Serum Cystatin C Reflects Angiographic Coronary Collateralization in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion

Abstract

Objective

We investigated whether and to what extent cystatin C was associated with angiographic coronary collateralization in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic total occlusion.

Methods

Serum levels of cystatin C and high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were determined in 866 patients with stable angina and angiographic total occlusion of at least one major coronary artery. The degree of collaterals supplying the distal aspect of a total occlusion from the contra-lateral vessel was graded as poor (Rentrop score of 0 or 1) or good coronary collateralization (Rentrop score of 2 or 3).

Results

In total, serum cystatin C was higher in patients with poor collateralization than in those with good collateralization (1.08 ± 0.32 mg/L vs. 0.90 ± 0.34 mg/L, P < 0.001), and correlated inversely with Rentrop score (adjusted Spearmen’s r = -0.145, P < 0.001). The prevalence of poor coronary collateralization increased stepwise with increasing cystatin C quartiles (P for trend < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, risk factors for coronary artery disease, GFR and hsCRP, serum cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L remained independently associated with poor collateralization (OR 2.374, 95% CI 1.660 ~ 3.396, P < 0.001). The diagnostic value of cystatin C levels for detecting poor coronary collateralization persisted regardless of age, gender, presence or absence of diabetes, hypertension or renal dysfunction.

Conclusions

Serum cystatin C reflects angiographic coronary collateralization in patients with stable coronary artery disease, and cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L indicates a great risk of poor coronary collaterals.

About the Authors:

Ying Shen

Contributed equally to this work with: Ying Shen, Feng Hua Ding

Affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China

Feng Hua Ding

Contributed equally to this work with: Ying Shen, Feng Hua Ding

Affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China

Rui Yan Zhang

Affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China

Qi Zhang

Affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China

Lin Lu

Affiliations Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China

Wei Feng Shen

* E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliations Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China, Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, People’s Republic of China

Introduction

Coronary collateral vessels are interarterial connections that potentially offer an alternative source of blood supply to a vascular territory subtended by occluded coronary arteries [1, 2]. Well-formed coronary collaterals are capable of providing a minimum perfusion for jeopardized or hibernating myocardium, preserving left ventricular function, and improving clinical prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease [3–5]. Multiple clinical and biochemical factors and inflammatory cytokines have been suggested to promote or to inhibit the formation of coronary collaterals, and collateral growth is also influenced by the severity of coronary artery disease [6–12]. Cystatin C, an endogenous anti-angiogenic factor, was considered as an emerging biomarker in cardiovascular disease and proved to be an important predictor for adverse outcomes among patients with coronary artery disease [13–15]. However, the diagnostic value of serum cystatin C for evaluating coronary collateralization has been largely unclear. Since early detection of poor coronary collateralization may have clinical relevance as cardiovascular mortality associated with coronary artery disease with or without diabetes or chronic kidney disease is significantly higher partly due to impaired coronary collateralization [1–3], it is pertinent to examine the relationship between serum cystatin C and coronary collateralization in patients with stable coronary artery disease. In this study, we hypothesized that elevated cystatin C level is an indicator of poor coronary collateralization in patients with stable coronary artery disease. We selected a unique cohort of patients with stable angina and chronic total occlusion and assessed the presence and degree of coronary collateralization using the Rentrop scoring system, as a severe coronary stenosis especially complete obstruction is a prerequisite for spontaneous collateral recruitment and this angiographic assessment of coronary collaterals is routinely applied in clinical practice [16, 17]. Serum levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were also determined to compare inflammatory condition in these patients.

Subjects and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Written informed consents were obtained from all patients, and clinical investigation was conducted according to the principle of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Subjects

Initially, we screened a total of 1092 consecutive patients with stable angina and chronic total occlusion (> 3 months) of at least one major epicardial coronary artery between March 2009 and February 2015 from the database of Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Development of CAD Program (AGENDA, S1 Document) in Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai. This program included coronary artery disease patients with or without diabetes, aiming to investigate the mechanisms of atherosclerosis and elements affecting this process including advanced glycation endproducts in diabetes. Two-hundred and twenty six patients were excluded by the following exclusion criteria: (a) percutaneous coronary intervention within the prior 3 months; (b) previous coronary artery bypass grafting; (c) renal failure requiring hemodialysis; (d) chronic heart failure, pulmonary heart disease, malignant tumor or immune system disorders; (e) type 1 diabetes; and (f) unavailability of cystatin C data. Finally, 866 patients fit the inclusion criteria and composed the study cohort (Fig 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Flowchart of patient enrollment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.g001

Hypertension, type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia were defined according to European Society of Hypertension (ESH) / European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension [18], criteria of the American Diabetes Association [19], and Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) [20], respectively. Stable angina was diagnosed based on the criteria of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association [21].

