Article Info
Received : 01.08.2014
Accepted : 14.10.2014
Abstract
In this study, a novel soil analysis method for fertilization recommendation was developed and validated with 161 soil samples taken from Turkey - Çarsamba plain for determination of potassium as a plant nutrient. In conventional soil analysis methods, available potassium (K) nutrient was determined by ammonium acetate extraction with flame photometer. In this study an alternative to existing method was proposed by developing extraction solutions suitable for interference dynamics of ion selective electrodes in a flow injection setup. Flow injection analysis system was optimized and K ion concentration of 161 soil samples taken from Turkey - Çarsamba plain was determined with potentiometrically. For the same soil samples, K^sup +^ ion concentration was determined with ammonium acetate extraction using flame photometer in parallel. Fertilization recommendations for potassium was calibrated on ammonium acetate extraction based measurements. In order to evaluate available potassium nutrient analysis results from new generation soil analysis method in fertilization recommendation process, a correlation model is required for relating new generation method results to conventional method results. An artificial neural network based soft sensor system was developed for this task. Potentiometric K^sup +^ ion measurement of soil sample in flow injection analysis system was presented as input to soft sensor system. Soft sensor predicted available K in soil sample based on artificial neural network model which can be used in fertilizer recommendation. Prediction performance of soft sensor was validated with experimental data and fitted with high correlation coefficient (R2= 0.902). Experimental studies have shown that K determined by potentiometric measurements can be used in fertilization recommendations in Çarsamba plain by using soft sensor approach..
Keywords: soil analysis, fertilization recommendation, soft sensor, artificial neural network
© 2014 Federation of Eurasian Soil Science Societies. All rights reserved
(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.)
Introduction
Spectrophotometric devices such as flame photometer, ICP-OES (inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy) UV and AAS (atomic absorption spectrophotometer) are widely used in standard soil agricultural analysis that aimed at fertilizer recommendation. Advanced analysis devices like ICP-OES allow simultaneous measurement of different species from a single sample of soil extract (Bortolon et al., 2011). On the other hand these devices have considerably high initial investment and operating cost. In addition size and fragility of such devices makes transportation difficult thus makes their usage for on-field analysis unsuitable.
It is important for both economy and environmental health that fertilization recommendation is based on soil analysis so that required amount of fertilizer is determined precisely. A mobile soil analysis system that can give rapid results on the field can be a cost-effective solution. In present, agriculture technology has advanced to a new stage that usage of mobile soil analysis systems in precision agriculture is commercially viable.
Recently, electrochemical ion-selective electrodes (ISE) with benefits of low-cost, accuracy, easy utilization and transportable are studied as an alternative to conventional soil analysis methods (Sethuramasamyraja et al., 2008; Adamchuk et al., 2005; Adamchuk et al., 2004; Lobsey, 2010). There are various studies in literature showing that ion-selective electrodes can be utilized in soil analysis (Kim et al., 2007; Birrell et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2001; Ciesla, 2007).
The parameters required for fertilizer recommendation are available forms of nutrient elements required by crop, pH, salt and lime. Determination of these parameters depend on specific extraction and measurement methods which developed by field calibration studies specific to the local region. Any developed soil analysis method must be correlated with conventional soil analysis method in order to be utilized in fertilizer recommendation calculations. Correlation could be based on a linear model with a single correlation coefficient or a non-linear model for complex relation between traditional calibrated method and novel method.
In industrial processes, it is common that measurement of some of crucial process parameters exhibit difficulties such as high financial cost, significant delay in measurement. In some cases, there can be no hardware sensor for directly measuring primary process variable of interest. Soft sensors are employed to predict primary process variables by utilizing measurements of secondary variables and a mathematical model. Mathematical model can be formed by using first-principals or can be a data driven model. Data driven models depend on a soft computing techniques such as artificial neural networks, decision trees, fuzzy logic or support vector machines (Lin et al., 2007). Performance of a soft sensor mainly depends on selection of input variables and soft sensing model. Secondary variables that have been chosen as input to soft sensor must be related to the primary variable. Colinearity between input variables may deteriorate accuracy of soft sensor (Dufour et al., 2005) .In complex systems, soft sensing model structure must have adequate complexity for description of non-linear relationship between primary variable and soft sensor input variables.
In this study, a novel soil analysis method has been established by development of a flow injection analysis system using ion-selective electrodes as detector with appropriate extraction solutions. This analysis system can be used on-field for soil analysis and can provide a low cost solution for fertilizer recommendation procedures. Correlation model required between proposed analysis system and conventional soil analysis method has been established by soft sensor approach using an artificial neural network model. Soft sensor has been tested for measurement of available potassium and corresponding fertilizer recommendation.
Material and Methods
A total of 161 soil samples analyzed with conventional standard methods and developed soil analysis system. Input and output data set for training of soft sensor model was derived from obtained analysis results.
Sampling Points
Soils used in this study were gathered from Çarsamba plain which is located in city of Samsun, Turkey (Figure 1). A total of 161 soil samples from Çarsamba were selected to represent the diverse soil characteristics of important agricultural areas of Çarsamba and to provide a wide range of K concentration levels. Total area covered by sample coordinate points was 101131 hactare. Texture property distribution of collected samples was found to be 44% clay, 18% clay loam, 8% sandy clay loam, 3% sandy loam, 9% silt clay, 9% silt clay loam, 9% loam.
Soil samples were gathered from 0-20 cm of depth, and prepared for analysis by drying at room temperature (25 0C) and sieving with a 2 mm sieve.
Soil Extraction and Measuring
For conventional soil analysis, available potassium content was determined by mixing 1 N Ammonium acetate solution with soil sample and leaving for one night. This procedure was the same procedure employed in field calibration studies in that region. Output of this analysis results were used as target primary variable in building of soft sensor model.
Input variables of soft sensor were nutrition element content measured by ion-selective electrodes in flow-injection analysis system. Flow injection analysis system used in this study was developed in our research laboratory (Figure 2). Additionally, soil texture content, pH, EC and Lime were also used as input variables. In optimization of soft sensor model, a subset of these input variables was selected to improve performance.
In Figure 2, a mini circulation pump (Welco, WP100) provided continuous flow in the system. For sample injection a 3-way valve (The Lee Company) was used. As mentioned above, ion selective electrodes specific to 4 different nutrition element (K+, Ca+, NH4+, NO3-) were employed in detection unit. Sample holder was designed in-house and made of plexiglass. Data tracking and logging software was also developed in house. During measurement, sample injection was achieved by switching 3-way mini valve feeding port from baseline-solution (1) to sample container (2). After sample injection, peak heights were determined by software and converted to concentration by using calibration curve built from standard solutions
Since ion-selective electrodes operates in a limited pH range, an appropriate extraction solution was developed for the system. Developed extraction solution allowed simultaneous extraction of macro nutrient elements (K+, Ca+, NH4+, NO3-) in 13 minutes. Extraction parameters are given in Table 1. After extraction step, simultaneous measurement of nutrient elements was achieved with flow injection analysis system.
Prior to soil sample measurement, calibration curve was derived using standard solutions for K+, Ca+, NH4+, and NO3-.
Design of soft sensor model for K (potassium) fertilizer recommendation
Soft sensor model employed in the study was an artificial neural network (ANN) model. ANN model had a structure of multilayer feed forward network with a single hidden layer. Sigmoid function was used in hidden layer as the activation function. Back propagation algorithm was used in training of neural network model. In each training step, input vector was fed into neural network model. Output of neural network was calculated and compared with the expected target value. Back propagation algorithm tries to minimize the error between expected and output value by ANN model (Bishop et al., 1995).
Artificial neural network implementation of Weka (Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis) software package was used in the study. Weka is a collection of machine learning algorithms implemented as java class libraries (Hall et al., 2009). Matlab R2009a (Mathworks) is also used as a platform for calling Weka methods in different settings and drawing plots.
Evaluation of neural network model performance was based on coefficient of determination (R2) given by formula;
...
SQR is the sum of squares regressions and SQT is the sum of squared residuals. R2 values were calculated with ten-fold cross validation method. Data set was randomly divided into ten folds. Each fold was used for validation of neural network model while remainder data was used for training of neural network model. This procedure was repeated for each fold so that 10 different neural networks were developed. Outputs of these networks were averaged and used in calculation of R2 values which represents generalization performance of neural network model. Generalization is the ability of the neural network to predict outcome of unknown patterns. In training phase, training data is introduced to adjust internal weight structure of the network. Another validation data set is needed to test network's generalization ability. If the network produces acceptable predictions close to accuracy obtained in training phase, it is said to generalize well (Hastie et al., 2011).
An optimum subset of input vector set was determined by measuring performance of all possible combinations with a predefined neural network architecture. Input combinations were sorted according to calculated R2 values and 30 best combinations were taken into account for selection of variables. Frequency of each variables was determined and frequency with greater than 80 % were picked.
Number of neurons in the hidden layer, momentum value and learn-rate parameters of NN model was optimized by direct search method. Number of neurons in the hidden layer is related to the complexity of the neural network model. Momentum parameter determines update ratio of coefficients in each training step. Similarly, learning rate defines each input vector's singular impact on changing weight and bias coefficients of neural network structure. Finally, optimized neural network structure was used in calculation of fertilizer (K2SO4) recommendation for different plants. Relative error between measured potassium (K) and soft sensor measurement was calculated by;
...
Where yconventional denotes classic measurement, ysoft denotes soft sensor measurement.
Results and Discussion
Artificial neural network model approach is essentially a data driven method so appropriate selection of input variables is a very important step in developing the model. Number of total variables available for training was 10 so there were 210 = 1024 different combinations. A neural network model for each combination were developed with 8 neurons in the hidden layer, momentum of 0.3 and 0.1 learn rate.
Corresponding R2 values for each subset was calculated using cross-validation and 30 best combinations listed in Table 2.
Frequency of each variable were also presented. As anticipated, K -ISE measurement came out in all subsets. Calcium (Ca2+) also had a higher occurrence than other electrode measurements, namely NH4+ and NO3-. A threshold value of 80% were set and variables with frequency of 80% discarded. In soil property measurements only clay was selected. In summary, 7 of 10 variables (K+, Ca+, NH4+, NO3-, Clay, pH, EC) were chosen as soft sensor input variables (Table 3).
Optimization of neural network structure was accomplished by calculating R2 values for various parameters and picking the parameter set with highest R2. Momentum rate is varied between 0.1 and 0.4, learn rate was varied between 0.04 and 0.24, number of neurons in the hidden layer was varied between 2 and 14. Calculated R2 values for various learn rate and neuron count are presented in Figure 2.
Optimum point was found to be with 12 neurons in the hidden layer, momentum rate of 0.3 and learn-rate of 0.16. It was observed that for different learn-rate values, relatively highest R2 values were obtained with neural network models of 12 neurons in the hidden layer.
In Figure 3, relation between observed values and soft sensor prediction based on neural network model is illustrated. Calculated R2 value of 0.927 demonstrated that soft sensor approach provide reasonably reliable predictions.
Finally, validity of soft sensor results were demonstrated by utilizing soft sensor measurement results of available K in fertilizer recommendation and comparing to recommendations calculated with traditional soil analysis. Relative error in percentage was calculated by following formula
...
where fsof tsensor is fertilization recommendation for K calculated by soft sensor measurement and fconventional is fertilization recommendation calculated by traditional analysis method. In Figure 4 a,b,c relative error of fertilizer recommendation is given for tomato, potato and corn. For tomato and potato, mean of absolute relative error is found to be %2.2. Maximum of relative potassium fertilizer recommendation error for both of these plants were below %8 which indicated that soft sensor system exhibited excellent match with traditional analysis. For corn mean error was higher with a value of 6.8%. Although maximum absolute error was 58%, there were only 5 sample with errors higher than 20% therefore these results were also acceptable.
Conclusion
In this article, a soft sensor system composed of flow-injection analysis and artificial neural network model is presented in the context of its application in fertilizer recommendation. A full factorial approach was employed for selection of soft sensor inputs. Artificial neural network structure was also rigorously optimized. Both comparison of soft sensor outputs with reference laboratory results and potassium fertilizer recommendations based on outputs demonstrated that developed soft sensor system is a viable alternative to traditional soil analysis methods.
The significant benefit of developed system is the capability of getting rapid results on the field. Soft sensor models for predicting concentration of Ca 2+, NO3- and NH4+ can be developed in a similar manner, and proposed soil analysis system can be used for fertilizer recommendation of other nutrient elements.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by Chemistry and Material Research Department of Mir Arastirma ve Gelistirme A.S. and TUBITAK/TEYDEB (Project number: 3090664).
References
Adamchuk, V.I., Lund, E.D., Sethuramasamyraja, B., Morgan, M.T., Dobermann, A., Marx, D.B., 2005. Direct measurement of soil chemical properties on-the-go using ion-selective electrodes. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 48,272-294
Adamchuk, V.I., Hummel, J.W., Morgan, M.T., Upadhyaya, S.K., 2004. On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 44, 71-91
Birrell, S.J., Hummel, J.W., 2001. Real-time multi ISFET/FIA soil analysis system with automatic sample extraction. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 32, 45-67
Bishop, C.M., 1995. Neural Network for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press, 116p..
Bortolon, L., Gianello, C., Welter, S., Almeida, R.G.O., Giasson, E., 2011. Simultaneous extraction of phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium from soils and potassium recommendations for crops in southern brazil. Pedosphere 21(3), 365-372
Ciesla, J., Ryzak, M., Bieganowski, A., Tkaczyk, P., Walczak, R.T., 2007. Use of ion-selective electrodes for determination of content of potassium in egner-rhiem soil extracts. Research in Agricultural Engineering 53(1): 29-33
Dufour, P., Bhartiya, S., Dhurjati P. S., Francis J. Doyle III. 2005. Neural network-based software sensor: training set design and application to a continuous pulp digester. Control Engineering Practice 13: 135-143.
Eddy, S. and Johnston, S. R., 2009. Comparison of Palintest Soil Analysis to External Laboratory Analysis. Palintest Ltd
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten I. H. 2009. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update; SIGKDD Explorations, Volume 11, Issue 1.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., 2011. Element of statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction 2nd edition, page 38
Kim,H.J., Hummel, J.W., Sudduth, K.A., Motavalli, P.P., 2007. simultaneous analysis of soil macronutrients using ion-selective electrodes. Soil Science Society of America Journal 71: 1867-1877.
Lin, B., Recke, B., Knudsen J. K. H., Jørgense S. B., 2007. A systematic approach for soft sensor developmen t. Computers and Chemical Engineering 31: 419-425
Lobsey, C., Rossel, R. V., McBratney, A., 2010. An automated system for rapid in-field soil nutrient testing. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, 1 - 6 August 2010, Brisbane, Australia.
Sethuramasamyraja, B., Adamchuk, V.I., Dobermann, A., Marx, D.B., Jones, D.D., Meyer, G.E., 2008. Agitated soil measurement method for integrated on-the-go mapping of soil pH, potassium and nitrate contents. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 60: 212-225
Wang, J., Scott, A.D., 2001. Determination of exchangeable potassium in soil using ion-selective electrodes in soil suspensions. European Journal of Soil Science 52: 143-150.
Yue, X.L., Li, F., Hu, Y.C., Zhang, H.Z., Ji, H.J., Zhang, W.L., Schmidhalter, U., 2012. Evaluating The Validity Of A Nitrate Quick Test In Different Chinese Soils. Pedosphere 22(5): 623-630
Emel Eren a,*, Yalcin Öksüz a, Sevinç Karadag a, Selin Özen a,
Zafer Gemici a, Ridvan Kizilkaya b
a Mir Arastirma ve Gelistirme A.S., Istanbul, Turkey
b Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Samsun, Turkey
* Corresponding author.
Mir Arastirma ve Gelistirme A.S., Yildiz Technical University, Technopark, Davutpasa Campus, 34220, Istanbul, Turkey
Tel.: +902124837070 E-mail address: [email protected]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Federation of Eurasian Soil Science Societies (FESSS) 2014
Abstract
In this study, a novel soil analysis method for fertilization recommendation was developed and validated with 161 soil samples taken from Turkey-Carsamba plain for determination of potassium as a plant nutrient. In this study an alternative to existing method was proposed by developing extraction solutions suitable for interference dynamics of ion selective electrodes in a flow injection setup. Fertilization recommendations for potassium was calibrated on ammonium acetate extraction based measurements. In order to evaluate available potassium nutrient analysis results from new generation soil analysis method in fertilization recommendation process, a correlation model is required for relating new generation method results to conventional method results. An artificial neural network based soft sensor system was developed for this task. Soft sensor predicted available K in soil sample based on artificial neural network model which can be used in fertilizer recommendation. Experimental studies have shown that K determined by potentiometric measurements can be used in fertilization recommendations in Carsamba plain by using soft sensor approach.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer