Comparative Oncology: Evaluation of 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Staging of Dogs with Malignant Tumors

Abstract

Introduction

2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose PET/CT is a well-established imaging method for staging, restaging and therapy-control in human medicine. In veterinary medicine, this imaging method could prove to be an attractive and innovative alternative to conventional imaging in order to improve staging and restaging. The aim of this study was both to evaluate the effectiveness of this image-guided method in canine patients with spontaneously occurring cancer as well as to illustrate the dog as a well-suited animal model for comparative oncology.

Methods

Ten dogs with various malignant tumors were included in the study and underwent a whole body FDG PET/CT. One patient has a second PET-CT 5 months after the first study. Patients were diagnosed with histiocytic sarcoma (n = 1), malignant lymphoma (n = 2), mammary carcinoma (n = 4), sertoli cell tumor (n = 1), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (n = 1) and lung tumor (n = 1). PET/CT data were analyzed with the help of a 5-point scale in consideration of the patients’ medical histories.

Results

In seven of the ten dogs, the treatment protocol and prognosis were significantly changed due to the results of FDG PET/CT. In the patients with lymphoma (n = 2) tumor extent could be defined on PET/CT because of increased FDG uptake in multiple lymph nodes. This led to the recommendation for a therapeutic polychemotherapy as a treatment. In one of the dogs with mammary carcinoma (n = 4) and in the patient with the lung tumor (n = 1), surgery was cancelled due to the discovery of multiple metastasis. Consequently no treatment was recommended.

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT offers additional information in canine patients with malignant disease with a potential improvement of staging and restaging. The encouraging data of this clinical study highlights the possibility to further improve innovative diagnostic and staging methods with regard to comparative oncology. In the future, performing PET/CT not only for staging but also in therapy control could offer a significant improvement in the management of dogs with malignant tumors.

About the Authors:

Stefanie M. F. Seiler

Contributed equally to this work with: Stefanie M. F. Seiler, Christine Baumgartner, Johannes Hirschberger, Markus Schwaiger

Affiliations Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany, Center of Preclinical Research, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Christine Baumgartner

Contributed equally to this work with: Stefanie M. F. Seiler, Christine Baumgartner, Johannes Hirschberger, Markus Schwaiger

Affiliation: Center of Preclinical Research, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Johannes Hirschberger

Contributed equally to this work with: Stefanie M. F. Seiler, Christine Baumgartner, Johannes Hirschberger, Markus Schwaiger

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany

Ambros J. Beer

Current address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Uniklinik Ulm, Albert Einstein Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.

¶‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Andreas Brühschwein

Affiliation: Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Veterinary Faculty, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany

Nina Kreutzmann

Affiliation: Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany

Silja Laberke

Affiliation: Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany

Melanie C. Wergin

Affiliation: Clinic of Small Animal Medicine, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany

Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

¶‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

Affiliation: Clinic for Small Animal Surgery and Reproduction, Veterinary Faculty, Ludwig, Maximilians Universität, 80539, Munich, Germany

Johanna Brandl

Affiliation: Center of Preclinical Research, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Anne-Kathrin von Thaden

Current address: German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Affiliation: Center of Preclinical Research, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Eliane Farrell

Affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Markus Schwaiger

Contributed equally to this work with: Stefanie M. F. Seiler, Christine Baumgartner, Johannes Hirschberger, Markus Schwaiger

Affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, 81675, Munich, Germany

Introduction

Cancer is the leading cause of death in dogs as 27% die from malignant tumors [1]. Therefore one of the main goals in veterinary oncology is improving diagnostic techniques to allow earlier recognition of tumors in dogs and cats which is essential for successful therapeutic interventions.

PET/CT is a new attractive method for non-invasive staging, restaging and monitoring of response to therapy in veterinary medicine. In human medicine, the use of PET/CT was first described in 2000. Since then, whole body PET/CT in humans has shown to be a useful tool for diagnosis, staging and monitoring of various malignancies [2–4]. This technique significantly improves imaging of tumors compared with either PET or CT alone [5,6]. However, the use of PET/CT in veterinary patients has been limited due to the lack of access to dual-modality hybrid PET/CT scanners. The high costs of the equipment and the production of tracers immediately before their use precluded a widespread use of this technique in veterinary medicine up to now.

The use of PET/CT in dogs is reported in a number of studies [7–19]. The first use of FDG-PET in dogs with spontaneously occurring osteosarcoma and lymphoma was described in 1981. This study demonstrated increased FDG uptake in spontaneous canine malignancies. Increased FDG uptake was present in both the primary tumors and in metastatic lesions [11]. Whole body PET/CT was performed in healthy dogs to evaluate the physiologic distribution of FDG in thoracic and abdominal organs, including liver, spleen, adrenal glands and heart muscle [13,18]. These data provide a basis for the interpretation of pathologic changes that can be imaged by using this technique. Increased uptake of FDG could be demonstrated in canine lymphoma [11], canine cutaneous mast cell tumor [9], and in various solid tumors (sarcomas, carcinomas) [15]. In all of these studies, PET seemed to be an efficient and useful tool in canine patients. This non- invasive diagnostic method allowed imaging of physiologic and pathologic processes on a molecular level.

