Najmieh Saadati 1 and Farideh Moramezi 1 and Maria Cheraghi 2 and Laila Sokhray 1
Academic Editor:Tamas Zakar
1, Fertility, Infertility and Perinatology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
2, Social Determinant of Health Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Received 18 July 2014; Revised 26 September 2014; Accepted 10 October 2014; 23 October 2014
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
Giving birth is one of the most amazing physiologic events in human life and it can be safe and pleasant in many circumstances, but in some situations it might end with known difficulties and complications for mother and her fetus. Preterm labor is one of these complications. It means regular uterine contractions with adequate frequency and intensity resulting in giving birth before 37 completed weeks of pregnancy. Preterm birth is the major reason of the neonatal death and it is responsible for about one third of neonatal mortality in the world [1, 2]. WHO publication mentions that each year more than 1 million babies die from complication of preterm delivery and the annual numbers of premature newborns are about 15 millions and this number is rising each year [3].
Based on WHO publications, UN Millennium Development Goal 4 is reduction of children mortality in two-thirds till 2015 by special attention to neonatal deaths in countries where the neonatal mortality is higher than other places. A great number of the global neonatal deaths happen in Asia [4].
Finding the ways to prevention of preterm birth is a very important issue for health care providers. There are a lot of modalities to achieve this goal but none of them has been introduced as the best way and the role of different methods in preventing preterm labor varies in different places.
Tocolytics are agents that can stop the uterine contraction. Magnesium sulphate (MgSO4 ) as the major tocolytic agent has been used by many medical centers as the first line therapy to inhibition of preterm labor. However, women receiving MgSO4 should be closely monitored during treatment [5]; also the severe pain and discomfort in injection site in case of IM administration is a problem with this item. On the other hand, some studies have mentioned that MgSO4 cannot be so effective in suppression of preterm labor [6].
Uterine contractions are produced by the effects of prostaglandins. Prostaglandins are a kind of paracrine hormones so they act where they produce. Prostaglandin producing by the decidua and fetal membranes might be one of the essential events of parturition that is followed by initiation of the uterine contraction. It seems likely that prevention of producing prostaglandins or suppression of their effects can stop preterm uterine contraction.
So in theory inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis (including cyclooxygenase inhibitors such as celexib) are capable of arresting uterine contractility and they can prevent preterm birth [7]. Celecoxib is a sulfa nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and selective COX-2 inhibitor. It is known under the brand name Celebrex or Celebra and Onsenal used in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and painful menstruation, menstrual symptoms, and so forth. Celecoxib is available by prescription in capsule form for oral use. Price of celexib significantly was less than MgSO4 price.
A study was on the comparison between MgSO4 and celecoxib to arrest preterm labor. Labor was arrested for 48 h in 42 (81%) and 45 (87%) of the patients in the celecoxib and magnesium sulfate groups, respectively (p-0.298) [8]. We aimed to use celecoxib as a cyclgenase inhibitor to suppression of preterm labor instead of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4 ) to prevent preterm labor.
2. Method
It was a single blinded randomized clinical trial study which had been done on 600 pregnant women with gestational age >24 weeks and <34 weeks; those had referred to Ahvaz Educational Hospitals from March to August 2013. Those patients had criteria for preterm labor diagnosis based on our Ob.-Gyn. textbook [9]. These criteria were as follows:
(i) at least 4th uterine contractions during 20 minutes or 8th uterine contractions during 1 hour followed by progressive changes in the cervical dilatation and effacement,
(ii) the cervical dilatation of more than 2 cm,
(iii): the cervical dilatation of more than 80% at the beginning.
Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects and they received preterm labor routine and maintenance therapy including bed rest and hydration (bolos infusion of 500 CC Ringer lactate during half and over, corticosteroid therapy) and if the uterine preterm contractions did not stop with these modalities, all patients were divided in two groups by simple random sampling; the first group has taken 4 gr of MgSO4 intravenously as loading dose and 1 gr per hour as maintenance dose till suppuration of the uterine contractions or maximum 48 hours and in this period the patients were observed for signs of MgSO4 toxicity by control of the urine output, deep tendon reflex, and respiratory rate. Fetal heart rate was checked regularly. Conditions of the uterine contractions were checked every 2 hours in 20-minute periods. Also the patients were observed for symptoms of headache; the patients' vital signs were checked as routine protocol. The second group had taken 100 mg celecoxib (one capsule) orally every 12 hours till suppuration of the uterine contractions or for maximum duration of 48 hours. The patients in this group were checked for nausea and vomiting and skin rush and headache.
