufacturing influenza H7N9 vaccines in a microcarrier-based MDCK cell culture system.
Currently, the WHO reference laboratories only generate egg-derived high growth reassortant influenza H7N9 vaccine viruses. Therefore, we need to adapt the egg-derived high growth vaccine viruses in MDCK cells to increase growth efficiency, which is time consuming. It would be desirable to establish MDCK cell-derived high growth master donor virus and generate high growth reassortant vaccine viruses for pandemic preparedness through the WHO network. In addition, adjuvant development is also critical to meet surging demand during an influenza pandemic. Due to commercial considerations, we included a traditional alum adjuvant in our study and the alum adjuvant boosted immunogenicity of the influenza H7N9 whole virus antigens in ferrets. It would be desirable to compare different antigen types and adjuvants in ferrets to select the most promising influenza H7N9 vaccine candidates for clinical trials.
Three nucleotide mutations (2 in HA gene and 1 in NA gene) including one single amino acid change related to the Alanine169Serine polymorphism of HA gene were detected in the NIBRG268-M4 virus which has a better growth efficiency in MDCK cells than the NIBRG268-egg in the present study. The molecular determinants of the MDCK cell-adapted high growth NIBRG268 virus are unknown at the moment, which could be elucidated using reverse genetics in the future.
In conclusion, avian-origin influenza H7N9 viruses are circulating widely in China and pose increasing threats to global health. Development of influenza H7N9 vaccines for pandemic preparedness is recommended, especially for countries neighboring China. In this study, we have demonstrated immunogenicity and protection in ferrets of the MDCK cell-derived influenza H7N9 whole virus vaccine adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide. Clinical trials are warranted to evaluate this vaccine candidate.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr Ching-Pin Tsai for providing monoclonal antibody, Dr Lin-Ai Tai at NHRI for taking electron micrograph, the UK NIBSC for supplying the egg-derived vaccine virus (NIBRG-268), the US FDA for providing standard reagents of SRD assay, and Taiwan CDC and China CDC for supplying wild-type influenza H7N9 virus (A/Anhui/1/2013). In addition, we would like to acknowledge team members of Bioproduction Plant, NHRI and Animal Facility, Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: MYC AYCH YSH CTY CPY YCC IJS MSL. Performed the experiments: MYC YFT TCW CCL JYL PLC YFW CTY. Analyzed the data: MYC AYCH JYL MSL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SRC JYC. Wrote the paper: MYC MSL.
Citation: Chia M-Y, Hu AY-C, Tseng Y-F, Weng T-C, Lai C-C, Lin J-Y, et al. (2015) Evaluation of MDCK Cell-Derived Influenza H7N9 Vaccine Candidates in Ferrets. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120793
1. World Health Organization. WHO Risk Assessment: human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus. Geneva: WHO; 2014 June 27.
2. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. A proportionate response to H7N9. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013.
3. Osterholm MT, Ballering KS, Kelley NS. Major challenges in providing an effective and timely pandemic vaccine for influenza A(H7N9). JAMA. 2013; 309:2557–2558. pmid:23700117
4. Horby P. H7N9 is a virus worth worrying about. Nature. 2013; 496:399. pmid:23619655
5. Chang SY, Lin PH, Tsai JC, Hung CC, Chang SC. The first case of H7N9 influenza in Taiwan. Lancet. 2013;381:1621. pmid:23663941
6. Zhu H, Wang D, Kelvin DJ, Li L, Zheng Z, Yoon SW, et al. Infectivity, transmission, and pathology of human-isolated H7N9 influenza virus in ferrets and pigs. Science. 2013; 341:183–186. pmid:23704376
7. Eurosurveillance editorial team. Joint ECDC CNRL and WHO/Europe briefing note on diagnostic preparedness in Europe for detection of avian influenza A(H7N9) viruses. Euro Surveill. 2013;18.
8. Partridge J, Kieny MP. Global production of seasonal and pandemic (H1N1) influenza vaccines in 2009–2010 and comparison with previous estimates and global action plan targets. Vaccine. 2010; 28:4709–4712. pmid:20488262
9. Lee MS, Hu AY. A cell-based backup to speed up pandemic influenza vaccine production. Trends Microbiol. 2012; 20:103–105. pmid:22257962
10. Cox RJ, Madhun AS, Hauge S, Sjursen H, Major D, Kuhne M, et al. A phase I clinical trial of a PER.C6 cell grown influenza H7 virus vaccine. Vaccine. 2009; 27:1889–1897. pmid:19368768
11. Baz M, Luke CJ, Cheng X, Jin H, Subbarao K. H5N1 vaccines in humans. Virus Res. 2013; 178:78–98. pmid:23726847
12. Hu AY, Weng TC, Tseng YF, Chen YS, Wu CH, Hsiao S, et al. Microcarrier-based MDCK cell culture system for the production of influenza H5N1 vaccines. Vaccine. 2008; 26:5736–5740. pmid:18761387
13. Hu AY, Tseng YF, Weng TC, Liao CC, Wu J, Chou AH, et al. Production of inactivated influenza H5N1 vaccines from MDCK cells in serum-free medium. PloS One. 2011; 6:e14578. pmid:21283675
14. Pan SC, Kung HC, Kao TM, Wu H, Dong SX, Hu MH, et al. The Madin-Darby canine kidney cell culture derived influenza A/H5N1 vaccine: a phase I trial in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013; 46:448–455. pmid:23022464
15. World Health Organization. WHO manual on animal influenza diagnosis and surveillance. Geneva: WHO; 2002 July 12.
16. Hehme N, Engelmann H, Kuenzel W, Neumeier E, Saenger R. Immunogenicity of a monovalent, aluminum-adjuvanted influenza whole virus vaccine for pandemic use. Virus Res. 2004; 103:163–171. pmid:15163505
17. Hehme N, Engelmann H, Kunzel W, Neumeier E, Sanger R. Pandemic preparedness: lessons learnt from H2N2 and H9N2 candidate vaccines. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 2002; 191:203–208. pmid:12458361
18. Nicholson KG, Colegate AE, Podda A, Stephenson I, Wood J, Ypma E, et al. Safety and antigenicity of non-adjuvanted and MF59-adjuvanted influenza A/Duck/Singapore/97 (H5N3) vaccine: a randomised trial of two potential vaccines against H5N1 influenza. Lancet. 2001; 357:1937–1943. pmid:11425416
19. Cox RJ, Major D, Hauge S, Madhun AS, Brokstad KA, Kuhne M, et al. A cell-based H7N1 split influenza virion vaccine confers protection in mouse and ferret challenge models. Influenza and other respiratory viruses. 2009; 3:107–117. pmid:19453487
20. van der Velden MV, Aichinger G, Pollabauer EM, Low-Baselli A, Fritsch S, Benamara K, et al. Cell culture (Vero cell) derived whole-virus non-adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine induces long-lasting cross-reactive memory immune response: homologous or heterologous booster response following two dose or single dose priming. Vaccine. 2012; 30:6127–6135. pmid:22884662
21. van der Velden MV, Fritz R, Pollabauer EM, Portsmouth D, Howard MK, Kreil TR, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a vero cell culture-derived whole-virus influenza A(H5N1) vaccine in a pediatric population. J Infect Dis. 2014; 209:12–23. pmid:24041789
22. Wood JM, Schild GC, Newman RW, Seagroatt V. An improved single-radial-immunodiffusion technique for the assay of influenza haemagglutinin antigen: application for potency determinations of inactivated whole virus and subunit vaccines. J Biol Stand. 1977; 5:237–247. pmid:408355
23. Chia MY, Chung WY, Chiang PS, Chien YS, Ho MS, Lee MS. Monitoring Antigenic Variations of Enterovirus 71: Implications for Virus Surveillance and Vaccine Development. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2014; 8.
24. Zhu H, Wang J, Wang P, Song W, Zheng Z, Chen R, et al. Substitution of lysine at 627 position in PB2 protein does not change virulence of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus in mice. Virology. 2010; 401:1–5. pmid:20303563
25. Bart SA, Hohenboken M, Della Cioppa G, Narasimhan V, Dormitzer PR, Kanesa-Thasan N. A cell culture-derived MF59-adjuvanted pandemic A/H7N9 vaccine is immunogenic in adults. Science translational medicine. 2014; 6:234ra55. pmid:24786323
26. Fries LF, Smith GE, Glenn GM. A recombinant viruslike particle influenza A (H7N9) vaccine. The New England journal of medicine. 2013; 369:2564–2566. pmid:24369087
27. Mulligan MJ, Bernstein DI, Winokur P, Rupp R, Anderson E, Rouphael N, et al. Serological responses to an avian influenza A/H7N9 vaccine mixed at the point-of-use with MF59 adjuvant: a randomized clinical trial. Jama. 2014; 312:1409–1419. pmid:25291577
28. Smith GE, Flyer DC, Raghunandan R, Liu Y, Wei Z, Wu Y, et al. Development of influenza H7N9 virus like particle (VLP) vaccine: homologous A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) protection and heterologous A/chicken/Jalisco/CPA1/2012 (H7N3) cross-protection in vaccinated mice challenged with H7N9 virus. Vaccine. 2013; 31:4305–4313. pmid:23891795
29. Belser JA, Gustin KM, Pearce MB, Maines TR, Zeng H, Pappas C, et al. Pathogenesis and transmission of avian influenza A (H7N9) virus in ferrets and mice. Nature. 2013; 501:556–559. pmid:23842497
30. Kreijtz JH, Wiersma LC, De Gruyter HL, Vogelzang-van Trierum SE, van Amerongen G, Stittelaar KJ, et al. A Single Immunization With Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara-Based Influenza Virus H7 Vaccine Affords Protection in the Influenza A(H7N9) Pneumonia Ferret Model. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2015; 211:791–900. pmid:25246535
31. Middleton D, Rockman S, Pearse M, Barr I, Lowther S, Klippel J, et al. Evaluation of vaccines for H5N1 influenza virus in ferrets reveals the potential for protective single-shot immunization. Journal of virology. 2009; 83:7770–7778. pmid:19457991
32. Govorkova EA, Webby RJ, Humberd J, Seiler JP, Webster RG. Immunization with reverse-genetics-produced H5N1 influenza vaccine protects ferrets against homologous and heterologous challenge. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2006; 194:159–167. pmid:16779721
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2015 Chia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Avian-origin influenza A (H7N9) viruses emerged as human pathogens in China in early 2013 and have killed >100 persons. Influenza vaccines are mainly manufactured using egg-based technology which could not meet the surging demand during influenza pandemics. In this study, we evaluated cell-based influenza H7N9 vaccines in ferrets. An egg-derived influenza H7N9 reassortant vaccine virus was adapted in MDCK cells. Influenza H7N9 whole virus vaccine antigen was manufactured using a microcarrier-based culture system. Immunogenicity and protection of the vaccine candidates with three different formulations (300μg aluminum hydroxide, 1.5μg HA, and 1.5μg HA plus 300μg aluminum hydroxide) were evaluated in ferrets. In ferrets receiving two doses of vaccination, geometric mean titers of hemagglutination (HA) inhibition and neutralizing antibodies were <10 and <40 for the control group (adjuvant only), 17 and 80 for the unadjuvanted (HA only) group, and 190 and 640 for the adjuvanted group (HA plus adjuvant), respectively. After challenge with wild-type influenza H7N9 viruses, virus titers in respiratory tracts of the adjuvanted group were significantly lower than that in the control, and unadjuvanted groups. MDCK cell-derived influenza H7N9 whole virus vaccine candidate is immunogenic and protective in ferrets and clinical development is highly warranted.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer