Differential Toll-Like Receptor-Signalling of Burkholderia pseudomallei Lipopolysaccharide in Murine and Human Models

Abstract

The Gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei causes melioidosis and is a CDC category B bioterrorism agent. Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 impairs host defense during pulmonary B.pseudomallei infection while TLR4 only has limited impact. We investigated the role of TLRs in B.pseudomallei-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced inflammation. Purified B.pseudomallei-LPS activated only TLR2-transfected-HEK-cells during short stimulation but both HEK-TLR2 and HEK-TLR4-cells after 24 h. In human blood, an additive effect of TLR2 on TLR4-mediated signalling induced by B.pseudomallei-LPS was observed. In contrast, murine peritoneal macrophages recognized B.pseudomallei-LPS solely through TLR4. Intranasal inoculation of B.pseudomallei-LPS showed that both TLR4-knockout(^-/-) and TLR2x4^-/-, but not TLR2^-/- mice, displayed diminished cytokine responses and neutrophil influx compared to wild-type controls. These data suggest that B.pseudomallei-LPS signalling occurs solely through murine TLR4, while in human models TLR2 plays an additional role, highlighting important differences between specificity of human and murine models that may have important consequences for B.pseudomallei-LPS sensing by TLRs and subsequent susceptibility to melioidosis.

About the Authors:

Tassili A. F. Weehuizen

* E-mail: [email protected] (TAFW); [email protected] (WJW)

Affiliations Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Joann L. Prior

Affiliation: Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom

Thomas W. van der Vaart

Affiliations Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Sarah A. Ngugi

Affiliation: Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, United Kingdom

Sergey A. Nepogodiev

Affiliation: John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, United Kingdom

Robert A. Field

Affiliation: John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, United Kingdom

Liesbeth M. Kager

Affiliations Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Cornelis van ‘t Veer

Affiliations Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Alex F. de Vos

Affiliations Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

W. Joost Wiersinga

* E-mail: [email protected] (TAFW); [email protected] (WJW)

Affiliations Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Introduction

The category B bioterrorism agent, as classified by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Burkholderia pseudomallei is a facultative intracellular Gram-negative bacterium and the causative agent of melioidosis [1–3]. Melioidosis, an important cause of sepsis in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia, is characterized by pneumonia and the formation of multiple abscesses and is associated with case fatality rates of up to 40% despite appropriate antibiotic treatment [1, 2]. Among the multiple putative virulence factors that have been described for B.pseudomallei, such as Burkholderia lethal factor 1, type III and VI secretion systems, capsular polysaccharide and flagella, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stands out for its omnipresence and the high antibody titers which are generated against it in patients [4, 5]. Yet, in contrast to other Gram-negative pathogens, the LPS of B.pseudomallei is considered only weakly inflammatory [6]. In general LPS, which consists of lipid A, the core-oligosaccharide and the outer O-polysaccharide, plays an important role in cell integrity and in signalling to the host innate immune response [7, 8].

There are several lines of evidence that suggest an important role for LPS in the pathogenesis of melioidosis. First, high levels of antibodies to LPS are associated with a better outcome in patients with melioidosis suggesting that LPS needs to be recognized for an appropriate immune response [4, 5]. In addition, the B.pseudomallei mutant strain SRM117 lacking an O-antigen is less virulent in animal models utilising hamsters, guinea pigs and diabetic rats when compared to the parent strain. This might be caused by the reduced resistance to opsonization, rendering the bacterium more susceptible to killing by macrophages and neutrophils [9–12]. Furthermore, administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) specifically directed against LPS of B.pseudomallei proved to be protective in a murine model of inhalational melioidosis [13, 14]. However, the LPS of B.pseudomallei is reported to be less immunostimulatory in comparison to LPS derived from pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae [6]. In addition, systemic LPS levels at admission do not correlate with outcome in patients with melioidosis [15, 16].

In general the structure of the lipid A moiety of LPS is well conserved between strains and its presence sensed by the Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 complex upon which the immune response is initiated [8]. While adequate cellular recognition of LPS can aid in the clearance of the invading pathogen, overstimulation of host cells by LPS can lead to septic shock. However, not all Gram-negative bacteria produce LPS that can be recognized by the TLR4/MD2 complex, possibly as a result of their non-hexa-acyl lipid A structure [8, 17]. For instance, Porphyromonas gingivalis-LPS contains multiple lipid A species that functionally interact with both TLR2 and TLR4 and Leptospiral LPS is predominantly recognized by TLR2 [18, 19].

Conflicting evidence exists regarding whether the LPS of B.pseudomallei signals through TLR2 or TLR4. We previously reported that a LPS compound derived from B.pseudomallei strain 1026b extracted by the hot aqueous-phenol method [20] was recognized by TLR2 and not TLR4 in Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK293) cells stably transfected with CD14, CD14-TLR2, or CD14-TLR4/MD-2 [21]. In contrast, purified LPS derived from strain K96243 was shown to signal through TLR4 using the same in vitro model [22]. However, the in vivo role of TLR recognition of B.pseudomallei- LPS has not yet been investigated.

In the present study we aimed to investigate the importance of LPS as a virulence factor of B.pseudomallei and the contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 in B.pseudomallei- LPS induced inflammation. We found that LPS of B.pseudomallei induces a strong inflammatory response. Moreover, we established that TLR4 is the main receptor for LPS of B.pseudomallei in murine in vitro and in vivo models. Remarkably, in human in vitro models TLR2 plays an additional role in B.pseudomallei- LPS-signalling.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and purification of LPS

LPS was extracted from B.pseudomallei 1026b and purity was confirmed using a combination of previously published methods [23, 24]. Cell pellets of to log-phase grown B. pseudomallei 1026b were digested for 16 hours at 4°C with 15,000 Units of lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) per mg of bacteria, prior to digestion with 20 μg/ml of DNase I and RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich) for a further 16 h at room temperature. This was followed by a Proteinase K (Sigma-Aldrich) (50mg/ml) digestion step for 6 hours at room temperature. The LPS was then treated by a modified hot phenol method. Briefly, the cell paste and 90% phenol (Sigma-Aldrich) were independently heated to 70°C before adding the phenol to the cell paste at a 1:1 ratio. The mixture was vigorously stirred by hand whilst maintaining 70°C. This mixture was dialysed against water until no phenol remained, after which it was lyophilised. A further round of Proteinase K, DNase I and RNase A digestions preluded a final ultracentrifugation step at 100,000 x g for 3 hours. Pellets were solubilised with distilled water before being dialysed into further distilled water. The final product was purified by SDS-PAGE on a 12.5% separating gel and visualised by silver staining.