In all subjects if the uterine preterm contractions did not stop with those medications, so immediatry drug has been stopped.
2.1. Inclusion Criteria for This Study
(i) Gestational age ≥24 weeks and <=34 weeks with diagnosis of preterm labor based on upper criteria.
2.2. Exclusion Criteria for This Study
(i) Existing problems that interfere with normal labor process and might need early termination of pregnancy: premature preterm rapture of membrane (PPROM), evidences of placental abruption in clinical and ultrasound examination, and ultrasound, maternal fever chorioamnionitis, none reassuring fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns.
(ii) Contraindication for stopping preterm labor uterine contraction: some maternal medical conditions such as preeclampsia, any signs of vaginal bleeding, fetus anomaly, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), and fetal growth restriction (FGR).
(iii): Issues related to mediations: history of being allergic to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), renal or hepatic dysfunction, concurrent use of other medications except supplements, and history of peptic ulcer.
(iv) The patients' disagreement to enter the study.
(v) Stopping the uterine preterm contractions after initial preterm labor maintenance therapy.
2.3. Ethics
The study protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. All patients provided written informed consent
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS 11 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Age was expressed as mean (standard deviation). Other variables were expressed as frequency (%). Chi-square and independent [figure omitted; refer to PDF] -test were used for statistical analysis. For all analyses, a significance level of [figure omitted; refer to PDF] values < 0.05 was considered significant.
3. Result
The finding of this study has shown that mean age of all subjects was 26.03 ± 4.33 in MgSO4 group and in celecoxib group was 26.6 ± 4.01, 25.8 ± 4.63, respectively. With using independent [figure omitted; refer to PDF] -test, there were no significant differences between mean age subjects in two groups ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ).
Frequencies of gestational age at time of delivery in all subjects were 31.74 ± 1.86 weeks and in MgSO4 group and celecoxib group were 32.1 ± 1.82 and 31.38 ± 1.83 weeks, respectively. The lowest gestational age was 27 weeks and the greatest gestational age was 34 weeks.
Frequencies of nulliparity in all pregnant women were 350 (58.3%), in MgSO4 group were 174 (58%), and in celecoxib group were 176 (58.7%). Frequencies of history of preterm delivery in celexib group were 12 (4%) and in MgSO4 group were 12 (4%).
There were no significant differences between two groups (MgSO4 group and celecoxib group) in frequency of history of preterm labor ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), frequencies of nulliparity ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), duration of drug use and arrest contraction ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), delivery before 48 hours ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), and mean gestational age in lack of response to treatment ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1: Frequency of delivery before and after 48 hours in all subjects.
| MgSO4 | Celecoxib | [figure omitted; refer to PDF] value | ||
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | |
Delivery before 48 hours | 240 | 80 | 227 | 75.7 | 0.201 |
Delivery after 48 hours | 60 | 20 | 30 | 24.3 |
Table 2: Frequency of parity and history of preterm labor in two groups (MgSO4 group and celecoxib group).
Variables | MgSO4 | Celecoxib | [figure omitted; refer to PDF] value | ||
Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
Parity |
|
|
|
|
|
0 | 176 | 58.7 | 174 | 58 | 0.99 |
1 | 64 | 21.3 | 66 | 22 | |
2 | 54 | 18 | 54 | 18 | |
3 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | |
History of preterm labor |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes | 12 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 1 |
No | 288 | 96 | 288 | 96 |
There was significant association between two groups (MgSO4 group and celecoxib group) in frequency of effacement ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), gestational age ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ), and dilation ( [figure omitted; refer to PDF] ) (Table 3).
Table 3: Frequency of gestational age, dilatation, and effacement in two groups.
Variables | MgSO4 | Celecoxib | [figure omitted; refer to PDF] value | ||||
No. | Mean | SD | No. | Mean | SD | ||
Dilatation | 300 | 1.83 | 9.26 | 300 | 1.97 | 8.13 | 0.06 |
Effacement | 300 | 35.93 | 18.07 | 300 | 42 | 15.64 | <=0.0001 |
4. Discussion
About two-thirds of neonatal mortality are due to preterm birth, so preterm labor suppression is a big deal for health care providers. On the other hand decreasing childhood mortality is one of the WHO'S goals by 2015. Celecoxib as a cyclogenase inhibitor might be effective in preterm labor suppression.
A similar study has been done by Borna and Saeidi in 2007 and preterm labor was suppressed in 87% of MgSO4 group and 81% of celecoxib group so their result was similar to our result. They concluded that celecoxib is as effective as MgSO4 in preterm labor suppression [8, 10].