This study was designed by a research cooperation between human and veterinarian institutes with a keen interest in the improvement of diagnostic and therapeutic methods in comparative oncology. The importance of comparative oncology has increased during the last couple of years. Because of genetic and biologic similarities regarding certain tumor types, the dog is particularly well suited as a model for human tumors [20]. Using dogs with spontaneously arising tumors as a model for human tumors offers advantages over the use of transgenic animal models due to the more comparable behavior and biologic properties of the tumors. Therefore, comparative oncology is an important innovative tool that can bridge the gap between basic cancer research and the clinic with benefits for both human and veterinary medicine [21,22]. Results acquired from pet animals with naturally occurring diseases like spontaneous tumors can improve the evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of new cancer therapy options for human and animal patients [23,24].

The aims of this pilot study were to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of whole body FDG PET/CT for staging and restaging in dogs with various tumor types. Furthermore, this study should illustrate the canine patient with spontaneously occurring caner as an animal model for comparative oncology. In addition the study served to establish a basis for further comparative studies at the participating institutions.

Material and Methods

Ethics Statement

All experiments described in this paper were carried out with the approval of, and in accordance with the recommendations laid down by the “Deutsches Tierschutzgesetz”. These guidelines are equivalent to the “Animal Welfare Act”. This study was approved by the Animal Welfare Officer of the Centre of Preclinical Research, Technische Universität München, where the anesthesia and the PET/CT scans of the dogs were performed, in addition to the Government of Upper Bavaria.

Patient Population

Ten dogs aged 8.75 ± 1.9 y and weighing 25.8 ± 11.3 kg were included in the study. Five of the dogs were male (one intact and four neutered) and five female (three intact and two spayed). Breeds included Flat Coated Retriever (n = 2), Golden Retriever (n = 1), Beauceron (n = 1), Standard Schnauzer (n = 1) and mixed breed dogs (n = 5).

Informed owner’s consent was required for all dogs participating in the study. Exclusion criteria were a concurrent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, pregnancy, and an anesthetic risk classification of ASA IV or V. The ASA classification serves to divide the patients into different groups according to their physical state and so enables the risk of narcosis to be assessed. Class I-III describes patients ranging from organically healthy, clinically unremarkable to those with marked organic / clinical alterations. Class IV describes patients with severe organic damage and poor vital functions. Class V means that there is an acute risk to life with severe organic damage. The owners of all dogs were advised to avoid vigorous physical activity for their dogs during 24 hours before the scan to prevent an excessive FDG uptake within the muscle tissue.

In the preliminary assessment, all dogs underwent a physical examination and a one-view thoracic radiograph in right lateral recumbency. Blood samples were taken and complete blood counts as well as a plasma biochemistry profile were performed. The blood glucose level in the canine patients before the scan was 4.85 mmol/l ± 1.3. According to the results of these examinations, the dogs’ anesthetic risks were classified using the ASA classification system. Depending on size and localization of the tumor, samples for cytological or histopa thologic evaluation were taken either by fine needle aspiration, by needle core biopsy or by excisional biopsy.

The patient with the histiocytic sarcoma was the only patient who underwent a PET/CT examination twice. The reason for this was a restaging or monitoring of the effects of medication. The prognosis for a histiocytic sarcoma is very poor with a very high risk of metastasization and relapse. The median survival time is approximately 6 months [25]. There were three months between the first and second scan and already 5 months since the diagnosis was made. This is why we believed that a rescan was indicated as improved staging and as a progress check using PET/CT.

Anesthesia Protocol

Dogs were fasted for at least 12 hours before FDG PET/CT scanning, but had free access to water. After intravenous catheter placement, the dogs were pre- medicated intravenously (IV) with butorphanol (0.2mg/kg) (n = 10) or acepromazine (0.2mg/kg) (n = 1). Both anesthetic agents are known not to influence the blood glucose level negatively [26,27]. The FDG dose was calculated according to the dosing scheme published by the pediatric task group, European Society of Nuclear Medicine [28], (dose rate mean: 225.47 ± 80.02 MBq; 6.09 ± 2.16 Ci) (Table 1). Anesthesia was induced with propofol (4–6 mg/kg) IV; endotracheal intubation was performed, and anesthesia was maintained with constant rate infusion of propofol (4–6 mg/kg/h) IV. All dogs were ventilated with 100% oxygen and were infused with lactated Ringer’s solution (10 ml/kg/h) IV. During anesthesia, heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral O2 saturation, end-tidal CO2-concentration, peak respiration pressure and minute ventilation volume were continuously monitored as well as the animals warmed with a heatingpad.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Patient Characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.t001

PET/CT Acquisition

After induction of anesthesia, dogs were positioned in the scanner in dorsal or ventral recumbency depending on the tumor localization.

FDG PET/CT scans were acquired on a Biograph Sensation 64 PET/CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare). All patients obtained a dedicated CT scan (120 kV, 180 mAs care dose, 0.5 s per rotation, 5-mm slice thickness, portal venous phase 80 s after the injection of 1.5 ml/kg of intravenous iodine containing contrast agent [Imeron 300 mg/ml]). The diagnostic CT scan was acquired for attenuation correction in resting expiratory position. FDG was administered intravenously to all patients 83.7 ± 12.11 minutes before the PET/CT scan. Emission time was 2 min per bed position, with 5–9 bed positions per patient (head to tail). These combined instruments make it possible to perform a PET and CT examination in one and the same scan within one instrument. The two examinations are made one directly after the other. The images are combined with the help of integrated software and a merged image is produced. This technique enables the exposure time to be considerably shortened and the image quality appreciably improved by only having to position the patients once, adding value to the data evaluation process.

Image Analysis

The entire rating procedure was performed on a dedicated workstation using software (Syngo MMWP [workstation] and Syngo TrueD [software]; Siemens Medical Solutions).

CT und PET data were evaluated independently of one another by two specialists. On the other hand, the combined PET/CT was evaluated with the two of them together and the results of the individual CT and PET data combined with the clinical preliminary report.

A 5-point scale was used for the interpretation of the FDG-PET scans, CT scans and combined FDG PET/CT scans according to the following criteria: 1 = definitely benign; 2 = probably benign; 3 = indeterminate; 4 = probably malignant; 5 = definitely malignant. Scores of 1 and 2 were considered as benign lesions, and scores of 4 and 5 were considered as malignant. With a score of 3, a statement regarding the malignancy of the lesions was not possible. Therefore, the CT scans were interpreted subjectively regarding morphology, contrast enhancement, distribution of contrast agent. For interpretation of the PET data, FDG uptake was assessed according to the standardized uptake value (SUV).

The SUV is a semi-quantitative method of determining the uptake of a tracer in a specific tissue by using the following calculation:For further analysis, the maximum SUV was used.

These SUV values as well as the history of each patient were considered for the evaluation of the imaged structures in combined PET/CT and assigning values within the 5-point scale. The aim of this evaluation method was to find out whether the additional PET images provide an advantage in the diagnosis/assessment of anatomic structures.

For the analysis of the PET/CT results of all patients, a total of 89 individual regions were evaluated using a 5-point scale and included abdominal and thoracic organs, regional and peripheral lymph nodes, and salivary glands. The conclusion from this evaluation method was that the additional PET data appreciably simplified the subjective assessment of anatomic structures compared to CT by itself, especially with the abundance of data from a full body scan. Follow-up studies are necessary in order to prove this statistically.

A Region of Interest (ROI) is a subset of an image in which the data points are sampled for analysis. In this study, the ROI was defined as the primary tumor, its draining lymph nodes, any lesions suggestive of metastatic disease, the liver, spleen, thymus, salivary gland, renal cortex, and left ventricular heart muscle. The ROI was placed at a representative, central position of the relevant organ, filling the anatomically predefined shape of the organ as well as possible and the SUV value (min, mean and max) were compiled by drawing the ROI within five successive axial, dorsal, or sagittal slices. In the same way, the ROI was placed on the primary tumors if still present and other conspicuous structures. With the lymph nodes on the other hand, because of the partly smaller size, the ROI was placed centrally using an ellipse and in the same way the min, mean and max values from five successive sections were used for further assessment. Brain, renal pelvis, lower urinary tract, blood vessels, and gall bladder were not included in the evaluation [15].

Whole body images (Fig 1) acquired one hour after FDG injection were reviewed.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Overview of thoracic and abdominal organs in a whole body 18F F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D- glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) in a patient with multicentric lymphoma.

(A) Coronal contrast enhanced CT; (B) Coronal 18F-FDG PET/CT. Overview of the thoracic and abdominal organs of a dog with a multicentric lymphoma. The mean SUVs of these organs are defined in Table 4. The labeled organs are normal with physiological FDG-uptake (see Table 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.g001

Results

Patient characteristics and any treatment given prior to the FDG PET/CT are shown in Table 1. The treatment protocol was changed significantly in seven out of ten dogs due to the results of FDG PET/CT. The resulting therapy after FDG PET/CT and the clinical follow up six months later is shown in Table 2. Presumed areas of malignancy and other structures with increased FDG uptake were found and involved in further data analysis (Table 3). Table 3 shows the regions with increased FDG uptake and the cytologic or histologic findings in these regions. In addition, in every patient, the SUV values of selected organs, the main target areas of metastases (lung, liver and spleen), and the lymph nodes as well as the primary tumors were measured individually (Table 4). These SUVs are in accordance with previously published FDG PET/CT data in dogs [9,13,15]. Furthermore the SUV in the primary tumors was increased compared to the physiologic thoracic and abdominal organs (Table 4). As a rule, malignant tumors exhibit an increased SUV value, a cutoff value of >2.5 being described [29]. However, an increased SUV does not represent a diagnosis and certainly does not make any further elucidation unnecessary. An increased SUV value is an indication of a malignant tumor, but an inflammatory process must always be taken into consideration as a differential diagnosis [30].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Findings of PET/CT, resulting therapeutic decisions and clinical follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.t002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Mean and Max SUVs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.t003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. SUV max values in organs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.t004

Table 4 is intended to show that in our study, the primary tumors exhibit an increased SUV value compared to physiologic tissue and so can be used as a criterion of malignancy.

In 9 of 10 dogs in this study that underwent FDG PET/CT while a primary tumor was present, a distinctly increased FDG uptake within the primary tumor could be measured.

The only tumor lacking increased FDG uptake was the grade I cutaneous mast cell tumor in one of the dogs presented with an additional mammary carcinoma. This patient first presented with a mammary carcinoma. In the clinical pre-examination for the PET/CT examination, a mass with the diameter of approximately 0.5 cm could be clearly palpated which however did not show increased FDG uptake. Nevertheless, the mass was investigated cytologically before the surgical removal of the mammary tumor and was found to be a mast cell tumor. In the subsequent operation, both the mammary tumor and the mast cell tumor were surgically removed.

There were a few unexpected findings in one of the dogs. The patient with the previously resected sertoli cell tumor showed markedly increased FDG uptake in both salivary glands. The same dog showed a diffusely increased cutaneous FDG uptake despite the fact that at the time the FDG PET/CT was performed, the dog did not show any obvious skin changes on physical examination. Histopathologic examination of the skin revealed a telogene effluvium. Telogen effluvium is a scalp disorder characterized by the thinning or shedding of hair resulting from the early entry of hair in the telogen phase (the resting phase of the hair follicle). Emotional or physiological stress may result in an alteration of the normal hair cycle and cause the disorder. Telogen hair follicles in the dermis can be associated with an inflammation [31]. However, this result was not to be connected with the sertoli cell tumor.

No complications such as an anesthesiological incident or an anaphylactic reaction occurred during FDG PET/CT and all dogs could be discharged three hours after the examination according to the radiation protection ordinance (< 14kBq).

Discussion

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of FDG PET/CT in dogs as well as the efficacy of whole body FDG PET/CT for staging in a case series of 10 dogs with various tumor types with a perspective for further consecutive comparative studies. Furthermore, drawing interest in dogs as a well- suited animal model for comparative oncology was another aim of this study.

Due to a lack of published data for FDG PET/CT imaging in dogs with sertoli cell tumor, GIST or Basalioma as well as in hypermetabolic salivary gland no direct comparison with other studies could be made. For this reason, results deriving from human medicine regarding the detectability of the mentioned tumors as well as others in FDG PET/CT had to be used.

Only the patient with the sertoli cell tumor showed markedly increased FDG uptake in both salivary glands. An association of these findings with the sertoli cell tumor was considered very unlikely. Furthermore a human study concluded that a differentiation between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors is not possible by FDG PET/CT based on an increased FDG uptake [32]. Therefore, these findings were not included in further treatment decisions for the dog.

Up to now an increased FDG uptake has been described only in grade II and grade III canine mast cell tumors [9]. In this study the only tumor lacking increased FDG uptake was a grade I cutaneous mast cell tumor. Grade I mast cell tumors have not been evaluated by FDG PET/CT beforehand, therefore it cannot be excluded that the metabolic activity of grade I tumors may be too low to cause an increased FDG uptake. It is also possible that the grade I mast cell tumor was too small to be detectable by CT or PET.

In the present study, FDG PET/CT was a particularly promising imaging method in patients with lymphoma (n = 2) (Fig 2), mammary carcinoma (n = 4) (Fig 3), and primary lung tumor (n = 1). In these patients the results of FDG PET/CT had a major impact on treatment recommendation. The two dogs with lymphoma were initially considered to suffer from a locally confined tumor. In both patients a systemic involvement could be demonstrated by FDG PET/CT. Systemic chemotherapy might have resulted in improved survival times in these patients but it was declined by the owners. In human medicine, FDG PET/CT is already widely used as a non-invasive method for staging and control of response to treatment in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [33–36]. In veterinary patients, this method proved to be highly sensitive [9,11,19]. In this study, PET/CT resulted in a significant change in the prognosis and in therapeutic recommendations for the lymphoma patients and is expected to be particularly beneficial in these patients to exclude or to detect systemic disease. For further studies it would be interesting to use 3`-deoxy-3`-[18F]fluoro-thymidine (FLT) tracer instead of FDG as it showed a higher sensitivity in detecting lymphoma in different species [19,37,38].

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. 18F-FDG uptake in a patient with multicentric lymphoma.

(A) Coronal contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT); (B) Coronal 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D- glucose (18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT) Increased FDG uptake in both retropharyngales lymph nodes (standardized uptake value (SUV) mean 2.37 and 2.43 ± 2.4) as well as intramuscular increased FDG-uptake (SUV mean 3.04 ± 1.25).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. 18F F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) uptake in a patient with mammary carcinoma and multiple metastases.

(A) Axial contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT); (B) Axial 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT Increased FDG uptake in the primary tumor (SUV mean 6.92 ± 1.06), histologically a mammary carcinoma on the mammary gland; hepatomegaly; mass within the spleen with increased 18F- FDG uptake (SUV mean 2.91 ± 0.31).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.g003

In dogs with mammary carcinoma, FDG PET/CT was very helpful for evaluation of regional lymph nodes in order to confirm or exclude metastatic disease (Fig 4). The exact evaluation of lymph nodes for metastases before surgery is beneficial for accurate planning of a minimally invasive surgical procedure. Combined PET/CT has proven to provide considerably more information on whether lymph node metastases are present or absent compared to CT imaging alone [39,40]. The results of our study are consistent with this statement. We wanted to show with our study that the analysis of CT data can be simplified greatly with the aid of PET. Tracheobronchial lymph nodes and abdominal abdominal lymph nodes, in particular, are visualized more clearly by combined PET/CT than CT alone. This facilitates the evaluation of possible pathological findings at these locations. Abnormalities of internal organs are also better visualized with PET, making it easier to evaluate changes here as well. (Fig 3).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. 18F F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) uptake in a patient with mammary carcinoma and multiple metastases.

(A) Coronal contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT); (B) Coronal 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT Increased FDG uptake in both lnn. axillares (SUV mean 2.67 ± 0.77) as well as in a subcutaneous mass (the more caudally located structure) (SUV mean 4.37 ± 0.82).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800.g004

In addition, FDG and FLT PET/CT were described in a dog with a primary bronchial adenocarcinoma [8]. In that case report, the dog was evaluated with PET/CT before and after treatment. Both FDG and FLT PET/CT tracers were found to be effective in differentiating tumor tissue from physiologic or reactive tissue. In the present study, FDG PET/CT was also used in a dog with a primary pulmonary tumor. On PET/CT, pulmonary metastatic disease was found, whereas no increased FDG uptake could be demonstrated within the locally draining lymph nodes. In human as well as in veterinary medicine the staging, especially the mediastinal nodal staging, is the most important prognostic factor concerning the median survival time in patients with primary pulmonary carcinoma [41–43]. This finding led to the decision against surgical treatment (e.g. lung lobectomy) despite the lack of mediastinal lymph node metastases. The relatively low FDG uptake in the metastatic lung lesion (SUV max 1.02 ± 0.16) compared to the primary tumor (SUV max 9.40 ± 1.28) is characteristic for human lung cancer [44]. Even though PET/CT is more accurate in detecting metastases compared to CT alone [45], false- positive findings in PET/CT have to be considered [46]. In this study, the lung lesion (left pulmonary lobe, pars cranialis, dorsally, marginally, about 0.6mm diameter) could be confirmed by X-rays during restaging six months later which proved the PET/CT findings.

In dogs with histiocytic sarcoma (n = 1), sertoli cell tumor (n = 1) and GIST (n = 1), FDG PET/CT showed no indications of metastases although the histologic findings as well as the biologic behavior of the tumor predicted a poor prognosis. Therefore, the follow up treatment was not changed. In human patients with GIST, FDG PET/CT is already widely used for non-invasive staging. A correlation between the degree of malignancy and the intensity of FDG uptake has been demonstrated, so FDG PET/CT provides important prognostic information in this tumor type. FDG PET/CT has also proven to be helpful for evaluation of the response to treatment and early recognition of tumor recurrence in patients with GIST [47–49]. However, FDG uptake in human GISTs was reported to vary widely [50]. Negative, low, or intensive FDG uptake can occur. In the present study, FDG PET/CT was performed in the patient after surgical resection of a GIST. Therefore, a comparison with pre-treatment values was not possible, nor was evaluation of the primary tumor possible.

In human medicine, there are only a small number of reports on FDG PET/CT in patients with a Sertoli cell tumor [51] or histiocytic sarcoma. Increased uptake was reported to be measured in the mass themselves as well as in metastatic lymph nodes [52]. In addition there is one case report with a FDG PET in a canine intracranial histiocytic sarcoma [16]. These case reports indicate that FDG PET/CT might be valuable for early detection and staging of testicular tumors and histiocytic sarcoma in human as well as in veterinary medicine.

These cases should illustrate the possible consequences of staging by FDG PET/CT in canine patients as well as the comparable and transferable results in human and veterinarian patients with spontaneously occurring cancer.

Limitations of the study are the small number of patients that precluded statistical evaluation of the results and the heterogeneous patient population including various tumor types and dogs with and without prior treatment of their tumors which precluded a direct comparison with other imaging methods for staging. Some dogs underwent surgical resection of their primary tumor before FDG PET/CT. In these cases, FDG PET/CT evaluation of the primary tumor was not possible. In patients with incompletely resected primary tumors, the FDG uptake at the site of surgery might have been compromised by physiologic postoperative local reactions.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of this pilot study indicate that FDG PET/CT in dogs with previously described malignancies can be a promising technique for the staging of dogs with specific cancers and a very useful tool for individual adaptation of treatment and prognosis. The interpretation and evaluation of the FDG PET/CT values shows similar advantages and restraints as in human patients. Thus, it appears to be plausible for the canine tumor patient to be able to serve as a model for diagnostic and therapeutic studies of human cancer in the future. However, clinical signs of the patient as well as the biologic behavior of various tumor types have to be considered when interpreting the data obtained by FDG PET/CT. This is required for correct interpretation of increased FDG uptake and for establishing a correlation with an underlying disease process. Further studies to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of this method as well as the differentiation of more specific tracers for oncologic PET/CT in dogs are necessary. Although the imaging with FDG PET/CT is not a new method in human medicine, this study should draw interest to dogs as an animal model for further comparative studies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Korbinian Pieper for this clinical encouragement. As well as we thank Coletta Kruschke and Stefanie Wurster for their excellent technical and medical assistance. Equally, we thank Wolfgang Götschel for image editing. Finally, we thank all the patient owners who participated in the study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CB JH MCW AML MS. Performed the experiments: SS NK JB AKvT EF. Analyzed the data: AJB AB SS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EF CB JB AKvT JH MS. Wrote the paper: SS SL AJB JB CB.

Citation: Seiler SMF, Baumgartner C, Hirschberger J, Beer AJ, Brühschwein A, Kreutzmann N, et al. (2015) Comparative Oncology: Evaluation of 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Staging of Dogs with Malignant Tumors. PLoS ONE 10(6): e0127800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127800

References

1. Adams VJ, Evans KM, Sampson J, Wood JL (2010) Methods and mortality results of a health survey of purebred dogs in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 51: 512–524. pmid:21029096

2. Weber WA, Avril N, Schwaiger M (1999) Relevance of positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 175: 356–373. pmid:10481766

3. Weber WA, Schwaiger M, Avril N (2000) Quantitative assessment of tumor metabolism using FDG-PET imaging. Nucl Med Biol 27: 683–687. pmid:11091112

4. Bomanji JB, Costa DC, Ell PJ (2001) Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. Lancet Oncol 2: 157–164. pmid:11902566

5. Eubank WB, Mankoff DA, Schmiedl UP, Winter TC 3rd, Fisher ER, Ohlsen AB, et al. (1998) Imaging of oncologic patients: benefit of combined CT and FDG PET in the diagnosis of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171: 1103–1110. pmid:9763005

6. Blodgett TM, Meltzer CC, Townsend DW (2007) PET/CT: form and function. Radiology 242: 360–385. pmid:17255408

7. Leblanc AK, Miller AN, Galyon GD, Moyers TD, Long MJ, Stuckey AC, et al. (2012) Preliminary evaluation of serial (18) FDG-PET/CT to assess response to toceranib phosphate therapy in canine cancer. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 53: 348–357. pmid:22360684

8. Ballegeer EA, Forrest LJ, Jeraj R, Mackie TR, Nickles RJ (2006) PET/CT following intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary lung tumor in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 47: 228–233. pmid:16553158

9. LeBlanc AK, Jakoby BW, Townsend DW, Daniel GB (2009) 18FDG-PET imaging in canine lymphoma and cutaneous mast cell tumor. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50: 215–223. pmid:19400472

10. LeBlanc AK, Wall JS, Morandi F, Kennel SJ, Stuckey A, Jacobi B, et al. (2009) Normal thoracic and abdominal distribution of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18FDG) in adult cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50: 436–441. pmid:19697611

11. Larson SM, Weiden PL, Grunbaum Z, Kaplan HG, Rasey JS, Graham MM, et al. (1981) Positron imaging feasibility studies. II: Characteristics of 2-deoxyglucose uptake in rodent and canine neoplasms: concise communication. J Nucl Med 22: 875–879. pmid:6974768

12. Stroup SP, Kane CJ, Farchshchi-Heydari S, James CM, Davis CH, Wallace AM, et al. (2012) Preoperative sentinel lymph node mapping of the prostate using PET/CT fusion imaging and Ga-68-labeled tilmanocept in an animal model. Clin Exp Metastasis 29: 673–680. pmid:22714690

13. Lee MS, Lee AR, Jung MA, Lee IH, Choi JH, Chung HW, et al. (2010) Characterization of physiologic 18F-FDG uptake with PET-CT in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 51: 670–673. pmid:21158245

14. Hansen AE, Kristensen AT, Law I, McEvoy FJ, Kjaer A, Engelholm SA (2012) Multimodality functional imaging of spontaneous canine tumors using 64Cu-ATSM and 18FDG PET/CT and dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion CT. Radiother Oncol 102: 424–428. pmid:22119225

15. Hansen AE, McEvoy F, Engelholm SA, Law I, Kristensen AT (2011) FDG PET/CT imaging in canine cancer patients. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 52: 201–206. pmid:21388475

16. Kang BT, Park C, Yoo JH, Gu SH, Jang DP, Kim YB, et al. (2009) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings of primary intracranial histiocytic sarcoma in a dog. J Vet Med Sci 71: 1397–1401. pmid:19887750

17. Page RL, Garg PK, Garg S, Archer GE, Bruland OS, Zalkutsky MR (1994) PET imaging of osteosarcoma in dogs using a fluorine-18-labeled monoclonal antibody Fab fragment. J Nucl Med 35: 1506–1513. pmid:8071702

18. LeBanc AK, Jakoby B, Townsend DW, Daniel GB (2008) Thoracic and abdominal organ uptake of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (18FDG) with positron emission tomography in the normal dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 49: 182–188. pmid:18419002

19. Lawrence J, Vanderhoek M, Barbee D, Jeraj R, Tumas DB, Vail DM (2009) Use of 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine PET/CT for evaluating response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in dogs with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 50: 660–668. pmid:19999354

20. Khanna C, Lindblad-Toh K, Vail D, London C, Bergman P, Barber L, et al. (2006) The dog as a cancer model. Nat Biotechnol 24: 1065–1066. pmid:16964205

21. Paoloni M, Khanna C (2008) Translation of new cancer treatments from pet dogs to humans. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 147–156. pmid:18202698

22. Lindblad-Toh K, Wade CM, Mikkelsen TS, Karlsson EK, Jaffe DB, Kamal M, et al. (2005) Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438: 803–819. pmid:16341006

23. Vail DM, MacEwen EG (2000) Spontaneously occurring tumors of companion animals as models for human cancer. Cancer Invest 18: 781–792. pmid:11107448

24. Hansen K, Khanna C (2004) Spontaneous and genetically engineered animal models; use in preclinical cancer drug development. Eur J Cancer 40: 858–880. pmid:15120042

25. Craig LE, Julian ME, Ferracone JD (2002) The diagnosis and prognosis of synovial tumors in dogs: 35 cases. Vet Pathol 39: 66–73. pmid:12102220

26. Trim CM (1983) Cardiopulmonary effects of butorphanol tartrate in dogs. Am J Vet Res 44: 329–331. pmid:6830022

27. Ionut V, Kirkman EL, Bergman RN (2004) Investigation of the effect of acepromazine on intravenous glucose tolerance tests in dogs. Am J Vet Res 65: 1124–1127. pmid:15334847

28. Piepsz A, Hahn K, Roca I, Ciofetta G, Toth G, Gordon I, et al. (1990) A radiopharmaceuticals schedule for imaging in paediatrics. Paediatric Task Group European Association Nuclear Medicine. Eur J Nucl Med 17: 127–129. pmid:2279492

29. Raj P, Kaman L, Singh R, Dahyia D, Bhattacharya A, Bal A (2013) Sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET-CT scan in detecting lymph node metastasis in operable periampullary tumours in correlation with the final histopathology after curative surgery. Updates Surg 65: 103–107. pmid:23504604

30. Akgul AG, Liman ST, Topcu S, Yuksel M (2014) False positive PET scan deserves attention. J BUON 19: 836–841. pmid:25261676

31. Rashid RM (2013) Analysis of clinical and histologic correlations in alopecia areata and telogen effluvium: adversities in alopecia pattern mimicry. Cutis 91: 141–144. pmid:23617085

32. Toriihara A, Nakamura S, Kubota K, Makino T, Okochi K, Shibuya H (2013) Can dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT differentiate malignant salivary gland tumors from benign tumors? AJR Am J Roentgenol 201: 639–644. pmid:23971458

33. Hutchings M, Loft A, Hansen M, Pedersen LM, Berthelsen AK, Keiding S, et al. (2006) Position emission tomography with or without computed tomography in the primary staging of Hodgkin's lymphoma. Haematologica 91: 482–489. pmid:16585015

34. Bangerter M, Moog F, Buchmann I, Kotzerke J, Griesshammer M, Hafner M, et al. (1998) Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin's disease. Ann Oncol 9: 1117–1122. pmid:9834825

35. Munker R, Glass J, Griffeth LK, Sattar T, Zamani R, Heldmann M, et al. (2004) Contribution of PET imaging to the initial staging and prognosis of patients with Hodgkin's disease. Ann Oncol 15: 1699–1704. pmid:15520074

36. Bednaruk-Mlynski E, Pienkowska J, Skorzak A, Malkowski B, Kulikowski W, Subocz E, et al. (2015) Comparison of positron emission tomography/computed tomography with classical contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the initial staging of Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 56: 377–382. pmid:24794802

37. Herrmann K, Wieder HA, Buck AK, Schoffel M, Krause BJ, Fend F, et al. (2007) Early response assessment using 3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 13: 3552–3558. pmid:17575218

38. Wagner M, Seitz U, Buck A, Neumaier B, Schultheiss S, Bangerter M, et al. (2003) 3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine ([18F]-FLT) as positron emission tomography tracer for imaging proliferation in a murine B-Cell lymphoma model and in the human disease. Cancer Res 63: 2681–2687. pmid:12750297

39. Bombardieri E, Crippa F (2001) PET imaging in breast cancer. Q J Nucl Med 45: 245–256. pmid:11788817

40. Song BI, Lee SW, Jeong SY, Chae YS, Lee WK, Ahn BC, et al. (2012) 18F-FDG uptake by metastatic axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment PET/CT as a prognostic factor for recurrence in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer. J Nucl Med 53: 1337–1344. pmid:22870824

41. De Leyn P, Lardinois D, Van Schil PE, Rami-Porta R, Passlick B, Zielinski M, et al. (2007) ESTS guidelines for preoperative lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32: 1–8. pmid:17448671

42. McNiel EA, Ogilvie GK, Powers BE, Hutchison JM, Salman MD, Withrow SJ, et al. (1997) Evaluation of prognostic factors for dogs with primary lung tumors: 67 cases (1985–1992). J Am Vet Med Assoc 211: 1422–1427. pmid:9394893

43. Ogilvie GK, Haschek WM, Withrow SJ, Richardson RC, Harvey HJ, Henderson RA, et al. (1989) Classification of primary lung tumors in dogs: 210 cases (1975–1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc 195: 106–108. pmid:2547742

44. Rauscher I, Eiber M, Furst S, Souvatzoglou M, Nekolla SG, Ziegler SI, et al. (2014) PET/MR imaging in the detection and characterization of pulmonary lesions: technical and diagnostic evaluation in comparison to PET/CT. J Nucl Med 55: 724–729. pmid:24652827

45. Toloza EM, Harpole L, McCrory DC (2003) Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. Chest 123: 137S–146S. pmid:12527573

46. Roberts PF, Follette DM, von Haag D, Park JA, Valk PE, Pound TR, et al. (2000) Factors associated with false-positive staging of lung cancer by positron emission tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 70: 1154–1159; discussion 1159–1160. pmid:11081861

47. Valls-Ferrusola E, Garcia-Garzon JR, Ponce-Lopez A, Soler-Peter M, Fuertes-Cabero S, Moragas-Solanes M, et al. (2012) Patterns of extension of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) treated with imatinib (Gleevec(R)) by 18F-FDG PET/CT. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 104: 360–366. pmid:22849497

48. Park JW, Cho CH, Jeong DS, Chae HD (2011) Role of F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Gastric GIST: Predicting Malignant Potential Pre-operatively. J Gastric Cancer 11: 173–179. pmid:22076223

49. Gayed I, Vu T, Iyer R, Johnson M, Macapinlac H, Swanston N, et al. (2004) The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med 45: 17–21. pmid:14734662

50. Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Mochiki E, Asao T, Kuwano H, et al. (2005) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: useful technique for predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Surg 29: 1429–1435. pmid:16222452

51. Ozulker T, Ozpacaci T, Ozulker F, Ozekici U, Bilgic R, Mert M (2010) Incidental detection of Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor by FDG PET/CT imaging in a patient with androgen insensitivity syndrome. Ann Nucl Med 24: 35–39. pmid:19957213

52. Makis W, Ciarallo A, Derbekyan V, Lisbona R (2011) Histiocytic sarcoma involving lymph nodes: imaging appearance on gallium-67 and F-18 FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 36: e37–38. pmid:21552013