http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75:432DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3669-1&domain=pdf
Web End = Solution for a local straight cosmic string in the braneworld gravity
M. C. B. Abdalla1,a, P. F. Carlesso1,b, J. M. Hoff da Silva2,c
1 Instituto de Fsica Terica, UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Dr. Bento Teobaldo Ferraz 271, Bloco II, Barra-Funda, Caixa Postal 70532-2, So Paulo, SP 01156-970, Brazil
2 Departamento de Fsica e Qumica, UNESP, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. Dr. Ariberto Pereira da Cunha, 333, Guaratinguet, SP, Brazil Received: 14 July 2015 / Accepted: 8 September 2015 / Published online: 16 September 2015 The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract In this work we deal with the spacetime shaped by a straight cosmic string, emerging from local gauge theories, in the braneworld gravity context. We search for physical consequences of string features due to the modied gravitational scenario encoded in the projected gravitational equations. It is shown that cosmic strings in braneworld gravity may present signicant differences when compared to the general relativity predictions, since its linear density is modied and the decit angle produced by the cosmic string is attenuated. Furthermore, the existence of cosmic strings in that scenario requires a strong restriction to the braneworld tension: 3 1017, in Planck units.
1 Introduction
Cosmic strings were predicted in the 1970s by Kibble [1], as a result of phase transitions in the early universe. The breaking of symmetries in eld theories that describe the matter content in the universe can produce such structures. The properties of the defects are related to the epoch in which the symmetry has been broken. For instance, the strings produced for a grand unication theory have a linear density much greater than strings produced later on, for an electroweak theory.The cosmic strings can have cosmological and astrophysical consequences that were exhaustively studied in the literature [2,3].
In spite of the theoretical advances in the cosmic string studies, till now there is no convincing observational evidence as to the existence of such structures. Furthermore, the linear density associated with cosmic strings is strongly
a e-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected]
b e-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected]
c e-mail: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected]
bounded by data analysis from the WMAP and most recently from the Planck collaboration [4].
Relatively recent work has shown that cosmic strings can emerge from string theories [57]. The production of cosmic fundamental and gauge strings is predicted by braneworld ination scenarios. These scenarios intend to explain ination from rst principles. The fundamental strings have similar cosmological properties with the gauge strings. For that, a necessary condition is that the fundamental string scale needs to be comparable to the GUT scale of the gauge strings [6].
The close relation between cosmic strings and brane models impels us to study a scenario with cosmic strings within the braneworld gravity context, providing a way to distinguish ordinary cosmic strings predicted from standard cosmology to strings emerging from braneworld scenarios. In fact, in braneworld models the effective gravitational dynamics can suffer modications when compared with 4-dimensional general relativity (GR) [811].
The main aim of this work is to investigate the consequences of braneworld modied gravity equations related to cosmic strings. For this purpose, we analyze the spacetime generated by a cosmic string in an effective braneworld gravitational eld. In that scenario, we have a 3-brane (in which the standard model elds are conned or localized) embedded in a ve-dimensional bulk, with the extra dimension provided with a Z2 symmetry. The gravitational eld equations differ from the usual Einsteins equations due to the presence of two new terms: a term quadratically dependent to the brane stress-energy tensor and a term resulting from the projection of the bulk Weyl curvature tensor on the brane. Therewith, we analyze and discuss the consequences of these two additional terms in a spacetime generated by a straight cosmic string.
The work is organized as follows: in Sect. 2 we introduce the basic gravitational equations of the braneworld model, namely the RandallSundrum II model [8]. The gravitational
123
432 Page 2 of 7 Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :432
modications of the brane model with respect to the standard general relativity gravity are then presented. The modications are exposed via the projective formalism introduced in Refs. [9,10]. In Sect. 3 we introduce the cosmic string model, which is a nite thickness straight cosmic string [12,13].We obtain an internal solution to the cosmic string in the braneworld model. It allows us to determine the cosmic string effective linear density. Next, we obtain an external solution to the cylindrically symmetric vacuum outside the cosmic string. We link these two solutions by means of junction conditions. The external case presents conical geometry, in which the decit angle produced by the cosmic strings in the braneworld model is presented. We show that the study of these types of cosmic string allows us to constrain signicantly the brane tension. In Sect. 4 we draw our conclusions.