In another study by McWhorter et al. in 2004 the effects of rofecoxib and MgSO4 were compared with each other. They concluded that there was no difference between oral rofecoxib and intravenous magnesium sulfate in arresting preterm labor [9]. Another study compared safety of indomethacin and celecoxib to arrest preterm Labor. They reported that safety of short-term celecoxib in women with preterm labor was superior to indomethacin [10].
In this study 600 pregnant women with preterm labor criteria were randomly divided in two equal groups. MgSO4 was used in one group for suppression of preterm labor and the other group took celecoxib instead of MgSO4 . 80% of MgSO4 group and 75% of celecoxib group showed positive response to these tocolytic agents and uterine contraction stopped at least for 48 hours and cervical dilatation and effacement did not progress in this period of time, but in this aspect; statistical calculation did not show any significant differences between two groups. In our study there were not any significant differences between cervical dilatation in two groups, but from the beginning, cervical effacement showed a significant difference between two groups; we found that although celecoxib group already had more cervical effacement, celecoxib effectiveness was as the same as MgSO4 group. In this study, mean time duration for stopping the uterine contraction did not show any significant differences. Cost effectiveness of celecoxib is more reasonable than MgSO4 and it can play a role in expenses reduction in health centers.
5. Study Limitations
We did not enroll the patients admitted at other hospitals especially private hospitals.
6. Conclusion
Celecoxib is a good alternative for MgSO4 as agents' tocolytic. Because it is cost less and there is better patient's compliance. Using Celecoxib no need for closes monitoring of the patients, and there are not invasive procedures such as injections and same effect of MgSO4 .
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the Deputy of Research of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, and special thanks are due to participants for their participation and help during this research.
Conflict of Interests
There is no conflict of interests for this study.
[1] World Health Organization; March of Dimes; The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health; Save the Children Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth , 2012.
[2] R. L. Goldenberg, J. F. Culhane, J. D. Iams, R. Romero, "Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth," The Lancet , vol. 371, no. 9606, pp. 75-84, 2008.
[3] No. 363, W.H.O.F.s., Preterm birth, 2013
[4] I. Jehan, H. Harris, S. Salat, A. Zeb, N. Mobeen, O. Pasha, E. M. McClure, J. Moore, L. L. Wright, R. L. Goldenberg, "Neonatal mortality, risk factors and causes: a prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan," Bulletin of the World Health Organization , vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 130-138, 2009.
[5] M. F. M. Rameez, D. Lankeshwara, T. Dias, M. Khatri, R. Lohana, "Preterm delivery: current concepts," Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 22-28, 2013.
[6] C. A. Crowther, J. E. Hiller, L. W. Doyle, "Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour," Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , no. 4, 2002.
[7] A. Locatelli, P. Vergani, P. Bellini, N. Strobelt, A. Ghidini, "Can a cyclo-oxygenase type-2 selective tocolytic agent avoid the fetal side effects of indomethacin?," British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology , vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 325-326, 2001.
[8] S. Borna, F. M. Saeidi, "Celecoxib versus magnesium sulfate to arrest preterm labor: randomized trial," Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research , vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 631-634, 2007.
[9] C. S. Stika, G. A. Gross, G. Leguizamon, "A prospective randomized safety trial of celecoxib for treatment of preterm labor," American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology , vol. 187, no. 3, pp. 653-660, 2002.
[10] J. McWhorter, S. J. Carlan, T. D. O'Leary, K. Richichi, W. F. O'Brien, "Rofecoxib versus magnesium sulfate to arrest preterm labor: a randomized trial," Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol. 103, no. 5 I, pp. 923-930, 2004.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2014 Najmieh Saadati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
We aimed to use celecoxib to suppress preterm labor instead magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) to prevent preterm labor. Methods. It was a randomized clinical trial study, which was done on 600 pregnant women. All subjects were divided into two groups by simple random sampling. One group was given 4 grams of MgSO4 intravenously and second group was given 100 mg of celecoxib orally every 12 hours for at least 2 days. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS 11 and performed using t -test and chi-square test. Results. The finding of this study has shown that preterm labor may be prevented in 75.7% of subjects who had received celecoxib and there were no significant difference between two groups in frequency of history of preterm labor ( P = 1 ), frequencies of nulliparity ( P = 0.99 ), duration of drug use and arrest contraction ( P = 0.29 ), delivery before 48 hours ( P = 0.20 ), and mean gestational age in lack of response to treatment ( P = 0.24 ). Conclusions. Result has shown that celecoxib was similar to MgSO4 as a medication to prevent preterm labor; it was recommended to be prescribe to prevent preterm labor, because it was cheaper than magnesium sulfate.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer