Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
R E S E A R C H Open Access
Uniqueness results for fully anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems with nonlinearity depending on lower-order derivatives
Ahmed Alsaedi1*, Bashir Ahmad1, Nadia Mohamad1 and Sotiris K Ntouyas2
*Correspondence: [email protected]
1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi ArabiaFull list of author information is available at the end of the article
Abstract
We investigate the uniqueness of solutions for fully anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems of order 2 < q 3 with nonlinearity depending on lower-order
fractional derivatives. Our results are based on some standard xed point theorems. The paper concludes with illustrative examples.
MSC: 34A12; 34A40
Keywords: dierential equations of fractional order; anti-periodic fractional boundary conditions; uniqueness; xed point
1 Introduction
In this article, we show the existence of solutions for a fully fractional-order anti-periodic boundary value problem of the form
cDqx(t) = f t, x(t), cDrx(t) , t [, T], T > , < q , < r , (.)
x() = x(T), cDpx() = cDpx(T),
cDp+x() = cDp+x(T), < p < ,
(.)
where cDq denotes the Caputo fractional derivative of order q and f is a given continuous function.
As a second problem, we will discuss the existence of solutions for the following fractional dierential equation with the boundary conditions (.):
cDqx(t) = f t, x(t), cDrx(t), cDr+x(t) , t [, T], T > , < q , < r . (.)
The present work is motivated by a recent paper [] in which the problem (.)-(.) was discussed with the nonlinearity of the type f (t, x). Thus the present paper generalizes the results obtained in [].
In the last few decades, fractional calculus has evolved as an attractive eld of research in view of its extensive applications in basic and technical sciences. Examples can be found
2014 Alsaedi et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons At
tribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 2 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
in physics, chemistry, biology, economics, control theory, signal and image processing, biophysics, blood ow phenomena, aerodynamics, tting of experimental data, etc. [].
The subject of boundary value problems of dierential equations, having an enriched history, has been progressing at the same pace as before. In the context of fractional boundary value problems, there has been a much development in the last ten years; for instance, see [] and the references cited therein.
In view of the importance of anti-periodic boundary conditions in the mathematical modeling of a variety of physical processes [], the study of anti-periodic boundary value problems has received considerable attention. Some recent work on anti-periodic boundary value problems of fractional order can be found in a series of papers [] and the references therein.
2 Preliminaries
We begin this section with some basic concepts [, ].
Denition . The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order q for a continuous function g is dened as
Iqg(t) =
(q)
t
g(s)(t s)q ds, q > ,
provided the integral exists.
Denition . For a function g ACn([, ),
R), the Caputo derivative of fractional
order q is dened as
cDqg(t) =
(n q)
t (t s)nqg(n)(s) ds, n < q < n, n = [q] + , where [q] denotes the integer part of the real number q.
Lemma . [] For any y C[, T], the unique solution of the linear fractional equation
cDqx(t) = y(t), < t < T, < q with anti-periodic boundary conditions (.) is given by x(t) =
T G(t, s)y(s) ds,where G(t, s) is the Greens function (depending on q and p) given by
G(t, s) =
(ts)q(Ts)q
(q) + (p)(Tt)(Ts)
qp
Tp (qp)
+ ( (p))
Tp(Ts)qp (qp) (p) {(T
t) (p)
(p) T + tT}, s t,
(Ts)
q
(q) + (p)(Tt)(Ts)
qp
Tp (qp)
+ ( (p))
Tp(Ts)qp (qp) (p) {(T
t) (p)
(p) T + tT}, t < s.
3 Uniqueness of solutions
This section is devoted to the uniqueness of solutions for the problems at hand by means of Banachs contraction principle.
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 3 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
3.1 Uniqueness result for the problem (1.1)-(1.2)
For < r , let us dene a space C = {x : x, cDrx C([, T])}, where C([, T]) denotes the space of all continuous functions dened on [, T]. Note that the space C endowed with the norm dened by x = sup{|x(t)| + |cDrx(t)|, t [, T]} is a Banach space.
In view of Lemma ., let us dene an operator G : C C associated with the problem (.)-(.) as
(Gx)(t) =
t
(q) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
(t s)q
T
(q) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
(T s)q
+ (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
+ (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds, (.)
where
(t) =
(p) + tT (p) (p))
Tp .
Observe that the problem (.)-(.) has a solution only if the operator G has a xed point.
Before proceeding further, let us introduce some notations:
N = max{N, N}, (.)
where
N = Tq
(q + ) +
( p)(T t) Tp ,
(t) =
( p)(T t (p)T
( p) (q p + ) +
( p) (q p)
( p) ( p) + ( p) ( p)
,
N = Tqr
(q r + ) +
( p) ( r) (q p + )
+
( p) (q p)
( p) ( p) ( r)
( r)
.