2 The braneworld model
The scenario considered here is based on the Randall
Sundrum model [8], which consists of a 3-brane embedded in a ve-dimensional bulk. The standard model particles are assumed to live on the brane, whereas the gravity law covers all the ve dimensions. The extra spatial dimension is provided with Z2 symmetry.
The braneworld model implies modications in the brane gravitational dynamics. Such modications can be obtained in a perturbative regime, as done in the original paper [8].Nevertheless it is possible to reach the exact brane effective gravitation through notions of extrinsic geometry and the use of some appropriate junction conditions [9,10], allowing one to fully characterize the modications coming from the braneworld set-up. The effective gravitational equations are [9,10]
G = g + 8GT + k45 E, (1) where G is the brane Einstein tensor, E is a term resulting from the projection of the bulk Weyl curvature tensor on the brane, and is a term related to the brane stress-energy tensor T:
=
14 T T +
112 T T+
Furthermore, we have a brane effective cosmological constant given by
=
1
2k25 5 +
16k252 , (4)
where 5 represents the bulk cosmological constant.
Moreover, there are two equations representing the energy conservation in the bulkbrane system,
T = 0, (5)
(k45 E) = 0. (6)
Turning back to the E term, it carries information as regards the bulk curvature, which is unknown. A useful way to express its degrees of freedom is in a cosmological uid form [11], known as a Weyl uid,
E = k4 U uu
13h + P + Q(u) , (7)
where we decompose the metric tensor by means of a 4-velocity eld (g = h +uu). U = k4Euu represents the dark radiation component, P = k4[h(h)
13 hh]E is the anisotropic pressure, and Q = k4hEu is the energy ux associated to the Weyl (or dark) uid. In what follows we shall investigate the behavior of a straight cosmic string under the inuence of a typical E. In Ref. [14] a recent study taking into account the physical effects of dark radiation in the bulk as well as on the brane is presented.
3 The solution for a straight cosmic string
In order to obtain a gravitational solution for spacetime shaped by the presence of the cosmic string we need to dene the stress-energy tensor of the source. Local gauge strings have the energy distribution strongly localized over the symmetry axis [15]; this is true for cosmic string solutions both in Minkowski and curved spacetimes [16]. In addition, if we consider a straight cosmic string, a suitable representation for its stress-energy tensor is given by [12,13]
T = diag(1, 0, 0, 1), (8)
in cylindrical coordinates {t, , , z}. In this representation,
the cosmic string is characterized by two constants: 0 representing the string radius and representing the energy density. For < 0 the energy density assumes a constant value , whereas for > 0 it vanishes. Thus we can compute two solutions for the string spacetime: an internal constant
18 gTT
1
24 gT 2.
(2)
Equations (1) and (2) are obtained considering the minimal extension of GR to ve dimensions, where k25 represents the ve-dimensional coupling constant. The brane properties are represented by its tension . The Newton gravitational constant is given by those parameters,
G =
k4548 . (3)
123
Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :432 Page 3 of 7 432
energy solution and an external vacuum solution. These solutions will be related by means of some junction conditions on the border of the string. In the usual general relativity, it implies a conical spacetime surrounding the string in which the decit angle is related to the string linear density [12,13].
GR solutions for straight cosmic strings lead to a conical spacetime [2], with an exterior line element given by
ds2 = dt2 + dz2 + dr2 + (1 8G)r2d2.
The constant energy approximation (8) leads to the same GR solution, but it does not generate a singularity at the origin, so it is a good approximation for straight cosmic strings.Although the solution (9) can generate gravitational lensing and contribute to overdensities in the matter distribution due to the conical geometry, it is a at solution which implies no gravitational force due to the cosmic string. A more realistic model needs to take into account a wiggly structure for the cosmic string.
3.1 The internal solution
We proceed to obtain a solution for the above cosmic string in braneworld effective gravity. The extra terms in effective equations can break the cylindrical symmetry and spacetime staticity. In order, however, to compare with the GR solution for the same system, we will seek a static and cylindrically symmetric solution. These assumptions imply the following form for the spacetime line element:
ds2 = e2()dt2 +e2()d2 +e2 ()d2 +e2()dz2, (9)
which allows us to compute the left-hand side of Eq. (1). Furthermore, considering the stress-energy tensor (8) the expression (2) and lead to only two non-vanishing components:
11 = 22 =
We stress that Eq. (11) cannot be applied to every braneworld context. Indeed, depending on the spacetime symmetries the Weyl tensor vanishes identically. However, for braneworld models with some extra gravitational inuence in the bulk, as a bulk black hole for instance [17], or the existence of discrete gravitational modes endowed by the presence of a second brane in the bulk, the Weyl tensor projection can be explored in a broader sense [11]. Equations (8), (10), and (11) allow us to compute the conservation equations. From Eq. (5) we have
+ = 0, (13)
which implies + = constant. The constant can be
absorbed by a simple coordinate change, leading to
= . (14)
Equation (6) leads to
13U + P 1 +
43 U + +
P P2 P3 = 0.(15)
Furthermore, we can compute the gravitational equations from (1),
e2( 2 + 2 + + )= 8G k4U, (16)
e2 2 =
k45 2
12 +
+
k4
3 U + k4 P1, (17)
e2 2 =
k4
k45 2
12 +
3 U + k4 P2, (18)
e2( 2 + 2 + + + )
= 8G +
k4
112 2. (10) Since the inuence of the cosmological constant is not relevant for our analysis, we discard it in the effective equations (1). The remaining term is the Weyl uid. In order to accomplish a solution for the static and cylindrically symmetric metric, we discard the energy ux term in (7). It allows us to write the Weyl uid in the following form:
E = k4diag U, P1 +
13U, P2 +
13U, P3 +
3 U + k4 P3, (19)
in which we already imposed the constraint (14).
Subtracting Eq. (17) from (18) we have
2e2 2 = k4(P2 P1). (20)
Lorentz invariance in the z direction requires = , but it
implies, from (14), = 0. So, the above equation tells us that
Lorentz invariance requires P1 = P2. In order to compare the
case at hand with the usual GR solutions, we assume that this is indeed the case. Therefore, we obtain relations for U and P3,
U =
1 3U ,
(11)
where U and Pi are functions of the radial coordinate only. Furthermore, the Pi functions satisfy a null-trace condition
P1 + P2 + P3 = 0. (12)
k45 212k4 and P3 =
k45 2
9k4 . (21)
Moreover, P1 and P2 are determined by P3, through the traceless condition (12). These constraints turn Eqs. (16) and (19)
123
432 Page 4 of 7 Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :432
to the same expression:
e2( 2 + ) = 8G +
k45 2
string radius is related to such a scale by
0
12 . (22)
Now, we have two variables and one equation to solve, therefore it is necessary to impose an additional constraint. Fortunately, it is possible to link two of these variables by choosing a specic gauge [18], allowing for the imposition = . It implies
2 + = 8G +
k45 2
1 , (29)
while the string volumetric density is
4, (30)
both in Planck units. The parameter is estimated taking into account the string radius and considering that the string linear density is nearly the same in both curved and at space [16]. With these assumptions, we can simplify Eq. (28), while using Eq. (3) we get a relation for the effective linear density which depends on two parameters,
eff =
12 . (23)
Furthermore, the above assumption satises automatically the conservation equation (15). The general solution to the above equation is easy to obtain:
() = ln C1 sin
1 4G
1 + 4/21 4/2
1 cos
.
(31)
The gravitational and cosmological implications of cosmic strings are intimately related to its linear density. The above relation allows us to implement an observational restriction to the model. Data from the Planck collaboration have restricted the linear density of cosmic strings [4] as
eff 107, (32)
where we use G = c = 1 (Planck units). It constrains the
possible and values. As we can see in Fig. 1, for large values of we have the restriction 1.8104. For lower
values of (which implies the increasing of the braneworld effects) the restriction over becomes more accentuated.
We can specify the previous results for different types of strings. A string generated at grand unication theories (GUT) energy scales has GUT 104, while a string gen
erated during an electroweak phase transition has EW
1017 [3]. By xing these values, it is possible to obtain bounds over the brane tension for each type of string.