Angiography and Collateral Grading

Coronary angiography was performed via the femoral or radial access with 6Fr diagnostic catheters. The angiographic assessment was done independently by two blinded interventional cardiologists (RYZ, QZ), according to lesion classification scheme of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association [22]. In case of disagreement, the difference in interpretation was resolved by a third reviewer (WFS). The Rentrop scoring system was used to grade collateral filling from the contra-lateral vessel (often via connections of the epicardial surface or intraventricular septum) as described previously [17]: 0 = none; 1 = filling of side branches only; 2 = partially filling of the epicardial segment; 3 = complete filling of the epicardial segment. Poor coronary collateralization was defined as Rentrop score 0 or 1 and good coronary collateralization was defined as Rentrop score 2 or 3, as in previous studies [6–10]. In patients with more than one chronic total occlusion, the vessel with the highest collateral grade was chosen for analysis.

Biochemical Measurement and Estimation of GFR

We obtained blood samples at the day of angiography in all patients after an overnight fasting, and stored them at -80°C until analysis. Assessment of serum levels of creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, lipid profiles, glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), was made with standard laboratory techniques [7, 8]. Serum cystatin C was determined by high sensitive latex-enhanced immune- turbidimetric method with an automatic biochemical analyzer (7600–020; Hitachi Inc, Tokyo, Japan) [23, 24], and hsCRP level was assayed by ELISA (Biocheck Laboratories, Toledo, OH, USA). Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the creatinine-based abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula [25].

Statistical Analysis

EpiData Entry 3.1 Software was used for data entry and documentation, and EXCEL was adopted to manage database. SPSS 20.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and number (percentages). For continuous variables, differences between groups were evaluated by t test for normally distributed values; otherwise, the Mann-Whitney U test was applied. For categorical variables, differences between groups were evaluated with the chi-square test. Spearman’s rho test was used to assess the correlation between serum cystatin C and Rentrop scores. The serum levels of cystatin C were divided into 4 groups according to quartile distribution. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease including smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes, multi-vessel disease, GFR, and hsCRP were performed to detect the relationship between poor collateralization and serum levels of cystatin C. Regression models with above-mentioned potential confounding factors (model 1) and further inclusion of serum cystatin C (model 2) were also developed to explore the independent determinants for poor collateralization. Hosmer–Lemeshow X² test was used for model calibration. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed with serum cystatin C and predicted probabilities (C statistic) for poor collateralization derived from regression models with and without cystatin C. The areas under the curves (AUC) were compared using DeLong method with MedCalc software for windows (version 11.4, Mariakerke, Belgium). The likelihood ratio test and the net reclassification improvements (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvements (IDI) were used to assess the improvement of goodness of fit and predictive performance for model 2 compared with model 1 [26]. All analyses used 2-sided tests with an overall significance level of alpha = 0.05.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Among overall 866 patients included in the final analysis, poor and good coronary collateralization was detected in 344 and 522 patients, respectively. Patients with poor coronary collateralization were older, females and cigarette smokers in higher percentage and had more diabetes and dyslipidemia but were less hypertensive than those with good collateralization (for all comparisons, P < 0.01). Despite similar degree of coronary artery disease and medical treatments, diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and GFR were lower, but serum levels of creatinine and hsCRP were more elevated in those with poor collateralization (Table 1).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and biochemical assessment in patients with poor and good collateralization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.t001

Serum Cystatin C and Coronary Collateralization

Serum cystatin C was significantly higher in patients with poor collateralization than in those with good collateralization (1.08 ± 0.32 mg/L vs. 0.90 ± 0.34 mg/L, P < 0.001), and correlated inversely with Rentrop score before (Spearmen’s r = -0.263, P < 0.001) and after (Spearmen’s r = -0.145, P < 0.001) adjusting for gender, age, BMI, traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease (including smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes), multi-vessel disease, GFR and serum level of hsCRP. In addition, the prevalence of poor coronary collaterals increased stepwise from the lowest quartile (< 0.76 mg/L) to the highest quartile of serum cystatin C (≥ 1.11 mg/L) (P for trend < 0.001) (Fig 2). Odds ratio for poor collateralization increased to 6.300 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.065 ~ 9.764) in the highest compared with those in the lowest quartile of cystatin C level (P < 0.001). These associations remained significant after adjusting for multiple variables (OR: 7.021, 95% CI 4.261 ~ 11.570, P < 0.001) (Table 2).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. Prevalence of poor collateralization in patients across quartiles of serum cystatin C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.g002

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 2. Odds ratio of poor collateralization according to cystatin C in patients with chronic total occlusion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.t002

ROC curve analysis showed that AUC was 0.687 (95% CI 0.652 ~ 0.722, P < 0.001) and the optimal cut-point of serum cystatin C was 0.97 mg/L, with a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 61.3% and 67.2% for the presence of poor coronary collateralization.

Risk for Poor Collateralization

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, gender, traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease, GFR and serum level of hsCRP were determinants for poor coronary collateralization (model 1). After adjustment for these variables, serum cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L remained independently associated with poor collateralization (OR: 2.374, 95% CI 1.660 ~ 3.396, P < 0.001) (model 2) (Table 3). The calibrations of both models were good (P = 0.480 and P = 0.791, respectively). Compared with model 1, the addition of serum cystatin C (≥ 0.97 mg/L) in model 2 significantly improved the goodness-of-fit and predictive performance with an increase of Nagelkerke R² of 7.3% (P < 0.001) and C statistic of 0.039 (95% CI 0.020 ~ 0.059, P < 0.001) (Fig 3) and a NRI and IDI of 10.5% (95% CI 4.6% ~ 16.4%, P < 0.001) and 5.9% (95% CI 4.3% ~ 7.5%, P < 0.001), respectively.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. Receiver operating characteristic curves of predicted probabilities derived from regression models for detecting poor collateralization.

Model 1 includes variables of age, gender, body mass index, traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and smoke), multi-vessel disease, GFR and serum level of high sensitive C reactive protein. Model 2 includes variables in model 1 and serum cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.g003

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3. Logistic regression analyses for poor collateralization in patients with chronic total occlusion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.t003

Diagnostic Value of Cystatin C in Different Patient Subgroups

We performed the sensitivity analyses according to age, sex, and presence or absence of overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m²), diabetes, hypertension and at least mild renal dysfunction (GFR < 90 mL/min/1.73m²) (Table 4). The diagnostic value of cystatin C for detecting poor coronary collateralization was consistent in all patient subgroups, with the AUCs ranging from 0.585 to 0.732 (all P < 0.01). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, serum cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L was independently associated with poor coronary collateralization (OR: 2.630 ~ 5.484, all P < 0.01). The calibrations of all models with and without cystatin C were good (P ≥ 0.125). Compared with the models with traditional variables, additional inclusion of serum cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L also significantly improved the goodness-of-fit and predictive performance in all subgroup analyses with an increase of Nagelkerke R² of 2.9% ~ 10.9% (all P < 0.01), C statistic of 0.029 ~ 0.058 (all P < 0.05), and a NRI and IDI of 8.0% ~ 18.2% (all P < 0.05) and 3.7% ~ 9.6% (all P < 0.001), respectively (Table 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 4. The diagnostic value of serum cystatin C for evaluation of poor collateralization in different patients subgroups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.t004

Discussion

This study showed that elevated serum cystatin C was associated with poor coronary collateralization in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic total occlusion.

It is well recognized that after coronary artery occlusion, myocardial blood flow distal to occluded segment could be, at least partly, restored by collateral formation mainly through two different processes of blood vessel growth. New capillaries may form via ischemia-induced sprouting from post-capillary venules (angiogenesis), and the development and maturation of these newly growing vessels are regulated by a balance of pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors. Arteriogenesis denotes a transformation of pre-existing arterioles into functional (muscular) collateral arteries and is predominantly stimulated by pressure gradient across the occluded segment and tangential fluid shear stress at the vessel wall. Arteriogenesis, not angiogenesis, is the leading mechanism in restoring blood flow following arterial occlusion. Both processes are related to endothelial and smooth muscle cells and various growth factors and adversely affected by inflammatory cytokines [27]. Collateral growth in patients with coronary artery disease is highly heterogeneous and influenced by a number of factors. We found that old age, female gender, traditional risk factors for coronary artery disease, and reduced renal function were associated with poor collateralization, whereas hypertension, especially elevated diastolic blood pressure, correlated with well-formed coronary collaterals. Several studies have suggested that poorly developed coronary collaterals may be related to chronic inflammation of low degree, as evidenced by elevated serum levels of cytokines such as hsCRP [28], tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [29], soluble endothelial adhesion molecules [30], monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [31], and C1q/TNF-related protein-1 [8], which inhibit key components of angiogenesis particularly endothelial progenitor cell differentiation, survival and function. Recently, apelin has been shown to promote angiogenesis, and its serum levels were associated with coronary collateral development [32]. Akin et al revealed that white blood cell subtypes, especially the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, can be used as an indicator of systemic inflammation, and an elevated neutrophil- to-lymphocyte ratio was independently associated with impaired coronary collateral formation in patients with stable coronary artery disease [9]. High serum cystatin C was thought to be related directly to both inflammation and atherosclerosis [13]. Some studies have highlighted that inflammatory cytokines stimulate lysosomal cathepsins, which may be associated with increased cystatin C levels [33]. These effects could cause worse vascular endothelial changes, inflammation and atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the role of cystatin C in the formation of coronary collaterals remains largely unclear. The present study demonstrated that poor coronary collateralization corresponded significantly with elevated cystatin C levels, which is contrast to a previous report showing no significant difference in serum cystatin C between patients with poor and good coronary collaterals [34]. The exact explanation behind these different results may be, at least partly, related to a heterogeneous population in their study, which contained a small number of diabetic patients (< 20% in the final analysis) and a significant proportion of patients with acute coronary syndrome (approximately 50%) or non-occluded coronary lesions [34]. It is well documented that hyperglycemia abolished the formation of coronary collateral vessels [35], and diabetes represents an independent risk factor for poor coronary collateralization [10, 36]. In addition, cysteine proteases are associated with formation of necrotic core and rupture of the cap, as well as macrophage apoptosis in atherosclerotic plaques, and the synthesis of cystatin C may be significantly increased during acute myocardial ischemia [37]. Notably, the recruitment of coronary collaterals is predominantly driven by shear force along the pressure gradient that develops when the native vessel is tightly stenotic or even completely occluded [16, 38]. In view of these conditions and for avoiding possible confounding factors, we analyzed the relationship between serum cystatin C and coronary collateralization in a unique cohort of patients with stable angina and chronic total occlusion.

The main finding of this study is that serum cystatin C correlated inversely with Rentrop score even after adjusting for multiple variables including GFR and levels of hsCRP. The prevalence of poor coronary collateralization increased stepwise with increasing cystatin C quartiles. An optimal cut-off point of serum cystatin C level of 0.97 mg/L provided a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 61.3% and 67.2% for the presence of poor coronary collateralization. Patients with a cystatin C ≥ 0.97mg/L had 2.37-fold increased risk of poor collateralization. Interestingly, additional inclusion of serum cystatin C ≥ 0.97 mg/L in the model significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy for poor coronary collateralization in all subgroup population based on age, gender, presence or absence of diabetes, hypertension, or at least mild renal dysfunction by 8.0–18.2%. These observations support a notion that anti-angiogenic cystatin C is an indicator of coronary collateral formation in patients with stable coronary artery disease and chronic total occlusion. The results of the present study are also in line with our previous findings that cystatin C-based equation was superior to creatinine-based formula for estimating GFR and identifying poor collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease [24]. Because available data on cystatin C-based GFR equation remain very limited, and measurement of cystatin C is inexpensive and easily available, the possible use of serum cystatin C as a marker for risk of poor coronary collateralization would be desirable and clinically meaningful in the management of stable coronary artery disease patients.

It is evident that the effect of cystatin C levels on coronary collateralization reflects the net result of several pathophysiological processes. Cystatin C per se displays anti-angiogenic characteristics by reducing endothelial cell tubule formation and cysteinyl cathepsin activities [37, 39]. Furthermore, cystatin C as a cysteine proteinase inhibitor is associated with cardiovascular risk factors as well as inflammation, which may promote vascular endothelial damage and cause poor collateralization [13, 15]. Notably, approximately 60% of patients had type 2 diabetes in the present study. Previous reports including ours have shown that an interaction between advanced glycation endproducts (AGE) and receptor for AGE (RAGE) plays a critical role in the acceleration of coronary atherosclerosis and abnormal collateral vessel formation [10,35,36]. Likewise, renal dysfunction which commonly occurs in patients with severe coronary artery disease and is partly reflected by elevated serum levels of cystatin C, adversely affect several components necessary for collateral growth through various regulatory mechanisms and gene expression [40–44].

The development of coronary collaterals may be also influenced by medications. It has been shown that statin treatment was associated with good collateralization assessed by the Rentrop classification due partly to reduced apoptosis [45], whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) therapy contributed to poor collateral development in patients with coronary occlusion via inhibiting the expression of angiotensin II-induced growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor [46]. Recently, van der Hoeven et al reported a positive relation between chronic use of βblockers and well-formed collaterals assessed by collateral flow index [47]. The use of βblockers reduces heart rate and improves fluid shear stress at the endothelial wall which stimulates coronary collateral growth. In addition, βblockers could decrease catecholamine-mediated inflammatory response. In this study we did not observe an association between medical treatments with statins, ACEI or βblockers and angiographic grade of coronary collateralization.

Although the Rentrop scoring system is the most widely used angiographic mean for grading coronary collateralization in routine clinical practice, it shows only a weak correlation with invasive parameters of collateral function and does not actually rate the collaterals themselves, but their effect in filling the occluded arterial segment [17]. Furthermore, adequate angiographic plane and optimal axial alignment of the catheter during contrast injection and acquisition time of collateral filling are important for assessing collateral circulation using the Rentrop method. Measurement of coronary flow index which requires simultaneous recordings of central aortic pressure and the distal pressure within the occluded segment of the coronary artery represents the “gold standard” for evaluating the competence and functional significance of coronary collaterals. However, coronary flow index can only be determined during coronary intervention, and meticulous care should be taken to keep the guiding catheter away from the coronary orifice during aortic pressure recording and to ensure the absence of antegrade flow leakage after pressure wire passage.

One of the limitations is that the study design was one of retrospective analysis for the point of coronary collateral investigation; thus, it allows us to detect association but not to predict outcome. Nevertheless, these results may reflect true associations in the real world setting as prescription data were captured from a standard database. Another limitation is that our study did not include other possible factors influencing collateral development in patients with coronary artery disease especially inflammatory cytokines [8–12, 28–31], although the effects of the established clinical variables were evaluated by multivariate analysis. The relative strength of a model by incorporating all potential biomarkers for predicting poor coronary collateralization deserves further investigations.

In conclusion, the present study is the first to demonstrate an association between elevated serum cystatin C and reduced angiographic coronary collateralization in a large cohort of stable coronary disease patients with chronic total occlusion. The optimal cut-point of cystatin C in serum of ≥ 0.97 mg/L indicates a great increased risk of poor coronary collateralization. These findings may provide new insights on risk assessment and management strategy for this unique high-risk population.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Document. Protocol Registration Receipt: Advanced Glycation Endproducts and Development of CAD (AGENDA) (NCT02089360).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253.s001

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: YS. Performed the experiments: RYZ QZ LL. Analyzed the data: FHD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LL. Wrote the paper: WFS.

Citation: Shen Y, Ding FH, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, Lu L, Shen WF (2015) Serum Cystatin C Reflects Angiographic Coronary Collateralization in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0137253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137253

References

1. Traupe T, Gloekler S, de Marchi SF, Werner GS, Seiler C (2010) Assessment of the human coronary collateral circulation. Circulation122:1210–1220. pmid:20855668

2. Hsu PC, Su HM, Lee HC, Juo SH, Lin TH, Voon WC, et al. (2014) Coronary collateral circulation in patients of coronary ectasia with significant coronary artery disease. PLoS One 9:e87001. pmid:24475209

3. Celik T, Iyisoy A, Yuksel CU, Celik M, Isik E (2010) The prognostic significance of coronary collaterals in patients with ischemic heart disease: an essential response to ischemia. Int J Cardiol138:101–103. pmid:18657333

4. Meier P, Hemingway H, Lansky AJ, Knapp G, Pitt B, Seiler C. (2012) The impact of the coronary collateral circulation on mortality: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 33:614–621. pmid:21969521

5. Shen Y, Wu F, Pan C, Zhu T, Zhang Q, Zhang RY, et al. (2014) Clinical relevance of angiographic coronary collaterals during primary coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl) 127:66–71.

6. Sun Z, Shen Y, Lu L, Zhang RY, Pu LJ, Zhang Q, et al. (2013) Clinical and angiographic features associated with coronary collateralization in stable angina patients with chronic total occlusion. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 14:705–712. pmid:23897789

7. Shen Y, Ding FH, Wu F, Lu L, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, et al. (2015) Association of blood pressure and coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic patients with stable angina and chronic total occlusion. J Hypertens 33:621–626. pmid:25490709

8. Shen Y, Lu L, Liu ZH, Wu F, Zhu JZ, Sun Z, et al. (2014) Increased serum level of CTRP1 is associated with low coronary collateralization in stable angina patients with chronic total occlusion. Int J Cardiol 174:203–206. pmid:24746545

9. Akın F, Ayça B, Çelik Ö, Şahin C (2015) Predictors of poor coronary collateral development in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelets. Anatol J Cardiol 15:218–223. pmid:25880175

10. Shen Y, Lu L, Ding FH, Sun Z, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, et al. (2013) Association of increased serum glycated albumin levels with low coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with stable angina and chronic total occlusion. Cardiovasc Diabetol 12:165. pmid:24209601

11. van den Hengel LG, Hellingman AA, Nossent AY, van Oeveren-Rietdijk AM, de Vries MR, Spek CA, et al. (2013) Protease-activated receptor (PAR)2, but not PAR1, is involved in collateral formation and anti-inflammatory monocyte polarization in a mouse hind limb ischemia model. PLoS One 8:e61923. pmid:23637930

12. Keeley EC, Moorman JR, Liu L, Gimple LW, Lipson LC, Ragosta M, et al. (2011) Plasma chemokine levels are associated with the presence and extent of angiographic coronary collaterals in chronic ischemic heart disease. PLoS One 6:e21174. pmid:21731663

13. Angelidis C, Deftereos S, Giannopoulos G, Anatoliotakis N, Bouras G, Hatzis G, et al. (2013) Cystatin C: an emerging biomarker in cardiovascular disease. Curr Top Med Chem 13:164–179. pmid:23470076

14. Liu F, Shen J, Zhao J, Zeng H, Li L, Zhao J, et al. (2013) Cystatin C: a strong marker for lower limb ischemia in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients? PLoS One 8:e66907. pmid:23843968

15. Ferraro S, Marano G, Biganzoli EM, Boracchi P, Bongo AS (2011) Prognostic value of cystatin C in acute coronary syndromes: enhancer of atherosclerosis and promising therapeutic target. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:1397–1404. pmid:21605013

16. Levin DC (1974) Pathways and functional significance of the coronary collateral circulation. Circulation 50:831–837. pmid:4425386

17. Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA (1985) Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 5:587–592. pmid:3156171

18. Task Force Members (2013) 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 31:1281–1357. pmid:23817082

19. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (2003) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 26 Suppl 1:S5–20. pmid:12502614

20. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (2001) Executive Summary of The Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285:2486–2497. pmid:11368702

21. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, et al. (2007) 2007 chronic angina focused update of the ACC/AHA 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Group to develop the focused update of the 2002 guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:2264–2274. pmid:18061078

22. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ, et al. (1990) Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 82:1193–1202. pmid:2401060

23. Feng JF, Qiu L, Zhang L, Li XM, Yang YW, Zeng P, et al. (2013) Multicenter study of creatinine- and/or cystatin C-based equations for estimation of glomerular filtration rates in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. PLoS One 8:e57240. pmid:23526939

24. Shen Y, Ding FH, Wu F, Sun Z, Zhang RY, Zhang Q, et al. (2014) Cystatin C versus creatinine- based definition of renal dysfunction for predicting poor coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Diabetes & Metab 5:453–459.

25. Ma YC, Zuo L, Chen JH, Luo Q, Yu XQ, Li Y, et al. (2006) Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:2937–2944. pmid:16988059

26. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, D'Agostino RB Jr, Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27:157–172. pmid:17569110

27. Seiler C, Stoller M, Pitt B, Meier P (2013) The human coronary collateral circulation: development and clinical importance. Eur Heart J 34:2674–2682. pmid:23739241

28. Kerner A, Gruberg L, Goldberg A, Roguin A, Lavie P, Lavie L, et al. (2007) Relation of C-reactive protein to coronary collaterals in patients with stable angina pectoris and coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 99: 509–512. pmid:17293195

29. Seiler C, Pohl T, Billinger M, Meier B (2003) Tumour necrosis factor alpha concentration and collateral flow in patients with coronary artery disease and normal systolic left ventricular function. Heart 89: 96–97. pmid:12482804

30. Guray U, Erbay AR, Guray Y, Yılmaz MB, Boyacı AA, Sasmaz H, et al. (2004) Poor coronary collateral circulation is associated with higher concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules in patients with single vessel disease. Coron Artery Dis 15: 413–417. pmid:15492590

31. Sahinarslan A, Kocaman SA, Topal S, Ercin U, Bukan N, Yalcin R, et al. (2010) Relation between serum monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and coronary collateral development. Coron Artery Dis 21:455–459. pmid:20859200

32. Akboga MK, Akyel A, Sahinarslan A, Demirtas CY, Yayla C, Boyaci B, et al. (2014) Relationship between plasma apelin level and coronary collateral circulation. Atherosclerosis 235:289–294. pmid:24905139

33. Li W, Kornmark L, Jonasson L, Forssell C, Yuan XM (2009) Cathepsin L is significantly associated with apoptosis and plaque destabilization in human atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 202:92–102. pmid:18495127

34. Zhang J, Wang P, Huang YB, Li J, Zhu J, Luo X, et al. (2010) Plasma cathepsin L and its related pro/antiangiogenic factors play useful roles in predicting rich coronary collaterals in patients with coronary heart disease. J Int Med Res 38:1389–1403. pmid:20926012

35. Abaci A 1, Oğuzhan A, Kahraman S, Eryol NK, Unal S, Arinc H, et al. (1999) Effect of diabetes mellitus on formation of coronary collateral vessels. Circulation 99:2239–2242. pmid:10226087

36. Rocic P (2012) Why is coronary collateral growth impaired in type II diabetes and the metabolic syndrome? Vascul Pharmacol 57:179–186. pmid:22342811

37. Taglieri N, Koenig W, Kaski JC (2009) Cystatin C and cardiovascular risk. Clin Chem 55:1932–1943. pmid:19713275

38. Schaper W (2009) Collateral circulation. Past and present. Basic Res Cardiol 104:5–21. pmid:19101749

39. Lv BJ, Lindholt JS, Cheng X, Wang J, Shi GP (2012) Plasma cathepsin S and cystatin C levels and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized population-based study. PLoS One 7:e41813. pmid:22844527

40. Ying Y, Yang K, Liu Y, Chen QJ, Shen WF, Lu L, et al. (2011) A uremic solute, P-cresol, inhibits the proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells via the p38 pathway. Circ J 75:2252–2259. pmid:21747198

41. Hsu PC, Juo SH, Su HM, Chen SC, Tsai WC, Lai WT, et al. (2012) Predictor of poor coronary collaterals in chronic kidney disease population with significant coronary artery disease. BMC Nephrol 13:98. pmid:22935602

42. Xie SL, Li HY, Deng BQ, Luo NS, Geng DF, Wang JF, et al. (2011) Poor coronary collateral vessel development in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Clin Res Cardiol 100:227–233. pmid:20865265

43. Kadi H, Ceyhan K, Sogut E, Koc F, Celik A, Onalan O, et al. (2011) Mildly decreased glomerular filtration rate is associated with poor coronary collateral circulation in patients with coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol 34:617–621. pmid:21887692

44. Kobayashi S, Maesato K, Moriya H, Ohtake I (2005) Insulin resistance in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 45:275–280.

45. Dincer I, Ongun A, Turhan S, Ozdol C, Kumbasar D, Erol C. (2006) Association between the dosage and duration of statin treatment with coronary collateral development. Coron Artery Dis 17:561–565. pmid:16905969

46. Altin T, Kilickap M, Tutar E, Turhan S, Atmaca Y, Gulec S, et al. (2007). The relationship of chronic angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use and coronary collateral vessel development. Int Heart J 48:435–442. pmid:17827815

47. van der Heoven NW, Teunissen PF, Werner GS, Delewi R, Schirmer SH, Traupe T, et al. (2013) Clinical parameters associated with collateral development in patients with chronic coronary total occlusion. Heart 99:1100–1105. pmid:23716567