Theorem . Assume that f : [, T]
R
R
R is a continuous function satisfying the
condition
f
(t, x, x) f (t, y, y)
L |x
y| + |x y| ,
t [, T], x, y, x, y
R
with L < N, where N is given by (.). Then the anti-periodic boundary value problem (.)-(.) has a unique solution.
Proof Let us set supt[,T] |f (t, , )| = M < and R MN( LN) to show that GBR BR, where BR = {x C : x R}. For x BR, we have
(
Gx)(t)
t
(t s)q
(q)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
+
T
(T s)q
(q)
f
s, x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 4 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
t
(t s)q
(q)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
f (s, , )
+
f
(s, , )
ds
+
T
(T s)q
(q)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
f (s, , )
+
f
(s, , )
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
f (s, , )
+
f
(s, , )
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
f (s, , )
+
f
(s, , )
ds
(LR + M)
t
(t s)q
(q) ds +
T
(T s)q
(q) ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p) ds + (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p ) ds
(LR + M)N (LR + M)N R.
Using the facts cDrb = (b is a constant), cDrt = t
r (r) , cDrt =
tr (r) , cDr+t =
tr (r) , for
< r < , we get
cDrGx (t) = t(t s)qr (q r) f s,x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
( p)tr
( r)Tp
T
(T s)qp
(q p) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds
+ ( p)Tp
Ttr ( p)
( p) ( r)
tr
( r)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )f s,
x(s), cDrx(s)
ds.
As in the previous step, it can be shown that
cDr
Gx (t)
(LR + M)N (LR + M)N R.
Thus we get Gx BR. Hence GBR BR. Next, for x, x C and for each t [, T], we obtain
(
Gx)(t) (Gx)(t)
t
(t s)q
(q)
f s,
x, cDrx
f
s, x, cDrx
ds
+
T
(T s)q
(q)
f s,
x, cDrx
f
s, x, cDrx
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p)
f
s, x, cDrx
f
s, x, cDrx
ds
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 5 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )
f s,
x, cDrx
f
s, x, cDrx
ds
L x x
t
(t s)q
(q) ds +
T
(T s)q
(q) ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p) ds + (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p ) ds
< LN x x LN x x .
In a similar manner, we nd that
cDr
Gx (t) cDrG
x
(t)
LN x x LN x x .
By the given assumption, L < /N, it follows that the operator G is a contraction. Thus, the conclusion of the theorem follows by the contraction mapping principle (Banach xed point theorem).
3.2 Uniqueness result for the problem (1.3)-(1.2)
Here, we study the uniqueness of solutions for the problem of (.)-(.). For that, let
C = {x : x, cDrx, cDr+x(t) C([, T])} be a Banach space endowed with the norm x =
sup{|x(t)| + |cDrx(t)| + |cDr+x(t)|, t [, T]}, < r .Relative to the problem (.)-(.), we dene an operator
G :
C
C as
(
Gx)(t) =
t
(q) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(s)
ds
(t s)q
T
(T s)q
(q) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(s)
ds
+ (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p) f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(s)
ds
+ (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(s)
ds. (.)
In what follows, we set
N = max{N, N}, (.)
where N is given by (.) and
N = Tqr
(q r) +
( p) ( r) (q p)
.
R be a continuous function and there exists a positive number L < / N such that
f
(t, x, x, x) f (t, y, y, y)
Theorem . Let f : [, T]
R
R
L |x
y| + |x y| + |x y| ,
t [, T], x, y, x, y, x, y
R.
Then the anti-periodic boundary value problem (.)-(.) has a unique solution on [, T].
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 6 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Proof We dene BR = {x
C : x R}, R
M N
L N , M = supt[,T] |f (t, , , )| < and
show that
GBR BR. In view of the given assumption, we have
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(t)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(t)
f (t, , , )
+
f
(t, , , )
L R + M, x BR. (.)
Thus
(
Gx)(t)
t
(t s)q
(q)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(t)
ds
+
T
(T s)q
(q)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(t)
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p)
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(t)
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )
f s,
x(s), cDrx(s), cDr+x(t)
ds
(L R + M)
t
(t s)q
(q) ds +
T
(T s)q
(q) ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p) ds + (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p ) ds
(L R + M)N
(L R + M) N R.
Further, it can be shown in a similar way that
cDr
Gx (t)
(LR + M)N (L R + M) N R,
cDr+
Gx (t)
(LR + M)N (LR + M) N R.
