Article info
Article Type:
Original Research
Article History:
Received: 22 Jan 2015
Accepted: 6 May 2015
ePublished: 4 July 2015
Keywords:
Morning report, Effectiveness, Interns, Externs
Abstract
Introduction: Morning report is an important teaching method for interns and externs. Achieving the objectives of morning report affects future performance. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of morning reports.
Methods: Viewpoints of 85 interns and externs at the cardiology wards of teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in the academic year of 2012-2013 were investigated. The instrument for data collection was a researcher-made questionnaire. Data were analyzed by chi-square and independent t-test. Effectiveness was defined as the rate of the achievement of the goals of morning reports based on dividing the total score of the questionnaire (54 scores) into three parts of 0-17 (poor effectiveness), 18-36 (moderate effectiveness) and 37-54 (good effectiveness).
Results: The effectiveness of morning report sessions without the presence of residents was reported as moderate in hospital A, and the effectiveness of morning report sessions with the presence of residents in hospital B was reported as moderate in the opinion of interns and poor in the view of externs. There was no significant difference between the viewpoints of interns in hospitals A and B with regard to the effectiveness of morning report sessions (p=0.169).
Conclusion: Results indicate that the higher academic level of subjects discussed in morning reports with presence of residents caused a reduction in the participation rate of interns and externs, thereby decreasing their learning and satisfaction. However, without the presence of residents, the students' feelings of fear and anxiety were reduced and their satisfaction was heightened.
Introduction
Morning report is a conference that is run with the attendance of clinical teachers and students; the team responsible for the night shift reports the clinical issues of several inpatients during this shift and the participants discuss how to properly manage these patients.1 Morning reports, along with clinical rounds and outpatient training, are common and valuable methods in clinical education. The main objectives of morning reports are teaching the application of evidence in the process of diagnosis and treatment of patients, promotion of problem solving skills and improvement of oral presentation and discussion in students.2 Other objectives of morning report include assessment of knowledge, attitude and performance of students, identification of medical errors, exchange of information during shift change and increasing social investment within the medical team.3 Regular and active attendance in all theoretical or practical courses and instructional sessions, including morning report sessions, is one of the main duties of interns and externs, cited in the regulations concerning the duties of students of general medicine.4 In the project designed to determine the criteria and indices of clinical education in teaching hospitals and centers in 2009, externs were responsible for presentation of patients in 3% of cases, and attendance of externs in morning report sessions was mandatory in 90% of cases.2 However, although interns and externs are the main audience in morning report sessions, the satisfaction and use of their abilities have not yet been examined.
Analyzing the studies carried out in this regard, it can be argued that, although interns and externs are the regular audience of morning report sessions, in sessions in which residents of different levels attend the academic level of sessions is high and most of the discussions are compatible with the educational level of this group, and interns and externs, in particular, benefit very little.5-8 As an example, in the study carried out by Haghdoost, the minimum role of students and interns was reported to be modified.9 Afshari also reported that the teachers' ideas about morning report sessions were not compatible with those of students at different levels.10 Despite running specialty and subspecialty programs for the residents, lack of morning report sessions for residents and simultaneous attendance of residents, interns and externs creates a greater gap between different academic levels and makes morning report sessions less applicable for the entire audience. Every attempt made to promote education should be supported and reinforced. Given the significance and status of morning reports for medical students' education, the first step to be taken to enhance the quality of this educational method is analysis of its various dimensions.11
In the cardiology ward of hospital A, morning report sessions were held for the interns and externs without the presence of residents. They believed that, owing to accepting the responsibility of morning reports independent of residents, their accuracy in clinical issues and patients was increased and, as a result, students more precisely considered patient-oriented education from the very beginning of education. In the cardiology ward of hospital B, however, as usual, morning report sessions were held with attendance of residents, interns and externs.
Having searched various sources, no morning report sessions were found to be the same as those of hospital A. Thus, the present study was aimed to compare two methods of running morning report sessions, possibly to provide more evidence about the applicability of morning reports for all the audience and to achieve the intended objectives, some of which were discussed in previous studies.12
The present research was carried out to determine the effectiveness of two types of morning report sessions based on the opinions of interns and externs and to introduce a pattern to run morning report sessions according to the instructional considerations of Iranian universities of medical sciences.
Materials and Methods
This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology wards of two teaching hospital of Mashhad University of Medical Science in the academic year 2012-2013. The statistical populations included the interns and externs that attended the morning report sessions at the cardiology wards of these hospitals. The participants qualified for inclusion in the study were the interns and externs who were passing the cardiology ward program and had participated in at least two morning report sessions. The exclusion criteria from the study included guest and transferred interns and externs (due to possible effects of conditions on responses), incomplete response to questionnaires and lack of tendency to cooperate and complete the questionnaires. The required sample consisted of 46 interns and 40 externs. Using a census technique, all the qualified participants who had attended morning report sessions were included in the study. Before the start of the sessions, the researcher attended where the morning report sessions were held in each hospital, distributed the questionnaires among the interns and externs who tended to participate in the study and collected the questionnaires at the end of the morning report sessions. The instrument for data collection included a researcher-made questionnaire that consisted of three sections. The first section was about educational objectives that included 9 items and was rated based on a Likert scale from 0 to 3 (0=completely disagree, 1=relatively disagree, 2=relatively agree, 3= completely agree). The second section included medical capabilities and consisted of 22 items, with a score of 0 for lack of selection and score of 1 for selection of each item. The third section was comprised of educational capabilities and included 8 items, with a score of 0 for lack of selection and a score of 1 for selection of each item. The total score of the questionnaire was 54. The scores <18, 18-36 and >36 were classified as poor effectiveness, moderate effectiveness and good effectiveness, respectively.
The content and face validity indices of the questionnaire were confirmed according to the expert views of authorities of medical education and morning report, and the reliability of the given questionnaire was approved through test-retest method (r=0.129).
For the sake of ethical considerations, the questionnaires were completed anonymously and the participants were ensured about the confidentiality of the collected data. The data collected about the hospitals were confidentially filed and the names of hospitals were coded in the present study. Data were analyzed by SPSS-16 software and descriptive and inferential statistics such as chi-square and independent t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Ethical Considerations
This paper is based on a M.Sc. dissertation in medical education, the ethical approval has been obtained by the Research Committee of Medical School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (No: 536A).
Results
This study involved 45 interns, 27 (60%) interns from hospital A and 18 (40%) interns from hospital B, and 40 externs, 18 (45%) externs from hospital A and 22 (55%) externs from hospital B. Table 1 shows the effectiveness of morning report sessions.
The results of chi-square test indicated no significant difference between the views of interns of hospitals A and B concerning the effectiveness of morning report sessions (p=0.169). However, there was a significant difference between the opinions of externs in hospitals A and B (p=0.000). Also, there was a significant difference between the total score of interns and externs in hospital A (morning report without the presence of residents) (p=0.000). Moreover, no significant difference was reported between the total score of interns and externs in hospital B (morning report with the presence of residents) (p=0.531). Table 2 depicts a comparison of the viewpoints of interns and externs of the cardiology wards at teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences regarding achievement of educational objectives in the morning report sessions.
Table 3 compares the viewpoints of interns and externs of the cardiology wards at teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences about their medical capabilities by attending morning report sessions.
In table 4 we compare the viewpoints of interns and externs of the cardiology wards at teaching hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences about promotion of their medical abilities by attending morning report sessions.
Discussion
According to Creemers and Scheerens, effectiveness refers to goal attainment, and the attainment of educational goals is considered the central concept of educational effectiveness. They also note that educational goals were the basis for the choice of output criteria in empirical educational effectiveness research.13 However, based on the literature, no study has been reported on this topic to compare the obtained results. According to the opinion of interns and externs of the cardiology ward in hospital A, the effectiveness of morning report sessions without the presence of residents was reported to be moderate, and in the opinion of interns of the cardiology ward in hospital B, the effectiveness of morning report sessions with attendance of residents was moderate. However, based on the views of externs in hospital B, the effectiveness of morning report sessions with the presence of residents was reported to be poor.
Achievement of educational objectives and promotion of medical and educational capabilities of interns attending morning report sessions without the presence of residents in hospital A were reported to be higher than those of the interns attending morning report sessions with the presence of residents in hospital B. However, the general effectiveness of both morning report sessions was moderate in the opinion of interns, and the interns of both hospitals had a rather similar viewpoint about the effectiveness of morning report sessions with and without the presence of residents. The similar opinion of interns attending morning report sessions with and without the presence of residents can be the result of the lower academic gap between interns and residents than between externs and residents, as well as easier adaptability of interns with the subjects presented by residents in morning report sessions, which resulted in more involvement in learning the issues related to patients.
Therefore, participation in morning report sessions with or without the presence of residents did not make a significant difference to them. Of course, the manner of holding morning report sessions affects the opinion of interns about the effectiveness of morning report sessions, and their opinion may change by enhancing the quality of morning report sessions without the presence of residents. The externs of hospitals A and B expressed different views about the effectiveness of morning report sessions with and without the presence of residents. They reported a higher effectiveness of morning report sessions for externs without the presence of residents. Given the lower academic level of externs and higher level of the subjects discussed in morning report sessions with the presence of residents, the participation rate of externs was low and they did not have much responsibility. This, in turn, caused a reduction in students' learning, followed by their dissatisfaction. However, in the morning report sessions without the presence of residents, lack of residents' presence at different levels left the special subjects that externs had not much information about undiscussed, and made the content of morning report sessions more compatible with the courses that externs had passed. Therefore, the feeling of fear and anxiety of the students, who are the main audience of these sessions, was reduced and their satisfaction was enhanced. There was a dramatic disagreement among the interns and externs over the effectiveness of morning report sessions without the presence of residents in hospital A. The externs showed they achieved more educational objectives in the morning reports than interns, and their medical and educational capabilities were more enhanced than interns. There was no significant difference between the views of interns and externs attending morning report sessions with the presence of residents in hospital B, because there was not much opportunity for their participation and learning; however, the effectiveness of these sessions for externs was less than that of interns. The low tendency to complete the questionnaire due to the time-consuming nature of the questionnaire for respondents was one of the limitations of the present study, which was overcome by making a clear and concise questionnaire with high validity and reliability, ease of completion and short time to complete.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Azizi F. Education of Medical Science: Challenges and Visions. First ed . Tehran: The vice chancellor for Student and Educational affairs Ministry of Health and Medical Education;2001.[In Persian].
2. Yazdani SH. Determination of scales and indicators of clinical education in educational centers and hospitals. Report of Vision of Health Departments Institutes. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education;2009.[In Persian].
3. James MT, Mintz MJ, McLaughlin K. Evaluation of a multifaceted "resident-as-teacher" educational intervention to improve morning report. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:20.
4. Curriculum of Medicine, Guidelines for duties of interns [Internet]. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2013. Available from: http://www.tums.com
5. Razavi SM , Shahbaz Ghazvini S, Dabiran S. Students' Benefit Rate from Morning Report Sessions and Its Related Factors in Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2012;11(7):798-806. [In Persian].
6. Trachtman H. Morning report: is the time ripe for a change? Teach Learn Med 2012;24(2):163-4. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.664978
7. Zare s, Behnamfar Z, Behnamfar Z, Mirjalili MR. Quality of Morning Report at Yazd Shahid Sadoughi Teaching Hospital in 1386. Journal of Medical Education and development 2008;2(2):56-60. [In Persian].
8. Moharari RS, Soleymani HA, Nejati A, Rezaeefar A, Khashayar P, Meysamie AP. Evaluation of morning report in an emergency medicine department. Emerg Med J 2010;27(1):32-6. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.067256
9. Haghdoost AA, Jalili Z, Asadi karam E. Morning reports in training hospitals affiliated to Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2006. Journal of Strides in Development of Medical Education 2006;2(2):88-94. [In Persian].
10. Asadi SN, Afshari R, Rajabi Mashhadi MT. A survey on level of awareness and attitude of members of faculty and students to morning report in education hospitals of Mashhad University of Medical Science. Ofogh Medical Education Journal 2009;2(4):6-13. [In Persian]. Available from: http://www.mums.ac.ir/shares/education/assadir1/ research/ecndofo.pdf
11. Padash l, Sanagoo A, Jooibary L. standard setting of morning report in Golestan university of medical science: international congress on implementation of WFME standards in Curricula of Under graduate Medical Education. Iran: kish island;2007. [In Persian].
12. Gross CP, Donnelly GB, Reisman AB, Sepkowitz KA, Callahan MA. Resident Expectations of Morning Report. Arch Intern Med 1999;159(16):1910-4.
13. Bosker RJ, Creemers PM, Scheerens J. Developments in the educational effectiveness research program International Journal of Educational Research 1994;21(2):125-140.
Abbas Makarem1, Alireza Abdollahi Moghadam2, Ali Emadzadeh3, Muhammad Taghi Shakeri4, Yadolah Zarezadeh5,6, Farzaneh Gharibi Kanipan6*
1 Department of Medical Education, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2 Department of Cardiology, Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3 Department of Medical Education, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4 Department of Biostatistics, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5 Research Center for Social Determinants of Health, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
6 Medical Education Development Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
*Corresponding authors: Farzaneh Gharibi Kanipan, Email:[email protected]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2015