Protein contamination in the LPS preparation was tested by silver staining, Coomassie blue staining (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and BCA assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL). In order to further confirm the purity of the LPS, different concentrations of LPS-binding cationic antimicrobial polymyxin B (PMB) [25, 26] were used in a stimulation assay using the murine alveolar macrophage cell line MH-S (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD).

Isolation and mass spectrometric analysis of lipid A

Lipid A components of B.pseudomallei-LPS of strains 1026b and K96243 [27] were obtained by treatment of LPS as described [20]. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) of the lipid A component of B.pseudomallei-LPS of strains 1026b and K96243 was performed in negative-ion mode on a Bruker UltraFlex MALDI-TOF/TOF instrument using 2,4,6-trihydroxyacetophenon as a matrix. Sample preparation and analysis were conducted as described [28].

Cells and cell culture conditions

HEK-293 cells stably expressing human CD14-TLR2 or CD14-TLR4/MD2 (kindly provided by Dr. Douglas Golenbock, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts) were used as described previously [21]. HEK-293 cells were cultured in DMEM medium enriched with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% PenStrep (100 units penicillin, 100 ug streptomycin; Life technologies, Bleiswijk, the Netherlands) and blasticidine (10 ug/ml: InvivoGen San Diego, CA). HEK-cells were seeded at 2.5 x 10⁵ /ml and stimulated with LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b (100 ng/ml), ultrapure LPS of Escherichia coli O111:B4 (100 ng/ml: InvivoGen), PAM3CSK4 (100 ng/ml, InvivoGen) or medium for 6 or 24 hours. Supernatants were harvested and stored at -20°C until assayed for interleukin (IL)-8.

In additional experiments, lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to HEK-cells during LPS stimulation. The murine alveolar macrophage cell line MH-S was grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 1% L-glutamine, 1% PenStrep and 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) and seeded at 1.5 x10⁶/ml, followed by stimulation with the stimuli as described above in the presence or absence of LPS-binding polymyxin B (25–100 ug/ml; Sigma-Aldrich). Supernatants were harvested at 6 and 24 h and stored at -20°C until assayed for murine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. For selected experiments whole blood derived from healthy volunteers was collected; for these studies inhibitory anti-human TLR2 (2500 ng/ml) and TLR4 (1000 ng/ml) antibodies were used (InvivoGen) as described [29]. Dose-response curves were performed prior to electing the appropriate dose of each stimulus and for the different cells used (data not shown).

Mice and murine ex vivo stimulation experiments

TLR2 deficient (TLR2^-/-) and TLR4^-/- mice were kindly provided by Dr Shizuo Akira (Osaka University, Japan) and were backcrossed at least six times to a C57BL/6 background. TLR2^-/-/TLR4^-/- double knock-out (TLR2x4^-/-) mice were generated by intercrossing TLR2^-/- and TLR4^-/- mice [30]. Pathogen-free wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River (Maastricht, the Netherlands). Age (10–12 week) and sex-matched animals were used in all experiments.

Blood and peritoneal macrophages were harvested from WT, TLR2^-/- and TLR4^-/- mice. Blood was then transferred to V-bottom 96-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany; 100 ul/well) and directly stimulated with 10⁷ CFU/ml of heat-killed B. pseudomallei 1026b or its O-antigen lacking mutant SRM117 [9, 11], LPS of B. pseudomallei 1026b (100 ng/ml), LPS of E. coli (100 ng/ml), PAM3CSK4 (100 ng/ml) or RPMI 1640 for 6 h or 24 h. Peritoneal macrophages were harvested by 5 ml peritoneal lavage with sterile PBS. Cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 enriched with 1% L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 10% FCS and seeded in a 96-well plate at a concentration of 0.5 x 10⁶ /ml and. The next day the cells were washed with RPMI 1640 to remove non-adherent cells and incubated with the same stimuli as used for whole blood; a MOI of 50 of heat-killed B. pseudomallei 1026b and SRM117 was used. Dose-response curves for these stimuli were performed prior to these experiments (data not shown).

LPS-induced lung inflammation

Lung inflammation was induced in mice as described previously [31]. In short, mice were lightly anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane, after which 50 μl of LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b (200 ug/ml) dissolved in PBS was administered intranasally. This dose of 10 μg LPS intranasally was based on a previous dose-finding experiment (data not shown). After 6 h, mice were sacrificed by bleeding from the vena cava inferior. Bronchoalveolar lavage with two 0.5 ml aliquots of sterile saline was performed as described [31]. The 6 h time point was chosen as the ideal time to simultaneously assess cyto- and chemokine alterations and leukocyte recruitment [31]. BAL fluid (BALF) differential cell counts were performed on Giemsa-stained cytospin preparations. After centrifuging the BALF samples at 650x g for 10 minutes, supernatants were harvested and stored at -20°C for cytokine analysis.

Assays

Human IL-8 levels were measured in the supernatants of HEK-cell supernatant by ELISA (Biosource, Etten-Leur, the Netherlands). Release of TNF–α, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemo-attractant (KC) was measured in supernatant and BALF by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. Cell counts in BALF were determined using a Beckman Coulter Counter (Miami, United States).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism for Windows (version 5.01; GraphPad Software). Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. When > 2 groups were treated with the same stimuli, a Kruskall-Wallis test was performed first. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM values. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethics and safety statement

The Animal Care and Use of Committee of the University of Amsterdam approved all experiments, which were conducted according to national guidelines (DIX 102324/25). Mice were sacrificed under ketamine (Eurovet, Bladel, the Netherlands) and medetomine (Pfizer, Capelle, Netherlands) or isoflurane anesthesia, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering. In addition, the biosafety committee of the University of Amsterdam approved all in vitro experiments.

Results

Extraction and purity of B.pseudomallei-LPS

To ensure that the LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b was not degraded after extraction, 5 μg of LPS (0.5 mg/ml) was run on a 12.5% gel and silver-stained, which demonstrated a typical LPS pattern [32, 33] (Fig 1A) and no protein contamination. In addition, the LPS was assessed for protein contamination by an enhanced BCA assay and Coomassie Blue staining (Fig 1B) which were negative (data not shown). Even though B.pseudomallei itself is not or just slightly growth-inhibited by its presence [34], PMB was able to completely inhibit the inflammatory response induced by 50 μg/ml of purified B.pseudomallei- LPS in the murine alveolar cell line MH-S (Fig 1C). Of note, PMB by itself did not have an effect on MH-S cell viability, neither did it have any effect of the inflammatory response caused by PAM3CSK4, a synthetic TLR2-ligand (data not shown). These results underscore that there are no potential immune stimulatory contaminating agents present in the LPS preparation used.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 1. Successful extraction and purification of B.pseudomallei-LPS.

LPS from B.pseudomallei 1026b was purified by a modified hot phenol-water extraction method including proteinase K treatment. 10 μl of LPS (0.5 mg/ml) was fractionated by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis followed by silver staining (A) which showed the characteristic ladder pattern of LPS banding of Gram-negative bacteria, without any indications of protein contamination (detection limit of 0.5–5 ng) and Coomassie blue staining (B) which demonstrated no protein contamination as well (detection limit 50 ng). Contamination of the extracted LPS was also assessed by the addition of LPS-binding Polymyxin B (PMB) (C). For this purpose, the murine alveolar macrophage cell line MH-S was stimulated with RPMI 1640 medium [56], LPS of E. coli 0111:B4 or B.pseudomallei 1026b and incubated with increasing concentrations of PMB for 6h, followed by TNF-α measurement in the supernatant. Results are representative for three independent experiments. (M = ladder, B.ps = B.pseudomallei-LPS)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.g001

Since it is known that the structure of the lipid A component of LPS is of importance recognition by TLRs [35], the isolated lipid A components of B.pseudomallei strains 1026b and K96243 were structurally analyzed by MALDI TOF mass spectrometry. As expected, the analyses revealed a high degree of heterogeneity of these isolates, which gave spectra that were very similar (S1 Fig). We confirmed that the lipid A species in the LPS of both B. pseudomallei K96234 and B. pseudomallei 1026b were predominantly tetra-acylated with a small proportion that were penta-acylated (Table 1, S1 and S2 Figs), which is in line with previous studies [16]

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 1. The main MALDI-TOF-MS negative-ion peaks of lipid A component of B. pseudomallei 1026b and their proposed interpretation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.t001

B.pseudomallei-LPS functionally interacts with both human TLR2 and -4

In order to investigate via which TLR the LPS of B.pseudomallei signals, we first stimulated HEK-293 cells stably transfected with either human CD14-TLR2 or CD14-TLR4/MD2. In line with our previous experiments we confirmed that after 6 h of stimulation B.pseudomallei-LPS signals via TLR2 and not TLR4 in this cell system [21] (Fig 2A). However, after 24 hours of stimulation the LPS of B.pseudomallei clearly interacted with both TLR2 and TLR4 (Fig 2B). To examine the signalling more carefully, we next performed the reverse experiment using human whole blood derived from healthy volunteers in combination with inhibitory anti-human TLR2 or TLR4 antibodies. After pre-incubation with an anti-TLR2 or anti-TLR4 antibody, we stimulated whole blood with B.pseudomallei-LPS (100 ng/ml) for 6 h. In concordance with the experiments with HEK-cells, these experiments demonstrated that B.pseudomallei-LPS signals mainly via TLR4 in a human in vitro system (Fig 2C). Interestingly, anti-TLR2 antibody tended to reduce the inflammatory response, but this was not significant (p = 0.09). However, combining the anti-TLR2/4 antibodies did demonstrate an additional effect of TLR2 blockade. With regard to the inflammatory response induced by the whole bacterium, we did not observe any inhibitory effect on the inflammatory response induced by B.pseudomallei when these antibodies were used (data not shown). In all experiments, E.coli-LPS, used as positive control, was confirmed to signal only through TLR4. In addition, these results showed that the extent of cytokine responses induced by B.pseudomallei-LPS was comparable to those induced by E.coli-LPS.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 2. LPS of B.pseudomallei signals via both TLR2 and TLR4 in in vitro human models.

Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK)-293 cells, stably transfected with either CD14-TLR2 or CD14-TLR4/MD2 were stimulated with purified LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b (100 ng/ml), LPS of E. coli 0111:B4 (100 ng/ml), PAM3CSK4 (100 ng/ml) or DMEM+ 10% FCS for 6h (A) or 24h (B) before measurement of interleukin (IL)-8 in the supernatant (n = 3). Human whole blood was pre-treated for 30 minutes with respectively RPMI 1640 medium, anti-TLR2 antibody (2500 ng/ml), anti-TLR4 antibody (1000 ng/ml) or both antibodies and hereafter stimulated with purified LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b (100 ng/ml), LPS of E. coli 0111:B4 (100 ng/ml), PAM3CSK4 (100 ng/ml) or RPMI 1640 for 6h after which TNF was measured (C) (n = 3). An additive effect of TLR2 on TLR4 mediated signalling induced by B.pseudomallei-LPS was observed. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Results of two or three independent experiments were pooled. Mann-Whitney- U tests were performed. *P< 0.05; **P< 0.01, ***P< 0.001 vs. control (or no antibodies). ^‡ P< 0.05 anti-TLR2 and 4 vs. anti-TLR4 alone.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.g002

TLR4 –but not TLR2—deficiency attenuates the murine cellular inflammatory response to B.pseudomallei-LPS

After demonstrating the important role of both TLR2 and TLR4 in the signalling of B.pseudomallei-LPS in human cell models, we next examined the TLR-signalling in an ex vivo murine model. Whole blood and primary peritoneal macrophages harvested from WT, TLR2^-/- and TLR4^-/- mice were collected and stimulated with B.pseudomallei-LPS, heat-killed B.pseudomallei and its mutant SRM117 that lacks the O-antigen for 6 and 24 h. In this model, B.pseudomallei-LPS behaved in the same way as E. coli-LPS: TLR4^-/- but not TLR2^-/- murine whole blood (Fig 3A) and peritoneal macrophages (Fig 3B) showed a completely abolished TNF-α response upon stimulation. Interestingly, reduced TNF-α release was observed in whole blood derived from TLR4^-/- but not TLR2^-/- mice in response to both heat-killed B.pseudomallei and the SRM117 mutant (Fig 3A). Surprisingly, stimulation of TLR2^-/- peritoneal macrophages with heat-killed B.pseudomallei demonstrated an equally hampered response as TLR4 deficient macrophages (Fig 3B). An even more remarkable finding was that this TLR-2-mediated response was O-antigen-dependent since it differed from the response to stimulation with mutant strain SRM117. Despite being less virulent in animal models [9], B. pseudomallei mutant SRM117 induced a similar inflammatory response in WT blood and macrophages.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 3. LPS of B.pseudomallei signals solely via murine TLR4.

Murine whole blood (A) and peritoneal macrophages (B) harvested from wild-type (WT), TLR2^-/- and TLR4^-/- mice were stimulated for 24h with RPMI 1640 + 10% FCS medium, LPS of E. coli 0111:B4 (100 ng/ml), LPS of B.pseudomallei (100 ng/ml), heat-killed B.pseudomallei 1026b (100 ng/ml), or its O-antigen lacking mutant SRM117 (both 10⁷ CFU/ml) before measurement of murine TNF-α (n = 4). Following a Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed. Data are means ± SEM. Results are representative of two or three independent experiments. *P< 0.05 vs. WT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.g003

In a separate set of experiments whole blood and peritoneal macrophages derived from TLR2/4 double knock-out mice were exposed to B.pseudomallei- LPS; however no additional effect of TLR2 or double TLR deficiency was observed in the inflammatory response (data not shown). Taken together, this set of experiments showed that–in sharp contrast to the human studies—B.pseudomallei-LPS interacts with TLR4 and not TLR2 in ex vivo murine models.

TLR4 acts as the main TLR receptor for neutrophil recruitment during acute murine lung inflammation induced by B.pseudomallei-LPS

We have previously shown that intranasal inoculation with B.pseudomallei causes significant and rapid inflammation and neutrophil, but not monocyte, recruitment toward the lung [36]. To evaluate the role of B.pseudomallei-LPS during pulmonary inflammation, we intranasally inoculated WT, TLR2^-/-, TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice with B.pseudomallei-LPS to examine polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) influx. BALF was obtained 6 h after LPS administration since this time point is representative for both neutrophil influx and local cytokine/chemokine release. No differences in pulmonary neutrophil influx were seen between WT and TLR2^-/- mice (Fig 4). However, when compared to WT mice, B.pseudomallei LPS-induced PMN influx was equally and strongly reduced in TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice (Fig 4).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 4. B.pseudomallei- LPS-induced neutrophil influx is dependent on TLR4 in mice.

Wild-type (WT), TLR2^-/-, TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice were inoculated intranasally with 10 ug LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b and analysed 6h later for lung neutrophil influx in bronchoalveolar fluid (BALF) (A). Representative Giemsa stained BALF slides are shown of WT, TLR2^-/-, TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice obtained 6h post-LPS administration (magnification 20x) (B). Following a Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed. Data are presented as means ± SEM. Results of two independent experiments were pooled (n = 16 per group). ***P< 0.001 vs. WT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.g004

B.pseudomallei-LPS induced pulmonary inflammation in mice is TLR4 dependent

Intranasal administration of B.pseudomallei-LPS resulted in a steep increase in the concentrations of TNF-α and IL-6 in BALF (Fig 5A and 5B). TLR4, but not TLR2, did profoundly influence this characteristic inflammatory response. B.pseudomallei-LPS induced TNF-α and IL-6 levels determined 6 h after administration were found to be significantly lower in TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice, but not in TLR2^-/- mice when compared to WT mice (Fig 5A and 5B). Of note, TLR2 deficiency resulted in increased IL-6 levels when compared to WT; however no additional effect of TLR2 was seen in the TLR2x4^-/- mice when compared to the TLR4^-/- mice. In correlation with the strongly diminished neutrophil influx in TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice, an equally sharp decline in the production of the neutrophil attracting chemokine KC in BALF was seen (Fig 5C). These findings further confirm our conclusion that TLR4 acts as the main in vivo receptor for B.pseudomallei-LPS in mice.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Fig 5. TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/-, but not TLR2^-/- mice, display diminished cytokine responses to B.pseudomallei LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation in mice.

mTNF-α (A), interleukin (IL)-6 (B) and KC (C) levels were determined in bronchoalveolair fluid (BALF) of wild-type (WT), TLR2^-/-, TLR4^-/- and TLR2x4^-/- mice 6h post-intranasal administration of 10 ug LPS of B.pseudomallei. Following a Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U-tests were performed. Data are presented as means ± SEM. N = 7 or 9 per group and experiments were performed in duplicate. *** P< 0.001 vs. WT.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.g005

Discussion

LPS recognition by the host is of crucial importance for the initiation of a swift host immune response to Gram-negative bacteria [37]. In the case of melioidosis, a main cause of community-acquired Gram-negative sepsis in Southeast Asia and Northern Australia however, essential insights on both the role of LPS as a putative virulence factor and its recognition by the innate immune system remain ill defined [1, 2]. We now studied the recognition and contribution of TLR2 and TLR4 in B.pseudomallei-LPS induced inflammation, linking in vitro experiments using human and murine cells with mouse studies involving LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation. Using these models we found that the LPS of B.pseudomallei induces a strong inflammatory response that is comparable to the response elicited by E.coli-LPS, supporting previous data [38]. Moreover, we established that TLR4 is the main receptor for LPS of B.pseudomallei in murine in vitro and in vivo models. Remarkably, in human in vitro models TLR2 has an additional role in the recognition of B.pseudomallei-LPS. Taken together these results further characterize B.pseudomallei-LPS as a key driver of the innate immune response in melioidosis. In addition, these findings underscore important species differences in the specificity of LPS-TLR interactions, which means caution should be applied when generalizations are made when extrapolating from murine disease models to humans [39].

TLRs and CD14 are key pattern-recognition receptors of the innate immune system that are capable of recognizing ‘pathogen-associated molecular patterns’ (PAMPs) and form a crucial link between innate and adaptive immunity. The key role of TLRs in the pathogenesis of melioidosis is underscored by the finding that mice deficient in myeloid-differentiation-primary-response-gene-88 (MyD88), which is the key signalling adaptor protein for all TLRs, except for TLR3, show a strongly accelerated lethality upon intranasal infection with B.pseudomallei [40]. TLR4 has been implicated as the canonical LPS-receptor for Gram-negative bacteria, recognizing the lipid A part of LPS [41]. Efficient LPS signalling requires both the LPS-binding protein (LBP) and the surface-anchored receptor CD14, which has demonstrated to be involved in the recognition of B.pseudomallei [42]—and the extracellular protein MD2. Furthermore, the glycosylation status of LPS influences its signalling; smooth LPS, which contains the complete O-antigen, requires CD14 for its detection, whereas the O-antigen lacking rough LPS and lipid A do not [43]. B.pseudomallei-LPS seems to be largely conserved across this species. LPS profiling of >700 B.pseudomallei isolates using SDS-PAGE showed that most isolates had a ‘typical’ ladder pattern of extracted LPS while a minority had an ‘atypical’ or rough pattern [44]. B.pseudomallei-LPS diversity may correlate with differential immunopathogenicity and virulence, such as biofilm formation among B.pseudomallei strains [32, 45]. Observed differences in TLR-signalling of LPS might further be explained by different three-dimensional shapes of the lipid A part [46], which are due to a different disaccharide backbone, the presence or absence of carboxyl or phosphate groups, numbers and (non)symmetrical position of acyl-groups [47]. Conical shaped lipid A such as that of E.coli signals via TLR4, while cylindrical shaped lipid A has been described to signal via TLR2 [46]. B.pseudomallei’s lipid A is known to be penta-acylated, while the lipid A part of most other virulent Gram-negative bacteria often possesses 6 acyl groups, and contains a fatty acyl mutation (C_14:0(2-OH) [16]. In our study we found similar acylation patterns for the lipid A part of both B. pseudomallei 1026b and K96243, making it less likely that TLR signalling of LPS differs between these B.pseudomallei strains. A role for TLR2 in the recognition of B.pseudomallei-LPS would not be unique: it is known that the LPS of Legionella pneumophila, Leptospira interrogans and Porphyromonas gingivalis can signal via TLR2 [8, 18, 19]. Remarkably, the TLR2-mediated response was O-antigen-dependent since it differed from the response to stimulation with the O antigen mutant strain SRM117. One could hypothesize that differences in the recognition of smooth LPS (which includes O-antigen) and rough LPS (which lacks O-antigen) may play a role herein. Another explanation might be that O-antigen deficiency leads to changes in the expression of other B. pseudomallei associated PAMPs and thus TLR ligands.

We now demonstrate that, depending on the model used, B.pseudomallei-LPS recognition occurs solely via TLR4 (murine models) or via a combination of TLR2 and -4 (human models. Our results underscore previous studies that have demonstrated important differences in TLR-signalling in humans and mice [48, 49]. Moreover, in a study on Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and cystic fibrosis (CF) it has been shown that P. aeruginosa adapts itself to the CF airway by synthesizing both hexa- and penta-acylated LPS. Human TLR4 can discriminate between these LPS-forms, whereas murine TLR4 cannot [50]. This is thought to be mediated by an 82-aa region of human TLR4 that varies highly across species [50]. Using mass spectrometry, we confirmed that lipid A of B.pseudomallei has a tetra- and penta-acylated saccharide backbone, which could be the reason the TLR4 response to B.pseudomallei-LPS is much stronger in mice than in humans. In this respect it should be mentioned that TLR4-region genetic variants in humans are associated with susceptibility to melioidosis [51]. Of note however, this effect could also be attributed to a non-LPS TLR4 effect, since this promiscuous receptor not only recognizes LPS but also recognizes numerous endogenous danger signals called ‘danger-associated molecular patterns’ (DAMPs) [52].

Pneumonia is the most common manifestation of acute melioidosis [1, 53]. Our study is, to our knowledge, the first to provide insights into the ability of B.pseudomallei- LPS to elicit broncho-alveolar inflammation. We demonstrated that B.pseudomallei- LPS elicits a profound inflammatory response, comparable to that induced by instillation of an equal dose of E.coli-LPS [31]. B.pseudomallei-LPS induced the release of TNF-α, IL-6 and KC into BALF together with a marked influx of neutrophils into the alveolar space. Together with our in vitro data that show that the extent of cytokine responses induced by B.pseudomallei-LPS was comparable to those induced by E.coli-LPS, these results challenge current views that B.pseudomallei-LPS is only weakly inflammatory, which is in line with recent reports [38]. This effect was dependent on TLR4. TLR2 deficiency did not play a role in murine LPS recognition: either TLR2 deficiency on its own or TLR2/TLR4 double deficiency did not significantly influence these inflammatory parameters.

Our study has several limitations. Potential contamination with TLR2-stimulating agents such as lipopeptides is a well-known problem during LPS purification [54]. The LPS of B.pseudomallei used in this study was obtained by a modified aequous hot-phenol re-extraction method and we have confirmed its integrity and purity by both silver and Coomassie staining and a BCA protein assay. To further test potential contamination, in supplementary experiments, we studied whether digestion of B.pseudomallei LPS with lipoprotein lipase (LPL) could abolish the response in HEK-TLR2 cells; however LPL treatment did not impact on TLR-signalling by B.pseudomallei-LPS (S3 Fig). No TLR2 dependent response was observed in the murine in vitro stimulation experiments. In addition, the LPS-binding antimicrobial PMB was able to completely inhibit the inflammatory response induced by the purified B.pseudomallei-LPS. It has been demonstrated that TLR signalling might differ in established cell lines and primary cells [55]; this can be of particular relevance for our observation of B.pseudomallei- LPS—TLR2 signalling when using a TLR overexpressing system of HEK-cells. However, when we performed the reverse experiment on human whole blood with the use of blocking TLR antibodies we still observed a significant effect of TLR2 on the signalling of B.pseudomallei-LPS. Lastly, it should be noted that TLR expression is known to vary considerably across mammalian species [49]. Murine and human inflammatory responses towards LPS stimulation can be markedly different [39]. Our study now further accentuates the implications of these findings.

In summary, we here demonstrate that LPS of B.pseudomallei is capable of inducing a strong inflammatory response in both human and murine models underscoring an important role for LPS as a virulence factor of B.pseudomallei. We conclude that the main receptor of B.pseudomallei-LPS is TLR4. However, in human ex vivo models there is an additional role of TLR2 in the signalling of B.pseudomallei-LPS. These data emphasize species differences in TLR-signalling in men and mice and clearly imply that extrapolation of murine data to humans should be carried out with great caution. Future research on these species discrepancies is therefore needed.

Supporting Information

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

S1 Fig. Negative-ion mode MALDI-TOF mass spectra of lipid A components of B. pseudomallei 1026b (A) and K96243 (B).

Based on peaks in these spectra and comparison to literature data [16] acylation patterns of lipid A were proposed (Table 1). The spectra of the observed negative-ion peaks were similar for both strains. (m/z) = mass-to-charge ratio. Da = dalton.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Calculated m/z values for proposed structures of substituted lipid A backbone.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Lipoprotein lipase treatment does not significantly alter TLR-2 signalling of B.pseudomallei-LPS.

Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK)-293 cells, stably transfected with either CD14-TLR2 or CD14-TLR4/MD2 were stimulated with purified LPS of B.pseudomallei 1026b (100 ng/ml), LPS of E. coli 0111:B4 (100 ng/ml), PAM3CSK4 (100 ng/ml) or DMEM+ 10% FCS. Subsequently, lipoprotein lipase (200 or 2000 ng/ml) was added to the culture. 24h post-stimulation supernatant was collected and interleukin (IL)-8 was measured by ELISA (n = 4). Data are presented as means ± SEM and were analysed by Kruskall- Wallis analysis followed by Mann-Whitney- U tests. *P< 0.05 compared to control.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Marieke ten Brink and Joost Daalhuisen for expert technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TAFW JP LK WJW. Performed the experiments: TAFW JP TWV S. Ngugi S. Nepogodiev RF. Analyzed the data: TAFW JP TWV S. Ngugi S. Nepogodiev RF LK AV CV WJW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JP S. Ngugi S. Nepogodiev RF. Wrote the paper: TAFW JP TWV S. Ngugi S. Nepogodiev RF LK AV CV WJW.

Citation: Weehuizen TAF, Prior JL, van der Vaart TW, Ngugi SA, Nepogodiev SA, Field RA, et al. (2015) Differential Toll-Like Receptor-Signalling of Burkholderia pseudomallei Lipopolysaccharide in Murine and Human Models. PLoS ONE 10(12): e0145397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145397

References

1. Wiersinga WJ, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;367(11):1035–44. Epub 2012/09/14. pmid:22970946.

2. Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(2):383–416. Epub 2005/04/16. 18/2/383 [pii] pmid:15831829.

3. Rotz LD, Khan AS, Lillibridge SR, Ostroff SM, Hughes JM. Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents. Emerging infectious diseases. 2002;8(2):225–30. pmid:11897082; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2732458.

4. Charuchaimontri C, Suputtamongkol Y, Nilakul C, Chaowagul W, Chetchotisakd P, Lertpatanasuwun N, et al. Antilipopolysaccharide II: an antibody protective against fatal melioidosis. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1999;29(4):813–8. Epub 1999/12/10. pmid:10589895.

5. Ho M, Schollaardt T, Smith MD, Perry MB, Brett PJ, Chaowagul W, et al. Specificity and functional activity of anti-Burkholderia pseudomallei polysaccharide antibodies. Infection and immunity. 1997;65(9):3648–53. pmid:9284132; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC175519.

6. Matsuura M, Kawahara K, Ezaki T, Nakano M. Biological activities of lipopolysaccharide of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) pseudomallei. FEMS microbiology letters. 1996;137(1):79–83. pmid:8935661.

