Three-dimensional regulation of transcription

Abstract

Cells can adapt to environment and development by reconstructing their transcriptional networks to regulate diverse cellular processes without altering the underlying DNA sequences. These alterations, namely epigenetic changes, occur during cell division, differentiation and cell death. Numerous evidences demonstrate that epigenetic changes are governed by various types of determinants, including DNA methylation patterns, histone posttranslational modification signatures, histone variants, chromatin remodeling, and recently discovered chromosome conformation characteristics and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Here, we highlight recent efforts on how the two latter epigenetic factors participate in the sophisticated transcriptional process and describe emerging techniques which permit us to uncover and gain insights into the fascinating genomic regulation.

Protein Cell 2015, 6(4):241253DOI 10.1007/s13238-015-0135-7 Protein& Cell

REVIEW

Three-dimensional regulation of transcription

Jun Cao, Zhengyu Luo, Qingyu Cheng, Qianlan Xu, Yan Zhang, Fei Wang, Yan Wu, Xiaoyuan Song&

CAS Key Laboratory of Brain Function and Disease and School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China& Correspondence: [email protected] (X. Song)

Received December 25, 2014 Accepted January 9, 2015

Protein&Cell

ABSTRACT

Cells can adapt to environment and development by reconstructing their transcriptional networks to regulate diverse cellular processes without altering the underlying DNA sequences. These alterations, namely epigenetic changes, occur during cell division, differentiation and cell death. Numerous evidences demonstrate that epigenetic changes are governed by various types of determinants, including DNA methylation patterns, his-tone posttranslational modication signatures, histone variants, chromatin remodeling, and recently discovered chromosome conformation characteristics and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Here, we highlight recent efforts on how the two latter epigenetic factors participate in the sophisticated transcriptional process and describe emerging techniques which permit us to uncover and gain insights into the fascinating genomic regulation.

KEYWORDS transcriptional regulation, long non-coding RNAs, three-dimensional chromosome interactions, epigenetic changes

TRADITIONAL MODEL OF TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION IN EUKARYOTES

Phenotypic diversity of cells and their response and adaptation to the environment are achieved through the regulation of distinct gene expression in particular temporal-spatial context. In this context, transcription control is a crucial step (Levine and Tjian, 2003; Reik, 2007; Hager et al., 2009; Tsompana and Buck, 2014). Many studies indicate that aberrant transcriptional regulation is closely related with development and exacerbation of diseases (Newman and Young, 2010; Harismendy et al., 2011; Li et al., 2013a; Luft, 2014; Yang et al., 2014). Understanding how genome is orderly transcribed is vital for deciphering the mystery of cellular phenotypical changes and homeostasis.

In traditional studies, we usually think of genomes, which encode genetic information in their linear arrangement, abstractly as one-dimensional entities. Traditional models of transcriptional initiation also tend to be static, although gene transcription changes with time to adapt to developmental and environmental cues. The basis of transcriptional activity and regulation is the recruitment of transcription complexes to target genes, which is dominated by an intricate combination of transcription factors (TFs) (Levine and Tjian, 2003; Hager et al., 2009) and other regulators (Visel et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2012).In this process, the core promoter elements provide a platform for anchoring the intermediate complexes which were generally referred to as the basal transcription machinery (Dynlacht, 1997; Ptashne and Gann, 1997; Levine and Tjian, 2003; Takagi and Kornberg, 2006). Other regulatory factors could selectively bind to long-range cis-acting elements (such as enhancers, silencers) to regulate transcription of target gene (Dean, 2011; de Laat and Duboule, 2013). Gene activation may be achieved through DNA looping formation between enhancer-bound TFs and the transcription apparatus at the core promoter. Additionally, insulators ensure cis-elements to interact with the right promoters through the construction of chromosome domain boundaries (Bell et al., 2001; Bushey et al., 2008; Riethoven, 2010). Active transcription can thus be orderly achieved through the collaboration of basal and regulatory factors in RNA polymerases assembly, initiation and elongation. Besides the inuences from trans-acting factors and cis-acting regulatory elements, large number of DNA/histone-modifying enzymes also contribute to local gene activity (Kimura, 2013), both of which could recruit specied protein complexes to regulate transcription without altering the underlying genes sequences.Moreover, DNA methylation and histone modication may serve as good epigenetic indicators of chromatin states, such as gene activation (H3K4me3 and H3K36me3) and repression (H3K9me3 and H3K27me3).

As discussed above, the transcriptional process seems quite simple. However, the actual status of genome in the nucleus is far from that. In eukaryotic cells, the genome is

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

REVIEW Jun Cao et al.

orderly organized into repeating disk-shaped units, nucleosomes, which are composed of histones, their associated DNAs, other chromatin associated proteins and RNAs (Khorasanizadeh, 2004; Woodcock, 2006). The compaction of DNAs into highly condensed chromatin obviously poses many obstacles to nuclear processes that require access to DNA sequence, including RNA transcription, DNA replication, recombination and repair. That is to say, the dense structure of chromatin limits trans-acting factors to access cis-acting regulatory elements (Edmondson and Roth, 1996; Khorasanizadeh, 2004; Berger, 2007). However, to maintain normal physical activities in cells, there also exists a dynamic balance between packaging regulatory sequences into chromatin and allowing transcriptional regulators access to these sequences (Cairns, 2009). Nevertheless, the structural nature of this inhibition and the mechanisms by which chromatin is remodeled to facilitate the regulation of gene expression have remained puzzles for many years. Extensive studies indicate that the complexity of transcriptional modulation is beyond our imagination (Metivier et al., 2006; Warnefors and Eyre-Walker, 2011). Although the genome is the same within an eukaryotic organism, their specic functions are unique due to the cells specic gene expression patterns. As mentioned above, the elaborate nature of genome topological organization in the nucleus makes a great contribution to the maintenance of gene transcription at the right place and the right time (Cavalli and Misteli, 2013; Gibcus and Dekker, 2013), albeit eukaryotic genomes encode genetic information in their linear sequences. Three-dimensional chromatin structure in eukaryotic nucleus makes the gene activity not solely be determined by processes occurring very close to or at the gene locus (Khorasanizadeh, 2004; Misteli, 2007). Moreover, the discovery of interchromosomal or long-range intrachromosomal interactions in higher eukaryotes points to a functional interplay between genome architecture and gene expression, challenging the view of transcription as a two-dimensional process (Gondor and Ohlsson, 2009; Schoen-felder et al., 2010).

CHROMOSOME INTERACTIONS FUNCTION IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION

Many researches revealed that chromosomal interactions can contribute to the silencing and/or activation of genes within the three-dimensional organization of the nuclear architecture (Galande et al., 2007; Gondor and Ohlsson, 2009; Cavalli and Misteli, 2013). The genome forms extensive and dynamic physical interactions in the form of chromatin loops and bridges, which bring distal elements of the chromosome into close physical proximity, with potential consequences for gene expression and/or propagation of the genome. With advances in detection technology, it is now possible to examine these interactions at molecular level. The physical interactions of chromatin bers can be measured by using

chromosome conformation capture (3C) (Dekker et al., 2002) and related techniques including circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) (Simonis et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2006), chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C) (Dostie et al., 2006), and Hi-C (Lieberman-Aiden et al., 2009) (Fig. 1). The common steps in all 3C-related techniques are that chromosomes should be crosslinked with formaldehyde and fragmented by restriction digestion (de Laat and Dekker, 2012). Classical 3C can detect chromosome interaction between two interested loci by checking the ligation products with PCR using locus-specic primers (one to one). 4C can capture genome-wide interaction proles for a single locus with an inverse PCR. It is genome-wild but only focus on a single locus (one to many). 5C approach combines 3C and hybrid capture, so it can identify many chromosome interactions between two large loci (many to many). Hi-C is the rst method that can get unbiased genome-wide chromo-some interaction conformation (all to all). In Hi-C experiment, the restriction ends are lled in with biotin-labeled nucleotides before intramolecular ligation, and the ligated fragments are selected for further analysis with biotin pull-down. These genome-wide advances greatly contribute to our understanding on the mechanism of the genome organization, as well as its adaptive plasticity in response to environmental changes during development and disease. For example, analyses of -globin gene loci and the regulatory regions of the H19 using 4C and 5C have revealed large domains of interacting chromatin bers (Dostie et al., 2006; Zhao et al., 2006). Collaborated with Dr. MG Rosenfeld and Dr. XD Fu (UCSD), we also developed three-dimensional DNA selection and ligation (3D-DSL) method (Fig. 1) and successfully detected the long-range enhancer interactional network in human chromosome 9p21 region (Harismendy et al., 2011). 3D-DSL is similar to 5C to identify chromosome interactions at pre-selected genomic locus (many to many). However, it includes further purication steps which can greatly reduce background and increase signal/noise ratio. A recent study by Fanucchi et al. indicated that co-regulated genes can form long range chromosomal contacts and that these long-range interactions may regulate these co-regulated genes transcription. After knocking down the factors which participate in the formation of the chromosomal contacts, the contacts will lose and these co-regulated genes transcription will not happen (Fanucchi et al., 2013).

The development of 3C-based approaches has strength ened our knowledge of the important roles of chromatin structure in transcriptional regulation. While to establish chromatin topology, architectural proteins are the keys. Architectural proteins interact with specic regulatory elements (proteins/DNA) to orchestrate long-range/short range of chromatin organization across multiple spatial scales. These interactions and chromatin topology would rearrange according to the external environment changes, and these alternations would directly affect the transcription process. The

Protein&Cell

242 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

New trends in transcriptional regulation REVIEW

3C

4C

5C

Hi-C

Reverse crosslink

PCR amplification

Intramolecular DNA ligation

Intramolecular DNA ligation

Intramolecular DNA ligation

Biotin

Reverse crosslink andsecond RE digestion Circulation and

inverse PCR

Microarray

T7 T3

Protein&Cell

Reverse crosslink

T7 T3

Oligo annealing and ligation

PCR amplification and deep sequencing or microarray

Chromatin network (Crosslinking)

Restriction enzyme (RE) digestion

Intramolecular DNA ligation

Biotin

Streptavidin beads

Biotin fill in and intramolecular DNA ligation

Reverse crosslink

Terminal biotin removal sonication and size selection

Pull down biotin, adapter ligation and deep sequencing

A B A B

3D-DSL

Reverse crosslink and DNA biotinylation

DSL: oligo annealing and ligation

Purify ligated primers PCR amplification and deep sequencing

Figure 1. An overview of chromosome conformation capture (3C) and related techniques. The common steps in all 3C-related techniques are that chromosome should be crosslinked with formaldehyde and fragmented by restriction digestion. In 4C procedure, the fragment is further cleaved by a second restriction enzyme and subsequently religated to form DNA circles. The main different in 5C is the library preparation which need anneal and ligate 5C oligonucleotide after reverse crosslink. The Hi-C method adds a unique step after restriction digestion, in which the staggered DNA ends are lled in with biotinylated nucleotides (as shown by the pink dot). 3D-DSL is similar to 5C to identify chromosome interactions at pre-selected genomic locus. However, probes pools were annealed to the biotinylated 3C samples and biotinylated DNA was bound on to streptavidin magnetic beads in 3D-DSL assay. The ligated products were then eluted from streptavidin magnetic beads. This further purication step can greatly reduce background and increase signal/noise ratio.

golden rule in three-dimensional regulation of transcription is that the dynamic balance between effective genome packaging and accessibility within the nuclear space should be established to adapt to environment changes and home-ostasis. In this process, several crucial nodes of genome topology can be proposed (Gomez-Diaz and Corces, 2014). First and foremost, CCCTC binding factor (CTCF), which was named Master Weaver of the Genome (Phillips and Corces, 2009), associated with insulator sequences, boundary elements and imprinting control regions, acts as a

global chromatin organizer to dominate higher-order chromatin into functional subdomains (Splinter et al., 2006; Wendt et al., 2008; Herold et al., 2012). Meanwhile, the distinct patterns of CTCF chromatin binding at dynCTS (dynamic CTCF binding sites) were positively linked with changes during gene transcription that relate to various biological processes (Nakahashi et al., 2013). Moreover, a recent research reveals that CTCF comprises a great majority of sites showing highly dynamic binding patterns during the course of cellular senescence and aging-associate

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 243

REVIEW Jun Cao et al.

diseases (Recillas-Targa et al., 2006; Thijssen et al., 2013). Additionally, mediator forms a complex with cohesion/Nipbl, which can form rings that connect the enhancer with the promoter and provides stability for long-range interactions (Fig. 2) (Parelho et al., 2008; Newman and Young, 2010; Li et al., 2013b). Particularly, 3C experiments revealed that this complex can co-occupy different promoters among different cell types and thus generate cell type-specic DNA loops and affect differential gene expression (Kagey et al., 2010). Recent studies by Tark-Dame et al. indicated that CTCF and cohesin, acting as chromatin looping proteins, are responsible primarily for constructing physical contacts, especially short-range loops, between promoters and enhancers in cell type-specic transcription (Tark-Dame et al., 2014).

Based on these evidences, it is easy to realize that transacting factors and cis-acting elements play vital roles in regulating nearby-gene expression and maintaining genome topology. The identication of individual basal components, especially various TFs and protein markers, makes people used to judge gene regulatory network as protein-centric, which is depending on protein-mediated transcriptional control (Millau and Gaudreau, 2011). However, as Dr.

Shelley L. Berger said, Every global traveler has experienced the disorientation of being unable to speak the local languagethose in the eld of chromatin are in a similar positionwe are faced with observations that cannot be neatly categorized within previous models (Berger, 2007). Thus the above-mentioned studies are just the tip of the iceberg of transcription regulation. More recent high-throughput genomic technologies have now demonstrated that only <2% of the human genome encodes for amino acids in proteins. Undeniably, alternative splicing and post-translational modications make a signicant contribution to the diversity and functionality of the proteome. Nevertheless, at least 98% outcome of genome exists as non-protein-coding RNAs (or called non-coding RNA; ncRNAs) (Mattick, 2011). It became clear that developmental complexity and environmental adaptation probably do not solely rely on protein-mediated three-dimensional transcription. A myriad of ncRNAs may play a decisive role in most, if not all, aspects of gene regulation, especially in these epigenetic processes (Wilusz et al., 2009; Lee, 2012; Schonrock et al., 2012; Dey et al., 2014; Fatica and Bozzoni, 2014; Fitzgerald and Caffrey, 2014; Hacisuleyman et al., 2014).

CTCF

Protein&Cell

Cohesin

E

Enhancer

Chromosome

P

Promoter

E

P

lncRNA

CTCF

E

P

Chr.2

Chr.17

lncRNAFIRRE

Chr.X

Figure 2. A simplied example of how CTCF/cohesion and lncRNAs respectively participate in construction of three-dimensional chromosome network. The lncRNA network was modied from Hacisuleyman et al. (2014).

244 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

New trends in transcriptional regulation REVIEW

LNCRNAS FUNCTIONS IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION

As early as 1990, Brannan and colleagues found a regulatory ncRNA when they aimed to nd the mouse H19 gene which was involved in a particular biological function by screening the cDNA library of a fetal liver. This ncRNA is different from classic structural ncRNAs such as rRNAs and tRNAs (Brannan et al., 1990). With the innovations in next-generation sequencing technologies and computational biology, a seemingly endless stream of ncRNAs are being identied and characterized at a rapid pace. Researches on ncRNAs have now gained the No.1 ranking in the top ten scientic breakthroughs in the early decades of the twenty-rst century (News, 2010; Pennisi, 2010). Over the past f-teen years, small regulatory ncRNA (<200 nucleotides in length), such as small interfering RNA (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), have been extensively investigated and the underlying molecular mechanisms have been well documented, suggesting that these ncRNAs play major roles in many cellular processes (Chitwood and Timmermans, 2010; Stuwe et al., 2014; Toscano-Garibay and Aquino-Jarquin, 2014). The surprises didnt stop at small ncRNAs, and an expanding body of evidence reveals that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs, >200 nucleotides in length), once were described as dark matter, act as essential regulators in diverse cellular progresses. These include regulation of gene transcription (Orom et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2013), dosage compensation (Ilik et al., 2013; Maenner et al., 2013), genomic imprinting (Lee and Bartolomei, 2013; Simon et al., 2013), DNA damage and nuclear organization (Wang et al., 2011b; Wang et al., 2011c; Wan et al., 2013), via a number of complex yet not fully understood mechanisms. Along with the dramatic development in deep sequencing, major hurdles rise to the surface. For example, how these transcripts execute the specic function in different conditions and how to classify them (Derrien et al., 2012; Guttman and Rinn, 2012; Schonrock et al., 2012). Considering only limited information about lncRNAs functions and structures are known, the loci in genome where lncRNAs were transcribed become the top choice to dene these transcripts. Based on the genomic localization and context, lncRNAs can be classied as enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) (Lam et al., 2014), promoter-associtated RNAs (pRNAs or PROMPTs) (Marques et al., 2013), natural antisense transcripts (NATs) (Katayama et al., 2005; Magistri et al., 2012), intergenic lncRNAs (lincRNAs) (Guttman et al., 2009; Cabili et al., 2011; Ulitsky and Bartel, 2013) and intronic lncRNAs (Guil et al., 2012). The detail classication and denition are described in Fig. 3.

Distinct from small regulatory ncRNAs that regulate gene expression mainly through base pairing to target transcripts, most identied lncRNAs play signicant roles in regulating protein activity or maintaining the integrity of protein complex. LncRNAs are larger in length and thus possess complex secondary and tertiary structures. These complicated

structures endow lncRNAs with the abilities to bind DNA, RNA, protein molecules and/or their combinations in the nucleus and cytoplasm, and thus they have multiple regulatory capacities (Wilusz et al., 2009; Wang and Chang, 2011; Yang et al., 2014). Here, we highlight the possible mechanisms by which lncRNAs regulate the transcription of nearby protein-coding genes. The detailed regulatory models and examples are as follows:

1) LncRNAs act as decoy RNAs (Fig. 4A). LncRNAs can bind to transcription factors or some other proteins away from chromatin and prevent them from binding to their proper regulatory targets. Growth arrest-specic 5 (Gas5) lncRNA, transcribed from exon 7 of Gas5 gene, directly interacts with the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) by acting as a decoy RNA version of the glucocorticoid response element (GRE), thus competing with DNA GREs for binding to the GR DBD. Gas5, acting as a riborepressor of the GR, thus inuences cell survival and metabolic activities during starvation by modulating GR-induced transcriptional activity of endogenous glucocorticoid-responsive genes (Kino et al., 2010).

2) LncRNAs act as scaffold RNAs (Fig. 4B). Because of their structural exibility, lncRNAs are well-suited to assemble diverse combinations of regulatory proteins through specic secondary structures to enhance the protein-protein interactions. A classic model is the Yeast telomerase, in which an 1157-nucleotide lncRNA (TLC1) not only provides the template for telomeric DNA synthesis, but also serves as a exible scaffold for tethering TERT/Est1p/Ku/Sm into the complex (Zappulla and Cech, 2006). Our previous results provided another example, lncRNACCND1. It is transcribed from the promoter region of the cyclin D (CCND1) gene and upregulated upon DNA damage, where it acts as molecular ligand for RNA-binding protein TLS and promotes an allosteric effect to release it from the inactive conformation. This recruitment of TLS by lncRNACCND1 leads to the inhibition of the HAT

functions of CBP/p300 and repression of CCND1 transcription (Wang et al., 2008).3) LncRNAs act as guide RNAs (Fig. 4C). LncRNAs can function in cis on nearby gene or in trans on distally located genes through recruiting chromatin-modifying enzymes to targets. LncRNA Air, transcribed form an antisense promoter located in intron 2 of Igf2r, silences transcription of the distal paternal Slc22a3 gene via a specic chromo-some interaction between Air and the Slc22a3 promoter (Nagano et al., 2008). Accumulated Air at the Slc22a3 promoter recruits H3K9 histone methyltransferase G9a in placenta and leads to targeted H3K9 methylation and allelic silencing. Likewise, Xist (Wutz et al., 2002), COLDAIR (Heo and Sung, 2011), HOTTIP (Wang et al., 2011a) can guide changes of gene transcription in cis and HOTAIR (Gupta et al., 2010), lincRNA-p21 (Huarte et al., 2010) and Jpx (Tian et al., 2010) can guide in trans.

Protein&Cell

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 245

REVIEW Jun Cao et al.

P

E

Promoter

Enhancer

E

P

eRNAs

eRNAs

E

P

E

P

NATs

pRNAs

Protein&Cell

P

P

P

E

LincRNAs Intronic lncRNAs

Figure 3. The classication of lncRNAs. Based on the genomic localization and context, lncRNAs can be classied as eRNAs, pRNAs, NATs, lincRNAs and intronic lncRNAs. eRNAs broadly dened as bidirectional and nonpolyadenylated transcripts which are transcribed from enhancers. pRNAs originate from intragenic promoters. NATs are transcribed from the opposite strand of either protein or non-protein coding genes. LincRNAs are transcriptional units,which are transcribed from regions intervening protein-coding loci. Intronic lncRNAs derived from specic introns of protein-coding genes.

4) LncRNAs act as sponge RNAs (Fig. 4D). LncRNAs could competitively inhibit the ability of miRNAs to interact with their target mRNA. The vertebrate lncRNA H19 mentioned above harbors both canonical and noncanonical binding sites for the let-7 family of micro-RNAs, which plays important roles in development, cancer and metabolism. H19 modulates the availability of let-7 by acting as a molecular sponge to specically sequester endogenous let-7, preventing it from inhibiting Rluc expression (Kallen et al., 2013).

In addition to the models mentioned above, lncRNAs can also serve as precursors of some small ncRNAs, interact with other RNAs to form the complementary double strands, and participate in some processes such as RNA splicing and mRNA transcription (Kretz et al., 2013). Terminal differentiation-induced ncRNA (TINCR) interacts with a range of differentiation mRNAs (e.g. KRT80) to mediate their stabilization. TINCR mRNA interaction occurs through TINCR box, a 25-nucleotide

motif which is strongly enriched in interacting mRNAs and required for TINCR binding (Kretz et al., 2013). Besides that, antisense lncRNAs may form sense-antisense pairs by pairing with a protein-coding gene on the opposite strand to regulate epigenetic silencing, transcription and mRNA stability. For example, antisense Uchl1 increases UCHL1 protein levels via an embedded inverted SINEB2 element (Carrieri et al., 2012). In some cases, lncRNAs may have sequence-independent functions, whereby the action of their transcription alone may regulate transcription of neighboring genes (a phenomenon called transcriptional interference or promoter occlusion) (Kornienko et al., 2013).

It is worth mentioning that with the identication of circular transcript Sry (Capel et al., 1993), a new class of circular RNAs (circ-RNAs) has been attracting wide attentions about their biogenesis and mechanisms. Recent studies revealed that circ-RNAs not only can act as molecular sponges by competing and/or sequestering miRNAs (e.g. circular RNA

246 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

New trends in transcriptional regulation REVIEW

GR

A Decoy RNA

lncRNAGas5

lncRNAGas5

GR

Glucocorticoid-responsive genes Glucocorticoid-responsive genes

TLSTLSTLS

B Scaffold RNA

CBP/p300 CREB

TLS

C N

lncRNACCDN1 lncRNACCDN1

N

CBP/p300

CREB

C

CBP/p3

CRCR

REB

R

/p33 0

300

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

B

3300

CCDN1 CCDN1

C

DNA damage

C Guide RNA

C Guide RNA

lncRNAAir

G9a

me3

lncRNAAir

Protein&Cell

G9a

SLA22A3 SLA22A3

H3 H3K9

D Sponge RNA

lncRNAH19

mRNA mRNA

Let-7

lncRNAH19

Rluc Rluc

lncRNAH19

Figure 4. The regulatory models of lncRNAs.

sponge for miR-7, ciRS-7) (Hansen et al., 2013), but also can function as positive regulators of Pol II transcription (e.g. ci-ankrd52) (Zhang et al., 2013).

Although the functions of only a limited number of lncRNAs have been characterized to date, numerous paradigms are emerging. With the advancement of next generation sequencing and RNA proling strategies, further work will likely identify many more lncRNAs and their functional mechanisms.

NEW TRENDS IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL REGULATION: THREE-DIMENSIONAL VIEW

With the development on both chromosome interactions/ structures and lncRNAs, we now should view and study transcriptional regulation in three-dimensional way. That is, chromosome interactions and lncRNAs together form a network of three-dimensional transcriptional regulation. Although both components are important and should be considered as a whole in transcriptional regulation in this three-dimensional view, lncRNAs play signicant roles in organizing and/or maintaining the three-dimensional chromatin network formed by different chromosome interactions.

Thus scientists are paying more attention to lncRNAs mediated regulation, and this is also the focus of our own lab.

Over 25 years ago, RNA was identied to be closely related with the nuclear matrix (Nickerson et al., 1989). Digesting or stopping the production of RNAs, but not proteins, resulted in disorganized chromatin regions inside the nucleus. Increased evidences now indicate that lncRNAs play irreplaceable roles in the establishment of three-dimensional chromatin network (Quinodoz and Guttman, 2014; Rinn and Guttman, 2014). In several dynamic systems, the transcription of lncRNAs from enhancer regions (eRNAs) has been shown to correlate with the transcription of neighboring protein-coding genes (De Santa et al., 2010; Orom et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2011c). Studies with 3C-related techniques subsequently provided evidences for a causal role in the establishment or maintenance of enhancer-promoter looping and activation of gene transcription.

A collaborated work indicated that lncRNAs in MCF-7 cells induced by 17-oestradiol (E2) play important roles in chromosomal conformation (Li et al., 2013b). In this study, we also adopted 3D-DSL method and identied the importance of eRNAs in increasing the strength of specic enhancer-promoter looping initiated by oestrogen receptor

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 247

REVIEW Jun Cao et al.

(ER-). The depletion of E2-induced lncRNAs can affect the chromosomal interaction which in turn reduced the DNA looping events and gene transcription. Furthermore, Lai and colleagues identied ncRNA-activating (ncRNA-a) and revealed that the mediator complex was involved in the establishment or maintenance of chromatin looping between the lncRNA loci and their regulated promoters (Lai et al., 2013). A similar work was also provided by Xiang and colleagues shown that lncRNA CCAT1-L plays an important role in MYC transcriptional regulation and promotes long-range chromatin looping (Xiang et al., 2014). A very recent study provided new insights into the formation of chromatin loops mediated by lncRNAs (Hacisuleyman et al., 2014), where the control range of lncRNAs is no longer restricted to single chromosome. It is found in this work that lncRNA Firre interacts with hnRNPU (nuclear-matrix factor), and brings at least three genes together around their own transcription sites. The co-localization of these different gene loci is lost upon deleting the lncRNA Firre locus or knocking down hnRNPU. This multichromosomal nuclear interaction could be achieved by RNA-protein-DNA loop and bring the specic gene locus into proximity that may be far away in linear sequence (Fig. 2).

Meanwhile, a bulk of evidences suggest that the characteristics of lncRNAs include relatively low abundance, tissue-restricted or cell type-specic expression patterns and localization to specic subcellular compartments. These intrinsic indices of lncRNAs suggest that they are likely representing a previously hidden epigenetic regulator in the determination of cell development, function and adaptation. Given that the degree of organismal complexity scales with the amount of non-coding DNA sequences, it is intriguing to speculate that the increase in regulatory complexity afforded by the dynamic interplay between lncRNAs and chromo-some interactions, which established the dynamic three-dimensional transcriptional regulation, may be responsible for the more complex transcriptional regulation and epigenetic changes in organisms with higher complexity. However, even with the massive increasing information on lncRNAs, we still have a lot to learn. For example, to what degree do lncRNAs participate in construction of genome topology and gene expression? What do they depend on when they form clusters to target gene in spatial proximity? In the process of recruitment to specic genome loci, which way do they choose to executeworking collaboratively or alone? If they choose to collaborate, who will dominate this enrichment process? A recent study demonstrated that a large number of lncRNAs were identied during replicative senescence, with few functions fully understood (Abdelmohsen et al., 2013). With the acceleration of population aging process, the relationship between lncRNAs and senescence-associated diseases has attracted more and more attention (Abdelmohsen et al., 2013). Our lab aims to use 3D-DSL technology together with other genomic techniques to study the molecular mechanism of transcription during cellular senescence, focusing on the roles of lnRNAs, and their

interactions with regulatory proteins (CTCF/Cohesin) and genome loci that form genome topology in this complex transcriptional regulation. We are particularly interested in nding out whether lncRNAs participate in the chromatin network with CTCF. We speculate that during the cell aging, lncRNAs drag different regions of inter/intra-chromosome to assemble specic transcriptional active and repressive regions, relying on the exible structure of lncRNAs. In this process, CTCF collaborates with lncRNAs to establish relatively stable state of three-dimensional chromatin network and regulate gene expression (Fig. 5). This study will hopefully provide new clues on how aging occurs.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Eukaryotic gene transcription can be viewed within a conceptual framework in which regulatory mechanisms are integrated at three hierarchical levels. The rst is the sequence level, i.e. the linear organization of transcription units and regulatory sequences. The second is the chromatin level, which allows switching between different functional states. This regulatory level is close related to histone modication, DNA methylation, lncRNAs and a variety of repressing and activating mechanisms. The third level is the nuclear level, which includes the dynamic three-dimensional spatial organization of the genome inside the nucleus. The nucleus is structurally and functionally compartmentalized, and epigenetic regulation of gene expression may involve repositioning of loci in the nucleus through changes in large-scale chromatin structure. The traditional theory of two-dimensional transcriptional regulation has been undergoing a fundamental shift to three-dimensional modulation. Our understanding of the roles and implications of dynamic properties of the transcription machinery is still in infancy. Thus, it is more necessary to integrate the different epigenetic determinants, especially chromatin conformation characteristics and lncRNAs into a whole to explicate the mechanism of gene transcription.

Emerging developments in technologies have made it possible to create high resolution genome-wide maps of physical interactions along genomic regions and ncRNAs. First of all, in the aspect of three-dimensional chromatin network research, advanced imaging technologies (for example single-molecule RNA uorescence in situ hybridization; single-molecule RNA-FISH) could examine subcellular localization of lncRNA Firre in embryonic stem cells (Hacisuleyman et al., 2014). Meanwhile, combination of technology innovations in probing the folding of chromosomes (such as 3D-DSL and Hi-C) has uncovered an extensive, and previously underestimated network of local and long-range intrachromosomal loops and interchromosomal contacts. Howbeit, light microscopy just affords a resolution of 100200 nm at best, which is insufcient to dene clear chromosome conformation. Electron microscopy, while affording high resolution, is laborious and not easily applicable to study specic loci, not to mention the denite targets of

Protein&Cell

248 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

New trends in transcriptional regulation REVIEW

C

e

l

l

s

t

a

t

:

e

y

o

u

n

g

C

e

l

l

s

t

a

t

:

e

o

l

Cohesin CTCF lncRNA

Chromosome

d

Figure 5. The hypothetical model of how CTCF/cohesion collaborate with different lncRNAs to establish relatively stable state of three-dimensional chromatin network and regulate gene expression in the process of cell aging.

Protein&Cell

lncRNAs. DNA binding proteins fused to different versions of green uorescent proteins permit visualization of individual loci, but only a few positions can be examined simultaneously. Multiple loci can be visualized with FISH, but the resolution for different loci is about 1000 kb. Given the limitation of above techniques and based on the physical crosslinking in the close region of inter/intra-chromosome, the series of high-throughput 3C-associated methodologies can be used to analyze the overall spatial organization of chromosomes and to investigate their physical properties at high resolution in a more systematic and unbiased manner. Notwithstanding, a common problem in all of these techniques is the requirement of a great number of cells, especially in the high-throughput methodologies. Single cell Hi-C method has thus been developed (Nagano et al., 2013), which effectively bridge current gaps between genomics and microscopy studies of chromosomes. Secondly, in the study of lncRNAs function, RNA microarray plays a prominent role in providing reliable and sensitive results to discover the mechanism studies of lncRNAs. With accurate probe annotations and designs to distinguish splicing variants and detect ncRNAs, microarray analysis can get pretty close to what RNA-Seq or lncRNAs-Seq can offer at a signicantly lower cost. The mature software and normalization techniques make analyzing RNA microarray data seem like a breeze. However, microarrays only indicate known and relative rather than absolute transcript levels. If we want to assess rare and whole transcripts, GRO-Seq and lncRNASeq are better options: the dynamic range is orders of magnitude greater than that of microarrays. We believe that the cost and complication of analysis can improve over time, and with the advent of third generation sequencing, which has a lower rate of sequencing error (not enzyme based) and no need for amplication, the future of GRO-Seq and lncRNA-Seq will certainly be promising.

Comprehensive understanding of three hierarchical levels of transcriptional regulator is contingent on the upgrading

and innovation of technologies. These will come in several areas ranging from classic molecular biology techniques to bioinformatics tools. Despite that many mysteries about gene transcription are still under investigation, the overall picture is gradually clear: interdisciplinary techniques that enable imaging analysis of complex in vivo systems will help bridge the gap between live cell imaging and in vitro biochemistry. With research underway in all of these areas, the rapid progress in this eld over the past decade should continue unabated.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful for the anonymous Reviewers, whose suggestions have greatly improved the presentation of this manuscript. We thank Qi Peng and other members in the Song lab for their help and suggestions on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31472059), the National Key Scientic Program of China (No. 2015CB943000), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2070000034, WK2070000023) and the Major/ Innovative Program of Development Foundation of Hefei Center for Physical Science and Technology (2014FXCX009) to XYS. XYS is a recipient of the Young Thousand Talents program (KJ2070000026).

ABBREVIATIONS

CTCF, CCCTC binding factor; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; GRE, glucocorticoid response element; lncRNAs, long non-coding RNAs; miRNAs, microRNAs; ncRNAs, non-coding RNAs; siRNAs, small interfering RNA; TFs, transcription factors.

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICS GUIDELINES

Jun Cao, Zhengyu Luo, Qingyu Cheng, Qianlan Xu, Yan Zhang, Fei Wang, Yan Wu, and Xiaoyuan Song declare that they have no conict of interest.

This review does not include human or animal studies.

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 249

REVIEW Jun Cao et al.

OPEN ACCESS

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

REFERENCES

Abdelmohsen K, Panda A, Kang MJ, Xu J, Selimyan R, Yoon JH,

Martindale JL, De S, Wood WH 3rd, Becker KG et al (2013) Senescence-associated lncRNAs: senescence-associated long noncoding RNAs. Aging Cell 12:890900Bell AC, West AG, Felsenfeld G (2001) Insulators and boundaries: versatile regulatory elements in the eukaryotic genome. Science 291:447450Berger SL (2007) The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription. Nature 447:407412Brannan CI, Dees EC, Ingram RS, Tilghman SM (1990) The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA. Mol Cell Biol 10:2836 Bushey AM, Dorman ER, Corces VG (2008) Chromatin insulators: regulatory mechanisms and epigenetic inheritance. Mol Cell 32:19Cabili MN, Trapnell C, Goff L, Koziol M, Tazon-Vega B, Regev A,

Rinn JL (2011) Integrative annotation of human large intergenic noncoding RNAs reveals global properties and specic subclasses. Genes Dev 25:19151927Cairns BR (2009) The logic of chromatin architecture and remodelling at promoters. Nature 461:193198Capel B, Swain A, Nicolis S, Hacker A, Walter M, Koopman P,

Goodfellow P, Lovell-Badge R (1993) Circular transcripts of the testis-determining gene Sry in adult mouse testis. Cell 73:1019 1030Carrieri C, Cimatti L, Biagioli M, Beugnet A, Zucchelli S, Fedele S,

Pesce E, Ferrer I, Collavin L, Santoro C et al (2012) Long non-coding antisense RNA controls Uchl1 translation through an embedded SINEB2 repeat. Nature 491:454457Cavalli G, Misteli T (2013) Functional implications of genome topology. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20:290299Chitwood DH, Timmermans MC (2010) Small RNAs are on the move. Nature 467:415419de Laat W, Dekker J (2012) 3C-based technologies to study the shape of the genome. Methods 58:189191de Laat W, Duboule D (2013) Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502:499 506De Santa F, Barozzi I, Mietton F, Ghisletti S, Polletti S, Tusi BK,

Muller H, Ragoussis J, Wei CL, Natoli G (2010) A large fraction of extragenic RNA pol II transcription sites overlap enhancers. PLoS Biol 8:e1000384Dean A (2011) In the loop: long range chromatin interactions and gene regulation. Brief Funct Genomics 10:310Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002) Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295:13061311Derrien T, Johnson R, Bussotti G, Tanzer A, Djebali S, Tilgner H,

Guernec G, Martin D, Merkel A, Knowles DG et al (2012) The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis

of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Res 22:17751789Dey BK, Mueller AC, Dutta A (2014) Long non-coding RNAs as emerging regulators of differentiation, development, and disease. Transcription 5:e944014Dostie J, Richmond TA, Arnaout RA, Selzer RR, Lee WL, Honan TA,

Rubio ED, Krumm A, Lamb J, Nusbaum C et al (2006) Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res 16:12991309Dynlacht BD (1997) Regulation of transcription by proteins that control the cell cycle. Nature 389:149152Edmondson DG, Roth SY (1996) Chromatin and transcription.

FASEB J 10:11731182Fanucchi S, Shibayama Y, Burd S, Weinberg MS, Mhlanga MM

(2013) Chromosomal contact permits transcription between coregulated genes. Cell 155:606620Fatica A, Bozzoni I (2014) Long non-coding RNAs: new players in cell differentiation and development. Nat Rev Genet 15:721 Fitzgerald KA, Caffrey DR (2014) Long noncoding RNAs in innate and adaptive immunity. Curr Opin Immunol 26:140146 Galande S, Purbey PK, Notani D, Kumar PP (2007) The third dimension of gene regulation: organization of dynamic chromatin loopscape by SATB1. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:408414 Gibcus JH, Dekker J (2013) The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol

Cell 49:773782Gomez-Diaz E, Corces VG (2014) Architectural proteins: regulators of

3D genome organization in cell fate. Trends Cell Biol 24:703711 Gondor A, Ohlsson R (2009) Chromosome crosstalk in three dimensions. Nature 461:212217Guil S, Soler M, Portela A, Carrere J, Fonalleras E, Gomez A,

Villanueva A, Esteller M (2012) Intronic RNAs mediate EZH2 regulation of epigenetic targets. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19:664670 Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai

M-C, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL (2010) Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature 464:10711076Guttman M, Rinn JL (2012) Modular regulatory principles of large non-coding RNAs. Nature 482:339346Guttman M, Amit I, Garber M, French C, Lin MF, Feldser D, Huarte

M, Zuk O, Carey BW, Cassady JP et al (2009) Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458:223227 Hacisuleyman E, Goff LA, Trapnell C, Williams A, Henao-Mejia J,

Sun L, McClanahan P, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Kelley DR et al (2014) Topological organization of multichromosomal regions by the long intergenic noncoding RNA Firre. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:198206Hager GL, McNally JG, Misteli T (2009) Transcription dynamics. Mol

Cell 35:741753Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B,

Damgaard CK, Kjems J (2013) Natural RNA circles function as efcient microRNA sponges. Nature 495:384388Harismendy O, Notani D, Song X, Rahim NG, Tanasa B, Heintzman

N, Ren B, Fu XD, Topol EJ, Rosenfeld MG et al (2011) 9p21 DNA variants associated with coronary artery disease impair interferon-gamma signalling response. Nature 470:264268

Protein&Cell

250 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

New trends in transcriptional regulation REVIEW

Heo JB, Sung S (2011) Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science 331:7679

Herold M, Bartkuhn M, Renkawitz R (2012) CTCF: insights into insulator function during development. Development 139:1045 1057

Huarte M, Guttman M, Feldser D, Garber M, Koziol MJ, Kenzel-mann-Broz D, Khalil AM, Zuk O, Amit I, Rabani M (2010) A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell 142:409419

Ilik IA, Quinn JJ, Georgiev P, Tavares-Cadete F, Maticzka D,

Toscano S, Wan Y, Spitale RC, Luscombe N, Backofen R et al (2013) Tandem stem-loops in roX RNAs act together to mediate X chromosome dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 51:156173Kagey MH, Newman JJ, Bilodeau S, Zhan Y, Orlando DA, van

Berkum NL, Ebmeier CC, Goossens J, Rahl PB, Levine SS et al (2010) Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467:430435Kallen AN, Zhou XB, Xu J, Qiao C, Ma J, Yan L, Lu L, Liu C, Yi JS,

Zhang H et al (2013) The imprinted H19 lncRNA antagonizes let-7 microRNAs. Mol Cell 52:101112Katayama S, Tomaru Y, Kasukawa T, Waki K, Nakanishi M,

Nakamura M, Nishida H, Yap C, Suzuki M, Kawai J (2005) Antisense transcription in the mammalian transcriptome. Science 309:15641566Khorasanizadeh S (2004) The nucleosome: from genomic organization to genomic regulation. Cell 116:259272Kimura H (2013) Histone modications for human epigenome analysis. J Hum Genet 58:439445Kino T, Hurt DE, Ichijo T, Nader N, Chrousos GP (2010) Noncoding

RNA gas5 is a growth arrest- and starvation-associated repressor of the glucocorticoid receptor. Sci Signal 3: ra8Kornienko AE, Guenzl PM, Barlow DP, Pauler FM (2013) Gene regulation by the act of long non-coding RNA transcription. BMC Biol 11:59Kretz M, Siprashvili Z, Chu C, Webster DE, Zehnder A, Qu K, Lee

CS, Flockhart RJ, Groff AF, Chow J et al (2013) Control of somatic tissue differentiation by the long non-coding RNA TINCR. Nature 493:231235Lai F, Orom UA, Cesaroni M, Beringer M, Taatjes DJ, Blobel GA,

Shiekhattar R (2013) Activating RNAs associate with Mediator to enhance chromatin architecture and transcription. Nature 494:497501Lam MTY, Li W, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK (2014) Enhancer RNAs and regulated transcriptional programs. Trends Biochem Sci 39:170182Lee JT (2012) Epigenetic regulation by long noncoding RNAs.

Science 338:14351439Lee JT, Bartolomei MS (2013) X-inactivation, imprinting, and long noncoding RNAs in health and disease. Cell 152:13081323 Levine M, Tjian R (2003) Transcription regulation and animal diversity. Nature 424:147151Li J, Xuan Z, Liu C (2013a) Long non-coding RNAs and complex human diseases. Int J Mol Sci 14:1879018808Li W, Notani D, Ma Q, Tanasa B, Nunez E, Chen AY, Merkurjev D,

Zhang J, Ohgi K, Song X et al (2013b) Functional roles of

enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 498:516520Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M,

Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO et al (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326:289293Luft FC (2014) Aberrant transcriptional regulation could explain phenotypic variability in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease. J Mol Med (Berl) 92:10111014Maenner S, Muller M, Frohlich J, Langer D, Becker PB (2013) ATP-dependent roX RNA remodeling by the helicase maleless enables specic association of MSL proteins. Mol Cell 51: 174184Magistri M, Faghihi MA, St Laurent G III, Wahlestedt C (2012)

Regulation of chromatin structure by long noncoding RNAs: focus on natural antisense transcripts. Trends Genet 28:389396 Marques AC, Hughes J, Graham B, Kowalczyk MS, Higgs DR,

Ponting CP (2013) Chromatin signatures at transcriptional start sites separate two equally populated yet distinct classes of intergenic long noncoding RNAs. Genome Biol 14:R131 Mattick JS (2011) The central role of RNA in human development and cognition. FEBS Lett 585:16001616Metivier R, Reid G, Gannon F (2006) Transcription in four dimensions: nuclear receptor-directed initiation of gene expression. EMBO Rep 7:161167Millau JF, Gaudreau L (2011) CTCF, cohesin, and histone variants: connecting the genome. Biochem Cell Biol 89:505513Misteli T (2007) Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128:787800Nagano T, Mitchell JA, Sanz LA, Pauler FM, Ferguson-Smith AC,

Feil R, Fraser P (2008) The air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin. Science 322:17171720Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens TJ, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, Dean W,

Laue ED, Tanay A, Fraser P (2013) Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502:5964 Nakahashi H, Kwon KR, Resch W, Vian L, Dose M, Stavreva D,

Hakim O, Pruett N, Nelson S, Yamane A et al (2013) A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redenes the CTCF code. Cell Rep 3:16781689Newman JJ, Young RA (2010) Connecting transcriptional control to chromosome structure and human disease. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75:227235News S (2010) Insights of the decade. Stepping away from the trees for a look at the forest. Introduction. Science 330:16121613 Nickerson JA, Krochmalnic G, Wan KM, Penman S (1989)

Chromatin architecture and nuclear RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:177181Orom UA, Derrien T, Guigo R, Shiekhattar R (2010) Long noncoding

RNAs as enhancers of gene expression. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75:325331Parelho V, Hadjur S, Spivakov M, Leleu M, Sauer S, Gregson HC,

Jarmuz A, Canzonetta C, Webster Z, Nesterova T et al (2008) Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms. Cell 132:422433

Protein&Cell

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 251

REVIEW Jun Cao et al.

Pennisi E (2010) Shining a light on the genomes dark matter.

Science 330:1614Phillips JE, Corces VG (2009) CTCF: master weaver of the genome.

Cell 137:11941211Ptashne M, Gann A (1997) Transcriptional activation by recruitment.

Nature 386:569577Quinodoz S, Guttman M (2014) Long noncoding RNAs: an emerging link between gene regulation and nuclear organization. Trends Cell Biol 24:651663Recillas-Targa F, De La Rosa-Velazquez IA, Soto-Reyes E, Benitez-

Bribiesca L (2006) Epigenetic boundaries of tumour suppressor gene promoters: the CTCF connection and its role in carcino-genesis. J Cell Mol Med 10:554568Reik W (2007) Stability and exibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature 447:425432Riethoven JJ (2010) Regulatory regions in DNA: promoters, enhancers, silencers, and insulators. Methods Mol Biol 674:3342 Rinn J, Guttman M (2014) RNA function. RNA and dynamic nuclear organization. Science 345:12401241Schoenfelder S, Sexton T, Chakalova L, Cope NF, Horton A,

Andrews S, Kurukuti S, Mitchell JA, Umlauf D, Dimitrova DS et al (2010) Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 42:5361Schonrock N, Harvey RP, Mattick JS (2012) Long noncoding RNAs in cardiac development and pathophysiology. Circ Res 111:1349 1362Shen Y, Yue F, McCleary DF, Ye Z, Edsall L, Kuan S, Wagner U,

Dixon J, Lee L, Lobanenkov VV et al (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488:116 120Simon MD, Pinter SF, Fang R, Sarma K, Rutenberg-Schoenberg M,

Bowman SK, Kesner BA, Maier VK, Kingston RE, Lee JT (2013) High-resolution Xist binding maps reveal two-step spreading during X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 504:465469 Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, Moshkin Y, Willemsen R, de Wit E, van Steensel B, de Laat W (2006) Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 38:13481354 Splinter E, Heath H, Kooren J, Palstra RJ, Klous P, Grosveld F,

Galjart N, de Laat W (2006) CTCF mediates long-range chromatin looping and local histone modication in the beta-globin locus. Genes Dev 20:23492354Stuwe E, Toth KF, Aravin AA (2014) Small but sturdy: small RNAs in cellular memory and epigenetics. Genes Dev 28:423431Sun L, Goff LA, Trapnell C, Alexander R, Lo KA, Hacisuleyman E,

Sauvageau M, Tazon-Vega B, Kelley DR, Hendrickson DG et al (2013) Long noncoding RNAs regulate adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:33873392Takagi Y, Kornberg RD (2006) Mediator as a general transcription factor. J Biol Chem 281:8089Tark-Dame M, Jerabek H, Manders EM, Heermann DW, van Driel R

(2014) Depletion of the chromatin looping proteins CTCF and cohesin causes chromatin compaction: insight into chromatin folding by polymer modelling. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003877 Thijssen PE, Tobi EW, Balog J, Schouten SG, Kremer D, El

Bouazzaoui F, Henneman P, Putter H, Eline Slagboom P,

Heijmans BT et al (2013) Chromatin remodeling of human subtelomeres and TERRA promoters upon cellular senescence: commonalities and differences between chromosomes. Epigenetics 8:512521Tian D, Sun S, Lee JT (2010) The long noncoding RNA, Jpx, is a molecular switch for X chromosome inactivation. Cell 143:390403 Toscano-Garibay JD, Aquino-Jarquin G (2014) Transcriptional regulation mechanism mediated by miRNA-DNA*DNA triplex structure stabilized by Argonaute. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839:10791083Tsompana M, Buck MJ (2014) Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome. Epigenet Chromatin 7:33Ulitsky I, Bartel DP (2013) lincRNAs: genomics, evolution, and mechanisms. Cell 154:2646Visel A, Rubin EM, Pennacchio LA (2009) Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers. Nature 461:199205Wan G, Hu X, Liu Y, Han C, Sood AK, Calin GA, Zhang X, Lu X (2013)

A novel non-coding RNA lncRNA-JADE connects DNA damage signalling to histone H4 acetylation. EMBO J 32:28332847 Wang KC, Chang HY (2011) Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell 43:904914Wang X, Arai S, Song X, Reichart D, Du K, Pascual G, Tempst P,

Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK, Kurokawa R (2008) Induced ncRNAs allosterically modify RNA-binding proteins in cis to inhibit transcription. Nature 454:126130Wang KC, Yang YW, Liu B, Sanyal A, Corces-Zimmerman R, Chen

Y, Lajoie BR, Protacio A, Flynn RA, Gupta RA (2011a) A long noncoding RNA maintains active chromatin to coordinate homeotic gene expression. Nature 472:120124Wang X, Song X, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG (2011b) The long arm of long noncoding RNAs: roles as sensors regulating gene transcriptional programs. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a003756 Wang XQ, Crutchley JL, Dostie J (2011c) Shaping the genome with non-coding RNAs. Curr Genomics 12:307321Warnefors M, Eyre-Walker A (2011) The accumulation of gene regulation through time. Genome Biol Evol 3:667673Wendt KS, Yoshida K, Itoh T, Bando M, Koch B, Schirghuber E,

Tsutsumi S, Nagae G, Ishihara K, Mishiro T et al (2008) Cohesin mediates transcriptional insulation by CCCTC-binding factor. Nature 451:796801Wilusz JE, Sunwoo H, Spector DL (2009) Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA world. Genes Dev 23:1494 1504Woodcock CL (2006) Chromatin architecture. Curr Opin Struct Biol

16:213220Wutz A, Rasmussen TP, Jaenisch R (2002) Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA. Nat Genet 30:167174Xiang JF, Yin QF, Chen T, Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Wu Z, Zhang S,

Wang HB, Ge J, Lu X et al (2014) Human colorectal cancer-specic CCAT1-L lncRNA regulates long-range chromatin interactions at the MYC locus. Cell Res 24:513531Yang G, Lu X, Yuan L (2014) LncRNA: a link between RNA and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839:10971109Zappulla DC, Cech TR (2006) RNA as a exible scaffold for proteins: yeast telomerase and beyond. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 71:217224

Protein&Cell

252 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn

New trends in transcriptional regulation REVIEW

Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, Zhu S,

Yang L, Chen LL (2013) Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell 51:792806Zhao Z, Tavoosidana G, Sjolinder M, Gondor A, Mariano P, Wang S,

Kanduri C, Lezcano M, Sandhu KS, Singh U et al (2006) Circular

chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 38:13411347

Protein&Cell

The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com and journal.hep.com.cn 253