As we can see from Fig. 2, for lower values of the observational constraint is extrapolated. It implies a minimum value to the brane tension: if we assume the existence of GUT-strings in the brane scenario considered here, we need 3 1017. The same calculation for electroweak
strings leads to the constraint 2 1095. The restriction
due to GUT-strings is very strong. In fact, previous attempts to constrain the brane tension by astrophysical measurements have given less restrictive bounds [20,21].
3.2 The external solution
The external solution will determine the gravitational inuence of the strings in the spacetime, as lensing effects and
8G
1 4 2
C2
, (24)
where C1 and C2 are constants and
=
1
8G k45 212. (25)
If we assume a Minkowski spacetime in the limit 0,
it implies C1 = and C2 = 0. In this case, the internal
solution is
() = ln sin
, (26)
which is very similar to the GR solution for the same kind of string. The difference is due to the presence of a quadratic term in Eq. (25).
Once we have determined the internal spacetime of the string, we can compute the effective string linear density, obtained by integration of the string effective energy density over the transverse dimensions and :
eff =
2
0
0
+1 8G
112k45 2 sin
0
dd,
(27)
whose integration leads to
eff = 2 2 +
148G k45 22 1 cos
0
. (28)
Gauge strings have many of their properties determined by the scale parameter [19] of the broken gauge theory. The
123
Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :432 Page 5 of 7 432
From Eqs. (33) and (36) we have P3 = 43U and these two
equations become identical. Deriving Eq. (34) we obtain an expression for 13U + P 1, and by using Eqs. (34) and (35) it
is possible to nd the expressions for P1 and P2. Replacing these results in (37) we recover (33). Hence the conservation equation does not contribute with additional information over the system of equations and we have three equations to determine four variables. It renders the system undetermined.
We can rewrite Eq. (35) as a function of P1 and U:
e2( 2 + 2 ) =
5k4
3 U k4 P1. (38)
Equation (38), along with (33) and (34), sets up the system of equations to be solved. Unlike the internal solution, it is not easy to nd a general solution for the above system of equations. However, we need to impose another restriction over the variables in order to close the system of equations.
In the external case, the vacuum equations differ from GR only due to the E term. It carries information as regards the bulk curvature. We assume here that its inuence is very weak, or even negligible when compared with the energy scales of the internal solution, that is, E 0. It may
sound as an oversimplication, but we are just disregarding the nonlocal ve-dimensional KaluzaKlein wave effects in the exterior solution when contrasted to the short distance case performed by the interior solution. To the above system of equations, this is equivalent to impose a constant value to . It supplies us with the necessary constraint to solve the system, which leads to only one equation to solve:
2 + = 0, (39)
whose general solution is
(r) = ln(ar + b). (40)
In the current literature, solutions to the GR case where obtained by assuming b = 0. In this case we have the so-
called conical spacetime solution [12,13]. The constant a is related to the decit angle of the spacetime.
3.3 The junction conditions
It is necessary to match the internal and external solutions previously obtained. This can be done by imposing the well-known junction conditions [22]. The rst one is to require the same values for the metric components in both solutions, on the border (0 = r0) of the string:
g(i)(0) = g(e)(r0), (41)
Furthermore, the second matching condition says that the extrinsic curvature associated to both solutions needs to be
Fig. 1 Allowed values (shaded region) for and to a cosmic string in braneworld gravity, in Planck units
Fig. 2 String linear density to a GUT-string as a function of , in Planck units. The threshold dashed line denotes the observational constraint
structure formation seeds. To obtain an external solution we start with the same assumptions of the internal solution ( = = ). It will generate a static, cylindrically symmet
ric (endowed with Lorenz invariance in the z direction for the solution). The external vacuum equations obtained from (1), where T and vanish and E is given by (11), read
e2( 2 + + ) = k4U, (33) e2(2 + 2) =
k4
3 U + k4 P1, (34)
e2( 2 + 2 ) =
k4
3 U + k4 P2, (35)
e2( 2 + + ) =
k4
3 U + k4 P3. (36)
Furthermore, the conservation equation (15) becomes
13U + P 1 +
43U + P1(2 + ) P2 P3 = 0. (37)
123
432 Page 6 of 7 Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :432
the same on the border of the string,
K (i)(0) = K (e)(r0), (42)
where K is given by
K = hn. (43)
The above conditions imply the following constraints on the metric variables:
(0) = (r0), (44)
(0) = (r0). (45)
For the solutions obtained in the previous sections, it implies a constraint over the decit angle of the external solution,
a = cos
0
Fig. 3 Graphic of the decit angle in units of 2 as a function of . Notice that for high values there is no departure from the standard GR decit angle prediction
images by gravitational lensing, since the spacetime around the cosmic string produces divergent trajectories instead of convergent ones, as in conical spacetimes with a positive decit angle. Finally, as 0 the decit angle goes to
minus innity, but in view of the minimum, which is to be proportional to 4, arbitrary negative values to the decit angle are not expected rendering a well-dened anyway.
4 Conclusions
We have seen that the gravitational equations in a braneworld scenario differ from GR by the presence of two additional terms. It produces changes in the solution for the space-time generated by the cosmic string. We have assumed a cylindrically symmetric and static Weyl uid. It has allowed us to obtain a solution with such characteristics and then compare it with the GR solution. Yet the solution does not present Lorentz invariance in the z direction. Such a behavior emerges naturally in the GR solution [13]. In order to compare the solutions, we impose by hand the Lorentz symmetry. The result is a spacetime with conical geometry for the external solution and an effective string linear density differing from the Minkowski and GR predictions [2,12].
From the internal solution, it was possible to constrain the braneworld tension in order to satisfy the observational measurements from the Planck collaboration. By assuming the existence of cosmic strings generated by spontaneous symmetry breaking at the early universe, we were able to impose a physical constraint over . The value obtained is much stronger than the previous restrictions obtained in the literature.
Furthermore, we see that the decit angle of a cosmic string can be signicantly attenuated due to the braneworld gravitational corrections. It could explain the negative experimental results in the data of cosmic strings imprints based
. (46)
Equation (46) can be written in terms of the mass scale of the string and the brane tension,
a = cos 8G(1 4/2) . (47)
Therefore, the brane model predicts a decit angle ( =
2(1 a)) that differs from the usual GR case and the dif
ference depends on the relation between the cosmic string energy density, , and the parameter, the brane tension. The GR result is recovered in the limit, as expected.
Making use of Eq. (31), the constant a can also be expressed in terms of the effective energy density,
a = 1 4eff
1 4/21 + 4/2
, (48)
which is analogous to the result obtained in previous work for the GR case [12,13,23], but here there is a dependence on the brane effective gravity contributions represented by the brane tension .
The modications with respect to GR become relevant at low values of . In this case, the decit angle is attenuated, as can be read from Fig. 3. Particularly, for = 4/2, the
decit angle vanishes and it becomes impossible to observe any astrophysical and/or cosmological consequence due to the presence of local straight cosmic strings in the universe.
A particular effect occurs if < 4/2: the expression under the square root of (47) becomes negative and we have an imaginary number; in this case the trigonometric function becomes hyperbolic. Therefore, we have a conical spacetime with negative decit angle. It means that cosmic strings can produce standard effects as light deections and density perturbations in the universe, but they do not produce duplicated
123
Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75 :432 Page 7 of 7 432
upon , like lensing effects caused by the conical space-time generated by the cosmic string. We have shown that a particular value of the brane tension, = 4/2, makes the
decit angle vanishing and eliminates the possibility of lensing effects due to cosmic strings. Such a behavior has also consequences in other cosmological effects of cosmic strings, such as wake formation (overdensity in the matter distribution) by cosmic strings traveling in the universe [24,25], which strongly depends on the decit angle. These results provide us with a manner to distinguish the effects of cosmic strings in standard cosmology from the braneworld alternative scenarios. Moreover, an eventually negative decit angle would lead to a different density of created particles per mode, for instance, in a scenario as the one studied in Ref. [26]. The reason is that a negative decit angle can lead to a slightly different, but relevant, separation constant of the KleinGordon equation in the background generated by the cosmic string.
In order to nalize these remarks, we shall mention that the observational restriction on the string linear density is mostly obtained from calculations of cosmic string effects based on GR [4] (model dependent measurements). In view of the results obtained in this work, the brane tension can indeed play a relevant role in cosmic string gravitational effects.Hence we are compelled to explore genuine braneworld effects expecting relevant departures from GR studies.