7. Caroff M, Karibian D, Cavaillon JM, Haeffner-Cavaillon N. Structural and functional analyses of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Microbes and infection / Institut Pasteur. 2002;4(9):915–26. Epub 2002/07/11. pmid:12106784.

8. Munford RS. Sensing gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharides: a human disease determinant? Infection and immunity. 2008;76(2):454–65. pmid:18086818; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2223455.

9. DeShazer D, Brett PJ, Woods DE. The type II O-antigenic polysaccharide moiety of Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide is required for serum resistance and virulence. Molecular microbiology. 1998;30(5):1081–100. Epub 1999/02/13. pmid:9988483.

10. Mulye M, Bechill MP, Grose W, Ferreira VP, Lafontaine ER, Wooten RM. Delineating the importance of serum opsonins and the bacterial capsule in affecting the uptake and killing of Burkholderia pseudomallei by murine neutrophils and macrophages. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2014;8(8):e2988. pmid:25144195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4140662.

11. Arjcharoen S, Wikraiphat C, Pudla M, Limposuwan K, Woods DE, Sirisinha S, et al. Fate of a Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide mutant in the mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7: possible role for the O-antigenic polysaccharide moiety of lipopolysaccharide in internalization and intracellular survival. Infection and immunity. 2007;75(9):4298–304. Epub 2007/06/20. pmid:17576760; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1951188.

12. Woodman ME, Worth RG, Wooten RM. Capsule influences the deposition of critical complement C3 levels required for the killing of Burkholderia pseudomallei via NADPH-oxidase induction by human neutrophils. PloS one. 2012;7(12):e52276. pmid:23251706; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3522640.

13. Reckseidler SL, DeShazer D, Sokol PA, Woods DE. Detection of bacterial virulence genes by subtractive hybridization: identification of capsular polysaccharide of Burkholderia pseudomallei as a major virulence determinant. Infection and immunity. 2001;69(1):34–44. pmid:11119486; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC97852.

14. Nelson M, Prior JL, Lever MS, Jones HE, Atkins TP, Titball RW. Evaluation of lipopolysaccharide and capsular polysaccharide as subunit vaccines against experimental melioidosis. Journal of medical microbiology. 2004;53(Pt 12):1177–82. pmid:15585494.

15. Simpson AJ, Opal SM, Angus BJ, Prins JM, Palardy JE, Parejo NA, et al. Differential antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in severe melioidosis. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2000;181(3):1014–9. pmid:10720525.

16. Novem V, Shui G, Wang D, Bendt AK, Sim SH, Liu Y, et al. Structural and biological diversity of lipopolysaccharides from Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia thailandensis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16(10):1420–8. pmid:19692625.

17. Darveau RP. Lipid A diversity and the innate host response to bacterial infection. Current opinion in microbiology. 1998;1(1):36–42. pmid:10066466.

18. Darveau RP, Pham TT, Lemley K, Reife RA, Bainbridge BW, Coats SR, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide contains multiple lipid A species that functionally interact with both toll-like receptors 2 and 4. Infection and immunity. 2004;72(9):5041–51. pmid:15321997.

19. Werts C, Tapping RI, Mathison JC, Chuang TH, Kravchenko V, Saint Girons I, et al. Leptospiral lipopolysaccharide activates cells through a TLR2-dependent mechanism. Nature immunology. 2001;2(4):346–52. pmid:11276206.

20. Brett PJ, Burtnick MN, Snyder DS, Shannon JG, Azadi P, Gherardini FC. Burkholderia mallei expresses a unique lipopolysaccharide mixture that is a potent activator of human Toll-like receptor 4 complexes. Molecular microbiology. 2007;63(2):379–90. pmid:17163980; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1974782.

21. Wiersinga WJ, Wieland CW, Dessing MC, Chantratita N, Cheng AC, Limmathurotsakul D, et al. Toll-like receptor 2 impairs host defense in gram-negative sepsis caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei (Melioidosis). PLoS medicine. 2007;4(7):e248. pmid:17676990; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1950213.

22. West TE, Ernst RK, Jansson-Hutson MJ, Skerrett SJ. Activation of Toll-like receptors by Burkholderia pseudomallei. BMC immunology. 2008;9:46. pmid:18691413.

23. Weshphal O. JK. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides, extraction with phenol–water and further applications of the procedure. Methods in carbohydrate chemistry. 1974;5:83–91.

24. Johnson K.G. PMB. Improved techniques for the preparation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Can J Microbiol. 1975;22:29–34.

25. Warren HS, Kania SA, Siber GR. Binding and neutralization of bacterial lipopolysaccharide by colistin nonapeptide. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1985;28(1):107–12. pmid:2412488.

26. Pristovsek P, Kidric J. Solution structure of polymyxins B and E and effect of binding to lipopolysaccharide: an NMR and molecular modeling study. Journal of medicinal chemistry. 1999;42(22):4604–13. pmid:10579822.

27. DeShazer D. Genomic diversity of Burkholderia pseudomallei clinical isolates: subtractive hybridization reveals a Burkholderia mallei-specific prophage in B. pseudomallei 1026b. Journal of bacteriology. 2004;186(12):3938–50. pmid:15175308; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC419931.

28. Lindner B. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry of lipopolysaccharides. Methods in molecular biology. 2000;145:311–25. pmid:10820729.

29. Goris MG, Wagenaar JF, Hartskeerl RA, van Gorp EC, Schuller S, Monahan AM, et al. Potent innate immune response to pathogenic leptospira in human whole blood. PloS one. 2012;6(3):e18279. pmid:21483834.

30. van 't Veer C, van den Pangaart PS, Kruijswijk D, Florquin S, de Vos AF, van der Poll T. Delineation of the role of Toll-like receptor signaling during peritonitis by a gradually growing pathogenic Escherichia coli. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2011;286(42):36603–18. pmid:21690093.

31. Anas AA, Hovius JW, van 't Veer C, van der Poll T, de Vos AF. Role of CD14 in a mouse model of acute lung inflammation induced by different lipopolysaccharide chemotypes. PloS one. 2010;5(4):e10183. pmid:20419140.

32. Tuanyok A, Stone JK, Mayo M, Kaestli M, Gruendike J, Georgia S, et al. The genetic and molecular basis of O-antigenic diversity in Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(1):e1453. pmid:22235357.

33. Tsai CM, Frasch CE. A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels. Analytical biochemistry. 1982;119(1):115–9. pmid:6176137.

34. Burtnick MN, Woods DE. Isolation of polymyxin B-susceptible mutants of Burkholderia pseudomallei and molecular characterization of genetic loci involved in polymyxin B resistance. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 1999;43(11):2648–56. pmid:10543742.

35. Park BS, Song DH, Kim HM, Choi BS, Lee H, Lee JO. The structural basis of lipopolysaccharide recognition by the TLR4-MD-2 complex. Nature. 2009;458(7242):1191–5. pmid:19252480.

36. Wiersinga WJ, Veer C, Wieland CW, Gibot S, Hooibrink B, Day NP, et al. Expression profile and function of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 during melioidosis. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2007;196(11):1707–16. pmid:18008257.

37. Medzhitov R. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nature reviews Immunology. 2001;1(2):135–45. pmid:11905821.

38. Chantratita N, Tandhavanant S, Myers ND, Seal S, Arayawichanont A, Kliangsa-Ad A, et al. Survey of innate immune responses to Burkholderia pseudomallei in human blood identifies a central role for lipopolysaccharide. PloS one. 2013;8(11):e81617. pmid:24303060; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3841221.

39. Seok J, Warren HS, Cuenca AG, Mindrinos MN, Baker HV, Xu W, et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(9):3507–12. pmid:23401516; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3587220.

40. Wiersinga WJ, Wieland CW, Roelofs JJ, van der Poll T. MyD88 dependent signaling contributes to protective host defense against Burkholderia pseudomallei. PloS one. 2008;3(10):e3494. pmid:18946505; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2566818.

41. Poltorak A, He X, Smirnova I, Liu MY, Van Huffel C, Du X, et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science (New York, NY. 1998;282(5396):2085–8. pmid:9851930.

42. Wiersinga WJ, de Vos AF, Wieland CW, Leendertse M, Roelofs JJ, van der Poll T. CD14 impairs host defense against gram-negative sepsis caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei in mice. The Journal of infectious diseases. 2008;198(9):1388–97. pmid:18855560.

43. Jiang Z, Georgel P, Du X, Shamel L, Sovath S, Mudd S, et al. CD14 is required for MyD88-independent LPS signaling. Nature immunology. 2005;6(6):565–70. pmid:15895089.

44. Anuntagool N, Aramsri P, Panichakul T, Wuthiekanun VR, Kinoshita R, White NJ, et al. Antigenic heterogeneity of lipopolysaccharide among Burkholderia pseudomallei clinical isolates. The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health. 2000;31 Suppl 1:146–52. pmid:11414445.

45. Anuntagool N, Wuthiekanun V, White NJ, Currie BJ, Sermswan RW, Wongratanacheewin S, et al. Lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity among Burkholderia pseudomallei from different geographic and clinical origins. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2006;74(3):348–52. pmid:16525090.

46. Netea MG, van Deuren M, Kullberg BJ, Cavaillon JM, Van der Meer JW. Does the shape of lipid A determine the interaction of LPS with Toll-like receptors? Trends in immunology. 2002;23(3):135–9. pmid:11864841.

47. Seydel U, Schromm AB, Blunck R, Brandenburg K. Chemical structure, molecular conformation, and bioactivity of endotoxins. Chemical immunology. 2000;74:5–24. pmid:10608079.

48. Nahori MA, Fournie-Amazouz E, Que-Gewirth NS, Balloy V, Chignard M, Raetz CR, et al. Differential TLR recognition of leptospiral lipid A and lipopolysaccharide in murine and human cells. J Immunol. 2005;175(9):6022–31. pmid:16237097.

49. Rehli M. Of mice and men: species variations of Toll-like receptor expression. Trends in immunology. 2002;23(8):375–8. pmid:12133792.

50. Hajjar AM, Ernst RK, Tsai JH, Wilson CB, Miller SI. Human Toll-like receptor 4 recognizes host-specific LPS modifications. Nature immunology. 2002;3(4):354–9. pmid:11912497.

51. West TE, Chierakul W, Chantratita N, Limmathurotsakul D, Wuthiekanun V, Emond MJ, et al. Toll-like receptor 4 region genetic variants are associated with susceptibility to melioidosis. Genes and immunity. 2012;13(1):38–46. pmid:21776015.

52. Chan JK, Roth J, Oppenheim JJ, Tracey KJ, Vogl T, Feldmann M, et al. Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2012;122(8):2711–9. pmid:22850880.

53. Meumann EM, Cheng AC, Ward L, Currie BJ. Clinical features and epidemiology of melioidosis pneumonia: results from a 21-year study and review of the literature. Clinical infectious diseases: an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2012;54(3):362–9. Epub 2011/11/08. cir808 [pii]. pmid:22057702.

54. Lee HK, Lee J, Tobias PS. Two lipoproteins extracted from Escherichia coli K-12 LCD25 lipopolysaccharide are the major components responsible for Toll-like receptor 2-mediated signaling. J Immunol. 2002;168(8):4012–7. pmid:11937558.

55. Yu M, Wang H, Ding A, Golenbock DT, Latz E, Czura CJ, et al. HMGB1 signals through toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 and TLR2. Shock (Augusta, Ga. 2006;26(2):174–9. pmid:16878026.

56. Centers for Disease C, Prevention DoH, Human S. Possession, use, and transfer of select agents and toxins; biennial review. Final rule. Federal register. 2012;77(194):61083–115. pmid:23038847.