Next, for x, x
C and for each t [, T], we obtain
(
Gx)(t) (
Gx)(t)
t
(t s)q
(q)
f s,
x, cDrx, cDr+x
f
s, x, cDrx, cDr+x
ds
+
T
(T s)q
(q)
f s,
x, cDrx, cDr+x
f
s, x, cDrx, cDr+x
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p)
f s,
x, cDrx, cDr+x
f
s, x, cDrx, cDr+x
ds
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p )
f s,
x, cDrx, cDr+x
f
s, x, cDrx, cDr+x
ds
L x x
t
(t s)q
(q) ds +
T
(T s)q
(q) ds
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 7 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
+
(t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p) ds + (t)
T
(T s)qp
(q p ) ds
< LN x x L N x x .
Also, we have
cDr
Gx (t)
LN x x L N x x ,
cDr+
Gx (t) cDr+
Gx (t)
LN x x L N x x .
Since L < / N, therefore, the operator
G is a contraction. Thus, it follows by the contraction mapping principle that the problem (.)-(.) has a unique solution on [, T].
4 Examples
(a) Consider the anti-periodic fractional boundary value problem given by
cD
x(t) = L
|
x(t)| + |x(t)|
+
+ t
|cD
x(t)| + |cD
+ +
sin t, L > , t [, ],
x(t)|
x() = x(), cD
x() = cD
x(), cD
x() = cD
x(), (.)
where q = /, p = /, r = /, T = , and
f (t, x, x) = L |
x| + |x|
+
+ t
|x| + |x|
+ + sin t, x = cD x(t).
Clearly
f
(t, x, x) f (t, y, y)
L
x + x
y + y
+
x + x
y
+ y
L |x
y| + |x y| ,
N =
+
, N =
.
With L < /N (N = N > N), all the assumptions of Theorem . hold. Therefore, the problem (.) has a unique solution on [, ].(b) Consider the following anti-periodic fractional boundary value problem:
cD
x(t) = L |
x(t)| + |x(t)|
+ tan
cD
x(t)
+ cos t
|c
D x(t)|
+ |cD
x(t)|
+ et, L > , t [, ],
x() = x(), cD
x() = cD
x(), cD
x() = cD
x(), (.)
where q = /, p = /, r = /, T = . With x = cD
x(t), x = cD
x(t), we can write
f (t, x, x, x) = L |
x| + |x|
+ tan
(
x)
+ cos t
|
x| + |x|
+ et.
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 8 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Furthermore, we have
f
(t, x, x, x) f (t, y, y, y)
N =
L |x
y| + |x y| + |x y ,
(/) (/), N = +
(/)
(/).
Clearly all the assumptions of Theorem . are satised with L < / N ( N = N > N > N). Hence, the problem (.) has a unique solution on [, ].
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors contributions
Each of the authors, AA, BA, NM, and SKN, contributed to each part of this work equally and read and approved the nal version of the manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80203, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
2Department of Mathematics, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 451 10, Greece.
Authors information
Sotiris K Ntouyas is a member of Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM) - Research Group at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the Deanship of Scientic Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Received: 20 February 2014 Accepted: 2 April 2014 Published: 7 May 2014
References
1. Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ, Alsaedi, A, Mohamad, N: On a new class of anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2013, Article ID 606454 (2013)
2. Baleanu, D, Diethelm, K, Scalas, E, Trujillo, JJ: Fractional Calculus Models and Numerical Methods. Series on Complexity, Nonlinearity and Chaos. World Scientic, Boston (2012)
3. Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Dierential Equations. North-Holland Mathematics Studies, vol. 204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
4. Podlubny, I: Fractional Dierential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)5. Sabatier, J, Agrawal, OP, Machado, JAT (eds.): Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
6. Agarwal, RP, Andrade, B, Cuevas, C: Weighted pseudo-almost periodic solutions of a class of semilinear fractional dierential equations. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 11, 3532-3554 (2010)
7. Agarwal, RP, Ntouyas, SK, Ahmad, B, Alhothuali, MS: Existence of solutions for integro-dierential equations of fractional order with nonlocal three-point fractional boundary conditions. Adv. Dier. Equ. 2013, 128 (2013)
8. Ahmad, B: On nonlocal boundary value problems for nonlinear integro-dierential equations of arbitrary fractional order. Results Math. 63, 183-194 (2013)
9. Bai, ZB: On positive solutions of a nonlocal fractional boundary value problem. Nonlinear Anal. 72, 916-924 (2010)10. Bai, C: Existence of solutions for a nonlinear fractional boundary value problem via a local minimum theorem. Electron. J. Dier. Equ. 2012, 176 (2012)
11. Caballero, J, Harjani, J, Sadarangani, K: On existence and uniqueness of positive solutions to a class of fractional boundary value problems. Bound. Value Probl. 2011, 25 (2011)
12. Chen, F: Coincidence degree and fractional boundary value problems with impulses. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 3444-3455 (2012)
13. Ding, X-L, Jiang, Y-L: Analytical solutions for the multi-term time-space fractional advection-diusion equations with mixed boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 14, 1026-1033 (2013)
14. Ford, NJ, Morgado, ML: Fractional boundary value problems: analysis and numerical methods. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 14(4), 554-567 (2011)
15. Gaychuk, V, Datsko, B, Meleshko, V: Mathematical modeling of dierent types of instabilities in time fractional reaction-diusion systems. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 1101-1107 (2010)
16. Graef, JR, Kong, L, Kong, Q, Wang, M: Uniqueness of positive solutions of fractional boundary value problems with non-homogeneous integral boundary conditions. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 15, 509-528 (2012)
17. Graef, JR, Kong, L, Yang, B: Positive solutions for a semipositone fractional boundary value problem with a forcing term. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 15, 8-24 (2012)
18. Wang, G, Liu, S, Baleanu, D, Zhang, L: Existence results for nonlinear fractional dierential equations involving dierent Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. Adv. Dier. Equ. 2013, 280 (2013)
19. Hernndez, E, ORegan, D, Balachandran, K: Existence results for abstract fractional dierential equations with nonlocal conditions via resolvent operators. Indag. Math. 24, 68-82 (2013)
(/) (/), N =
+
Alsaedi et al. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014, 2014:136 Page 9 of 9 http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
Web End =http://www.advancesindifferenceequations.com/content/2014/1/136
20. Jarad, F, Abdeljawad, T, Baleanu, D: Stability of q-fractional non-autonomous systems. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 14, 780-784 (2013)
21. Lizama, C: Solutions of two-term time fractional order dierential equations with nonlocal initial conditions. Electron.J. Qual. Theory Dier. Equ. 2012, 82 (2012)22. Machado, JT, Galhano, AM, Trujillo, JJ: Science metrics on fractional calculus development since 1966. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 16, 479-500 (2013)
23. Sun, H-R, Zhang, Q-G: Existence of solutions for a fractional boundary value problem via the mountain pass method and an iterative technique. Comput. Math. Appl. 64, 3436-3443 (2012)
24. Wang, Y, Liu, L, Wu, Y: Positive solutions for a class of fractional boundary value problem with changing sign nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 6434-6441 (2011)
25. Zhao, X, Chai, C, Ge, W: Existence and nonexistence results for a class of fractional boundary value problems. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 41, 17-31 (2013)
26. Aubertin, M, Henneron, T, Piriou, F, Guerin, P, Mipo, J-C: Periodic and anti-periodic boundary conditions with the Lagrange multipliers in the FEM. IEEE Trans. Magn. 46, 3417-3420 (2010)
27. Cardy, JL: Finite-size scaling in strips: antiperiodic boundary conditions. J. Phys. A, Math. Gen. 17, L961-L964 (1984)28. Chen, Y, Nieto, JJ, ORegan, D: Anti-periodic solutions for evolution equations associated with maximal monotone mappings. Appl. Math. Lett. 24, 302-307 (2011)
29. Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ: Existence of solutions for anti-periodic boundary value problems involving fractional dierential equations via Leray-Schauder degree theory. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 35, 295-304 (2010)
30. Ahmad, B, Nieto, JJ: Anti-periodic fractional boundary value problem with nonlinear term depending on lower order derivative. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 15, 451-462 (2012)
31. Benchohra, M, Hamidi, N, Henderson, J: Fractional dierential equations with anti-periodic boundary conditions. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 34, 404-414 (2013)
32. Fang, W, Zhenhai, L: Anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems for nonlinear dierential equations of fractional order. Adv. Dier. Equ. 2012, 116 (2012)
33. Wang, G, Ahmad, B, Zhang, L: Impulsive anti-periodic boundary value problem for nonlinear dierential equations of fractional order. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 792-804 (2011)
34. Wang, X, Guo, X, Tang, G: Anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems for nonlinear dierential equations of fractional order. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 41, 367-375 (2013)
doi:10.1186/1687-1847-2014-136Cite this article as: Alsaedi et al.: Uniqueness results for fully anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems with nonlinearity depending on lower-order derivatives. Advances in Dierence Equations 2014 2014:136.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
The Author(s) 2014
Abstract
We investigate the uniqueness of solutions for fully anti-periodic fractional boundary value problems of order [InlineEquation not available: see fulltext.] with nonlinearity depending on lower-order fractional derivatives. Our results are based on some standard fixed point theorems. The paper concludes with illustrative examples.
MSC: 34A12, 34A40.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer