Cloning and Characterization of Three Eimeria tenella Lipid Phosphate Phosphatases

Abstract

Although lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs) play an important role in cellular signaling in addition to lipid biosynthesis, little is thus far known about parasite LPPs. In this study, we characterized three Eimeria tenella cDNA clones encoding LPP named EtLPP1, EtLPP2 and EtLPP3. Key structural features previously described in LPPs, including the three conserved domains proposed as catalytic sites, a single conserved N-glycosylation site, and putative transmembrane domains were discovered in the three resulting EtLPP amino acid sequences. Expression of His6-tagged EtLPP1, -2, and -3 in HEK293 cells produced immunoreactive proteins with variable molecular sizes, suggesting the presence of multiple forms of each of the three EtLPPs. The two faster-migrating protein bands below each of the three EtLPP proteins were found to be very similar to the porcine 35-kDa LPP enzyme in their molecular size and the extent of their N-glycosylation, suggesting that the three EtLPPs are partially N-glycosylated. Kinetic analyses of the activity of the three enzymes against PA, LPA, C1P and S1P showed that Km values for each of the substrates were (in μM) 284, 46, 28, and 22 for EtLPP1; 369, 179, 237, and 52 for EtLPP2; and 355, 83, and 260 for EtLPP3. However, EtLPP3 showed negligible activity on S1P. These results confirmed that the three EtLPPs have broad substrate specificity. The results also indicated that despite structural similarities, the three EtLPPs may play distinct functions through their different models of substrate preference. Furthermore, particularly high expression levels of the three EtLPP genes were detected in the sporozoite stage of the E. tenella life cycle (p<0.001), suggesting that their encoded proteins might play an important biological function in the sporozoite stage.

About the Authors:

Aijiang Guo

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China, Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

Jianping Cai

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Xuenong Luo

Affiliations State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China, Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Disease, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China

Shaohua Zhang

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Junling Hou

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Hui Li

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Xuepeng Cai

Affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Key Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China

Introduction

Lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPP) (EC 3.1.3.4) catalyze the dephosphorylation of lipid phosphates, yielding their dephosphorylated counterparts and inorganic phosphate [1]. LPP enzymes have roles in both the synthesis of lipids and the decrease and /or increase of lipid-signaling molecules both in yeast and in mammalian systems [2–7]. LPP enzymes are also called type 2 phosphatidate phosphohydrolases (PAP2) and utilize the broad lipid phosphate substrates, which are characterized by having no Mg2+ requirement for catalytic activity [8]. LPPs are generally conserved in domain and structure. They comprise a three-domain lipid phosphate phosphatase motif consisting of the conserved sequences KXXXXXXRP (domain 1), XSGH (domain 2) and XRXXXXXHXXXD (domain 3), which is essential for enzymatic activity [9–12]. Moreover, LPP is an integral membrane protein with six putative membrane-spanning regions confined to the vacuole and Golgi membranes, with the active site predicted to be at the cell surface or on the luminal surface [11, 13]. A consensus N-glycosylation site is present between conserved domain 1 and domain 2 of LPP protein [14].

The LPPs belong to a phosphatase superfamily that includes bacterial acid phosphates [15], bacterial and yeast diacylglycerol pyrophosphatases [16, 17], yeast LPP [18, 19], fungal chloroperoxidase [20], the Drosophila protein Wunen [21], mammalian glucose 6-phosphatase (G-6-Pase) [22], and rat Dri42 [23]. The roles of LPP enzymes in lipid synthesis and lipid signaling have been described in mammals and yeast [2, 3]. However, little is known about the LPP superfamily in apicomplexa.

Coccidiosis, caused by various Eimeria species, is a major parasitic disease in chickens. With the availability of E. tenella genomic resources, full-length cDNA encoding of E. tenella LPP enzymes (EtLPP-1, -2 and -3) have been cloned in this study. Three enzymes were expressed as His6-tagged proteins by transient transfection of HEK293 cells. The activity of the three immunopurified EtLPPs enzymes against phosphatidate (PA), lysophosphatidate (LPA), sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and ceramide-1-phosphate (C1P) was studied. Furthermore, expression analysis of the EtLPPs at different stages of the E. tenella life cycle was conducted to analyze their possible biological function. To our knowledge, this study is the first to attempt to identify lipid phosphate phosphatases in parasites and will provide a foundation for elucidating their biochemical regulation.

Materials and Methods

Cell Culture

Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Gemini, Calabasas, CA, USA) and 100 U/ml penicillin–streptomycin.

E. tenella infection in chickens

The Lanzhou-1 strain of E. tenella was originally isolated in the field in Lanzhou, China and maintained in the Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute. Parasite oocysts were harvested, sporulated and stored as previously described [24]. 1-day-old pathogen-free ISA Brown chickens were purchased from Xigu Farms, Lanzhou, China. All animals were handled in strict accordance with the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People's Republic of China, and the study was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. LVRIAEC2010-002). The detailed protocols for the care and use of animals and for the experimental procedures were identical to those described in our previous study [25]. The chickens were euthanized with CO2, and then cervically dislocated before removing tissue samples. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Isolation and purification of merozoites

12-day-old chickens were infected with 1×105 sporulated E. tenella oocysts. A modification of the method outlined by M.Q. Xie [26] was used to purify the merozoites. Ceca were removed at five days post infection. Second-generation merozoites of E. tenella were purified using a host tissue digestion fluid containing 0.25% trypsin and 0.5% taurodeoxycholic acid, to liberate the merozoites from the parasitized ceca.

Recovery of oocysts of E. tenella from the ceca and collecting differentially sporulated oocysts during oocyst sporulation

Chickens were infected with 1×105 sporulated E. tenella oocysts at 12-days of age and sacrificed after 7.5 additional days (19.5 days old). Oocysts were purified from the ceca of infected chickens as described elsewhere [24]. Samples of oocysts at various levels of sporulation (1.5%, 48%, and 96%) were collected. Sporozoites were prepared from 96% sporulated oocysts by shocking with glass beads (1.4mm), sporocysts were released, and then incubated with 0.25% trypsin and 0.75% taurodeoxycholic acid in PBS (pH7.6) at 42°C for 30min. Free sporozoites were washed and purified and then immediately used for isolating RNA.

Prediction and RT-PCR amplification of E. tenella cDNAs encoding EtLPP enzymes

The potential ORF-coding LPPs of E. tenella were predicted using multiple alignments of translated protein fragments from the contigs in the E. tenella genomic database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/projects/E-tenella/) and other apicomplexa/model organism homologue enzymes. Total RNA was extracted from sporozoites using TRIZOL (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and reverse transcription was performed using a PrimeScript RT kit (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). The primers used for amplifying the complete coding regions for the putative LPP isozymes are shown in Table 1. The amplified fragments were sub-cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) and sequenced in Shanghai Sangong Biotech Co., Ltd (Sangon, China). Transmembrane regions were predicted by Split 4.0 [27]. N-glycosylation sites were predicted using GlycoEP [28] (http://www.imtech.res.in/raghava/glycoep/index.html).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for PCR and real-time PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.t001

Transient expression of the His6-tagged E. tenella LPPs-encoded phosphatase in HEK-293 cells

The EtLPP plasmids were generated by insertion of the E. tenella LPPs sequence into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1/His (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). HEK 293 cells were plated into six-well dishes and grown to 50–60% confluence in 10% CO2. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine, OPTI-MEM medium (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), and 1–5μg of recombinant pcDNA3.1/His-expressing tagged EtLPP DNA per well. Control cells were transfected with the corresponding pcDNA3.1/His-vector DNAs. The DNA-containing medium was removed from the plate after 24h, and replaced by DMEM containing 10% FBS. After 48h, cells were washed and sonicated in lysis buffer [29]. The membrane fractions were prepared according to the method described previously [29], though with some modification (Ni-NTA agarose resin (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for protein immunoprecipitation). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford protein assay. SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis were conducted according to existing protocols [29].

Enzyme Assays

Molecular Probes PiPer phosphate-release assay was used to measure the EtLPPs activity. This ultrasensitive assay detects free phosphate in solution through the production of the fluorescent product resorufin. Target protein was assayed for phosphatase activity against PA LPA, S1P, and C1P (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the supplier’s protocol. Preparation of substrate was conducted according to the method described previously [29, 30]. The reaction was started at 37°C by adding purified member protein (5μg) to a mixture (final assay volume 100μl) buffered with 0.01% phosphate-free triton X-100 (Sigma) and 1mg ml-1 fatty-acid free BSA (Sigma), pH 6.5, that contained substrate/Triton X-100 mixed micelles. Each reaction was performed in triplicate. The fluorescent product was detected using an Infinite M1000 instrument. The fluorescence value can be converted to the amount of organic phosphate present by comparison with a standard curve, made from the values obtained from the standard curve reactions. The protein purified from an empty vector was used as a control.

mRNA expression pattern of PAPs in E. tenella

The PAP genes expression pattern during the parasite life cycle were analyzed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) using the SYBR PrimeScript RT-PCR kit II (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). Total RNA was extracted from unsporulated oocysts, differentially sporulated oocysts (1.5%, 48%, and 96%), sporozoites and merozoites, and further digested with DNase I (Takara, Japan) at 37°C for 15min. RNA quantities and qualities were determined by spectrophotometry and electrophoresis, judged by the presence of intact 28S and 18S rRNA bands at an intensity ratio of ~2:1. Real-time PCR was carried out in a final volume of 25μl containing 0.4μm of each primer (Table 1), 12.5μl of 2×SYBR Premix ExTaq and varied concentrations of cDNA templates. An Mx3000P real-time PCR machine (Agilent Stratagene, California, USA), with the recommended universal thermal cycling parameters, was used for amplification. Primers designed for these genes were synthesized by TaKaRa (Japan) and are shown in Table 1. 18S was used as an endogenous control. Each reaction contained at least three replicates. The expression of EtLPP1 in cDNA was used for calibration. A no-template control (NTC) was prepared using water as sample.

Statistic analysis

Kinetic data were analyzed by Prism using a non-linear regression. One-way variance analysis (Prism) was used to determine statistical significance.

Results

Sequence analysis of the three EtLPPs

Three cDNAs encoding LPP enzymes were found in E. tenella (KM880158, KM880159, and KM880160). The three LPP enzymes contained three conserved motifs, were designated as EtLPP1, -2 and -3, and consisted of 347, 329, and 318 amino acids (Fig 1A) with calculated Mr values of 38239, 36483, and 34384, respectively. Amino acid sequences were distinct from each other. EtLPP1 was 41.5% identical to EtLPP2 and 28.9% identical to EtLPP3. EtLPP2 and EtLPP3 showed 27.2% identity. Additionally, comparison of the EtLPP sequences with three human LPP sequences disclosed low identical sequences except in a number of conserved regions. All three EtLPPs were shown to be glycosylated at a single consensus site (Fig 1B). EtLPP1 and EtLPP3 were predicted to have six transmembrane regions and EtLPP2 contained 4 putative transmembrane domains, according to hydropathy analysis (Fig 1B). Putative prosphatase-active sites were contained in three conserved domains and all of the domains were predicted to be in extracellular loops (Fig 1B). This structural prediction is similar with that of mouse LPP [12], suggesting that EtLPPs may act as LPP enzymes.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Sequence comparison of EtLPP1, -2, and -3.

(A) the three conserved motifs in LPP family are shown on top of the alignment, three domains in deduced amino acid sequences of EtLPP1, -2 and -3 are listed. The predicted transmembrane topology of each of the three proteins is shown in B. (B) arrows represent glycolated sites. Those amino acids that are essential for activity within the three conserved domains are indicated by letters. Regions of hydrophobic amino acids are denoted 1 to 6, as predicted by Split 4.0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.g001

Expression of the three EtLPPs in HEK293 cells

The purified membrane proteins of the three His6-tagged EtLPPs were confirmed by immunoblot analysis using anti-His6 monoclonal antibody (Fig 2). In comparison with samples from empty-vector transfected cells, major immunoreactive proteins with estimated molecular masses of 40 and 42kDa; 40, 70, and 120kDa; and 37, 60 and 110kDa were detected in cells expressed by EtLPP1, -2 and -3, respectively (Fig 2). The immunoreactive bands of higher molecular weight (above 50kDa), observed in the case of EtLPP2 and EtLPP3, suggest the presence of multiple forms. Additionally, two immunoreactive bands below 50kDa were observed in each of the three expressed proteins (a minor immunoreactive band of EtLPP2 was occasionally observed and is not shown) (Fig 2), and probably represent the non-glycoslylated and glycosylated forms of EtLPPs.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Western blotting confirming of the three EtLPP sizes.

Expression of His6-tagged EtLPP1, -2, -3 or pcDNA3 in 293 cells was separated by SDS-PAGE (12%) and produced immunoreactive proteins by western blot using anti-His monoclonal antibody. Molecular weights of prestained markers are indicated in kDa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.g002

Enzymological properties of the three EtLPPs

In order to confirm that the three immunopurified enzymes function as LPP enzymes, enzyme kinetics was performed. We used the Molecular Probes PiPer phosphate-release assay to detect the fluorescence of the fluorescent product resorufin. The increase in detectable fluorescence is proportional to the amount of phosphate present. As shown in Fig 3A, a line of best fit was used to calculate the amount of phosphate released from each sample. The amount of phosphate released from each protein sample is shown in Fig 3B. The activities of purified EtLPP1 to C1P, S1P, LPA and PA were 18-, 30-, 33- and 70-fold increase by comparison with the control, respectively. The activities of purified EtLPP2 to C1P, S1P, LPA and PA were 111-, 80-, 163-, and 105-fold increase, respectively. The activities of EtLPP3 against C1P, LPA, and PA were 68-, 61-, and 82-fold increases, respectively. However, EtLPP3 showed negligible activity on S1P (Fig 3B). This data revealed that the three cDNAs for the putative LPP enzymes (EtLPP-1, -2, and -3) encode functional LPPs in our assay system. LPP activity was not measured in the cytosol fractions of cells transfected with each of the three EtLPP plasmids (not shown). Additionally, the three EtLPPs were independent of Mg2+ and insensitive to N-ethylmaleimide (not shown), suggesting they are classified as Mg2+-independent and N-ethylmaleimide-insensitive plasma membrane-bound enzymes [31].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. The LPP activity of each purified membrane protein is shown relative to the activity in vector transfected cells using PiPer phosphate-release assay.

(A) Plotting phosphate standards against the corresponding fluorescent values. The data are means ± S.D. from the three samples for each standard. (B) The activities of the three EtLPPs were compared. The cDNAs encoding EtLPP1, -2 and -3 were sub-cloned in to pcDNA3 expression vector and transfected into 293 cells. Purified membrane proteins were used to the enzyme assay using PA, LPA, S1P and C1P as substrates. The values are means ± S.D. of three repeated experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.g003

Purified preparations of rat liver LPP have been reported to hydrolyze LPA, C1P, and S1P, in addition to PA [30]. Similarly, recombinant human PAP2a is highly active on PA and LPA, while PAP2b is active on PA and S1P. Thus, kinetic profiles of the three recombinant enzymes were developed using LPA, PA, S1P, and C1P as substrates to characterize their substrate specificity. The curves describing the kinetic profile of EtLPP-1, -2, and -3 using LPA, PA, C1P, and S1P as substrates are presented in Fig 4 and the derived Vmax and Km values are shown in Table 2. We also compared the relative ability of the different EtLPPs to dephosphorylate each substrate (Table 2). For EtLPP1, maximum activity was higher when PA was used as a substrate. For EtLPP2, maximum activity was higher when LPA was used as a substrate. EtLPP3 showed similar activity with PA, LPA, and C1P as substrates and was much less active with S1P as a substrate. Comparative Km values for the three recombinant expressed enzymes for each substrate showed that LPA, C1P, and S1P appeared to be selected substrates for the three EtLPPs, with distinct affinities. However, three recombinant-expressed enzymes had similar affinities to PA (Km~284–355μm).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. The kinetic analyses of each of the three EtLPP enzymes.

The activities of each of the three EtLPPs were detected with C1P, S1P, LPA, and PA as substrates. Each concentration was assayed in triplicate. The data were analyzed using Prism Graphpad, using a non-linear regression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.g004

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Km and Vmax values for the three EtLPP enzymes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.t002

Expression profile of the EtLPPs

We studied the relative levels of the three EtLPPs transcripts in unsporulated oocysts, differentially sporulated oocysts, sporozoites, and merozoites using quantitative real-time PCR (Fig 5). The presence of three EtLPPs was observed throughout all the investigated stages, suggesting the importance of regulating the balance between the lipid phosphates and their dephosphorylated products in the E. tenella life cycle. Conversely, we noted clearly divergent transcript levels in different cycle stages of E. tenella for all of the three EtLPPs. The three EtLPP transcripts were more alike in their significant upregulation of sporozoites (p<0.001), suggesting that their encoded proteins might play a pivotal role in lipid signaling during the sporozoite stage. Supporting this assumption is the fact that both mammalian and yeast LPPs are known to be involved in lipid signaling pathways [2].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. Expression profiles of the three EtLPPs in various stages of the E. tenella life cycle.

Each of the EtLPP mRNA expression levels was measured based on three replicates using quantitative PCR. Stage 1, unsporulated oocyst; Stage 2, 1.5% sporulated oocyst; Stage 3, 48% sporulated oocyst; Stage 4, 96% sporulated oocyst; Stage 5, sporozoite; Stage 6, merozoite. The symbol (**) represents statistically different expression levels (one-way variance analysis; p<0.001).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736.g005

Discussion

In the present work, the three EtLPPs have been shown to have the LPP activities. The expressed EtLPP2 and EtLPP3 proteins showed variable molecular size, suggesting the presence of multiple forms of these proteins. However, EtLPP1 showed as a monomer. The two faster-migrating protein bands below each of the three EtLPP proteins were found to be very similar to the porcine 35-kDa LPP enzyme in their molecular size and the extent of N-glycosylation [32], suggesting that the three EtLPPs are partially N-glycosylated. The expressed EtLPP1 enzyme protein was found to exist as a monomer, suggesting the LPP activity measured with the immunoprecipitable protein in EtLPP1 plasmid-transfected cells can be accounted for only by an oligomer protein. The result is consistent with the observation that the porcine and mouse LPPs function as monomers with the 35-kDa sub-unit [32]. Additionally, EtLPP2 and EtLPP3 appeared in Fig 2 as monomer, dimmer and polymer forms. Actually, many works have reported that the native PAP shows a very large molecular weight [33, 34]. Siess et al. suggested that the rat LPP would contain a hexameric subunit structure [35]. Homooligomer may contribute to structural or functional stability for these LPPs. Smears were observed in Fig 2, probably caused by the presence of detergents in the enzyme preparation and prevented exact data interpretation. It would be interesting to investigate what forms of the three native EtLPPs exist in E. tenella and whether the three native EtLPPs function as a homooligomer or a monomer.

In this study, immunoprecipitated proteins from cells transfected with EtLPP1 or EtLPP2 gene were shown to have a broad substrate specificity and dephosphorylate a variety of lipid phosphates, including PA, LPA, C1P, and S1P. The data supplied a quantitative comparison of the relative activities of each of the three EtLPPs for the different substrates. The activities of expressed EtLPP enzymes were more similar to those of rat liver LPP, human, and yeast LPP enzymes [30], which are integral membrane proteins and have broad substrate specificity. These results reveal that the three EtLPP enzymes are like human and yeast LPP enzymes, having the ability to attenuate signaling by these lipids while simultaneously producing other signals through the formation of their counterparts. Measurements of the maximal rates and affinities of EtLPP1-3 by different substrate hydrolysis would provide useful information about their biological functions. It is worth mentioning that the three EtLPPs were found in E. tenella, all of which had LPP activity. We propose that the three EtLPPs may function redundantly. This assumption relies on past studies indicating that the LPP isoforms show functional redundancy in certain systems [36, 37]. Similarly, at least four different LPP isoforms have been found in humans [38, 39] and a large number of membrane-associated LPP-like proteins also have been found in bacteria, which have broad substrate specificity [40–44]. On the other hand, the reasons for the existence of different LPP enzymes are probably related to their different tissue and sub-cellular distribution and/or different substrate specificities. Thus, knowledge of the three EtLPP sub-cellular compartmentations may help to determine their different biological roles.

We succeeded in identifying the E. tenella LPP enzymes. Although we presented evidence of differences in the relative activity of the three EtLPPs on PA, LPA, C1P, and S1P, there are a number of questions to be addressed in future studies. Any further study needs to elucidate the physiological role of the three EtLPPs in the metabolism of these bioactive lipid substrates, define the exact sub-cellular localization for each EtLPP and determine whether marked higher-level transcription of the three EtLPPs during the sporozoite stage is related to biological functions of E. tenella. A better understanding of the activity and function of the LPPs in E. tenella will provide us with an exciting approach to inhibiting parasite development within chickens, where sporozoites are the key factor associated with poultry coccidiosis.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AJG JPC. Performed the experiments: AJG XNL SHZ JLH. Analyzed the data: AJG XNL SHZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AJG HL JLH XPC. Wrote the paper: AJG XPC.

Citation: Guo A, Cai J, Luo X, Zhang S, Hou J, Li H, et al. (2015) Cloning and Characterization of Three Eimeria tenella Lipid Phosphate Phosphatases. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0122736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122736

References

1. Smith SW, Weiss SB, Kennedy EP. The enzymatic dephosphorylation of phosphatidic acids. J Biol Chem. 1957;228(2):915–22. pmid:13475370

2. Brindley DN, Pilquil C, Sariahmetoglu M, Reue K. Phosphatidate degradation: phosphatidate phosphatases (lipins) and lipid phosphate phosphatases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1791(9):956–61. pmid:19250975

3. Pascual F, Carman GM. Phosphatidate phosphatase, a key regulator of lipid homeostasis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1831(3):514–22. pmid:22910056

4. Carman GM, Han GS. Roles of phosphatidate phosphatase enzymes in lipid metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31(12):694–9. pmid:17079146

5. Nanjundan M, Possmayer F. Pulmonary phosphatidic acid phosphatase and lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2003;284(1):L1–23. pmid:12471011

6. Brindley DN. Lipid phosphate phosphatases and related proteins: signaling functions in development, cell division, and cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2004;92(5):900–12. pmid:15258914

7. Pyne S, Long JS, Ktistakis NT, Pyne NJ. Lipid phosphate phosphatases and lipid phosphate signalling. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33(Pt 6):1370–4. pmid:16246121

8. Hemrika W, Renirie R, Dekker HL, Barnett P, Wever R. From phosphatases to vanadium peroxidases: a similar architecture of the active site. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(6):2145–9. pmid:9122162

9. Stukey J, Carman GM. Identification of a novel phosphatase sequence motif. Protein Sci. 1997;6(2):469–72. pmid:9041652

10. Toke DA, McClintick ML, Carman GM. Mutagenesis of the phosphatase sequence motif in diacylglycerol pyrophosphate phosphatase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry. 1999;38(44):14606–13. pmid:10545184

11. Han GS, Johnston CN, Carman GM. Vacuole membrane topography of the DPP1-encoded diacylglycerol pyrophosphate phosphatase catalytic site from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(7):5338–45. pmid:14630917

12. Zhang QX, Pilquil CS, Dewald J, Berthiaume LG, Brindley DN. Identification of structurally important domains of lipid phosphate phosphatase-1: implications for its sites of action. Biochem J. 2000;345 Pt 2:181–4. pmid:10620492

13. Waggoner DW, Xu J, Singh I, Jasinska R, Zhang QX, Brindley DN. Structural organization of mammalian lipid phosphate phosphatases: implications for signal transduction. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1439(2):299–316. pmid:10425403

14. Brindley DN, Waggoner DW. Mammalian lipid phosphate phosphohydrolases. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(38):24281–4. pmid:9733709

15. Icho T, Raetz CR. Multiple genes for membrane-bound phosphatases in Escherichia coli and their action on phospholipid precursors. J Bacteriol. 1983;153(2):722–30. pmid:6296050

16. Dillon DA, Wu WI, Riedel B, Wissing JB, Dowhan W, Carman GM. The Escherichia coli pgpB gene encodes for a diacylglycerol pyrophosphate phosphatase activity. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(48):30548–53. pmid:8940025

17. Toke DA, Bennett WL, Dillon DA, Wu WI, Chen X, Ostrander DB, et al. Isolation and characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DPP1 gene encoding diacylglycerol pyrophosphate phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(6):3278–84. pmid:9452443

18. Mao C, Wadleigh M, Jenkins GM, Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Identification and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae dihydrosphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(45):28690–4. pmid:9353337

19. Toke DA, Bennett WL, Oshiro J, Wu WI, Voelker DR, Carman GM. Isolation and characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae LPP1 gene encoding a Mg2+-independent phosphatidate phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(23):14331–8. pmid:9603941

20. Simons BH, Barnett P, Vollenbroek EG, Dekker HL, Muijsers AO, Messerschmidt A, et al. Primary structure and characterization of the vanadium chloroperoxidase from the fungus Curvularia inaequalis. Eur J Biochem. 1995;229(2):566–74. pmid:7744081

21. Zhang N, Zhang J, Purcell KJ, Cheng Y, Howard K. The Drosophila protein Wunen repels migrating germ cells. Nature. 1997;385(6611):64–7. pmid:8985246

22. Pan CJ, Lei KJ, Annabi B, Hemrika W, Chou JY. Transmembrane topology of glucose-6-phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(11):6144–8. pmid:9497333

23. Barila D, Plateroti M, Nobili F, Muda AO, Xie Y, Morimoto T, et al. The Dri 42 gene, whose expression is up-regulated during epithelial differentiation, encodes a novel endoplasmic reticulum resident transmembrane protein. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(47):29928–36. pmid:8939937

24. Long PL, Millard BJ, Joyner LP, Norton CC. A guide to laboratory techniques used in the study and diagnosis of avian coccidiosis. Folia Vet Lat. 1976;6(3):201–17. pmid:1010500

25. Guo A, Cai J, Gong W, Yan H, Luo X, Tian G, et al. Transcriptome analysis in chicken cecal epithelia upon infection by Eimeria tenella in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64236. pmid:23737974

26. Xie MQ, Gilbert JM, Fuller AL, McDougald LR. A new method for purification of Eimeria tenella merozoites. Parasitol Res. 1990;76(7):566–9. pmid:2217116

27. Juretic D, Zoranic L, Zucic D. Basic charge clusters and predictions of membrane protein topology. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2002;42(3):620–32. pmid:12086524

28. Chauhan JS, Rao A, Raghava GP. In silico platform for prediction of N-, O- and C-glycosites in eukaryotic protein sequences. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67008. pmid:23840574

29. Burnett C, Howard K. Fly and mammalian lipid phosphate phosphatase isoforms differ in activity both in vitro and in vivo. EMBO Rep. 2003;4(8):793–9. pmid:12856002

30. Waggoner DW, Gomez-Munoz A, Dewald J, Brindley DN. Phosphatidate phosphohydrolase catalyzes the hydrolysis of ceramide 1-phosphate, lysophosphatidate, and sphingosine 1-phosphate. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(28):16506–9. pmid:8663293

31. Jamal Z, Martin A, Gomez-Munoz A, Brindley DN. Plasma membrane fractions from rat liver contain a phosphatidate phosphohydrolase distinct from that in the endoplasmic reticulum and cytosol. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(5):2988–96. pmid:1993672

32. Kai M, Wada I, Imai S, Sakane F, Kanoh H. Identification and cDNA cloning of 35-kDa phosphatidic acid phosphatase (type 2) bound to plasma membranes. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of mouse H2O2-inducible hic53 clone yielded the cDNA encoding phosphatidic acid phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(31):18931–8. pmid:8702556

33. Fleming IN, Yeaman SJ. Purification and characterization of N-ethylmaleimide-insensitive phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase (PAP2) from rat liver. Biochem J. 1995;308 (Pt 3):983–9. pmid:8948459

34. Kanoh H, Imai S, Yamada K, Sakane F. Purification and properties of phosphatidic acid phosphatase from porcine thymus membranes. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(35):25309–14. pmid:1334090

35. Siess EA, Hofstetter MM. Identification of phosphatidate phosphohydrolase purified from rat liver membranes on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. FEBS Lett. 1996;381(3):169–73. pmid:8601448

36. Zhang N, Sundberg JP, Gridley T. Mice mutant for Ppap2c, a homolog of the germ cell migration regulator wunen, are viable and fertile. Genesis. 2000;27(4):137–40. pmid:10992322

37. Starz-Gaiano M, Cho NK, Forbes A, Lehmann R. Spatially restricted activity of a Drosophila lipid phosphatase guides migrating germ cells. Development. 2001;128(6):983–91. pmid:11222152

38. Kai M, Wada I, Imai S, Sakane F, Kanoh H. Cloning and characterization of two human isozymes of Mg2+-independent phosphatidic acid phosphatase. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(39):24572–8. pmid:9305923

39. Roberts R, Sciorra VA, Morris AJ. Human type 2 phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolases. Substrate specificity of the type 2a, 2b, and 2c enzymes and cell surface activity of the 2a isoform. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(34):22059–67. pmid:9705349

40. Hooks SB, Ragan SP, Lynch KR. Identification of a novel human phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2 isoform. FEBS Lett. 1998;427(2):188–92. pmid:9607309

41. Sun L, Gu S, Sun Y, Zheng D, Wu Q, Li X, et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel human phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2, PAP2d, with two different transcripts PAP2d_v1 and PAP2d_v2. Mol Cell Biochem. 2005;272(1–2):91–6. pmid:16010990

42. Bernard R, El Ghachi M, Mengin-Lecreulx D, Chippaux M, Denizot F. BcrC from Bacillus subtilis acts as an undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase in bacitracin resistance. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(32):28852–7. pmid:15946938

43. El Ghachi M, Derbise A, Bouhss A, Mengin-Lecreulx D. Identification of multiple genes encoding membrane proteins with undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase (UppP) activity in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(19):18689–95. pmid:15778224

44. Zhang Y, Yang Z, Huang X, Peng J, Fei X, Gu S, et al. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a thermostable PAP2L2, a new member of the type-2 phosphatidic acid phosphatase family from Geobacillus toebii T-85. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72(12):3134–41. pmid:19060391