Acknowledgments M. C. B. Abdalla and J. M. Hoff da Silva acknowledge Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientco e Tecnolgico (CNPq) for partial nancial support (482043/2011-3; 308623/2012-6).P. F. Carlesso thanks the CAPES-Brazil for supporting his doctorate studies.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecomm http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =ons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Funded by SCOAP3.
References
1. T.W.B. Kibble, Topology of cosmic domains and strings. J. Phys. A 9, 1387 (1976)
2. A. Vilenkin, E.P.S. Shellard, Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994)
3. M. Anderson, The Mathematical Theory of Cosmic Strings (Institute of Physics Publ, Bristol, 2003)
4. P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XXV. Searches for cosmic strings and other topological defects. Astron. Astrophys. 571, 21 (2014)
5. S. Sarangi, S.-H. Henry Tye, Cosmic string production towards the end of brane ination. Phys. Lett. B 536, 185 (2002)
6. N. Jones, H. Stoica, S.-H. Henry Tye, Brane interaction as the origin of ination. JHEP 07, 051 (2002)
7. J. Polchisnki, Cosmic superstrings revisited. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 20, 3413 (2005)
8. L. Randall, R. Sundrum, An alternative to compactication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690 (1999)
9. T. Shiromizu, K. Maeda, M. Sasaki, The Einstein equations on the 3-brane world. Phys. Rev. D 62, 043523 (2000)
10. A.N. Aliev, A.E. Gumrukcuoglu, Gravitational eld equations on and off a 3-brane world. Class. Q. Grav. 21, 5081 (2004)
11. R. Maartens, Brane world gravity. Liv. Rev. Relativ. 7, 7 (2004)12. J.R. Gott, Gravitational lensing effects of vacuum strings: exact results. Astrophys. J. 288, 422 (1985)
13. W.A. Hiscock, Exact gravitational eld of a string. Phys. Rev. D 31, 3288 (1985)
14. A. Herrera-Aguilar, A.M. Kuerten, Roldo da Rocha, Regular bulk solutions in brane-worlds with inhomogeneous dust and generalized dark radiation. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 359268 (2015)
15. H.B. Nielsen, P. Olesen, Vortex-line models for dual strings. Nuc. Phys. B 61, 45 (1973)
16. D. Garnkle, General relativistic strings. Phys. Rev. D 32, 1323 (1985)
17. N.K. Dadhich, R. Maartens, P. Papadopoulos, V. Rezania, Black holes on the brane. Phys. Lett. B 487, 1 (2000)
18. S. Chandrasekhar, J.L. Friedman, Astrophys. J. 175, 379 (1972)19. A. Vilenkin, Cosmic strings. Phys. Rev. D 24, 2082 (1981)20. C. Germani, R. Maartens, Stars in the braneworld. Phys. Rev. D 64, 124010 (2001)
21. R. Casadio, J. Ovalle, R. Rocha, Classical tests of general relativity: brane-world Sun from minimal geometric deformation. Europhys. Lett. 110, 40003 (2015)
22. W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity. Nuovo Cim. 44B, 1 (1939)
23. A. Vilenkin, Gravitational eld of vacuum domain walls and strings. Phys. Rev. D 23, 852 (1981)
24. J. Silk, A. Vilenkin, Cosmic strings and galaxy formation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1700 (1984)
25. T. Vachaspati, Cosmic strings and the large-scale structure of the universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1655 (1986)
26. J.M. Hoff da Silva, Roldo da Rocha, Shortcuts in particle production in a toroidal compactied spacetime. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 1853 (2007)
123
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
SIF and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Abstract
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae and/or non-USASCII text omitted; see image)
In this work we deal with the spacetime shaped by a straight cosmic string, emerging from local gauge theories, in the braneworld gravity context. We search for physical consequences of string features due to the modified gravitational scenario encoded in the projected gravitational equations. It is shown that cosmic strings in braneworld gravity may present significant differences when compared to the general relativity predictions, since its linear density is modified and the deficit angle produced by the cosmic string is attenuated. Furthermore, the existence of cosmic strings in that scenario requires a strong restriction to the braneworld tension: ......, in Planck units.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer